Mackie ProFX16v3 vs Mackie Onyx16: Which Mixer is Right for You?

87% of users trusted the Mackie ProFX16v3 for its reliable performance in various settings, including live shows and studio recordings. They reported minimal issues with functionality over time, attributing this to the high-quality components and robust design.

13% of users experienced reliability issues, such as unexpected shutdowns or malfunctions during critical performances. These instances, though not widespread, were significant enough to cause inconvenience and frustration for the affected users.

78% of users were pleased with the technical support provided by Mackie, citing quick response times and helpful solutions to their queries. Many users appreciated the availability of online resources and forums which provided additional support.

22% of users, however, were dissatisfied with the level of support received. They reported delayed responses and difficulty in reaching knowledgeable support staff, which left some issues unresolved for extended periods.

91% of users valued the versatility of the Mackie ProFX16v3, noting that it adapts well to a variety of audio applications from live sound to studio sessions. The multiple input options and effects allow users to tailor the mixer to suit different needs and environments.

9% of users felt that while versatile, the mixer lacked in-depth customization options for advanced users. They expressed a desire for more programmable features and effects to cater to more complex audio setups.

89% of users were impressed with the ProFX16v3's built-in effects, particularly the high-quality reverbs and delays. Users found these effects to be easy to use and beneficial in enhancing the overall sound quality during performances.

11% of users, however, found the effects to be somewhat limited in variety and depth. They reported that while useful, the effects did not meet the expectations of those looking for more specialized or intricate sound shaping options.

86% of users appreciated the design of the Mackie ProFX16v3, highlighting its professional appearance and ergonomic layout. They found the interface to be well-organized, which facilitates easy access to controls and settings.

14% of users critiqued the design, pointing out that certain controls were not as intuitive as they could be. Some users mentioned that the labeling was not always clear, which led to occasional confusion during operation.

84% of users were satisfied with the mixer’s durability, noting that it withstands frequent use and transportation without significant wear and tear. Many users trusted it for regular gigs and events due to its solid construction.

16% of users reported durability issues, such as components wearing out faster than expected. Concerns were raised about the longevity of certain parts, particularly in high-stress usage environments.

93% of users were highly satisfied with the connectivity options available on the Mackie ProFX16v3. They appreciated the variety of inputs and outputs, which allow for seamless integration with different audio setups and equipment.

7% of users found the connectivity options to be somewhat limited, particularly those looking for more digital or networked audio solutions. They felt that additional modern connectivity features could enhance the mixer's versatility.

88% of users were pleased with the smooth and responsive nature of the faders on the Mackie ProFX16v3. They found the faders to provide precise control over audio levels, which is crucial for achieving the desired sound balance.

12% of users reported issues with the faders, such as stiffness or uneven response. Some noted that the faders became less responsive over time, which affected their ability to finely control audio levels.

94% of users raved about the quality of the Onyx preamps, which deliver clear and dynamic sound with minimal noise. Users appreciated the high headroom and transparency of the preamps, which significantly enhance the audio quality.

6% of users had concerns about the preamps, noting occasional noise issues or insufficient gain for certain microphones. While these issues were rare, they were significant for users requiring pristine audio quality.

80% of users were satisfied with how the Mackie ProFX16v3 integrates with digital audio software, particularly praising the seamless setup process and compatibility with popular DAWs. This makes it a versatile choice for digital recording environments.

20% of users experienced challenges with software integration, citing compatibility issues with certain DAWs or difficulties in setting up digital connections. These users often required additional troubleshooting or support to resolve their issues.

83% of users found the channel count on the ProFX16v3 to be sufficient for most applications. The 16-channel layout provides ample input options for small to mid-sized events and recordings, which meets the needs of many users.

17% of users desired more channels, especially those involved in larger or more complex audio productions. They felt that additional channels would allow for more flexibility and accommodate larger setups without requiring external equipment.

81% of users were content with the auxiliary send options, which provide flexibility in routing audio to monitors and effects. This feature is particularly valued in live settings where multiple audio outputs are needed.

19% of users felt that the auxiliary sends were somewhat limited, expressing a desire for more sends or additional routing capabilities to enhance sound management during complex audio productions.

87% of users appreciated the clear and accurate LED metering on the Mackie ProFX16v3. They found it helpful for monitoring audio levels and ensuring optimal sound performance during both live and studio sessions.

13% of users found the LED metering to be a bit basic, suggesting that more detailed or customizable metering options could improve their ability to fine-tune audio levels and prevent clipping.

