M-Audio M-Track Duo vs Focusrite Scarlett 2i2: Which Audio Interface is Right for You?

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface both cater to musicians, podcasters, and home studio enthusiasts, but they serve slightly different needs and come with distinct features.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) is renowned for its exceptional audio quality, boasting a dynamic range of 120dB. This model features two award-winning mic preamps with switchable Air mode, which enhances high-end detail to give recordings a brighter, more spacious sound. The USB-C connectivity ensures low latency and high-speed data transfer, making it a reliable choice for modern setups. The Scarlett 2i2 also includes a comprehensive software bundle, featuring Ableton Live Lite, Pro Tools First, and a variety of plug-ins, providing a robust toolkit for music production.
In contrast, the M-Audio M-Track Duo is a more budget-friendly option, providing solid performance for its price range. It features two combo inputs with Crystal preamps, which offer clear and transparent sound. The M-Track Duo uses USB-B connectivity, which is slightly older technology compared to USB-C, but it still maintains reliable performance. This interface also supports direct monitoring with a dedicated switch, allowing users to hear their input signal with zero latency. While the software package is not as extensive as the Scarlett’s, it includes essential tools like MPC Beats, making it a great entry-level option.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) stands out with its superior audio quality, innovative Air mode, and extensive software bundle, making it ideal for professionals and serious hobbyists. The M-Audio M-Track Duo, on the other hand, offers excellent value with essential features and reliable performance, making it a solid choice for beginners or those on a budget. Each interface has its strengths, catering to different user needs and experience levels.

In-Depth Comparison: M-Audio M-Track Duo and Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen)

Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation)

