Arturia MiniFuse 2 vs MiniFuse 4: Which Audio Interface is Right for You?

The Arturia MiniFuse 2 and MiniFuse 4 are both high-quality, portable USB Type-C audio/MIDI interfaces designed to meet the needs of musicians, producers, and podcasters. However, they differ significantly in their input/output capabilities and target use cases.
The MiniFuse 2 is a 2x2 interface, meaning it has two inputs and two outputs. This compact unit is perfect for solo musicians or podcasters who need a straightforward interface for recording vocals, instruments, or external audio sources. It features two combo XLR/TRS inputs with high-quality preamps, allowing for a versatile range of recording scenarios. Additionally, it includes MIDI I/O for connecting external MIDI devices, such as keyboards or controllers. The MiniFuse 2 also provides phantom power for condenser microphones and comes with a suite of bundled software, including Ableton Live Lite, Analog Lab Intro, and various effects plugins, making it an excellent all-in-one solution for beginners and professionals on the go.
On the other hand, the MiniFuse 4 is a 4x4 interface, offering four inputs and four outputs. This model is ideal for more complex recording setups, such as multi-instrumentalists or small bands who need to record multiple sources simultaneously. Similar to the MiniFuse 2, it features high-quality preamps and combo XLR/TRS inputs, but with additional inputs for more extensive recording needs. The MiniFuse 4 also includes MIDI I/O and phantom power, maintaining the versatility required for a wide range of studio applications. Furthermore, it comes with the same comprehensive software bundle, ensuring users have everything they need to start producing right out of the box.
Both interfaces boast solid build quality, low-latency performance, and compatibility with both Mac and PC. They also feature a sleek, portable design that makes them easy to transport, making them ideal for mobile recording setups. Whether you're a solo artist looking for a simple yet powerful recording solution with the MiniFuse 2, or a more demanding user requiring additional inputs and outputs with the MiniFuse 4, Arturia's MiniFuse line offers reliable and professional-grade options to suit various recording needs.

In-Depth Comparison of Arturia MiniFuse 2 and MiniFuse 4 Specifications and Features

