PreSonus Eris 5BT vs Mackie CR5-XBT: Which Studio Monitor is Right for You?

PreSonus Eris 5BT vs Mackie CR5-XBT: Which Studio Monitor is Right for You?

The PreSonus Eris 5BT Studio Monitor Speaker and the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker are both popular choices among audio enthusiasts and professionals seeking high-quality sound reproduction. Both models are equipped with Bluetooth connectivity, making them versatile for a variety of audio sources, from traditional wired connections to modern wireless streaming.


The PreSonus Eris 5BT is known for its balanced frequency response and clear audio reproduction, which is crucial for those involved in music production and audio editing. It features a 5.25-inch woven composite low-frequency driver and a 1-inch silk-dome high-frequency driver, providing a smooth and detailed sound output. The Eris 5BT also includes acoustic tuning controls, allowing users to adjust the high and mid frequencies to tailor the sound to their environment.


On the other hand, the Mackie CR5-XBT offers a stylish design with a sleek finish, making it an attractive addition to any studio or home setup. This monitor speaker features a 5-inch polypropylene-coated woofer and a 0.75-inch ferrofluid-cooled silk-dome tweeter, delivering a robust and immersive sound experience. The CR5-XBT also includes a convenient front-panel headphone output and volume control, providing easy access and control over your audio playback.


Both models are designed to deliver high-fidelity audio, but they cater to slightly different preferences and needs. The PreSonus Eris 5BT is ideal for those who prioritize precision and customization in their sound, while the Mackie CR5-XBT appeals to users looking for style and ease of use without compromising on audio quality. Ultimately, the choice between these two monitors will depend on your specific requirements, whether it be for professional studio use or personal enjoyment.

In this section, we begin a detailed comparison between the PreSonus Eris 5BT and Mackie CR5-XBT studio monitor speakers. We will explore their specifications, highlighting both their strengths and weaknesses. This comprehensive analysis aims to provide you with the necessary insights to make an informed decision on which speaker best suits your audio requirements.

Comprehensive Specifications and Feature Analysis

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
  • Sound Quality

    85% of users praised the PreSonus Eris 5BT for its exceptional sound quality, noting the clarity and accuracy of the audio output. Many users found the sound to be well-balanced across different frequencies, making these speakers ideal for both professional studio use and casual listening. The presence of Bluetooth connectivity added to their appeal, offering flexibility in audio source options without compromising sound quality.

    15% of users were dissatisfied with the sound quality, citing issues such as lack of bass depth and occasional distortion at higher volumes. Some users mentioned that while the sound was clear, it did not meet their expectations for bass-heavy music genres, which led to a less immersive listening experience.

    85%
  • Build Quality

    80% of users appreciated the sturdy and professional build of the PreSonus Eris 5BT monitors. The materials used were commonly described as durable, with many users feeling confident in the longevity of their purchase. The modern aesthetic and robust construction were highlighted as significant positives that complemented their studio setups.

    20% of users expressed concerns about build quality, particularly focusing on the finish and materials used. Some users reported issues with the durability of the front panel and the knobs, noting that they felt less premium compared to other models in the market.

    80%
  • Value for Money

    78% of users considered the PreSonus Eris 5BT a great value for money, especially praising its affordability in relation to the high-quality audio output and the addition of Bluetooth functionality. Users frequently mentioned that these speakers offered features typically found in higher-priced models, making them a cost-effective choice for both beginners and experienced users.

    22% of users felt that the speakers did not offer sufficient value for money, especially when compared to competitors. Some users were disappointed by the lack of additional features, such as more advanced connectivity options or user-friendly controls, which they expected at this price point.

    78%
  • Ease of Use

    82% of users found the PreSonus Eris 5BT easy to set up and use. The Bluetooth pairing process was often described as straightforward, and the control knobs for volume and tuning were intuitive, allowing users to quickly adjust settings according to their preferences. This user-friendly design was particularly appreciated by those new to audio monitoring.

    18% of users encountered difficulties with setup and usage, particularly with the Bluetooth connectivity, which some found to be unreliable or difficult to pair with certain devices. Additionally, a few users mentioned that the lack of detailed instructions made the initial setup confusing.

    82%
  • Design and Aesthetics

    83% of users appreciated the sleek and modern design of the PreSonus Eris 5BT speakers. The compact size and minimalist aesthetic blended well with various studio and home environments, and users frequently remarked on the attractive appearance that complemented their workspace without being obtrusive.

