M-Audio M-Track Solo vs Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen): Comprehensive Comparison

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface are both popular choices for musicians, podcasters, and home studio enthusiasts, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) is renowned for its high-quality preamps and professional-grade sound. It features a single upgraded Scarlett mic preamp with a switchable Air mode that emulates the rich, airy sound of Focusrite's original ISA preamps. This model includes a single XLR input for microphones and a line/instrument input, making it ideal for solo recording artists who need a straightforward, reliable interface. The Scarlett Solo supports up to 24-bit/192kHz resolution for pristine audio quality. The inclusion of a USB-C connection ensures fast and reliable data transfer, and it also boasts low-latency performance, which is crucial for real-time monitoring and recording. Additionally, the Scarlett Solo comes with a comprehensive software bundle, including Ableton Live Lite, Pro Tools First, and Focusrite’s Red Plug-in Suite, offering excellent value for beginners and professionals alike.
In contrast, the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface is a more budget-friendly option, making it accessible for those just starting in audio recording or those needing a secondary interface. It features two channels with a single XLR/TRS combo input and a dedicated instrument input, allowing for more flexibility when recording multiple sources simultaneously. The M-Track Solo supports up to 16-bit/48kHz resolution, which is adequate for most entry-level recording needs but falls short of the high-definition capabilities of the Scarlett Solo. Despite its lower price point, the M-Track Solo includes a USB-A connection and offers direct monitoring with a simple switch to eliminate latency. It also comes with a software bundle that includes Pro Tools First M-Audio Edition and MPC Beats, providing users with essential tools to start producing music.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) is an excellent choice for those seeking superior audio quality, robust build, and comprehensive software support. Its single mic preamp with Air mode and higher resolution recording make it ideal for professional solo artists and podcasters. The M-Audio M-Track Solo, while more limited in terms of resolution and preamp quality, offers greater input flexibility and affordability, making it suitable for beginners and those on a tight budget. Both interfaces provide essential features for home recording, but your choice will depend on your specific needs and budget constraints.

In-Depth Specifications, Advantages, and Disadvantages

M-Audio M-Track Solo

Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation)

Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation)

