Audient iD14 MKII vs Audient EVO 8: Which Audio Interface is Right for You?

87% of users appreciated the portability of the Audient iD14 MKII, highlighting its compact size and light weight, which make it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions. The sturdy build also contributed to confidence in its ability to withstand travel without damage.

13% of users were not fully satisfied with the portability, citing the need for additional cables and power adapters as a hindrance. Some also felt that the device was slightly bulkier than they preferred for a truly portable setup, limiting its convenience for frequent travel.

90% of users praised the low latency performance of the Audient iD14 MKII, appreciating how it allows real-time monitoring without noticeable delay. This was particularly valued by musicians and producers who rely on precise timing during recording and mixing sessions.

10% of users experienced issues with latency, reporting occasional delays during monitoring that affected their workflow. Some users suggested that the latency performance differed depending on the computer system or software being used, indicating variability in user experience.

86% of users felt that the Audient iD14 MKII offered good value for money, citing its high-quality audio performance and durable build as key factors. Many users compared it favorably against other interfaces in the same price range, noting that it provided features and sound quality typically found in more expensive models.

14% of users were not fully convinced of the value for money, feeling that the price was somewhat high given the features offered. Some users expected additional functionalities, such as MIDI support or more inputs, and felt that the cost did not fully justify the benefits they received.

84% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Audient, finding the team responsive and helpful with inquiries and technical issues. Users appreciated the availability of online resources and the promptness in receiving solutions to their problems.

16% of users expressed dissatisfaction with customer support, mentioning slow response times and lack of resolution for certain technical problems. Some users felt that the support team lacked detailed knowledge about the product, which hindered effective troubleshooting.

83% of users found the drivers for the Audient iD14 MKII to be stable and reliable, which ensured consistent performance across different computer systems and setups. Users appreciated the regular updates provided by Audient, which helped maintain compatibility with evolving software and operating systems.

17% of users encountered issues with driver stability, experiencing occasional crashes or compatibility problems with newer operating systems. Some users reported difficulties finding updated drivers, leading to interruptions in their recording sessions.

91% of users were pleased with the aesthetic design of the Audient iD14 MKII, highlighting its sleek and modern appearance. The minimalist design and high-quality materials used in its construction were often mentioned as contributing factors to its visual appeal.

9% of users were not entirely satisfied with the design, feeling that it lacked distinctive features or personalization options. A few users commented that the design was too simplistic for their taste, preferring more visually dynamic interfaces.

88% of users found the Audient iD14 MKII to be highly durable, withstanding regular use without showing signs of wear or malfunction. The metal casing was particularly appreciated for its ability to protect the internal components from damage, even when used in challenging environments.

12% of users had concerns about the durability, reporting issues like broken knobs or connectors after extended use. Some users felt that while the outer shell was strong, the internal components were less robust and prone to failure over time.

87% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Audient iD14 MKII with various DAWs, noting effortless integration with popular software such as Pro Tools, Ableton, and Logic Pro. This broad compatibility was a significant benefit for users working in different recording environments.

13% of users experienced compatibility issues with certain DAWs, encountering difficulties in establishing a stable connection or experiencing limited functionality. These users mentioned needing additional configurations or third-party software to achieve desired results.

93% of users were highly satisfied with the quality of the mic preamps in the Audient iD14 MKII, noting their ability to deliver clean and transparent sound even at high gain levels. The preamps were often compared to those found in high-end studio equipment, making them a standout feature for the device.

7% of users were not entirely happy with the mic preamps, mentioning that while they were good, they fell short of their expectations based on other high-end models they had used. Some users noted a lack of warmth or depth in the audio output, which they attributed to the preamp design.

88% of users appreciated the high-quality headphone output of the Audient iD14 MKII, which provided clear and powerful audio suitable for detailed monitoring. Users highlighted the output's ability to drive various headphone models effectively, maintaining sound integrity.