    17% of users were less impressed with the design, describing it as too simplistic or not visually appealing enough for their taste. Some users felt that the design did not stand out compared to more stylish or unique options available on the market.

    83%
  • Bluetooth Connectivity

    79% of users were satisfied with the Bluetooth connectivity feature, which allowed for versatile audio source options without the need for cables. Users praised the convenience of wireless streaming and noted that the connection was generally stable across various devices.

    21% of users reported issues with Bluetooth connectivity, including frequent disconnections and difficulty in pairing with certain devices. Some users also experienced a noticeable delay in audio playback when using Bluetooth, which affected the overall usability of the speakers for real-time audio work.

    79%
  • Frequency Response

    81% of users were pleased with the frequency response of the PreSonus Eris 5BT, highlighting the wide range and accuracy as beneficial for mixing and mastering tasks. The ability to reproduce detailed sound across the spectrum was a key factor for many users in their positive evaluations.

    19% of users were dissatisfied with the frequency response, particularly noting a lack of low-end presence. For some, the speakers did not deliver the depth and richness in bass frequencies they were expecting, which was a drawback for genres like electronic or hip-hop.

    81%
  • Size and Portability

    84% of users were satisfied with the size and portability of the Eris 5BT speakers. The compact design made them easy to integrate into small spaces or transport between locations, which was a significant advantage for users with limited desktop space or those who frequently move their setup.

    16% of users felt that the speakers were not as portable as they had hoped, mentioning the weight as a limiting factor for easy transport. Some users also found that the smaller size compromised the sound output compared to larger alternatives.

    84%
  • Customer Support

    77% of users had a positive experience with PreSonus customer support, appreciating the prompt responses and helpful advice provided by the support team. Many users found that issues were resolved quickly, enhancing their overall satisfaction with the product.

    23% of users reported poor experiences with customer support, citing delayed responses and unsatisfactory solutions to their problems. Some users felt that the support team lacked the necessary product knowledge to effectively assist with more complex technical issues.

    77%
  • Durability

    79% of users were satisfied with the durability of the PreSonus Eris 5BT, noting that the speakers withstood regular use without significant wear. Many users expressed confidence in the longevity of the product based on its solid construction and reliable performance over time.

    21% of users experienced issues with durability, reporting problems such as deteriorating sound quality and physical wear after a short period of use. Some users mentioned specific components, like the speaker cones or connectors, as areas that showed signs of early degradation.

    79%
  • Bass Performance

    76% of users were content with the bass performance, particularly praising the tightness and precision of the low-end reproduction. These users felt that the bass was sufficient for most applications, including music production and general listening.

    24% of users were dissatisfied with the bass performance, feeling that it lacked the impact and fullness they desired. For some, the bass was too subdued, failing to deliver the punch necessary for bass-heavy tracks, which limited their enjoyment and usability for certain types of music.

    76%
  • High Frequency Clarity

    82% of users appreciated the clarity in the high frequencies, which allowed for detailed and crisp audio reproduction. Users found this particularly beneficial for tasks such as mixing and editing, where precision is crucial.

    18% of users were not satisfied with the high-frequency clarity, describing it as harsh or overly bright in certain situations. This led to fatigue during extended listening sessions for some users, impacting their overall experience.

    82%
  • Midrange Accuracy

    83% of users were pleased with the midrange accuracy, noting that vocals and instruments were rendered clearly and naturally. This made the speakers suitable for a variety of uses, from professional audio work to home entertainment.

    17% of users found the midrange to be lacking in detail or warmth, which affected the overall tonal balance. For some, this resulted in a less engaging listening experience, particularly for music genres that rely heavily on midrange presence.

    83%
  • Versatility

    80% of users valued the versatility of the PreSonus Eris 5BT, highlighting their performance across different audio applications. Whether used for gaming, music production, or casual listening, users found these monitors adaptable and effective in various settings.

    20% of users felt the speakers lacked versatility, noting limitations in handling certain audio tasks. Some users found that while the speakers performed well in specific scenarios, they did not excel across all applications, leading to a need for additional equipment.

    80%
  • Input Options

    78% of users were satisfied with the range of input options available, finding them sufficient for connecting multiple audio sources. The combination of balanced and unbalanced inputs, along with Bluetooth, provided flexibility in how the speakers could be used.

    22% of users were dissatisfied with the input options, wishing for more advanced connectivity features such as digital inputs. Some users found the available options limiting, particularly when integrating the speakers into more complex audio setups.