Arturia MiniFuse 2

Arturia MiniFuse 4

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the Arturia MiniFuse 2 Audio Interface. They appreciated the combination of price and features, highlighting it as an excellent entry-level interface that delivers professional quality sound without breaking the bank. Many users felt they received a lot of value for their money, especially with the included software package. 15% of users were dissatisfied with the purchase value, mainly due to expectations of higher-end features that were not present. Some users felt that the pricing could be more competitive in comparison to similar products with slightly better specifications. 85% Quality of Materials 80% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the MiniFuse 2, noting that it felt sturdy and reliable. They praised its solid build and compact design, which made it suitable for both home studios and on-the-go recording setups. 20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of materials, citing issues such as plastic components that felt less durable. A few users reported concerns about the longevity of the interface, feeling that it could be prone to wear and tear over time. 80% Ease of Use 90% of users found the Arturia MiniFuse 2 to be very user-friendly. They appreciated its intuitive interface, straightforward controls, and easy setup process. Many users, especially beginners, praised its simplicity and the seamless integration with various DAWs, making it a great choice for those new to audio recording. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the ease of use, often due to initial setup difficulties or issues with driver installation. Some users felt that the documentation did not provide enough guidance for troubleshooting common problems. 90% Sound Quality 88% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality of the MiniFuse 2. They appreciated the clear and crisp audio output, with many highlighting the low noise preamps and high headroom as standout features. Users noted that recordings maintained a professional quality, suitable for both voice and instrument inputs. 12% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, mentioning issues such as occasional audio glitches or interference. Some users felt that the output level was not as robust as expected, requiring additional gain adjustments during recordings. 88% Portability 92% of users were satisfied with the portability of the MiniFuse 2, praising its compact size and lightweight design. Users found it easy to transport, making it ideal for mobile recording setups or small home studios. Many appreciated how it fit easily into backpacks or laptop bags. 8% of users were less satisfied with the portability, mainly due to concerns about potential durability issues when transported frequently. Some felt that while it was small, additional protective casing was necessary to ensure it remained undamaged. 92% Software Compatibility 87% of users were pleased with the software compatibility of the MiniFuse 2, noting that it worked well with multiple digital audio workstations (DAWs) across both Windows and Mac systems. Users appreciated the seamless integration and the included software suite, which enhanced their recording experience. 13% of users were dissatisfied with software compatibility, often due to issues with specific DAW integration or driver conflicts. Some users experienced difficulties in accessing the full range of features or encountered bugs with certain software updates. 87% Customer Support 75% of users reported positive experiences with Arturia's customer support. They found the support team responsive and helpful in resolving technical issues or providing guidance on product use. Several users highlighted quick turnaround times for queries. 25% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delays in response times or lack of resolution for complex issues. Some users felt that the support resources were limited, particularly for less common technical problems. 75% Design 83% of users were satisfied with the design of the MiniFuse 2, appreciating its sleek and modern aesthetic. Users liked the layout and accessibility of controls, as well as the visual design which complemented their studio setups. 17% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the design, often due to personal preferences for different control layouts or aesthetic choices. Some users felt that certain design elements, like LED indicators, could be improved for better visibility. 83% Durability 78% of users were satisfied with the durability of the MiniFuse 2, stating that it withstood regular use without significant wear. Many users felt confident in the build quality, trusting it to handle minor knocks and bumps. 22% of users expressed concerns about durability, mentioning issues like loose knobs or connections after extended use. Some users felt that certain components were not robust enough for frequent transportation or heavy use. 78% Latency 86% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the MiniFuse 2. They noted minimal delay when monitoring recordings, which was crucial for real-time audio production. Users appreciated the smooth operation even with complex setups. 14% of users experienced dissatisfaction with latency, citing occasional lag in specific DAW environments or with certain software plugins. Some users required additional adjustments to optimize performance, which they found cumbersome. 86% Input/Output Options 82% of users were content with the input/output options available on the MiniFuse 2. They appreciated the flexibility provided by the multiple ports, which accommodated various recording needs from microphones to instruments. 18% of users were dissatisfied with the input/output options, feeling that additional ports or expanded functionality would be beneficial. Some users needed more connectivity for complex setups, which the interface did not provide. 82% Driver Stability 84% of users were satisfied with the stability of the MiniFuse 2 drivers, noting consistent performance with few to no crashes. Users appreciated the reliability of the drivers, which allowed for uninterrupted recording sessions. 16% of users experienced dissatisfaction with driver stability, often encountering occasional crashes or compatibility issues with certain operating systems. Some users expressed frustration at needing frequent driver updates to maintain stability. 84% Installation Process 88% of users had a positive experience with the installation process of the MiniFuse 2. They found it straightforward and quick, with clear instructions that guided them through setup efficiently. Many users appreciated the plug-and-play capability. 12% of users were dissatisfied with the installation process, citing challenges with downloading necessary drivers or software. Some encountered issues that required additional technical support, which complicated the initial setup. 88% Aesthetic Appeal 85% of users appreciated the aesthetic appeal of the MiniFuse 2, noting its modern and attractive design. Users felt that it complemented their studio setups and added a professional touch to their recording environment. 15% of users were less impressed with the aesthetic appeal, with personal preferences differing in terms of design style. Some users desired a more traditional or minimalistic look, which the MiniFuse 2 did not provide. 85% Connectivity 83% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the MiniFuse 2. They appreciated the USB-C connection, which provided fast data transfer speeds and compatibility with modern devices. Users found it easy to integrate into their existing setups. 17% of users expressed dissatisfaction with connectivity, particularly those who experienced compatibility issues with older hardware. Some users felt that additional connection options would enhance flexibility in different recording environments. 83% Compatibility with Instruments 87% of users were pleased with the MiniFuse 2's compatibility with various instruments. They noted that the preamps handled different input types well, delivering clear and balanced sound for both electric instruments and microphones. 13% of users were dissatisfied with instrument compatibility, mentioning specific issues with particular instrument types or brands. Some users required additional adjustments or settings to achieve optimal sound, which they found inconvenient. 87% Preamp Quality 89% of users were satisfied with the quality of the preamps in the MiniFuse 2. They highlighted the low-noise performance and how it enhanced the clarity and detail of their recordings. Users found the preamps to be a strong feature of the interface. 11% of users expressed dissatisfaction with preamp quality, citing specific instances of noise or distortion at higher gain levels. Some users felt that while adequate, the preamps could benefit from additional refinement for critical recording applications. 89% Headphone Output 80% of users were satisfied with the headphone output quality of the MiniFuse 2, noting clear and powerful sound suitable for monitoring recordings. Users appreciated the dedicated volume control, which allowed for precise adjustments. 20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the headphone output, often due to insufficient volume or perceived lack of clarity. Some users required more power for high-impedance headphones, which the interface struggled to provide. 80% Overall Performance 86% of users were satisfied with the overall performance of the MiniFuse 2, considering it a reliable and efficient audio interface for various recording needs. Users praised its consistent operation and the quality of recordings it produced. 14% of users experienced dissatisfaction with overall performance, often due to sporadic technical issues or limitations in specific recording scenarios. Some users felt that while generally good, certain features could be enhanced for superior performance. 86%	Purchase Value 85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Arturia MiniFuse 4 USB Type-C Audio Interface. They found it offered a competitive price point for the features it provided, such as multiple inputs and outputs, high-quality preamps, and robust software bundle. Many users highlighted that it was an excellent choice for both beginners and seasoned audio professionals, offering good value for money due to its versatility and quality. 15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, citing that there are other interfaces in the market with similar or better specs at a lower price. Some users also mentioned that the initial setup of the software included can be cumbersome, which detracts from the overall perceived value. 85% Quality of Materials 80% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They appreciated the solid build quality and the robust design, which gave them confidence in the product's durability. The metal casing was specifically mentioned as a positive aspect, contributing to the overall premium feel of the device. 20% of users expressed concerns over the quality of materials, with some reporting issues such as loose knobs and fragile connectors. A few users felt that the plastic components used in certain areas could detract from the product's long-term durability. 80% Sound Quality 90% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They praised the clarity and fidelity of the audio, noting that the high-quality preamps provided a clean and transparent sound. Users appreciated the low noise floor and the ability to capture detailed recordings, making it suitable for both home studios and professional environments. 10% of users were not fully satisfied with the sound quality, mentioning occasional interference or static noise issues. Some users felt that the interface's sound quality did not significantly stand out from other competing models in the same price range. 90% Ease of Use 75% of users found the Arturia MiniFuse 4 easy to use, highlighting the straightforward interface and intuitive layout. They appreciated the plug-and-play functionality and the user-friendly software that accompanied the device, which streamlined the recording process. 25% of users experienced challenges with ease of use, citing difficulties in initial setup and configuration. Some users found the accompanying software to be less intuitive, leading to a steeper learning curve, particularly for beginners. 75% Software Bundle 70% of users were pleased with the software bundle included with the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They appreciated the range of software tools available, which enhanced their recording and production capabilities. Users noted that the software added significant value to the overall package. 30% of users were dissatisfied with the software bundle, mentioning compatibility issues and a lack of clear instructions for installation. Some felt that the software could be improved to better meet the needs of advanced users or those with specific technical requirements. 70% Portability 85% of users found the Arturia MiniFuse 4 to be highly portable, valuing its compact size and lightweight design. This made it convenient for users who needed to transport their audio interface between different locations, such as for live performances or mobile recording sessions. 15% of users felt that the portability could be improved, suggesting that while the device is compact, the lack of a dedicated carrying case or protective cover made it less practical for frequent travel. 85% Compatibility with Devices 80% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Arturia MiniFuse 4 across various devices and operating systems. They appreciated that it worked seamlessly with both Windows and macOS, as well as with popular DAWs, without the need for extensive configuration. 20% of users encountered compatibility issues, particularly with older operating systems or less common DAWs. Some users reported driver installation problems or connectivity issues when using certain types of USB ports. 80% Customer Support 75% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Arturia. They found the support team to be responsive and helpful in resolving queries related to the MiniFuse 4, whether it was technical issues or general inquiries. 25% of users were not satisfied with the customer support experience, citing long response times and inadequate solutions to their problems. Some users felt that the level of support did not match the quality of the product. 75% Durability 80% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They noted that the sturdy construction and high-quality components contributed to the product's ability to withstand regular use without significant wear and tear. 20% of users expressed concerns about the long-term durability, with some experiencing issues such as loose connections or faulty components after extended use. These users felt that improvements could be made to enhance the product's longevity. 80% Latency 85% of users were impressed with the low latency performance of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They reported seamless real-time monitoring and recording experiences, which were particularly beneficial for musicians and producers working in time-sensitive environments. 15% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older computer systems or complex DAW setups. Some noted that additional configuration was required to minimize latency, which could be inconvenient. 85% Design 90% of users praised the design of the Arturia MiniFuse 4, highlighting its sleek, modern look and intuitive control layout. The aesthetic appeal, combined with functional design elements, made it a favorite among users who value both form and function. 10% of users were less impressed with the design, suggesting that while it was visually appealing, certain functional aspects such as knob placement could be improved for better usability. 90% Input/Output Options 85% of users appreciated the variety of input and output options available on the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They found the multiple XLR, line, and headphone outputs to be versatile and accommodating for various recording and monitoring needs. 15% of users wished for additional input/output options, particularly more digital outputs or MIDI connections, to better suit their specific setup requirements. 85% Aesthetics 90% of users were highly satisfied with the aesthetics of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They found the sleek design and color scheme to be visually appealing, complementing their studio setup and adding a professional touch. 10% of users felt that the aesthetics could be improved, with a few suggesting that more color options or customizable elements could enhance the appeal for a wider audience. 90% Build Quality 80% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They appreciated the sturdy construction and high-quality materials used, which provided confidence in the product's reliability and longevity. 20% of users expressed concerns about the build quality, with some noting issues such as wobbly knobs or inconsistent finishing that detracted from the overall perception of quality. 80% Connectivity 85% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They appreciated the USB Type-C connection, which offered fast and reliable data transfer, and the ability to connect seamlessly to a variety of devices. 15% of users experienced connectivity issues, particularly with older USB ports or cables. Some users suggested that the inclusion of additional connection types could enhance versatility. 85% User Interface 80% of users were satisfied with the user interface of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They found the layout to be intuitive and easy to navigate, allowing for quick adjustments and efficient workflow. 20% of users found the user interface to be less intuitive, with some suggesting that the labeling and layout could be improved for better clarity and ease of use, particularly for beginners. 80% Headphone Amplifier Quality 75% of users were pleased with the headphone amplifier quality, noting that it provided clear and accurate sound reproduction at various volume levels, making it suitable for detailed monitoring. 25% of users were not satisfied with the headphone amplifier quality, mentioning that it lacked power for high-impedance headphones and could introduce distortion at higher volumes. 75% Driver Stability 80% of users reported satisfaction with the driver stability of the Arturia MiniFuse 4, noting that it maintained reliable performance across multiple sessions without crashes or interruptions. 20% of users encountered driver stability issues, particularly when using specific DAWs or after software updates. Some users mentioned experiencing occasional glitches or the need for frequent driver updates. 80% Overall Performance 85% of users were highly satisfied with the overall performance of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They found it to be a reliable and versatile audio interface that met their recording and production needs effectively. 15% of users were not fully satisfied with the overall performance, citing specific issues such as occasional software bugs or hardware limitations that affected their workflow. 85% Value for Professionals 75% of professional users found value in the Arturia MiniFuse 4, appreciating its robust feature set, which met the demands of professional audio production environments. 25% of professional users felt that the Arturia MiniFuse 4 fell short of their expectations, particularly in terms of advanced features or expandability options that are crucial for high-end professional use. 75% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the Arturia MiniFuse 2 Audio Interface. They appreciated the combination of price and features, highlighting it as an excellent entry-level interface that delivers professional quality sound without breaking the bank. Many users felt they received a lot of value for their money, especially with the included software package.