M-Audio M-Track Duo

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the balance between affordability and functionality, making it an excellent choice for both beginners and professionals. Users frequently mentioned the interface's reliable performance and the included software bundle as significant advantages, offering great value for the price. 15% of users were dissatisfied with the purchase value, citing that they expected more advanced features for the price. Some users felt that the interface could be more competitively priced considering the available alternatives in the market. 85% Quality of Materials 90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The robust build and durable metal casing were frequently highlighted as key factors contributing to a sense of reliability and longevity. Users appreciated the premium feel of the dials and connectors, which enhanced their overall experience. 10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of materials, noting that some components felt slightly less durable over time. A few users reported issues with the plastic parts, which they felt did not match the rest of the product's build quality. 90% Ease of Use 88% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface easy to use. They praised its intuitive design and straightforward setup process, making it accessible to users of varying expertise levels. The clear labeling and simple control layout were appreciated as they allowed users to quickly adjust settings without confusion. 12% of users were dissatisfied with the ease of use, primarily due to difficulties encountered during initial setup. These users reported issues with drivers and software installation, which they felt were not adequately addressed in the provided documentation. 88% Sound Quality 92% of users were impressed with the sound quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, noting its clear and crisp audio output as a standout feature. Users appreciated the low noise floor and high dynamic range, which contributed to professional-grade recordings and playback. 8% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, mentioning occasional latency issues and minor distortion at high volumes. Some users felt these issues hindered their recording sessions, especially in more complex setups. 92% Compatibility 87% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing its seamless integration with various DAWs and operating systems as a major advantage. Users appreciated the interface's ability to work well with both Mac and Windows platforms. 13% of users experienced compatibility issues, particularly with older software and certain operating systems. These users felt the need for more comprehensive support and updates to ensure smooth operation across all systems. 87% Portability 85% of users praised the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, highlighting its compact size and lightweight design. This made it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions or gigs, which was a significant plus for users frequently on the move. 15% of users found the portability lacking due to the need for additional equipment and cables, which added bulk to their setup. Some users also noted that the unit, despite being portable, could benefit from a more robust carrying case. 85% Durability 88% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often commenting on its sturdy construction. Many users reported the interface surviving frequent use and transportation without any significant wear and tear. 12% of users expressed concerns about durability, particularly regarding the long-term reliability of the knobs and switches. Some users experienced wear on these components sooner than expected, which affected their perception of the product's overall durability. 88% Aesthetics 90% of users were pleased with the aesthetics of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often mentioning its sleek and modern design. The red metallic finish was a particular highlight, giving it a professional and appealing look that fit well in any studio setup. 10% of users were less impressed with the aesthetics, feeling that the design, while functional, lacked uniqueness or distinction compared to other models on the market. Some users suggested more color options could enhance its visual appeal. 90% Customer Support 82% of users praised Focusrite's customer support, mentioning prompt responses and helpful assistance with technical inquiries. Users felt confident in reaching out for help, knowing they would receive knowledgeable guidance to resolve their issues. 18% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses and unhelpful troubleshooting advice. These users expressed frustration with the lack of immediate support, especially when dealing with urgent technical problems. 82% Latency 89% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found it capable of handling real-time monitoring and recording without noticeable delays, which was crucial for professional audio work. 11% of users experienced latency issues that affected their recording sessions. These users reported that the latency was more pronounced in complex audio setups, which hindered their ability to perform tasks efficiently. 89% Driver Stability 83% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The majority of users reported consistent performance with minimal crashes or connectivity issues, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions. 17% of users experienced driver stability issues, including crashes and disconnections, which impacted their workflow. These users felt that more frequent driver updates could help mitigate such problems and improve overall reliability. 83% Preamp Quality 91% of users were highly satisfied with the preamp quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted the clean and transparent sound the preamps provided, which allowed for accurate capture of vocals and instruments without coloration. 9% of users found the preamp quality lacking, especially when compared to higher-end interfaces. These users felt that the preamps could offer more headroom and warmth for certain recording applications. 91% Software Bundle 86% of users appreciated the software bundle included with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the DAW and plugin offerings to be a valuable addition that enhanced their recording and production capabilities right out of the box. 14% of users were dissatisfied with the software bundle, mentioning that the options were limited or not suitable for their specific needs. Some users expressed a desire for more advanced software inclusions to better complement the hardware. 86% Input/Output Options 84% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The dual XLR/line inputs and headphone output met most users' requirements for basic recording setups. 16% of users felt limited by the input/output options, especially those needing more channels for larger recording sessions. These users suggested that additional input and output capabilities could significantly enhance the interface's versatility. 84% Phantom Power 87% of users appreciated the inclusion of phantom power on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, enabling them to use condenser microphones effectively. This feature was deemed essential for achieving high-quality recordings with a variety of mic types. 13% of users encountered issues with phantom power, such as inconsistent delivery or compatibility problems with specific microphones. These users felt that improvements in this area could enhance the interface's performance with a wider range of equipment. 87% USB-C Connectivity 89% of users were pleased with the USB-C connectivity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Audio Interface, noting the faster data transfer and improved power efficiency. This feature was especially appreciated by users with modern computing setups, providing a seamless connection experience. 11% of users experienced connectivity issues related to USB-C, particularly with certain cables or ports not functioning as expected. These users suggested that clearer guidance on compatible cables and ports could alleviate such problems. 89% Overall Satisfaction 88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing it as a reliable and high-performance tool for their audio needs. The combination of quality, ease of use, and value made it a favored choice among musicians and producers. 12% of users were not fully satisfied with the overall experience, often due to isolated issues or unmet expectations in specific areas such as advanced features or extended support. These users felt that addressing these minor grievances could elevate the product to an even higher standard. 88% Recording Quality 91% of users were highly satisfied with the recording quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted its ability to capture detailed and accurate audio, making it suitable for various applications from podcasts to music production. 9% of users felt that the recording quality could be improved, particularly in terms of dynamic range and noise reduction. These users desired enhancements that would allow for even cleaner recordings in professional environments. 91% Monitor Control 86% of users appreciated the monitor control features of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, particularly the direct monitor switch and volume control. These features allowed for effective monitoring and adjustments during recording sessions, which users found extremely beneficial. 14% of users experienced issues with monitor control, such as limited control over headphone mix levels. These users suggested that more advanced monitoring options could improve the interface's usability in complex setups. 86% Updates and Support 80% of users were satisfied with the updates and support provided for the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the ongoing driver updates and support resources available, which helped maintain the interface's performance over time. 20% of users were dissatisfied with the frequency and quality of updates and support. These users felt that the update process was not as streamlined or timely as needed, leading to occasional compatibility or performance issues. 80% Product Longevity 87% of users were satisfied with the product longevity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, reporting that it remained functional and reliable over extended periods of use. This aspect contributed to users' confidence in their investment. 13% of users experienced issues with product longevity, noting that certain components like jacks or switches showed signs of wear sooner than expected. These users suggested that enhancements in component durability could further improve the product's lifespan. 87%	Purchase Value 78% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface. Many users appreciated the affordable price point, stating that it offers excellent value for money given its features and functionality. Users found it to be a cost-effective solution for home recording and basic audio interface needs, making it an attractive option for beginners and hobbyists. 22% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, noting that despite its low cost, the device lacked some advanced features found in more expensive models. Some users felt that it did not meet their expectations for sound quality or build durability, leading them to question the long-term value of the investment. 78% Sound Quality 75% of users were happy with the sound quality delivered by the M-Track Duo. They reported that the audio interface provided clear and crisp sound output, which was more than adequate for podcasting, streaming, and basic music production. Many users highlighted the low noise level and the effective preamps as key strengths in this category. 25% of users were dissatisfied with the sound quality, citing issues such as occasional noise interference and a lack of richness in the sound. Some users felt that the sound output was not professional-grade, which limited its use for more advanced recording projects. 75% Build Quality 70% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the M-Track Duo. They appreciated the compact and lightweight design, which made it easy to transport and integrate into various setups. Users found the interface sturdy enough for regular use, despite its affordability. 30% of users were dissatisfied with the build quality, mentioning that the plastic construction felt somewhat flimsy. Concerns were raised about the durability of the knobs and connectors, with some users experiencing breakages or malfunctions after limited use. 70% Ease of Use 85% of users praised the ease of use of the M-Track Duo. They found the interface straightforward to set up, with intuitive controls that allowed even beginners to get started quickly. The plug-and-play functionality with most operating systems was frequently highlighted as a positive aspect. 15% of users reported challenges with ease of use, primarily related to driver issues or software compatibility problems. Some users experienced difficulties in configuring the interface with their digital audio workstations, which led to frustration, especially among those less familiar with audio technology. 85% Portability 82% of users were satisfied with the portability of the M-Track Duo. They appreciated its compact size and light weight, which made it convenient to carry for on-the-go recording sessions and live performances. The USB-powered design was also a bonus for users who needed a mobile solution. 18% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the portability, noting that while the device was easy to transport, it required additional cables and accessories that complicated its use in mobile scenarios. Some users also mentioned that they would have preferred a more robust carrying case for protection during transport. 82% Connectivity Options 77% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options provided by the M-Track Duo. They appreciated the dual XLR/Line inputs and the flexibility to connect various instruments and microphones. The inclusion of a headphone output for real-time monitoring was also well-received. 23% of users were dissatisfied with the connectivity options, feeling that the interface lacked sufficient input/output ports for more complex recording setups. Some users also experienced connectivity issues, such as loose connections or difficulty in maintaining stable connections with external devices. 77% Driver Stability 68% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the M-Track Duo. Many users reported that once installed, the drivers performed reliably, allowing for smooth operation without frequent crashes or glitches. This stability was particularly appreciated by users who needed a dependable interface for live recordings. 32% of users were dissatisfied with driver stability, experiencing issues such as installation difficulties or incompatibility with certain operating systems. Some users reported frequent disconnections or the need to reinstall drivers to resolve functionality issues, which was a significant inconvenience. 68% Customer Support 74% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by M-Audio. They reported responsive and helpful support teams that assisted with technical issues and provided guidance on product use. Many users felt that the support team was knowledgeable and eager to solve problems efficiently. 26% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing long wait times and less helpful responses. Some users reported difficulty in reaching support representatives or receiving solutions that did not fully address their issues, leading to unresolved technical problems. 74% Software Compatibility 72% of users were satisfied with the software compatibility of the M-Track Duo. They found it to work well with a variety of digital audio workstations (DAWs), making it a versatile choice for users with different software preferences. The ease of integration was a frequently noted advantage. 28% of users were dissatisfied with software compatibility, encountering issues such as lack of support for certain DAWs or operating systems. Some users reported that the bundled software was not as comprehensive or user-friendly as expected, limiting the interface's utility for specific applications. 72% Latency Performance 73% of users were satisfied with the latency performance of the M-Track Duo. They noted minimal latency during recording and playback, making it suitable for real-time monitoring and live performance applications. The low latency was particularly beneficial for musicians and podcasters who required immediate audio feedback. 27% of users were dissatisfied with latency performance, experiencing noticeable delays that affected the timing of recordings and live sessions. Some users found the latency unacceptable for professional use, necessitating additional software or hardware solutions to mitigate the issue. 73% Aesthetics 80% of users appreciated the aesthetics of the M-Track Duo, complimenting its sleek and modern design. Users found the interface visually appealing, with a layout that was both stylish and functional, fitting well into various studio setups. 20% of users were less impressed with the aesthetics, feeling that the design was too basic or lacked distinctive features. Some users expressed a preference for more color options or a more premium appearance to align with their personal style or professional studio environments. 80% Durability 69% of users were satisfied with the durability of the M-Track Duo, noting that it withstood regular use without significant wear or damage. Users felt confident in the product's ability to handle routine transport and setup without compromising performance. 31% of users were dissatisfied with the durability, reporting issues such as broken knobs or damaged ports after limited use. Some users felt that the materials used in construction were not robust enough to withstand more rigorous use, raising concerns about the product's longevity. 69% Input Quality 74% of users were satisfied with the input quality of the M-Track Duo, finding the interface capable of capturing clear and accurate audio from various sources. The flexibility of the inputs was also appreciated, as it allowed users to connect different types of microphones and instruments with ease. 26% of users were dissatisfied with the input quality, encountering issues such as distortion or low input levels that affected recording quality. Some users noted that the preamps could have been more powerful to better support high-impedance or professional-grade microphones. 74% Output Quality 76% of users were pleased with the output quality of the M-Track Duo, highlighting the clarity and volume of the audio signals produced. Users found the output to be more than sufficient for most home recording and playback applications, providing a reliable listening experience. 24% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the output quality, noting issues such as uneven sound balance or insufficient volume levels. Some users felt that the output lacked depth or richness, which was particularly noticeable during critical listening or professional mixing tasks. 76% Channel Count 71% of users were satisfied with the channel count of the M-Track Duo, which they found adequate for basic recording needs. Users appreciated the simplicity of a dual-channel setup, which allowed for straightforward recording of vocals and instruments simultaneously. 29% of users were dissatisfied with the channel count, wishing for more inputs and outputs for complex recording sessions. Some users found the two-channel limitation restrictive, especially when trying to record multiple sources or implement more advanced studio setups. 71% Power Supply 79% of users were satisfied with the power supply of the M-Track Duo, appreciating the convenience of USB power, which eliminated the need for additional power adapters. This feature was particularly valued by users seeking a simple and portable recording solution. 21% of users were dissatisfied with the power supply, citing concerns about power stability when connected to certain USB ports or hubs. Some users experienced issues with power reliability, which led to interruptions during recording sessions. 79% Driver Installation 66% of users were satisfied with the driver installation process, finding it straightforward and easy to follow. Users appreciated the clear instructions provided, which facilitated a smooth setup experience, especially for those with limited technical expertise. 34% of users were dissatisfied with the driver installation, reporting difficulties such as compatibility issues or incomplete installations. Some users found the process frustrating, particularly when faced with errors that required technical support to resolve. 66% Latency Control 70% of users were satisfied with the latency control offered by the M-Track Duo, noting that the interface provided adequate control over latency settings to optimize recording and monitoring experiences. This feature was beneficial for users needing precise timing adjustments in their workflows. 30% of users were dissatisfied with latency control, feeling that the options provided were too limited or ineffective in completely eliminating latency issues. Some users experienced persistent latency that affected critical recording applications, leading to frustration and additional troubleshooting. 70% Software Bundles 73% of users were satisfied with the software bundles included with the M-Track Duo, finding them useful for getting started with recording and production. The inclusion of basic DAWs and plugins was appreciated, as it provided immediate tools for users to begin their projects. 27% of users were dissatisfied with the software bundles, feeling that the included software was either too basic or not comprehensive enough for their needs. Some users found the software limited in functionality, requiring additional purchases to achieve their desired setup. 73% User Manual 77% of users were satisfied with the user manual provided with the M-Track Duo, finding it clear and informative. Users appreciated the detailed explanations and troubleshooting tips, which helped them quickly understand and utilize the interface's features. 23% of users were dissatisfied with the user manual, stating that it lacked depth or clarity in certain sections. Some users found the manual insufficient for resolving specific technical issues, requiring them to seek additional support or resources. 77% Overall Satisfaction 76% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the M-Audio M-Track Duo, highlighting its affordability, ease of use, and adequate performance for basic audio recording tasks. Many users felt that the interface met their expectations, providing a reliable and accessible entry point into home recording. 24% of users expressed overall dissatisfaction, primarily due to limitations in features and performance that did not meet their specific needs. Some users expected more advanced capabilities or higher sound quality, leading to disappointment with the overall experience. 76% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the balance between affordability and functionality, making it an excellent choice for both beginners and professionals. Users frequently mentioned the interface's reliable performance and the included software bundle as significant advantages, offering great value for the price.

