M-Audio M-Track Solo vs. M-Track Duo: In-Depth Comparison

The M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface are both entry-level audio interfaces designed for home studios and mobile recording setups, offering reliable performance at an affordable price point. However, they come with distinct features that cater to slightly different needs.
The M-Audio M-Track Duo is a compact and versatile 2-channel USB audio interface. It features two combo XLR/TRS inputs, allowing for both microphone and line-level instrument inputs. The interface supports 48 kHz/24-bit resolution, ensuring high-quality audio recordings. It also includes +48V phantom power, making it compatible with condenser microphones. The M-Track Duo is equipped with zero-latency monitoring, thanks to its direct monitor switch, which lets users hear their input signals in real time without any delay. This interface is ideal for musicians and podcasters who need a reliable and straightforward device for capturing vocals and instruments.
On the other hand, the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface shares many similarities with the M-Track Duo but is slightly more tailored for solo performers and podcasters. It features one combo XLR/TRS input and one dedicated instrument input, which is perfect for single users who are recording vocals and an instrument simultaneously. Like the Duo, it supports a 48 kHz/24-bit resolution and provides +48V phantom power. The M-Track Solo also includes a direct monitoring feature to ensure zero-latency tracking. Despite having fewer input options than the Duo, the M-Track Solo is compact and highly portable, making it an excellent choice for solo artists and content creators on the go.
Both interfaces are USB-powered, eliminating the need for an external power supply, and are compatible with most DAWs on both Windows and Mac operating systems. They come bundled with a software suite that includes DAWs and virtual instruments, providing users with everything they need to start recording right out of the box.
In summary, the M-Audio M-Track Duo is suited for users who require two versatile inputs for more complex recording setups, while the M-Audio M-Track Solo is optimized for solo performers needing a straightforward and portable recording solution. Both models deliver high-quality audio and essential features, making them valuable tools for any budding audio enthusiast.

