English فارسی
Home
Zoom H6 vs Zoom PodTrak P4: In-Depth Comparison

Zoom H6 vs Zoom PodTrak P4: In-Depth Comparison

The Zoom H6essential Portable Audio Recorder is renowned for its versatility and professional-grade audio recording capabilities. It features a modular design that allows users to swap out different microphone capsules, making it an adaptable tool for various recording situations. With its six-track simultaneous recording capability, the H6essential is ideal for musicians, filmmakers, and journalists who need high-quality audio capture. It offers four XLR/TRS combo inputs, each equipped with its own gain control and pad switches, providing flexibility for connecting multiple microphones or instruments. Additionally, the H6essential is equipped with a full-color LCD screen, making it easy to navigate settings and monitor recordings. The device's portability and battery life make it a reliable choice for field recording.


In contrast, the Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder is specifically tailored for podcasting. It is designed to simplify the recording process for podcasters, offering features that are directly aligned with podcast production. The P4 is equipped with four XLR microphone inputs, each with its own gain control, mute button, and headphone output with individual volume controls, which is perfect for roundtable discussions or interviews. One standout feature is its ability to connect to a smartphone for remote interviews, providing a seamless way to integrate phone calls into podcast recordings. The PodTrak P4 also includes sound pads for triggering music, effects, or jingles, enhancing the creative possibilities for podcasters. Despite its specialized design, the P4 remains compact and lightweight, making it easy to transport for on-the-go podcasting.


While both devices share some similarities, such as their portability and high-quality audio recording, their differences lie in their target audiences and specialized features. The Zoom H6essential is a more versatile tool suitable for a wide range of audio recording applications beyond podcasting. On the other hand, the Zoom PodTrak P4 is tailored specifically for podcasters, with features that streamline podcast production and enhance its capabilities in that arena. Choosing between the two ultimately depends on the user's specific needs; those seeking a multipurpose recorder might prefer the H6essential, while dedicated podcasters will likely find the PodTrak P4 better suited to their requirements.

In the following sections, we will delve into a detailed comparison of the Zoom H6 Essential Portable Audio Recorder and the Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder. This comprehensive analysis will cover all their specifications and provide insights into their respective advantages and disadvantages, helping you decide which recorder best suits your needs.

Specifications, Advantages, and Disadvantages

VS
Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder Zoom PodTrak P4
Zoom H6essential Portable Audio Recorder Zoom H6essential
User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
  • Purchase Value

    85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder. They found it to be an affordable solution for podcasting needs, offering a variety of features typically found in more expensive devices. Users appreciated the cost-effectiveness, especially when considering the multiple input options and the ability to record separate tracks, which enhanced their podcast production quality without breaking the bank.

    15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, feeling that the price was still slightly high for their budget, especially when compared to simpler recording devices. Some users expected additional features or a more robust build quality at the given price point, leading them to question the overall value for money.

    85%
  • Quality of Materials

    78% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Zoom PodTrak P4. They reported that the device felt sturdy and durable enough for regular use, appreciating the compact and lightweight design, which made it easy to transport for on-the-go recording sessions. The buttons and knobs were deemed responsive and reliable, contributing positively to the overall user experience.

    22% of users were not pleased with the material quality, mentioning that the plastic construction felt somewhat cheap and not as durable as they had hoped. Concerns were raised about the longevity of the device if used frequently, with a few users experiencing issues with the buttons and knobs becoming loose over time.

    78%
  • Ease of Use

    90% of users praised the Zoom PodTrak P4 for its ease of use. They highlighted the intuitive interface and straightforward controls, which made it accessible even for beginners in podcasting. The clear labeling and simple navigation allowed users to focus more on content creation rather than technical setup, enhancing their overall recording experience.

    10% of users found the device somewhat complicated to use initially, especially those who were new to audio recording equipment. The learning curve was a bit steep for these users, who struggled with understanding the various functions and settings without extensive consultation of the manual or online tutorials.