15% of users were dissatisfied with the purchase value, citing that they expected more advanced features for the price. Some users felt that the interface could be more competitively priced considering the available alternatives in the market.

85%
Quality of Materials

90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The robust build and durable metal casing were frequently highlighted as key factors contributing to a sense of reliability and longevity. Users appreciated the premium feel of the dials and connectors, which enhanced their overall experience.

10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of materials, noting that some components felt slightly less durable over time. A few users reported issues with the plastic parts, which they felt did not match the rest of the product's build quality.

90%
Ease of Use

88% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface easy to use. They praised its intuitive design and straightforward setup process, making it accessible to users of varying expertise levels. The clear labeling and simple control layout were appreciated as they allowed users to quickly adjust settings without confusion.

12% of users were dissatisfied with the ease of use, primarily due to difficulties encountered during initial setup. These users reported issues with drivers and software installation, which they felt were not adequately addressed in the provided documentation.

88%
Sound Quality

92% of users were impressed with the sound quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, noting its clear and crisp audio output as a standout feature. Users appreciated the low noise floor and high dynamic range, which contributed to professional-grade recordings and playback.

8% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, mentioning occasional latency issues and minor distortion at high volumes. Some users felt these issues hindered their recording sessions, especially in more complex setups.

92%
Compatibility

87% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing its seamless integration with various DAWs and operating systems as a major advantage. Users appreciated the interface's ability to work well with both Mac and Windows platforms.

13% of users experienced compatibility issues, particularly with older software and certain operating systems. These users felt the need for more comprehensive support and updates to ensure smooth operation across all systems.

87%
Portability

85% of users praised the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, highlighting its compact size and lightweight design. This made it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions or gigs, which was a significant plus for users frequently on the move.

15% of users found the portability lacking due to the need for additional equipment and cables, which added bulk to their setup. Some users also noted that the unit, despite being portable, could benefit from a more robust carrying case.

85%
Durability

88% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often commenting on its sturdy construction. Many users reported the interface surviving frequent use and transportation without any significant wear and tear.

12% of users expressed concerns about durability, particularly regarding the long-term reliability of the knobs and switches. Some users experienced wear on these components sooner than expected, which affected their perception of the product's overall durability.

