Focusrite Scarlett Solo vs Scarlett 2i2: Which 4th Gen Audio Interface is Right for You?

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) are both high-quality audio interfaces designed for musicians, producers, and content creators. However, they cater to slightly different needs.
The Scarlett 2i2 is a more versatile option, featuring two combo inputs that can accept both XLR and 1/4" (6.35 mm) connections. This allows you to simultaneously record two microphones, two instruments, or a combination of both. It also includes dedicated gain controls for each input, as well as 48V phantom power for condenser microphones. The 2i2 offers two balanced TRS outputs for connecting studio monitors, as well as a headphone output with its own level control. This model is ideal for users who need to record multiple sources at once, making it perfect for small bands, podcasters, or multi-instrumentalists.
On the other hand, the Scarlett Solo is designed for simplicity and ease of use, making it an excellent choice for solo artists and beginners. It features a single combo input for microphones or instruments and a dedicated instrument input, each with its own gain control and 48V phantom power for the microphone input. The Solo also includes a single headphone output and a pair of RCA outputs for connecting to speakers. While it lacks the dual input capability of the 2i2, its streamlined design makes it a straightforward choice for those who only need to record one source at a time.
Both interfaces share several key features, including high-quality preamps, low-latency performance, and USB-C connectivity for fast and reliable data transfer. They also come with a comprehensive software bundle that includes DAWs and various plug-ins to get you started on your recording journey.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) offers greater flexibility with its dual input capability and multiple output options, making it suitable for more complex recording setups. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation) provides a simpler, more focused solution for individual artists who require fewer inputs and outputs. Both models maintain Focusrite’s reputation for delivering excellent sound quality and user-friendly design.

Detailed Specifications and In-Depth Review: Focusrite Scarlett Solo vs Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation)

Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation)

Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation)

Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation)

