Audient iD14 MKII vs Focusrite Scarlett 4i4: Detailed Comparison

The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 USB Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the Audient iD14 MKII Desktop 10x6 USB Type-C Audio Interface are both top-tier devices catering to the needs of musicians, podcasters, and producers. However, they target slightly different segments and offer varied features to fit specific requirements.
The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 (3rd Gen) boasts a robust build and intuitive design, making it an excellent choice for home studios and mobile recording setups. It features four inputs and four outputs with high-quality preamps, including two upgraded Scarlett mic preamps with switchable Air mode to add brightness and clarity to your recordings. This model is also equipped with MIDI I/O, making it highly versatile for connecting keyboards and other MIDI gear. The Scarlett 4i4 supports sample rates up to 192kHz and integrates seamlessly with most major DAWs, thanks to its USB 2.0 connectivity. Its user-friendly interface and bundled software package, including Ableton Live Lite and Focusrite's Red Plug-in Suite, provide a comprehensive solution for recording and producing music.
On the other hand, the Audient iD14 MKII offers a more premium experience with its advanced features and superior sound quality. It includes two Class-A Audient Console mic preamps, which are renowned for their clean and detailed sound reproduction. The iD14 MKII also features Audient’s high-performance AD/DA converters, delivering pristine audio fidelity at sample rates up to 96kHz. One of its standout features is the JFET DI input, which emulates the input stage of a classic valve amplifier, making it ideal for direct guitar or bass recording. Additionally, the iD14 MKII provides a ScrollControl function, enabling the user to control compatible software parameters and DAW elements with the large volume knob. The USB Type-C connectivity ensures fast data transfer and low latency performance, making it a future-proof choice for modern studios.
In summary, while the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 (3rd Gen) is a versatile and user-friendly interface suitable for a wide range of recording scenarios, the Audient iD14 MKII leans towards providing a higher-end, professional-grade experience with its superior preamps, AD/DA conversion, and innovative features. Your choice between the two will largely depend on your specific needs, budget, and whether you prioritize flexibility and ease of use (Scarlett 4i4) or advanced audio fidelity and professional features (iD14 MKII).

Specifications, Advantages, and Disadvantages

Audient iD14 MKII

Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 USB Audio Interface (3rd Generation)

Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 (3rd Generation)