15% of users were dissatisfied with the purchase value, mainly due to expectations of higher-end features that were not present. Some users felt that the pricing could be more competitive in comparison to similar products with slightly better specifications.

85%
Quality of Materials

80% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the MiniFuse 2, noting that it felt sturdy and reliable. They praised its solid build and compact design, which made it suitable for both home studios and on-the-go recording setups.

20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of materials, citing issues such as plastic components that felt less durable. A few users reported concerns about the longevity of the interface, feeling that it could be prone to wear and tear over time.

80%
Ease of Use

90% of users found the Arturia MiniFuse 2 to be very user-friendly. They appreciated its intuitive interface, straightforward controls, and easy setup process. Many users, especially beginners, praised its simplicity and the seamless integration with various DAWs, making it a great choice for those new to audio recording.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the ease of use, often due to initial setup difficulties or issues with driver installation. Some users felt that the documentation did not provide enough guidance for troubleshooting common problems.

90%
Sound Quality

88% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality of the MiniFuse 2. They appreciated the clear and crisp audio output, with many highlighting the low noise preamps and high headroom as standout features. Users noted that recordings maintained a professional quality, suitable for both voice and instrument inputs.

12% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, mentioning issues such as occasional audio glitches or interference. Some users felt that the output level was not as robust as expected, requiring additional gain adjustments during recordings.

88%
Portability

92% of users were satisfied with the portability of the MiniFuse 2, praising its compact size and lightweight design. Users found it easy to transport, making it ideal for mobile recording setups or small home studios. Many appreciated how it fit easily into backpacks or laptop bags.

8% of users were less satisfied with the portability, mainly due to concerns about potential durability issues when transported frequently. Some felt that while it was small, additional protective casing was necessary to ensure it remained undamaged.