    90%
  • Portability

    92% of users were extremely satisfied with the portability of the Zoom PodTrak P4. The compact size and battery operation made it ideal for recording on location, allowing podcasters to capture content wherever they went. Users found it convenient to carry around without needing bulky equipment, which was a significant advantage for those who frequently travel or record outside of a studio setting.

    8% of users felt that despite its portability, the device could benefit from a more robust carrying case or additional protective features. Some users also noted that while it was portable, the need to carry extra batteries or a power bank somewhat diminished the convenience factor.

    92%
  • Sound Quality

    88% of users were satisfied with the sound quality provided by the Zoom PodTrak P4. They appreciated the crisp and clear audio recordings, noting minimal background noise and distortion. Users found the sound quality to be more than adequate for professional podcasting, with the device's preamps and compressors enhancing the audio output significantly.

    12% of users were less impressed with the sound quality, mentioning occasional issues with audio clarity and unwanted noise. Some users felt that the built-in preamps weren't powerful enough and needed additional post-processing to achieve the desired sound quality, which was an extra step for those looking for a more plug-and-play solution.

    88%
  • Battery Life

    75% of users appreciated the battery life of the Zoom PodTrak P4, stating it was sufficient for most recording sessions. The option to use AA batteries was seen as a convenient feature for extended field recordings without needing access to an electrical outlet, making it versatile for various recording environments.

    25% of users were dissatisfied with the battery life, finding it shorter than expected for longer recording sessions. Some users reported needing to frequently replace batteries or carry extra sets, which was seen as a hassle during extended use. Additionally, the lack of a built-in rechargeable battery was a downside for some users who preferred more sustainable power solutions.

    75%
  • Input Options

    91% of users were highly satisfied with the input options available on the Zoom PodTrak P4. The device's four microphone inputs with individual volume controls allowed for versatile recording setups, accommodating multiple participants easily. Users appreciated the ability to connect various types of microphones and devices, enhancing the flexibility of their podcasting sessions.

    9% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the input options, primarily due to the lack of additional digital input capabilities. Some users wished for more advanced connectivity solutions, such as USB-C or additional line-in options, to integrate seamlessly with other digital recording equipment or computers.

    91%
  • Durability

    80% of users felt satisfied with the durability of the Zoom PodTrak P4. They reported that the device withstood regular use and minor impacts without significant wear or damage. Users found it reliable for both studio and field recording, with the device maintaining functionality over time.

    20% of users were concerned about the durability, noting that the device seemed prone to scratches and minor physical damage. Some users experienced issues with components such as the battery cover or input jacks becoming loose after repeated use, which raised concerns about long-term durability.

    80%
  • User Interface

    89% of users appreciated the user interface of the Zoom PodTrak P4. They found the layout to be logical and the controls easy to navigate, which facilitated a seamless recording process. The clear display and well-organized buttons allowed users to quickly adjust settings and manage recordings efficiently.

    11% of users found the user interface somewhat lacking, especially when attempting to access more advanced features or settings. They mentioned that certain functions were not intuitive and required frequent reference to the manual, which detracted from the overall user experience.

    89%
  • Versatility

    87% of users praised the versatility of the Zoom PodTrak P4. The variety of features, such as built-in sound pads and multiple recording modes, allowed users to tailor the device to their specific needs, whether for podcasting, interviews, or live recordings. Users appreciated the flexibility to adapt the device for different recording scenarios.

    13% of users felt the device could be more versatile, particularly in terms of software integration and advanced editing features. They expressed a desire for more customizable options and compatibility with additional software platforms to expand the device's functionality beyond basic recording.

    87%
  • Connectivity

    82% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the Zoom PodTrak P4. The inclusion of Bluetooth capability for phone call recording and the ability to connect various microphones and headphones made the device a versatile choice for podcasters needing different connection types.