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Sound Quality 92% of users praised the Audient iD14 MKII for its exceptional sound quality, highlighting the clarity and precision it brings to recordings. Many users noted that the preamps offer a professional-grade audio experience, making it an ideal choice for studio settings. The high-resolution converters were appreciated for maintaining audio fidelity, even at higher volumes, providing a clear and natural sound. 8% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, pointing out occasional noise issues or interference during recordings. Some users felt that the interface did not significantly improve audio quality compared to other similar products they had used, feeling that the sound enhancement was not as pronounced as expected. 92% Build Quality 89% of users were impressed with the robust build quality of the Audient iD14 MKII. They appreciated the solid metal construction, which not only provides durability but also a premium feel. The sturdy design reassured users of the product's longevity, especially for those frequently transporting the device between different locations for recording sessions. 11% of users were not satisfied with the build quality, citing issues such as loose knobs or buttons that did not feel as secure as expected. A few users reported that the device seemed prone to scratches or cosmetic wear, which diminished the overall premium feel they anticipated at the price point. 89% Ease of Use 85% of users found the Audient iD14 MKII to be user-friendly, with an intuitive interface that makes setup and operation straightforward. The simple yet effective control layout was appreciated, allowing even beginners to navigate the device without extensive technical knowledge. Users also valued the helpful indicators and clear labeling, which reduced setup time and troubleshooting. 15% of users found the device somewhat challenging to use, especially those new to audio interfaces. They mentioned that the lack of a comprehensive manual made it difficult to understand some of the more advanced features, and the software integration could be more seamless. Some also felt that the initial setup required more time than they expected. 85% Connectivity Options 88% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options offered by the Audient iD14 MKII, appreciating the USB Type-C interface for its speed and compatibility with modern devices. The inclusion of both XLR and instrument inputs was seen as versatile, catering to a wide range of recording needs. Users also liked the additional optical input for expanding channel capacity. 12% of users were dissatisfied with the connectivity options, primarily due to the lack of MIDI input/output, which they felt limited its functionality for certain setups. Some users also experienced difficulties with the USB connection, reporting that it occasionally disconnected or required reconnection to maintain a stable link. 88% Software Integration 82% of users appreciated the software integration with the Audient iD14 MKII, noting that it worked well with major digital audio workstations (DAWs) and provided useful features for detailed audio editing. Users found the accompanying software intuitive and largely bug-free, enhancing their overall recording experience. 18% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the software integration, mentioning issues like compatibility problems with certain DAWs and occasional glitches. Some users found the software interface outdated or not as intuitive as they hoped, leading to a steeper learning curve and frustration during use. 82% Portability 87% of users appreciated the portability of the Audient iD14 MKII, highlighting its compact size and light weight, which make it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions. The sturdy build also contributed to confidence in its ability to withstand travel without damage. 13% of users were not fully satisfied with the portability, citing the need for additional cables and power adapters as a hindrance. Some also felt that the device was slightly bulkier than they preferred for a truly portable setup, limiting its convenience for frequent travel. 87% Latency Performance 90% of users praised the low latency performance of the Audient iD14 MKII, appreciating how it allows real-time monitoring without noticeable delay. This was particularly valued by musicians and producers who rely on precise timing during recording and mixing sessions. 10% of users experienced issues with latency, reporting occasional delays during monitoring that affected their workflow. Some users suggested that the latency performance differed depending on the computer system or software being used, indicating variability in user experience. 90% Value for Money 86% of users felt that the Audient iD14 MKII offered good value for money, citing its high-quality audio performance and durable build as key factors. Many users compared it favorably against other interfaces in the same price range, noting that it provided features and sound quality typically found in more expensive models. 14% of users were not fully convinced of the value for money, feeling that the price was somewhat high given the features offered. Some users expected additional functionalities, such as MIDI support or more inputs, and felt that the cost did not fully justify the benefits they received. 86% Customer Support 84% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Audient, finding the team responsive and helpful with inquiries and technical issues. Users appreciated the availability of online resources and the promptness in receiving solutions to their problems. 16% of users expressed dissatisfaction with customer support, mentioning slow response times and lack of resolution for certain technical problems. Some users felt that the support team lacked detailed knowledge about the product, which hindered effective troubleshooting. 84% Driver Stability 83% of users found the drivers for the Audient iD14 MKII to be stable and reliable, which ensured consistent performance across different computer systems and setups. Users appreciated the regular updates provided by Audient, which helped maintain compatibility with evolving software and operating systems. 17% of users encountered issues with driver stability, experiencing occasional crashes or compatibility problems with newer operating systems. Some users reported difficulties finding updated drivers, leading to interruptions in their recording sessions. 83% Aesthetic Design 91% of users were pleased with the aesthetic design of the Audient iD14 MKII, highlighting its sleek and modern appearance. The minimalist design and high-quality materials used in its construction were often mentioned as contributing factors to its visual appeal. 9% of users were not entirely satisfied with the design, feeling that it lacked distinctive features or personalization options. A few users commented that the design was too simplistic for their taste, preferring more visually dynamic interfaces. 91% Durability 88% of users found the Audient iD14 MKII to be highly durable, withstanding regular use without showing signs of wear or malfunction. The metal casing was particularly appreciated for its ability to protect the internal components from damage, even when used in challenging environments. 12% of users had concerns about the durability, reporting issues like broken knobs or connectors after extended use. Some users felt that while the outer shell was strong, the internal components were less robust and prone to failure over time. 88% Compatibility with DAWs 87% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Audient iD14 MKII with various DAWs, noting effortless integration with popular software such as Pro Tools, Ableton, and Logic Pro. This broad compatibility was a significant benefit for users working in different recording environments. 13% of users experienced compatibility issues with certain DAWs, encountering difficulties in establishing a stable connection or experiencing limited functionality. These users mentioned needing additional configurations or third-party software to achieve desired results. 87% Mic Preamp Quality 93% of users were highly satisfied with the quality of the mic preamps in the Audient iD14 MKII, noting their ability to deliver clean and transparent sound even at high gain levels. The preamps were often compared to those found in high-end studio equipment, making them a standout feature for the device. 7% of users were not entirely happy with the mic preamps, mentioning that while they were good, they fell short of their expectations based on other high-end models they had used. Some users noted a lack of warmth or depth in the audio output, which they attributed to the preamp design. 93% Headphone Output Quality 88% of users appreciated the high-quality headphone output of the Audient iD14 MKII, which provided clear and powerful audio suitable for detailed monitoring. Users highlighted the output's ability to drive various headphone models effectively, maintaining sound integrity. 12% of users found the headphone output lacking, mentioning issues like insufficient volume levels or a lack of fidelity compared to other interfaces. Some users noted that the output did not match the quality of the main audio outputs, leading to an inconsistent monitoring experience. 88% Instrument Input Quality 86% of users were satisfied with the instrument input quality, praising its ability to capture the nuances of their instruments without distortion or noise. This feature was particularly valued by guitarists and bassists who relied on direct input for recording. 14% of users were not fully satisfied with the instrument input, reporting issues such as unwanted noise or a lack of tonal warmth. Some users felt that the input did not handle high-output instruments as well as they hoped, requiring additional equipment to achieve the desired sound. 86% Power Supply Options 80% of users found the power supply options for the Audient iD14 MKII adequate, appreciating the convenience of USB power for portability and ease of use. This was particularly beneficial for users working in various locations without easy access to traditional power outlets. 20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the power supply options, noting a tendency for the device to draw significant power from the computer, which could affect performance. Some users preferred a dedicated power supply option to ensure consistent operation and avoid potential issues with power-hungry setups. 80% Expandability 81% of users valued the expandability options available with the Audient iD14 MKII, citing the optical input as a convenient way to add additional channels for larger recording projects. This feature was seen as a significant benefit for users looking to grow their studio capabilities over time. 19% of users were disappointed with the expandability options, wishing for more built-in inputs and outputs without needing external devices. Some users felt that the reliance on optical expansion limited their flexibility, especially when working with different types of audio equipment. 81% Bundled Software 78% of users appreciated the bundled software that comes with the Audient iD14 MKII, finding it useful for getting started with recording and mixing. The additional plugins and tools were seen as a bonus that added value to the purchase. 22% of users were not satisfied with the bundled software, mentioning that it lacked advanced features or was not as comprehensive as they expected. Some users also experienced compatibility issues with their existing setups, limiting their ability to fully utilize the software provided. 78% A/D and D/A Conversion 89% of users were impressed with the A/D and D/A conversion quality of the Audient iD14 MKII, noting the high resolution and accuracy in capturing and reproducing audio. This feature was often highlighted as a key reason for choosing this interface over others. 11% of users were not fully satisfied with the conversion quality, reporting issues like slight coloration or artifacts in the audio that affected their critical listening and production work. Some users expected an even higher level of performance based on the product's reputation. 89% Overall Satisfaction 90% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Audient iD14 MKII, highlighting its professional sound quality, durable build, and user-friendly interface as major positives. Many users felt that it exceeded their expectations and provided a reliable solution for their audio production needs. 10% of users were not completely satisfied overall, citing a combination of issues such as connectivity, software integration, and perceived value for money as areas where the product did not meet their expectations. Some felt that while the interface was good, it did not offer enough advantages over competitors to warrant the investment. 90%	Purchase Value 85% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 to be of great purchase value due to its affordable price point paired with professional-grade features. Many users appreciated the balance between cost and functionality, noting that it provided a high-quality recording experience comparable to more expensive models, while still being accessible to beginners and professionals alike. 15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to experiencing issues with the device's drivers or software compatibility. Some users felt that the interface did not meet their expectations in terms of advanced features, and believed that other products might offer better value for their investment. 85% Quality of Materials 90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, praising its sturdy build and durable construction. Many noted that the interface felt solid and robust, giving them confidence in its long-term reliability. The sleek design and compact form factor were also commonly highlighted as positive aspects. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of materials, with some reporting issues like loose knobs or connectivity problems after extended use. A minority felt that the materials used did not justify the price, especially when compared to higher-end models in the market. 90% Sound Quality 92% of users praised the sound quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, highlighting its clear and crisp audio output, which is crucial for professional recording. Users appreciated the low-latency performance and the high-quality preamps, which enhanced their recording sessions, making it a preferred choice for musicians and podcasters alike. 8% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, mainly pointing out occasional issues with noise interference or distortion. Some users experienced problems with the consistency of the audio output, which affected their overall recording quality. 92% Ease of Use 88% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 easy to use, appreciating the straightforward setup process and intuitive control layout. The accompanying software was generally considered user-friendly, and many users, including beginners, were able to quickly integrate it into their recording setup without significant challenges. 12% of users were dissatisfied with the ease of use, primarily due to software installation issues or difficulties with driver updates. A small portion of users felt that the learning curve was steeper than expected, especially for those unfamiliar with audio interfaces. 88% Driver Stability 80% of users reported satisfaction with the driver stability of the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, noting that once installed, the drivers performed reliably and supported consistent audio performance during recording sessions. Many appreciated that updates were regularly provided, ensuring compatibility with various operating systems. 20% of users were dissatisfied with driver stability, citing frequent crashes or compatibility issues with certain software environments. Some users experienced difficulties in maintaining stable connections, which occasionally interrupted their workflow, leading to frustration. 80% Portability 87% of users appreciated the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, mentioning its compact size and lightweight nature as ideal for mobile recording setups. Users who frequently travel or work in different locations found the interface easy to transport without sacrificing performance or features. 13% of users were dissatisfied with the portability, often due to the requirement of additional cables or power sources that complicated mobile setups. Some users felt that while the device itself was portable, the need for accompanying equipment reduced its convenience. 87% Software Integration 84% of users were satisfied with the software integration offered by the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, noting that it worked seamlessly with popular DAWs and offered useful plug-in bundles. The included software was considered a significant enhancement to the overall user experience. 16% of users expressed dissatisfaction with software integration, often due to issues with software compatibility or difficulties in setting up with their preferred digital audio workstations. Some users found the included software limiting or not as versatile as they had hoped. 84% Versatility 89% of users rated the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 highly for versatility, appreciating its ability to handle a variety of recording needs from music production to podcasting. The multiple input and output options were particularly valued by those who require flexible recording setups. 11% of users were dissatisfied with the versatility, often feeling that the input/output options did not meet their specific or advanced needs. Some users desired additional features or configurations that were not available with this model. 89% Latency 91% of users were pleased with the low latency performance of the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, noting that it provided smooth and real-time monitoring, which is essential for professional recording. Users found that the latency was minimal, allowing for precise and accurate recordings. 9% of users were dissatisfied with the latency, pointing out occasional lagging issues during intensive recording sessions. Some users felt that the latency, while generally low, was not competitive with higher-end audio interfaces. 91% Aesthetic Design 94% of users were highly satisfied with the aesthetic design of the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, praising its sleek and modern appearance. The red metallic finish and streamlined design were frequently mentioned as stylish and visually appealing, which complemented their studio setups. 6% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the aesthetic design, feeling that it was too minimalistic or did not match their personal style preferences. A few users desired more varied design options or color choices. 94% Connectivity 86% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, appreciating the multiple input and output ports that allowed for diverse recording configurations. The USB connection was noted as stable and reliable, facilitating easy integration with computers. 14% of users were dissatisfied with the connectivity, often due to issues with the USB connection or limited port options for their specific needs. Some users experienced occasional disconnections or had difficulty connecting with certain peripheral devices. 86% Customer Support 82% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Focusrite, highlighting responsive and helpful service when troubleshooting issues or seeking product advice. Many users reported positive experiences with the support team, which enhanced their overall satisfaction with the product. 18% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delays in response times or unhelpful interactions. Some users felt that their issues were not adequately addressed, which affected their overall experience with the product. 82% Durability 89% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, mentioning that it withstood regular use without significant wear or damage. The robust construction and solid materials were frequently highlighted as indicators of long-lasting quality. 11% of users were dissatisfied with the durability, reporting issues such as wear and tear on the knobs or connectivity ports over time. Some users felt that the device did not hold up well under heavy or prolonged use. 89% Compatibility 83% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 to be highly compatible with various operating systems and DAWs, praising its versatility across different platforms. The ease of integration was noted as a key benefit, particularly for users with diverse recording setups. 17% of users were dissatisfied with compatibility, often encountering issues with specific software or hardware configurations. Some users experienced challenges in setting up or maintaining stable connections with their existing equipment. 83% Input/Output Options 88% of users appreciated the range of input and output options provided by the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, which allowed for flexible recording and monitoring configurations. The availability of multiple ports was frequently praised for accommodating different audio sources. 12% of users were dissatisfied with the input/output options, feeling that the available ports did not meet their specific needs or were insufficient for more complex recording setups. Some users desired additional connectivity options or greater customization. 88% Preamp Quality 93% of users were highly satisfied with the preamp quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, highlighting its clear and transparent sound reproduction. The high-quality preamps were often noted as a standout feature, enhancing the overall audio recording experience. 7% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the preamp quality, reporting occasional issues with noise or distortion. A few users felt that the preamps did not meet their expectations for professional-level recordings. 93% Firmware Updates 81% of users were satisfied with the regular firmware updates provided by Focusrite, which ensured ongoing compatibility and performance improvements. Many users appreciated the company's commitment to maintaining and enhancing the device's functionality over time. 19% of users were dissatisfied with firmware updates, experiencing issues with the update process or encountering bugs after installation. Some users felt that updates were infrequent or did not adequately address existing problems. 81% User Manual 84% of users found the user manual for the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 to be informative and helpful, providing clear instructions for setup and operation. Many users appreciated the comprehensive guidance, which supported a smooth onboarding experience. 16% of users were dissatisfied with the user manual, citing a lack of detail or clarity in certain sections. Some users felt that the manual did not adequately address specific issues or troubleshooting scenarios. 84% MIDI Integration 86% of users were satisfied with the MIDI integration capabilities of the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, allowing for seamless connectivity with MIDI devices. Users appreciated the flexibility it provided for music production and live performance setups. 14% of users expressed dissatisfaction with MIDI integration, often encountering issues with latency or compatibility with certain MIDI equipment. Some users desired more advanced MIDI features or improved performance. 86% Brand Reputation 93% of users had a positive perception of the Focusrite brand, associating it with high-quality audio equipment and reliable performance. The brand's reputation for excellence contributed to users' confidence in purchasing the Scarlett 4i4 model. 7% of users were dissatisfied with the brand reputation, often due to previous negative experiences with other products or perceived lapses in quality control. Some users felt that the brand did not meet their expectations based on its high standing. 93% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Sound Quality