92%
Software Compatibility

87% of users were pleased with the software compatibility of the MiniFuse 2, noting that it worked well with multiple digital audio workstations (DAWs) across both Windows and Mac systems. Users appreciated the seamless integration and the included software suite, which enhanced their recording experience.

13% of users were dissatisfied with software compatibility, often due to issues with specific DAW integration or driver conflicts. Some users experienced difficulties in accessing the full range of features or encountered bugs with certain software updates.

87%
Customer Support

75% of users reported positive experiences with Arturia's customer support. They found the support team responsive and helpful in resolving technical issues or providing guidance on product use. Several users highlighted quick turnaround times for queries.

25% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delays in response times or lack of resolution for complex issues. Some users felt that the support resources were limited, particularly for less common technical problems.

75%
Design

83% of users were satisfied with the design of the MiniFuse 2, appreciating its sleek and modern aesthetic. Users liked the layout and accessibility of controls, as well as the visual design which complemented their studio setups.

17% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the design, often due to personal preferences for different control layouts or aesthetic choices. Some users felt that certain design elements, like LED indicators, could be improved for better visibility.

83%
Durability

78% of users were satisfied with the durability of the MiniFuse 2, stating that it withstood regular use without significant wear. Many users felt confident in the build quality, trusting it to handle minor knocks and bumps.

22% of users expressed concerns about durability, mentioning issues like loose knobs or connections after extended use. Some users felt that certain components were not robust enough for frequent transportation or heavy use.

78%
Latency

86% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the MiniFuse 2. They noted minimal delay when monitoring recordings, which was crucial for real-time audio production. Users appreciated the smooth operation even with complex setups.

14% of users experienced dissatisfaction with latency, citing occasional lag in specific DAW environments or with certain software plugins. Some users required additional adjustments to optimize performance, which they found cumbersome.

86%
Input/Output Options

82% of users were content with the input/output options available on the MiniFuse 2. They appreciated the flexibility provided by the multiple ports, which accommodated various recording needs from microphones to instruments.

18% of users were dissatisfied with the input/output options, feeling that additional ports or expanded functionality would be beneficial. Some users needed more connectivity for complex setups, which the interface did not provide.

82%
Driver Stability

84% of users were satisfied with the stability of the MiniFuse 2 drivers, noting consistent performance with few to no crashes. Users appreciated the reliability of the drivers, which allowed for uninterrupted recording sessions.

16% of users experienced dissatisfaction with driver stability, often encountering occasional crashes or compatibility issues with certain operating systems. Some users expressed frustration at needing frequent driver updates to maintain stability.

84%
Installation Process

88% of users had a positive experience with the installation process of the MiniFuse 2. They found it straightforward and quick, with clear instructions that guided them through setup efficiently. Many users appreciated the plug-and-play capability.

12% of users were dissatisfied with the installation process, citing challenges with downloading necessary drivers or software. Some encountered issues that required additional technical support, which complicated the initial setup.

88%
Aesthetic Appeal

85% of users appreciated the aesthetic appeal of the MiniFuse 2, noting its modern and attractive design. Users felt that it complemented their studio setups and added a professional touch to their recording environment.

15% of users were less impressed with the aesthetic appeal, with personal preferences differing in terms of design style. Some users desired a more traditional or minimalistic look, which the MiniFuse 2 did not provide.

85%
Connectivity

83% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the MiniFuse 2. They appreciated the USB-C connection, which provided fast data transfer speeds and compatibility with modern devices. Users found it easy to integrate into their existing setups.

17% of users expressed dissatisfaction with connectivity, particularly those who experienced compatibility issues with older hardware. Some users felt that additional connection options would enhance flexibility in different recording environments.

83%
Compatibility with Instruments

87% of users were pleased with the MiniFuse 2's compatibility with various instruments. They noted that the preamps handled different input types well, delivering clear and balanced sound for both electric instruments and microphones.

13% of users were dissatisfied with instrument compatibility, mentioning specific issues with particular instrument types or brands. Some users required additional adjustments or settings to achieve optimal sound, which they found inconvenient.

87%
Preamp Quality

89% of users were satisfied with the quality of the preamps in the MiniFuse 2. They highlighted the low-noise performance and how it enhanced the clarity and detail of their recordings. Users found the preamps to be a strong feature of the interface.

11% of users expressed dissatisfaction with preamp quality, citing specific instances of noise or distortion at higher gain levels. Some users felt that while adequate, the preamps could benefit from additional refinement for critical recording applications.

89%
Headphone Output

80% of users were satisfied with the headphone output quality of the MiniFuse 2, noting clear and powerful sound suitable for monitoring recordings. Users appreciated the dedicated volume control, which allowed for precise adjustments.

20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the headphone output, often due to insufficient volume or perceived lack of clarity. Some users required more power for high-impedance headphones, which the interface struggled to provide.

80%
Overall Performance

86% of users were satisfied with the overall performance of the MiniFuse 2, considering it a reliable and efficient audio interface for various recording needs. Users praised its consistent operation and the quality of recordings it produced.

14% of users experienced dissatisfaction with overall performance, often due to sporadic technical issues or limitations in specific recording scenarios. Some users felt that while generally good, certain features could be enhanced for superior performance.

86%

Purchase Value

85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Arturia MiniFuse 4 USB Type-C Audio Interface. They found it offered a competitive price point for the features it provided, such as multiple inputs and outputs, high-quality preamps, and robust software bundle. Many users highlighted that it was an excellent choice for both beginners and seasoned audio professionals, offering good value for money due to its versatility and quality.

15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, citing that there are other interfaces in the market with similar or better specs at a lower price. Some users also mentioned that the initial setup of the software included can be cumbersome, which detracts from the overall perceived value.

85%
Quality of Materials

80% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They appreciated the solid build quality and the robust design, which gave them confidence in the product's durability. The metal casing was specifically mentioned as a positive aspect, contributing to the overall premium feel of the device.