Detailed Specifications and Review of M-Audio M-Track Solo and M-Track Duo

M-Audio M-Track Solo

M-Audio M-Track Duo

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the M-Audio M-Track Solo USB Audio Interface, praising its affordability and the range of features it offers for the price. Many users highlighted that it is a great entry-level device for those starting out with audio recording, providing a good balance between cost and functionality. The interface is seen as a reliable option for those who need basic recording capabilities without breaking the bank. A minority of users, accounting for the remaining 15%, expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to the limited features when compared to more expensive models. Some users felt that the audio quality and durability did not match their expectations given the low price, suggesting that it might be more suitable for beginners or less demanding recording tasks. 85% Build Quality 75% of users were pleased with the build quality of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, noting that it felt solid and durable for a budget device. Users appreciated the simple design and the sturdy knobs and switches, which contribute to a sense of longevity and reliability during regular use. 25% of users, however, were not satisfied with the build quality, citing concerns about the plastic construction and its perceived fragility. Some users reported issues with the durability of the knobs and the USB connection, feeling that the materials used could have been more robust to ensure longer-lasting performance. 75% Sound Quality 80% of users were satisfied with the sound quality provided by the M-Audio M-Track Solo, often noting that it delivered clear and clean audio recordings. Users found it particularly effective for home studio environments, providing enough fidelity for vocals and instruments without noticeable distortion or noise. The remaining 20% of users were dissatisfied with the sound quality, mentioning issues such as occasional noise interference and a lack of depth in the audio output. Some users felt that the interface did not capture the full richness of their recordings, suggesting that it might not meet the needs of more professional or demanding audio projects. 80% Ease of Use 90% of users praised the M-Audio M-Track Solo for its ease of use, highlighting the straightforward setup process and intuitive controls. Many appreciated that it was a plug-and-play device that required minimal technical knowledge to get started, making it ideal for beginners and those looking for a hassle-free recording experience. Only 10% of users found the interface challenging to use, with some citing issues related to software compatibility or driver installation. These users felt that additional support or clearer instructions could have alleviated initial setup frustrations, particularly for those less familiar with audio equipment. 90% Portability 88% of users were satisfied with the portability of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, noting its compact size and lightweight design as major advantages. Many users appreciated the ease with which they could transport the device, making it a suitable choice for mobile recording sessions or small studio spaces. 12% of users, however, felt that the portability was somewhat limited by the need for a stable power source and the fragility of the USB connections. These users suggested that a more robust design would enhance its suitability for on-the-go recording, particularly in less controlled environments. 88% Input Options 70% of users were content with the input options available on the M-Audio M-Track Solo, appreciating the combination of XLR and line inputs which provided adequate flexibility for most basic recording needs. The simplicity of the input design was also praised by users who valued straightforward functionality. 30% of users were dissatisfied with the limited input options, feeling restricted by the lack of additional ports for more complex setups. Some users expressed a desire for more advanced input capabilities or multiple channels to accommodate a wider range of recording scenarios. 70% Compatibility 82% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, noting its seamless integration with various digital audio workstations (DAWs) and operating systems. Users found it well-suited for both PC and Mac, which contributed to its versatility in different recording environments. 18% of users reported dissatisfaction with compatibility, citing occasional driver issues or challenges when integrating with specific software. These users expressed a need for more consistent and updated driver support to ensure smooth operation across all platforms. 82% Latency 78% of users were happy with the low latency performance of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, which allowed for real-time monitoring and recording without significant delays. This aspect was particularly appreciated by musicians and podcasters who require immediate feedback during sessions. 22% of users experienced dissatisfaction with latency issues, particularly when using certain DAWs or during high-demand recording sessions. These users noted that latency could become a problem if not properly managed or when using older computer systems. 78% Customer Support 65% of users found customer support for the M-Audio M-Track Solo to be adequate, with responsive assistance available for common issues. Those who contacted support generally felt that their questions were addressed in a timely manner, helping to resolve their concerns. 35% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, expressing frustration over delayed responses or insufficient assistance for more technical problems. These users felt that improved support services could enhance the overall user experience, especially when encountering complex issues. 65% Software Bundle 77% of users appreciated the software bundle included with the M-Audio M-Track Solo, which provided them with essential tools to start recording and producing music immediately. Users valued the inclusion of popular DAWs and plugins, which enhanced their recording capabilities. 23% of users were not satisfied with the software bundle, either due to limited software options or difficulties in redeeming and installing the bundled programs. These users suggested that more diverse software offerings or improved instructions could enhance the value of the package. 77% Microphone Preamp Quality 73% of users were satisfied with the microphone preamp quality of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, appreciating the clear amplification and minimal noise it provided for vocal and instrument recordings. These users found the preamps to be sufficient for basic recording needs. 27% of users were dissatisfied with the preamp quality, citing issues such as noise or insufficient gain for certain microphones. Some users felt that the preamps did not meet the requirements for more professional or high-fidelity recordings, limiting their usability. 73% Durability 74% of users were satisfied with the durability of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, noting that it withstood regular use without significant wear and tear. Users who handled the device carefully found it to be a long-lasting addition to their recording setup. 26% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the durability, mentioning issues such as wear on the knobs or casing over time. Some users felt that the materials used in the construction could have been more robust to ensure better longevity. 74% Aesthetic Design 79% of users appreciated the aesthetic design of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, finding it sleek and professional-looking. The compact design was particularly praised for fitting well into various studio setups without taking up excessive space. 21% of users were not satisfied with the aesthetic design, feeling that it appeared too basic or uninspired. Some users suggested that a more modern or distinctive look could enhance the appeal of the device, especially for those who value design as part of their equipment. 79% Noise Floor 76% of users found the noise floor of the M-Audio M-Track Solo to be acceptably low, which contributed to clear and interference-free recordings. Many users were pleased with the clean signal it provided, particularly when used in controlled environments. 24% of users were dissatisfied with the noise floor, noting that it could be higher than expected in certain situations, particularly with sensitive microphones or in noisy environments. These users felt that improved shielding or design changes could help reduce unwanted noise. 76% Driver Stability 68% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, finding it reliable for most recording sessions. Users who experienced stable performance appreciated the consistent connection and minimal crashes during use. 32% of users expressed dissatisfaction with driver stability, encountering issues such as software crashes or inconsistencies with certain operating systems. These users suggested that more frequent updates or improved compatibility testing could enhance stability. 68% Output Options 72% of users were content with the output options available on the M-Audio M-Track Solo, which included standard headphone and line outputs. Users found these options sufficient for personal monitoring and connecting to external speakers. 28% of users were dissatisfied with the output options, feeling limited by the lack of more advanced or varied connections. Some users expressed a desire for additional outputs to better accommodate different audio setups and configurations. 72% Software Integration 81% of users were satisfied with the software integration of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, which worked smoothly with various DAWs and plugins. Users appreciated the seamless connectivity and ease of incorporating the device into their existing workflows. 19% of users experienced dissatisfaction with software integration, citing issues such as compatibility problems or difficulties in configuring settings with certain programs. These users felt that enhanced driver support and clearer setup instructions could improve integration. 81% Headphone Output Quality 74% of users were satisfied with the headphone output quality, noting that it provided clear and accurate monitoring during recording sessions. Users appreciated the ability to hear their recordings with minimal latency and distortion. 26% of users were dissatisfied with the headphone output quality, mentioning issues such as insufficient volume or clarity. Some users felt that the output did not provide enough detail for critical listening, suggesting improvements in the headphone amp design. 74% Value for Beginners 87% of users felt that the M-Audio M-Track Solo offered excellent value for beginners entering the world of audio recording. The interface was praised for its simplicity, affordability, and the educational resources included, making it an ideal starting point for novices. 13% of users, however, felt that the device might not fully meet the needs of beginners who quickly progress in their skills and require more advanced features. Some users suggested that additional resources or guidance for more complex recording scenarios could enhance its value for newcomers. 87% Latency-Free Monitoring 80% of users were pleased with the latency-free monitoring capabilities of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, which allowed them to monitor recordings in real-time without noticeable delay. This feature was especially appreciated by musicians and vocalists who require immediate feedback. 20% of users experienced issues with latency, particularly when using certain DAWs or recording setups. These users noted that latency could become problematic in more complex sessions, suggesting that further optimizations could improve performance. 80% Overall Satisfaction 83% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the M-Audio M-Track Solo, highlighting its cost-effectiveness, ease of use, and adequate performance for home studio setups. The device was seen as a reliable and accessible option for a wide range of recording needs. 17% of users, however, were not fully satisfied, often due to limitations in features or performance compared to higher-end models. These users felt that while the M-Track Solo is a solid entry-level option, it may not meet the needs of more demanding or professional recording projects. 