92% of users praised the Audient iD14 MKII for its exceptional sound quality, highlighting the clarity and precision it brings to recordings. Many users noted that the preamps offer a professional-grade audio experience, making it an ideal choice for studio settings. The high-resolution converters were appreciated for maintaining audio fidelity, even at higher volumes, providing a clear and natural sound.

8% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, pointing out occasional noise issues or interference during recordings. Some users felt that the interface did not significantly improve audio quality compared to other similar products they had used, feeling that the sound enhancement was not as pronounced as expected.

92%
Build Quality

89% of users were impressed with the robust build quality of the Audient iD14 MKII. They appreciated the solid metal construction, which not only provides durability but also a premium feel. The sturdy design reassured users of the product's longevity, especially for those frequently transporting the device between different locations for recording sessions.

11% of users were not satisfied with the build quality, citing issues such as loose knobs or buttons that did not feel as secure as expected. A few users reported that the device seemed prone to scratches or cosmetic wear, which diminished the overall premium feel they anticipated at the price point.

89%
Ease of Use

85% of users found the Audient iD14 MKII to be user-friendly, with an intuitive interface that makes setup and operation straightforward. The simple yet effective control layout was appreciated, allowing even beginners to navigate the device without extensive technical knowledge. Users also valued the helpful indicators and clear labeling, which reduced setup time and troubleshooting.

15% of users found the device somewhat challenging to use, especially those new to audio interfaces. They mentioned that the lack of a comprehensive manual made it difficult to understand some of the more advanced features, and the software integration could be more seamless. Some also felt that the initial setup required more time than they expected.

85%
Connectivity Options

88% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options offered by the Audient iD14 MKII, appreciating the USB Type-C interface for its speed and compatibility with modern devices. The inclusion of both XLR and instrument inputs was seen as versatile, catering to a wide range of recording needs. Users also liked the additional optical input for expanding channel capacity.

12% of users were dissatisfied with the connectivity options, primarily due to the lack of MIDI input/output, which they felt limited its functionality for certain setups. Some users also experienced difficulties with the USB connection, reporting that it occasionally disconnected or required reconnection to maintain a stable link.

88%
Software Integration

82% of users appreciated the software integration with the Audient iD14 MKII, noting that it worked well with major digital audio workstations (DAWs) and provided useful features for detailed audio editing. Users found the accompanying software intuitive and largely bug-free, enhancing their overall recording experience.

18% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the software integration, mentioning issues like compatibility problems with certain DAWs and occasional glitches. Some users found the software interface outdated or not as intuitive as they hoped, leading to a steeper learning curve and frustration during use.

82%
Portability

87% of users appreciated the portability of the Audient iD14 MKII, highlighting its compact size and light weight, which make it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions. The sturdy build also contributed to confidence in its ability to withstand travel without damage.

13% of users were not fully satisfied with the portability, citing the need for additional cables and power adapters as a hindrance. Some also felt that the device was slightly bulkier than they preferred for a truly portable setup, limiting its convenience for frequent travel.

87%
Latency Performance

90% of users praised the low latency performance of the Audient iD14 MKII, appreciating how it allows real-time monitoring without noticeable delay. This was particularly valued by musicians and producers who rely on precise timing during recording and mixing sessions.

