SSL 2+ vs Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen): Detailed Audio Interface Comparison

SSL 2+ vs Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen): Detailed Audio Interface Comparison

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Solid State Logic SSL 2+ USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface are both highly regarded in the audio production community, each bringing a unique set of features tailored to different user needs.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen) is celebrated for its user-friendly interface and high-quality preamps, making it a popular choice for home recording enthusiasts and small studios. This latest generation boasts an improved dynamic range and ultra-low latency, enhancing the overall recording experience. It features two combo inputs (XLR/TRS) with Focusrite’s renowned preamps, which now include an "Air" mode to emulate the sound of their classic ISA preamps. The 2i2 also offers 24-bit/192kHz conversion, ensuring pristine audio quality. The USB-C connectivity ensures fast data transfer and broad compatibility with modern devices. Additionally, the Scarlett 2i2 comes with a robust software bundle, including Ableton Live Lite and Pro Tools First, which provides users with all the tools needed for music production right out of the box.
On the other hand, the Solid State Logic SSL 2+ is designed to bring the legendary SSL sound to desktop recording. Known for their high-end studio consoles, SSL has integrated their expertise into this compact interface. The SSL 2+ features two SSL-designed analog microphone preamps with a 4K Legacy mode, which adds subtle harmonic distortion and high-frequency boost inspired by the SSL 4000 series consoles. It also offers 24-bit/192kHz conversion, ensuring high-fidelity recordings. Beyond the two combo inputs, the SSL 2+ includes additional outputs, MIDI I/O, and an extra headphone output, making it more versatile for various studio setups. The interface comes with a comprehensive software bundle, including SSL Native plug-ins, Avid Pro Tools First, and Ableton Live Lite, providing a strong foundation for recording, mixing, and mastering.
Both interfaces are housed in sturdy, portable enclosures, making them ideal for mobile recording scenarios. While the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 emphasizes simplicity and ease of use, the SSL 2+ offers more extensive connectivity and the distinctive SSL sound. Your choice between the two would depend on whether you prioritize the straightforward, high-quality performance of the Scarlett or the additional features and classic sound character of the SSL 2+.

In-Depth Review and Comparison of SSL 2+ and Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen)

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
  • Purchase Value

    85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the balance between affordability and functionality, making it an excellent choice for both beginners and professionals. Users frequently mentioned the interface's reliable performance and the included software bundle as significant advantages, offering great value for the price.

    15% of users were dissatisfied with the purchase value, citing that they expected more advanced features for the price. Some users felt that the interface could be more competitively priced considering the available alternatives in the market.

    85%
  • Quality of Materials

    90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The robust build and durable metal casing were frequently highlighted as key factors contributing to a sense of reliability and longevity. Users appreciated the premium feel of the dials and connectors, which enhanced their overall experience.

    10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of materials, noting that some components felt slightly less durable over time. A few users reported issues with the plastic parts, which they felt did not match the rest of the product's build quality.

    90%
  • Ease of Use

    88% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface easy to use. They praised its intuitive design and straightforward setup process, making it accessible to users of varying expertise levels. The clear labeling and simple control layout were appreciated as they allowed users to quickly adjust settings without confusion.

    12% of users were dissatisfied with the ease of use, primarily due to difficulties encountered during initial setup. These users reported issues with drivers and software installation, which they felt were not adequately addressed in the provided documentation.

    88%
  • Sound Quality

    92% of users were impressed with the sound quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, noting its clear and crisp audio output as a standout feature. Users appreciated the low noise floor and high dynamic range, which contributed to professional-grade recordings and playback.

    8% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, mentioning occasional latency issues and minor distortion at high volumes. Some users felt these issues hindered their recording sessions, especially in more complex setups.

    92%
  • Compatibility

    87% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing its seamless integration with various DAWs and operating systems as a major advantage. Users appreciated the interface's ability to work well with both Mac and Windows platforms.

    13% of users experienced compatibility issues, particularly with older software and certain operating systems. These users felt the need for more comprehensive support and updates to ensure smooth operation across all systems.

    87%
  • Portability

    85% of users praised the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, highlighting its compact size and lightweight design. This made it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions or gigs, which was a significant plus for users frequently on the move.

    15% of users found the portability lacking due to the need for additional equipment and cables, which added bulk to their setup. Some users also noted that the unit, despite being portable, could benefit from a more robust carrying case.

    85%
  • Durability

    88% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often commenting on its sturdy construction. Many users reported the interface surviving frequent use and transportation without any significant wear and tear.

    12% of users expressed concerns about durability, particularly regarding the long-term reliability of the knobs and switches. Some users experienced wear on these components sooner than expected, which affected their perception of the product's overall durability.