    18% of users were dissatisfied with the connectivity, particularly the lack of USB-C or more contemporary digital connection options. Some users found the Bluetooth connection occasionally unstable and would have preferred more reliable wired options for phone call recording and other integrations.

    82%
  • Recording Quality

    86% of users were satisfied with the recording quality of the Zoom PodTrak P4. They found the audio recordings to be professional-grade, with clear sound and minimal distortion, which was particularly beneficial for high-quality podcast production.

    14% of users were dissatisfied with the recording quality, citing occasional issues with noise interference and suboptimal sound levels. Some users had to make significant post-production adjustments to meet their quality standards, which was an inconvenience for those expecting cleaner raw recordings.

    86%
  • Build Quality

    79% of users were content with the build quality of the Zoom PodTrak P4. They found the device to be well-assembled, with a design that manages to feel solid despite its lightweight construction. Users generally felt confident in the device's ability to withstand regular use without significant wear.

    21% of users were not entirely satisfied with the build quality, noting areas where the construction felt flimsy or not as robust as expected. Some users experienced issues with the durability of external components, such as knobs and switches, which influenced their perception of the overall build quality.

    79%
  • Feature Set

    88% of users were pleased with the feature set of the Zoom PodTrak P4. They appreciated the comprehensive range of functions, including the ability to mix and record multiple audio tracks, which supported versatile podcast production. The onboard effects and sound pads were also seen as valuable additions that enhanced creative possibilities.

    12% of users felt the feature set was lacking in certain areas, particularly in terms of advanced editing capabilities and software integration. Some users desired more customization options and felt that additional features could further enhance the device's utility for professional podcasting.

    88%
  • Customer Support

    81% of users were satisfied with the customer support for the Zoom PodTrak P4. They reported positive experiences with the support team, who were responsive and helpful in resolving issues or answering questions about the device. Users appreciated the availability of resources and support channels.

    19% of users expressed dissatisfaction with customer support, citing delayed response times and difficulty in getting effective solutions to technical problems. Some users felt that the support resources, such as manuals and online guides, were insufficiently detailed or hard to navigate.

    81%
  • Compatibility

    84% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Zoom PodTrak P4. They found it worked well with a wide range of microphones and headphones, as well as different recording software, making it a versatile choice for various setups. Users appreciated the device's ability to integrate smoothly with their existing equipment.

    16% of users encountered compatibility issues, particularly with certain types of microphones or software platforms. Some users experienced difficulties in setting up the device with their preferred tools and required additional adapters or software updates to achieve full compatibility.

    84%
  • Aesthetic Design

    77% of users were satisfied with the aesthetic design of the Zoom PodTrak P4. They appreciated the sleek and modern look, which was both functional and visually appealing. The layout of controls and interfaces was seen as well-considered, contributing to an overall positive impression.

    23% of users were not impressed with the aesthetic design, feeling it was somewhat basic and lacked the premium appearance of higher-end devices. Some users suggested that a more polished design could enhance the device's appeal and better reflect its technical capabilities.

    77%
  • Ease of Setup

    91% of users found the setup process for the Zoom PodTrak P4 to be straightforward and hassle-free. They appreciated the clear instructions and intuitive design, which allowed them to get started with recording quickly. Users valued the minimal time required to configure the device, enabling more focus on content creation.

    9% of users experienced challenges during setup, particularly those less familiar with audio equipment. They reported difficulties in understanding initial configuration steps and connecting the device with other equipment, which required additional help or resources to resolve.

    91%
  • Instructional Resources

    82% of users were satisfied with the instructional resources provided for the Zoom PodTrak P4. They found the user manual and online tutorials helpful in understanding the device's features and operation, which facilitated a smoother learning curve for new users.

    18% of users found the instructional resources lacking in detail or clarity. They noted that the manuals were sometimes confusing or incomplete, necessitating additional research or support to fully grasp the device's capabilities and settings.