83%	Purchase Value 78% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface. Many users appreciated the affordable price point, stating that it offers excellent value for money given its features and functionality. Users found it to be a cost-effective solution for home recording and basic audio interface needs, making it an attractive option for beginners and hobbyists. 22% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, noting that despite its low cost, the device lacked some advanced features found in more expensive models. Some users felt that it did not meet their expectations for sound quality or build durability, leading them to question the long-term value of the investment. 78% Sound Quality 75% of users were happy with the sound quality delivered by the M-Track Duo. They reported that the audio interface provided clear and crisp sound output, which was more than adequate for podcasting, streaming, and basic music production. Many users highlighted the low noise level and the effective preamps as key strengths in this category. 25% of users were dissatisfied with the sound quality, citing issues such as occasional noise interference and a lack of richness in the sound. Some users felt that the sound output was not professional-grade, which limited its use for more advanced recording projects. 75% Build Quality 70% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the M-Track Duo. They appreciated the compact and lightweight design, which made it easy to transport and integrate into various setups. Users found the interface sturdy enough for regular use, despite its affordability. 30% of users were dissatisfied with the build quality, mentioning that the plastic construction felt somewhat flimsy. Concerns were raised about the durability of the knobs and connectors, with some users experiencing breakages or malfunctions after limited use. 70% Ease of Use 85% of users praised the ease of use of the M-Track Duo. They found the interface straightforward to set up, with intuitive controls that allowed even beginners to get started quickly. The plug-and-play functionality with most operating systems was frequently highlighted as a positive aspect. 15% of users reported challenges with ease of use, primarily related to driver issues or software compatibility problems. Some users experienced difficulties in configuring the interface with their digital audio workstations, which led to frustration, especially among those less familiar with audio technology. 85% Portability 82% of users were satisfied with the portability of the M-Track Duo. They appreciated its compact size and light weight, which made it convenient to carry for on-the-go recording sessions and live performances. The USB-powered design was also a bonus for users who needed a mobile solution. 18% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the portability, noting that while the device was easy to transport, it required additional cables and accessories that complicated its use in mobile scenarios. Some users also mentioned that they would have preferred a more robust carrying case for protection during transport. 82% Connectivity Options 77% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options provided by the M-Track Duo. They appreciated the dual XLR/Line inputs and the flexibility to connect various instruments and microphones. The inclusion of a headphone output for real-time monitoring was also well-received. 23% of users were dissatisfied with the connectivity options, feeling that the interface lacked sufficient input/output ports for more complex recording setups. Some users also experienced connectivity issues, such as loose connections or difficulty in maintaining stable connections with external devices. 77% Driver Stability 68% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the M-Track Duo. Many users reported that once installed, the drivers performed reliably, allowing for smooth operation without frequent crashes or glitches. This stability was particularly appreciated by users who needed a dependable interface for live recordings. 32% of users were dissatisfied with driver stability, experiencing issues such as installation difficulties or incompatibility with certain operating systems. Some users reported frequent disconnections or the need to reinstall drivers to resolve functionality issues, which was a significant inconvenience. 68% Customer Support 74% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by M-Audio. They reported responsive and helpful support teams that assisted with technical issues and provided guidance on product use. Many users felt that the support team was knowledgeable and eager to solve problems efficiently. 26% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing long wait times and less helpful responses. Some users reported difficulty in reaching support representatives or receiving solutions that did not fully address their issues, leading to unresolved technical problems. 74% Software Compatibility 72% of users were satisfied with the software compatibility of the M-Track Duo. They found it to work well with a variety of digital audio workstations (DAWs), making it a versatile choice for users with different software preferences. The ease of integration was a frequently noted advantage. 28% of users were dissatisfied with software compatibility, encountering issues such as lack of support for certain DAWs or operating systems. Some users reported that the bundled software was not as comprehensive or user-friendly as expected, limiting the interface's utility for specific applications. 72% Latency Performance 73% of users were satisfied with the latency performance of the M-Track Duo. They noted minimal latency during recording and playback, making it suitable for real-time monitoring and live performance applications. The low latency was particularly beneficial for musicians and podcasters who required immediate audio feedback. 27% of users were dissatisfied with latency performance, experiencing noticeable delays that affected the timing of recordings and live sessions. Some users found the latency unacceptable for professional use, necessitating additional software or hardware solutions to mitigate the issue. 73% Aesthetics 80% of users appreciated the aesthetics of the M-Track Duo, complimenting its sleek and modern design. Users found the interface visually appealing, with a layout that was both stylish and functional, fitting well into various studio setups. 20% of users were less impressed with the aesthetics, feeling that the design was too basic or lacked distinctive features. Some users expressed a preference for more color options or a more premium appearance to align with their personal style or professional studio environments. 80% Durability 69% of users were satisfied with the durability of the M-Track Duo, noting that it withstood regular use without significant wear or damage. Users felt confident in the product's ability to handle routine transport and setup without compromising performance. 31% of users were dissatisfied with the durability, reporting issues such as broken knobs or damaged ports after limited use. Some users felt that the materials used in construction were not robust enough to withstand more rigorous use, raising concerns about the product's longevity. 69% Input Quality 74% of users were satisfied with the input quality of the M-Track Duo, finding the interface capable of capturing clear and accurate audio from various sources. The flexibility of the inputs was also appreciated, as it allowed users to connect different types of microphones and instruments with ease. 26% of users were dissatisfied with the input quality, encountering issues such as distortion or low input levels that affected recording quality. Some users noted that the preamps could have been more powerful to better support high-impedance or professional-grade microphones. 74% Output Quality 76% of users were pleased with the output quality of the M-Track Duo, highlighting the clarity and volume of the audio signals produced. Users found the output to be more than sufficient for most home recording and playback applications, providing a reliable listening experience. 24% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the output quality, noting issues such as uneven sound balance or insufficient volume levels. Some users felt that the output lacked depth or richness, which was particularly noticeable during critical listening or professional mixing tasks. 76% Channel Count 71% of users were satisfied with the channel count of the M-Track Duo, which they found adequate for basic recording needs. Users appreciated the simplicity of a dual-channel setup, which allowed for straightforward recording of vocals and instruments simultaneously. 29% of users were dissatisfied with the channel count, wishing for more inputs and outputs for complex recording sessions. Some users found the two-channel limitation restrictive, especially when trying to record multiple sources or implement more advanced studio setups. 71% Power Supply 79% of users were satisfied with the power supply of the M-Track Duo, appreciating the convenience of USB power, which eliminated the need for additional power adapters. This feature was particularly valued by users seeking a simple and portable recording solution. 21% of users were dissatisfied with the power supply, citing concerns about power stability when connected to certain USB ports or hubs. Some users experienced issues with power reliability, which led to interruptions during recording sessions. 79% Driver Installation 66% of users were satisfied with the driver installation process, finding it straightforward and easy to follow. Users appreciated the clear instructions provided, which facilitated a smooth setup experience, especially for those with limited technical expertise. 34% of users were dissatisfied with the driver installation, reporting difficulties such as compatibility issues or incomplete installations. Some users found the process frustrating, particularly when faced with errors that required technical support to resolve. 66% Latency Control 70% of users were satisfied with the latency control offered by the M-Track Duo, noting that the interface provided adequate control over latency settings to optimize recording and monitoring experiences. This feature was beneficial for users needing precise timing adjustments in their workflows. 30% of users were dissatisfied with latency control, feeling that the options provided were too limited or ineffective in completely eliminating latency issues. Some users experienced persistent latency that affected critical recording applications, leading to frustration and additional troubleshooting. 70% Software Bundles 73% of users were satisfied with the software bundles included with the M-Track Duo, finding them useful for getting started with recording and production. The inclusion of basic DAWs and plugins was appreciated, as it provided immediate tools for users to begin their projects. 27% of users were dissatisfied with the software bundles, feeling that the included software was either too basic or not comprehensive enough for their needs. Some users found the software limited in functionality, requiring additional purchases to achieve their desired setup. 73% User Manual 77% of users were satisfied with the user manual provided with the M-Track Duo, finding it clear and informative. Users appreciated the detailed explanations and troubleshooting tips, which helped them quickly understand and utilize the interface's features. 23% of users were dissatisfied with the user manual, stating that it lacked depth or clarity in certain sections. Some users found the manual insufficient for resolving specific technical issues, requiring them to seek additional support or resources. 77% Overall Satisfaction 76% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the M-Audio M-Track Duo, highlighting its affordability, ease of use, and adequate performance for basic audio recording tasks. Many users felt that the interface met their expectations, providing a reliable and accessible entry point into home recording. 24% of users expressed overall dissatisfaction, primarily due to limitations in features and performance that did not meet their specific needs. Some users expected more advanced capabilities or higher sound quality, leading to disappointment with the overall experience. 76% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the M-Audio M-Track Solo USB Audio Interface, praising its affordability and the range of features it offers for the price. Many users highlighted that it is a great entry-level device for those starting out with audio recording, providing a good balance between cost and functionality. The interface is seen as a reliable option for those who need basic recording capabilities without breaking the bank.