    88%
  • Aesthetics

    90% of users were pleased with the aesthetics of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often mentioning its sleek and modern design. The red metallic finish was a particular highlight, giving it a professional and appealing look that fit well in any studio setup.

    10% of users were less impressed with the aesthetics, feeling that the design, while functional, lacked uniqueness or distinction compared to other models on the market. Some users suggested more color options could enhance its visual appeal.

    90%
  • Customer Support

    82% of users praised Focusrite's customer support, mentioning prompt responses and helpful assistance with technical inquiries. Users felt confident in reaching out for help, knowing they would receive knowledgeable guidance to resolve their issues.

    18% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses and unhelpful troubleshooting advice. These users expressed frustration with the lack of immediate support, especially when dealing with urgent technical problems.

    82%
  • Latency

    89% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found it capable of handling real-time monitoring and recording without noticeable delays, which was crucial for professional audio work.

    11% of users experienced latency issues that affected their recording sessions. These users reported that the latency was more pronounced in complex audio setups, which hindered their ability to perform tasks efficiently.

    89%
  • Driver Stability

    83% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The majority of users reported consistent performance with minimal crashes or connectivity issues, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions.

    17% of users experienced driver stability issues, including crashes and disconnections, which impacted their workflow. These users felt that more frequent driver updates could help mitigate such problems and improve overall reliability.

    83%
  • Preamp Quality

    91% of users were highly satisfied with the preamp quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted the clean and transparent sound the preamps provided, which allowed for accurate capture of vocals and instruments without coloration.

    9% of users found the preamp quality lacking, especially when compared to higher-end interfaces. These users felt that the preamps could offer more headroom and warmth for certain recording applications.

    91%
  • Software Bundle

    86% of users appreciated the software bundle included with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the DAW and plugin offerings to be a valuable addition that enhanced their recording and production capabilities right out of the box.

    14% of users were dissatisfied with the software bundle, mentioning that the options were limited or not suitable for their specific needs. Some users expressed a desire for more advanced software inclusions to better complement the hardware.

    86%
  • Input/Output Options

    84% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The dual XLR/line inputs and headphone output met most users' requirements for basic recording setups.

    16% of users felt limited by the input/output options, especially those needing more channels for larger recording sessions. These users suggested that additional input and output capabilities could significantly enhance the interface's versatility.

    84%
  • Phantom Power

    87% of users appreciated the inclusion of phantom power on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, enabling them to use condenser microphones effectively. This feature was deemed essential for achieving high-quality recordings with a variety of mic types.

    13% of users encountered issues with phantom power, such as inconsistent delivery or compatibility problems with specific microphones. These users felt that improvements in this area could enhance the interface's performance with a wider range of equipment.

    87%
  • USB-C Connectivity

    89% of users were pleased with the USB-C connectivity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Audio Interface, noting the faster data transfer and improved power efficiency. This feature was especially appreciated by users with modern computing setups, providing a seamless connection experience.

    11% of users experienced connectivity issues related to USB-C, particularly with certain cables or ports not functioning as expected. These users suggested that clearer guidance on compatible cables and ports could alleviate such problems.

    89%
  • Overall Satisfaction

    88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing it as a reliable and high-performance tool for their audio needs. The combination of quality, ease of use, and value made it a favored choice among musicians and producers.

    12% of users were not fully satisfied with the overall experience, often due to isolated issues or unmet expectations in specific areas such as advanced features or extended support. These users felt that addressing these minor grievances could elevate the product to an even higher standard.

    88%
  • Recording Quality

    91% of users were highly satisfied with the recording quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted its ability to capture detailed and accurate audio, making it suitable for various applications from podcasts to music production.

    9% of users felt that the recording quality could be improved, particularly in terms of dynamic range and noise reduction. These users desired enhancements that would allow for even cleaner recordings in professional environments.

    91%
  • Monitor Control

    86% of users appreciated the monitor control features of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, particularly the direct monitor switch and volume control. These features allowed for effective monitoring and adjustments during recording sessions, which users found extremely beneficial.

    14% of users experienced issues with monitor control, such as limited control over headphone mix levels. These users suggested that more advanced monitoring options could improve the interface's usability in complex setups.

    86%
  • Updates and Support

    80% of users were satisfied with the updates and support provided for the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the ongoing driver updates and support resources available, which helped maintain the interface's performance over time.

    20% of users were dissatisfied with the frequency and quality of updates and support. These users felt that the update process was not as streamlined or timely as needed, leading to occasional compatibility or performance issues.