88%
Aesthetics

90% of users were pleased with the aesthetics of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often mentioning its sleek and modern design. The red metallic finish was a particular highlight, giving it a professional and appealing look that fit well in any studio setup.

10% of users were less impressed with the aesthetics, feeling that the design, while functional, lacked uniqueness or distinction compared to other models on the market. Some users suggested more color options could enhance its visual appeal.

90%
Customer Support

82% of users praised Focusrite's customer support, mentioning prompt responses and helpful assistance with technical inquiries. Users felt confident in reaching out for help, knowing they would receive knowledgeable guidance to resolve their issues.

18% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses and unhelpful troubleshooting advice. These users expressed frustration with the lack of immediate support, especially when dealing with urgent technical problems.

82%
Latency

89% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found it capable of handling real-time monitoring and recording without noticeable delays, which was crucial for professional audio work.

11% of users experienced latency issues that affected their recording sessions. These users reported that the latency was more pronounced in complex audio setups, which hindered their ability to perform tasks efficiently.

89%
Driver Stability

83% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The majority of users reported consistent performance with minimal crashes or connectivity issues, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions.

17% of users experienced driver stability issues, including crashes and disconnections, which impacted their workflow. These users felt that more frequent driver updates could help mitigate such problems and improve overall reliability.

83%
Preamp Quality

91% of users were highly satisfied with the preamp quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted the clean and transparent sound the preamps provided, which allowed for accurate capture of vocals and instruments without coloration.

9% of users found the preamp quality lacking, especially when compared to higher-end interfaces. These users felt that the preamps could offer more headroom and warmth for certain recording applications.

91%
Software Bundle

86% of users appreciated the software bundle included with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the DAW and plugin offerings to be a valuable addition that enhanced their recording and production capabilities right out of the box.

14% of users were dissatisfied with the software bundle, mentioning that the options were limited or not suitable for their specific needs. Some users expressed a desire for more advanced software inclusions to better complement the hardware.

86%
Input/Output Options

84% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The dual XLR/line inputs and headphone output met most users' requirements for basic recording setups.

16% of users felt limited by the input/output options, especially those needing more channels for larger recording sessions. These users suggested that additional input and output capabilities could significantly enhance the interface's versatility.

84%
Phantom Power

87% of users appreciated the inclusion of phantom power on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, enabling them to use condenser microphones effectively. This feature was deemed essential for achieving high-quality recordings with a variety of mic types.

13% of users encountered issues with phantom power, such as inconsistent delivery or compatibility problems with specific microphones. These users felt that improvements in this area could enhance the interface's performance with a wider range of equipment.

87%
USB-C Connectivity

89% of users were pleased with the USB-C connectivity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Audio Interface, noting the faster data transfer and improved power efficiency. This feature was especially appreciated by users with modern computing setups, providing a seamless connection experience.

11% of users experienced connectivity issues related to USB-C, particularly with certain cables or ports not functioning as expected. These users suggested that clearer guidance on compatible cables and ports could alleviate such problems.

89%
Overall Satisfaction

88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing it as a reliable and high-performance tool for their audio needs. The combination of quality, ease of use, and value made it a favored choice among musicians and producers.

12% of users were not fully satisfied with the overall experience, often due to isolated issues or unmet expectations in specific areas such as advanced features or extended support. These users felt that addressing these minor grievances could elevate the product to an even higher standard.

88%
Recording Quality

91% of users were highly satisfied with the recording quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted its ability to capture detailed and accurate audio, making it suitable for various applications from podcasts to music production.

9% of users felt that the recording quality could be improved, particularly in terms of dynamic range and noise reduction. These users desired enhancements that would allow for even cleaner recordings in professional environments.

91%
Monitor Control

86% of users appreciated the monitor control features of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, particularly the direct monitor switch and volume control. These features allowed for effective monitoring and adjustments during recording sessions, which users found extremely beneficial.

14% of users experienced issues with monitor control, such as limited control over headphone mix levels. These users suggested that more advanced monitoring options could improve the interface's usability in complex setups.

86%
Updates and Support

80% of users were satisfied with the updates and support provided for the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the ongoing driver updates and support resources available, which helped maintain the interface's performance over time.

20% of users were dissatisfied with the frequency and quality of updates and support. These users felt that the update process was not as streamlined or timely as needed, leading to occasional compatibility or performance issues.

80%
Product Longevity

87% of users were satisfied with the product longevity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, reporting that it remained functional and reliable over extended periods of use. This aspect contributed to users' confidence in their investment.

13% of users experienced issues with product longevity, noting that certain components like jacks or switches showed signs of wear sooner than expected. These users suggested that enhancements in component durability could further improve the product's lifespan.

87%

Purchase Value

78% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface. Many users appreciated the affordable price point, stating that it offers excellent value for money given its features and functionality. Users found it to be a cost-effective solution for home recording and basic audio interface needs, making it an attractive option for beginners and hobbyists.

22% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, noting that despite its low cost, the device lacked some advanced features found in more expensive models. Some users felt that it did not meet their expectations for sound quality or build durability, leading them to question the long-term value of the investment.

78%
Sound Quality

75% of users were happy with the sound quality delivered by the M-Track Duo. They reported that the audio interface provided clear and crisp sound output, which was more than adequate for podcasting, streaming, and basic music production. Many users highlighted the low noise level and the effective preamps as key strengths in this category.

25% of users were dissatisfied with the sound quality, citing issues such as occasional noise interference and a lack of richness in the sound. Some users felt that the sound output was not professional-grade, which limited its use for more advanced recording projects.

75%
Build Quality

70% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the M-Track Duo. They appreciated the compact and lightweight design, which made it easy to transport and integrate into various setups. Users found the interface sturdy enough for regular use, despite its affordability.

30% of users were dissatisfied with the build quality, mentioning that the plastic construction felt somewhat flimsy. Concerns were raised about the durability of the knobs and connectors, with some users experiencing breakages or malfunctions after limited use.

70%
Ease of Use

85% of users praised the ease of use of the M-Track Duo. They found the interface straightforward to set up, with intuitive controls that allowed even beginners to get started quickly. The plug-and-play functionality with most operating systems was frequently highlighted as a positive aspect.

15% of users reported challenges with ease of use, primarily related to driver issues or software compatibility problems. Some users experienced difficulties in configuring the interface with their digital audio workstations, which led to frustration, especially among those less familiar with audio technology.