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the balance between affordability and functionality, making it an excellent choice for both beginners and professionals. Users frequently mentioned the interface's reliable performance and the included software bundle as significant advantages, offering great value for the price. 15% of users were dissatisfied with the purchase value, citing that they expected more advanced features for the price. Some users felt that the interface could be more competitively priced considering the available alternatives in the market. 85% Quality of Materials 90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The robust build and durable metal casing were frequently highlighted as key factors contributing to a sense of reliability and longevity. Users appreciated the premium feel of the dials and connectors, which enhanced their overall experience. 10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of materials, noting that some components felt slightly less durable over time. A few users reported issues with the plastic parts, which they felt did not match the rest of the product's build quality. 90% Ease of Use 88% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface easy to use. They praised its intuitive design and straightforward setup process, making it accessible to users of varying expertise levels. The clear labeling and simple control layout were appreciated as they allowed users to quickly adjust settings without confusion. 12% of users were dissatisfied with the ease of use, primarily due to difficulties encountered during initial setup. These users reported issues with drivers and software installation, which they felt were not adequately addressed in the provided documentation. 88% Sound Quality 92% of users were impressed with the sound quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, noting its clear and crisp audio output as a standout feature. Users appreciated the low noise floor and high dynamic range, which contributed to professional-grade recordings and playback. 8% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, mentioning occasional latency issues and minor distortion at high volumes. Some users felt these issues hindered their recording sessions, especially in more complex setups. 92% Compatibility 87% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing its seamless integration with various DAWs and operating systems as a major advantage. Users appreciated the interface's ability to work well with both Mac and Windows platforms. 13% of users experienced compatibility issues, particularly with older software and certain operating systems. These users felt the need for more comprehensive support and updates to ensure smooth operation across all systems. 87% Portability 85% of users praised the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, highlighting its compact size and lightweight design. This made it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions or gigs, which was a significant plus for users frequently on the move. 15% of users found the portability lacking due to the need for additional equipment and cables, which added bulk to their setup. Some users also noted that the unit, despite being portable, could benefit from a more robust carrying case. 85% Durability 88% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often commenting on its sturdy construction. Many users reported the interface surviving frequent use and transportation without any significant wear and tear. 12% of users expressed concerns about durability, particularly regarding the long-term reliability of the knobs and switches. Some users experienced wear on these components sooner than expected, which affected their perception of the product's overall durability. 88% Aesthetics 90% of users were pleased with the aesthetics of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often mentioning its sleek and modern design. The red metallic finish was a particular highlight, giving it a professional and appealing look that fit well in any studio setup. 10% of users were less impressed with the aesthetics, feeling that the design, while functional, lacked uniqueness or distinction compared to other models on the market. Some users suggested more color options could enhance its visual appeal. 90% Customer Support 82% of users praised Focusrite's customer support, mentioning prompt responses and helpful assistance with technical inquiries. Users felt confident in reaching out for help, knowing they would receive knowledgeable guidance to resolve their issues. 18% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses and unhelpful troubleshooting advice. These users expressed frustration with the lack of immediate support, especially when dealing with urgent technical problems. 82% Latency 89% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found it capable of handling real-time monitoring and recording without noticeable delays, which was crucial for professional audio work. 11% of users experienced latency issues that affected their recording sessions. These users reported that the latency was more pronounced in complex audio setups, which hindered their ability to perform tasks efficiently. 89% Driver Stability 83% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The majority of users reported consistent performance with minimal crashes or connectivity issues, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions. 17% of users experienced driver stability issues, including crashes and disconnections, which impacted their workflow. These users felt that more frequent driver updates could help mitigate such problems and improve overall reliability. 83% Preamp Quality 91% of users were highly satisfied with the preamp quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted the clean and transparent sound the preamps provided, which allowed for accurate capture of vocals and instruments without coloration. 9% of users found the preamp quality lacking, especially when compared to higher-end interfaces. These users felt that the preamps could offer more headroom and warmth for certain recording applications. 91% Software Bundle 86% of users appreciated the software bundle included with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the DAW and plugin offerings to be a valuable addition that enhanced their recording and production capabilities right out of the box. 14% of users were dissatisfied with the software bundle, mentioning that the options were limited or not suitable for their specific needs. Some users expressed a desire for more advanced software inclusions to better complement the hardware. 86% Input/Output Options 84% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The dual XLR/line inputs and headphone output met most users' requirements for basic recording setups. 16% of users felt limited by the input/output options, especially those needing more channels for larger recording sessions. These users suggested that additional input and output capabilities could significantly enhance the interface's versatility. 84% Phantom Power 87% of users appreciated the inclusion of phantom power on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, enabling them to use condenser microphones effectively. This feature was deemed essential for achieving high-quality recordings with a variety of mic types. 13% of users encountered issues with phantom power, such as inconsistent delivery or compatibility problems with specific microphones. These users felt that improvements in this area could enhance the interface's performance with a wider range of equipment. 87% USB-C Connectivity 89% of users were pleased with the USB-C connectivity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Audio Interface, noting the faster data transfer and improved power efficiency. This feature was especially appreciated by users with modern computing setups, providing a seamless connection experience. 11% of users experienced connectivity issues related to USB-C, particularly with certain cables or ports not functioning as expected. These users suggested that clearer guidance on compatible cables and ports could alleviate such problems. 89% Overall Satisfaction 88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing it as a reliable and high-performance tool for their audio needs. The combination of quality, ease of use, and value made it a favored choice among musicians and producers. 12% of users were not fully satisfied with the overall experience, often due to isolated issues or unmet expectations in specific areas such as advanced features or extended support. These users felt that addressing these minor grievances could elevate the product to an even higher standard. 88% Recording Quality 91% of users were highly satisfied with the recording quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted its ability to capture detailed and accurate audio, making it suitable for various applications from podcasts to music production. 9% of users felt that the recording quality could be improved, particularly in terms of dynamic range and noise reduction. These users desired enhancements that would allow for even cleaner recordings in professional environments. 91% Monitor Control 86% of users appreciated the monitor control features of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, particularly the direct monitor switch and volume control. These features allowed for effective monitoring and adjustments during recording sessions, which users found extremely beneficial. 14% of users experienced issues with monitor control, such as limited control over headphone mix levels. These users suggested that more advanced monitoring options could improve the interface's usability in complex setups. 86% Updates and Support 80% of users were satisfied with the updates and support provided for the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the ongoing driver updates and support resources available, which helped maintain the interface's performance over time. 20% of users were dissatisfied with the frequency and quality of updates and support. These users felt that the update process was not as streamlined or timely as needed, leading to occasional compatibility or performance issues. 80% Product Longevity 87% of users were satisfied with the product longevity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, reporting that it remained functional and reliable over extended periods of use. This aspect contributed to users' confidence in their investment. 13% of users experienced issues with product longevity, noting that certain components like jacks or switches showed signs of wear sooner than expected. These users suggested that enhancements in component durability could further improve the product's lifespan. 87%	Purchase Value 85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation). Many appreciated its affordability compared to similar products on the market, noting it provides a professional quality audio experience at a budget-friendly price. The inclusion of essential features like the improved preamps and the Air mode were frequently highlighted as excellent value additions. 15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to expectations of more features that are available in higher-priced models. Some users felt that the lack of bundled accessories, such as cables or software, diminished the overall value of the purchase. 85% Quality of Material 90% of users found the quality of material to be excellent. They praised the build quality, noting that the device feels sturdy and durable. The metal chassis was particularly appreciated for providing a robust feel, which users associated with longevity and reliability. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of material. Some reported issues with the durability of the knobs and connectors, mentioning that they felt less sturdy over time. A few users experienced problems with the USB-C connection, citing it as a potential weak point in the design. 90% Ease of Use 88% of users were satisfied with the ease of use of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They commended its straightforward setup process and user-friendly design, which allowed even beginners to start recording with minimal effort. The clear labeling and intuitive layout were also frequently praised. 12% of users found the device less user-friendly than expected. Some had difficulty with the initial setup, especially when integrating with specific DAWs. Others noted that the lack of a detailed manual made troubleshooting more challenging for less experienced users. 88% Sound Quality 92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They reported clear, professional-grade audio output, with many appreciating the enhanced quality of the preamps and the Air mode, which added a noticeable brightness and clarity to their recordings. 8% of users were not fully satisfied with the sound quality. Some mentioned that while the device generally performed well, it occasionally introduced noise or interference at higher gain levels. A few users expected even more pristine audio quality based on the brand's reputation. 92% Connectivity 87% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the USB-C interface for its modern, fast, and reliable connection. Users found it easy to integrate the device with various recording setups and appreciated the low-latency performance. 13% of users faced issues with connectivity. Some experienced occasional disconnections or difficulty maintaining a stable connection, particularly when using older computer systems. A few users also noted limitations due to the lack of additional input/output options, which restricted more complex recording setups. 87% Software Integration 83% of users were pleased with the software integration capabilities of the Scarlett Solo. Many highlighted the seamless compatibility with popular DAWs and the ease of accessing bundled software as a significant advantage. 17% of users encountered challenges with software integration. Some reported difficulties in setting up the interface with their preferred DAW, citing lack of clear instructions or driver issues. Others were disappointed with the limited functionality of the bundled software compared to standalone options. 83% Portability 89% of users appreciated the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. Its compact size and lightweight design were ideal for users who needed a mobile recording solution, making it easy to transport and use in various locations. 11% of users found the device less portable due to its reliance on a computer connection for power. Some expressed a desire for a battery-powered option to enhance portability. Additionally, a few users noted that additional protective cases or covers were necessary for safe transport. 89% Durability 91% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its solid construction and the high-quality materials used, which gave them confidence in its long-term performance and resistance to wear and tear. 9% of users had concerns about durability, particularly with the smaller components like knobs and jacks, which some users reported were prone to loosening over time. A few users experienced issues with the USB-C port becoming less secure after repeated use. 91% Aesthetic Design 93% of users were highly satisfied with the aesthetic design of the Scarlett Solo. They found it visually appealing, with a sleek, modern look that fit well into professional and home studio environments. The color scheme and overall design were frequently highlighted as stylish. 7% of users were less impressed with the design, mainly due to personal preferences. Some felt that while the design was functional, it lacked uniqueness or standout features compared to other brands. A few users were also concerned about the potential for visible wear over time. 93% Customer Support 84% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Focusrite. Many appreciated the prompt and helpful responses they received when encountering issues, as well as the availability of online resources and tutorials. 16% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing long wait times and unhelpful responses in some cases. A few users felt that the support team lacked the technical knowledge needed to resolve more complex issues efficiently. 84% Latency 88% of users praised the low latency performance of the Scarlett Solo. They reported minimal delay during recording and playback, which was crucial for live monitoring and multi-track recording sessions. 12% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older or less powerful computers. Some users found that the advertised low latency was not always achievable without additional configuration or adjustments in their DAW settings. 88% Preamps 90% of users were impressed with the quality of the preamps in the Scarlett Solo. They noted a significant improvement in audio clarity and detail, with many highlighting the preamps as a standout feature of the device. 10% of users found the preamps less impressive, noting that they introduced noise at higher gain levels. Some users expected better performance based on their experiences with other products in the Focusrite range. 90% Driver Stability 86% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Scarlett Solo. They reported consistent performance and reliability across different operating systems, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions. 14% of users encountered issues with driver stability, experiencing occasional crashes or compatibility problems with certain software updates. Some users found the process of updating drivers cumbersome or confusing. 86% Input/Output Options 80% of users were content with the input/output options provided by the Scarlett Solo. They found the available connections sufficient for basic recording needs and appreciated the simplicity of the layout. 20% of users desired more input/output options, especially those looking to expand their recording capabilities. Some users felt limited by the lack of additional ports for more complex setups or simultaneous multi-instrument recording. 80% Brand Reputation 95% of users expressed trust in Focusrite's brand reputation, noting their history of producing reliable and high-quality audio interfaces. Many users mentioned that the brand's positive reputation influenced their purchase decision. 5% of users were skeptical about the brand reputation, often due to personal negative experiences or issues with previous products. A few users felt that the brand's reputation did not always translate to superior customer support or product innovation. 95% Compatibility 88% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Scarlett Solo with various systems and software. They found it easy to integrate with both Windows and Mac operating systems, as well as with popular DAWs. 12% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly when using less common DAWs or older operating systems. Some users encountered problems with driver installation or configuration, which affected their initial setup experience. 88% Setup Process 87% of users found the setup process for the Scarlett Solo to be straightforward. They appreciated the clear instructions and quick installation process, which allowed them to start using the device with minimal hassle. 13% of users encountered difficulties during setup. Some reported unclear instructions or missing steps in the setup guide, which led to a more complicated installation process. A few users required additional support to resolve initial setup issues. 87% Firmware Updates 82% of users were satisfied with the availability and effectiveness of firmware updates for the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the improvements in performance and functionality that updates provided, helping to maintain the device's reliability. 18% of users were dissatisfied with the firmware update process. Some found it difficult to navigate or encountered issues with updates failing to install properly. Others felt that updates were infrequent or did not address key issues they experienced. 82% Instruction Manual 78% of users found the instruction manual helpful for basic setup and operation. They appreciated the inclusion of essential information that aided in understanding the device's core functions. 22% of users were dissatisfied with the instruction manual, citing it as lacking in detail or clarity. Some users found it insufficient for troubleshooting more complex issues or for understanding advanced features of the device. 78% Overall Performance 89% of users were satisfied with the overall performance of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its reliability, sound quality, and ease of use, which met or exceeded their expectations for a USB audio interface in its price range. 11% of users were less satisfied with the overall performance, often due to specific issues like connectivity problems or noise at high gain levels. Some users felt that while the device performed well generally, it did not excel in any particular area compared to higher-end models. 89% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the balance between affordability and functionality, making it an excellent choice for both beginners and professionals. Users frequently mentioned the interface's reliable performance and the included software bundle as significant advantages, offering great value for the price.