    78%
  • Price

    75% of users found the price of the PreSonus Eris 5BT to be fair, considering the features and sound quality offered. Many users felt that the speakers provided a good balance of cost and performance, making them an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers.

    25% of users were unhappy with the pricing, feeling that the speakers were overpriced for the quality and features provided. Some users compared them unfavorably to cheaper alternatives that they felt offered similar or better performance.

    75%
  • Warranty

    81% of users appreciated the warranty provided with the PreSonus Eris 5BT, mentioning the peace of mind it offered in case of defects or issues. The coverage was seen as a positive aspect that added value to the purchase.

    19% of users were dissatisfied with the warranty, citing limitations and exclusions that reduced its effectiveness. Some users experienced difficulties in claiming warranty support, which led to frustration and dissatisfaction.

    81%
  • Adjustability

    80% of users were satisfied with the adjustability features of the speakers, such as the tuning controls that allowed for personalized sound profiles. This flexibility was appreciated by users who needed to tailor the sound to specific room acoustics or personal preferences.

    20% of users were not satisfied with the level of adjustability, wishing for more advanced or precise control options. Some users felt that the existing controls did not allow for sufficient customization, limiting their ability to optimize the sound for their environment.

    80%
  • Noise Floor

    82% of users were pleased with the low noise floor of the PreSonus Eris 5BT, noting minimal background noise during playback. This was especially important for users in professional settings, where noise interference can compromise audio quality.

    18% of users encountered issues with noise, reporting a noticeable hiss or hum when the speakers were in use. This was particularly problematic for users sensitive to background noise, affecting their perception of the overall quality.

    82%
  • Power Handling

    81% of users were satisfied with the power handling capabilities, indicating that the speakers performed well at various volume levels without distortion. Users felt confident pushing the speakers to higher volumes when needed, appreciating the consistent performance.

    19% of users experienced issues with power handling, noting distortion or clipping at higher volumes. This limited the speakers' usability in larger spaces or louder environments, where more power was needed to maintain audio quality.

    81%
  • Setup Instructions

    79% of users were satisfied with the setup instructions provided, finding them clear and easy to follow. Most users were able to get their speakers up and running quickly, thanks to the straightforward guidance included with the product.

    21% of users found the setup instructions lacking, describing them as insufficiently detailed or difficult to understand. Some users had to rely on external resources or support to complete the setup process, which detracted from their initial experience.

    79%
  • Sound Quality

    85% of users praised the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker for its exceptional sound quality, noting the clarity and detail in the audio output. Users appreciated the balanced sound profile that suits a variety of music genres and the accurate representation of both highs and lows, which is crucial for studio monitoring. The bass response was reported to be precise without being overwhelming, making it a preferred choice for both casual listeners and professional audio engineers.

    15% of users were dissatisfied with the sound quality, reporting issues with the mid-range frequencies that seemed to get lost in the mix. Some users mentioned that the speakers required additional equalization to achieve their desired sound profile, which was inconvenient for those expecting a plug-and-play solution. A few also noted that at higher volumes, the sound could become distorted, which was disappointing for those expecting consistent performance across all volume levels.

    85%
  • Build Quality

    80% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, commending its sturdy construction and durable materials. They highlighted the sleek design and the professional aesthetic that fits well in both studio and home settings. The weight and feel of the speakers were also mentioned as evidence of a high-quality product, which gave users confidence in their longevity.

    20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the build quality, citing issues such as the materials feeling somewhat cheap and concerns over long-term durability. A few users reported that the speaker's finish was prone to scratches and marks, detracting from the overall appearance. Additionally, some experienced problems with the connectivity features, which they attributed to poor build quality.

    80%
  • Purchase Value

    75% of users felt that the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker offered good value for money, especially considering the sound quality and features like Bluetooth connectivity. They appreciated the competitive pricing compared to other studio monitors in the same category, making it an attractive option for those on a budget without sacrificing much in terms of performance.

    25% of users were not satisfied with the purchase value, believing that the speakers did not offer enough features or performance to justify the price. Some mentioned that similar products from other brands offered better sound quality or additional features for the same price point, making the Mackie CR5-XBT seem less appealing in comparison.

    75%
  • Ease of Use

    90% of users found the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker very easy to use, highlighting the straightforward setup process and intuitive controls. The inclusion of Bluetooth connectivity was seen as a major convenience, allowing users to easily pair their devices without dealing with cumbersome wiring. Users appreciated the simplicity of the user interface, which did not require a steep learning curve.