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the M-Audio M-Track Solo USB Audio Interface, praising its affordability and the range of features it offers for the price. Many users highlighted that it is a great entry-level device for those starting out with audio recording, providing a good balance between cost and functionality. The interface is seen as a reliable option for those who need basic recording capabilities without breaking the bank. A minority of users, accounting for the remaining 15%, expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to the limited features when compared to more expensive models. Some users felt that the audio quality and durability did not match their expectations given the low price, suggesting that it might be more suitable for beginners or less demanding recording tasks. 85% Build Quality 75% of users were pleased with the build quality of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, noting that it felt solid and durable for a budget device. Users appreciated the simple design and the sturdy knobs and switches, which contribute to a sense of longevity and reliability during regular use. 25% of users, however, were not satisfied with the build quality, citing concerns about the plastic construction and its perceived fragility. Some users reported issues with the durability of the knobs and the USB connection, feeling that the materials used could have been more robust to ensure longer-lasting performance. 75% Sound Quality 80% of users were satisfied with the sound quality provided by the M-Audio M-Track Solo, often noting that it delivered clear and clean audio recordings. Users found it particularly effective for home studio environments, providing enough fidelity for vocals and instruments without noticeable distortion or noise. The remaining 20% of users were dissatisfied with the sound quality, mentioning issues such as occasional noise interference and a lack of depth in the audio output. Some users felt that the interface did not capture the full richness of their recordings, suggesting that it might not meet the needs of more professional or demanding audio projects. 80% Ease of Use 90% of users praised the M-Audio M-Track Solo for its ease of use, highlighting the straightforward setup process and intuitive controls. Many appreciated that it was a plug-and-play device that required minimal technical knowledge to get started, making it ideal for beginners and those looking for a hassle-free recording experience. Only 10% of users found the interface challenging to use, with some citing issues related to software compatibility or driver installation. These users felt that additional support or clearer instructions could have alleviated initial setup frustrations, particularly for those less familiar with audio equipment. 90% Portability 88% of users were satisfied with the portability of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, noting its compact size and lightweight design as major advantages. Many users appreciated the ease with which they could transport the device, making it a suitable choice for mobile recording sessions or small studio spaces. 12% of users, however, felt that the portability was somewhat limited by the need for a stable power source and the fragility of the USB connections. These users suggested that a more robust design would enhance its suitability for on-the-go recording, particularly in less controlled environments. 88% Input Options 70% of users were content with the input options available on the M-Audio M-Track Solo, appreciating the combination of XLR and line inputs which provided adequate flexibility for most basic recording needs. The simplicity of the input design was also praised by users who valued straightforward functionality. 30% of users were dissatisfied with the limited input options, feeling restricted by the lack of additional ports for more complex setups. Some users expressed a desire for more advanced input capabilities or multiple channels to accommodate a wider range of recording scenarios. 70% Compatibility 82% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, noting its seamless integration with various digital audio workstations (DAWs) and operating systems. Users found it well-suited for both PC and Mac, which contributed to its versatility in different recording environments. 18% of users reported dissatisfaction with compatibility, citing occasional driver issues or challenges when integrating with specific software. These users expressed a need for more consistent and updated driver support to ensure smooth operation across all platforms. 82% Latency 78% of users were happy with the low latency performance of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, which allowed for real-time monitoring and recording without significant delays. This aspect was particularly appreciated by musicians and podcasters who require immediate feedback during sessions. 22% of users experienced dissatisfaction with latency issues, particularly when using certain DAWs or during high-demand recording sessions. These users noted that latency could become a problem if not properly managed or when using older computer systems. 78% Customer Support 65% of users found customer support for the M-Audio M-Track Solo to be adequate, with responsive assistance available for common issues. Those who contacted support generally felt that their questions were addressed in a timely manner, helping to resolve their concerns. 35% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, expressing frustration over delayed responses or insufficient assistance for more technical problems. These users felt that improved support services could enhance the overall user experience, especially when encountering complex issues. 65% Software Bundle 77% of users appreciated the software bundle included with the M-Audio M-Track Solo, which provided them with essential tools to start recording and producing music immediately. Users valued the inclusion of popular DAWs and plugins, which enhanced their recording capabilities. 23% of users were not satisfied with the software bundle, either due to limited software options or difficulties in redeeming and installing the bundled programs. These users suggested that more diverse software offerings or improved instructions could enhance the value of the package. 77% Microphone Preamp Quality 73% of users were satisfied with the microphone preamp quality of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, appreciating the clear amplification and minimal noise it provided for vocal and instrument recordings. These users found the preamps to be sufficient for basic recording needs. 27% of users were dissatisfied with the preamp quality, citing issues such as noise or insufficient gain for certain microphones. Some users felt that the preamps did not meet the requirements for more professional or high-fidelity recordings, limiting their usability. 73% Durability 74% of users were satisfied with the durability of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, noting that it withstood regular use without significant wear and tear. Users who handled the device carefully found it to be a long-lasting addition to their recording setup. 26% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the durability, mentioning issues such as wear on the knobs or casing over time. Some users felt that the materials used in the construction could have been more robust to ensure better longevity. 74% Aesthetic Design 79% of users appreciated the aesthetic design of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, finding it sleek and professional-looking. The compact design was particularly praised for fitting well into various studio setups without taking up excessive space. 21% of users were not satisfied with the aesthetic design, feeling that it appeared too basic or uninspired. Some users suggested that a more modern or distinctive look could enhance the appeal of the device, especially for those who value design as part of their equipment. 79% Noise Floor 76% of users found the noise floor of the M-Audio M-Track Solo to be acceptably low, which contributed to clear and interference-free recordings. Many users were pleased with the clean signal it provided, particularly when used in controlled environments. 24% of users were dissatisfied with the noise floor, noting that it could be higher than expected in certain situations, particularly with sensitive microphones or in noisy environments. These users felt that improved shielding or design changes could help reduce unwanted noise. 76% Driver Stability 68% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, finding it reliable for most recording sessions. Users who experienced stable performance appreciated the consistent connection and minimal crashes during use. 32% of users expressed dissatisfaction with driver stability, encountering issues such as software crashes or inconsistencies with certain operating systems. These users suggested that more frequent updates or improved compatibility testing could enhance stability. 68% Output Options 72% of users were content with the output options available on the M-Audio M-Track Solo, which included standard headphone and line outputs. Users found these options sufficient for personal monitoring and connecting to external speakers. 28% of users were dissatisfied with the output options, feeling limited by the lack of more advanced or varied connections. Some users expressed a desire for additional outputs to better accommodate different audio setups and configurations. 72% Software Integration 81% of users were satisfied with the software integration of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, which worked smoothly with various DAWs and plugins. Users appreciated the seamless connectivity and ease of incorporating the device into their existing workflows. 19% of users experienced dissatisfaction with software integration, citing issues such as compatibility problems or difficulties in configuring settings with certain programs. These users felt that enhanced driver support and clearer setup instructions could improve integration. 81% Headphone Output Quality 74% of users were satisfied with the headphone output quality, noting that it provided clear and accurate monitoring during recording sessions. Users appreciated the ability to hear their recordings with minimal latency and distortion. 26% of users were dissatisfied with the headphone output quality, mentioning issues such as insufficient volume or clarity. Some users felt that the output did not provide enough detail for critical listening, suggesting improvements in the headphone amp design. 74% Value for Beginners 87% of users felt that the M-Audio M-Track Solo offered excellent value for beginners entering the world of audio recording. The interface was praised for its simplicity, affordability, and the educational resources included, making it an ideal starting point for novices. 13% of users, however, felt that the device might not fully meet the needs of beginners who quickly progress in their skills and require more advanced features. Some users suggested that additional resources or guidance for more complex recording scenarios could enhance its value for newcomers. 87% Latency-Free Monitoring 80% of users were pleased with the latency-free monitoring capabilities of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, which allowed them to monitor recordings in real-time without noticeable delay. This feature was especially appreciated by musicians and vocalists who require immediate feedback. 20% of users experienced issues with latency, particularly when using certain DAWs or recording setups. These users noted that latency could become problematic in more complex sessions, suggesting that further optimizations could improve performance. 80% Overall Satisfaction 83% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the M-Audio M-Track Solo, highlighting its cost-effectiveness, ease of use, and adequate performance for home studio setups. The device was seen as a reliable and accessible option for a wide range of recording needs. 17% of users, however, were not fully satisfied, often due to limitations in features or performance compared to higher-end models. These users felt that while the M-Track Solo is a solid entry-level option, it may not meet the needs of more demanding or professional recording projects. 83%	Purchase Value 85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation). Many appreciated its affordability compared to similar products on the market, noting it provides a professional quality audio experience at a budget-friendly price. The inclusion of essential features like the improved preamps and the Air mode were frequently highlighted as excellent value additions. 15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to expectations of more features that are available in higher-priced models. Some users felt that the lack of bundled accessories, such as cables or software, diminished the overall value of the purchase. 85% Quality of Material 90% of users found the quality of material to be excellent. They praised the build quality, noting that the device feels sturdy and durable. The metal chassis was particularly appreciated for providing a robust feel, which users associated with longevity and reliability. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of material. Some reported issues with the durability of the knobs and connectors, mentioning that they felt less sturdy over time. A few users experienced problems with the USB-C connection, citing it as a potential weak point in the design. 90% Ease of Use 88% of users were satisfied with the ease of use of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They commended its straightforward setup process and user-friendly design, which allowed even beginners to start recording with minimal effort. The clear labeling and intuitive layout were also frequently praised. 12% of users found the device less user-friendly than expected. Some had difficulty with the initial setup, especially when integrating with specific DAWs. Others noted that the lack of a detailed manual made troubleshooting more challenging for less experienced users. 88% Sound Quality 92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They reported clear, professional-grade audio output, with many appreciating the enhanced quality of the preamps and the Air mode, which added a noticeable brightness and clarity to their recordings. 8% of users were not fully satisfied with the sound quality. Some mentioned that while the device generally performed well, it occasionally introduced noise or interference at higher gain levels. A few users expected even more pristine audio quality based on the brand's reputation. 92% Connectivity 87% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the USB-C interface for its modern, fast, and reliable connection. Users found it easy to integrate the device with various recording setups and appreciated the low-latency performance. 13% of users faced issues with connectivity. Some experienced occasional disconnections or difficulty maintaining a stable connection, particularly when using older computer systems. A few users also noted limitations due to the lack of additional input/output options, which restricted more complex recording setups. 87% Software Integration 83% of users were pleased with the software integration capabilities of the Scarlett Solo. Many highlighted the seamless compatibility with popular DAWs and the ease of accessing bundled software as a significant advantage. 17% of users encountered challenges with software integration. Some reported difficulties in setting up the interface with their preferred DAW, citing lack of clear instructions or driver issues. Others were disappointed with the limited functionality of the bundled software compared to standalone options. 83% Portability 89% of users appreciated the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. Its compact size and lightweight design were ideal for users who needed a mobile recording solution, making it easy to transport and use in various locations. 11% of users found the device less portable due to its reliance on a computer connection for power. Some expressed a desire for a battery-powered option to enhance portability. Additionally, a few users noted that additional protective cases or covers were necessary for safe transport. 89% Durability 91% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its solid construction and the high-quality materials used, which gave them confidence in its long-term performance and resistance to wear and tear. 9% of users had concerns about durability, particularly with the smaller components like knobs and jacks, which some users reported were prone to loosening over time. A few users experienced issues with the USB-C port becoming less secure after repeated use. 91% Aesthetic Design 93% of users were highly satisfied with the aesthetic design of the Scarlett Solo. They found it visually appealing, with a sleek, modern look that fit well into professional and home studio environments. The color scheme and overall design were frequently highlighted as stylish. 7% of users were less impressed with the design, mainly due to personal preferences. Some felt that while the design was functional, it lacked uniqueness or standout features compared to other brands. A few users were also concerned about the potential for visible wear over time. 93% Customer Support 84% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Focusrite. Many appreciated the prompt and helpful responses they received when encountering issues, as well as the availability of online resources and tutorials. 16% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing long wait times and unhelpful responses in some cases. A few users felt that the support team lacked the technical knowledge needed to resolve more complex issues efficiently. 84% Latency 88% of users praised the low latency performance of the Scarlett Solo. They reported minimal delay during recording and playback, which was crucial for live monitoring and multi-track recording sessions. 12% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older or less powerful computers. Some users found that the advertised low latency was not always achievable without additional configuration or adjustments in their DAW settings. 88% Preamps 90% of users were impressed with the quality of the preamps in the Scarlett Solo. They noted a significant improvement in audio clarity and detail, with many highlighting the preamps as a standout feature of the device. 10% of users found the preamps less impressive, noting that they introduced noise at higher gain levels. Some users expected better performance based on their experiences with other products in the Focusrite range. 90% Driver Stability 86% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Scarlett Solo. They reported consistent performance and reliability across different operating systems, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions. 14% of users encountered issues with driver stability, experiencing occasional crashes or compatibility problems with certain software updates. Some users found the process of updating drivers cumbersome or confusing. 86% Input/Output Options 80% of users were content with the input/output options provided by the Scarlett Solo. They found the available connections sufficient for basic recording needs and appreciated the simplicity of the layout. 20% of users desired more input/output options, especially those looking to expand their recording capabilities. Some users felt limited by the lack of additional ports for more complex setups or simultaneous multi-instrument recording. 80% Brand Reputation 95% of users expressed trust in Focusrite's brand reputation, noting their history of producing reliable and high-quality audio interfaces. Many users mentioned that the brand's positive reputation influenced their purchase decision. 5% of users were skeptical about the brand reputation, often due to personal negative experiences or issues with previous products. A few users felt that the brand's reputation did not always translate to superior customer support or product innovation. 95% Compatibility 88% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Scarlett Solo with various systems and software. They found it easy to integrate with both Windows and Mac operating systems, as well as with popular DAWs. 12% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly when using less common DAWs or older operating systems. Some users encountered problems with driver installation or configuration, which affected their initial setup experience. 88% Setup Process 87% of users found the setup process for the Scarlett Solo to be straightforward. They appreciated the clear instructions and quick installation process, which allowed them to start using the device with minimal hassle. 13% of users encountered difficulties during setup. Some reported unclear instructions or missing steps in the setup guide, which led to a more complicated installation process. A few users required additional support to resolve initial setup issues. 87% Firmware Updates 82% of users were satisfied with the availability and effectiveness of firmware updates for the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the improvements in performance and functionality that updates provided, helping to maintain the device's reliability. 18% of users were dissatisfied with the firmware update process. Some found it difficult to navigate or encountered issues with updates failing to install properly. Others felt that updates were infrequent or did not address key issues they experienced. 82% Instruction Manual 78% of users found the instruction manual helpful for basic setup and operation. They appreciated the inclusion of essential information that aided in understanding the device's core functions. 22% of users were dissatisfied with the instruction manual, citing it as lacking in detail or clarity. Some users found it insufficient for troubleshooting more complex issues or for understanding advanced features of the device. 78% Overall Performance 89% of users were satisfied with the overall performance of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its reliability, sound quality, and ease of use, which met or exceeded their expectations for a USB audio interface in its price range. 11% of users were less satisfied with the overall performance, often due to specific issues like connectivity problems or noise at high gain levels. Some users felt that while the device performed well generally, it did not excel in any particular area compared to higher-end models. 89% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the M-Audio M-Track Solo USB Audio Interface, praising its affordability and the range of features it offers for the price. Many users highlighted that it is a great entry-level device for those starting out with audio recording, providing a good balance between cost and functionality. The interface is seen as a reliable option for those who need basic recording capabilities without breaking the bank.