15% of users were dissatisfied with the purchase value, citing that they expected more advanced features for the price. Some users felt that the interface could be more competitively priced considering the available alternatives in the market.

85%
Quality of Materials

90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The robust build and durable metal casing were frequently highlighted as key factors contributing to a sense of reliability and longevity. Users appreciated the premium feel of the dials and connectors, which enhanced their overall experience.

10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of materials, noting that some components felt slightly less durable over time. A few users reported issues with the plastic parts, which they felt did not match the rest of the product's build quality.

90%
Ease of Use

88% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface easy to use. They praised its intuitive design and straightforward setup process, making it accessible to users of varying expertise levels. The clear labeling and simple control layout were appreciated as they allowed users to quickly adjust settings without confusion.

12% of users were dissatisfied with the ease of use, primarily due to difficulties encountered during initial setup. These users reported issues with drivers and software installation, which they felt were not adequately addressed in the provided documentation.

88%
Sound Quality

92% of users were impressed with the sound quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, noting its clear and crisp audio output as a standout feature. Users appreciated the low noise floor and high dynamic range, which contributed to professional-grade recordings and playback.

8% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, mentioning occasional latency issues and minor distortion at high volumes. Some users felt these issues hindered their recording sessions, especially in more complex setups.

92%
Compatibility

87% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing its seamless integration with various DAWs and operating systems as a major advantage. Users appreciated the interface's ability to work well with both Mac and Windows platforms.

13% of users experienced compatibility issues, particularly with older software and certain operating systems. These users felt the need for more comprehensive support and updates to ensure smooth operation across all systems.

87%
Portability

85% of users praised the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, highlighting its compact size and lightweight design. This made it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions or gigs, which was a significant plus for users frequently on the move.