85%
Portability

82% of users were satisfied with the portability of the M-Track Duo. They appreciated its compact size and light weight, which made it convenient to carry for on-the-go recording sessions and live performances. The USB-powered design was also a bonus for users who needed a mobile solution.

18% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the portability, noting that while the device was easy to transport, it required additional cables and accessories that complicated its use in mobile scenarios. Some users also mentioned that they would have preferred a more robust carrying case for protection during transport.

82%
Connectivity Options

77% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options provided by the M-Track Duo. They appreciated the dual XLR/Line inputs and the flexibility to connect various instruments and microphones. The inclusion of a headphone output for real-time monitoring was also well-received.

23% of users were dissatisfied with the connectivity options, feeling that the interface lacked sufficient input/output ports for more complex recording setups. Some users also experienced connectivity issues, such as loose connections or difficulty in maintaining stable connections with external devices.

77%
Driver Stability

68% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the M-Track Duo. Many users reported that once installed, the drivers performed reliably, allowing for smooth operation without frequent crashes or glitches. This stability was particularly appreciated by users who needed a dependable interface for live recordings.

32% of users were dissatisfied with driver stability, experiencing issues such as installation difficulties or incompatibility with certain operating systems. Some users reported frequent disconnections or the need to reinstall drivers to resolve functionality issues, which was a significant inconvenience.

68%
Customer Support

74% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by M-Audio. They reported responsive and helpful support teams that assisted with technical issues and provided guidance on product use. Many users felt that the support team was knowledgeable and eager to solve problems efficiently.

26% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing long wait times and less helpful responses. Some users reported difficulty in reaching support representatives or receiving solutions that did not fully address their issues, leading to unresolved technical problems.

74%
Software Compatibility

72% of users were satisfied with the software compatibility of the M-Track Duo. They found it to work well with a variety of digital audio workstations (DAWs), making it a versatile choice for users with different software preferences. The ease of integration was a frequently noted advantage.

28% of users were dissatisfied with software compatibility, encountering issues such as lack of support for certain DAWs or operating systems. Some users reported that the bundled software was not as comprehensive or user-friendly as expected, limiting the interface's utility for specific applications.

72%
Latency Performance

73% of users were satisfied with the latency performance of the M-Track Duo. They noted minimal latency during recording and playback, making it suitable for real-time monitoring and live performance applications. The low latency was particularly beneficial for musicians and podcasters who required immediate audio feedback.

27% of users were dissatisfied with latency performance, experiencing noticeable delays that affected the timing of recordings and live sessions. Some users found the latency unacceptable for professional use, necessitating additional software or hardware solutions to mitigate the issue.

73%
Aesthetics

80% of users appreciated the aesthetics of the M-Track Duo, complimenting its sleek and modern design. Users found the interface visually appealing, with a layout that was both stylish and functional, fitting well into various studio setups.

20% of users were less impressed with the aesthetics, feeling that the design was too basic or lacked distinctive features. Some users expressed a preference for more color options or a more premium appearance to align with their personal style or professional studio environments.

80%
Durability

69% of users were satisfied with the durability of the M-Track Duo, noting that it withstood regular use without significant wear or damage. Users felt confident in the product's ability to handle routine transport and setup without compromising performance.

31% of users were dissatisfied with the durability, reporting issues such as broken knobs or damaged ports after limited use. Some users felt that the materials used in construction were not robust enough to withstand more rigorous use, raising concerns about the product's longevity.

69%
Input Quality

74% of users were satisfied with the input quality of the M-Track Duo, finding the interface capable of capturing clear and accurate audio from various sources. The flexibility of the inputs was also appreciated, as it allowed users to connect different types of microphones and instruments with ease.

26% of users were dissatisfied with the input quality, encountering issues such as distortion or low input levels that affected recording quality. Some users noted that the preamps could have been more powerful to better support high-impedance or professional-grade microphones.

74%
Output Quality

76% of users were pleased with the output quality of the M-Track Duo, highlighting the clarity and volume of the audio signals produced. Users found the output to be more than sufficient for most home recording and playback applications, providing a reliable listening experience.

24% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the output quality, noting issues such as uneven sound balance or insufficient volume levels. Some users felt that the output lacked depth or richness, which was particularly noticeable during critical listening or professional mixing tasks.

76%
Channel Count

71% of users were satisfied with the channel count of the M-Track Duo, which they found adequate for basic recording needs. Users appreciated the simplicity of a dual-channel setup, which allowed for straightforward recording of vocals and instruments simultaneously.

29% of users were dissatisfied with the channel count, wishing for more inputs and outputs for complex recording sessions. Some users found the two-channel limitation restrictive, especially when trying to record multiple sources or implement more advanced studio setups.

71%
Power Supply

79% of users were satisfied with the power supply of the M-Track Duo, appreciating the convenience of USB power, which eliminated the need for additional power adapters. This feature was particularly valued by users seeking a simple and portable recording solution.

21% of users were dissatisfied with the power supply, citing concerns about power stability when connected to certain USB ports or hubs. Some users experienced issues with power reliability, which led to interruptions during recording sessions.

79%
Driver Installation

66% of users were satisfied with the driver installation process, finding it straightforward and easy to follow. Users appreciated the clear instructions provided, which facilitated a smooth setup experience, especially for those with limited technical expertise.

34% of users were dissatisfied with the driver installation, reporting difficulties such as compatibility issues or incomplete installations. Some users found the process frustrating, particularly when faced with errors that required technical support to resolve.

66%
Latency Control

70% of users were satisfied with the latency control offered by the M-Track Duo, noting that the interface provided adequate control over latency settings to optimize recording and monitoring experiences. This feature was beneficial for users needing precise timing adjustments in their workflows.

30% of users were dissatisfied with latency control, feeling that the options provided were too limited or ineffective in completely eliminating latency issues. Some users experienced persistent latency that affected critical recording applications, leading to frustration and additional troubleshooting.

70%
Software Bundles

73% of users were satisfied with the software bundles included with the M-Track Duo, finding them useful for getting started with recording and production. The inclusion of basic DAWs and plugins was appreciated, as it provided immediate tools for users to begin their projects.

27% of users were dissatisfied with the software bundles, feeling that the included software was either too basic or not comprehensive enough for their needs. Some users found the software limited in functionality, requiring additional purchases to achieve their desired setup.

73%
User Manual

77% of users were satisfied with the user manual provided with the M-Track Duo, finding it clear and informative. Users appreciated the detailed explanations and troubleshooting tips, which helped them quickly understand and utilize the interface's features.

23% of users were dissatisfied with the user manual, stating that it lacked depth or clarity in certain sections. Some users found the manual insufficient for resolving specific technical issues, requiring them to seek additional support or resources.