    10% of users reported dissatisfaction with the ease of use, mainly due to initial setup issues or connectivity problems. A small number of users found the Bluetooth pairing process to be inconsistent, which occasionally required multiple attempts to connect their devices. Others mentioned that the lack of advanced controls or customization options limited their ability to fine-tune the speakers to their preference.

    90%
  • Aesthetic Design

    88% of users were impressed with the aesthetic design of the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, appreciating its modern and professional look. The sleek and minimalist design was noted as a key factor in choosing these speakers, as they blend well with various room decors and studio setups. Users also liked the compact size, which made them suitable for small spaces without compromising on style.

    12% of users were not satisfied with the aesthetic design, feeling that the design was somewhat generic and lacked any standout features. Some users desired more color options or customizable elements to better match their personal style or existing equipment. A few also mentioned that the design did not match the premium feel they were expecting, given the price point.

    88%
  • Connectivity Options

    82% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options available on the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker. The inclusion of Bluetooth was especially appreciated for its convenience, allowing users to connect wirelessly without sacrificing quality. The availability of multiple input options, such as RCA and TRS, was also highlighted as a benefit, providing flexibility for various audio sources.

    18% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the connectivity options, primarily due to occasional Bluetooth connectivity issues. Some users experienced lag or dropouts during wireless playback, which was frustrating during critical listening sessions. Additionally, a few users wished for more advanced connectivity options, such as USB or optical inputs, which would enhance the speaker's versatility.

    82%
  • Volume Control

    87% of users were pleased with the volume control on the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, noting its smooth operation and precise adjustment capabilities. The volume knob's placement and responsiveness were appreciated, allowing users to easily fine-tune the audio levels to their preference. Users also valued the consistency of the volume control, which maintained sound quality across different levels.

    13% of users were dissatisfied with the volume control, citing difficulty in achieving very low or very high volumes. A small number of users found the volume increments to be too large, making it challenging to adjust the sound to the desired level without overstepping. Some also mentioned that the volume control felt flimsy or not as durable as they expected, leading to concerns about its longevity.

    87%
  • Bass Response

    78% of users were satisfied with the bass response of the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, describing it as punchy and well-defined. The bass was reported to be accurate and not overly exaggerated, making it suitable for critical listening and mixing tasks. Users appreciated the speaker's ability to deliver a solid low-end presence without overshadowing other frequencies.

    22% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the bass response, feeling that it was lacking in depth and power. Some users mentioned that the bass could be too subtle, especially for genres that require a strong low-end presence. Others noted that the bass performance varied depending on the room size and acoustics, leading to inconsistent experiences across different environments.

    78%
  • High Frequency Response

    83% of users were satisfied with the high frequency response of the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, praising its clarity and detail. The highs were described as crisp and articulate, enhancing the listening experience for detailed audio work such as mixing and mastering. Users valued the accuracy of the high frequencies, which allowed them to hear subtle nuances in their music.

    17% of users were dissatisfied with the high frequency response, citing issues such as harshness or sibilance at higher volumes. Some users felt that the highs could become fatiguing over extended listening periods, which was a drawback for those who work in studios for long hours. Others mentioned that the high frequencies lacked the sparkle or brilliance they expected from a premium studio monitor.

    83%
  • Midrange Clarity

    79% of users were satisfied with the midrange clarity of the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, noting that vocals and instruments were well-represented and clear. The midrange frequencies were described as natural and balanced, providing a true-to-life audio experience that is crucial for accurate monitoring. Users appreciated the speaker's ability to handle complex mixes without muddling the midrange.

    21% of users were not satisfied with the midrange clarity, feeling that it was somewhat recessed or lacking presence. Some users reported that certain instruments, particularly guitars and vocals, did not stand out as much as they should in the mix. Others mentioned that the midrange could become congested at higher volumes, making it difficult to distinguish individual elements in the audio.

    79%
  • Durability

    81% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, stating that it withstood regular use without any significant issues. The materials and construction were praised for their robustness, giving users confidence in the speaker's ability to endure the rigors of a studio environment. Some users also noted that the speaker's design seemed to protect it well from accidental bumps or knocks.

    19% of users were dissatisfied with the durability, reporting problems such as cosmetic damage or component failures after a short period of use. Some users felt that certain parts, like the control knobs or input connectors, were prone to wear and tear more quickly than expected. Others mentioned that the speaker's housing did not feel as solid as they anticipated, raising concerns about its long-term resilience.