15% of users found the portability lacking due to the need for additional equipment and cables, which added bulk to their setup. Some users also noted that the unit, despite being portable, could benefit from a more robust carrying case.

85%
Durability

88% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often commenting on its sturdy construction. Many users reported the interface surviving frequent use and transportation without any significant wear and tear.

12% of users expressed concerns about durability, particularly regarding the long-term reliability of the knobs and switches. Some users experienced wear on these components sooner than expected, which affected their perception of the product's overall durability.

88%
Aesthetics

90% of users were pleased with the aesthetics of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often mentioning its sleek and modern design. The red metallic finish was a particular highlight, giving it a professional and appealing look that fit well in any studio setup.

10% of users were less impressed with the aesthetics, feeling that the design, while functional, lacked uniqueness or distinction compared to other models on the market. Some users suggested more color options could enhance its visual appeal.

90%
Customer Support

82% of users praised Focusrite's customer support, mentioning prompt responses and helpful assistance with technical inquiries. Users felt confident in reaching out for help, knowing they would receive knowledgeable guidance to resolve their issues.

18% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses and unhelpful troubleshooting advice. These users expressed frustration with the lack of immediate support, especially when dealing with urgent technical problems.

82%
Latency

89% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found it capable of handling real-time monitoring and recording without noticeable delays, which was crucial for professional audio work.

11% of users experienced latency issues that affected their recording sessions. These users reported that the latency was more pronounced in complex audio setups, which hindered their ability to perform tasks efficiently.

89%
Driver Stability

83% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The majority of users reported consistent performance with minimal crashes or connectivity issues, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions.

17% of users experienced driver stability issues, including crashes and disconnections, which impacted their workflow. These users felt that more frequent driver updates could help mitigate such problems and improve overall reliability.

83%
Preamp Quality

91% of users were highly satisfied with the preamp quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted the clean and transparent sound the preamps provided, which allowed for accurate capture of vocals and instruments without coloration.

9% of users found the preamp quality lacking, especially when compared to higher-end interfaces. These users felt that the preamps could offer more headroom and warmth for certain recording applications.

91%
Software Bundle

86% of users appreciated the software bundle included with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the DAW and plugin offerings to be a valuable addition that enhanced their recording and production capabilities right out of the box.

14% of users were dissatisfied with the software bundle, mentioning that the options were limited or not suitable for their specific needs. Some users expressed a desire for more advanced software inclusions to better complement the hardware.

86%
Input/Output Options

84% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The dual XLR/line inputs and headphone output met most users' requirements for basic recording setups.

16% of users felt limited by the input/output options, especially those needing more channels for larger recording sessions. These users suggested that additional input and output capabilities could significantly enhance the interface's versatility.

84%
Phantom Power

87% of users appreciated the inclusion of phantom power on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, enabling them to use condenser microphones effectively. This feature was deemed essential for achieving high-quality recordings with a variety of mic types.

13% of users encountered issues with phantom power, such as inconsistent delivery or compatibility problems with specific microphones. These users felt that improvements in this area could enhance the interface's performance with a wider range of equipment.

87%
USB-C Connectivity

89% of users were pleased with the USB-C connectivity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Audio Interface, noting the faster data transfer and improved power efficiency. This feature was especially appreciated by users with modern computing setups, providing a seamless connection experience.

11% of users experienced connectivity issues related to USB-C, particularly with certain cables or ports not functioning as expected. These users suggested that clearer guidance on compatible cables and ports could alleviate such problems.

89%
Overall Satisfaction

88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing it as a reliable and high-performance tool for their audio needs. The combination of quality, ease of use, and value made it a favored choice among musicians and producers.

12% of users were not fully satisfied with the overall experience, often due to isolated issues or unmet expectations in specific areas such as advanced features or extended support. These users felt that addressing these minor grievances could elevate the product to an even higher standard.

88%
Recording Quality

91% of users were highly satisfied with the recording quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted its ability to capture detailed and accurate audio, making it suitable for various applications from podcasts to music production.

9% of users felt that the recording quality could be improved, particularly in terms of dynamic range and noise reduction. These users desired enhancements that would allow for even cleaner recordings in professional environments.

91%
Monitor Control

86% of users appreciated the monitor control features of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, particularly the direct monitor switch and volume control. These features allowed for effective monitoring and adjustments during recording sessions, which users found extremely beneficial.

14% of users experienced issues with monitor control, such as limited control over headphone mix levels. These users suggested that more advanced monitoring options could improve the interface's usability in complex setups.

86%
Updates and Support

80% of users were satisfied with the updates and support provided for the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the ongoing driver updates and support resources available, which helped maintain the interface's performance over time.

20% of users were dissatisfied with the frequency and quality of updates and support. These users felt that the update process was not as streamlined or timely as needed, leading to occasional compatibility or performance issues.

80%
Product Longevity

87% of users were satisfied with the product longevity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, reporting that it remained functional and reliable over extended periods of use. This aspect contributed to users' confidence in their investment.

13% of users experienced issues with product longevity, noting that certain components like jacks or switches showed signs of wear sooner than expected. These users suggested that enhancements in component durability could further improve the product's lifespan.

87%

Purchase Value

85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation). Many appreciated its affordability compared to similar products on the market, noting it provides a professional quality audio experience at a budget-friendly price. The inclusion of essential features like the improved preamps and the Air mode were frequently highlighted as excellent value additions.

15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to expectations of more features that are available in higher-priced models. Some users felt that the lack of bundled accessories, such as cables or software, diminished the overall value of the purchase.

85%
Quality of Material

90% of users found the quality of material to be excellent. They praised the build quality, noting that the device feels sturdy and durable. The metal chassis was particularly appreciated for providing a robust feel, which users associated with longevity and reliability.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of material. Some reported issues with the durability of the knobs and connectors, mentioning that they felt less sturdy over time. A few users experienced problems with the USB-C connection, citing it as a potential weak point in the design.