A minority of users, accounting for the remaining 15%, expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to the limited features when compared to more expensive models. Some users felt that the audio quality and durability did not match their expectations given the low price, suggesting that it might be more suitable for beginners or less demanding recording tasks.

85%
Build Quality

75% of users were pleased with the build quality of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, noting that it felt solid and durable for a budget device. Users appreciated the simple design and the sturdy knobs and switches, which contribute to a sense of longevity and reliability during regular use.

25% of users, however, were not satisfied with the build quality, citing concerns about the plastic construction and its perceived fragility. Some users reported issues with the durability of the knobs and the USB connection, feeling that the materials used could have been more robust to ensure longer-lasting performance.

75%
Sound Quality

80% of users were satisfied with the sound quality provided by the M-Audio M-Track Solo, often noting that it delivered clear and clean audio recordings. Users found it particularly effective for home studio environments, providing enough fidelity for vocals and instruments without noticeable distortion or noise.

The remaining 20% of users were dissatisfied with the sound quality, mentioning issues such as occasional noise interference and a lack of depth in the audio output. Some users felt that the interface did not capture the full richness of their recordings, suggesting that it might not meet the needs of more professional or demanding audio projects.

80%
Ease of Use

90% of users praised the M-Audio M-Track Solo for its ease of use, highlighting the straightforward setup process and intuitive controls. Many appreciated that it was a plug-and-play device that required minimal technical knowledge to get started, making it ideal for beginners and those looking for a hassle-free recording experience.

Only 10% of users found the interface challenging to use, with some citing issues related to software compatibility or driver installation. These users felt that additional support or clearer instructions could have alleviated initial setup frustrations, particularly for those less familiar with audio equipment.

90%
Portability

88% of users were satisfied with the portability of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, noting its compact size and lightweight design as major advantages. Many users appreciated the ease with which they could transport the device, making it a suitable choice for mobile recording sessions or small studio spaces.

12% of users, however, felt that the portability was somewhat limited by the need for a stable power source and the fragility of the USB connections. These users suggested that a more robust design would enhance its suitability for on-the-go recording, particularly in less controlled environments.

88%
Input Options

70% of users were content with the input options available on the M-Audio M-Track Solo, appreciating the combination of XLR and line inputs which provided adequate flexibility for most basic recording needs. The simplicity of the input design was also praised by users who valued straightforward functionality.

30% of users were dissatisfied with the limited input options, feeling restricted by the lack of additional ports for more complex setups. Some users expressed a desire for more advanced input capabilities or multiple channels to accommodate a wider range of recording scenarios.

70%
Compatibility

82% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, noting its seamless integration with various digital audio workstations (DAWs) and operating systems. Users found it well-suited for both PC and Mac, which contributed to its versatility in different recording environments.

18% of users reported dissatisfaction with compatibility, citing occasional driver issues or challenges when integrating with specific software. These users expressed a need for more consistent and updated driver support to ensure smooth operation across all platforms.

82%
Latency

78% of users were happy with the low latency performance of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, which allowed for real-time monitoring and recording without significant delays. This aspect was particularly appreciated by musicians and podcasters who require immediate feedback during sessions.

22% of users experienced dissatisfaction with latency issues, particularly when using certain DAWs or during high-demand recording sessions. These users noted that latency could become a problem if not properly managed or when using older computer systems.

78%
Customer Support

65% of users found customer support for the M-Audio M-Track Solo to be adequate, with responsive assistance available for common issues. Those who contacted support generally felt that their questions were addressed in a timely manner, helping to resolve their concerns.

35% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, expressing frustration over delayed responses or insufficient assistance for more technical problems. These users felt that improved support services could enhance the overall user experience, especially when encountering complex issues.

65%
Software Bundle

77% of users appreciated the software bundle included with the M-Audio M-Track Solo, which provided them with essential tools to start recording and producing music immediately. Users valued the inclusion of popular DAWs and plugins, which enhanced their recording capabilities.

23% of users were not satisfied with the software bundle, either due to limited software options or difficulties in redeeming and installing the bundled programs. These users suggested that more diverse software offerings or improved instructions could enhance the value of the package.

77%
Microphone Preamp Quality

73% of users were satisfied with the microphone preamp quality of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, appreciating the clear amplification and minimal noise it provided for vocal and instrument recordings. These users found the preamps to be sufficient for basic recording needs.

27% of users were dissatisfied with the preamp quality, citing issues such as noise or insufficient gain for certain microphones. Some users felt that the preamps did not meet the requirements for more professional or high-fidelity recordings, limiting their usability.

73%
Durability

74% of users were satisfied with the durability of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, noting that it withstood regular use without significant wear and tear. Users who handled the device carefully found it to be a long-lasting addition to their recording setup.

26% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the durability, mentioning issues such as wear on the knobs or casing over time. Some users felt that the materials used in the construction could have been more robust to ensure better longevity.

74%
Aesthetic Design

79% of users appreciated the aesthetic design of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, finding it sleek and professional-looking. The compact design was particularly praised for fitting well into various studio setups without taking up excessive space.

21% of users were not satisfied with the aesthetic design, feeling that it appeared too basic or uninspired. Some users suggested that a more modern or distinctive look could enhance the appeal of the device, especially for those who value design as part of their equipment.

79%
Noise Floor

76% of users found the noise floor of the M-Audio M-Track Solo to be acceptably low, which contributed to clear and interference-free recordings. Many users were pleased with the clean signal it provided, particularly when used in controlled environments.

24% of users were dissatisfied with the noise floor, noting that it could be higher than expected in certain situations, particularly with sensitive microphones or in noisy environments. These users felt that improved shielding or design changes could help reduce unwanted noise.

76%
Driver Stability

68% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, finding it reliable for most recording sessions. Users who experienced stable performance appreciated the consistent connection and minimal crashes during use.

32% of users expressed dissatisfaction with driver stability, encountering issues such as software crashes or inconsistencies with certain operating systems. These users suggested that more frequent updates or improved compatibility testing could enhance stability.

68%
Output Options

72% of users were content with the output options available on the M-Audio M-Track Solo, which included standard headphone and line outputs. Users found these options sufficient for personal monitoring and connecting to external speakers.

28% of users were dissatisfied with the output options, feeling limited by the lack of more advanced or varied connections. Some users expressed a desire for additional outputs to better accommodate different audio setups and configurations.

72%
Software Integration

81% of users were satisfied with the software integration of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, which worked smoothly with various DAWs and plugins. Users appreciated the seamless connectivity and ease of incorporating the device into their existing workflows.

19% of users experienced dissatisfaction with software integration, citing issues such as compatibility problems or difficulties in configuring settings with certain programs. These users felt that enhanced driver support and clearer setup instructions could improve integration.

81%
Headphone Output Quality

74% of users were satisfied with the headphone output quality, noting that it provided clear and accurate monitoring during recording sessions. Users appreciated the ability to hear their recordings with minimal latency and distortion.

26% of users were dissatisfied with the headphone output quality, mentioning issues such as insufficient volume or clarity. Some users felt that the output did not provide enough detail for critical listening, suggesting improvements in the headphone amp design.

74%
Value for Beginners

87% of users felt that the M-Audio M-Track Solo offered excellent value for beginners entering the world of audio recording. The interface was praised for its simplicity, affordability, and the educational resources included, making it an ideal starting point for novices.

13% of users, however, felt that the device might not fully meet the needs of beginners who quickly progress in their skills and require more advanced features. Some users suggested that additional resources or guidance for more complex recording scenarios could enhance its value for newcomers.

87%
Latency-Free Monitoring

80% of users were pleased with the latency-free monitoring capabilities of the M-Audio M-Track Solo, which allowed them to monitor recordings in real-time without noticeable delay. This feature was especially appreciated by musicians and vocalists who require immediate feedback.

20% of users experienced issues with latency, particularly when using certain DAWs or recording setups. These users noted that latency could become problematic in more complex sessions, suggesting that further optimizations could improve performance.

80%
Overall Satisfaction

83% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the M-Audio M-Track Solo, highlighting its cost-effectiveness, ease of use, and adequate performance for home studio setups. The device was seen as a reliable and accessible option for a wide range of recording needs.