20% of users expressed concerns over the quality of materials, with some reporting issues such as loose knobs and fragile connectors. A few users felt that the plastic components used in certain areas could detract from the product's long-term durability.

80%
Sound Quality

90% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They praised the clarity and fidelity of the audio, noting that the high-quality preamps provided a clean and transparent sound. Users appreciated the low noise floor and the ability to capture detailed recordings, making it suitable for both home studios and professional environments.

10% of users were not fully satisfied with the sound quality, mentioning occasional interference or static noise issues. Some users felt that the interface's sound quality did not significantly stand out from other competing models in the same price range.

90%
Ease of Use

75% of users found the Arturia MiniFuse 4 easy to use, highlighting the straightforward interface and intuitive layout. They appreciated the plug-and-play functionality and the user-friendly software that accompanied the device, which streamlined the recording process.

25% of users experienced challenges with ease of use, citing difficulties in initial setup and configuration. Some users found the accompanying software to be less intuitive, leading to a steeper learning curve, particularly for beginners.

75%
Software Bundle

70% of users were pleased with the software bundle included with the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They appreciated the range of software tools available, which enhanced their recording and production capabilities. Users noted that the software added significant value to the overall package.

30% of users were dissatisfied with the software bundle, mentioning compatibility issues and a lack of clear instructions for installation. Some felt that the software could be improved to better meet the needs of advanced users or those with specific technical requirements.

70%
Portability

85% of users found the Arturia MiniFuse 4 to be highly portable, valuing its compact size and lightweight design. This made it convenient for users who needed to transport their audio interface between different locations, such as for live performances or mobile recording sessions.

15% of users felt that the portability could be improved, suggesting that while the device is compact, the lack of a dedicated carrying case or protective cover made it less practical for frequent travel.

85%
Compatibility with Devices

80% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Arturia MiniFuse 4 across various devices and operating systems. They appreciated that it worked seamlessly with both Windows and macOS, as well as with popular DAWs, without the need for extensive configuration.

20% of users encountered compatibility issues, particularly with older operating systems or less common DAWs. Some users reported driver installation problems or connectivity issues when using certain types of USB ports.

80%
Customer Support

75% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Arturia. They found the support team to be responsive and helpful in resolving queries related to the MiniFuse 4, whether it was technical issues or general inquiries.

25% of users were not satisfied with the customer support experience, citing long response times and inadequate solutions to their problems. Some users felt that the level of support did not match the quality of the product.

75%
Durability

80% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They noted that the sturdy construction and high-quality components contributed to the product's ability to withstand regular use without significant wear and tear.

20% of users expressed concerns about the long-term durability, with some experiencing issues such as loose connections or faulty components after extended use. These users felt that improvements could be made to enhance the product's longevity.

80%
Latency

85% of users were impressed with the low latency performance of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They reported seamless real-time monitoring and recording experiences, which were particularly beneficial for musicians and producers working in time-sensitive environments.

15% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older computer systems or complex DAW setups. Some noted that additional configuration was required to minimize latency, which could be inconvenient.

85%
Design

90% of users praised the design of the Arturia MiniFuse 4, highlighting its sleek, modern look and intuitive control layout. The aesthetic appeal, combined with functional design elements, made it a favorite among users who value both form and function.

10% of users were less impressed with the design, suggesting that while it was visually appealing, certain functional aspects such as knob placement could be improved for better usability.

90%
Input/Output Options

85% of users appreciated the variety of input and output options available on the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They found the multiple XLR, line, and headphone outputs to be versatile and accommodating for various recording and monitoring needs.

15% of users wished for additional input/output options, particularly more digital outputs or MIDI connections, to better suit their specific setup requirements.

85%
Aesthetics

90% of users were highly satisfied with the aesthetics of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They found the sleek design and color scheme to be visually appealing, complementing their studio setup and adding a professional touch.

10% of users felt that the aesthetics could be improved, with a few suggesting that more color options or customizable elements could enhance the appeal for a wider audience.

90%
Build Quality

80% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They appreciated the sturdy construction and high-quality materials used, which provided confidence in the product's reliability and longevity.

20% of users expressed concerns about the build quality, with some noting issues such as wobbly knobs or inconsistent finishing that detracted from the overall perception of quality.

80%
Connectivity

85% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They appreciated the USB Type-C connection, which offered fast and reliable data transfer, and the ability to connect seamlessly to a variety of devices.

15% of users experienced connectivity issues, particularly with older USB ports or cables. Some users suggested that the inclusion of additional connection types could enhance versatility.

85%
User Interface

80% of users were satisfied with the user interface of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They found the layout to be intuitive and easy to navigate, allowing for quick adjustments and efficient workflow.

20% of users found the user interface to be less intuitive, with some suggesting that the labeling and layout could be improved for better clarity and ease of use, particularly for beginners.

80%
Headphone Amplifier Quality

75% of users were pleased with the headphone amplifier quality, noting that it provided clear and accurate sound reproduction at various volume levels, making it suitable for detailed monitoring.

25% of users were not satisfied with the headphone amplifier quality, mentioning that it lacked power for high-impedance headphones and could introduce distortion at higher volumes.

75%
Driver Stability

80% of users reported satisfaction with the driver stability of the Arturia MiniFuse 4, noting that it maintained reliable performance across multiple sessions without crashes or interruptions.

20% of users encountered driver stability issues, particularly when using specific DAWs or after software updates. Some users mentioned experiencing occasional glitches or the need for frequent driver updates.

80%
Overall Performance

85% of users were highly satisfied with the overall performance of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They found it to be a reliable and versatile audio interface that met their recording and production needs effectively.

15% of users were not fully satisfied with the overall performance, citing specific issues such as occasional software bugs or hardware limitations that affected their workflow.

85%
Value for Professionals

75% of professional users found value in the Arturia MiniFuse 4, appreciating its robust feature set, which met the demands of professional audio production environments.

25% of professional users felt that the Arturia MiniFuse 4 fell short of their expectations, particularly in terms of advanced features or expandability options that are crucial for high-end professional use.