    82%
  • Software Integration

    76% of users were pleased with the software integration capabilities of the Zoom PodTrak P4. They found it compatible with a range of popular recording and editing software, which allowed for seamless workflows and easy transfer of recordings for post-production.

    24% of users were dissatisfied with the software integration, encountering issues with connectivity and compatibility with certain programs. They expressed a desire for more seamless integration and support for additional software platforms to enhance the device's utility.

    76%
  • Purchase Value

    85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Zoom H6essential Portable Audio Recorder. They appreciated the versatility and quality it offers for its price point, noting that it provides a range of features that are often found in much more expensive models. Users particularly valued the multiple input options and the sound quality, which they found to be superior to other recorders in the same price range.

    15% of users expressed dissatisfaction, primarily due to the cost relative to their specific needs. Some users felt that the additional features were unnecessary for their simple recording tasks, and thus, they did not see the value in investing in this model. Additionally, a few users mentioned that they expected more accessories to be included in the package for the price.

    85%
  • Quality of Materials

    90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Zoom H6essential. They reported that the device felt robust and durable, with high-quality components that contribute to its longevity. Users appreciated the solid construction and the professional feel of the recorder, which reassured them of its durability in various recording environments.

    10% of users had issues with the quality of materials, citing concerns about the plastic components used in some parts of the recorder. A few users reported that the device felt bulky and less portable than expected due to its construction, which affected their overall satisfaction.

    90%
  • Ease of Use

    80% of users found the Zoom H6essential easy to use. They appreciated the intuitive interface and the straightforward menu system, which allowed even beginners to navigate the device without difficulty. The clear labeling of buttons and functions helped users quickly master the recorder's operations.

    20% of users found the device somewhat complicated, especially those who were new to audio recording. They reported that the manual was not detailed enough, leading to a learning curve that was steeper than anticipated. Some users also mentioned that the multitude of features could be overwhelming for those who just needed basic recording capabilities.

    80%
  • Sound Quality

    92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality of the Zoom H6essential. They praised its ability to capture clear and high-fidelity audio, noting the low noise floor and the clarity of recordings even in challenging environments. Users found the preamps to be among the best in portable recorders, contributing to excellent sound reproduction.

    8% of users were less satisfied with the sound quality, particularly those who encountered issues with certain microphones not performing optimally with the recorder. A few users also mentioned that the default settings required adjustment to achieve the desired sound quality, which was not ideal for quick setup situations.

    92%
  • Portability

    75% of users were satisfied with the portability of the Zoom H6essential, citing its relatively compact size and lightweight design as advantageous for field recordings and on-the-go use. They appreciated that the device could be easily transported in a backpack or gear bag without adding significant weight.

    25% of users were dissatisfied with the portability, mentioning that the device was bulkier than expected when compared to other portable recorders. Some users found that the need for additional accessories, such as external microphones and stands, reduced the overall portability and convenience.

    75%
  • Battery Life

    78% of users were satisfied with the battery life of the Zoom H6essential, finding it sufficient for most recording sessions. They appreciated the option to use AA batteries, which are easy to replace or carry spares for longer recording needs.

    22% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the battery life, noting that it was shorter than expected during extended recording sessions. Some users were disappointed that the device did not include a rechargeable battery option, which they felt could have enhanced convenience and reduced the cost of purchasing disposable batteries.

    78%
  • Input Options

    88% of users were satisfied with the input options available on the Zoom H6essential. They appreciated the flexibility provided by the multiple XLR/TRS inputs, which allowed them to connect various microphones and instruments. This versatility was particularly valued by users who needed to record multiple sources simultaneously.

    12% of users were less satisfied with the input options, primarily due to the lack of support for certain input types they required for specific recording setups. A few users mentioned compatibility issues with some types of microphones, which limited their ability to fully utilize the recorder's capabilities.

    88%
  • Overall Durability

    87% of users were satisfied with the overall durability of the Zoom H6essential. They reported that the device withstood regular use without significant wear and tear, and its build quality was robust enough to handle various recording environments.