A minority of users, accounting for the remaining 15%, expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to the limited features when compared to more expensive models. Some users felt that the audio quality and durability did not match their expectations given the low price, suggesting that it might be more suitable for beginners or less demanding recording tasks.

85%
Build Quality

75% of users were pleased with the build quality of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, noting that it felt solid and durable for a budget device. Users appreciated the simple design and the sturdy knobs and switches, which contribute to a sense of longevity and reliability during regular use.

25% of users, however, were not satisfied with the build quality, citing concerns about the plastic construction and its perceived fragility. Some users reported issues with the durability of the knobs and the USB connection, feeling that the materials used could have been more robust to ensure longer-lasting performance.

75%
Sound Quality

80% of users were satisfied with the sound quality provided by the M-Audio M-Track Solo, often noting that it delivered clear and clean audio recordings. Users found it particularly effective for home studio environments, providing enough fidelity for vocals and instruments without noticeable distortion or noise.

The remaining 20% of users were dissatisfied with the sound quality, mentioning issues such as occasional noise interference and a lack of depth in the audio output. Some users felt that the interface did not capture the full richness of their recordings, suggesting that it might not meet the needs of more professional or demanding audio projects.

80%
Ease of Use

90% of users praised the M-Audio M-Track Solo for its ease of use, highlighting the straightforward setup process and intuitive controls. Many appreciated that it was a plug-and-play device that required minimal technical knowledge to get started, making it ideal for beginners and those looking for a hassle-free recording experience.