    80%
  • Product Longevity

    87% of users were satisfied with the product longevity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, reporting that it remained functional and reliable over extended periods of use. This aspect contributed to users' confidence in their investment.

    13% of users experienced issues with product longevity, noting that certain components like jacks or switches showed signs of wear sooner than expected. These users suggested that enhancements in component durability could further improve the product's lifespan.

    87%
  • Purchase Value

    88% of users felt that the Solid State Logic SSL 2+ USB-C Audio Interface offered excellent purchase value. They appreciated the high-quality preamps and the overall sound clarity, which they felt were comparable to more expensive models. The build quality and additional features such as the legacy 4K mode added to the perceived value, making it a worthwhile investment for both beginners and professionals.

    12% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to the higher price point compared to other entry-level interfaces. They felt that while the quality was high, similar features could be found in less expensive alternatives, making it less accessible for budget-conscious users.

    88%
  • Sound Quality

    92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality of the SSL 2+ interface. They highlighted the clarity and depth of the preamps, which provided a professional-grade audio experience. Users praised the interface for its ability to capture nuanced sound details, making it ideal for recording musicians and podcasters alike.

    8% of users were not fully satisfied with the sound quality, mainly due to some minor issues with noise levels at higher gain settings. These users felt that while the general sound quality was excellent, these occasional issues detracted from their overall experience.

    92%
  • Build Quality

    90% of users praised the build quality of the SSL 2+, noting its robust and durable construction. The interface's solid metal chassis and high-quality components were frequently mentioned as indicators of its long-term reliability, providing users with confidence in their purchase.

    10% of users felt that the build quality could be improved. Some users reported issues with the durability of the knobs and buttons, which they felt were not as sturdy as the rest of the unit, leading to concerns about their longevity.

    90%
  • Ease of Use

    85% of users found the SSL 2+ interface easy to use, especially appreciating its straightforward layout and intuitive controls. The setup process was often described as quick and user-friendly, making it accessible for both beginners and experienced users.

    15% of users experienced difficulties with the ease of use, citing issues with driver installation and software compatibility. These users found the initial setup process cumbersome and felt that more comprehensive instructions or support would have been beneficial.

    85%
  • Portability

    82% of users were satisfied with the portability of the SSL 2+. They appreciated the compact design, which made it easy to transport and use in various recording environments, whether at home or on the go.

    18% of users were less satisfied with the portability, stating that the interface was slightly heavier than expected, which made it less convenient for travel compared to more lightweight models. Additionally, some users desired a more protective carrying case for transport.

    82%
  • Connectivity Options

    89% of users were pleased with the connectivity options provided by the SSL 2+. The dual headphone outputs, MIDI I/O, and USB-C connectivity were particularly appreciated, offering flexibility for various recording setups.

    11% of users were dissatisfied with the connectivity options, mainly due to the lack of additional line inputs or outputs. These users felt limited by the available ports for more complex recording configurations.

    89%
  • Driver Stability

    84% of users reported stable and reliable driver performance with the SSL 2+, noting consistent connectivity and minimal latency issues. The drivers were often highlighted for their compatibility with a wide range of DAWs.

    16% of users faced challenges with driver stability, experiencing occasional dropouts or compatibility issues with certain operating systems. These users expressed the need for more frequent driver updates to address these concerns.

    84%
  • Software Bundle

    87% of users were satisfied with the software bundle that comes with the SSL 2+. The inclusion of SSL Native plugins and other DAW software was seen as a valuable addition, enhancing the overall user experience.

    13% of users were not fully satisfied with the software bundle, primarily due to compatibility issues or limited use of the included software. Some users also felt that the software could be more intuitive or better integrated with the hardware.

    87%
  • Aesthetic Design

    91% of users appreciated the aesthetic design of the SSL 2+. The sleek and professional appearance, combined with intuitive labeling and layout, contributed to a positive user experience and was often cited as a reason for choosing this interface over others.

    9% of users were less impressed by the aesthetic design, finding it too minimalistic or plain compared to other interfaces. Some users desired more visual appeal or customization options to better match their personal setup.

    91%
  • Customer Support

    80% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Solid State Logic. They noted the prompt and helpful responses from support staff, which contributed to resolving any issues they encountered quickly and efficiently.

    20% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, mentioning delays in response times or lack of thorough solutions to their problems. These users felt that the support team could be more proactive in assisting with technical issues.

    80%
  • Durability

    86% of users were satisfied with the durability of the SSL 2+, noting its solid build and reliable performance over time. Many users felt confident in the interface's ability to withstand regular use without degradation in quality.

    14% of users expressed concerns about the durability, particularly regarding minor wear and tear on the interface's exterior or concerns about the longevity of specific components like knobs and buttons under heavy use.