    13% of users expressed concerns about durability, citing issues with certain components, such as the knobs and switches, which they felt were prone to damage over time. Some users also mentioned that the device did not perform well in harsh conditions, such as extreme temperatures or humidity.

    87%
  • Display Quality

    82% of users were satisfied with the display quality of the Zoom H6essential. They found the screen to be clear and easy to read, even in low-light conditions, which aided in navigation and monitoring during recordings.

    18% of users were dissatisfied with the display quality, particularly those who experienced difficulties reading the screen in bright sunlight. Some users also felt that the display size was too small for detailed monitoring, which was a drawback for those who needed to make precise adjustments quickly.

    82%
  • Customer Support

    70% of users were satisfied with customer support, appreciating the quick response times and helpfulness of the support staff in resolving issues and answering product questions.

    30% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, reporting delays in responses and difficulties in obtaining satisfactory resolutions to their problems. Some users felt that the support team lacked in-depth product knowledge, which hindered effective troubleshooting.

    70%
  • Accessories Included

    65% of users were satisfied with the accessories included with the Zoom H6essential, finding the basics sufficient for getting started with recordings.

    35% of users were dissatisfied with the included accessories, expressing a desire for more comprehensive kits that would eliminate the need to purchase additional items separately. Some felt that the lack of a carrying case was a significant oversight for a portable device.

    65%
  • Firmware Updates

    76% of users were satisfied with the availability and ease of installing firmware updates, which they found enhanced the functionality and performance of the recorder.

    24% of users were dissatisfied with the firmware update process, citing technical difficulties and a lack of clear instructions. Some users experienced issues with updates causing compatibility problems with existing setups.

    76%
  • Weight

    70% of users were satisfied with the weight of the Zoom H6essential, finding it manageable for field use without causing fatigue.

    30% of users were dissatisfied with the weight, considering it heavier than comparable models, which they felt affected portability and ease of transport.

    70%
  • Preamps Quality

    92% of users were satisfied with the preamps quality, praising the low noise and high gain capabilities that contributed to excellent audio recordings.

    8% of users were dissatisfied with the preamps quality, encountering issues with certain microphones that did not perform as expected, which they attributed to the preamps.

    92%
  • Menu Navigation

    77% of users were satisfied with the menu navigation, finding it intuitive and easy to use for configuring settings and managing recordings.

    23% of users were dissatisfied with menu navigation, noting that it was not as straightforward as they expected, leading to confusion and errors in settings adjustments.

    77%
  • Build Quality

    85% of users were satisfied with the build quality, appreciating the sturdy construction and reliable performance over time.

    15% of users were dissatisfied with the build quality, citing issues with some components feeling flimsy or prone to breaking under stress.

    85%
  • Recording Flexibility

    90% of users were satisfied with the recording flexibility, valuing the multiple input options and customizable settings for different recording scenarios.

    10% of users were dissatisfied with recording flexibility, finding certain limitations in input compatibility and settings adjustments for specific needs.

    90%
  • Software Compatibility

    78% of users were satisfied with software compatibility, finding it easy to integrate with popular audio editing programs for post-production work.

    22% of users were dissatisfied with software compatibility, encountering issues with certain DAWs and required additional software for full functionality.

    78%
  • Microphone Quality

    88% of users were satisfied with the microphone quality, appreciating the clarity and detail captured by the included microphones.

    12% of users were dissatisfied with the microphone quality, noting that they needed to purchase higher-end microphones to achieve the desired quality for professional use.

    88%
  • Durability in Extreme Conditions

    68% of users were satisfied with its durability in extreme conditions, finding it reliable in moderate outdoor settings.

    32% of users were dissatisfied with its performance in extreme conditions, reporting issues with functionality in very cold or humid environments.