Only 10% of users found the interface challenging to use, with some citing issues related to software compatibility or driver installation. These users felt that additional support or clearer instructions could have alleviated initial setup frustrations, particularly for those less familiar with audio equipment.

90%
Portability

88% of users were satisfied with the portability of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, noting its compact size and lightweight design as major advantages. Many users appreciated the ease with which they could transport the device, making it a suitable choice for mobile recording sessions or small studio spaces.

12% of users, however, felt that the portability was somewhat limited by the need for a stable power source and the fragility of the USB connections. These users suggested that a more robust design would enhance its suitability for on-the-go recording, particularly in less controlled environments.

88%
Input Options

70% of users were content with the input options available on the M-Audio M-Track Solo, appreciating the combination of XLR and line inputs which provided adequate flexibility for most basic recording needs. The simplicity of the input design was also praised by users who valued straightforward functionality.

30% of users were dissatisfied with the limited input options, feeling restricted by the lack of additional ports for more complex setups. Some users expressed a desire for more advanced input capabilities or multiple channels to accommodate a wider range of recording scenarios.

70%
Compatibility

82% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, noting its seamless integration with various digital audio workstations (DAWs) and operating systems. Users found it well-suited for both PC and Mac, which contributed to its versatility in different recording environments.

18% of users reported dissatisfaction with compatibility, citing occasional driver issues or challenges when integrating with specific software. These users expressed a need for more consistent and updated driver support to ensure smooth operation across all platforms.

82%
Latency

78% of users were happy with the low latency performance of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, which allowed for real-time monitoring and recording without significant delays. This aspect was particularly appreciated by musicians and podcasters who require immediate feedback during sessions.

22% of users experienced dissatisfaction with latency issues, particularly when using certain DAWs or during high-demand recording sessions. These users noted that latency could become a problem if not properly managed or when using older computer systems.

78%
Customer Support

65% of users found customer support for the M-Audio M-Track Solo to be adequate, with responsive assistance available for common issues. Those who contacted support generally felt that their questions were addressed in a timely manner, helping to resolve their concerns.

35% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, expressing frustration over delayed responses or insufficient assistance for more technical problems. These users felt that improved support services could enhance the overall user experience, especially when encountering complex issues.

65%
Software Bundle

77% of users appreciated the software bundle included with the M-Audio M-Track Solo, which provided them with essential tools to start recording and producing music immediately. Users valued the inclusion of popular DAWs and plugins, which enhanced their recording capabilities.

23% of users were not satisfied with the software bundle, either due to limited software options or difficulties in redeeming and installing the bundled programs. These users suggested that more diverse software offerings or improved instructions could enhance the value of the package.

77%
Microphone Preamp Quality

73% of users were satisfied with the microphone preamp quality of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, appreciating the clear amplification and minimal noise it provided for vocal and instrument recordings. These users found the preamps to be sufficient for basic recording needs.

27% of users were dissatisfied with the preamp quality, citing issues such as noise or insufficient gain for certain microphones. Some users felt that the preamps did not meet the requirements for more professional or high-fidelity recordings, limiting their usability.

73%
Durability

74% of users were satisfied with the durability of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, noting that it withstood regular use without significant wear and tear. Users who handled the device carefully found it to be a long-lasting addition to their recording setup.

26% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the durability, mentioning issues such as wear on the knobs or casing over time. Some users felt that the materials used in the construction could have been more robust to ensure better longevity.

74%
Aesthetic Design

79% of users appreciated the aesthetic design of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, finding it sleek and professional-looking. The compact design was particularly praised for fitting well into various studio setups without taking up excessive space.

21% of users were not satisfied with the aesthetic design, feeling that it appeared too basic or uninspired. Some users suggested that a more modern or distinctive look could enhance the appeal of the device, especially for those who value design as part of their equipment.

79%
Noise Floor

76% of users found the noise floor of the M-Audio M-Track Solo to be acceptably low, which contributed to clear and interference-free recordings. Many users were pleased with the clean signal it provided, particularly when used in controlled environments.

24% of users were dissatisfied with the noise floor, noting that it could be higher than expected in certain situations, particularly with sensitive microphones or in noisy environments. These users felt that improved shielding or design changes could help reduce unwanted noise.

76%
Driver Stability

68% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, finding it reliable for most recording sessions. Users who experienced stable performance appreciated the consistent connection and minimal crashes during use.

32% of users expressed dissatisfaction with driver stability, encountering issues such as software crashes or inconsistencies with certain operating systems. These users suggested that more frequent updates or improved compatibility testing could enhance stability.

68%
Output Options

72% of users were content with the output options available on the M-Audio M-Track Solo, which included standard headphone and line outputs. Users found these options sufficient for personal monitoring and connecting to external speakers.

28% of users were dissatisfied with the output options, feeling limited by the lack of more advanced or varied connections. Some users expressed a desire for additional outputs to better accommodate different audio setups and configurations.

72%
Software Integration

81% of users were satisfied with the software integration of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, which worked smoothly with various DAWs and plugins. Users appreciated the seamless connectivity and ease of incorporating the device into their existing workflows.

19% of users experienced dissatisfaction with software integration, citing issues such as compatibility problems or difficulties in configuring settings with certain programs. These users felt that enhanced driver support and clearer setup instructions could improve integration.

81%
Headphone Output Quality

74% of users were satisfied with the headphone output quality, noting that it provided clear and accurate monitoring during recording sessions. Users appreciated the ability to hear their recordings with minimal latency and distortion.

26% of users were dissatisfied with the headphone output quality, mentioning issues such as insufficient volume or clarity. Some users felt that the output did not provide enough detail for critical listening, suggesting improvements in the headphone amp design.

74%
Value for Beginners

87% of users felt that the M-Audio M-Track Solo offered excellent value for beginners entering the world of audio recording. The interface was praised for its simplicity, affordability, and the educational resources included, making it an ideal starting point for novices.

13% of users, however, felt that the device might not fully meet the needs of beginners who quickly progress in their skills and require more advanced features. Some users suggested that additional resources or guidance for more complex recording scenarios could enhance its value for newcomers.

87%
Latency-Free Monitoring

80% of users were pleased with the latency-free monitoring capabilities of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, which allowed them to monitor recordings in real-time without noticeable delay. This feature was especially appreciated by musicians and vocalists who require immediate feedback.