77%
Overall Satisfaction

76% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the M-Audio M-Track Duo, highlighting its affordability, ease of use, and adequate performance for basic audio recording tasks. Many users felt that the interface met their expectations, providing a reliable and accessible entry point into home recording.

24% of users expressed overall dissatisfaction, primarily due to limitations in features and performance that did not meet their specific needs. Some users expected more advanced capabilities or higher sound quality, leading to disappointment with the overall experience.

76%

Pros:
High-quality preamps for clear audio capture. USB-C connectivity for faster data transfer and compatibility. Compact and portable design. Low latency monitoring. Easy setup and user-friendly interface.	Affordable price point. Compact and portable design. Easy to set up and use. Compatible with most DAWs. Offers phantom power for condenser microphones.

Cons:
Limited to two inputs, which may not be enough for some users. No MIDI input/output. Higher price point compared to some competitors. Requires external power when used with some devices.	Limited to two input channels. Plastic build may feel less durable. Basic preamps may not satisfy professional users. No MIDI input/output. Lacks advanced features found in higher-end models.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	48 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2	2 Preamps
Analog Audio I/O
2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)	2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-B (Class-Compliant)
OS Compatibility
macOS Windows	macOS 10.8 or Later Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit)
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)	USB Bus Power

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface share similar basic functionalities but differ significantly in several key specifications and features.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen) offers a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit resolution, which is notably higher than the M-Audio M-Track Duo's 48 kHz at 24-bit. This higher sampling rate in the Scarlett 2i2 allows for more detailed and accurate audio recordings, making it a preferred choice for professionals seeking high-fidelity recordings. Both interfaces provide 2 analog inputs and 2 analog outputs, but the Scarlett 2i2 utilizes USB-C for its host connection, ensuring faster data transfer speeds and better compatibility with modern devices, while the M-Audio M-Track Duo uses the older USB-B interface.
In terms of microphone inputs, both interfaces offer 2 preamps, but the Scarlett 2i2's inputs are XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Inputs and 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Inputs, providing versatile connectivity options. The M-Audio M-Track Duo also offers 2 Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs, which similarly accommodates various input types but with less clarity regarding the types of connections supported.
For analog audio I/O, the Scarlett 2i2 includes 2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Inputs, 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Inputs (Front Panel), 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Outputs, and 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel). On the other hand, the M-Audio M-Track Duo features 2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs (Front Panel), 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Outputs, and 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel). These configurations indicate that both devices are designed to handle similar input types, but the Scarlett 2i2 includes balanced monitor outputs for better sound quality in professional monitoring environments.
Regarding operating system compatibility, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 works with both macOS and Windows, whereas the M-Audio M-Track Duo specifies compatibility with macOS 10.8 or later and Windows 7 or later (32-/64-bit). Both interfaces are USB bus-powered, but the Scarlett 2i2 also offers the option to use a USB power adapter, providing additional power stability when needed.
In summary, while both interfaces offer essential features for audio recording, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) stands out with its higher sampling rate, faster USB-C connection, and balanced monitor outputs, making it a more advanced choice for professional audio recording. The M-Audio M-Track Duo, with its lower sampling rate and USB-B connection, is more suited for users looking for a more budget-friendly option with basic recording needs.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	48 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2	2 Preamps
Input Level Adjustment
2x Knob	2x Knob
Expansion Slots

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface both offer 2 channels of analog input and output with 2 microphone inputs, making them suitable for small recording setups. Both interfaces also provide 2x knobs for input level adjustment, allowing for precise control over the input signal levels. Neither device includes built-in DSP or expansion slots, focusing on a straightforward, no-frills approach to recording.
However, there are notable differences between these two interfaces. The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 boasts a higher maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz / 24-bit, which can capture more detailed audio compared to the M-Audio M-Track Duo's maximum sampling rate of 48 kHz / 24-bit. This makes the Scarlett 2i2 a better choice for those who require higher fidelity recordings. Additionally, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 utilizes a USB-C connection, offering potentially faster data transfer speeds and greater compatibility with modern devices, whereas the M-Audio M-Track Duo uses a USB-B connection, which is more common but generally slower.
In summary, while both interfaces offer similar basic features such as 2 inputs/outputs, microphone preamps, and input level adjustment knobs, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 stands out with its higher sampling rate and USB-C connectivity. This makes it more suitable for users seeking higher audio quality and modern connectivity options. The M-Audio M-Track Duo, on the other hand, offers a more basic and potentially more cost-effective solution, though with lower sampling capabilities and older USB-B connectivity.

Signal Processing
Gain/Trim Range
Mic/Line Inputs: Up to +69 dB Hi-Z Inputs: 62 dB	Mic Inputs: Up to +60 dB Line/Hi-Z Inputs: Up to +50 dB

When comparing the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface, several distinctions emerge based on their features.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers a substantial gain/trim range for its inputs. Specifically, it provides up to +69 dB for mic/line inputs and 62 dB for Hi-Z inputs. This extensive gain range makes it suitable for capturing a wide array of sound sources, from quiet vocals to loud instruments, with high fidelity.
On the other hand, the M-Audio M-Track Duo offers a more limited gain range. It provides up to +60 dB for mic inputs and up to +50 dB for line/Hi-Z inputs. While this range is sufficient for many recording scenarios, it is less versatile compared to the Scarlett 2i2, particularly for situations requiring higher gain.
Additionally, the M-Audio M-Track Duo lacks several features that may be important for some users. It does not include a pad feature, which is useful for attenuating strong signals to prevent clipping. Furthermore, it lacks a high-pass filter for reducing low-frequency noise and does not offer solo or mute functions, which can be critical for detailed mixing and monitoring.
In contrast, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 is designed with these considerations in mind, making it a more comprehensive solution for professional and home studio recording needs. Overall, the Scarlett 2i2's higher gain range and additional features make it a more versatile and robust audio interface compared to the M-Audio M-Track Duo.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)	2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Phantom Power
48 V, Selectable On/Off	48 V, Selectable On/Off (Applied to All Inputs)
Digital Audio I/O

Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-B (Class-Compliant)
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0	USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)
1x USB-C (Power Input)
Sync I/O