75%

Pros:
Compact and portable design, ideal for mobile recording. High-quality preamps with low noise and high headroom. USB Type-C connectivity for faster data transfer and reliable connection. Includes a suite of software and virtual instruments for added value. MIDI I/O allows for integration with other MIDI gear. Direct monitoring with no latency.	Compact and portable design makes it easy to carry. High-quality audio performance with 24-bit/192kHz resolution. USB Type-C connectivity ensures fast and reliable data transfer. Multiple inputs and outputs (4x4) provide flexibility for various recording setups. Includes MIDI I/O for integrating external MIDI gear. Comes with a suite of bundled software for music production.

Cons:
Limited to 2 inputs and 2 outputs, which may not be sufficient for larger recording setups. USB Type-C cable not included, which may require additional purchase. No dedicated power supply option, relies solely on USB power. Plastic construction may not be as durable as metal alternatives. Some users may find the included software bundle unnecessary if they already own similar tools.	Limited physical controls may not suit all users. No onboard DSP effects for real-time monitoring. Requires computer connection for power. May not be sufficient for larger, more complex recording setups.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs	Analog: 4 Input / 4 Output Digital: Digital I/O
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	2
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)	2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line Input 4x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line/Monitor Output 2x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
OS Compatibility
macOS Windows	macOS 10.13 or Later (64-Bit Only) Windows 8.1 or Later (64-Bit Only)
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

The Arturia MiniFuse 2 and the Arturia MiniFuse 4 are both portable USB Type-C audio/MIDI interfaces, but they cater to different needs concerning input/output channels and overall functionality.
The Arturia MiniFuse 2 is equipped with 2 input and 2 output analog channels, making it an ideal choice for smaller recording setups. It supports a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit resolution, ensuring high-quality audio recording and playback. The device includes 2 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced mic/line/Hi-Z inputs on the front panel, 2 balanced 1/4" TRS line outputs, and a single 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output on the front panel. It connects to the host computer via a single USB-C port and is compatible with macOS and Windows operating systems. The MiniFuse 2 is powered via USB bus power, making it highly portable and convenient for on-the-go recording.
On the other hand, the Arturia MiniFuse 4 offers enhanced versatility with 4 input and 4 output analog channels, suitable for more complex recording environments. Like the MiniFuse 2, it supports a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit resolution. The interface includes 2 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced mic/line/Hi-Z inputs on the front panel, 2 additional balanced/unbalanced 1/4" TRS line inputs, 4 balanced 1/4" TRS line/monitor outputs, and 2 unbalanced 1/4" TRS headphone outputs on the front panel. The MiniFuse 4 also connects via a single USB-C port and is compatible with macOS 10.13 or later (64-bit only) and Windows 8.1 or later (64-bit only). It is powered through USB bus power, making it just as portable as the MiniFuse 2 but with expanded capabilities for more demanding recording tasks.
In summary, while both interfaces offer high-quality audio performance and portability, the MiniFuse 2 is more suited for simpler, smaller setups with its 2x2 I/O configuration. The MiniFuse 4, with its 4x4 I/O configuration, provides greater flexibility and is better equipped for larger, more complex recording scenarios.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs	Analog: 4 Input / 4 Output Digital: Digital I/O
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	2
Input Level Adjustment
2x Knob	2x Knob
Expansion Slots

The Arturia MiniFuse 2 Portable 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the Arturia MiniFuse 4 Portable 4x4 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface share some key similarities but also have distinct differences that cater to different user needs.
The Arturia MiniFuse 2 offers 2 channels of analog I/O, providing two inputs and two outputs. It supports a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit, ensuring high-quality audio recording and playback. This model includes 2 preamps for microphone inputs and features two input level adjustment knobs. However, it does not offer any expansion slots, making it a straightforward and compact choice for users with basic requirements.
On the other hand, the Arturia MiniFuse 4 expands on this by providing 4 channels of analog I/O, with four inputs and four outputs. Like the MiniFuse 2, it supports a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit, ensuring the same high-quality audio. This model also includes 2 microphone inputs with preamps and two input level adjustment knobs. Similar to the MiniFuse 2, it does not have built-in DSP, digital I/O, or expansion slots.
In summary, while both interfaces deliver high-quality audio and share a similar set of core features, the primary difference lies in their I/O capabilities. The MiniFuse 2 is more suited for simpler setups with its 2x2 configuration, while the MiniFuse 4 offers greater flexibility and capacity with its 4x4 configuration, making it a better option for users needing additional inputs and outputs.

Signal Processing
Pad

Gain/Trim Range
Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs: 56 dB	Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs: 56 dB
High-Pass Filter

Solo/Mute

The Arturia MiniFuse 2 Portable 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the Arturia MiniFuse 4 Portable 4x4 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface share several common specifications which highlight their similarities in certain features. Both interfaces do not include a pad function and offer a gain/trim range of 56 dB for Mic/Line/Hi-Z inputs. Additionally, neither of these interfaces has a high-pass filter or solo/mute functionality.
These shared features suggest that both the MiniFuse 2 and MiniFuse 4 are designed with a focus on delivering essential audio interface capabilities without additional onboard signal processing options such as high-pass filtering or solo/mute controls. This makes them streamlined choices for users who prioritize straightforward, high-quality recording and playback capabilities in a portable format.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)	2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line Input 4x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line/Monitor Output 2x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Phantom Power
48 V, Selectable On/Off (Applied to All Inputs)	48 V, Selectable On/Off (Applied to All Inputs)
Digital Audio I/O

Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0	USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)
1x USB-A (USB 2.0, Device Connection)	2x USB-A (USB 2.0, Device Connection)
Sync I/O

Network I/O

MIDI I/O
1x DIN 5-Pin Input 1x DIN 5-Pin Output	1x DIN 5-Pin Input 1x DIN 5-Pin Output