    86%
  • Latency Performance

    89% of users were satisfied with the latency performance of the SSL 2+. They reported minimal latency during recording and playback, which was crucial for seamless audio production and monitoring.

    11% of users encountered issues with latency performance, especially under heavy load or complex project settings. These users felt that the interface could benefit from further optimization to handle demanding audio tasks more effectively.

    89%
  • Versatility

    88% of users found the SSL 2+ to be a versatile audio interface, suitable for various recording applications from music production to podcasting. The feature set and connectivity options allowed users to adapt the interface to their specific needs.

    12% of users were less satisfied with the versatility, particularly those who required more specialized inputs or outputs for niche applications. They felt that while the interface was solid for general use, it lacked certain features for more specialized recording scenarios.

    88%
  • Clarity of Instructions

    83% of users were satisfied with the clarity of the instructions provided with the SSL 2+. They found the user manual and setup guides to be straightforward and helpful in navigating the interface's features.

    17% of users found the instructions lacking in clarity or detail, especially for troubleshooting more complex issues. These users suggested that more comprehensive guides or tutorials would enhance the overall user experience.

    83%
  • Compatibility with DAWs

    86% of users were satisfied with the interface's compatibility with various DAWs. They found it easy to integrate the SSL 2+ with popular digital audio workstations, which facilitated a smooth workflow.

    14% of users experienced compatibility issues with certain DAWs or operating systems, which occasionally led to frustration or the need for additional configuration. These users felt that better documentation or support for specific DAW setups would be beneficial.

    86%
  • Noise Floor

    88% of users praised the low noise floor of the SSL 2+, noting that it allowed for clean recordings with minimal background noise. This aspect was particularly appreciated by users working in home studio environments.

    12% of users reported issues with the noise floor, particularly at higher gain levels. These users felt that while the noise floor was generally low, there were occasional instances of unwanted noise that could interfere with recordings.

    88%
  • LED Metering

    85% of users were satisfied with the LED metering on the SSL 2+. They found the visual feedback helpful for monitoring input levels and avoiding clipping, which was crucial for maintaining recording quality.

    15% of users were not satisfied with the LED metering, suggesting that more detailed or customizable metering options would enhance usability. Some users felt that the current metering was too basic for more advanced monitoring needs.

    85%
  • Preamps

    91% of users were highly satisfied with the quality of the preamps in the SSL 2+. They frequently noted the clean and transparent sound, which was ideal for capturing vocals and instruments with precision and clarity.

    9% of users felt that while the preamps were generally of high quality, they lacked the warmth or character found in some other interfaces. These users desired more tonal variety or options for coloration.

    91%
  • Legacy 4K Mode

    87% of users appreciated the legacy 4K mode feature, noting that it added a desirable analog warmth to their recordings. This feature was praised for enhancing the overall sound quality and providing a unique tonal option.

    13% of users were less impressed with the legacy 4K mode, finding that it did not significantly alter the sound to their liking or match their expectations for analog emulation. These users felt that the effect was too subtle or not as impactful as advertised.

    87%
  • Power Supply

    84% of users were satisfied with the power supply options of the SSL 2+, including the convenience of USB bus power. This feature made it easy to use the interface with various setups without needing an external power source.

    16% of users encountered issues with the power supply, particularly in setups where USB power was insufficient, leading to operational instability. These users suggested that an optional external power adapter would be a useful addition.