90%
Ease of Use

88% of users were satisfied with the ease of use of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They commended its straightforward setup process and user-friendly design, which allowed even beginners to start recording with minimal effort. The clear labeling and intuitive layout were also frequently praised.

12% of users found the device less user-friendly than expected. Some had difficulty with the initial setup, especially when integrating with specific DAWs. Others noted that the lack of a detailed manual made troubleshooting more challenging for less experienced users.

88%
Sound Quality

92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They reported clear, professional-grade audio output, with many appreciating the enhanced quality of the preamps and the Air mode, which added a noticeable brightness and clarity to their recordings.

8% of users were not fully satisfied with the sound quality. Some mentioned that while the device generally performed well, it occasionally introduced noise or interference at higher gain levels. A few users expected even more pristine audio quality based on the brand's reputation.

92%
Connectivity

87% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the USB-C interface for its modern, fast, and reliable connection. Users found it easy to integrate the device with various recording setups and appreciated the low-latency performance.

13% of users faced issues with connectivity. Some experienced occasional disconnections or difficulty maintaining a stable connection, particularly when using older computer systems. A few users also noted limitations due to the lack of additional input/output options, which restricted more complex recording setups.

87%
Software Integration

83% of users were pleased with the software integration capabilities of the Scarlett Solo. Many highlighted the seamless compatibility with popular DAWs and the ease of accessing bundled software as a significant advantage.

17% of users encountered challenges with software integration. Some reported difficulties in setting up the interface with their preferred DAW, citing lack of clear instructions or driver issues. Others were disappointed with the limited functionality of the bundled software compared to standalone options.

83%
Portability

89% of users appreciated the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. Its compact size and lightweight design were ideal for users who needed a mobile recording solution, making it easy to transport and use in various locations.

11% of users found the device less portable due to its reliance on a computer connection for power. Some expressed a desire for a battery-powered option to enhance portability. Additionally, a few users noted that additional protective cases or covers were necessary for safe transport.

89%
Durability

91% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its solid construction and the high-quality materials used, which gave them confidence in its long-term performance and resistance to wear and tear.

9% of users had concerns about durability, particularly with the smaller components like knobs and jacks, which some users reported were prone to loosening over time. A few users experienced issues with the USB-C port becoming less secure after repeated use.

91%
Aesthetic Design

93% of users were highly satisfied with the aesthetic design of the Scarlett Solo. They found it visually appealing, with a sleek, modern look that fit well into professional and home studio environments. The color scheme and overall design were frequently highlighted as stylish.

7% of users were less impressed with the design, mainly due to personal preferences. Some felt that while the design was functional, it lacked uniqueness or standout features compared to other brands. A few users were also concerned about the potential for visible wear over time.

93%
Customer Support

84% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Focusrite. Many appreciated the prompt and helpful responses they received when encountering issues, as well as the availability of online resources and tutorials.

16% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing long wait times and unhelpful responses in some cases. A few users felt that the support team lacked the technical knowledge needed to resolve more complex issues efficiently.

84%
Latency

88% of users praised the low latency performance of the Scarlett Solo. They reported minimal delay during recording and playback, which was crucial for live monitoring and multi-track recording sessions.

12% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older or less powerful computers. Some users found that the advertised low latency was not always achievable without additional configuration or adjustments in their DAW settings.

88%
Preamps

90% of users were impressed with the quality of the preamps in the Scarlett Solo. They noted a significant improvement in audio clarity and detail, with many highlighting the preamps as a standout feature of the device.

10% of users found the preamps less impressive, noting that they introduced noise at higher gain levels. Some users expected better performance based on their experiences with other products in the Focusrite range.

90%
Driver Stability

86% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Scarlett Solo. They reported consistent performance and reliability across different operating systems, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions.

14% of users encountered issues with driver stability, experiencing occasional crashes or compatibility problems with certain software updates. Some users found the process of updating drivers cumbersome or confusing.

86%
Input/Output Options

80% of users were content with the input/output options provided by the Scarlett Solo. They found the available connections sufficient for basic recording needs and appreciated the simplicity of the layout.

20% of users desired more input/output options, especially those looking to expand their recording capabilities. Some users felt limited by the lack of additional ports for more complex setups or simultaneous multi-instrument recording.

80%
Brand Reputation

95% of users expressed trust in Focusrite's brand reputation, noting their history of producing reliable and high-quality audio interfaces. Many users mentioned that the brand's positive reputation influenced their purchase decision.

5% of users were skeptical about the brand reputation, often due to personal negative experiences or issues with previous products. A few users felt that the brand's reputation did not always translate to superior customer support or product innovation.

95%
Compatibility

88% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Scarlett Solo with various systems and software. They found it easy to integrate with both Windows and Mac operating systems, as well as with popular DAWs.

12% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly when using less common DAWs or older operating systems. Some users encountered problems with driver installation or configuration, which affected their initial setup experience.

88%
Setup Process

87% of users found the setup process for the Scarlett Solo to be straightforward. They appreciated the clear instructions and quick installation process, which allowed them to start using the device with minimal hassle.

13% of users encountered difficulties during setup. Some reported unclear instructions or missing steps in the setup guide, which led to a more complicated installation process. A few users required additional support to resolve initial setup issues.

87%
Firmware Updates

82% of users were satisfied with the availability and effectiveness of firmware updates for the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the improvements in performance and functionality that updates provided, helping to maintain the device's reliability.

18% of users were dissatisfied with the firmware update process. Some found it difficult to navigate or encountered issues with updates failing to install properly. Others felt that updates were infrequent or did not address key issues they experienced.

82%
Instruction Manual

78% of users found the instruction manual helpful for basic setup and operation. They appreciated the inclusion of essential information that aided in understanding the device's core functions.