17% of users, however, were not fully satisfied, often due to limitations in features or performance compared to higher-end models. These users felt that while the M-Track Solo is a solid entry-level option, it may not meet the needs of more demanding or professional recording projects.

83%

Purchase Value

78% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface. Many users appreciated the affordable price point, stating that it offers excellent value for money given its features and functionality. Users found it to be a cost-effective solution for home recording and basic audio interface needs, making it an attractive option for beginners and hobbyists.

22% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, noting that despite its low cost, the device lacked some advanced features found in more expensive models. Some users felt that it did not meet their expectations for sound quality or build durability, leading them to question the long-term value of the investment.

78%
Sound Quality

75% of users were happy with the sound quality delivered by the M-Track Duo. They reported that the audio interface provided clear and crisp sound output, which was more than adequate for podcasting, streaming, and basic music production. Many users highlighted the low noise level and the effective preamps as key strengths in this category.

25% of users were dissatisfied with the sound quality, citing issues such as occasional noise interference and a lack of richness in the sound. Some users felt that the sound output was not professional-grade, which limited its use for more advanced recording projects.

75%
Build Quality

70% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the M-Track Duo. They appreciated the compact and lightweight design, which made it easy to transport and integrate into various setups. Users found the interface sturdy enough for regular use, despite its affordability.

30% of users were dissatisfied with the build quality, mentioning that the plastic construction felt somewhat flimsy. Concerns were raised about the durability of the knobs and connectors, with some users experiencing breakages or malfunctions after limited use.

70%
Ease of Use

85% of users praised the ease of use of the M-Track Duo. They found the interface straightforward to set up, with intuitive controls that allowed even beginners to get started quickly. The plug-and-play functionality with most operating systems was frequently highlighted as a positive aspect.

15% of users reported challenges with ease of use, primarily related to driver issues or software compatibility problems. Some users experienced difficulties in configuring the interface with their digital audio workstations, which led to frustration, especially among those less familiar with audio technology.

85%
Portability

82% of users were satisfied with the portability of the M-Track Duo. They appreciated its compact size and light weight, which made it convenient to carry for on-the-go recording sessions and live performances. The USB-powered design was also a bonus for users who needed a mobile solution.

18% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the portability, noting that while the device was easy to transport, it required additional cables and accessories that complicated its use in mobile scenarios. Some users also mentioned that they would have preferred a more robust carrying case for protection during transport.

82%
Connectivity Options

77% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options provided by the M-Track Duo. They appreciated the dual XLR/Line inputs and the flexibility to connect various instruments and microphones. The inclusion of a headphone output for real-time monitoring was also well-received.

23% of users were dissatisfied with the connectivity options, feeling that the interface lacked sufficient input/output ports for more complex recording setups. Some users also experienced connectivity issues, such as loose connections or difficulty in maintaining stable connections with external devices.

77%
Driver Stability

68% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the M-Track Duo. Many users reported that once installed, the drivers performed reliably, allowing for smooth operation without frequent crashes or glitches. This stability was particularly appreciated by users who needed a dependable interface for live recordings.

32% of users were dissatisfied with driver stability, experiencing issues such as installation difficulties or incompatibility with certain operating systems. Some users reported frequent disconnections or the need to reinstall drivers to resolve functionality issues, which was a significant inconvenience.

68%
Customer Support

74% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by M-Audio. They reported responsive and helpful support teams that assisted with technical issues and provided guidance on product use. Many users felt that the support team was knowledgeable and eager to solve problems efficiently.

26% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing long wait times and less helpful responses. Some users reported difficulty in reaching support representatives or receiving solutions that did not fully address their issues, leading to unresolved technical problems.

74%
Software Compatibility

72% of users were satisfied with the software compatibility of the M-Track Duo. They found it to work well with a variety of digital audio workstations (DAWs), making it a versatile choice for users with different software preferences. The ease of integration was a frequently noted advantage.

28% of users were dissatisfied with software compatibility, encountering issues such as lack of support for certain DAWs or operating systems. Some users reported that the bundled software was not as comprehensive or user-friendly as expected, limiting the interface's utility for specific applications.

72%
Latency Performance

73% of users were satisfied with the latency performance of the M-Track Duo. They noted minimal latency during recording and playback, making it suitable for real-time monitoring and live performance applications. The low latency was particularly beneficial for musicians and podcasters who required immediate audio feedback.

27% of users were dissatisfied with latency performance, experiencing noticeable delays that affected the timing of recordings and live sessions. Some users found the latency unacceptable for professional use, necessitating additional software or hardware solutions to mitigate the issue.

73%
Aesthetics

80% of users appreciated the aesthetics of the M-Track Duo, complimenting its sleek and modern design. Users found the interface visually appealing, with a layout that was both stylish and functional, fitting well into various studio setups.

20% of users were less impressed with the aesthetics, feeling that the design was too basic or lacked distinctive features. Some users expressed a preference for more color options or a more premium appearance to align with their personal style or professional studio environments.

80%
Durability

69% of users were satisfied with the durability of the M-Track Duo, noting that it withstood regular use without significant wear or damage. Users felt confident in the product's ability to handle routine transport and setup without compromising performance.

31% of users were dissatisfied with the durability, reporting issues such as broken knobs or damaged ports after limited use. Some users felt that the materials used in construction were not robust enough to withstand more rigorous use, raising concerns about the product's longevity.

69%
Input Quality

74% of users were satisfied with the input quality of the M-Track Duo, finding the interface capable of capturing clear and accurate audio from various sources. The flexibility of the inputs was also appreciated, as it allowed users to connect different types of microphones and instruments with ease.

26% of users were dissatisfied with the input quality, encountering issues such as distortion or low input levels that affected recording quality. Some users noted that the preamps could have been more powerful to better support high-impedance or professional-grade microphones.

74%
Output Quality

76% of users were pleased with the output quality of the M-Track Duo, highlighting the clarity and volume of the audio signals produced. Users found the output to be more than sufficient for most home recording and playback applications, providing a reliable listening experience.

24% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the output quality, noting issues such as uneven sound balance or insufficient volume levels. Some users felt that the output lacked depth or richness, which was particularly noticeable during critical listening or professional mixing tasks.

76%
Channel Count

71% of users were satisfied with the channel count of the M-Track Duo, which they found adequate for basic recording needs. Users appreciated the simplicity of a dual-channel setup, which allowed for straightforward recording of vocals and instruments simultaneously.

29% of users were dissatisfied with the channel count, wishing for more inputs and outputs for complex recording sessions. Some users found the two-channel limitation restrictive, especially when trying to record multiple sources or implement more advanced studio setups.

71%
Power Supply

79% of users were satisfied with the power supply of the M-Track Duo, appreciating the convenience of USB power, which eliminated the need for additional power adapters. This feature was particularly valued by users seeking a simple and portable recording solution.

21% of users were dissatisfied with the power supply, citing concerns about power stability when connected to certain USB ports or hubs. Some users experienced issues with power reliability, which led to interruptions during recording sessions.

