Arturia MiniFuse 2 vs Audient iD4 MKII: Comprehensive Audio Interface Comparison

The Arturia MiniFuse 2 and the Audient iD4 MKII are both highly regarded USB-C audio interfaces, yet they cater to slightly different needs and preferences in the realm of audio production.
The Arturia MiniFuse 2 is a compact and versatile 2x2 audio/MIDI interface that offers a balanced combination of functionality and affordability. It features two mic/instrument/line inputs with high-quality preamps and 48V phantom power, making it ideal for recording vocals, instruments, and line-level devices. The inclusion of MIDI I/O is a notable advantage, allowing seamless integration with MIDI controllers and other hardware. The MiniFuse 2 also boasts a robust software bundle, including Arturia’s Analog Lab Intro, Ableton Live Lite, and a selection of virtual instruments and effects. Its USB Type-C connectivity ensures fast data transfer and low latency, while its compact design makes it perfect for mobile recording setups.
On the other hand, the Audient iD4 MKII is renowned for its superior audio quality and professional-grade components. It features a single Audient Console mic preamp and a JFET DI input, designed to deliver pristine recordings with a hint of analog warmth. The iD4 MKII supports 24-bit/96kHz audio resolution, ensuring high-fidelity sound capture. One of its standout features is the ScrollControl function, which allows the volume knob to control various parameters in your DAW, enhancing workflow efficiency. While it lacks MIDI I/O, it compensates with its class-leading audio performance and rugged build quality. The iD4 MKII’s USB-C connection provides reliable power and connectivity, making it a solid choice for professional and semi-professional musicians and producers.
In summary, the Arturia MiniFuse 2 is an excellent choice for those seeking a versatile, all-in-one solution with MIDI capabilities and a comprehensive software package. It's particularly suited for mobile setups and users who appreciate a wide range of included software tools. Conversely, the Audient iD4 MKII is ideal for users prioritizing top-tier audio quality and robust build, even if it means forgoing MIDI I/O. Both interfaces offer excellent value within their respective niches, making them standout options for different types of audio production needs.