    68%
Show More
Pros:
  • Portable design makes it ideal for on-the-go recording.
  • Supports up to four microphones with independent volume controls.
  • Built-in sound pads for triggering sound effects.
  • Can record to multiple tracks simultaneously.
  • Offers battery power option for increased mobility.
  • Includes a USB audio interface for easy integration with computers.
  • Affordable option for podcasters seeking multitrack recording capabilities.
  • High-quality audio recording with interchangeable microphone capsules.
  • Six-track simultaneous recording capability.
  • Intuitive interface with a large, color LCD display.
  • Versatile inputs, including four XLR/TRS combo jacks.
  • Long battery life suitable for extended recording sessions.
  • Compact and portable design, ideal for field recordings.
Cons:
  • Limited to four microphone inputs, which may be insufficient for larger setups.
  • Build quality may not be as robust as higher-end models.
  • Lacks some advanced editing features found in more expensive recorders.
  • May require additional accessories for optimal use, such as external microphones and memory cards.
  • Menu navigation can be complex for first-time users.
  • Relatively high price point compared to simpler models.
  • Large file sizes can quickly fill up storage.
  • The unit can be complex for beginners due to its advanced features.
  • Limited onboard effects and editing capabilities.
  • Requires additional accessories for optimal performance in certain scenarios.
Portable Recorder
Form Factor
Handheld Recorder Handheld Recorder
Primary Use Applications
Music Recording, Podcasting Audio-for-Video, Dictation & Transcription, Music Recording, Podcasting
Number of Tracks
WAV:
10 (4 Inputs + Stereo Mix)		 8 (6 Inputs + Stereo Mix)
Number of Input Channels
4 6 (4 x Mono, 1 x Stereo)
Maximum Sampling Rate
44.1 kHz / 16-Bit 96 kHz / 32-Bit Float
Microphone
Interchangeable Cardioid Condenser Stereo Pair, X/Y Configuration
Number of Microphone Inputs
4 4
Built-In Speaker
Yes, 500 mW Mono
Display
Monochrome LCD 2" / 5.1 cm Color LCD
Memory Card Support
SDHC (4 GB to 32 GB)
SDXC (64 GB to 512 GB)		 microSDXC (Up to 1 TB)
Internal Storage
Special Features
Overdubbing

The Zoom H6essential Portable Audio Recorder and the Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder are both handheld recorders designed for audio recording, but they differ significantly in features and capabilities. The H6essential is more versatile, making it suitable for a range of applications, including audio-for-video, dictation and transcription, music recording, and podcasting. In contrast, the PodTrak P4 is primarily focused on music recording and podcasting.Show More


In terms of track capability, the Zoom H6essential supports up to 8 tracks with 6 inputs and a stereo mix, whereas the PodTrak P4 allows for 10 tracks with 4 inputs plus a stereo mix. The H6essential offers a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz at 32-bit float, which provides superior audio quality compared to the PodTrak P4's maximum of 44.1 kHz at 16-bit. Both devices feature 4 microphone inputs, but the H6essential comes with an interchangeable cardioid condenser stereo pair in an X/Y configuration, enhancing its recording flexibility.


The Zoom H6essential includes a built-in speaker rated at 500 mW mono, while the PodTrak P4 lacks this feature, requiring external monitoring options. The H6essential also boasts a 2-inch color LCD display, offering more detailed visual feedback compared to the monochrome LCD found on the PodTrak P4. In terms of memory support, the H6essential accepts microSDXC cards up to 1 TB, significantly outpacing the PodTrak P4's SDHC and SDXC support range of 4 GB to 512 GB.


Lastly, the Zoom H6essential includes overdubbing as a special feature, enhancing its functionality for complex recordings, while the PodTrak P4 does not offer any special features. Overall, the H6essential is better suited for diverse recording environments and applications, while the PodTrak P4 is more streamlined for podcasting and music recording with less emphasis on advanced features.