    81%
  • Bluetooth Connectivity

    84% of users were pleased with the Bluetooth connectivity of the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, highlighting the ease and convenience of wireless streaming. Users appreciated the reliable connection and the ability to quickly pair with their devices without noticeable audio quality loss. The addition of Bluetooth was seen as a valuable feature for those looking to minimize cable clutter in their setup.

    16% of users experienced dissatisfaction with the Bluetooth connectivity, encountering issues such as intermittent disconnections or pairing difficulties. Some users noted that the Bluetooth range was limited, which restricted movement around the room while maintaining a stable connection. Others mentioned that the audio quality over Bluetooth did not match their expectations compared to wired connections.

    84%
  • Versatility

    86% of users found the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker to be highly versatile, suitable for a range of audio applications from casual listening to professional mixing. The combination of different input options and Bluetooth connectivity allowed users to use the speakers in various settings, from home studios to desktop setups. Users valued the speaker's adaptability, which made it a practical choice for different audio needs.

    14% of users felt that the speaker's versatility was limited, primarily due to the lack of advanced features or customization options. Some users desired more control over the sound profile, such as built-in EQ settings or DSP features, which would enhance its adaptability to different environments. Others mentioned that while the speaker performed well in most scenarios, it did not excel in any specific area, making it less appealing for specialized tasks.

    86%
  • Size and Weight

    89% of users were satisfied with the size and weight of the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, appreciating its compact design and portability. The size was noted as ideal for small to medium-sized spaces, and users found the speakers easy to position without dominating their desk or studio space. The manageable weight made them easy to transport for users who needed a mobile monitoring solution.

    11% of users were not satisfied with the size and weight, feeling that the speakers were either too large for their intended space or too lightweight, which could affect stability. Some users desired a smaller footprint for more cramped environments, while others worried that the lightweight design could lead to accidental tipping or movement if not securely positioned.

    89%
  • Customer Support

    76% of users reported positive experiences with Mackie's customer support, noting their responsiveness and helpfulness in resolving issues. Users appreciated the availability of support representatives who were knowledgeable about the product and able to offer effective solutions or guidance when needed. The overall experience with customer support was rated as satisfactory by most users.

    24% of users expressed dissatisfaction with customer support, reporting delays in response times or unsatisfactory resolutions to their problems. Some users mentioned that they found it difficult to reach a representative or experienced long wait times, which was frustrating when dealing with urgent issues. Others felt that the support provided was not thorough enough, leaving them with unresolved questions or concerns.

    76%
  • Packaging

    82% of users were satisfied with the packaging of the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, commending its secure and protective design. The speakers were reported to arrive well-protected, with users appreciating the attention to detail in ensuring that the product was free from damage during transit. The packaging was also seen as easy to open and recycle, adding to the overall positive experience.

    18% of users were dissatisfied with the packaging, noting instances of insufficient protection that led to minor damages upon arrival. Some users felt that the packaging materials were flimsy or not as robust as expected for a product of this nature. Others mentioned that the lack of clear instructions or labeling made the unboxing process slightly confusing or inconvenient.

    82%
  • User Manual

    78% of users found the user manual helpful and informative, providing clear instructions for setup and operation. Users appreciated the inclusion of detailed diagrams and troubleshooting tips, which made the initial setup straightforward even for those with limited technical experience. The manual was seen as a valuable resource for maximizing the speaker's potential.

    22% of users were dissatisfied with the user manual, finding it lacking in depth or clarity. Some users reported that the manual did not cover all features or scenarios, leaving them with unanswered questions about certain functionalities. Others mentioned that the language used was too technical or poorly translated, making it difficult to fully understand the instructions.

    78%
  • Price Competitiveness

    74% of users felt that the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker was competitively priced, offering a good balance between cost and performance. Users appreciated the value provided by the speaker's features and sound quality, especially when compared to other options in the same price range. The affordability was a key factor for those seeking quality studio monitors without exceeding their budget.

    26% of users were not satisfied with the price competitiveness, believing that the speakers were overpriced given the features and performance offered. Some users felt that there were better options available at a similar price point, making the Mackie CR5-XBT less appealing. Others mentioned that the cost did not align with their expectations for premium studio monitors, especially in terms of build quality or advanced features.

    74%
  • Warranty

    80% of users were satisfied with the warranty offered for the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, appreciating the peace of mind provided by the coverage. Users felt reassured by the manufacturer's commitment to stand behind their product, which added confidence in their purchase decision. The warranty process was also reported to be straightforward and hassle-free for most users.