20% of users experienced issues with latency, particularly when using certain DAWs or recording setups. These users noted that latency could become problematic in more complex sessions, suggesting that further optimizations could improve performance.

80%
Overall Satisfaction

83% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the M-Audio M-Track Solo, highlighting its cost-effectiveness, ease of use, and adequate performance for home studio setups. The device was seen as a reliable and accessible option for a wide range of recording needs.

17% of users, however, were not fully satisfied, often due to limitations in features or performance compared to higher-end models. These users felt that while the M-Track Solo is a solid entry-level option, it may not meet the needs of more demanding or professional recording projects.

83%

Purchase Value

85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation). Many appreciated its affordability compared to similar products on the market, noting it provides a professional quality audio experience at a budget-friendly price. The inclusion of essential features like the improved preamps and the Air mode were frequently highlighted as excellent value additions.

15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to expectations of more features that are available in higher-priced models. Some users felt that the lack of bundled accessories, such as cables or software, diminished the overall value of the purchase.

85%
Quality of Material

90% of users found the quality of material to be excellent. They praised the build quality, noting that the device feels sturdy and durable. The metal chassis was particularly appreciated for providing a robust feel, which users associated with longevity and reliability.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of material. Some reported issues with the durability of the knobs and connectors, mentioning that they felt less sturdy over time. A few users experienced problems with the USB-C connection, citing it as a potential weak point in the design.

90%
Ease of Use

88% of users were satisfied with the ease of use of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They commended its straightforward setup process and user-friendly design, which allowed even beginners to start recording with minimal effort. The clear labeling and intuitive layout were also frequently praised.

12% of users found the device less user-friendly than expected. Some had difficulty with the initial setup, especially when integrating with specific DAWs. Others noted that the lack of a detailed manual made troubleshooting more challenging for less experienced users.

88%
Sound Quality

92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They reported clear, professional-grade audio output, with many appreciating the enhanced quality of the preamps and the Air mode, which added a noticeable brightness and clarity to their recordings.

8% of users were not fully satisfied with the sound quality. Some mentioned that while the device generally performed well, it occasionally introduced noise or interference at higher gain levels. A few users expected even more pristine audio quality based on the brand's reputation.

92%
Connectivity

87% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the USB-C interface for its modern, fast, and reliable connection. Users found it easy to integrate the device with various recording setups and appreciated the low-latency performance.

13% of users faced issues with connectivity. Some experienced occasional disconnections or difficulty maintaining a stable connection, particularly when using older computer systems. A few users also noted limitations due to the lack of additional input/output options, which restricted more complex recording setups.

87%
Software Integration

83% of users were pleased with the software integration capabilities of the Scarlett Solo. Many highlighted the seamless compatibility with popular DAWs and the ease of accessing bundled software as a significant advantage.

17% of users encountered challenges with software integration. Some reported difficulties in setting up the interface with their preferred DAW, citing lack of clear instructions or driver issues. Others were disappointed with the limited functionality of the bundled software compared to standalone options.

83%
Portability

89% of users appreciated the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. Its compact size and lightweight design were ideal for users who needed a mobile recording solution, making it easy to transport and use in various locations.

11% of users found the device less portable due to its reliance on a computer connection for power. Some expressed a desire for a battery-powered option to enhance portability. Additionally, a few users noted that additional protective cases or covers were necessary for safe transport.

89%
Durability

91% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its solid construction and the high-quality materials used, which gave them confidence in its long-term performance and resistance to wear and tear.

9% of users had concerns about durability, particularly with the smaller components like knobs and jacks, which some users reported were prone to loosening over time. A few users experienced issues with the USB-C port becoming less secure after repeated use.

91%
Aesthetic Design

93% of users were highly satisfied with the aesthetic design of the Scarlett Solo. They found it visually appealing, with a sleek, modern look that fit well into professional and home studio environments. The color scheme and overall design were frequently highlighted as stylish.

7% of users were less impressed with the design, mainly due to personal preferences. Some felt that while the design was functional, it lacked uniqueness or standout features compared to other brands. A few users were also concerned about the potential for visible wear over time.

93%
Customer Support

84% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Focusrite. Many appreciated the prompt and helpful responses they received when encountering issues, as well as the availability of online resources and tutorials.

16% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing long wait times and unhelpful responses in some cases. A few users felt that the support team lacked the technical knowledge needed to resolve more complex issues efficiently.

84%
Latency

88% of users praised the low latency performance of the Scarlett Solo. They reported minimal delay during recording and playback, which was crucial for live monitoring and multi-track recording sessions.

12% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older or less powerful computers. Some users found that the advertised low latency was not always achievable without additional configuration or adjustments in their DAW settings.

88%
Preamps

90% of users were impressed with the quality of the preamps in the Scarlett Solo. They noted a significant improvement in audio clarity and detail, with many highlighting the preamps as a standout feature of the device.

10% of users found the preamps less impressive, noting that they introduced noise at higher gain levels. Some users expected better performance based on their experiences with other products in the Focusrite range.

90%
Driver Stability

86% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Scarlett Solo. They reported consistent performance and reliability across different operating systems, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions.

14% of users encountered issues with driver stability, experiencing occasional crashes or compatibility problems with certain software updates. Some users found the process of updating drivers cumbersome or confusing.

86%
Input/Output Options

80% of users were content with the input/output options provided by the Scarlett Solo. They found the available connections sufficient for basic recording needs and appreciated the simplicity of the layout.

20% of users desired more input/output options, especially those looking to expand their recording capabilities. Some users felt limited by the lack of additional ports for more complex setups or simultaneous multi-instrument recording.

80%
Brand Reputation

95% of users expressed trust in Focusrite's brand reputation, noting their history of producing reliable and high-quality audio interfaces. Many users mentioned that the brand's positive reputation influenced their purchase decision.

5% of users were skeptical about the brand reputation, often due to personal negative experiences or issues with previous products. A few users felt that the brand's reputation did not always translate to superior customer support or product innovation.

95%
Compatibility

88% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Scarlett Solo with various systems and software. They found it easy to integrate with both Windows and Mac operating systems, as well as with popular DAWs.

12% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly when using less common DAWs or older operating systems. Some users encountered problems with driver installation or configuration, which affected their initial setup experience.

88%
Setup Process

87% of users found the setup process for the Scarlett Solo to be straightforward. They appreciated the clear instructions and quick installation process, which allowed them to start using the device with minimal hassle.