Specifications, Advantages, and Disadvantages

Arturia MiniFuse 2

Audient iD4 MKII

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the Arturia MiniFuse 2 Audio Interface. They appreciated the combination of price and features, highlighting it as an excellent entry-level interface that delivers professional quality sound without breaking the bank. Many users felt they received a lot of value for their money, especially with the included software package. 15% of users were dissatisfied with the purchase value, mainly due to expectations of higher-end features that were not present. Some users felt that the pricing could be more competitive in comparison to similar products with slightly better specifications. 85% Quality of Materials 80% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the MiniFuse 2, noting that it felt sturdy and reliable. They praised its solid build and compact design, which made it suitable for both home studios and on-the-go recording setups. 20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of materials, citing issues such as plastic components that felt less durable. A few users reported concerns about the longevity of the interface, feeling that it could be prone to wear and tear over time. 80% Ease of Use 90% of users found the Arturia MiniFuse 2 to be very user-friendly. They appreciated its intuitive interface, straightforward controls, and easy setup process. Many users, especially beginners, praised its simplicity and the seamless integration with various DAWs, making it a great choice for those new to audio recording. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the ease of use, often due to initial setup difficulties or issues with driver installation. Some users felt that the documentation did not provide enough guidance for troubleshooting common problems. 90% Sound Quality 88% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality of the MiniFuse 2. They appreciated the clear and crisp audio output, with many highlighting the low noise preamps and high headroom as standout features. Users noted that recordings maintained a professional quality, suitable for both voice and instrument inputs. 12% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, mentioning issues such as occasional audio glitches or interference. Some users felt that the output level was not as robust as expected, requiring additional gain adjustments during recordings. 88% Portability 92% of users were satisfied with the portability of the MiniFuse 2, praising its compact size and lightweight design. Users found it easy to transport, making it ideal for mobile recording setups or small home studios. Many appreciated how it fit easily into backpacks or laptop bags. 8% of users were less satisfied with the portability, mainly due to concerns about potential durability issues when transported frequently. Some felt that while it was small, additional protective casing was necessary to ensure it remained undamaged. 92% Software Compatibility 87% of users were pleased with the software compatibility of the MiniFuse 2, noting that it worked well with multiple digital audio workstations (DAWs) across both Windows and Mac systems. Users appreciated the seamless integration and the included software suite, which enhanced their recording experience. 13% of users were dissatisfied with software compatibility, often due to issues with specific DAW integration or driver conflicts. Some users experienced difficulties in accessing the full range of features or encountered bugs with certain software updates. 87% Customer Support 75% of users reported positive experiences with Arturia's customer support. They found the support team responsive and helpful in resolving technical issues or providing guidance on product use. Several users highlighted quick turnaround times for queries. 25% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delays in response times or lack of resolution for complex issues. Some users felt that the support resources were limited, particularly for less common technical problems. 75% Design 83% of users were satisfied with the design of the MiniFuse 2, appreciating its sleek and modern aesthetic. Users liked the layout and accessibility of controls, as well as the visual design which complemented their studio setups. 17% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the design, often due to personal preferences for different control layouts or aesthetic choices. Some users felt that certain design elements, like LED indicators, could be improved for better visibility. 83% Durability 78% of users were satisfied with the durability of the MiniFuse 2, stating that it withstood regular use without significant wear. Many users felt confident in the build quality, trusting it to handle minor knocks and bumps. 22% of users expressed concerns about durability, mentioning issues like loose knobs or connections after extended use. Some users felt that certain components were not robust enough for frequent transportation or heavy use. 78% Latency 86% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the MiniFuse 2. They noted minimal delay when monitoring recordings, which was crucial for real-time audio production. Users appreciated the smooth operation even with complex setups. 14% of users experienced dissatisfaction with latency, citing occasional lag in specific DAW environments or with certain software plugins. Some users required additional adjustments to optimize performance, which they found cumbersome. 86% Input/Output Options 82% of users were content with the input/output options available on the MiniFuse 2. They appreciated the flexibility provided by the multiple ports, which accommodated various recording needs from microphones to instruments. 18% of users were dissatisfied with the input/output options, feeling that additional ports or expanded functionality would be beneficial. Some users needed more connectivity for complex setups, which the interface did not provide. 82% Driver Stability 84% of users were satisfied with the stability of the MiniFuse 2 drivers, noting consistent performance with few to no crashes. Users appreciated the reliability of the drivers, which allowed for uninterrupted recording sessions. 16% of users experienced dissatisfaction with driver stability, often encountering occasional crashes or compatibility issues with certain operating systems. Some users expressed frustration at needing frequent driver updates to maintain stability. 84% Installation Process 88% of users had a positive experience with the installation process of the MiniFuse 2. They found it straightforward and quick, with clear instructions that guided them through setup efficiently. Many users appreciated the plug-and-play capability. 12% of users were dissatisfied with the installation process, citing challenges with downloading necessary drivers or software. Some encountered issues that required additional technical support, which complicated the initial setup. 88% Aesthetic Appeal 85% of users appreciated the aesthetic appeal of the MiniFuse 2, noting its modern and attractive design. Users felt that it complemented their studio setups and added a professional touch to their recording environment. 15% of users were less impressed with the aesthetic appeal, with personal preferences differing in terms of design style. Some users desired a more traditional or minimalistic look, which the MiniFuse 2 did not provide. 85% Connectivity 83% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the MiniFuse 2. They appreciated the USB-C connection, which provided fast data transfer speeds and compatibility with modern devices. Users found it easy to integrate into their existing setups. 17% of users expressed dissatisfaction with connectivity, particularly those who experienced compatibility issues with older hardware. Some users felt that additional connection options would enhance flexibility in different recording environments. 83% Compatibility with Instruments 87% of users were pleased with the MiniFuse 2's compatibility with various instruments. They noted that the preamps handled different input types well, delivering clear and balanced sound for both electric instruments and microphones. 13% of users were dissatisfied with instrument compatibility, mentioning specific issues with particular instrument types or brands. Some users required additional adjustments or settings to achieve optimal sound, which they found inconvenient. 87% Preamp Quality 89% of users were satisfied with the quality of the preamps in the MiniFuse 2. They highlighted the low-noise performance and how it enhanced the clarity and detail of their recordings. Users found the preamps to be a strong feature of the interface. 11% of users expressed dissatisfaction with preamp quality, citing specific instances of noise or distortion at higher gain levels. Some users felt that while adequate, the preamps could benefit from additional refinement for critical recording applications. 89% Headphone Output 80% of users were satisfied with the headphone output quality of the MiniFuse 2, noting clear and powerful sound suitable for monitoring recordings. Users appreciated the dedicated volume control, which allowed for precise adjustments. 20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the headphone output, often due to insufficient volume or perceived lack of clarity. Some users required more power for high-impedance headphones, which the interface struggled to provide. 80% Overall Performance 86% of users were satisfied with the overall performance of the MiniFuse 2, considering it a reliable and efficient audio interface for various recording needs. Users praised its consistent operation and the quality of recordings it produced. 14% of users experienced dissatisfaction with overall performance, often due to sporadic technical issues or limitations in specific recording scenarios. Some users felt that while generally good, certain features could be enhanced for superior performance. 86%	Purchase Value 85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Audient iD4 MKII, highlighting its competitive pricing for the quality it offers. Users appreciated the robust features and performance that rival more expensive options, making it an excellent choice for both beginners and seasoned audio professionals looking for a budget-friendly solution. 