The Arturia MiniFuse 2 and Arturia MiniFuse 4 are both portable USB Type-C audio/MIDI interfaces designed for musicians and producers, but they differ significantly in their input/output capabilities and connectivity options.
The Arturia MiniFuse 2 is equipped with 2x combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced mic/line/hi-Z inputs on the front panel, making it suitable for small recording setups that require just a couple of inputs. It offers 2x 1/4" TRS balanced line outputs and a single 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output on the front panel. This model includes selectable 48V phantom power applied to all inputs, which is essential for powering condenser microphones. Regarding digital connectivity, the MiniFuse 2 does not include digital audio I/O but provides 1x USB-C host connection and 1x USB-A (USB 2.0) non-host device connection. For MIDI integration, it features 1x DIN 5-pin MIDI input and 1x DIN 5-pin MIDI output.
On the other hand, the Arturia MiniFuse 4 expands on the input/output capabilities significantly. It also features 2x combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced mic/line/hi-Z inputs on the front panel, but adds 2x 1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced line inputs, making it more versatile for recording multiple sources simultaneously. Additionally, it offers 4x 1/4" TRS balanced line/monitor outputs and 2x 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone outputs on the front panel, providing more options for monitoring and routing audio. Like the MiniFuse 2, it includes selectable 48V phantom power applied to all inputs. The MiniFuse 4 does not have digital audio I/O but features 1x USB-C host connection and 2x USB-A (USB 2.0) non-host device connections, allowing for more peripherals to be connected. It also includes 1x DIN 5-pin MIDI input and 1x DIN 5-pin MIDI output for MIDI connectivity.
In summary, the MiniFuse 4 offers a more extensive set of input and output options compared to the MiniFuse 2, making it a more suitable choice for users who need to connect multiple audio sources and require more flexibility in monitoring. Both interfaces feature USB 2.0 connectivity via USB-C and include essential MIDI I/O, but the MiniFuse 4 provides additional USB-A ports for connecting extra devices.

Performance
Frequency Response
Mic Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB (Min Gain) Hi-Z Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB (Min Gain) Line Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.05 dB (Min Gain) Line Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.09 dB Headphone Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.09 dB	Mic Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB (Min Gain) Hi-Z Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB (Min Gain) Line Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.05 dB (Min Gain) Line Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.09 dB Headphone Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.09 dB
Maximum Input Level
Mic Inputs: +9 dBu Hi-Z Inputs: +11.5 dBu Line Inputs: +22 dBu	Mic Inputs: +9 dBu Hi-Z Inputs: +11.5 dBu Line Inputs: +22 dBu
Maximum Output Level
Line Outputs: +12 dBu Headphone Outputs: +11.4 dBu	Line Outputs: +12 dBu Headphone Outputs: +11.4 dBu
Headphone Output Power
137 mW into 33 Ohms	137 mW into 33 Ohms
Impedance
Mic Inputs: 2.5 Kilohms Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohm Line Inputs: 16 Kilohms Line Outputs: 94 Ohms Headphone Outputs: 10 Ohms	Mic Inputs: 2.5 Kilohms Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohm Line Inputs: 16 Kilohms Line Outputs: 94 Ohms Headphone Outputs: 10 Ohms
Dynamic Range
Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs: 110 dB (A-Weighted) Line Outputs: 107.5 dB (A-Weighted) Headphone Outputs: 104 dB (A-Weighted)	Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs: 110 dB (A-Weighted) Line Outputs: 107.5 dB (A-Weighted) Headphone Outputs: 104 dB (A-Weighted)
THD+N
Mic Inputs: -100 dB (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Typical) Hi-Z Inputs: -91 dB (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Typical) Line Inputs: -100 dB (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Typical) Line Outputs: -101 dB (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Typical)	Mic Inputs: -100 dB (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Typical) Hi-Z Inputs: -91 dB (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Typical) Line Inputs: -100 dB (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Typical) Line Outputs: -101 dB (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Typical)
EIN
Mic Inputs: -129 dB A-Weighted	Mic Inputs: -129 dB A-Weighted

The Arturia MiniFuse 2 Portable 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the Arturia MiniFuse 4 Portable 4x4 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface share many identical specifications, reflecting their shared design lineage and focus on high-quality audio performance. Both interfaces offer a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz with minimal deviation across mic, Hi-Z, line, and headphone inputs and outputs, ensuring clear and consistent audio reproduction.
In terms of maximum input levels, both models provide +9 dBu for mic inputs, +11.5 dBu for Hi-Z inputs, and +22 dBu for line inputs. They also share the same maximum output levels, with +12 dBu for line outputs and +11.4 dBu for headphone outputs. The headphone output power for both interfaces is rated at 137 mW into 33 Ohms, which should be sufficient for most headphones.
Both the MiniFuse 2 and MiniFuse 4 have similar impedance characteristics, with mic inputs at 2.5 Kilohms, Hi-Z inputs at 1 Megohm, line inputs at 16 Kilohms, line outputs at 94 Ohms, and headphone outputs at 10 Ohms. This ensures compatibility with a wide range of microphones, instruments, and headphones.
Dynamic range is another area where the two interfaces match perfectly, offering 110 dB (A-Weighted) for mic, line, and Hi-Z inputs, 107.5 dB (A-Weighted) for line outputs, and 104 dB (A-Weighted) for headphone outputs. This high dynamic range ensures that the interfaces can handle a wide variety of audio signals without distortion.
Total Harmonic Distortion plus Noise (THD+N) values are also identical between the two models, with mic inputs at -100 dB, Hi-Z inputs at -91 dB, line inputs at -100 dB, and line outputs at -101 dB (all unweighted, 1 kHz, typical). Equivalent Input Noise (EIN) for mic inputs is rated at -129 dB A-Weighted for both interfaces, indicating very low noise levels and high-quality preamplification.
In summary, both the Arturia MiniFuse 2 and MiniFuse 4 offer nearly identical audio specifications, ensuring high-quality sound performance. The primary difference between the two models lies in their I/O configurations, with the MiniFuse 2 offering a 2x2 setup and the MiniFuse 4 providing a 4x4 configuration, making the latter more suitable for users requiring additional input and output channels.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 / 176.4 / 192 kHz	44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 / 176.4 / 192 kHz
Sample Rate Conversion