    84%
Show More
Pros:
  • High-quality preamps for clear audio capture.
  • USB-C connectivity for faster data transfer and compatibility.
  • Compact and portable design.
  • Low latency monitoring.
  • Easy setup and user-friendly interface.
  • High-quality SSL preamps for professional-grade audio recording
  • USB-C connectivity for fast and reliable data transfer
  • Comprehensive software bundle included
  • Rugged and compact design for portability
  • Low-latency monitoring with direct monitoring feature
Cons:
  • Limited to two inputs, which may not be enough for some users.
  • No MIDI input/output.
  • Higher price point compared to some competitors.
  • Requires external power when used with some devices.
  • Limited to two input channels, which may not suffice for larger setups
  • Higher price point compared to other entry-level interfaces
  • No dedicated MIDI output
  • Lacks onboard DSP for effects processing
  • Requires external power supply for optimal performance
Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog:
2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Analog:
2 Inputs / 4 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit 192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 2 Preamps
Analog Audio I/O
2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel)
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output
1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output
4x RCA TS Unbalanced Line Output
2x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output
Host Connection
1x USB-C 1x USB-C
OS Compatibility
macOS
Windows
macOS 10.11
macOS 10.12
macOS 10.13
macOS 10.14
macOS 10.15
Windows 8.1
Windows 10
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included) USB Bus Power
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Solid State Logic SSL 2+ USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface both present robust solutions for audio recording, yet they differ in several key features.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers 2 channels of I/O, with a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit resolution. It includes 2 microphone inputs, and its analog audio I/O consists of 2 XLR 3-pin balanced mic inputs, 2 1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced line/Hi-Z inputs on the front panel, and 2 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs. Additionally, it has a 1/4" TRS headphone output on the front panel. The Scarlett 2i2 does not include digital audio I/O. It connects to the host via a single USB-C connection and is compatible with both macOS and Windows operating systems. Power is supplied through USB bus power, with an option for a USB power adapter which is not included.
Conversely, the Solid State Logic SSL 2+ provides 2 analog input channels and 4 output channels at the same maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit resolution. It also features 2 microphone preamps. The analog audio I/O includes 2 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced mic/line/Hi-Z inputs, 2 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs, 4 RCA TS unbalanced line outputs, and 2 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone outputs. The SSL 2+ connects to the host via a single USB-C connection and supports macOS versions from 10.11 to 10.15 and Windows 8.1 and 10. It is powered solely through USB bus power.
In summary, while both interfaces offer high-quality audio recording with similar sampling rates and bit depths, the SSL 2+ provides additional output channels and more versatile connectivity options with its combo inputs and extra RCA outputs. The Scarlett 2i2, on the other hand, focuses on a streamlined set of inputs and outputs, which may be sufficient for users with simpler recording setups. Both interfaces are USB-C powered and compatible with major operating systems, ensuring wide usability.
General
Channels of I/O
Analog:
2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Analog:
2 Inputs / 4 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit 192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 2 Preamps
Input Level Adjustment
2x Knob 2x Knob
Expansion Slots
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Solid State Logic SSL 2+ USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface are both high-quality audio interfaces designed to meet the needs of producers, musicians, and audio engineers. However, they differ in certain features that might make one more suitable than the other depending on the user's requirements.
In terms of channels of input and output, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers 2 analog inputs and 2 analog outputs at a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz. The Solid State Logic SSL 2+, on the other hand, provides 2 analog inputs and 4 analog outputs at the same maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz. This makes the SSL 2+ more versatile for users who need additional output channels for their audio projects.
Both interfaces support a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit, ensuring high-quality audio recording and playback. They also feature 2 microphone inputs each, with the Scarlett 2i2 including 2 microphone inputs and the SSL 2+ specifying 2 preamps for its microphone inputs, which are known for their professional-grade quality.
When it comes to input level adjustment, both interfaces are equipped with 2 knobs, allowing users to easily control the input levels for their recordings. Neither interface includes built-in DSP or expansion slots, which keeps their designs straightforward and focused on core audio interface functionality.
Overall, while both the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 and the Solid State Logic SSL 2+ offer high-resolution audio and similar basic features, the SSL 2+ distinguishes itself with additional output channels, which could be a deciding factor for users needing more comprehensive output routing options.