15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, noting that while the initial cost is competitive, some felt that the inclusion of additional features or bundled accessories would have enhanced its value proposition. 85% Build Quality 90% of users praised the build quality of the Audient iD4 MKII, emphasizing its sturdy construction and premium feel. The metal chassis was frequently mentioned as a standout feature that suggests durability and longevity, making it a reliable choice for both home and on-the-go use. 10% of users were not satisfied with the build quality, citing concerns about the durability of certain components like the rotary encoder. Some users felt these parts might not withstand heavy, prolonged use. 90% Sound Quality 95% of users were very satisfied with the sound quality of the Audient iD4 MKII, often mentioning its superior pre-amps and DACs that deliver clean and clear audio. Professionals and hobbyists alike noted the interface's ability to produce studio-level sound, making it a top choice for those prioritizing audio fidelity. 5% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, mostly due to specific preferences or expectations not being met. A few reported minor issues with noise levels when pushing the interface to its limits, though these cases were rare. 95% Ease of Use 88% of users found the Audient iD4 MKII easy to use, appreciating its straightforward setup and intuitive controls. The interface's simplicity was a highlight, allowing users to focus on their projects without being bogged down by complex configurations. 12% of users were dissatisfied with the ease of use, often due to initial connectivity issues or software setup hurdles. Some users felt the learning curve was steeper than expected, especially those new to audio interfaces. 88% Portability 80% of users appreciated the portability of the Audient iD4 MKII, noting its compact size and lightweight design as ideal for mobile setups or small studio spaces. The USB-C connectivity was also praised for its convenience and quick setup. 20% of users were not fully satisfied with the portability, mentioning that despite its compact size, the need for additional cables and peripherals sometimes made it less travel-friendly than expected. 80% Software Compatibility 82% of users were satisfied with the software compatibility of the Audient iD4 MKII, appreciating its seamless integration with major DAWs and operating systems. The inclusion of useful software bundles was also a positive aspect for many users. 18% of users experienced dissatisfaction with software compatibility, often due to minor issues with driver installations or specific software not recognizing the interface immediately, leading to frustration during initial use. 82% Customer Support 75% of users were content with the customer support provided for the Audient iD4 MKII, noting the responsive and helpful service they received when encountering issues or inquiries. Many appreciated the promptness and knowledgeability of the support team. 25% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses or a lack of resolution for their specific problems. Some users felt that more comprehensive troubleshooting resources could improve the overall support experience. 75% Durability 85% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Audient iD4 MKII, often highlighting its robust build and long-lasting performance. Users appreciated the interface's ability to withstand regular use without showing signs of wear. 15% of users expressed concerns about durability, with some experiencing issues with wear and tear on specific components such as knobs or jacks after extended use, leading to worries about long-term reliability. 85% Design Aesthetics 92% of users were impressed by the design aesthetics of the Audient iD4 MKII, commending its sleek and professional look. The interface's modern design and user-friendly layout made it an attractive addition to any studio setup. 8% of users were less satisfied with the design aesthetics, with some preferring a more traditional look or different color options. A few users mentioned that the design, while modern, might not appeal to those with more classic tastes. 92% Latency 87% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the Audient iD4 MKII, noting minimal delay during recording and playback. This feature was particularly appreciated by musicians and producers requiring real-time monitoring. 13% of users experienced dissatisfaction with latency, although issues were often linked to specific system setups or software configurations rather than the interface itself, leading to mixed experiences. 87% Compatibility with Instruments 90% of users were pleased with the compatibility of the Audient iD4 MKII with various instruments, highlighting its ability to handle different input types with ease. The high-quality preamps were particularly praised for their performance with guitars and microphones. 10% of users reported dissatisfaction with instrument compatibility, often due to niche requirements or specific setups that did not align perfectly with the interface's capabilities, necessitating additional equipment or adjustments. 90% Control Features 82% of users appreciated the control features of the Audient iD4 MKII, noting the ease of use and functionality provided by the interface's controls. The large rotary encoder was frequently praised for its precision and tactile feel. 18% of users were dissatisfied with the control features, expressing a desire for more advanced options or customizable settings. Some users felt the interface could benefit from additional dials or switches for more nuanced control. 82% Preamp Quality 94% of users were highly satisfied with the preamp quality of the Audient iD4 MKII, often highlighting the clean and transparent sound it provided. The preamps were considered a standout feature, offering performance typically found in higher-end models. 6% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the preamp quality, typically due to specific preferences or compatibility issues with certain microphones. Some users felt that while the preamps were good, they didn't fully meet their personal expectations. 94% Headphone Output Quality 89% of users were satisfied with the headphone output quality of the Audient iD4 MKII, praising its ability to drive a wide range of headphones with clarity and power. Users noted that the output remained clear even at higher volumes. 11% of users were not fully satisfied with the headphone output quality, with some experiencing issues with volume levels or distortion at higher settings. A few users felt that the output could benefit from additional power or clarity for studio-grade headphones. 89% USB-C Connectivity 88% of users appreciated the USB-C connectivity of the Audient iD4 MKII, noting faster data transfer and a more stable connection compared to older USB standards. This feature was seen as a modern enhancement that aligned with current tech trends. 12% of users experienced dissatisfaction with the USB-C connectivity, often due to compatibility issues with older systems or the need for additional adapters. Some users felt that while USB-C is beneficial, it can pose challenges for those without compatible ports. 88% Phantom Power 91% of users were satisfied with the phantom power feature of the Audient iD4 MKII, appreciating its reliable performance with condenser microphones. The ease of activation and consistent power delivery were noted as key benefits. 9% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the phantom power, mainly due to specific cases where the power delivery did not meet expectations for certain high-demand microphones, leading to concerns about its adequacy for all recording situations. 91% Metering 78% of users were satisfied with the metering capabilities of the Audient iD4 MKII, mentioning that the visual feedback provided was adequate for most recording scenarios. Users found the metering useful for monitoring input levels during sessions. 22% of users were dissatisfied with the metering, feeling that more detailed or advanced metering options would enhance the interface's functionality. Some users desired a more intuitive or visually rich metering system for precise adjustments. 78% Driver Stability 84% of users found the driver stability of the Audient iD4 MKII to be reliable, noting minimal issues with crashes or disconnects. Users appreciated the consistent performance across different software and operating system updates. 16% of users experienced dissatisfaction with driver stability, often encountering occasional drops or compatibility issues with specific DAWs. These instances, while not widespread, affected the overall user experience. 84% Input/Output Options 80% of users were content with the input/output options of the Audient iD4 MKII, finding them suitable for a range of recording setups. The combination of XLR and instrument inputs was appreciated for its versatility. 20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the input/output options, often wishing for more flexibility or additional ports to accommodate complex setups. Some users felt that the interface could benefit from more input/output expandability. 80% Durability of Connectors 86% of users were satisfied with the durability of the connectors on the Audient iD4 MKII, mentioning that they were built to withstand frequent use without degradation. The solid feel of the connectors was a highlight for many. 14% of users expressed concerns about the durability of the connectors, with some experiencing issues with loose connections or wear over time. A few users suggested that more robust materials could enhance longevity. 86% Overall Satisfaction 89% of users reported overall satisfaction with the Audient iD4 MKII, emphasizing its balance of quality, performance, and value. Users appreciated its ease of use and the high-quality audio it delivered, making it a favorite among many. 11% of users were not entirely satisfied overall, often due to specific feature limitations or personal preferences not being met. Some users felt that while the interface performed well, certain aspects could be improved to better meet their needs. 89% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the Arturia MiniFuse 2 Audio Interface. They appreciated the combination of price and features, highlighting it as an excellent entry-level interface that delivers professional quality sound without breaking the bank. Many users felt they received a lot of value for their money, especially with the included software package.