    20% of users were dissatisfied with the warranty, citing issues such as limited coverage or difficulty in claiming repairs or replacements. Some users felt that the warranty period was too short, especially given the price of the speakers. Others experienced challenges in navigating the warranty claim process, which they found to be bureaucratic or time-consuming.

    80%
  • Brand Reputation

    85% of users were satisfied with the Mackie brand, recognizing its reputation for producing reliable and high-quality audio equipment. Users expressed trust in the brand's expertise and history in the industry, which influenced their decision to purchase the CR5-XBT Studio Monitors. The positive brand reputation added an element of assurance regarding product performance and customer service.

    15% of users were not satisfied with the brand reputation, possibly due to past experiences with other Mackie products that did not meet their expectations. Some users felt that the brand's reputation was overstated, as their experience with the CR5-XBT did not align with the high standards often associated with Mackie. Others mentioned that they encountered mixed reviews from other sources, leading to uncertainty about the brand's overall reliability.

    85%
Show More
Pros:
  • Bluetooth connectivity for wireless streaming.
  • High-quality sound with accurate frequency response.
  • Compact design suitable for small spaces.
  • Front-firing bass port provides a more consistent response.
  • Adjustable acoustic tuning controls for room optimization.
  • Bluetooth connectivity allows for wireless audio streaming.
  • 5-inch woofer provides a balanced bass response suitable for various music styles.
  • Compact design fits well in small studio spaces.
  • Front-facing headphone jack offers easy access for private listening.
  • High-quality sound reproduction ideal for home studios and content creators.
Cons:
  • Limited low-end frequency response compared to larger monitors.
  • Bluetooth functionality may introduce slight latency.
  • Not ideal for large studio environments due to size.
  • Power output may not be sufficient for very loud playback.
  • Limited to small and mid-sized rooms due to their size.
  • May not deliver enough low-end bass for professional audio mixing.
  • Some users might prefer more advanced connectivity options beyond Bluetooth.
  • Not suitable for large-scale professional studio environments.
  • Price point might be high for beginners looking for entry-level monitors.
Key Specs
Monitor Type & Configuration
Active 2-Way Active 2-Way
Total Power Output
50 W per Monitor 40 W Peak per Monitor
Tweeter
1x 1" / 25.4 mm Silk Dome 1x 0.75" / 19.1 mm Silk Dome
Woofer
1x 5.25" / 13.3 cm Cone
1x 5" / 12.7 cm Polypropylene Cone
Audio I/O
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Input
1x Stereo 2RCA Unbalanced Input
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Input
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output
1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Output
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line Input
1x Stereo 2RCA Unbalanced Line Input
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Aux Input
2x Push Terminal Unbalanced Passive Speaker Output
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output
Digital Audio I/O
Network I/O
Wireless
Bluetooth  Bluetooth 

When comparing the PreSonus Eris 5BT and the Mackie CR5-XBT studio monitor speakers, both models are active 2-way speakers designed for studio monitoring. However, the PreSonus Eris 5BT offers a slightly higher total power output of 50 W per monitor, compared to the Mackie's 40 W peak per monitor. This difference may contribute to the PreSonus model providing a more robust sound performance, especially in larger spaces.Show More


In terms of driver specifications, the PreSonus Eris 5BT features a 1x 1" silk dome tweeter and a 5.25" cone woofer, while the Mackie CR5-XBT comes with a 1x 0.75" silk dome tweeter and a 5" polypropylene cone woofer. The larger tweeter on the Eris may enhance its high-frequency response, providing a clearer sound signature for critical listening and mixing applications.


Both speakers have a similar range of audio inputs, including 1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced inputs and 1/8" TRS aux inputs. The PreSonus model includes an additional 1/4" TS unbalanced output, which may offer more flexibility for connecting to other audio equipment. Both models are equipped with Bluetooth capabilities, allowing for wireless audio streaming, making them convenient for modern setups.


In summary, the PreSonus Eris 5BT stands out with its higher power output and slightly larger tweeter, potentially providing a better overall audio experience. The Mackie CR5-XBT, while slightly lower in power and with a smaller tweeter, still offers solid performance and flexibility with its input options and Bluetooth connectivity. Ultimately, the choice between the two may depend on specific audio needs and personal preferences.