Network I/O

MIDI I/O

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface share some common features but also have distinct differences that cater to various user needs.
In terms of analog audio I/O, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers 2x XLR 3-pin balanced mic inputs and 2x 1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced line/Hi-Z inputs on the front panel, along with 2x 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs and 1x 1/4" TRS headphone output also on the front panel. On the other hand, the M-Audio M-Track Duo features 2x combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced mic/line/Hi-Z inputs on the front panel, 2x 1/4" TRS balanced line outputs, and 1x 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output on the front panel. Both interfaces provide a good range of input and output options, with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offering a dedicated XLR input.
Both interfaces provide 48V phantom power, selectable on and off, which is essential for using condenser microphones. However, while the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 allows for specific input selection, the M-Audio M-Track Duo applies phantom power to all inputs simultaneously.
Regarding digital audio I/O, neither interface offers digital audio connections. This means that users relying solely on analog I/O can use both interfaces without the need for additional digital connections.
For host connection, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 uses a USB-C connection with USB 2.0 protocol, whereas the M-Audio M-Track Duo utilizes a USB-B connection with a class-compliant USB 2.0 protocol. The USB-C connection of the Scarlett 2i2 may offer more modern compatibility with newer devices and potentially better data transfer speeds.
Neither interface includes additional USB (non-host), sync I/O, network I/O, MIDI I/O, or wireless capabilities, making them both straightforward and focused on core audio recording and playback functionalities.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 and the M-Audio M-Track Duo are both capable audio interfaces suitable for different types of users. The Scarlett 2i2 offers a slightly more modern connection type and dedicated XLR inputs, while the M-Track Duo provides combo inputs that can accommodate a wider range of connections. Both interfaces deliver essential features like phantom power and balanced/unbalanced I/O options, making them strong contenders in their respective categories.

Performance
Frequency Response
XLR Mic Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB 1/4" Line Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.05 dB 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.15 dB	Mic, Line, Hi-Z Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz +0.1 dB Monitor Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz +0.1 dB Headphone Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz +0.5 dB
Maximum Output Level
1/4" Line: +16 dBu	Line Outputs: +4 dBu
Headphone Output Power
1/4": 32 mW into 33 Ohms 22 mW into 300 Ohms	60 mW per Channel into 32 Ohms
Impedance
XLR Mic Inputs: 3 Kilohms 1/4" Line Inputs: 60 Kilohms 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohms 1/4" Line Outputs: 100 Ohms 1/4" Headphone Outputs: < 50 Ohm	Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohm (Unbalanced)
THD+N
XLR Mic Inputs: -100 dB (at 8 dB Gain) 1/4" Line Inputs: -100 dB (at 8 dB Gain) 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: -80 dB (at Minimum Gain) 1/4" Line Outputs: -109 dB 1/4" Headphone Outputs: -99 dB (at 33 Ohms) -108 dB (at 300 Ohms) Digital A/D Converters: -110 dB Digital D/A Converters: -115 dB	Mic Inputs: 0.003% (A-Weighted, Min Gain, at 0 dBu) Hi-Z Inputs: 0.005% (A-Weighted, Min Gain, at 0 dBu) Headphone Outputs: 0.02% (A-Weighted)
EIN
XLR Mic Inputs: -127 dBu A-Weighted	Mic Inputs: -128 dBu A-Weighted (Max Gain)

When comparing the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface, several differences in their specifications become apparent.
Frequency Response: The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz with very low deviation across different inputs: XLR Mic Inputs at ±0.06 dB, 1/4" Line Inputs at ±0.05 dB, and 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs at ±0.15 dB. Meanwhile, the M-Audio M-Track Duo provides a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz with a slightly higher deviation for Hi-Z Inputs at +0.1 dB and Headphone Outputs at +0.5 dB. Overall, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 has a slightly tighter tolerance in frequency response across its inputs.
Maximum Input and Output Levels: The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers a maximum input level of 16 dBu for XLR Mic, 22 dBu for 1/4" Line, and 12 dBu for 1/4" Hi-Z inputs. It provides a maximum output level of +16 dBu for 1/4" Line Outputs. On the other hand, the M-Audio M-Track Duo lists its maximum output level for Line Outputs at +4 dBu. This indicates that the Scarlett 2i2 can handle higher input levels and offers higher output levels, making it more suitable for professional use.
Headphone Output Power: The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 provides 32 mW into 33 Ohms and 22 mW into 300 Ohms for its headphone output, while the M-Audio M-Track Duo offers 60 mW per channel into 32 Ohms. The M-Track Duo provides higher power for headphones into 32 Ohms, which might offer a louder and potentially clearer headphone monitoring experience at lower impedances.
Impedance: The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 has an impedance of 3 Kilohms for XLR Mic Inputs, 60 Kilohms for 1/4" Line Inputs, 1 Megohm for 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs, 100 Ohms for 1/4" Line Outputs, and less than 50 Ohms for 1/4" Headphone Outputs. The M-Audio M-Track Duo specifies an impedance of 1 Megohm for Hi-Z Inputs. The lower impedance in the Scarlett 2i2's XLR Mic Inputs and other inputs may contribute to better noise performance and signal integrity, especially in professional settings.
Dynamic Range: Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 boasts a dynamic range of 116 dBA for XLR Mic Inputs, 115.2 dBA for 1/4" Line Inputs, 113 dBA for 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs, 120 dB for 1/4" Line Outputs, and up to 115 dB for 1/4" Headphone Outputs depending on impedance. The M-Audio M-Track Duo provides a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 109 dB for Mic Inputs and Monitor Outputs, and 100 dB for Headphone Outputs. The Scarlett 2i2 generally provides a higher dynamic range, indicating better audio fidelity and lower noise levels.
THD+N and THD: The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 lists THD+N values of -100 dB (XLR Mic and 1/4" Line Inputs), -80 dB (1/4" Hi-Z Inputs), -109 dB (1/4" Line Outputs), and -99 dB to -108 dB (Headphone Outputs). The M-Audio M-Track Duo lists THD+N values of 0.003% (Mic Inputs), 0.005% (Hi-Z Inputs), and 0.02% (Headphone Outputs). In terms of THD, the M-Track Duo specifies 0.002% for Line Inputs and Monitor Outputs. The Scarlett 2i2 generally shows lower THD+N values, indicating potentially cleaner signal processing.
EIN: Both interfaces have very low Equivalent Input Noise (EIN), with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 at -127 dBu A-Weighted and the M-Audio M-Track Duo at -128 dBu A-Weighted. These values are very close and indicate high-quality preamps with low noise levels.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) generally offers higher input and output levels, a wider dynamic range, and lower THD+N values, making it a more robust option for professional audio applications. The M-Audio M-Track Duo, while offering strong performance metrics, especially in headphone output power, may not match the Scarlett 2i2 in terms of overall audio fidelity and professional-grade features.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 / 176.4 / 192 kHz	48 kHz (AD/DA Conversion)
Bit Depths
24-Bit	24-Bit (AD/DA Conversion)
Sync Sources
Internal	Internal