15% of users were dissatisfied with the purchase value, mainly due to expectations of higher-end features that were not present. Some users felt that the pricing could be more competitive in comparison to similar products with slightly better specifications.

85%
Quality of Materials

80% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the MiniFuse 2, noting that it felt sturdy and reliable. They praised its solid build and compact design, which made it suitable for both home studios and on-the-go recording setups.

20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of materials, citing issues such as plastic components that felt less durable. A few users reported concerns about the longevity of the interface, feeling that it could be prone to wear and tear over time.

80%
Ease of Use

90% of users found the Arturia MiniFuse 2 to be very user-friendly. They appreciated its intuitive interface, straightforward controls, and easy setup process. Many users, especially beginners, praised its simplicity and the seamless integration with various DAWs, making it a great choice for those new to audio recording.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the ease of use, often due to initial setup difficulties or issues with driver installation. Some users felt that the documentation did not provide enough guidance for troubleshooting common problems.

90%
Sound Quality

88% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality of the MiniFuse 2. They appreciated the clear and crisp audio output, with many highlighting the low noise preamps and high headroom as standout features. Users noted that recordings maintained a professional quality, suitable for both voice and instrument inputs.

12% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, mentioning issues such as occasional audio glitches or interference. Some users felt that the output level was not as robust as expected, requiring additional gain adjustments during recordings.

88%
Portability

92% of users were satisfied with the portability of the MiniFuse 2, praising its compact size and lightweight design. Users found it easy to transport, making it ideal for mobile recording setups or small home studios. Many appreciated how it fit easily into backpacks or laptop bags.

8% of users were less satisfied with the portability, mainly due to concerns about potential durability issues when transported frequently. Some felt that while it was small, additional protective casing was necessary to ensure it remained undamaged.

92%
Software Compatibility

87% of users were pleased with the software compatibility of the MiniFuse 2, noting that it worked well with multiple digital audio workstations (DAWs) across both Windows and Mac systems. Users appreciated the seamless integration and the included software suite, which enhanced their recording experience.

13% of users were dissatisfied with software compatibility, often due to issues with specific DAW integration or driver conflicts. Some users experienced difficulties in accessing the full range of features or encountered bugs with certain software updates.

87%
Customer Support

75% of users reported positive experiences with Arturia's customer support. They found the support team responsive and helpful in resolving technical issues or providing guidance on product use. Several users highlighted quick turnaround times for queries.

25% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delays in response times or lack of resolution for complex issues. Some users felt that the support resources were limited, particularly for less common technical problems.

75%
Design

83% of users were satisfied with the design of the MiniFuse 2, appreciating its sleek and modern aesthetic. Users liked the layout and accessibility of controls, as well as the visual design which complemented their studio setups.

17% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the design, often due to personal preferences for different control layouts or aesthetic choices. Some users felt that certain design elements, like LED indicators, could be improved for better visibility.

83%
Durability

78% of users were satisfied with the durability of the MiniFuse 2, stating that it withstood regular use without significant wear. Many users felt confident in the build quality, trusting it to handle minor knocks and bumps.

22% of users expressed concerns about durability, mentioning issues like loose knobs or connections after extended use. Some users felt that certain components were not robust enough for frequent transportation or heavy use.

78%
Latency

86% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the MiniFuse 2. They noted minimal delay when monitoring recordings, which was crucial for real-time audio production. Users appreciated the smooth operation even with complex setups.

14% of users experienced dissatisfaction with latency, citing occasional lag in specific DAW environments or with certain software plugins. Some users required additional adjustments to optimize performance, which they found cumbersome.

86%
Input/Output Options

82% of users were content with the input/output options available on the MiniFuse 2. They appreciated the flexibility provided by the multiple ports, which accommodated various recording needs from microphones to instruments.

18% of users were dissatisfied with the input/output options, feeling that additional ports or expanded functionality would be beneficial. Some users needed more connectivity for complex setups, which the interface did not provide.

82%
Driver Stability

84% of users were satisfied with the stability of the MiniFuse 2 drivers, noting consistent performance with few to no crashes. Users appreciated the reliability of the drivers, which allowed for uninterrupted recording sessions.

16% of users experienced dissatisfaction with driver stability, often encountering occasional crashes or compatibility issues with certain operating systems. Some users expressed frustration at needing frequent driver updates to maintain stability.

84%
Installation Process

88% of users had a positive experience with the installation process of the MiniFuse 2. They found it straightforward and quick, with clear instructions that guided them through setup efficiently. Many users appreciated the plug-and-play capability.

12% of users were dissatisfied with the installation process, citing challenges with downloading necessary drivers or software. Some encountered issues that required additional technical support, which complicated the initial setup.

88%
Aesthetic Appeal

85% of users appreciated the aesthetic appeal of the MiniFuse 2, noting its modern and attractive design. Users felt that it complemented their studio setups and added a professional touch to their recording environment.

15% of users were less impressed with the aesthetic appeal, with personal preferences differing in terms of design style. Some users desired a more traditional or minimalistic look, which the MiniFuse 2 did not provide.

85%
Connectivity

83% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the MiniFuse 2. They appreciated the USB-C connection, which provided fast data transfer speeds and compatibility with modern devices. Users found it easy to integrate into their existing setups.

17% of users expressed dissatisfaction with connectivity, particularly those who experienced compatibility issues with older hardware. Some users felt that additional connection options would enhance flexibility in different recording environments.

83%
Compatibility with Instruments

87% of users were pleased with the MiniFuse 2's compatibility with various instruments. They noted that the preamps handled different input types well, delivering clear and balanced sound for both electric instruments and microphones.

13% of users were dissatisfied with instrument compatibility, mentioning specific issues with particular instrument types or brands. Some users required additional adjustments or settings to achieve optimal sound, which they found inconvenient.

87%
Preamp Quality

89% of users were satisfied with the quality of the preamps in the MiniFuse 2. They highlighted the low-noise performance and how it enhanced the clarity and detail of their recordings. Users found the preamps to be a strong feature of the interface.

11% of users expressed dissatisfaction with preamp quality, citing specific instances of noise or distortion at higher gain levels. Some users felt that while adequate, the preamps could benefit from additional refinement for critical recording applications.

89%
Headphone Output

80% of users were satisfied with the headphone output quality of the MiniFuse 2, noting clear and powerful sound suitable for monitoring recordings. Users appreciated the dedicated volume control, which allowed for precise adjustments.

20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the headphone output, often due to insufficient volume or perceived lack of clarity. Some users required more power for high-impedance headphones, which the interface struggled to provide.