General
Number of Included Monitors
Stereo Pair Stereo Pair
Enclosure
Bass-Reflex/Ported, Shielded Bass-Reflex/Ported
Total Power Output
50 W per Monitor 40 W Peak per Monitor

The PreSonus Eris 5BT Studio Monitor Speaker and the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker both come as a stereo pair, making them suitable for a variety of audio monitoring needs. They feature a bass-reflex/ported enclosure, which enhances low-frequency response and overall sound quality. However, the Eris 5BT offers a total power output of 50 W per monitor, delivering a bit more power than the CR5-XBT, which has a 40 W peak power output per monitor.Show More


In terms of design, both speakers prioritize portability and functionality, with the PreSonus model being shielded for additional protection against interference. This is particularly beneficial for studio environments where multiple electronic devices are present. The Mackie CR5-XBT, while not shielded, still provides a robust build quality and is designed to deliver clear and accurate sound.


In conclusion, while both the PreSonus Eris 5BT and the Mackie CR5-XBT are excellent choices for studio monitoring, the Eris 5BT stands out with its higher power output and shielding features, making it a strong contender for those seeking superior performance in a compact package. The Mackie CR5-XBT offers a reliable alternative, especially for users who prioritize design and functionality within a slightly lower power range.

Drivers per Monitor
Tweeter
1x 1" / 25.4 mm Silk Dome 1x 0.75" / 19.1 mm Silk Dome
Woofer
1x 5.25" / 13.3 cm Cone
1x 5" / 12.7 cm Polypropylene Cone
Amplifiers
Full-Range: 2 x 50 W Class-D Full-Range: 80 W Peak Class-D

The PreSonus Eris 5BT Studio Monitor Speaker features a 1-inch silk dome tweeter and a 5.25-inch cone woofer, delivering a balanced and accurate sound profile. With a total amplification of 100 W Class-D (2 x 50 W), it provides ample power for both home studios and professional environments, ensuring that audio playback is clear and dynamic across a range of frequencies.Show More


In contrast, the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker is equipped with a smaller 0.75-inch silk dome tweeter and a 5-inch polypropylene cone woofer. While it offers a peak power of 80 W, it utilizes a single Class-D amplifier. This design allows for decent sound quality, but the lower specifications may limit its performance compared to the Eris 5BT in terms of volume and overall sound clarity.


The overall size of the woofers indicates that the PreSonus Eris 5BT is likely to produce deeper bass response and a fuller sound, making it a better choice for those who prioritize low-end frequencies. Meanwhile, the Mackie CR5-XBT could be more suitable for users who prefer a slightly more compact monitor with decent performance and a lower price point, but it may not match the Eris 5BT in terms of audio fidelity and output power.

Performance
Maximum Sound Pressure Level (SPL)
110 dB (Peak) 105 dB

The PreSonus Eris 5BT Studio Monitor Speaker boasts a frequency response of 55 Hz to 20 kHz, providing a solid range for detailed audio reproduction. It can achieve a maximum sound pressure level (SPL) of 110 dB (Peak), making it suitable for various listening environments, especially where louder volumes are necessary. Additionally, the speaker comes equipped with multiple protection features, including Driver Protection, Fuse, Output Current Limiting, Subsonic Filter, and Thermal Limiting, ensuring durability and safety during operation.Show More


In comparison, the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker offers a frequency range of 50 Hz to 20 kHz (-10 dB) and 69 Hz to 20 kHz (-3 dB), which provides a slightly broader low-end response when compared to the PreSonus model. The maximum SPL for the Mackie CR5-XBT is 105 dB, which, while still impressive, is slightly lower than that of the Eris 5BT. This may impact performance in louder settings or larger spaces.


Overall, while both studio monitors deliver quality sound, the PreSonus Eris 5BT offers a higher SPL and a comprehensive set of protection features, making it a more robust option for demanding audio applications. Conversely, the Mackie CR5-XBT stands out with its lower frequency response, appealing to those who prioritize deep bass in their listening experience.

Signal Processing
EQ
1x HF Shelf
1x LF Shelf
Filters
Phase Adjustment

The PreSonus Eris 5BT Studio Monitor Speaker features an EQ with 1x HF Shelf and 1x LF Shelf, allowing users to tailor the sound to their specific preferences. This capability is particularly beneficial for those who want to adjust the high and low frequencies to better suit their listening environment or personal taste. In contrast, the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker does not offer any form of EQ adjustment, which may limit its versatility in sound customization.Show More


Both speakers share a commonality in that they lack filters and phase adjustment capabilities. However, the Mackie CR5-XBT does specify a Crossover Frequency of 3 kHz, which helps manage the distribution of frequencies between the woofer and tweeter. This is not a feature found in the PreSonus Eris 5BT, which does not specify a crossover frequency, potentially affecting how the speaker handles different audio ranges.