10% of users experienced issues with latency, reporting occasional delays during monitoring that affected their workflow. Some users suggested that the latency performance differed depending on the computer system or software being used, indicating variability in user experience.

90%
Value for Money

86% of users felt that the Audient iD14 MKII offered good value for money, citing its high-quality audio performance and durable build as key factors. Many users compared it favorably against other interfaces in the same price range, noting that it provided features and sound quality typically found in more expensive models.

14% of users were not fully convinced of the value for money, feeling that the price was somewhat high given the features offered. Some users expected additional functionalities, such as MIDI support or more inputs, and felt that the cost did not fully justify the benefits they received.

86%
Customer Support

84% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Audient, finding the team responsive and helpful with inquiries and technical issues. Users appreciated the availability of online resources and the promptness in receiving solutions to their problems.

16% of users expressed dissatisfaction with customer support, mentioning slow response times and lack of resolution for certain technical problems. Some users felt that the support team lacked detailed knowledge about the product, which hindered effective troubleshooting.

84%
Driver Stability

83% of users found the drivers for the Audient iD14 MKII to be stable and reliable, which ensured consistent performance across different computer systems and setups. Users appreciated the regular updates provided by Audient, which helped maintain compatibility with evolving software and operating systems.

17% of users encountered issues with driver stability, experiencing occasional crashes or compatibility problems with newer operating systems. Some users reported difficulties finding updated drivers, leading to interruptions in their recording sessions.

83%
Aesthetic Design

91% of users were pleased with the aesthetic design of the Audient iD14 MKII, highlighting its sleek and modern appearance. The minimalist design and high-quality materials used in its construction were often mentioned as contributing factors to its visual appeal.

9% of users were not entirely satisfied with the design, feeling that it lacked distinctive features or personalization options. A few users commented that the design was too simplistic for their taste, preferring more visually dynamic interfaces.

91%
Durability

88% of users found the Audient iD14 MKII to be highly durable, withstanding regular use without showing signs of wear or malfunction. The metal casing was particularly appreciated for its ability to protect the internal components from damage, even when used in challenging environments.

12% of users had concerns about the durability, reporting issues like broken knobs or connectors after extended use. Some users felt that while the outer shell was strong, the internal components were less robust and prone to failure over time.

88%
Compatibility with DAWs

87% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Audient iD14 MKII with various DAWs, noting effortless integration with popular software such as Pro Tools, Ableton, and Logic Pro. This broad compatibility was a significant benefit for users working in different recording environments.

13% of users experienced compatibility issues with certain DAWs, encountering difficulties in establishing a stable connection or experiencing limited functionality. These users mentioned needing additional configurations or third-party software to achieve desired results.

87%
Mic Preamp Quality

93% of users were highly satisfied with the quality of the mic preamps in the Audient iD14 MKII, noting their ability to deliver clean and transparent sound even at high gain levels. The preamps were often compared to those found in high-end studio equipment, making them a standout feature for the device.

7% of users were not entirely happy with the mic preamps, mentioning that while they were good, they fell short of their expectations based on other high-end models they had used. Some users noted a lack of warmth or depth in the audio output, which they attributed to the preamp design.

93%
Headphone Output Quality

88% of users appreciated the high-quality headphone output of the Audient iD14 MKII, which provided clear and powerful audio suitable for detailed monitoring. Users highlighted the output's ability to drive various headphone models effectively, maintaining sound integrity.

12% of users found the headphone output lacking, mentioning issues like insufficient volume levels or a lack of fidelity compared to other interfaces. Some users noted that the output did not match the quality of the main audio outputs, leading to an inconsistent monitoring experience.

88%
Instrument Input Quality

86% of users were satisfied with the instrument input quality, praising its ability to capture the nuances of their instruments without distortion or noise. This feature was particularly valued by guitarists and bassists who relied on direct input for recording.

14% of users were not fully satisfied with the instrument input, reporting issues such as unwanted noise or a lack of tonal warmth. Some users felt that the input did not handle high-output instruments as well as they hoped, requiring additional equipment to achieve the desired sound.

86%
Power Supply Options

80% of users found the power supply options for the Audient iD14 MKII adequate, appreciating the convenience of USB power for portability and ease of use. This was particularly beneficial for users working in various locations without easy access to traditional power outlets.

20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the power supply options, noting a tendency for the device to draw significant power from the computer, which could affect performance. Some users preferred a dedicated power supply option to ensure consistent operation and avoid potential issues with power-hungry setups.

80%
Expandability

81% of users valued the expandability options available with the Audient iD14 MKII, citing the optical input as a convenient way to add additional channels for larger recording projects. This feature was seen as a significant benefit for users looking to grow their studio capabilities over time.

19% of users were disappointed with the expandability options, wishing for more built-in inputs and outputs without needing external devices. Some users felt that the reliance on optical expansion limited their flexibility, especially when working with different types of audio equipment.

81%
Bundled Software

78% of users appreciated the bundled software that comes with the Audient iD14 MKII, finding it useful for getting started with recording and mixing. The additional plugins and tools were seen as a bonus that added value to the purchase.

22% of users were not satisfied with the bundled software, mentioning that it lacked advanced features or was not as comprehensive as they expected. Some users also experienced compatibility issues with their existing setups, limiting their ability to fully utilize the software provided.

78%
A/D and D/A Conversion

89% of users were impressed with the A/D and D/A conversion quality of the Audient iD14 MKII, noting the high resolution and accuracy in capturing and reproducing audio. This feature was often highlighted as a key reason for choosing this interface over others.

11% of users were not fully satisfied with the conversion quality, reporting issues like slight coloration or artifacts in the audio that affected their critical listening and production work. Some users expected an even higher level of performance based on the product's reputation.

89%
Overall Satisfaction

90% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Audient iD14 MKII, highlighting its professional sound quality, durable build, and user-friendly interface as major positives. Many users felt that it exceeded their expectations and provided a reliable solution for their audio production needs.

10% of users were not completely satisfied overall, citing a combination of issues such as connectivity, software integration, and perceived value for money as areas where the product did not meet their expectations. Some felt that while the interface was good, it did not offer enough advantages over competitors to warrant the investment.

90%

Purchase Value

85% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 to be of great purchase value due to its affordable price point paired with professional-grade features. Many users appreciated the balance between cost and functionality, noting that it provided a high-quality recording experience comparable to more expensive models, while still being accessible to beginners and professionals alike.

15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to experiencing issues with the device's drivers or software compatibility. Some users felt that the interface did not meet their expectations in terms of advanced features, and believed that other products might offer better value for their investment.

85%
Quality of Materials

90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, praising its sturdy build and durable construction. Many noted that the interface felt solid and robust, giving them confidence in its long-term reliability. The sleek design and compact form factor were also commonly highlighted as positive aspects.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of materials, with some reporting issues like loose knobs or connectivity problems after extended use. A minority felt that the materials used did not justify the price, especially when compared to higher-end models in the market.

90%
Sound Quality

92% of users praised the sound quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, highlighting its clear and crisp audio output, which is crucial for professional recording. Users appreciated the low-latency performance and the high-quality preamps, which enhanced their recording sessions, making it a preferred choice for musicians and podcasters alike.

8% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, mainly pointing out occasional issues with noise interference or distortion. Some users experienced problems with the consistency of the audio output, which affected their overall recording quality.

92%
Ease of Use

88% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 easy to use, appreciating the straightforward setup process and intuitive control layout. The accompanying software was generally considered user-friendly, and many users, including beginners, were able to quickly integrate it into their recording setup without significant challenges.