80%
Overall Performance

86% of users were satisfied with the overall performance of the MiniFuse 2, considering it a reliable and efficient audio interface for various recording needs. Users praised its consistent operation and the quality of recordings it produced.

14% of users experienced dissatisfaction with overall performance, often due to sporadic technical issues or limitations in specific recording scenarios. Some users felt that while generally good, certain features could be enhanced for superior performance.

86%

Purchase Value

85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Audient iD4 MKII, highlighting its competitive pricing for the quality it offers. Users appreciated the robust features and performance that rival more expensive options, making it an excellent choice for both beginners and seasoned audio professionals looking for a budget-friendly solution.

15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, noting that while the initial cost is competitive, some felt that the inclusion of additional features or bundled accessories would have enhanced its value proposition.

85%
Build Quality

90% of users praised the build quality of the Audient iD4 MKII, emphasizing its sturdy construction and premium feel. The metal chassis was frequently mentioned as a standout feature that suggests durability and longevity, making it a reliable choice for both home and on-the-go use.

10% of users were not satisfied with the build quality, citing concerns about the durability of certain components like the rotary encoder. Some users felt these parts might not withstand heavy, prolonged use.

90%
Sound Quality

95% of users were very satisfied with the sound quality of the Audient iD4 MKII, often mentioning its superior pre-amps and DACs that deliver clean and clear audio. Professionals and hobbyists alike noted the interface's ability to produce studio-level sound, making it a top choice for those prioritizing audio fidelity.

5% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, mostly due to specific preferences or expectations not being met. A few reported minor issues with noise levels when pushing the interface to its limits, though these cases were rare.

95%
Ease of Use

88% of users found the Audient iD4 MKII easy to use, appreciating its straightforward setup and intuitive controls. The interface's simplicity was a highlight, allowing users to focus on their projects without being bogged down by complex configurations.

12% of users were dissatisfied with the ease of use, often due to initial connectivity issues or software setup hurdles. Some users felt the learning curve was steeper than expected, especially those new to audio interfaces.

88%
Portability

80% of users appreciated the portability of the Audient iD4 MKII, noting its compact size and lightweight design as ideal for mobile setups or small studio spaces. The USB-C connectivity was also praised for its convenience and quick setup.

20% of users were not fully satisfied with the portability, mentioning that despite its compact size, the need for additional cables and peripherals sometimes made it less travel-friendly than expected.

80%
Software Compatibility

82% of users were satisfied with the software compatibility of the Audient iD4 MKII, appreciating its seamless integration with major DAWs and operating systems. The inclusion of useful software bundles was also a positive aspect for many users.

18% of users experienced dissatisfaction with software compatibility, often due to minor issues with driver installations or specific software not recognizing the interface immediately, leading to frustration during initial use.

82%
Customer Support

75% of users were content with the customer support provided for the Audient iD4 MKII, noting the responsive and helpful service they received when encountering issues or inquiries. Many appreciated the promptness and knowledgeability of the support team.

25% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses or a lack of resolution for their specific problems. Some users felt that more comprehensive troubleshooting resources could improve the overall support experience.

75%
Durability

85% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Audient iD4 MKII, often highlighting its robust build and long-lasting performance. Users appreciated the interface's ability to withstand regular use without showing signs of wear.

15% of users expressed concerns about durability, with some experiencing issues with wear and tear on specific components such as knobs or jacks after extended use, leading to worries about long-term reliability.

85%
Design Aesthetics

92% of users were impressed by the design aesthetics of the Audient iD4 MKII, commending its sleek and professional look. The interface's modern design and user-friendly layout made it an attractive addition to any studio setup.

8% of users were less satisfied with the design aesthetics, with some preferring a more traditional look or different color options. A few users mentioned that the design, while modern, might not appeal to those with more classic tastes.

92%
Latency

87% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the Audient iD4 MKII, noting minimal delay during recording and playback. This feature was particularly appreciated by musicians and producers requiring real-time monitoring.

13% of users experienced dissatisfaction with latency, although issues were often linked to specific system setups or software configurations rather than the interface itself, leading to mixed experiences.

87%
Compatibility with Instruments

90% of users were pleased with the compatibility of the Audient iD4 MKII with various instruments, highlighting its ability to handle different input types with ease. The high-quality preamps were particularly praised for their performance with guitars and microphones.

10% of users reported dissatisfaction with instrument compatibility, often due to niche requirements or specific setups that did not align perfectly with the interface's capabilities, necessitating additional equipment or adjustments.

90%
Control Features

82% of users appreciated the control features of the Audient iD4 MKII, noting the ease of use and functionality provided by the interface's controls. The large rotary encoder was frequently praised for its precision and tactile feel.

18% of users were dissatisfied with the control features, expressing a desire for more advanced options or customizable settings. Some users felt the interface could benefit from additional dials or switches for more nuanced control.

82%
Preamp Quality

94% of users were highly satisfied with the preamp quality of the Audient iD4 MKII, often highlighting the clean and transparent sound it provided. The preamps were considered a standout feature, offering performance typically found in higher-end models.

6% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the preamp quality, typically due to specific preferences or compatibility issues with certain microphones. Some users felt that while the preamps were good, they didn't fully meet their personal expectations.

94%
Headphone Output Quality

89% of users were satisfied with the headphone output quality of the Audient iD4 MKII, praising its ability to drive a wide range of headphones with clarity and power. Users noted that the output remained clear even at higher volumes.

11% of users were not fully satisfied with the headphone output quality, with some experiencing issues with volume levels or distortion at higher settings. A few users felt that the output could benefit from additional power or clarity for studio-grade headphones.

89%
USB-C Connectivity

88% of users appreciated the USB-C connectivity of the Audient iD4 MKII, noting faster data transfer and a more stable connection compared to older USB standards. This feature was seen as a modern enhancement that aligned with current tech trends.