Signal Processing
Gain/Trim Range
Mic/Line Inputs:
Up to +69 dB
Hi-Z Inputs:
62 dB
Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs:
Up to 62 dB
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Solid State Logic SSL 2+ USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface both offer compelling features for audio recording and production, but they differ in some key areas.
In terms of gain/trim range, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 provides a more extensive range. The Mic/Line inputs can reach up to +69 dB, while the Hi-Z inputs offer up to 62 dB. This makes the Scarlett 2i2 particularly versatile for handling a variety of microphone sensitivities and instrument outputs, allowing for greater flexibility in recording different sound sources.
On the other hand, the Solid State Logic SSL 2+ offers a maximum gain/trim range of up to 62 dB across its Mic/Line/Hi-Z inputs. While slightly less than the Scarlett 2i2 in terms of maximum gain, this range is still quite robust and should be sufficient for most recording needs.
Notably, the SSL 2+ lacks a pad feature, which is sometimes used to prevent signal overload by reducing the input level. The absence of this feature might be a consideration for those who frequently record very loud sources. Additionally, the SSL 2+ does not include a high-pass filter, which can be useful for eliminating low-frequency noise or rumble from recordings. The absence of solo/mute functionality might also be a limitation for users who need these controls for precise monitoring and mixing.
Overall, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) offers a higher gain range and potentially greater flexibility for various recording scenarios, while the SSL 2+ provides solid performance but lacks some additional features like a pad, high-pass filter, and solo/mute functions. Depending on specific recording needs and preferences, either interface could be a suitable choice.
Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel)
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output
1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output
4x RCA TS Unbalanced Line Output
2x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output
Phantom Power
48 V, Selectable On/Off 48 V, Selectable On/Off (Selectable on Individual Inputs)
Digital Audio I/O
Host Connection
1x USB-C 1x USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0 USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)
1x USB-C (Power Input)
Sync I/O
Network I/O
MIDI I/O
1x DIN 5-Pin Input
1x DIN 5-Pin Output
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Solid State Logic SSL 2+ USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface both offer high-quality features for audio recording and production, but they differ in several key areas.
In terms of Analog Audio I/O, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 provides 2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Inputs and 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Inputs on the front panel, along with 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Outputs and a single 1/4" TRS Headphone Output on the front panel. On the other hand, the SSL 2+ features 2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs, 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Outputs, 4x RCA TS Unbalanced Line Outputs, and 2x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Outputs. The SSL 2+ provides more output options, including RCA outputs, which can be advantageous for connecting to different types of equipment.
Both interfaces offer 48V phantom power for their mic inputs, but the SSL 2+ allows for selectable phantom power on individual inputs, giving more flexibility in mixed microphone setups. The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 does not provide this per-channel control, offering a single switch to enable or disable phantom power for both mic inputs simultaneously.
Neither model includes Digital Audio I/O, Sync I/O, or Network I/O capabilities. However, the SSL 2+ has a significant advantage with its inclusion of MIDI I/O, featuring 1x DIN 5-Pin Input and 1x DIN 5-Pin Output, which allows for better integration with MIDI controllers and other MIDI-capable hardware. The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 lacks any MIDI I/O capability, which might be a dealbreaker for users needing this functionality.
For host connection, both interfaces utilize a single USB-C port with a USB 2.0 protocol, ensuring compatibility with modern computers. The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 also includes an additional USB-C port dedicated to power input, which can be useful in scenarios where additional power stability is required.
In summary, while both the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 and the SSL 2+ offer robust and high-quality audio interface solutions, the SSL 2+ stands out with its additional output options, individual phantom power control per input, and the inclusion of MIDI I/O. The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2, however, may appeal to those looking for a more straightforward setup without the need for MIDI capabilities or multiple output types.
Performance
Frequency Response
XLR Mic Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB
1/4" Line Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.05 dB
1/4" Hi-Z Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.15 dB
Line, Hi-Z Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.05 dB
Mic Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.1 dB
Line, Headphone, Monitor Outputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.05 dB
Maximum Input Level
XLR Mic:
16 dBu
1/4" Line:
22 dBu
1/4" Hi-Z:
12 dBu
Mic Inputs:
+5.5 dBu
Line Inputs:
+24 dBu
Hi-Z Inputs:
+15 dBu
Maximum Output Level
1/4" Line:
+16 dBu
1/4" Monitor Outputs:
+12.5 dBu