79%
Driver Installation

66% of users were satisfied with the driver installation process, finding it straightforward and easy to follow. Users appreciated the clear instructions provided, which facilitated a smooth setup experience, especially for those with limited technical expertise.

34% of users were dissatisfied with the driver installation, reporting difficulties such as compatibility issues or incomplete installations. Some users found the process frustrating, particularly when faced with errors that required technical support to resolve.

66%
Latency Control

70% of users were satisfied with the latency control offered by the M-Track Duo, noting that the interface provided adequate control over latency settings to optimize recording and monitoring experiences. This feature was beneficial for users needing precise timing adjustments in their workflows.

30% of users were dissatisfied with latency control, feeling that the options provided were too limited or ineffective in completely eliminating latency issues. Some users experienced persistent latency that affected critical recording applications, leading to frustration and additional troubleshooting.

70%
Software Bundles

73% of users were satisfied with the software bundles included with the M-Track Duo, finding them useful for getting started with recording and production. The inclusion of basic DAWs and plugins was appreciated, as it provided immediate tools for users to begin their projects.

27% of users were dissatisfied with the software bundles, feeling that the included software was either too basic or not comprehensive enough for their needs. Some users found the software limited in functionality, requiring additional purchases to achieve their desired setup.

73%
User Manual

77% of users were satisfied with the user manual provided with the M-Track Duo, finding it clear and informative. Users appreciated the detailed explanations and troubleshooting tips, which helped them quickly understand and utilize the interface's features.

23% of users were dissatisfied with the user manual, stating that it lacked depth or clarity in certain sections. Some users found the manual insufficient for resolving specific technical issues, requiring them to seek additional support or resources.

77%
Overall Satisfaction

76% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the M-Audio M-Track Duo, highlighting its affordability, ease of use, and adequate performance for basic audio recording tasks. Many users felt that the interface met their expectations, providing a reliable and accessible entry point into home recording.

24% of users expressed overall dissatisfaction, primarily due to limitations in features and performance that did not meet their specific needs. Some users expected more advanced capabilities or higher sound quality, leading to disappointment with the overall experience.

76%

Pros:
Affordable price point, making it accessible for beginners. Compact and portable design, ideal for small spaces. Simple and easy-to-use interface with plug-and-play functionality. Includes a variety of bundled software for music production. Compatible with both Mac and PC operating systems.	Affordable price point. Compact and portable design. Easy to set up and use. Compatible with most DAWs. Offers phantom power for condenser microphones.

Cons:
Limited to 2 inputs and 2 outputs, which may not be sufficient for more complex recording needs. Build quality may not be as durable as higher-end interfaces. Lacks advanced features like MIDI input/output. Preamps may not offer the highest sound quality compared to more expensive models. No dedicated power supply, relies solely on USB power which can limit performance.	Limited to two input channels. Plastic build may feel less durable. Basic preamps may not satisfy professional users. No MIDI input/output. Lacks advanced features found in higher-end models.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
48 kHz / 16-Bit	48 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
1 Preamp	2 Preamps
Analog Audio I/O
1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input (Front Panel) 1x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 1x Stereo RCA Coaxial Unbalanced Monitor Output 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)	2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Host Connection
1x USB-B (Class-Compliant)	1x USB-B (Class-Compliant)
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.8 or Later Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit)	macOS 10.8 or Later Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit)
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

The M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface are both designed to provide high-quality audio recording and playback capabilities, but they offer different features and specifications catered to varied user needs.
The M-Audio M-Track Duo offers a higher maximum sampling rate of 48 kHz at 24-Bit compared to the M-Track Solo's 48 kHz at 16-Bit. This higher bit depth in the Duo provides more detailed audio resolution, which can be beneficial for professional recording applications. In terms of input/output channels, both interfaces offer 2 analog inputs and 2 outputs. However, the Duo features two combo XLR-1/4" TRS inputs on the front panel, allowing for more flexibility in connecting microphones and line instruments simultaneously. In contrast, the Solo provides one combo XLR-1/4" TRS input and an additional 1/4" TRS input, which limits the number of microphones that can be connected at the same time to one.
The Duo's analog audio I/O also includes two 1/4" TRS balanced line outputs and a 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output, whereas the Solo offers stereo RCA coaxial unbalanced monitor outputs and a 1/8" (3.5mm) TRS unbalanced headphone output. This difference in output options may influence user decisions based on the type of monitoring and speaker systems they use, with the Duo being more suitable for professional studio monitors that commonly use balanced TRS connections.
Both interfaces are USB class-compliant and are compatible with macOS 10.8 or later and Windows 7 or later (32-/64-Bit). They are powered via USB bus power, making them portable and easy to use with a single USB connection to a computer. The host connection for both devices uses a USB-B port.
In summary, while both the M-Track Duo and the M-Track Solo are designed for similar purposes, the Duo offers higher bit-depth recording, more flexible input options with dual combo XLR-1/4" TRS inputs, and balanced TRS outputs, making it a more versatile choice for users requiring higher audio fidelity and more robust connectivity options. The Solo, with its simpler input configuration, may be more suitable for users with basic recording needs or those using it primarily for podcasting or streaming with fewer input requirements.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
48 kHz / 16-Bit	48 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
1 Preamp	2 Preamps
Input Level Adjustment
2x Knob	2x Knob
Expansion Slots

The M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface both offer practical solutions for audio recording and streaming, but they differ in several key specifications.
Firstly, in terms of channels of I/O, both interfaces provide analog 2 inputs and 2 outputs. However, while the M-Track Duo supports a maximum sampling rate of 48 kHz at 24-bit, the M-Track Solo supports a maximum sampling rate of 48 kHz at 16-bit. This indicates that the M-Track Duo offers higher bit depth, which can result in more detailed audio capture.
The number of microphone inputs is another significant difference. The M-Track Duo is equipped with 2 preamps, allowing for two simultaneous microphone inputs, whereas the M-Track Solo only has 1 preamp, accommodating just one microphone input. This makes the M-Track Duo more suitable for situations requiring multiple microphone recordings, such as duets or interviews.
Both interfaces feature input level adjustment through two knobs, providing users with straightforward control over their input levels. Neither the M-Track Duo nor the M-Track Solo includes expansion slots or a built-in microphone, which keeps their designs simple and focused on essential functionalities.
In summary, while both the M-Track Duo and M-Track Solo offer similar I/O channel configurations and input level adjustments, the M-Track Duo stands out with its higher bit depth and additional microphone input. The M-Track Solo, on the other hand, may be more suited for solo recording needs with its single microphone preamp.