12% of users experienced dissatisfaction with the USB-C connectivity, often due to compatibility issues with older systems or the need for additional adapters. Some users felt that while USB-C is beneficial, it can pose challenges for those without compatible ports.

88%
Phantom Power

91% of users were satisfied with the phantom power feature of the Audient iD4 MKII, appreciating its reliable performance with condenser microphones. The ease of activation and consistent power delivery were noted as key benefits.

9% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the phantom power, mainly due to specific cases where the power delivery did not meet expectations for certain high-demand microphones, leading to concerns about its adequacy for all recording situations.

91%
Metering

78% of users were satisfied with the metering capabilities of the Audient iD4 MKII, mentioning that the visual feedback provided was adequate for most recording scenarios. Users found the metering useful for monitoring input levels during sessions.

22% of users were dissatisfied with the metering, feeling that more detailed or advanced metering options would enhance the interface's functionality. Some users desired a more intuitive or visually rich metering system for precise adjustments.

78%
Driver Stability

84% of users found the driver stability of the Audient iD4 MKII to be reliable, noting minimal issues with crashes or disconnects. Users appreciated the consistent performance across different software and operating system updates.

16% of users experienced dissatisfaction with driver stability, often encountering occasional drops or compatibility issues with specific DAWs. These instances, while not widespread, affected the overall user experience.

84%
Input/Output Options

80% of users were content with the input/output options of the Audient iD4 MKII, finding them suitable for a range of recording setups. The combination of XLR and instrument inputs was appreciated for its versatility.

20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the input/output options, often wishing for more flexibility or additional ports to accommodate complex setups. Some users felt that the interface could benefit from more input/output expandability.

80%
Durability of Connectors

86% of users were satisfied with the durability of the connectors on the Audient iD4 MKII, mentioning that they were built to withstand frequent use without degradation. The solid feel of the connectors was a highlight for many.

14% of users expressed concerns about the durability of the connectors, with some experiencing issues with loose connections or wear over time. A few users suggested that more robust materials could enhance longevity.

86%
Overall Satisfaction

89% of users reported overall satisfaction with the Audient iD4 MKII, emphasizing its balance of quality, performance, and value. Users appreciated its ease of use and the high-quality audio it delivered, making it a favorite among many.

11% of users were not entirely satisfied overall, often due to specific feature limitations or personal preferences not being met. Some users felt that while the interface performed well, certain aspects could be improved to better meet their needs.

89%

Pros:
Compact and portable design, ideal for mobile recording. High-quality preamps with low noise and high headroom. USB Type-C connectivity for faster data transfer and reliable connection. Includes a suite of software and virtual instruments for added value. MIDI I/O allows for integration with other MIDI gear. Direct monitoring with no latency.	High-quality preamps and AD/DA converters. Compact and portable design. USB-C connectivity for faster data transfer and power. Direct monitoring with zero-latency. Robust build quality.

Cons:
Limited to 2 inputs and 2 outputs, which may not be sufficient for larger recording setups. USB Type-C cable not included, which may require additional purchase. No dedicated power supply option, relies solely on USB power. Plastic construction may not be as durable as metal alternatives. Some users may find the included software bundle unnecessary if they already own similar tools.	Limited to two input channels. No MIDI input/output. Requires external power when used with some iOS devices. Higher price point compared to some competitors.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 96 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	96 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	1 Preamp
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)	1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel) 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
OS Compatibility
macOS Windows	macOS 10.11.6 or Later macOS 11.1 or Later Windows 7 or Later 6 or Later iPadOS
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

The Arturia MiniFuse 2 and the Audient iD4 MKII are both robust USB-C audio interfaces, but they differ in several key specifications that could influence a user's decision based on specific needs.
Starting with the Arturia MiniFuse 2, it offers a higher maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit, compared to the Audient iD4 MKII’s 96 kHz at 24-bit. This makes the MiniFuse 2 more suitable for users requiring higher resolution audio recording. The MiniFuse 2 also features 2 microphone preamps, while the iD4 MKII has only 1. This gives the MiniFuse 2 an advantage for users who need to record multiple microphones simultaneously.
In terms of analog audio I/O, the MiniFuse 2 provides 2 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced mic/line/Hi-Z inputs on the front panel, which offers flexibility for different types of audio sources. It also includes 2 balanced 1/4" TRS line outputs and one unbalanced 1/4" TRS headphone output on the front panel. In contrast, the iD4 MKII has 1 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line input and a separate 1/4" TRS unbalanced Hi-Z input on the front panel. Additionally, the iD4 MKII offers two types of headphone outputs: a 1/4" TRS unbalanced output and a 1/8" (3.5 mm) TRS unbalanced output, both on the front panel, catering to different headphone types.
When it comes to host connection, both interfaces utilize USB-C, ensuring compatibility with modern computing devices. The OS compatibility for both interfaces includes macOS and Windows, but the iD4 MKII also adds support for iPadOS, making it more versatile for mobile recording setups.
Lastly, both interfaces are powered via USB bus power, making them equally convenient for portable use without the need for an external power source.
In summary, the Arturia MiniFuse 2 stands out with its higher sampling rate and dual microphone inputs, making it apt for more demanding recording tasks. The Audient iD4 MKII, while offering a slightly lower sampling rate, provides dual headphone outputs and compatibility with iPadOS, appealing to users who seek flexibility in monitoring and mobile recording.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 96 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	96 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	1 Preamp
Input Level Adjustment
2x Knob	2x Knob
Expansion Slots