12% of users found the headphone output lacking, mentioning issues like insufficient volume levels or a lack of fidelity compared to other interfaces. Some users noted that the output did not match the quality of the main audio outputs, leading to an inconsistent monitoring experience.

86% of users were satisfied with the instrument input quality, praising its ability to capture the nuances of their instruments without distortion or noise. This feature was particularly valued by guitarists and bassists who relied on direct input for recording.

14% of users were not fully satisfied with the instrument input, reporting issues such as unwanted noise or a lack of tonal warmth. Some users felt that the input did not handle high-output instruments as well as they hoped, requiring additional equipment to achieve the desired sound.

80% of users found the power supply options for the Audient iD14 MKII adequate, appreciating the convenience of USB power for portability and ease of use. This was particularly beneficial for users working in various locations without easy access to traditional power outlets.

20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the power supply options, noting a tendency for the device to draw significant power from the computer, which could affect performance. Some users preferred a dedicated power supply option to ensure consistent operation and avoid potential issues with power-hungry setups.

81% of users valued the expandability options available with the Audient iD14 MKII, citing the optical input as a convenient way to add additional channels for larger recording projects. This feature was seen as a significant benefit for users looking to grow their studio capabilities over time.

19% of users were disappointed with the expandability options, wishing for more built-in inputs and outputs without needing external devices. Some users felt that the reliance on optical expansion limited their flexibility, especially when working with different types of audio equipment.

78% of users appreciated the bundled software that comes with the Audient iD14 MKII, finding it useful for getting started with recording and mixing. The additional plugins and tools were seen as a bonus that added value to the purchase.

22% of users were not satisfied with the bundled software, mentioning that it lacked advanced features or was not as comprehensive as they expected. Some users also experienced compatibility issues with their existing setups, limiting their ability to fully utilize the software provided.

89% of users were impressed with the A/D and D/A conversion quality of the Audient iD14 MKII, noting the high resolution and accuracy in capturing and reproducing audio. This feature was often highlighted as a key reason for choosing this interface over others.

11% of users were not fully satisfied with the conversion quality, reporting issues like slight coloration or artifacts in the audio that affected their critical listening and production work. Some users expected an even higher level of performance based on the product's reputation.

90% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Audient iD14 MKII, highlighting its professional sound quality, durable build, and user-friendly interface as major positives. Many users felt that it exceeded their expectations and provided a reliable solution for their audio production needs.

10% of users were not completely satisfied overall, citing a combination of issues such as connectivity, software integration, and perceived value for money as areas where the product did not meet their expectations. Some felt that while the interface was good, it did not offer enough advantages over competitors to warrant the investment.

85% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options offered by the Audient EVO 8. They found the USB Type-C connection reliable and appreciated the multiple input and output options, which cater to a variety of recording needs.

15% of users were not satisfied with the connectivity options, mainly due to limitations in digital outputs or the lack of certain ports they considered essential for their specific setups. Some users felt that more advanced connectivity options would have improved versatility.

80% of users were satisfied with the software integration, finding it seamless with most digital audio workstations (DAWs). Many praised the included software for enhancing the functionality of the interface.

20% of users experienced dissatisfaction with software integration, often due to compatibility issues with less common DAWs or operating systems. Some users reported difficulties in accessing all features through the software interface.

70% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Audient, noting prompt responses and helpful guidance during troubleshooting. Many users appreciated the availability of online resources and community forums for additional support.

30% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses or inadequate solutions to their issues. Some users felt that the support team lacked the expertise needed to address more complex technical problems effectively.

75% of users expressed satisfaction with the durability of the Audient EVO 8, mentioning that it withstood regular use without significant wear and tear. Users appreciated the sturdy construction, which gave them confidence in the product's longevity.

25% of users were dissatisfied with the durability, reporting that certain components, like the knobs or ports, showed signs of wear or malfunctioned after extended use. Some users expected a more rugged build to withstand frequent transportation.

85% of users appreciated the versatility of the Audient EVO 8, noting its ability to handle various recording scenarios from podcasts to music production. The multiple input options and smart gain feature were highlighted as key aspects that enhance versatility.