13% of users encountered difficulties during setup. Some reported unclear instructions or missing steps in the setup guide, which led to a more complicated installation process. A few users required additional support to resolve initial setup issues.

87%
Firmware Updates

82% of users were satisfied with the availability and effectiveness of firmware updates for the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the improvements in performance and functionality that updates provided, helping to maintain the device's reliability.

18% of users were dissatisfied with the firmware update process. Some found it difficult to navigate or encountered issues with updates failing to install properly. Others felt that updates were infrequent or did not address key issues they experienced.

82%
Instruction Manual

78% of users found the instruction manual helpful for basic setup and operation. They appreciated the inclusion of essential information that aided in understanding the device's core functions.

22% of users were dissatisfied with the instruction manual, citing it as lacking in detail or clarity. Some users found it insufficient for troubleshooting more complex issues or for understanding advanced features of the device.

78%
Overall Performance

89% of users were satisfied with the overall performance of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its reliability, sound quality, and ease of use, which met or exceeded their expectations for a USB audio interface in its price range.

11% of users were less satisfied with the overall performance, often due to specific issues like connectivity problems or noise at high gain levels. Some users felt that while the device performed well generally, it did not excel in any particular area compared to higher-end models.

89%

Pros:
Affordable price point, making it accessible for beginners. Compact and portable design, ideal for small spaces. Simple and easy-to-use interface with plug-and-play functionality. Includes a variety of bundled software for music production. Compatible with both Mac and PC operating systems.	High-quality preamps for clear sound recording. USB-C connectivity provides fast and reliable data transfer. Compact and portable design. Easy to use with straightforward controls and setup. Included software package offers great value.

Cons:
Limited to 2 inputs and 2 outputs, which may not be sufficient for more complex recording needs. Build quality may not be as durable as higher-end interfaces. Lacks advanced features like MIDI input/output. Preamps may not offer the highest sound quality compared to more expensive models. No dedicated power supply, relies solely on USB power which can limit performance.	Limited to 2 input channels, which may not suffice for larger setups. No MIDI input/output ports. Phantom power is not individually switchable for each input. Higher price compared to some entry-level audio interfaces. Requires a computer to function, not standalone.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
48 kHz / 16-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
1 Preamp	1
Analog Audio I/O
1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input (Front Panel) 1x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 1x Stereo RCA Coaxial Unbalanced Monitor Output 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)	1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Host Connection
1x USB-B (Class-Compliant)	1x USB-C
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.8 or Later Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit)	macOS Windows
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)

When comparing the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface, several key differences and similarities emerge in terms of features.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) offers superior audio quality with a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit resolution, compared to the M-Audio M-Track Solo's 48 kHz at 16-bit resolution. This higher sampling rate and bit depth in the Scarlett Solo provide a more detailed and accurate representation of the audio signal, making it a better choice for professionals seeking high-fidelity sound.
In terms of analog audio I/O, both interfaces provide 2 inputs and 2 outputs. The Scarlett Solo includes 1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input and 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input on the front panel, along with 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Outputs and 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output. Conversely, the M-Audio M-Track Solo features a combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input and 1x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input on the front panel, with 1x Stereo RCA Coaxial Unbalanced Monitor Output and 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output. The Scarlett Solo's balanced outputs can provide better noise rejection, which is beneficial in professional settings.
Regarding connectivity, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo uses a USB-C host connection, which is more modern and versatile compared to the M-Audio M-Track Solo's USB-B connection. Both interfaces are compatible with macOS and Windows operating systems, but the Scarlett Solo’s support for USB-C can offer more reliable and faster data transfer, as well as broader compatibility with newer devices.
Both interfaces are USB bus-powered, making them equally convenient for mobile setups. However, the Scarlett Solo also supports an optional USB power adapter (not included), providing additional flexibility for power sources.
Overall, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) stands out with its higher sampling rate, modern USB-C connection, and balanced outputs, making it a more robust choice for users requiring professional-grade audio quality and connectivity options. The M-Audio M-Track Solo, while offering adequate features for basic recording needs, is more limited in terms of audio resolution and connectivity.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
48 kHz / 16-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
1 Preamp	1
Built-In Microphone

Input Level Adjustment
2x Knob	2x Knob
Expansion Slots

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface both offer similar basic functionalities but differ in several key areas.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo provides 2 inputs and 2 outputs at a high maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz and 24-bit resolution. This high sampling rate allows for superior audio fidelity, making it well-suited for professional audio recording and production. It includes 1 microphone input, and the input levels can be adjusted via two dedicated knobs. This model does not have built-in DSP or expansion slots, but its high-quality audio performance and USB-C connectivity make it a robust option for musicians and producers looking for high-resolution audio capture.
In contrast, the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface also offers 2 inputs and 2 outputs but at a lower maximum sampling rate of 48 kHz and 16-bit resolution. While this is sufficient for many basic recording needs, it does not match the high-resolution capabilities of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. It includes 1 microphone preamp input and similarly features two knobs for input level adjustment. Like the Focusrite model, the M-Audio interface does not have built-in DSP or expansion slots. Its primary advantage is its affordability and simplicity, making it an accessible choice for beginners or those with less demanding audio requirements.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo stands out with its higher sampling rate and 24-bit audio resolution, making it ideal for more detailed and professional audio work. The M-Audio M-Track Solo, with its lower sampling rate and 16-bit resolution, offers a more budget-friendly option for basic recording tasks. Both interfaces provide essential features like input level adjustment via knobs and lack built-in DSP or expansion slots, but they cater to different levels of audio fidelity and user needs.

Signal Processing
Gain/Trim Range
Mic Inputs: 0 to +54 dB Line/Hi-Z Inputs: -10 to +44 dB	Mic/Line Inputs: Up to +69 dB Hi-Z Inputs: 62 dB

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface cater to different needs and offer varying specifications in terms of gain/trim range, pad, high-pass filter, and solo/mute functionalities.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) boasts a notable gain/trim range, providing up to +69 dB for mic/line inputs and 62 dB for Hi-Z inputs. This wide range allows for capturing a variety of sound sources with clarity and precision. It is designed to accommodate both microphones and instruments with high fidelity, making it a versatile choice for musicians and audio engineers who require a robust and dynamic audio interface.
In contrast, the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface offers a gain/trim range of 0 to +54 dB for mic inputs and -10 to +44 dB for line/Hi-Z inputs. While this range is more limited compared to the Focusrite Scarlett Solo, it still provides adequate amplification for home studio setups and basic recording needs. However, the M-Audio interface lacks additional features such as a pad, high-pass filter, and solo/mute functions, which may limit its flexibility and control in certain recording scenarios.
Overall, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) stands out for its extensive gain/trim range and high-quality input capabilities, making it a more versatile and powerful option for users seeking professional-grade recordings. The M-Audio M-Track Solo, while offering essential functionalities for basic recording, does not include advanced features like a pad, high-pass filter, or solo/mute options, which may be a consideration for users requiring more control and versatility in their audio interface.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input (Front Panel) 1x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 1x Stereo RCA Coaxial Unbalanced Monitor Output 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)	1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Phantom Power
48 V, Selectable On/Off	48 V, Selectable On/Off
Digital Audio I/O