When comparing the Arturia MiniFuse 2 Portable 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface with the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface, several key features stand out.
The Arturia MiniFuse 2 offers 2 analog channels for both inputs and outputs, providing greater flexibility for recording and monitoring. It supports a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit resolution, which is higher than the Audient iD4 MKII's 96 kHz at 24-bit resolution. This makes the MiniFuse 2 potentially more suitable for projects requiring higher audio fidelity. Additionally, the MiniFuse 2 includes 2 microphone preamps, which is double the number provided by the Audient iD4 MKII, making it a better option for users who need to record multiple microphone sources simultaneously. Input level adjustment is managed via 2 knobs, offering straightforward control over the input levels.
On the other hand, the Audient iD4 MKII also features 2 analog channels for both inputs and outputs, but it operates at a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz at 24-bit resolution. While this is lower than the MiniFuse 2, it is still suitable for most professional audio applications. The iD4 MKII includes only 1 microphone preamp, which might limit its use in multi-microphone recording scenarios. Similar to the MiniFuse 2, the iD4 MKII also provides 2 knobs for input level adjustment, ensuring ease of use. Neither device includes expansion slots.
In summary, the Arturia MiniFuse 2 offers higher sampling rates and more microphone inputs compared to the Audient iD4 MKII, making it more versatile for high-fidelity recording and multi-microphone setups. Conversely, the Audient iD4 MKII, while offering a lower maximum sampling rate and fewer microphone inputs, still provides strong performance suitable for most recording tasks. Both devices share a similar layout for input level adjustment and lack expansion slots.

Signal Processing
Pad

Gain/Trim Range
Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs: 56 dB	Mic/Hi-Z Inputs: 58 dB Hi-Z Inputs: 40 dB
High-Pass Filter

Solo/Mute
	Mute per Master

The Arturia MiniFuse 2 Portable 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface share several similarities but also have distinct differences in their features.
First, both interfaces do not include a pad feature, which is a commonality between the two. In terms of gain/trim range, the Arturia MiniFuse 2 offers a gain range of 56 dB for its mic/line/Hi-Z inputs. On the other hand, the Audient iD4 MKII provides a slightly higher gain range for its mic/Hi-Z inputs at 58 dB, while its Hi-Z inputs specifically have a gain range of 40 dB.
Neither of the interfaces includes a high-pass filter, making them straightforward in this regard. When it comes to solo/mute functionalities, the Arturia MiniFuse 2 does not offer solo or mute options. In contrast, the Audient iD4 MKII includes a mute function per master, adding a level of control for users who may need to mute their master output.
In summary, while both the Arturia MiniFuse 2 and the Audient iD4 MKII lack pad and high-pass filter features, they differ in gain/trim range and solo/mute functionalities, with the Audient iD4 MKII offering a slightly higher gain range and a master mute feature.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)	1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel) 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Phantom Power
48 V, Selectable On/Off (Applied to All Inputs)	48 V ± 4 V, Selectable On/Off
Digital Audio I/O

Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0	USB 3.0 / 3.1/3.2 Gen 1
USB (Non-Host)
1x USB-A (USB 2.0, Device Connection)
Sync I/O

Network I/O

MIDI I/O
1x DIN 5-Pin Input 1x DIN 5-Pin Output

When comparing the Arturia MiniFuse 2 Portable 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface, several key differences and similarities emerge in their specifications.
Analog Audio I/O: The Arturia MiniFuse 2 offers 2x combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced mic/line/Hi-Z inputs on the front panel, giving users a versatile input setup for different types of audio sources. It also features 2x 1/4" TRS balanced line outputs and a single 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output on the front panel. In contrast, the Audient iD4 MKII provides 1x combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line input, and a dedicated 1/4" TRS unbalanced Hi-Z input on the front panel. For outputs, it includes 2x 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs, 1x 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output, and an additional 1/8" (3.5 mm) TRS unbalanced headphone output on the front panel, which offers more flexibility for headphone monitoring.
Phantom Power: Both interfaces provide 48 V phantom power for condenser microphones, with the Arturia MiniFuse 2 offering selectable on/off phantom power applied to all inputs. The Audient iD4 MKII also offers selectable 48 V phantom power, with the specification of ±4 V and 10 mA current per channel, giving a slight edge in detailed power specifications.
Digital Audio I/O: Neither the Arturia MiniFuse 2 nor the Audient iD4 MKII includes digital audio I/O options, keeping their focus on analog connections.
Host Connection: Both interfaces utilize USB-C for their host connection. The Arturia MiniFuse 2 uses USB 2.0 protocol, while the Audient iD4 MKII supports USB 3.0/3.1/3.2 Gen 1, potentially offering higher data transfer rates and lower latency.
USB (Non-Host): The Arturia MiniFuse 2 includes a USB-A (USB 2.0) device connection, which can be used for connecting additional USB devices, whereas the Audient iD4 MKII does not offer any non-host USB connections.
Sync I/O and Network I/O: Neither device includes sync I/O or network I/O capabilities, focusing instead on straightforward audio interfacing.
MIDI I/O: A notable difference is that the Arturia MiniFuse 2 includes 1x DIN 5-pin MIDI input and 1x DIN 5-pin MIDI output, facilitating connectivity with MIDI devices. The Audient iD4 MKII does not offer any MIDI I/O, which might be a consideration for users needing MIDI capabilities.
In summary, the Arturia MiniFuse 2 is more versatile in terms of input options and MIDI connectivity, while the Audient iD4 MKII provides additional headphone output flexibility and supports a potentially faster USB connection protocol. The choice between these two interfaces will depend on specific needs such as MIDI connectivity, input variety, and data transfer preferences.