12% of users were dissatisfied with the ease of use, primarily due to software installation issues or difficulties with driver updates. A small portion of users felt that the learning curve was steeper than expected, especially for those unfamiliar with audio interfaces.

88%
Driver Stability

80% of users reported satisfaction with the driver stability of the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, noting that once installed, the drivers performed reliably and supported consistent audio performance during recording sessions. Many appreciated that updates were regularly provided, ensuring compatibility with various operating systems.

20% of users were dissatisfied with driver stability, citing frequent crashes or compatibility issues with certain software environments. Some users experienced difficulties in maintaining stable connections, which occasionally interrupted their workflow, leading to frustration.

80%
Portability

87% of users appreciated the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, mentioning its compact size and lightweight nature as ideal for mobile recording setups. Users who frequently travel or work in different locations found the interface easy to transport without sacrificing performance or features.

13% of users were dissatisfied with the portability, often due to the requirement of additional cables or power sources that complicated mobile setups. Some users felt that while the device itself was portable, the need for accompanying equipment reduced its convenience.

87%
Software Integration

84% of users were satisfied with the software integration offered by the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, noting that it worked seamlessly with popular DAWs and offered useful plug-in bundles. The included software was considered a significant enhancement to the overall user experience.

16% of users expressed dissatisfaction with software integration, often due to issues with software compatibility or difficulties in setting up with their preferred digital audio workstations. Some users found the included software limiting or not as versatile as they had hoped.

84%
Versatility

89% of users rated the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 highly for versatility, appreciating its ability to handle a variety of recording needs from music production to podcasting. The multiple input and output options were particularly valued by those who require flexible recording setups.

11% of users were dissatisfied with the versatility, often feeling that the input/output options did not meet their specific or advanced needs. Some users desired additional features or configurations that were not available with this model.

89%
Latency

91% of users were pleased with the low latency performance of the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, noting that it provided smooth and real-time monitoring, which is essential for professional recording. Users found that the latency was minimal, allowing for precise and accurate recordings.

9% of users were dissatisfied with the latency, pointing out occasional lagging issues during intensive recording sessions. Some users felt that the latency, while generally low, was not competitive with higher-end audio interfaces.

91%
Aesthetic Design

94% of users were highly satisfied with the aesthetic design of the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, praising its sleek and modern appearance. The red metallic finish and streamlined design were frequently mentioned as stylish and visually appealing, which complemented their studio setups.

6% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the aesthetic design, feeling that it was too minimalistic or did not match their personal style preferences. A few users desired more varied design options or color choices.

94%
Connectivity

86% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, appreciating the multiple input and output ports that allowed for diverse recording configurations. The USB connection was noted as stable and reliable, facilitating easy integration with computers.

14% of users were dissatisfied with the connectivity, often due to issues with the USB connection or limited port options for their specific needs. Some users experienced occasional disconnections or had difficulty connecting with certain peripheral devices.

86%
Customer Support

82% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Focusrite, highlighting responsive and helpful service when troubleshooting issues or seeking product advice. Many users reported positive experiences with the support team, which enhanced their overall satisfaction with the product.

18% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delays in response times or unhelpful interactions. Some users felt that their issues were not adequately addressed, which affected their overall experience with the product.

82%
Durability

89% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, mentioning that it withstood regular use without significant wear or damage. The robust construction and solid materials were frequently highlighted as indicators of long-lasting quality.

11% of users were dissatisfied with the durability, reporting issues such as wear and tear on the knobs or connectivity ports over time. Some users felt that the device did not hold up well under heavy or prolonged use.

89%
Compatibility

83% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 to be highly compatible with various operating systems and DAWs, praising its versatility across different platforms. The ease of integration was noted as a key benefit, particularly for users with diverse recording setups.

17% of users were dissatisfied with compatibility, often encountering issues with specific software or hardware configurations. Some users experienced challenges in setting up or maintaining stable connections with their existing equipment.

83%
Input/Output Options

88% of users appreciated the range of input and output options provided by the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, which allowed for flexible recording and monitoring configurations. The availability of multiple ports was frequently praised for accommodating different audio sources.

12% of users were dissatisfied with the input/output options, feeling that the available ports did not meet their specific needs or were insufficient for more complex recording setups. Some users desired additional connectivity options or greater customization.

88%
Preamp Quality

93% of users were highly satisfied with the preamp quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, highlighting its clear and transparent sound reproduction. The high-quality preamps were often noted as a standout feature, enhancing the overall audio recording experience.

7% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the preamp quality, reporting occasional issues with noise or distortion. A few users felt that the preamps did not meet their expectations for professional-level recordings.

93%
Firmware Updates

81% of users were satisfied with the regular firmware updates provided by Focusrite, which ensured ongoing compatibility and performance improvements. Many users appreciated the company's commitment to maintaining and enhancing the device's functionality over time.

19% of users were dissatisfied with firmware updates, experiencing issues with the update process or encountering bugs after installation. Some users felt that updates were infrequent or did not adequately address existing problems.

81%
User Manual

84% of users found the user manual for the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 to be informative and helpful, providing clear instructions for setup and operation. Many users appreciated the comprehensive guidance, which supported a smooth onboarding experience.

16% of users were dissatisfied with the user manual, citing a lack of detail or clarity in certain sections. Some users felt that the manual did not adequately address specific issues or troubleshooting scenarios.

84%
MIDI Integration

86% of users were satisfied with the MIDI integration capabilities of the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, allowing for seamless connectivity with MIDI devices. Users appreciated the flexibility it provided for music production and live performance setups.

14% of users expressed dissatisfaction with MIDI integration, often encountering issues with latency or compatibility with certain MIDI equipment. Some users desired more advanced MIDI features or improved performance.

86%
Brand Reputation

93% of users had a positive perception of the Focusrite brand, associating it with high-quality audio equipment and reliable performance. The brand's reputation for excellence contributed to users' confidence in purchasing the Scarlett 4i4 model.

7% of users were dissatisfied with the brand reputation, often due to previous negative experiences with other products or perceived lapses in quality control. Some users felt that the brand did not meet their expectations based on its high standing.

93%

Pros:
High-quality Audient console mic preamps. USB Type-C connectivity for fast and reliable data transfer. 10 inputs and 6 outputs offering versatile connectivity options. JFET instrument input for a rich, tube-like sound. Expandability via ADAT for additional inputs. User-friendly software for easy control and configuration. Solid build quality with a sleek and compact design. Low-latency DSP mixer for real-time monitoring.	High-quality preamps with 24-bit/192kHz AD-DA converters. Compact and portable design. Two balanced line inputs for connecting external hardware. Includes MIDI I/O for connecting synths and controllers. Bundled with a comprehensive software package, including Ableton Live Lite. Easy to set up and use, with user-friendly software. Low latency performance.

Pros:

High-quality Audient console mic preamps.
USB Type-C connectivity for fast and reliable data transfer.
10 inputs and 6 outputs offering versatile connectivity options.
JFET instrument input for a rich, tube-like sound.
Expandability via ADAT for additional inputs.
User-friendly software for easy control and configuration.
Solid build quality with a sleek and compact design.
Low-latency DSP mixer for real-time monitoring.