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface offer distinct features that cater to different user needs and preferences.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) supports a wide range of sample rates, including 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, 176.4, and 192 kHz. This extensive selection allows for high-resolution audio recording and playback, which is ideal for professional and semi-professional audio production. The interface also supports a bit depth of 24-bit, ensuring high-quality audio with minimal noise and distortion. Additionally, the Scarlett 2i2 uses internal sync sources, which helps in maintaining the timing and accuracy of the audio signals within the interface.
On the other hand, the M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface offers a sample rate of 48 kHz for both analog-to-digital (AD) and digital-to-analog (DA) conversion. While it may not offer the high sample rates available on the Scarlett 2i2, 48 kHz is still sufficient for most standard audio recording tasks and is a common rate for many audio applications. The M-Track Duo also supports a 24-bit depth for AD/DA conversion, providing good audio quality. Furthermore, it features zero-latency direct monitoring, which allows users to hear their input signals in real-time without any noticeable delay, making it a valuable feature for live recording and monitoring. Similar to the Scarlett 2i2, the M-Track Duo uses internal sync sources to manage the timing of audio signals.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) stands out with its higher and more varied sample rates, which can be crucial for high-end audio projects. Conversely, the M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface, while limited to a 48 kHz sample rate, offers zero-latency direct monitoring, which is beneficial for real-time audio applications. Both interfaces support 24-bit depth and use internal sync sources to ensure accurate audio signal processing.

Audio Storage & Playback

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS Windows	macOS 10.8 or Later Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit)

When comparing the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface, notable differences and similarities emerge in terms of OS compatibility, mobile app compatibility, and hardware requirements.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface supports both macOS and Windows operating systems, ensuring broad compatibility with most modern computers. Additionally, it extends its functionality to mobile devices by being compatible with iPadOS, making it a versatile choice for users who might want to record on the go using their iPads. This mobile app compatibility feature enhances its appeal for musicians and podcasters needing a portable setup.
On the other hand, the M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface is also compatible with macOS and Windows, specifically supporting macOS 10.8 or later and Windows 7 or later, both in 32-bit and 64-bit versions. However, it does not support mobile app compatibility, limiting its use to more traditional computer-based recording setups. This could be a drawback for users looking for a more flexible interface that can work in a mobile environment.
In terms of hardware requirements, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 uses a USB-C connection, aligning with the latest connectivity standards, which can provide faster data transfer rates and better performance. It does not specify the need for additional hardware beyond the USB-C connection.
Contrastingly, the M-Audio M-Track Duo requires an available USB-A port and includes the necessary USB cable for connectivity. It also necessitates an internet connection for registration and software or driver downloads, which might be seen as an extra step for users who prefer a more straightforward setup process. This requirement could be inconvenient for those without ready internet access or who prefer not to go through additional setup steps.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) stands out with its USB-C connectivity and mobile app compatibility, catering to users who need both versatility and modern connectivity options. The M-Audio M-Track Duo, while offering broad OS compatibility and necessary hardware inclusions, lacks mobile app support and requires an internet connection for initial setup, making it a more traditional yet somewhat less flexible option in comparison.

Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)	USB Bus Power

When comparing the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface in terms of power requirements, there are notable differences that may influence a user's choice depending on their specific needs.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) offers multiple power options. It can be powered via USB bus power, which is convenient for mobile setups where a user might not have access to an external power source. Additionally, it supports a USB power adapter (not included) and an AC/DC power adapter that requires 5 VDC at 900 mA. This multi-option power capability ensures that users have flexibility in various recording environments, whether in a studio, on the go, or in locations where power sources may be unreliable. Its power consumption is rated at 4.5 W.
On the other hand, the M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface is simpler in its power requirements, relying solely on USB bus power. This means it draws power directly from the connected computer via the USB connection. While this makes the M-Track Duo a more straightforward and potentially more portable option, it might limit its use in scenarios where the computer's USB power might not be sufficient or when additional power stability is needed.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) offers more versatility with its multiple power options, which can be a significant advantage in diverse recording situations. Conversely, the M-Audio M-Track Duo's reliance solely on USB bus power makes it a simpler, potentially more portable solution but with less flexibility regarding power sources.

Physical
Dimensions
7.1 x 4.6 x 1.87" / 18 x 11.7 x 4.75 cm	7.5 x 4.4 x 2.1" / 19.1 x 11.2 x 5.3 cm
Weight
1.3 lb / 595.0 g	0.8 lb / 0.4 kg

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface present distinct physical specifications that may influence user choice based on size and weight considerations.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 measures 7.1 x 4.6 x 1.87 inches (18 x 11.7 x 4.75 cm) and weighs 1.3 lb (595.0 g). This compact size and moderate weight make it a sturdy option for both studio and mobile use. The build quality and ergonomic design ensure that it fits comfortably on a desktop while providing a solid, durable feel.
In contrast, the M-Audio M-Track Duo measures slightly larger at 7.5 x 4.4 x 2.1 inches (19.1 x 11.2 x 5.3 cm) but is lighter, weighing only 0.8 lb (0.4 kg). This lighter weight makes the M-Track Duo more portable, which is beneficial for users who need to transport their interface frequently. Despite its larger dimensions, it remains a conveniently sized option for various audio recording environments.
Overall, the choice between these two interfaces may depend on the user's preference for weight and size. The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers a more robust and slightly heavier build, while the M-Audio M-Track Duo provides a lighter and marginally larger alternative, catering to different needs and portability requirements.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
1.9 lb	1.32 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
8.2 x 7 x 2.6"	9 x 6.1 x 3.7"

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface differ in both weight and dimensions, which may influence user preferences depending on their specific needs for portability and space management.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) has a package weight of 1.9 lb, making it slightly heavier than the M-Audio M-Track Duo, which weighs 1.32 lb. This difference in weight, although not substantial, could be a deciding factor for users who prioritize lighter equipment, especially for mobile recording setups.
In terms of box dimensions, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 measures 8.2 x 7 x 2.6 inches (LxWxH), while the M-Audio M-Track Duo measures 9 x 6.1 x 3.7 inches. The Focusrite unit is more compact in length and height but is wider compared to the M-Audio interface. The smaller footprint in terms of length and height might make the Scarlett 2i2 more convenient for desktop setups with limited space, whereas the M-Audio M-Track Duo's slightly larger dimensions might offer a different layout or potentially more room for interface controls and connectivity options.
Both interfaces present unique advantages in terms of form factor, with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offering a more compact and slightly heavier design, and the M-Audio M-Track Duo providing a lighter but slightly larger alternative.