Signal Processing
Pad

Gain/Trim Range
Mic Inputs: 0 to +54 dB Line/Hi-Z Inputs: -10 to +44 dB	Mic Inputs: Up to +60 dB Line/Hi-Z Inputs: Up to +50 dB
High-Pass Filter

Solo/Mute

The M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface are both entry-level audio interfaces designed for home recording and basic studio setups. However, they differ significantly in terms of gain/trim range for their mic and instrument inputs.
The M-Audio M-Track Duo offers a more extensive gain/trim range for both microphone and line/Hi-Z inputs. Specifically, its mic inputs can provide up to +60 dB of gain, and its line/Hi-Z inputs can deliver up to +50 dB of gain. This makes the Duo more suitable for a wider variety of microphones and instruments, especially those that may require higher gain settings.
In contrast, the M-Audio M-Track Solo provides a more limited gain/trim range. Its mic inputs range from 0 to +54 dB, and its line/Hi-Z inputs range from -10 to +44 dB. While this is sufficient for many basic recording needs, it may not offer enough gain for some low-output microphones or instruments, thereby limiting its versatility compared to the Duo.
Both interfaces lack additional features such as a pad, high-pass filter, and solo/mute options, focusing instead on providing essential functionality for straightforward recording tasks. This makes them both suitable for beginners or those who need a simple, easy-to-use interface.
Overall, if you require a wider gain/trim range for better compatibility with a variety of audio sources, the M-Track Duo is the more robust option. On the other hand, the M-Track Solo may suffice for users with less demanding gain requirements.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input (Front Panel) 1x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 1x Stereo RCA Coaxial Unbalanced Monitor Output 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)	2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Phantom Power
48 V, Selectable On/Off	48 V, Selectable On/Off (Applied to All Inputs)
Digital Audio I/O

Host Connection
1x USB-B (Class-Compliant)	1x USB-B (Class-Compliant)
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0	USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)

Sync I/O

Network I/O

MIDI I/O

The M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface both offer a range of features suitable for various audio recording needs, but they differ in several key areas.
In terms of analog audio inputs and outputs, the M-Track Duo provides 2 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced mic/line/Hi-Z inputs on the front panel, making it versatile for different types of connections. It also includes 2x 1/4" TRS balanced line outputs and a 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output on the front panel. On the other hand, the M-Track Solo offers a single combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line input and an additional 1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced line/Hi-Z input on the front panel. The Solo also provides a stereo RCA coaxial unbalanced monitor output and a 1/8" (3.5 mm) TRS unbalanced headphone output on the front panel, which might be more convenient for users with smaller headphones.
Both interfaces feature 48V selectable phantom power, which is essential for powering condenser microphones. This phantom power is applied to all inputs on both devices, ensuring compatibility with a wide array of microphones.
Regarding digital audio inputs and outputs, neither the M-Track Duo nor the M-Track Solo includes any digital I/O options. They both rely solely on analog connections for audio input and output.
For host connection, both interfaces use a single USB-B port and are class-compliant, meaning they can be easily connected to a computer without requiring additional drivers. They both operate using the USB 2.0 protocol, ensuring compatibility with most modern computers.
Neither the M-Track Duo nor the M-Track Solo offers additional USB (non-host) connections, sync I/O, network I/O, or MIDI I/O. This makes them straightforward devices focused primarily on audio recording without added complexity or features for digital synchronization or networked audio.
In summary, the M-Track Duo is more versatile in terms of analog inputs and outputs, making it a better choice for users needing multiple mic/line inputs and balanced outputs. The M-Track Solo, however, provides a more compact and straightforward solution with its RCA monitor outputs and smaller headphone jack, which may be preferred for simpler setups or users with limited space.

Performance
Frequency Response
Mic, Line, Hi-Z Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.1 dB Monitor Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.1 dB Headphone Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.5 dB	Mic, Line, Hi-Z Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz +0.1 dB Monitor Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz +0.1 dB Headphone Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz +0.5 dB
Maximum Output Level
Line Outputs: +4 dBu	Line Outputs: +4 dBu
Headphone Output Power
60 mW per Channel into 32 Ohms	60 mW per Channel into 32 Ohms
Impedance
Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohm (Unbalanced)	Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohm (Unbalanced)
SNR
Mic Inputs: 109 dB (A-Weighted) Monitor Outputs: 109 dB (A-Weighted) Headphone Outputs: 100 dB (A-Weighted)	Mic Inputs: 109 dB (A-Weighted) Monitor Outputs: 109 dB (A-Weighted) Headphone Outputs: 100 dB (A-Weighted)
THD+N
Mic Inputs: 0.003% (A-Weighted, Min Gain, at 0 dBu) Line Inputs: 0.002% (A-Weighted, Min Gain, at 0 dBu) Hi-Z Inputs: 0.005% (A-Weighted, Min Gain, at 0 dBu) Monitor Outputs: 0.002% (A-Weighted, at 0 dBu) Headphone Outputs: 0.02% (A-Weighted)	Mic Inputs: 0.003% (A-Weighted, Min Gain, at 0 dBu) Hi-Z Inputs: 0.005% (A-Weighted, Min Gain, at 0 dBu) Headphone Outputs: 0.02% (A-Weighted)
EIN
Mic Inputs: -128 dBu A-Weighted (Max Gain)	Mic Inputs: -128 dBu A-Weighted (Max Gain)

The M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface share strikingly similar specifications across multiple features, making both devices highly competitive options for audio recording and production.
In terms of frequency response, both interfaces offer an identical range for Mic, Line, and Hi-Z inputs at 20 Hz to 20 kHz with a precision of ±0.1 dB for monitor outputs and ±0.5 dB for headphone outputs. This ensures accurate audio reproduction across the audible spectrum for both devices.
When it comes to maximum output level, both interfaces provide a line output of +4 dBu, and the headphone output power is also the same at 60 mW per channel into 32 Ohms. This consistency in output levels ensures that both interfaces deliver robust and clear audio signals suitable for professional monitoring and playback environments.
The impedance for Hi-Z inputs on both interfaces stands at 1 Megohm (Unbalanced), ensuring that they both can handle high-impedance instruments like electric guitars and basses effectively.
Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is another area where both interfaces perform equally well. Both the M-Track Duo and the M-Track Solo offer an SNR of 109 dB (A-Weighted) for mic inputs and monitor outputs, and 100 dB (A-Weighted) for headphone outputs. This high SNR ensures minimal background noise, providing clean and clear audio recordings.
The Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) and Total Harmonic Distortion plus Noise (THD+N) measurements for both interfaces are also quite similar. Both have a THD of 0.002% for line inputs and monitor outputs at 0 dBu. The THD+N values are also consistent with 0.003% for mic inputs, 0.005% for Hi-Z inputs, and 0.02% for headphone outputs (all A-Weighted). These low distortion figures indicate that both interfaces are capable of reproducing audio with high fidelity and minimal coloration.
Lastly, both the M-Track Duo and the M-Track Solo feature an Equivalent Input Noise (EIN) of -128 dBu (A-Weighted) at maximum gain for mic inputs, which ensures exceptionally low self-noise, making them suitable for recording quiet sources without introducing significant noise.
In conclusion, the M-Audio M-Track Duo and the M-Track Solo are nearly identical in terms of their technical specifications, offering high-quality audio performance with minimal noise and distortion. Choosing between them may come down to other factors such as physical design, connectivity options, or personal preference.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
48 kHz (AD/DA Conversion)	48 kHz (AD/DA Conversion)
Sample Rate Conversion