High-quality preamps with 24-bit/192kHz AD-DA converters.
Compact and portable design.
Two balanced line inputs for connecting external hardware.
Includes MIDI I/O for connecting synths and controllers.
Bundled with a comprehensive software package, including Ableton Live Lite.
Easy to set up and use, with user-friendly software.
Low latency performance.

Cons:
No MIDI I/O which limits its use with MIDI controllers. External power supply needed for maximum performance. Limited onboard effects compared to some competitors. Higher price point may be a barrier for beginners. No dedicated line outputs, which might limit routing options.	Limited to four inputs and four outputs, which may not be enough for larger setups. Requires a computer with USB connectivity. No built-in DSP for real-time effects processing. Plastic knobs may feel less durable compared to metal ones. No dedicated power supply option; relies entirely on USB power.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 6 Outputs at 96 kHz Digital: 8 Input / 0 Output at 48 kHz	Analog: 4 Input / 4 Output at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	2 Preamps
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 4x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line/Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel) 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)	2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Input 4x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.11.6 or Later macOS 11.1 or Later Windows 7 or Later	macOS 10.12 or Later Windows 7 or Later
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 USB Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the Audient iD14 MKII Desktop 10x6 USB Type-C Audio Interface both offer robust features, but cater to slightly different needs in terms of input/output capabilities and maximum sampling rates.
In terms of channels of I/O, the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 provides analog I/O with 4 inputs and 4 outputs at a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz, while the Audient iD14 MKII offers 2 analog inputs and 6 outputs at 96 kHz, along with digital capabilities featuring 8 inputs at 48 kHz. This makes the Scarlett 4i4 more versatile in handling analog sources, whereas the Audient iD14 MKII stands out with its additional digital I/O options.
Both interfaces feature 2 microphone preamps, but their analog audio I/O configurations differ. The Scarlett 4i4 includes 2 combo XLR-1/4" TRS inputs for mic/line/Hi-Z signals and 2 additional 1/4" TRS balanced line inputs, along with 4 balanced line outputs and a single 1/4" TRS headphone output. In contrast, the Audient iD14 MKII offers 2 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line inputs, a dedicated 1/4" TRS unbalanced Hi-Z input, 4 balanced line/monitor outputs, and both 1/4" TRS and 1/8" TRS unbalanced headphone outputs, providing more flexibility for headphone monitoring.
Regarding host connections, both interfaces use USB-C and are compatible with macOS and Windows operating systems, although the Audient iD14 MKII supports macOS 11.1 or later in addition to macOS 10.11.6 or later. Both devices are USB bus-powered, ensuring easy setup and portability.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 excels in providing higher analog input/output flexibility and a higher maximum sampling rate, making it suitable for users needing extensive analog I/O capabilities. On the other hand, the Audient iD14 MKII offers additional digital input options and more versatile headphone monitoring, catering to users who might incorporate digital sources and require multiple headphone outputs.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 6 Outputs at 96 kHz Digital: 8 Input / 0 Output at 48 kHz	Analog: 4 Input / 4 Output at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	2 Preamps
Input Level Adjustment
2x Knob	2x Knob
Expansion Slots

The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 USB Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the Audient iD14 MKII Desktop 10x6 USB Type-C Audio Interface both offer professional-grade features, but they differ in several key areas.
The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 provides more channels of analog I/O compared to the Audient iD14 MKII, offering 4 input and 4 output channels at a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz/24-bit. This higher sampling rate can be advantageous for those who require ultra-high-fidelity recordings. In contrast, the Audient iD14 MKII offers 2 analog input channels and 6 output channels at a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz/24-bit. Additionally, the Audient features 8 digital input channels at 48 kHz, expanding its versatility in larger setups.
Both interfaces come equipped with 2 microphone preamps and offer input level adjustment through 2 knobs, ensuring precise control over audio levels. Neither device features expansion slots, so their respective capabilities are limited to the built-in specifications.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 stands out for its higher analog I/O channel count and superior maximum sampling rate, making it a strong choice for those needing extensive analog connectivity and high-resolution audio recording. Meanwhile, the Audient iD14 MKII offers additional digital input channels, which could be beneficial for users integrating multiple digital sources into their workflow.

Signal Processing
Pad
	Mic/Line/Hi-Z: -10 dB (Switchable per Channel)
Gain/Trim Range
Mic/Hi-Z Inputs: 58 dB Hi-Z Inputs: 40 dB	Inputs: Up to +56 dB
High-Pass Filter

Solo/Mute

The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 USB Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the Audient iD14 MKII Desktop 10x6 USB Type-C Audio Interface each offer distinct features tailored to various audio recording and production needs. When comparing these two products on the specific features mentioned, several differences and similarities emerge.
In terms of the Pad feature, the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 provides a switchable pad of -10 dB for each channel, applicable to Mic/Line/Hi-Z inputs. This allows users flexibility in handling high-level input signals by reducing their amplitude, which can prevent distortion and ensure cleaner recordings. On the other hand, the Audient iD14 MKII does not include a pad feature, which may limit its ability to handle particularly loud input signals without additional external attenuation.
Regarding the Gain/Trim Range, the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 offers up to +56 dB for its inputs, which is fairly robust and provides ample headroom for various recording scenarios. The Audient iD14 MKII, however, offers a slightly higher gain range for its Mic/Hi-Z inputs at 58 dB, though it provides 40 dB for Hi-Z inputs specifically. This slight edge in gain range can be beneficial for capturing quieter sources with higher fidelity, although the difference may be subtle in practical use.
Both interfaces lack a High-Pass Filter feature, which means users will need to apply any necessary low-frequency cuts during the mixing phase or use external filtering tools. This omission is consistent across both devices, so users will need to consider their workflow and whether external solutions are available or preferable for their specific needs.
Finally, neither the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 nor the Audient iD14 MKII includes Solo/Mute functionality. This absence means that users will not be able to solo or mute tracks directly on the interface hardware and will need to manage these aspects within their Digital Audio Workstation (DAW) software.
In summary, while both the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 and the Audient iD14 MKII have their strengths, the choice between them may come down to the specific needs of the user, such as the importance of a switchable pad or the slight differences in gain range. Both interfaces are highly capable and offer high-quality audio recording capabilities, making them suitable for a range of professional and amateur recording setups.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 4x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line/Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel) 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)	2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Input 4x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Phantom Power
48 V ± 4 V, Selectable On/Off (Selectable on Individual Inputs)	48 V, Selectable On/Off (on 2 Channels)
Digital Audio I/O
1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Input (S/MUX Support)
Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
USB 3.0 / 3.1/3.2 Gen 1	USB 2.0
MIDI I/O
	1x DIN 5-Pin Input 1x DIN 5-Pin Output

The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 USB Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the Audient iD14 MKII Desktop 10x6 USB Type-C Audio Interface differ significantly in their features and specifications.
The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 offers a range of analog audio I/O options including 2 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced mic/line/Hi-Z inputs on the front panel, 2 additional 1/4" TRS balanced line inputs, 4 1/4" TRS balanced line outputs, and a 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output on the front panel. It provides 48V phantom power selectable on two channels. It also includes MIDI I/O with one DIN 5-pin input and one DIN 5-pin output, which is absent in the Audient iD14 MKII. The Scarlett 4i4 uses a USB-C host connection with USB 2.0 protocol and does not support digital audio I/O.
In contrast, the Audient iD14 MKII features 2 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line inputs and a 1/4" TRS unbalanced Hi-Z input on the front panel. It also includes 4 1/4" TRS balanced line/monitor outputs, a 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output, and an additional 1/8" (3.5 mm) TRS unbalanced headphone output on the front panel. The Audient iD14 MKII provides 48V phantom power, selectable on individual inputs, with a phantom power current of 10 mA per channel. It supports digital audio I/O via a TOSLINK optical ADAT / S/PDIF input with S/MUX support, allowing for expanded connectivity that the Scarlett 4i4 lacks. The Audient iD14 MKII uses a USB-C host connection with USB 3.0/3.1/3.2 Gen 1 protocol and does not include MIDI I/O.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 is better suited for users needing MIDI connectivity along with a straightforward analog I/O setup, whereas the Audient iD14 MKII offers more advanced digital audio I/O options and higher host connection speed, making it ideal for those who require additional digital connectivity and higher data transfer rates.