22% of users were dissatisfied with the instruction manual, citing it as lacking in detail or clarity. Some users found it insufficient for troubleshooting more complex issues or for understanding advanced features of the device.

78%
Overall Performance

89% of users were satisfied with the overall performance of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its reliability, sound quality, and ease of use, which met or exceeded their expectations for a USB audio interface in its price range.

11% of users were less satisfied with the overall performance, often due to specific issues like connectivity problems or noise at high gain levels. Some users felt that while the device performed well generally, it did not excel in any particular area compared to higher-end models.

89%

Pros:
High-quality preamps for clear audio capture. USB-C connectivity for faster data transfer and compatibility. Compact and portable design. Low latency monitoring. Easy setup and user-friendly interface.	High-quality preamps for clear sound recording. USB-C connectivity provides fast and reliable data transfer. Compact and portable design. Easy to use with straightforward controls and setup. Included software package offers great value.

Cons:
Limited to two inputs, which may not be enough for some users. No MIDI input/output. Higher price point compared to some competitors. Requires external power when used with some devices.	Limited to 2 input channels, which may not suffice for larger setups. No MIDI input/output ports. Phantom power is not individually switchable for each input. Higher price compared to some entry-level audio interfaces. Requires a computer to function, not standalone.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2	1
Analog Audio I/O
2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)	1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Digital Audio I/O

Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
OS Compatibility
macOS Windows	macOS Windows
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)	USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) share several common features but also have key differences that cater to different user needs.
Both interfaces offer a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit resolution and are equipped with USB-C connectivity, ensuring high-speed data transfer and compatibility with both macOS and Windows operating systems. Additionally, both devices are powered via USB bus power, though they can also utilize a USB power adapter, which is not included with either product.
In terms of analog audio input and output, the Scarlett 2i2 offers more versatility. It features two XLR 3-pin balanced mic inputs and two 1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced line/Hi-Z inputs on the front panel. This makes the Scarlett 2i2 suited for users who need to record multiple sources simultaneously, such as a vocalist and an instrument. It also comes with two 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs and a 1/4" TRS headphone output on the front panel, allowing for more flexible monitoring options.
On the other hand, the Scarlett Solo is geared towards solo recording artists or podcasters. It provides one XLR 3-pin balanced mic input and one 1/4" TS unbalanced line/Hi-Z input on the front panel. While it also features two 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs and a 1/4" TRS headphone output, the lack of a second mic input makes it less suitable for recording multiple sources simultaneously.
Overall, the Scarlett 2i2 is more versatile with its additional input capabilities, making it ideal for more complex recording setups. The Scarlett Solo, however, offers a more streamlined interface for solo artists or podcasters who do not need multiple mic inputs. Both interfaces maintain Focusrite's reputation for high-quality audio and user-friendly design.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Built-In DSP

Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2	1
Built-In Microphone

Input Level Adjustment
2x Knob	2x Knob
Expansion Slots

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) both offer high-quality 192 kHz / 24-bit audio resolution, making them suitable for professional and home studio recording. Both interfaces lack built-in DSP and expansion slots, and neither comes with a built-in microphone, ensuring a streamlined and focused recording experience.
The most notable difference between the two models lies in their input configurations. The Scarlett 2i2 features two microphone inputs, allowing for greater flexibility when recording vocals and instruments simultaneously. In contrast, the Scarlett Solo offers only one microphone input, which might limit its use in scenarios requiring multiple microphones.
Both models come equipped with two input level adjustment knobs, providing precise control over the input signal levels. Additionally, both interfaces feature analog I/O channels with 2 inputs and 2 outputs, ensuring consistent performance across various recording and playback scenarios. Despite the differences in the number of microphone inputs, both interfaces maintain the same high standard of audio quality and functionality, catering to different recording needs.

Signal Processing
Gain/Trim Range
Mic/Line Inputs: Up to +69 dB Hi-Z Inputs: 62 dB	Mic/Line Inputs: Up to +69 dB Hi-Z Inputs: 62 dB

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) both share identical specifications in terms of Gain/Trim Range. Both models feature a Mic/Line Inputs gain range of up to +69 dB and Hi-Z Inputs gain range of up to 62 dB. This consistency in gain/trim range ensures that users of either interface can expect similar performance when it comes to adjusting input levels for microphones and instruments.
The Scarlett 2i2, however, offers two combined XLR/line inputs, which makes it more versatile for recording multiple instruments or vocal and instrument combinations simultaneously. On the other hand, the Scarlett Solo is designed with a single XLR input and a single line/instrument input, making it more suitable for solo musicians or podcasters who primarily need to record one input at a time.
In summary, while both interfaces provide the same gain/trim range capabilities, the Scarlett 2i2 offers more input flexibility compared to the Scarlett Solo, catering to users who require dual input recording. The choice between the two would depend on the specific recording needs of the user.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)	1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Phantom Power
48 V, Selectable On/Off	48 V, Selectable On/Off
Digital Audio I/O

Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0	USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)
1x USB-C (Power Input)
Sync I/O