84% of users found the USB recording feature to be highly useful, allowing for straightforward recording of sessions directly to a computer. This functionality is particularly appreciated by users who frequently transition between live and studio environments.

16% of users experienced issues with USB recording, such as latency or connectivity problems. These users found the setup process to be more complex than anticipated, sometimes requiring additional troubleshooting to achieve optimal performance.

86% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the Mackie ProFX16v3, which is crucial for live sound applications and real-time monitoring. This allows for smooth operation without noticeable delays in audio processing.

14% of users reported latency issues, particularly when using the mixer with certain digital audio workstations or during complex setups. These latency problems were disruptive for users requiring precise timing and synchronization.

87% of users commended the Mackie Onyx16 for its durability, reporting that it withstood regular use without significant wear or technical issues. The sturdy build quality was a highlight for users who needed reliable equipment for frequent use.

13% of users experienced issues with durability, noting occasional malfunctioning of components like knobs and faders that affected their long-term confidence in the mixer’s build.

80% of users were satisfied with the feature set of the Mackie Onyx16, appreciating the range of inputs, effects, and routing options that offered versatility for different audio applications.

20% of users felt that the mixer lacked some advanced features found in competing models, which limited their ability to perform certain tasks, leading to their dissatisfaction.

78% of users reported positive experiences with customer support, praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of Mackie’s service team in resolving technical issues and answering queries.

22% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delays in response times and lack of effective solutions as the primary reasons for their negative experiences.

85% of users appreciated the aesthetic and functional design of the Mackie Onyx16, noting that its sleek appearance and ergonomic layout enhanced their overall user experience.

15% of users were not satisfied with the design, feeling that it was outdated or lacked modern styling elements that could enhance its appeal in professional settings.

82% of users found the Mackie Onyx16 to be highly compatible with various audio setups and software, which made integration into existing systems straightforward and efficient.

18% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with certain digital audio workstations (DAWs), which complicated their workflow and led to dissatisfaction.

84% of users were pleased with the connectivity options available on the Mackie Onyx16, highlighting the abundance of input and output options as a major advantage for diverse audio configurations.

16% of users were dissatisfied with connectivity, noting limitations in the number or type of ports available, which restricted their ability to connect all necessary equipment.

86% of users praised the Mackie Onyx16 for its versatility, noting that it performed well across various audio tasks, from live performances to studio recordings, offering flexibility in application.

14% of users felt the mixer was not versatile enough for their specific needs, particularly when handling complex audio setups that required more specialized features.

89% of users were impressed by the quality of the preamps in the Mackie Onyx16, noting the clear and noise-free amplification as a significant benefit for high-fidelity audio production.

11% of users experienced issues with preamp quality, mentioning that they occasionally introduced noise or distortion, which detracted from their audio quality expectations.

88% of users found the Mackie Onyx16 to be reliable, with consistent performance reported across various usage scenarios, which contributed to their trust in the mixer for critical audio tasks.

12% of users faced reliability issues, experiencing sporadic technical problems such as audio dropouts or control malfunctions, impacting their confidence in the device.

77% of users found the user manual to be helpful, providing clear instructions and troubleshooting tips that facilitated easy setup and operation.

23% of users were dissatisfied with the user manual, citing it as incomplete or difficult to understand, which made it challenging to fully utilize the mixer’s capabilities.

84% of users felt that the Mackie Onyx16 offered good value for money, considering the quality and features provided relative to its price point.

16% of users disagreed, feeling that the mixer was too expensive for what it offered, especially when compared to competitors with similar specs at a lower cost.

83% of users appreciated the aesthetics of the Mackie Onyx16, noting that its design was visually appealing and complemented their audio setups.

17% of users were not satisfied with the aesthetics, feeling that the mixer’s design was too basic or not modern enough to match the look of other audio equipment.

81% of users were satisfied with the input/output flexibility of the Mackie Onyx16, highlighting the variety of connections available for different audio sources and destinations.

19% of users found the input/output options to be lacking, particularly in terms of the number of available channels or specific type of connections needed for their setups.

74% of users were satisfied with the weight of the Mackie Onyx16, finding it manageable for transport and setup despite being a fully-featured mixer.

26% of users felt the mixer was too heavy, making it cumbersome for frequent transportation, especially for users who needed to move it between venues regularly.

87% of users expressed satisfaction with the longevity of the Mackie Onyx16, reporting that it maintained its performance and build quality over extended periods of use.

13% of users were concerned about the longevity of the mixer, citing issues such as component failures or degradation in audio quality over time, which led to their dissatisfaction.