Host Connection
1x USB-B (Class-Compliant)	1x USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0	USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)

Sync I/O

Network I/O

MIDI I/O

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface both serve as entry-level solutions for home recording, but they offer distinct features that cater to different user needs.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) comes with 1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input and 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input on the front panel. For outputs, it includes 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Outputs and 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output also on the front panel. The Scarlett Solo provides 48V phantom power, selectable on/off, making it suitable for condenser microphones. It connects to the host via a USB-C port using the USB 2.0 protocol. This model does not feature any digital audio I/O, sync I/O, network I/O, MIDI I/O, or wireless capabilities.
On the other hand, the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface is equipped with 1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input and 1x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input on the front panel. It offers 1x Stereo RCA Coaxial Unbalanced Monitor Output and 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output on the front panel. Similar to the Scarlett Solo, it also provides 48V phantom power, selectable on/off. The M-Track Solo connects to the host using a USB-B port (class-compliant) with the USB 2.0 protocol. This interface also lacks digital audio I/O, sync I/O, network I/O, MIDI I/O, and wireless functionalities.
In summary, while both interfaces offer similar connectivity options and phantom power, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo features balanced monitor outputs and a USB-C connection, which might appeal to users looking for potentially cleaner audio signals and modern connectivity. The M-Audio M-Track Solo provides a combo input and a more traditional USB-B connection, which could be preferable for users needing simpler integration with older systems or additional input flexibility.

Performance
Frequency Response
Mic, Line, Hi-Z Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.1 dB Monitor Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.1 dB Headphone Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.5 dB	XLR Mic Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB 1/4" Line Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.05 dB 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.15 dB
Maximum Output Level
Line Outputs: +4 dBu	1/4" Line: +16 dBu
Headphone Output Power
60 mW per Channel into 32 Ohms	1/4": 32 mW into 33 Ohms 22 mW into 300 Ohms
Impedance
Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohm (Unbalanced)	XLR Mic Inputs: 3 Kilohms 1/4" Line Inputs: 60 Kilohms 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohms 1/4" Line Outputs: 200 Ohms 1/4" Headphone Outputs: < 50 Ohm
THD+N
Mic Inputs: 0.003% (A-Weighted, Min Gain, at 0 dBu) Line Inputs: 0.002% (A-Weighted, Min Gain, at 0 dBu) Hi-Z Inputs: 0.005% (A-Weighted, Min Gain, at 0 dBu) Monitor Outputs: 0.002% (A-Weighted, at 0 dBu) Headphone Outputs: 0.02% (A-Weighted)	XLR Mic Inputs: -100 dB (at Minimum Gain) 1/4" Line Inputs: -100 dB (at 8 dB Gain) 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: -80 dB (at Minimum Gain) 1/4" Line Outputs: -100 dB (at Minimum Gain) 1/4" Headphone Outputs: -97 dB (at 33 Ohms) -102 dB (at 300 Ohms) Digital A/D Converters: -110 dB Digital D/A Converters: -115 dB
EIN
Mic Inputs: -128 dBu A-Weighted (Max Gain)	XLR Mic Inputs: -127 dBu A-Weighted

When comparing the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface, several key features stand out in terms of frequency response, maximum input and output levels, headphone output power, impedance, dynamic range, Total Harmonic Distortion plus Noise (THD+N), and Equivalent Input Noise (EIN).
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo offers a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz with variations of ±0.06 dB for XLR mic inputs, ±0.05 dB for 1/4" line inputs, and ±0.15 dB for 1/4" Hi-Z inputs. In comparison, the M-Audio M-Track Solo provides a slightly less precise frequency response of ±0.1 dB for mic, line, and Hi-Z inputs, and ±0.5 dB for headphone outputs. This indicates that the Scarlett Solo potentially offers slightly better accuracy in maintaining the integrity of the audio signal across its frequency range.
Regarding maximum input levels, the Scarlett Solo supports up to 9.5 dBu for XLR mic inputs, 22 dBu for 1/4" line inputs, and 12 dBu for 1/4" Hi-Z inputs. On the other hand, the M-Track Solo does not provide specific maximum input levels but does specify a maximum output level of +4 dBu for line outputs, which is lower than the Scarlett Solo's +16 dBu for 1/4" line outputs.
Headphone output power is another area of difference. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo delivers 32 mW into 33 Ohms and 22 mW into 300 Ohms, whereas the M-Audio M-Track Solo offers a higher output power of 60 mW per channel into 32 Ohms. This suggests that the M-Track Solo may provide a stronger headphone output, potentially beneficial for users requiring higher volume levels.
Impedance specifications reveal that the Scarlett Solo offers 3 Kilohms for XLR mic inputs, 60 Kilohms for 1/4" line inputs, and 1 Megohm for 1/4" Hi-Z inputs, with headphone outputs rated at less than 50 Ohms. The M-Track Solo specifies an impedance of 1 Megohm for Hi-Z inputs but does not detail other input impedances.
In terms of dynamic range, the Scarlett Solo excels with 113 dBA for XLR mic and 1/4" line inputs, 112 dBA for 1/4" Hi-Z inputs, and up to 130 dBA for digital D/A converters. The M-Track Solo reports 109 dB (A-Weighted) for mic inputs and monitor outputs, and 100 dB (A-Weighted) for headphone outputs, indicating that the Scarlett Solo has a superior dynamic range overall.
Total Harmonic Distortion plus Noise (THD+N) values for the Scarlett Solo are -100 dB for XLR mic and 1/4" line inputs, -80 dB for 1/4" Hi-Z inputs, and varying values for headphone outputs depending on impedance. The M-Track Solo presents THD+N values of 0.003% for mic inputs, 0.002% for line inputs, 0.005% for Hi-Z inputs, and 0.02% for headphone outputs, showing that both interfaces maintain low levels of distortion, though the Scarlett Solo offers slightly better performance in some areas.
Finally, Equivalent Input Noise (EIN) is -127 dBu A-Weighted for the Scarlett Solo's XLR mic inputs and -128 dBu A-Weighted for the M-Track Solo's mic inputs, indicating that both interfaces are quite similar in this regard, with the M-Track Solo having a marginally better EIN.
Overall, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) tends to offer higher specifications in dynamic range, frequency response accuracy, and output levels, whereas the M-Audio M-Track Solo provides stronger headphone output power. Both interfaces have unique strengths that cater to different user needs.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
48 kHz (AD/DA Conversion)	44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 / 176.4 / 192 kHz
Bit Depths
16-Bit (AD/DA Conversion)	24-Bit
Sync Sources
Internal	Internal