Recording
Audio File Formats
WAV BWF, iXML, WAV
Sample Rates
44.1 kHz (Record/Playback) 44.1 / 48 / 96 kHz
Bit Depth
16-Bit (Recording) Up to 32-Bit (Floating Point)
Timecode Support
Included Software

The Zoom H6essential Portable Audio Recorder offers a versatile range of audio file formats including BWF, iXML, and WAV. It supports sample rates of 44.1, 48, and 96 kHz, making it suitable for high-quality recordings. The device boasts an impressive bit depth of up to 32-Bit (Floating Point), which allows for a greater dynamic range and more detailed sound capture. However, it does not feature timecode support and does not come with any included software.Show More


In contrast, the Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder is more specialized for podcasting, with a focus on ease of use for voice recording. It supports the WAV audio file format and has a fixed sample rate of 44.1 kHz for both recording and playback. The device features a lower bit depth of 16-Bit during recording, which may limit the dynamic range compared to the H6. Like the H6, the PodTrak P4 also does not include timecode support and lacks included software.


When it comes to audio processing features, the PodTrak P4 has built-in signal processing and effects such as a limiter and a low-cut filter, which can enhance voice clarity during podcast recordings. The H6, while more flexible in audio formats and sample rates, does not offer these specific features for optimizing voice recordings. Each device caters to different needs: the H6 for high-fidelity recordings and the PodTrak P4 for streamlined podcast production.

Connectivity
Analog I/O
4x XLR 3-Pin Female Balanced Mic Input
4x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Female Unbalanced Headphone Output
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRRS Female Unbalanced Aux Input
1x 2.5 mm TRRS Female Unbalanced Remote Input		 4x Combo XLR-1/4" 3-Pin Female Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Mic Input (Lockable)
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Female Line Output
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Female Headphone Output
Digital I/O
Phantom Power
+48 V, Selectable On/Off (Selectable on Individual Inputs) +48 V
System Connection
1x USB-C (I/O)
1x USB-C (Bus-Power Only)		 1x USB-C (I/O, 2.0)
Audio Interface Capability
Multi-Track Stereo Only
Wireless
Bluetooth
*Via Optional Adapter		 Bluetooth
*Via Optional Adapter
Mobile App Compatible
Yes: iOS Only
App Name: H6essential Control App
Functionality: Remote Control

When comparing the Zoom H6essential Portable Audio Recorder and the Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder, both devices offer a robust set of features tailored for audio recording needs. The H6essential provides 4x Combo XLR-1/4" inputs that support balanced/unbalanced line or mic input, while the PodTrak P4 features 4x XLR inputs specifically designed for balanced mic input. This makes the P4 slightly more specialized for podcasting with dedicated mic inputs.Show More


In terms of output, the H6essential includes a 1x 1/8" headphone output and a 1/8" line output, allowing for monitoring and playback. The PodTrak P4, on the other hand, offers 4x 1/8" headphone outputs, which is advantageous for multi-person setups as it allows multiple users to monitor audio simultaneously. Additionally, the P4 includes an Aux Input and a Remote Input, enhancing its versatility for podcasting applications.


Both devices support +48 V phantom power, but the PodTrak P4 allows for selectable phantom power on individual inputs, offering greater control over connected microphones. For connectivity, both recorders feature USB-C connections, but the P4 adds a Bus-Power Only USB-C option, which can be convenient for portable use.


Lastly, the H6essential is compatible with a mobile app, specifically the H6essential Control App for iOS, enabling remote control functionalities. In contrast, the PodTrak P4 does not have mobile app compatibility, focusing instead on direct recording and playback capabilities. Overall, while both devices excel in their own right, the choice between them largely depends on the specific recording needs and preferences of the user.