In summary, the PreSonus Eris 5BT offers more flexibility with its EQ options, making it suitable for users looking to fine-tune their audio experience. On the other hand, the Mackie CR5-XBT provides a designated crossover frequency, which may appeal to those who prioritize clearer separation of audio frequencies but without the ability to adjust EQ settings. Ultimately, the choice between these two speakers will depend on the user’s specific needs and preferences in sound management.

Connectivity
Audio I/O
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Input
1x Stereo 2RCA Unbalanced Input
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Input
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output
1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Output
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line Input
1x Stereo 2RCA Unbalanced Line Input
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Aux Input
2x Push Terminal Unbalanced Passive Speaker Output
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output
Digital Audio I/O
Network I/O
USB
Wireless
Bluetooth  Bluetooth 

When comparing the PreSonus Eris 5BT and Mackie CR5-XBT studio monitor speakers, both models offer a variety of audio input options. The PreSonus Eris 5BT features 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Inputs, 1x Stereo 2RCA Unbalanced Input, and 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Input, complemented by a 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output and a 1/4" TS Unbalanced Output. In contrast, the Mackie CR5-XBT also includes 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line Inputs, 1x Stereo 2RCA Unbalanced Line Input, and 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Aux Input, along with a 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output and 2x Push Terminal Unbalanced Passive Speaker Outputs.Show More


Both speakers do not include Digital Audio I/O, Network I/O, or USB connectivity options. However, they both support Bluetooth wireless connectivity, allowing for convenient streaming from various devices. The absence of mobile app compatibility for both models indicates a straightforward approach to connectivity without the need for additional software.


In summary, while the PreSonus Eris 5BT and Mackie CR5-XBT studio monitor speakers share several similarities in terms of audio input options and connectivity features, they cater to slightly different user needs with their respective configurations. The choice between the two may ultimately depend on specific preferences regarding connectivity and output options.

Physical
Color
Black Black
Monitor Orientation
Vertical Vertical
Enclosure Material
MDF MDF
Mounting Points
Dimensions (W x H x D)
7 x 10.2 x 7.9" / 177.8 x 259.1 x 200.7 mm (Each) 6.9 x 10.2 x 9.3" / 17.5 x 25.9 x 23.6 cm (Each)
Weight
2.8 lb / 1.3 kg (Each) 14.9 lb / 6.8 kg (Pair)

The PreSonus Eris 5BT Studio Monitor Speaker and the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker are both sleek, black vertical monitors crafted from MDF, making them suitable for various studio environments. However, they differ in size and weight. The Eris 5BT measures 7 x 10.2 x 7.9 inches and weighs only 2.8 lb per speaker, while the CR5-XBT is slightly more substantial, with dimensions of 6.9 x 10.2 x 9.3 inches and a combined weight of 14.9 lb for the pair.Show More


Both models do not feature mounting points, which may influence installation options for users seeking versatility. The operating conditions for the Mackie CR5-XBT range from 32 to 104°F, providing a broader environmental tolerance compared to the Eris 5BT. Overall, while both studio monitors offer quality in a compact design, their weight and operating specifications cater to different user preferences and studio setups.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
16.75 lb 17.02 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
19.2 x 13.9 x 11.4" 18.5 x 12.9 x 11.3"

The PreSonus Eris 5BT Studio Monitor Speaker has a package weight of 16.75 lb and its dimensions are 19.2 x 13.9 x 11.4 inches. This makes it relatively lightweight and easy to transport, while also providing a compact size that can fit in various studio setups.Show More


In comparison, the Mackie CR5-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker comes in slightly heavier at 17.02 lb, with box dimensions of 18.5 x 12.9 x 11.3 inches. Although the weight difference is minimal, the size is slightly more compact in width but shorter in height than the Eris 5BT, which may affect placement options depending on the studio environment.


Both speakers are designed for studio use, but the PreSonus Eris 5BT offers a broader box dimension, allowing for potentially larger drivers or a different acoustic design. On the other hand, the Mackie CR5-XBT's dimensions may cater better to specific setups where space is a concern. Ultimately, the choice between these two monitors will depend on individual preferences regarding weight, size, and the specific acoustic needs of the user.

Customer Images
Videos