Performance
Frequency Response
A/D Converters: 10 Hz to 40 kHz ±0.5 dB D/A Converters: 10 Hz to 40 kHz ±0.1 dB Headphone Outputs: 10 Hz to 40 kHz ±0.25 dB Mic, Line Inputs: 10 Hz to 40 kHz ±0.5 dB (Min Gain) 20 Hz to 22 kHz ±1 dB (Max Gain) Hi-Z Inputs: 10 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.5 dB	Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.1 dB
Maximum Input Level
Mic Inputs: +12 dBu Line Inputs: +21 dBu Hi-Z Inputs: +10 dBu	Mic Inputs: +9 dBu (Min Gain) +16 dBu (Min Gain, with Pad) Hi-Z Inputs: +12.5 dBu (Min Gain) +14 dBu (Min Gain, with Pad) Line Inputs: +22 dBu (Min Gain) +29 dBu (Min Gain, with Pad)
Maximum Output Level
Headphone Outputs: +5.46 Vrms (600-Ohm Load)	Monitor/Line Outputs: +15.5 dBu at 0 dBFS Headphone Outputs: +7 dBu
Impedance
Mic Inputs: 2.8 Kilohms (Balanced) Line Inputs: > 8 Kilohms (Balanced)	Mic Inputs: 3 Kilohms Hi-Z Inputs: 1.5 Megohms Line Inputs: 60 Kilohms Line Outputs: 430 Ohms Headphone Outputs: < 1 Ohm
Dynamic Range
A/D Converters: 120 dB (A-Weighted) D/A Converters: 125.5 dB (A-Weighted) Headphone Outputs: 125.5 dB (A-Weighted)	Mic Inputs: 111 dBA Hi-Z Inputs: 110 dBA Line Inputs: 110.5 dBA Line Outputs: 108 dBA Headphone Outputs: 104 dBA
THD+N
Mic/Line Inputs: 0.0017% (at 0 dBu) Hi-Z Inputs: 0.1% (at 0 dBu) A/D Converters: < 0.001% (at -1 dBFS) D/A Converters: < 0.0006% (at -1 dBFS) Headphone Outputs: < 0.0009% (at -1 dBFS)	Mic Inputs: < 0.0012% Hi-Z Inputs: < 0.03% Line Inputs: < 0.002% Line Outputs: < 0.002% Headphone Outputs: < 0.002%
EIN
Mic/Line Inputs: -129 dBu A-Weighted	Mic Inputs: -128 dBu A-Weighted

The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 and the Audient iD14 MKII both offer high-quality audio interfaces, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences based on their specifications.
The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 (3rd Generation) features a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz with a very tight tolerance of ±0.1 dB for inputs. It can handle a maximum input level of +9 dBu for mic inputs (up to +16 dBu with pad), +12.5 dBu for Hi-Z inputs (up to +14 dBu with pad), and +22 dBu for line inputs (up to +29 dBu with pad). Its maximum output level is +15.5 dBu for monitor/line outputs and +7 dBu for headphone outputs. The input impedance specifications include 3 Kilohms for mic inputs, 1.5 Megohms for Hi-Z inputs, and 60 Kilohms for line inputs, while the output impedance is 430 Ohms for line outputs and less than 1 Ohm for headphone outputs. The dynamic range is 111 dBA for mic inputs, 110 dBA for Hi-Z inputs, 110.5 dBA for line inputs, 108 dBA for line outputs, and 104 dBA for headphone outputs. The Total Harmonic Distortion plus Noise (THD+N) is less than 0.0012% for mic inputs, less than 0.03% for Hi-Z inputs, less than 0.002% for line inputs and outputs, and less than 0.002% for headphone outputs. The Equivalent Input Noise (EIN) for mic inputs is -128 dBu A-weighted.
On the other hand, the Audient iD14 MKII boasts a more extended frequency response of 10 Hz to 40 kHz for A/D and D/A converters, and a range of 10 Hz to 20 kHz for Hi-Z inputs with a tolerance of ±0.5 dB. The maximum input levels are +12 dBu for mic inputs, +21 dBu for line inputs, and +10 dBu for Hi-Z inputs. Its headphone outputs can deliver a maximum output level of +5.46 Vrms (600-Ohm load). The headphone output power is substantial: 223 mW into 30 Ohms, 280 mW into 62 Ohms, and 100 mW into 600 Ohms. The input impedance for mic inputs is 2.8 Kilohms, and for line inputs, it is greater than 8 Kilohms. The dynamic range is impressive, with 120 dB for A/D converters and 125.5 dB for D/A converters and headphone outputs. Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) is 101 dBu for mic/line inputs and 100 dBu for Hi-Z inputs. The THD+N is 0.0017% for mic/line inputs, 0.1% for Hi-Z inputs, less than 0.001% for A/D converters, less than 0.0006% for D/A converters, and less than 0.0009% for headphone outputs. The EIN for mic/line inputs is -129 dBu A-weighted, and the Common Mode Rejection Ratio (CMRR) for mic/line inputs is greater than -75 dB at 1 kHz.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 provides a solid performance with respectable dynamic range and low THD+N, making it suitable for various recording needs. Meanwhile, the Audient iD14 MKII offers an extended frequency response, higher dynamic range, and superior THD+N performance, making it a robust choice for professional audio applications demanding high fidelity and precision.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 kHz	Up to 192 kHz (AD/DA Conversion)
Sample Rate Conversion

Bit Depths
24-Bit	Up to 24-Bit (AD/DA Conversion)
Sync Sources
ADAT, Internal, S/PDIF	Internal

The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 USB Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the Audient iD14 MKII Desktop 10x6 USB Type-C Audio Interface offer distinct specifications catering to different aspects of audio recording and production.
The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 supports sample rates up to 192 kHz with AD/DA conversion and a bit depth of up to 24-bit, ensuring high-resolution audio capture and playback. It relies solely on internal sync sources, and it does not support sample rate conversion.
Conversely, the Audient iD14 MKII offers sample rates of 44.1, 48, 88.2, and 96 kHz, also with a bit depth of 24-bit. Unlike the Scarlett 4i4, the iD14 MKII provides additional sync sources, including ADAT, Internal, and S/PDIF, which can be advantageous for more complex setups requiring synchronization with various digital audio sources. The iD14 MKII also boasts impressive low-latency performance, with a latency of 0.65 ms at 44.1 kHz and 0.31 ms at 96 kHz, which is highly dependent on buffer size.
In summary, while the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 offers a wider range of sample rates for high-resolution audio needs, the Audient iD14 MKII provides more versatile sync options and superior low-latency performance, catering to users who require robust synchronization and minimal latency in their recording setup.