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface offer distinct features tailored to different user needs, particularly in terms of sample rates, bit depths, and overall audio fidelity.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) supports a wide range of sample rates, including 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, 176.4, and 192 kHz, making it highly versatile for various recording scenarios, from standard to high-resolution audio projects. It operates at a 24-bit depth, which ensures high-quality audio recording and playback. The sync source for this interface is internal, providing stable and reliable synchronization during recording and playback sessions.
On the other hand, the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface supports a single sample rate of 48 kHz for both analog-to-digital (AD) and digital-to-analog (DA) conversions. It does not offer sample rate conversion, which could limit its flexibility in different recording environments. The bit depth for the M-Audio M-Track Solo is 16-bit, which is adequate for basic recording tasks but may not capture the same level of detail and dynamic range as the 24-bit depth offered by the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. One notable feature of the M-Audio interface is its zero-latency direct monitoring, which allows users to hear their inputs in real-time without any noticeable delay. Like the Scarlett Solo, the M-Audio M-Track Solo also utilizes an internal sync source for stable performance.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) offers superior sample rate flexibility and higher bit depth, making it a better choice for users seeking high-fidelity recordings. The M-Audio M-Track Solo, while more limited in sample rate and bit depth, provides essential features like zero-latency monitoring, which is beneficial for real-time audio tracking and monitoring. Both interfaces use internal sync sources to ensure reliable operation.

Audio Storage & Playback

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.8 or Later Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit)	macOS Windows

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface are both reliable options for personal audio recording and production, but they differ in several key areas.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation) is OS compatible with both macOS and Windows, and is also mobile app compatible, specifically with iPadOS. This makes it a versatile choice for users who might want to utilize their iPad for mobile recording sessions. The USB-C connectivity ensures fast and reliable data transfer, which is beneficial for latency-sensitive applications such as live monitoring and recording.
On the other hand, the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface supports macOS 10.8 or later and Windows 7 or later (32-/64-bit). It requires an available USB-A port and comes with a USB cable included in the package. Additionally, the M-Audio interface necessitates an internet connection for registration and software/driver downloads, which is an extra step users need to consider for initial setup and updates.
In summary, while both interfaces offer cross-platform compatibility with macOS and Windows, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo extends its functionality to iPadOS, making it more versatile for mobile recording. The M-Audio M-Track Solo, meanwhile, requires an internet connection for setup and is designed for use with a USB-A port, which may be a consideration depending on the user's available hardware and connectivity preferences.

Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)

When comparing the power requirements and consumption of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface, several key differences emerge.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) can be powered through USB bus power or an optional USB power adapter. It also supports an AC/DC power adapter with a requirement of 5 VDC at 900 mA. The power consumption for this interface is specified at 4.5 W, indicating a relatively modest power draw for its operational needs.
In contrast, the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface has a simpler power requirement, relying solely on USB bus power. This streamlined power solution makes it potentially more convenient for users who prefer not having to deal with additional power adapters or specific voltage requirements.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo offers flexibility in power options with support for USB bus power, a USB power adapter, and an AC/DC power adapter. It has a specific power consumption rate of 4.5 W. On the other hand, the M-Audio M-Track Solo maintains a straightforward approach with its exclusive reliance on USB bus power.

Physical
Dimensions
6.4 x 4.5 x 2.1" / 16.3 x 11.4 x 5.3 cm	5.63 x 3.78 x 1.79" / 14.3 x 9.6 x 4.55 cm
Weight
0.7 lb / 0.3 kg	0.8 lb / 363.0 g

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface each offer distinct features in terms of dimensions and weight.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) has dimensions of 5.63 x 3.78 x 1.79 inches (14.3 x 9.6 x 4.55 cm), making it relatively compact. It weighs 0.8 lb (363.0 g), which contributes to its portability and ease of use, especially in mobile recording setups or small studios.
On the other hand, the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface is slightly larger, with dimensions of 6.4 x 4.5 x 2.1 inches (16.3 x 11.4 x 5.3 cm). Despite its larger size, it is marginally lighter, weighing 0.7 lb (0.3 kg). This makes it a good option for users who might prioritize a bit more surface area for control knobs and inputs without significantly increasing the weight.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo is more compact and slightly heavier, which could appeal to users looking for a smaller footprint and robust build. Conversely, the M-Audio M-Track Solo offers a larger surface area while keeping the weight lower, which might be preferable for users who want more space for interface controls without adding much to their gear's weight.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
1.155 lb	1.305 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
8 x 6 x 3.7"	7.2 x 6.1 x 2.5"

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface both serve as valuable tools for audio recording and production, but they differ in several aspects related to their physical specifications.
Starting with the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation), it has a package weight of 1.305 lb, making it slightly heavier than the M-Audio M-Track Solo, which weighs 1.155 lb. This difference in weight might be minor, but it could be a consideration for users who prioritize portability and ease of transportation.
In terms of dimensions, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo measures 7.2 x 6.1 x 2.5 inches. In contrast, the M-Audio M-Track Solo is slightly larger with box dimensions of 8 x 6 x 3.7 inches. The larger size of the M-Audio M-Track Solo may suggest a more robust build or additional features, but it also means it will take up more space on a desktop or in a bag.
Both audio interfaces are designed to be compact and user-friendly, but the Focusrite Scarlett Solo's slightly smaller and lighter build might appeal more to users with limited studio space or those who need a more portable solution. On the other hand, the M-Audio M-Track Solo's larger size might be indicative of a potentially more durable design or additional connectivity options.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation) is slightly lighter and more compact compared to the M-Audio M-Track Solo. These differences in weight and dimensions could influence a user’s decision based on their specific needs for portability and space management in their recording setup.