Network I/O

MIDI I/O

Wireless

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) cater to different needs and come with distinct features, though they share some common elements.
In terms of analog audio I/O, the Scarlett 2i2 offers more versatility with 2x XLR 3-pin balanced mic inputs and 2x 1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced line/Hi-Z inputs on the front panel. This allows for greater flexibility in connecting a variety of instruments and microphones simultaneously. In contrast, the Scarlett Solo provides 1x XLR 3-pin balanced mic input and 1x 1/4" TS unbalanced line/Hi-Z input on the front panel, which may be sufficient for solo artists or podcasters who require fewer input options.
Both interfaces feature 2x 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs and 1x 1/4" TRS headphone output on the front panel, ensuring that users can monitor their audio with precision and clarity. Additionally, both models support 48V phantom power, which can be toggled on or off, making them suitable for use with condenser microphones that require external power.
For connectivity, both the Scarlett 2i2 and Scarlett Solo utilize a USB-C host connection with USB 2.0 protocol, ensuring fast and reliable data transfer to a computer or other recording device. However, the Scarlett 2i2 includes an additional USB-C port for power input, which can provide enhanced stability for longer recording sessions. The Scarlett Solo does not include this additional power input, relying solely on its host connection for power.
Neither the Scarlett 2i2 nor the Scarlett Solo includes digital audio I/O, sync I/O, network I/O, MIDI I/O, or wireless capabilities. This makes both interfaces straightforward and focused on delivering high-quality analog audio inputs and outputs without additional digital or network complexities.
In summary, the Scarlett 2i2 offers more input options and an additional power input, making it a versatile choice for users who need to connect multiple audio sources. The Scarlett Solo, on the other hand, provides a simplified setup ideal for solo artists or those with minimal input requirements. Both models maintain high-quality audio performance and essential monitoring features, meeting the needs of different user profiles effectively.

Performance
Frequency Response
XLR Mic Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB 1/4" Line Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.05 dB 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.15 dB	XLR Mic Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB 1/4" Line Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.05 dB 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.15 dB
Maximum Input Level
XLR Mic: 16 dBu 1/4" Line: 22 dBu 1/4" Hi-Z: 12 dBu	XLR Mic: 9.5 dBu 1/4" Line: 22 dBu 1/4" Hi-Z: 12 dBu
Maximum Output Level
1/4" Line: +16 dBu	1/4" Line: +16 dBu
Headphone Output Power
1/4": 32 mW into 33 Ohms 22 mW into 300 Ohms	1/4": 32 mW into 33 Ohms 22 mW into 300 Ohms
Impedance
XLR Mic Inputs: 3 Kilohms 1/4" Line Inputs: 60 Kilohms 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohms 1/4" Line Outputs: 100 Ohms 1/4" Headphone Outputs: < 50 Ohm	XLR Mic Inputs: 3 Kilohms 1/4" Line Inputs: 60 Kilohms 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohms 1/4" Line Outputs: 200 Ohms 1/4" Headphone Outputs: < 50 Ohm
Dynamic Range
XLR Mic Inputs: 116 dBA 1/4" Line Inputs: 115.2 dBA 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 113 dBA 1/4" Line Outputs: 120 dB 1/4" Headphone: 112 dB (at 33 Ohms) 115 dB (at 300 Ohms) Digital A/D Converters: 120 dB Digital D/A Converters: 130 dBA	XLR Mic Inputs: 113 dBA 1/4" Line Inputs: 113 dBA 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 112 dBA 1/4" Line Outputs: 120 dB 1/4" Headphone: 112 dB (at 33 Ohms) 115 dB (at 300 Ohms) Digital A/D Converters: 120 dB Digital D/A Converters: 130 dBA
THD+N
XLR Mic Inputs: -100 dB (at 8 dB Gain) 1/4" Line Inputs: -100 dB (at 8 dB Gain) 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: -80 dB (at Minimum Gain) 1/4" Line Outputs: -109 dB 1/4" Headphone Outputs: -99 dB (at 33 Ohms) -108 dB (at 300 Ohms) Digital A/D Converters: -110 dB Digital D/A Converters: -115 dB	XLR Mic Inputs: -100 dB (at Minimum Gain) 1/4" Line Inputs: -100 dB (at 8 dB Gain) 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: -80 dB (at Minimum Gain) 1/4" Line Outputs: -100 dB (at Minimum Gain) 1/4" Headphone Outputs: -97 dB (at 33 Ohms) -102 dB (at 300 Ohms) Digital A/D Converters: -110 dB Digital D/A Converters: -115 dB
EIN
XLR Mic Inputs: -127 dBu A-Weighted	XLR Mic Inputs: -127 dBu A-Weighted

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) both offer high-quality audio performance, but they have distinct differences that cater to different user needs.
In terms of frequency response, both interfaces are virtually identical. The XLR mic inputs for both models have a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz with a variance of ±0.06 dB. The 1/4" line inputs have a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz with a variance of 0.05 dB, and the 1/4" Hi-Z inputs have a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz with a variance of 0.15 dB.
When comparing the maximum input levels, the Scarlett 2i2 offers a higher maximum input level for XLR mic inputs at 16 dBu, compared to the Scarlett Solo's 9.5 dBu. Both models have identical maximum input levels for the 1/4" line inputs (22 dBu) and the 1/4" Hi-Z inputs (12 dBu). The maximum output level for both interfaces is the same at +16 dBu for the 1/4" line outputs.
The headphone output power is also identical between the two models, offering 32 mW into 33 Ohms and 22 mW into 300 Ohms. However, there is a difference in impedance for the 1/4" line outputs, where the Scarlett 2i2 has an impedance of 100 Ohms compared to the Scarlett Solo's 200 Ohms. Both models share the same headphone output impedance of < 50 Ohms.
In terms of dynamic range, the Scarlett 2i2 has a slightly higher dynamic range for its XLR mic inputs (116 dBA) compared to the Scarlett Solo (113 dBA). The dynamic range for the 1/4" line and Hi-Z inputs, as well as for the headphone outputs at different impedances, are the same across both models. The digital A/D and D/A converters in both interfaces offer a dynamic range of 120 dB and 130 dBA, respectively.
The Total Harmonic Distortion plus Noise (THD+N) values are quite similar in both interfaces. For XLR mic inputs at minimum gain, both models have a THD+N of -100 dB. The Scarlett Solo has a slightly lower THD+N for 1/4" line inputs at minimum gain (-100 dB) compared to the Scarlett 2i2's -100 dB at 8 dB gain. Both models have the same THD+N for 1/4" Hi-Z inputs (-80 dB) and for digital A/D and D/A converters (-110 dB and -115 dB, respectively).
Lastly, the Equivalent Input Noise (EIN) for the XLR mic inputs is identical in both models, rated at -127 dBu A-weighted.
In summary, while both the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 and Scarlett Solo share many identical specifications and high-quality audio performance, the Scarlett 2i2 offers higher maximum input levels for XLR mic inputs and a slightly higher dynamic range for XLR mic inputs. The Scarlett 2i2 might be a better choice for users needing more robust input handling and a slightly better dynamic range, while the Scarlett Solo remains an excellent option for users seeking a simpler and more cost-effective solution.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 / 176.4 / 192 kHz	44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 / 176.4 / 192 kHz
Bit Depths
24-Bit	24-Bit
Sync Sources
Internal	Internal