Performance
Power
Power Options
Battery, USB Bus Power, or AC/DC Power Adapter Battery, USB Bus Power, AC/DC Power Adapter
Battery Type
2x AA (Included) 4x AA
Approximate Battery Life
WAV 44.1 kHz/16-Bit:
4 Hours (AA Alkaline, Phantom Off)
4.5 Hours (AA NiMH, Phantom Off)
9 Hours (AA Lithium, Phantom Off)		 48 kHz/32-Bit:
18 Hours (AA Alkaline, 2 Channels, Recording, Built-In Mic)
AC/DC Power Adapter
5 VDC at 1 A (Not Included) 5 VDC at 1 A (Included)

The Zoom H6essential Portable Audio Recorder offers versatile power options, including battery, USB bus power, and AC/DC power adapter. It operates on 4x AA batteries and boasts an impressive battery life of up to 18 hours at 48 kHz/32-Bit recording with two channels using built-in microphones. An AC/DC power adapter is included, providing convenience for extended recording sessions.Show More


In contrast, the Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder also features multiple power options such as battery, USB bus power, or AC/DC power adapter. It uses 2x AA batteries and has a considerably shorter battery life, offering approximately 4 hours when recording in WAV 44.1 kHz/16-Bit with phantom power off. However, it can last up to 9 hours with AA lithium batteries under the same conditions. Notably, the AC/DC power adapter is not included, which may require additional investment for users.


Overall, the Zoom H6essential excels in battery life and power flexibility, making it ideal for long-duration recordings, while the Zoom PodTrak P4 provides a lighter battery option but requires more frequent charging or battery replacement during extended use. Each device caters to different needs, with the H6essential being better suited for extensive field recording and the PodTrak P4 focusing on podcasting convenience.

Physical
Included Accessories
Dimensions
4.4 x 1.9 x 6.1" / 112 x 47 x 155 mm 3.1 x 1.7 x 6.3" / 78.1 x 42.8 x 160 mm
Weight
10.2 oz / 290 g (without Batteries) 13.4 oz / 381 g (with Batteries)

The Zoom H6essential Portable Audio Recorder measures 3.1 x 1.7 x 6.3 inches and weighs 13.4 oz (or 381 g with batteries). Its compact size and relatively higher weight make it suitable for various recording environments, providing a robust option for users who prioritize durability and a solid build in their audio recording equipment.Show More


In contrast, the Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder has dimensions of 4.4 x 1.9 x 6.1 inches and a lighter weight of 10.2 oz (or 290 g without batteries). This slightly larger footprint combined with a lower weight might appeal to podcasters looking for a portable solution that is easy to carry while still offering ample functionality for their recording needs.


Both devices do not include additional accessories, which means users will need to consider purchasing necessary components separately to enhance their recording experience. The H6essential's design may lend itself more to versatile recording applications, while the PodTrak P4, being specifically designed for podcasting, is tailored with features that cater to that particular niche.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
1.21 lb 1.055 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
8.3 x 6.4 x 2.4" 10.6 x 5.4 x 2"

The Zoom H6essential Portable Audio Recorder has a package weight of 1.055 lb and dimensions of 10.6 x 5.4 x 2". This compact design makes it easy to handle and transport, ideal for various recording situations such as music, interviews, and field recordings. The lightweight nature contributes to its portability, making it convenient for users who need a reliable audio recording solution on the go.Show More


In comparison, the Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder weighs slightly more at 1.21 lb and features box dimensions of 8.3 x 6.4 x 2.4". While it is a bit heavier, its dimensions are designed to accommodate podcasting needs, offering more versatile connectivity options for multiple microphones and inputs. The design prioritizes functionality specifically for podcasters, making it a suitable choice for those who frequently produce multi-person recordings.


Both recorders emphasize portability, but the Zoom H6 offers a more lightweight option, while the PodTrak P4 provides additional size that supports podcasting features. Users should consider their specific recording requirements when choosing between these two options, as each offers unique advantages tailored to different audio recording scenarios.

Customer Images
Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder
(21) Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder
Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder
Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder
Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder
Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder
Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder
Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder
Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder
Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder
Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder
Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder
Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder
Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder
Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder
Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder
Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder
Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder
Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder
Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder
Zoom PodTrak P4 Portable Multitrack Podcast Recorder
Zoom H6essential Portable Audio Recorder
Videos