RCA Line Outputs:
+6.5 dBu
Headphone Outputs:
+10 dBu
Impedance
XLR Mic Inputs:
3 Kilohms
1/4" Line Inputs:
60 Kilohms
1/4" Hi-Z Inputs:
1 Megohms
1/4" Line Outputs:
100 Ohms
1/4" Headphone Outputs:
< 50 Ohm
Mic Inputs:
1.2 Kilohms
Line Inputs:
10 Kilohms
Hi-Z Inputs:
1 Megohm
Monitor Outputs:
1 Ohm
RCA Line Outputs:
< 1 Ohm
Headphone Outputs:
10 Ohms
Dynamic Range
XLR Mic Inputs:
116 dBA
1/4" Line Inputs:
115.2 dBA
1/4" Hi-Z Inputs:
113 dBA
1/4" Line Outputs:
120 dB
1/4" Headphone:
112 dB (at 33 Ohms)
115 dB (at 300 Ohms)
Digital A/D Converters:
120 dB
Digital D/A Converters:
130 dBA
Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs:
110.5 dB (A-Weighted)
Monitor Outputs:
112 dB (A-Weighted)
RCA Line Outputs:
110 dB
Headphone Outputs:
111 dB (A-Weighted)
THD+N
XLR Mic Inputs:
-100 dB (at 8 dB Gain)
1/4" Line Inputs:
-100 dB (at 8 dB Gain)
1/4" Hi-Z Inputs:
-80 dB (at Minimum Gain)
1/4" Line Outputs:
-109 dB
1/4" Headphone Outputs:
-99 dB (at 33 Ohms)
-108 dB (at 300 Ohms)
Digital A/D Converters:
-110 dB
Digital D/A Converters:
-115 dB
Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs:
< 0.005% (at -1 dBFS)
Monitor Outputs:
< 0.002% (at -1 dBFS)
RCA Line Outputs:
< 0.0025% (at -1 dBFS)
Headphone Outputs:
< 0.002% (at -1 dBFS)
EIN
XLR Mic Inputs:
-127 dBu A-Weighted
Mic Inputs:
-130.5 dBu A-Weighted (150-Ohm Source)
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Solid State Logic SSL 2+ USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface are both premium audio interfaces, but they differ significantly in their specifications.
Starting with the frequency response, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 provides a very flat response across all input types: XLR mic inputs offer a range of 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB, 1/4" line inputs at 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.05 dB, and 1/4" Hi-Z inputs at 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.15 dB. In comparison, the SSL 2+ offers a similar range but with slight variations: line and Hi-Z inputs at 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.05 dB, mic inputs at 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.1 dB, and line, headphone, and monitor outputs at 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.05 dB.
Regarding maximum input levels, the Scarlett 2i2 accommodates up to 16 dBu on XLR mic inputs, 22 dBu on 1/4" line inputs, and 12 dBu on 1/4" Hi-Z inputs. The SSL 2+ has higher capabilities with mic inputs supporting up to +5.5 dBu, line inputs at +24 dBu, and Hi-Z inputs at +15 dBu.
When it comes to maximum output levels, the Scarlett 2i2 provides up to +16 dBu on 1/4" line outputs and delivers 32 mW into 33 Ohms and 22 mW into 300 Ohms for headphone outputs. The SSL 2+ offers lower output levels with +12.5 dBu for monitor outputs, +6.5 dBu for RCA line outputs, and +10 dBu for headphone outputs.
The impedance specifications show that the Scarlett 2i2 has XLR mic inputs at 3 Kilohms, 1/4" line inputs at 60 Kilohms, 1/4" Hi-Z inputs at 1 Megohms, 1/4" line outputs at 100 Ohms, and 1/4" headphone outputs at less than 50 Ohms. The SSL 2+ features mic inputs at 1.2 Kilohms, line inputs at 10 Kilohms, Hi-Z inputs at 1 Megohm, monitor outputs at 1 Ohm, RCA line outputs at less than 1 Ohm, and headphone outputs at 10 Ohms.
In terms of dynamic range, the Scarlett 2i2 excels with XLR mic inputs at 116 dBA, 1/4" line inputs at 115.2 dBA, 1/4" Hi-Z inputs at 113 dBA, line outputs at 120 dB, and headphone outputs at 112 dB (33 Ohms) and 115 dB (300 Ohms). Its digital A/D and D/A converters offer 120 dB and 130 dBA, respectively. The SSL 2+ offers a slightly lower dynamic range: mic/line/Hi-Z inputs at 110.5 dB (A-Weighted), monitor outputs at 112 dB, RCA line outputs at 110 dB, and headphone outputs at 111 dB (A-Weighted).
For THD+N, the Scarlett 2i2 shows -100 dB for XLR mic and 1/4" line inputs, -80 dB for 1/4" Hi-Z inputs, -109 dB for 1/4" line outputs, and -99 dB (33 Ohms) and -108 dB (300 Ohms) for headphone outputs. Its digital converters have -110 dB for A/D and -115 dB for D/A. The SSL 2+ has lower THD+N values: less than 0.005% for mic/line/Hi-Z inputs, less than 0.002% for monitor outputs, less than 0.0025% for RCA line outputs, and less than 0.002% for headphone outputs.
Finally, the Equivalent Input Noise (EIN) for the Scarlett 2i2 is -127 dBu A-Weighted for XLR mic inputs, whereas the SSL 2+ offers a slightly better performance at -130.5 dBu A-Weighted for mic inputs with a 150-Ohm source.
Digital Audio
Sample Rates
44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 / 176.4 / 192 kHz Up to 192 kHz
Bit Depths
24-Bit Up to 24-Bit
Sync Sources
Internal Internal
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Solid State Logic SSL 2+ USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface both offer high-quality audio performance, yet they have some differences in their specifications.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) supports sample rates of 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, 176.4, and 192 kHz with a bit depth of 24-bit. It uses an internal sync source for its operations. This extensive range of sample rates provides flexibility for various recording and production needs, from basic recordings to high-resolution audio.
On the other hand, the Solid State Logic SSL 2+ supports sample rates up to 192 kHz and bit depths up to 24-bit, similar to the Scarlett 2i2. However, it does not feature sample rate conversion. The SSL 2+ boasts a latency of less than 1 ms at 48 kHz from input to output, which is particularly advantageous for real-time monitoring and recording. Like the Scarlett 2i2, the SSL 2+ also uses an internal sync source.
Both interfaces are designed to deliver professional-grade audio fidelity, but the SSL 2+ offers a noteworthy advantage in terms of low latency, which can be crucial for certain recording and production environments. The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2's wide range of sample rates might be more appealing for users who need versatility in their recording settings.