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) share several key features that make them both excellent choices for audio recording. Both interfaces support a range of sample rates, including 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, 176.4, and 192 kHz, ensuring high-quality audio capture. They also both offer a 24-bit depth, which provides a broad dynamic range and greater detail in recordings.
Additionally, both the Scarlett 2i2 and the Scarlett Solo use internal sync sources, which helps ensure stable and reliable performance without the need for external synchronization.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 and the Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Generation audio interfaces are virtually identical in terms of their sample rates, bit depths, and sync sources, making either a solid choice depending on the specific needs of the user.

Audio Storage & Playback
Media/Memory Card Slot

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) both do not feature a media/memory card slot. This specification is consistent across both models, indicating that neither device supports direct media or memory card usage.

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS Windows	macOS Windows
Mobile App Compatible
Yes: iPadOS Only	Yes: iPadOS Only

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) both boast impressive specifications, particularly in terms of OS compatibility and mobile app compatibility. Both interfaces are compatible with macOS and Windows operating systems, ensuring seamless integration with a variety of computer setups. This cross-platform compatibility makes either interface a versatile choice for users who switch between different operating systems or who work in collaborative environments with diverse tech ecosystems.
In addition to their OS compatibility, both the Scarlett 2i2 and the Scarlett Solo are mobile app compatible, specifically with iPadOS. This feature allows users to connect these interfaces to an iPad, enabling portable recording and editing capabilities. This is particularly beneficial for musicians, podcasters, and content creators who need to record high-quality audio on the go without being tethered to a desktop setup.
While the Scarlett 2i2 and Scarlett Solo share these core features, their primary differences lie in their input and output configurations, which are not detailed here but are crucial for users to consider based on their specific audio interface needs. However, when it comes to OS and mobile app compatibility, both interfaces offer the same level of support and flexibility.

Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)	USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)
AC/DC Power Adapter
5 VDC at 900 mA	5 VDC at 900 mA
Power Consumption
4.5 W	4.5 W

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) share identical specifications when it comes to power requirements. Both interfaces are powered via USB Bus Power and can also be powered using a USB Power Adapter, which is not included in the package. Additionally, both units support an AC/DC Power Adapter specification of 5 VDC at 900 mA.
In terms of power consumption, both the Scarlett 2i2 and the Scarlett Solo have a power consumption rate of 4.5 W. This indicates that they are equally efficient in their energy usage, making them suitable for portable and desktop recording setups where power efficiency may be a consideration.
Overall, when comparing the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 and the Focusrite Scarlett Solo in terms of power requirements and consumption, they are essentially the same. Both models provide the same flexibility and efficiency in their power usage, ensuring they can operate effectively in various recording environments.

Physical
Dimensions
7.1 x 4.6 x 1.87" / 18 x 11.7 x 4.75 cm	5.63 x 3.78 x 1.79" / 14.3 x 9.6 x 4.55 cm
Weight
1.3 lb / 595.0 g	0.8 lb / 363.0 g

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) differ significantly in terms of their dimensions and weight.
The Scarlett 2i2 measures 7.1 x 4.6 x 1.87 inches (18 x 11.7 x 4.75 cm) and weighs 1.3 lb (595.0 g). This makes it larger and heavier compared to the Scarlett Solo, which has dimensions of 5.63 x 3.78 x 1.79 inches (14.3 x 9.6 x 4.55 cm) and a weight of 0.8 lb (363.0 g). The Scarlett 2i2's increased size and weight suggest it may offer additional features or more robust build quality, making it more suitable for users who need a slightly more substantial and potentially more versatile audio interface.
Both interfaces feature USB-C connectivity, ensuring modern compatibility and fast data transfer rates. However, the Scarlett Solo, being more compact and lightweight, is likely aimed at musicians or content creators who prioritize portability and simplicity. In contrast, the Scarlett 2i2's larger footprint might appeal to those who require a more comprehensive interface for a stationary setup.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
1.9 lb	1.305 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
8.2 x 7 x 2.6"	7.2 x 6.1 x 2.5"

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) are two popular models in Focusrite's Scarlett range, each catering to slightly different needs. Both interfaces offer high-quality audio performance and are designed for ease of use, but they differ in several key areas.
In terms of physical dimensions and weight, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 is slightly larger and heavier. The package weight of the Scarlett 2i2 is 1.9 lb, and its box dimensions are 8.2 x 7 x 2.6 inches. On the other hand, the Scarlett Solo is more compact and lighter, with a package weight of 1.305 lb and box dimensions of 7.2 x 6.1 x 2.5 inches. This makes the Scarlett Solo a more portable option, ideal for users who need a more mobile setup.
Both models are equipped with USB-C connectivity, ensuring fast and reliable data transfer and compatibility with modern computers and devices. However, the Scarlett 2i2 typically offers more input and output options compared to the Scarlett Solo. The 2i2 model usually includes two inputs, allowing for the simultaneous recording of two sources, such as a microphone and an instrument. The Solo model, as the name suggests, is more minimalistic with typically a single input, making it suitable for solo artists or podcasters who only need to record one source at a time.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 4th Generation is a slightly larger and heavier interface with more input options, making it versatile for recording multiple sources simultaneously. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Generation, being more compact and lightweight, is ideal for users looking for a portable solution with basic recording needs. Both models, however, deliver the high-quality audio performance that Focusrite is known for.