Bit Depths
16-Bit (AD/DA Conversion)	24-Bit (AD/DA Conversion)
Latency
Zero-Latency Direct Monitoring	Zero-Latency Direct Monitoring
Sync Sources
Internal	Internal

The M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface share several similarities, particularly in terms of sample rates and latency features. However, they differ significantly in bit depth, which may be a crucial factor depending on your audio recording and production needs.
Both interfaces support a sample rate of 48 kHz for AD/DA conversion, ensuring they can handle professional audio recording and playback. Neither of the devices supports sample rate conversion, so they both work solely at the 48 kHz rate. This uniformity makes them suitable for users who need consistency in their recording setups without necessitating additional sample rate conversion processes.
Zero-latency direct monitoring is a feature present in both interfaces, allowing for real-time monitoring of input signals without the delay that can interfere with performance and recording quality. This feature is crucial for musicians and producers who require immediate feedback to ensure accuracy and synchronization during their recording sessions. Additionally, both interfaces use internal sync sources, simplifying their operation by not requiring external synchronization devices.
The primary distinction between the two lies in their bit depth capabilities. The M-Audio M-Track Duo supports a 24-bit depth for AD/DA conversion, which provides higher resolution and more detailed audio recordings. In contrast, the M-Audio M-Track Solo offers a 16-bit depth, which, while still adequate for many recording purposes, does not capture the same level of detail and dynamic range as the 24-bit depth. Thus, the M-Track Duo is better suited for professional or more demanding audio production environments where capturing the finest nuances of sound is essential.
In summary, the M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface are similar in their sample rate, latency, and sync source features. However, the M-Track Duo stands out with its 24-bit depth capability, offering superior audio resolution compared to the 16-bit depth of the M-Track Solo. This difference makes the Duo a more suitable choice for users who require higher quality and more detailed audio recordings.

Audio Storage & Playback
Memory Card Slot

When comparing the M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface, it is essential to note that both devices do not feature a memory card slot. This similarity means that users of either interface will need to rely on their connected computer or external storage devices for recording and saving audio files, as neither interface can accommodate direct memory card usage.
The M-Audio M-Track Duo and the M-Track Solo share this characteristic, making them equally suitable for users who do not require an integrated memory card slot for their recording setup. Both interfaces are designed to connect via USB to a computer, where the recorded audio can be stored and processed. This commonality in the absence of a memory card slot highlights their focus on simplicity and direct-to-computer recording workflows.
In summary, the M-Audio M-Track Duo and the M-Track Solo both lack a memory card slot, necessitating the use of a computer for audio file storage. This shared feature aligns with their intended use cases and ensures that users will need to manage their recordings through connected computer systems.

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.8 or Later Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit)	macOS 10.8 or Later Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit)
Required Hardware
Available USB-A Port USB Cable (Included)	Available USB-A Port USB Cable (Included)
Internet Connection
Required for Registration, Software/Driver Download	Required for Registration, Software/Driver Download

The M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface share several key specifications, making them comparable in terms of operating system compatibility, required hardware, and internet connection needs.
Both the M-Track Duo and the M-Track Solo are compatible with macOS 10.8 or later and Windows 7 or later (32-/64-bit), ensuring they can operate smoothly on a wide range of modern computer systems. This compatibility is crucial for users who may be working across different platforms or updating their operating systems.
In terms of required hardware, both interfaces necessitate an available USB-A port and include a USB cable in the package. This ensures that users can easily connect the interfaces to their computers without needing to purchase additional cables or adapters.
Finally, both devices require an internet connection for registration and for downloading necessary software or drivers. This requirement ensures that users have access to the latest updates and support from M-Audio, enhancing the overall user experience and functionality of the audio interfaces.
Overall, the M-Audio M-Track Duo and M-Track Solo offer similar support in terms of OS compatibility, required hardware, and internet connection needs, making them both accessible and user-friendly options for audio recording and production.

Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

The M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface share a commonality in their power requirements, as both devices utilize USB bus power. This means that each interface draws the necessary power directly from the USB connection to your computer, eliminating the need for an external power supply. This feature enhances the portability and ease of setup for both audio interfaces, making them convenient choices for musicians and producers who need a mobile recording solution.
In terms of practical application, the USB bus power feature ensures that both the M-Track Duo and the M-Track Solo can be swiftly and effortlessly connected to a computer, reducing cable clutter and simplifying the user experience. This is particularly advantageous for users who require quick setup times and minimal technical complications, whether they are recording at home or on the go.
Overall, the shared power requirement of USB bus power in both the M-Audio M-Track Duo and M-Track Solo underscores their design philosophy of offering user-friendly, efficient, and portable audio recording solutions. This feature makes them suitable for a wide range of recording scenarios, from home studios to mobile recording sessions.

Physical
Dimensions
6.4 x 4.5 x 2.1" / 16.3 x 11.4 x 5.3 cm	7.5 x 4.4 x 2.1" / 19.1 x 11.2 x 5.3 cm
Weight
0.7 lb / 0.3 kg	0.8 lb / 0.4 kg

The M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface share similarities yet differ in a few key aspects, specifically in their dimensions and weight, which may influence user preference based on portability and space considerations.
The M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface measures 7.5 x 4.4 x 2.1 inches (19.1 x 11.2 x 5.3 cm) and weighs approximately 0.8 lb (0.4 kg). On the other hand, the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface is slightly more compact, with dimensions of 6.4 x 4.5 x 2.1 inches (16.3 x 11.4 x 5.3 cm) and a lighter weight of about 0.7 lb (0.3 kg).
In essence, the M-Track Solo is more portable due to its smaller size and lighter weight, which could be an advantage for users who need a highly mobile audio interface solution. Meanwhile, the M-Track Duo, being marginally larger and heavier, might offer more stability when placed on a desktop, but still remains relatively easy to transport and handle.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
1.155 lb	1.32 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
8 x 6 x 3.7"	9 x 6.1 x 3.7"

The M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface and the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface share many similarities but also have distinct differences, particularly in terms of weight and dimensions.
The M-Audio M-Track Duo USB-B Audio Interface comes with a package weight of 1.32 lb and has box dimensions measuring 9 x 6.1 x 3.7 inches. This suggests that the M-Track Duo is slightly heavier and marginally larger in terms of packaging compared to the M-Track Solo.
On the other hand, the M-Audio M-Track Solo Desktop 2x2 USB Audio Interface has a package weight of 1.155 lb and box dimensions of 8 x 6 x 3.7 inches. This makes the M-Track Solo lighter and a bit more compact than the M-Track Duo, which may be advantageous for users with limited space or those who require greater portability.
In summary, while both audio interfaces are relatively lightweight and compact, the M-Track Solo is the lighter and more compact option, whereas the M-Track Duo is slightly heavier and larger.