Bit Depths
24-Bit	24-Bit
Sync Sources
Internal	Internal

The Arturia MiniFuse 2 Portable 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the Arturia MiniFuse 4 Portable 4x4 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface share several key specifications, yet they cater to different needs in terms of connectivity and input/output options. Both interfaces support sample rates of 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, 176.4, and 192 kHz and do not feature sample rate conversion. They both also offer 24-bit depth, ensuring high-resolution audio recording and playback.
One of the primary differences between the two models lies in their input and output configurations. The MiniFuse 2 provides a 2x2 configuration, meaning it has two inputs and two outputs. This makes it suitable for solo musicians or small setups where only a couple of audio sources need to be recorded or monitored simultaneously. It also features zero-latency direct monitoring, which allows users to hear their input signals in real-time without any delay.
On the other hand, the MiniFuse 4 offers a more extensive 4x4 configuration with four inputs and four outputs. This expanded connectivity is ideal for users who need to handle multiple audio sources simultaneously, such as small bands, podcasters with multiple microphones, or producers requiring more flexible routing options. Both interfaces rely on internal sync sources to maintain accurate timing and coherence in their audio processing.
Overall, while both the MiniFuse 2 and MiniFuse 4 offer high-quality audio with identical sample rates and bit depths, the choice between them depends on the user's specific needs for input and output capacity. The MiniFuse 2 is tailored for simpler, more compact setups, whereas the MiniFuse 4 is designed to accommodate more complex audio environments with its additional I/O capabilities.

Audio Storage & Playback

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS Windows	macOS 10.13 or Later (64-Bit Only) Windows 8.1 or Later (64-Bit Only)
Required Hardware
Available USB 2.0 Port USB Cable (Included)	Available USB 2.0 Port USB Cable (Included)

The Arturia MiniFuse 2 Portable 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the Arturia MiniFuse 4 Portable 4x4 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface both serve as portable, high-quality audio interfaces but cater to slightly different needs and specifications.
Starting with OS compatibility, both devices support macOS and Windows, ensuring broad usability across different operating systems. The MiniFuse 2 is compatible with macOS and Windows in general, while the MiniFuse 4 specifies compatibility with macOS 10.13 or later and Windows 8.1 or later, both requiring 64-bit systems. This suggests that the MiniFuse 4 may offer more advanced features that necessitate updated operating systems.
Regarding hardware requirements, both interfaces necessitate an available USB 2.0 port and include the necessary USB cable for connectivity. However, the MiniFuse 4 specifies additional requirements for optimal performance. It requires an Intel Core i5 or better (64-bit) or an AMD Core i5 or better (64-bit) processor, and a RAM of 4 GB, with 8 GB recommended. This indicates that the MiniFuse 4 is designed to handle more demanding tasks and possibly more complex audio processing compared to the MiniFuse 2.
Both devices require an internet connection for registration and for downloading software or drivers, ensuring that users can access the latest updates and support from Arturia.
In summary, while both the MiniFuse 2 and MiniFuse 4 offer excellent portability and compatibility with major operating systems, the MiniFuse 4 demands more robust hardware, suggesting it is aimed at users with more intensive audio production needs. The MiniFuse 2 is ideal for those looking for a simpler, more straightforward interface, whereas the MiniFuse 4 is better suited for more advanced setups requiring greater processing power and memory.

Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

The Arturia MiniFuse 2 Portable 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the Arturia MiniFuse 4 Portable 4x4 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface are both high-quality audio interfaces designed for portability and ease of use, with several key differences in their specifications.
In terms of input and output capabilities, the MiniFuse 2 offers a 2x2 configuration, meaning it has two inputs and two outputs. This makes it ideal for solo musicians, podcasters, and smaller recording setups that require fewer channels. On the other hand, the MiniFuse 4 features a 4x4 configuration, providing four inputs and four outputs. This expanded I/O setup is better suited for more complex recording projects, such as multi-instrumental setups or small band recordings, where additional input and output channels are necessary.
Both interfaces share the same power requirement specification, operating via USB bus power. This means neither unit requires an external power supply, making them highly portable and convenient for mobile recording scenarios. Users can simply connect either interface to a computer using a USB Type-C connection for both data transfer and power.
In summary, while both the Arturia MiniFuse 2 and MiniFuse 4 are portable and powered via USB, the primary difference lies in their input and output configurations. The MiniFuse 2, with its 2x2 I/O, is ideal for simpler setups, whereas the MiniFuse 4, with its 4x4 I/O, caters to more complex recording needs.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
1.29 lb	2.015 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
9 x 5.3 x 1.9"	11.1 x 7.4 x 2"

The Arturia MiniFuse 2 Portable 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the Arturia MiniFuse 4 Portable 4x4 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface are two distinct models offering different capabilities and form factors.
Starting with the MiniFuse 2, it is designed as a compact, easy-to-carry audio interface with a package weight of 1.29 lb and box dimensions of 9 x 5.3 x 1.9 inches. This model features 2 input and 2 output channels, making it suitable for solo musicians or small recording setups. Its portability and minimal footprint make it an excellent choice for users who need a straightforward, efficient solution for recording on the go.
On the other hand, the MiniFuse 4 is a more robust option with a 4x4 input/output configuration, catering to more demanding recording needs. The increased package weight of 2.015 lb and larger box dimensions of 11.1 x 7.4 x 2 inches reflect its expanded capabilities. This model is ideal for users who require additional inputs and outputs, such as small bands or more complex recording environments. The extra channels provide more flexibility for multi-instrument recording sessions or integrating additional audio sources.
In summary, the MiniFuse 2 is a lightweight, compact interface ideal for simple recording tasks, while the MiniFuse 4 offers a more comprehensive solution with increased input/output channels, making it suitable for more extensive recording projects. Both models utilize USB Type-C connectivity, ensuring fast and reliable data transfer.