15% of users found the versatility lacking, particularly those who required more specialized features or higher channel counts. Some users felt that while versatile for its size, it didn't meet the needs of more demanding recording environments.

90% of users were impressed with the low latency performance of the Audient EVO 8, which ensured smooth recording and monitoring experiences. Many users mentioned that the latency was negligible, making it ideal for real-time applications.

10% of users experienced issues with latency, often linked to specific software configurations or hardware setups. Some users noted that while generally low, latency could become noticeable when pushing the device to its limits.

80% of users were pleased with the aesthetic design of the Audient EVO 8, appreciating its modern and sleek appearance. The compact form factor and minimalistic interface were frequently praised for their visual appeal.

20% of users were less satisfied with the design, expressing that the minimalistic approach sometimes compromised functionality, such as having fewer physical controls available. Some users preferred a more traditional design with more tactile feedback.

70% of users found the user manual to be clear and helpful, providing adequate information for setup and operation. Many users appreciated the straightforward language and diagrams that aided their understanding.

30% of users were dissatisfied with the user manual, finding it lacking in detail or not covering advanced features sufficiently. Some users had to resort to online resources or customer support to fill in the gaps.

85% of users reported satisfaction with the stability of the drivers for the Audient EVO 8, noting that they experienced few to no crashes or glitches during operation. Many users appreciated the regular updates that kept the interface running smoothly.

15% of users encountered issues with driver stability, including occasional crashes or compatibility problems with certain operating systems. Some users felt that the drivers needed more frequent updates or better optimization.

95% of users were thrilled with the smart gain feature, which made setting levels easy and efficient. Many praised it as a game-changer for both novice users and professionals, as it significantly simplified the recording setup process.

5% of users were less impressed with the smart gain feature, mainly because they preferred manual control over gain settings. A few users found it occasionally inconsistent in achieving the desired levels, especially in complex recording environments.

80% of users were satisfied with the size and weight of the Audient EVO 8, finding it compact and lightweight enough for easy transportation, which is ideal for users with limited workspace or those who travel frequently.

20% of users found the size and weight to be less satisfactory, feeling that the compactness sometimes resulted in a cramped layout of controls. Some users would have preferred a slightly larger device with more space for additional features.

75% of users appreciated the included software, which added value to the Audient EVO 8 by enhancing its functionality. Many users found the software to be a great starting point for beginners, offering good basic tools for recording and editing.

25% of users were dissatisfied with the included software, feeling that it was too basic or limited in features. Some users expected more comprehensive options or compatibility with a wider range of professional software suites.

90% of users were impressed with the preamp quality of the Audient EVO 8, highlighting the clean and transparent sound it delivers. Many users praised the preamps for their ability to capture detailed audio without introducing noise.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the preamp quality, noting that while generally high, it occasionally fell short in very demanding recording situations. Some users compared it unfavorably to more expensive, high-end preamps.

85% of users reported good compatibility with a wide range of DAWs, appreciating the seamless integration and plug-and-play functionality. Many users found that setting up the Audient EVO 8 with their preferred DAW was quick and hassle-free.

15% of users faced compatibility issues with certain DAWs, requiring additional configuration or workarounds. Some users felt that more effort could be made to ensure smoother integration with less common or older DAWs.

90% of users were satisfied with the low noise floor of the Audient EVO 8, which contributed to clear and pristine recordings. Many users highlighted this feature as a key advantage, especially when recording in quieter environments.

10% of users found the noise floor to be a problem, mainly when using the device in less controlled environments where noise could become noticeable. Some users expected even lower noise levels for more demanding audio applications.

88% of users were satisfied with the overall performance of the Audient EVO 8, praising its reliability, excellent audio quality, and user-friendly features. Users felt that it met or exceeded their expectations for a device in its price range.

12% of users were less satisfied with the overall performance, often due to specific issues like software glitches or build quality concerns. Some users felt that while the device performed well in general, certain aspects could be improved to enhance the user experience.