Audio Storage & Playback
Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS
Windows
macOS 10.11
macOS 10.12
macOS 10.13
macOS 10.14
macOS 10.15
Windows 8.1
Windows 10
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Solid State Logic SSL 2+ USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface have distinct features tailored to different user needs, particularly concerning OS compatibility and mobile app/device compatibility.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 is compatible with both macOS and Windows operating systems, making it versatile for users across different platforms. Additionally, it supports a mobile app compatible with iPadOS, which is a significant advantage for users who prefer or need to integrate their iPad into their audio production workflow.
On the other hand, the Solid State Logic SSL 2+ offers compatibility with a broader range of specific macOS versions (10.11 through 10.15) and Windows versions (8.1 and 10). However, it does not offer compatibility with mobile devices, which could be a limitation for users looking to incorporate tablets or smartphones into their setup.
The SSL 2+ also requires an available USB 2.0 port and includes a USB cable, ensuring that users have the necessary hardware to get started right away. Additionally, an internet connection is required for registration and software/driver download, which is an important consideration for users needing to set up the interface.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 provides broader operating system compatibility and the added benefit of mobile app compatibility with iPadOS, making it suitable for users looking for flexibility and integration with mobile devices. The SSL 2+, while offering more specific OS compatibility and necessary hardware inclusions, does not support mobile devices, which may limit its appeal to users seeking mobile integration.
Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included) USB Bus Power
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Solid State Logic SSL 2+ USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface both offer USB bus power capabilities, allowing them to be powered directly via a USB connection to a computer. This makes them convenient for mobile setups and reduces the need for additional power sources.
However, the Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen) also provides the option to use a USB power adapter, which is not included with the device. This flexibility can be beneficial in scenarios where a more stable power source is required, or when the USB bus power might not suffice due to other connected peripherals. The Scarlett 2i2 requires an AC/DC power adapter that supplies 5 VDC at 900 mA and has a power consumption of 4.5 watts.
In contrast, the SSL 2+ relies solely on USB bus power, streamlining its setup by eliminating the need for any additional power adapters. This can be an advantage for users who prioritize simplicity and minimal cable clutter. However, it also means that the SSL 2+'s performance is entirely dependent on the power it can draw from the USB connection, which could be a consideration in power-constrained environments.
In summary, while both interfaces support USB bus power, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen) offers an additional option for external power via a USB power adapter, which can enhance its versatility under varying power conditions. The SSL 2+, on the other hand, keeps things straightforward with exclusive USB bus power dependency, which may appeal to users seeking a more streamlined setup.
Physical
Dimensions
7.1 x 4.6 x 1.87" / 18 x 11.7 x 4.75 cm 9.2 x 6.2 x 2.7" / 23.4 x 15.7 x 6.9 cm
Weight
1.3 lb / 595.0 g 2.0 lb / 0.9 kg
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) measures 7.1 x 4.6 x 1.87 inches (18 x 11.7 x 4.75 cm) and weighs 1.3 pounds (595.0 g). On the other hand, the Solid State Logic SSL 2+ USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface has dimensions of 9.2 x 6.2 x 2.7 inches (23.4 x 15.7 x 6.9 cm) and a weight of 2.0 pounds (0.9 kg).
In terms of additional features, the Solid State Logic SSL 2+ includes a Kensington Security Slot for anti-theft protection. It also specifies an operating temperature range of 33 to 104°F (1 to 40°C) and a storage temperature range of -4 to 122°F (-20 to 50°C). The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 does not list similar anti-theft or temperature range features.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 is more compact and lighter compared to the Solid State Logic SSL 2+. However, the SSL 2+ offers additional security and environmental durability features, making it potentially more suitable for varied working conditions.
Packaging Info
Package Weight
1.9 lb 2.61 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
8.2 x 7 x 2.6" 10.9 x 7.9 x 4.1"
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) has a package weight of 1.9 lb and box dimensions of 8.2 x 7 x 2.6 inches. In contrast, the Solid State Logic SSL 2+ USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface is slightly heavier with a package weight of 2.61 lb and larger box dimensions of 10.9 x 7.9 x 4.1 inches.
Comparing the physical attributes, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 is more compact and lightweight, making it potentially more portable and easier to fit into smaller studio spaces. The SSL 2+, while heavier and larger, might offer more robust build quality or additional features that justify its larger size and weight.
Each interface's dimensions and weight can affect their portability and ease of use in different environments, so potential buyers should consider these factors based on their specific needs and preferences.
Customer Images
Videos