Audio Storage & Playback
Memory Card Slot

The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 USB Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the Audient iD14 MKII Desktop 10x6 USB Type-C Audio Interface both lack a memory card slot, which is a point of parity between the two devices. This means that neither of these audio interfaces offer direct recording or playback capabilities via memory cards, concentrating their functionalities on audio and MIDI interfacing for computer-based recording setups.
The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, being part of the well-regarded Scarlett series, offers robust connectivity and high-quality preamps. It features four balanced line inputs, four balanced outputs, and MIDI I/O, providing a versatile setup for small home studios or mobile recording rigs. The 4i4 comes with two Scarlett mic preamps with switchable Air mode to give your recordings a brighter and more open sound. The unit connects via USB, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of computers and software.
On the other hand, the Audient iD14 MKII is equipped with two Audient Console mic preamps known for their professional studio-grade quality. The iD14 MKII offers a total of 10 inputs and 6 outputs, including an optical input that allows for expansion with ADAT-compatible devices. This makes it suitable for more complex recording setups. The iD14 MKII connects via USB Type-C, ensuring fast data transfer and low latency. Additionally, it features the ScrollControl function, which allows the volume knob to be used to control various parameters in your DAW, providing a tactile interface option.
In summary, while both the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 and the Audient iD14 MKII lack a memory card slot, they offer different strengths in terms of connectivity and preamp quality. The Scarlett 4i4 is designed for simplicity and ease of use with versatile connectivity, while the iD14 MKII targets users who need higher input and output counts and professional-grade preamps with additional features like ScrollControl.

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.11.6 or Later macOS 11.1 or Later Windows 7 or Later	macOS 10.12 or Later Windows 7 or Later
Mobile Device Compatibility

Required Hardware
Available USB-C Port USB Cable (Included)	Available USB 2.0 Port USB Cable (Included)
Internet Connection
Required for Registration, Software/Driver Download	Required for Software/Driver Download

The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 USB Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the Audient iD14 MKII Desktop 10x6 USB Type-C Audio Interface are both popular choices for audio recording and production, but they have distinct differences in terms of OS compatibility, required hardware, and internet connection requirements.
The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 is compatible with macOS 10.12 or later and Windows 7 or later, providing a broad range of OS support for both Mac and PC users. It does not support mobile devices. The required hardware includes an available USB 2.0 port, and a USB cable is included in the package. An internet connection is necessary for software and driver downloads, ensuring the device operates with the latest updates and functionalities.
On the other hand, the Audient iD14 MKII is compatible with macOS 10.11.6 or later, macOS 11.1 or later, and Windows 7 or later, making it suitable for users with both older and newer versions of macOS, including those with Apple M1 chips. This interface also does not support mobile devices. The required hardware for the Audient iD14 MKII includes an available USB-C port, and a USB cable is included with the product. An internet connection is required for registration and software/driver downloads, similar to the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, ensuring that users can access necessary software and updates.
In terms of processor requirements, the Audient iD14 MKII specifies a 1.6 GHz Intel Core 2 processor for PC users and is compatible with Intel and Apple M1 processors for Mac users. Additionally, it requires 1 GB of RAM. The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4, however, does not specify processor or RAM requirements, which could imply a broader range of compatibility with various computer configurations.
In summary, both the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 and the Audient iD14 MKII offer extensive OS compatibility and require internet connections for updates and driver downloads. The key differences lie in the type of USB port required—USB 2.0 for the Scarlett 4i4 and USB-C for the iD14 MKII—as well as the additional processor and RAM requirements specified by the Audient iD14 MKII.

Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 USB Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the Audient iD14 MKII Desktop 10x6 USB Type-C Audio Interface both share a key feature in terms of power requirements: they are both powered via USB bus power. This means that neither of these interfaces requires an external power supply, making them highly portable and convenient for mobile recording setups or home studios where minimizing cable clutter is a priority.
The Scarlett 4i4 from Focusrite is designed to be a versatile and user-friendly interface, offering a combination of four inputs and four outputs. It includes two high-quality mic/line/instrument inputs and two additional line inputs. Additionally, it features MIDI I/O, allowing you to connect and control external MIDI instruments. The 4i4 also boasts Focusrite's acclaimed preamps, ensuring high-quality audio capture, with a focus on clarity and low noise.
On the other hand, the Audient iD14 MKII provides a more extensive input/output configuration with a 10x6 setup. It includes two Audient Console mic preamps, known for their professional-grade sound quality and clarity. The iD14 MKII also features a JFET DI input, which is particularly well-regarded for capturing the nuances of electric guitars and other instruments. The interface is equipped with optical input, which allows for expansion with additional channels via ADAT, making it a more scalable option for those who anticipate needing more inputs in the future.
Both interfaces are bus-powered, emphasizing portability and ease of use. However, the iD14 MKII's additional features, such as the JFET DI and optical input, make it a slightly more flexible choice for those who may need to expand their setup. Meanwhile, the Scarlett 4i4 provides a balanced mix of inputs and MIDI capabilities, appealing to users who prioritize simplicity and high-quality preamps in a compact form factor.

Physical
Anti-Theft Features
Kensington Security Slot	Kensington Security Slot
Dimensions
6.8 x 4.7 x 2.4" / 17.3 x 12 x 6.2 cm (Including Controls and Protrusions)	7.28 x 4.71 x 1.87" / 18.49 x 11.96 x 4.75 cm

The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 USB Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the Audient iD14 MKII Desktop 10x6 USB Type-C Audio Interface both offer anti-theft features with the inclusion of a Kensington Security Slot, providing users with a method to secure their devices.
In terms of dimensions, the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 measures 7.28 x 4.71 x 1.87 inches (18.49 x 11.96 x 4.75 cm), making it slightly larger in length and width but slimmer in height compared to the Audient iD14 MKII, which measures 6.8 x 4.7 x 2.4 inches (17.3 x 12 x 6.2 cm, including controls and protrusions). This makes the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 a bit more compact in terms of vertical space, while the Audient iD14 MKII is more compact in its footprint.
The weight of the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 is 1.4 lb (0.6 kg), which is not specified in the Audient iD14 MKII's provided specifications. However, based on the common design and build materials of such interfaces, users can expect a similar weight for portability.
Both interfaces provide robust features suited for desktop audio production environments, with slight differences in their physical dimensions and security features ensuring they remain securely placed in any setup.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
2.33 lb	1.81 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
9 x 6 x 3.6"	8.5 x 6.5 x 2.4"

The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 USB Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the Audient iD14 MKII Desktop 10x6 USB Type-C Audio Interface each offer distinct specifications in terms of package weight and box dimensions.
The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 (3rd Generation) has a package weight of 1.81 lb and comes in a box with dimensions of 8.5 x 6.5 x 2.4 inches. This compact and lightweight design makes it a portable and convenient choice for musicians and producers who need to carry their interface on the go.
In contrast, the Audient iD14 MKII Desktop 10x6 USB Type-C Audio Interface has a slightly heavier package weight of 2.33 lb and comes in a larger box with dimensions of 9 x 6 x 3.6 inches. While it is a bit bulkier compared to the Scarlett 4i4, the iD14 MKII still maintains a relatively compact form, suitable for desktop studio setups where a bit more space is available.
In summary, while both interfaces are designed for portability and ease of use, the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 is lighter and more compact, making it ideal for mobile use. The Audient iD14 MKII, on the other hand, offers a slightly larger and heavier package, which might be preferable for users seeking a robust desktop solution.