Performance
Frequency Response
Mic Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB (Min Gain) Hi-Z Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB (Min Gain) Line Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.05 dB (Min Gain) Line Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.09 dB Headphone Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.09 dB	A/D Converters: 10 Hz to 40 kHz ±0.5 dB D/A Converters: 10 Hz to 40 kHz ±0.1 dB Headphone Outputs: 10 Hz to 40 kHz ±0.1 dB Mic, Line Inputs: 10 Hz to 40 kHz ±0.5 dB (Min Gain) Hi-Z Inputs: 10 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.5 dB (Min Gain)
Maximum Input Level
Mic Inputs: +9 dBu Hi-Z Inputs: +11.5 dBu Line Inputs: +22 dBu	Mic Inputs: +12 dBu Line Inputs: +21 dBu Hi-Z Inputs: +12 dBu
Maximum Output Level
Line Outputs: +12 dBu Headphone Outputs: +11.4 dBu	Headphone Outputs: +5.46 Vrms (600-Ohm Load)
Headphone Output Power
137 mW into 33 Ohms	223 mW into 30 Ohms (Max) 280 mW into 62 Ohms (Max) 100 mW into 600 Ohms (Max)
Impedance
Mic Inputs: 2.5 Kilohms Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohm Line Inputs: 16 Kilohms Line Outputs: 94 Ohms Headphone Outputs: 10 Ohms	Mic Inputs: 2.8 Kilohms (Balanced) Line Inputs: > 8 Kilohms (Balanced)
Dynamic Range
Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs: 110 dB (A-Weighted) Line Outputs: 107.5 dB (A-Weighted) Headphone Outputs: 104 dB (A-Weighted)	A/D Converters: 120 dB (A-Weighted) D/A Converters: 125.5 dB (A-Weighted) Headphone Outputs: 125.5 dB (A-Weighted)
THD+N
Mic Inputs: -100 dB (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Typical) Hi-Z Inputs: -91 dB (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Typical) Line Inputs: -100 dB (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Typical) Line Outputs: -101 dB (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Typical)	Mic/Line Inputs: 0.0017% (at 0 dBu) Hi-Z Inputs: 0.1% (at 0 dBu) A/D Converters: < 0.001% (at -1 dBFS) D/A Converters: < 0.0006% (at -1 dBFS) Headphone Outputs: < 0.0009% (at -1 dBFS)
EIN
Mic Inputs: -129 dB A-Weighted	Mic/Line Inputs: -129 dB A-Weighted

The Arturia MiniFuse 2 Portable 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface each bring strong feature sets to the table, catering to different needs and preferences within the audio community.
In terms of frequency response, the Arturia MiniFuse 2 offers a range of 20 Hz to 20 kHz across its various inputs and outputs, maintaining a flat response with minimal deviation. Conversely, the Audient iD4 MKII extends its frequency response from 10 Hz to 40 kHz for most of its components, providing a broader spectrum that might benefit users requiring more extended high and low-frequency fidelity.
Regarding maximum input levels, the Arturia MiniFuse 2 provides +9 dBu for mic inputs, +11.5 dBu for Hi-Z inputs, and +22 dBu for line inputs. The Audient iD4 MKII, on the other hand, offers slightly higher maximum input levels with +12 dBu for both mic and Hi-Z inputs, and +21 dBu for line inputs. This could mean the iD4 MKII is slightly better at handling hotter signals without distortion.
For maximum output levels, the MiniFuse 2 outputs +12 dBu for line outputs and +11.4 dBu for headphone outputs, whereas the iD4 MKII offers a more robust output with +5.46 Vrms for headphone outputs, which translates to a higher voltage and potentially louder output.
Headphone output power is another differentiating factor. The MiniFuse 2 provides 137 mW into 33 Ohms, sufficient for most monitoring tasks. The iD4 MKII, however, offers significantly higher power with 223 mW into 30 Ohms and 280 mW into 62 Ohms, which can drive more demanding headphones with ease.
Impedance-wise, the Arturia MiniFuse 2 has mic inputs at 2.5 kOhms, Hi-Z inputs at 1 MOhm, line inputs at 16 kOhms, and line outputs at 94 Ohms. The Audient iD4 MKII’s mic inputs are at 2.8 kOhms and line inputs at greater than 8 kOhms, indicating slightly different handling of input sources.
In terms of dynamic range, the MiniFuse 2 offers 110 dB (A-Weighted) for mic/line/Hi-Z inputs, 107.5 dB for line outputs, and 104 dB for headphone outputs. The Audient iD4 MKII boasts superior dynamic range specs with 120 dB for A/D converters, 125.5 dB for D/A converters, and 125.5 dB for headphone outputs, which indicates a broader range of signal handling without noise, particularly beneficial for critical listening and recording.
THD+N values highlight that the MiniFuse 2 maintains a typical -100 dB for mic and line inputs and outputs, whereas the iD4 MKII showcases extremely low distortion at 0.0017% for mic/line inputs and impressive values for its converters and headphone outputs (< 0.0009% at -1 dBFS).
Finally, the Equivalent Input Noise (EIN) for both interfaces is similar, with both boasting an impressive -129 dB A-Weighted, which ensures very low noise levels during recording.
Overall, both interfaces offer high-quality audio performance, with the Audient iD4 MKII leading in dynamic range, headphone output power, and frequency response, making it a strong candidate for professional applications. The Arturia MiniFuse 2, while slightly behind in some specs, still offers robust performance suitable for a wide range of recording tasks.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 / 176.4 / 192 kHz	44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 kHz
Sample Rate Conversion

Bit Depths
24-Bit	24-Bit
Latency
Zero-Latency Direct Monitoring	0.65 ms at 44.1 kHz (Dependent on Buffer Size, Input to Output) 0.31 ms at 96 kHz (Dependent on Buffer Size, Input to Output)
Sync Sources
Internal	Internal

The Arturia MiniFuse 2 Portable 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface both offer high-quality audio performance, but they have distinct differences in their specifications.
In terms of sample rates, the Arturia MiniFuse 2 stands out with a broader range, supporting 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, 176.4, and 192 kHz. In contrast, the Audient iD4 MKII supports sample rates of 44.1, 48, 88.2, and 96 kHz. This makes the MiniFuse 2 more versatile if higher sample rates are a priority.
Both interfaces support a bit depth of 24-bit, ensuring high-resolution audio quality. However, when it comes to latency, the Audient iD4 MKII provides specific latency figures, with 0.65 ms at 44.1 kHz and 0.31 ms at 96 kHz, which is dependent on buffer size. The Arturia MiniFuse 2, on the other hand, emphasizes zero-latency direct monitoring, which is an essential feature for real-time audio monitoring without any noticeable delay.
Regarding sync sources, both devices use internal synchronization. This is typical for compact audio interfaces designed for home studios or portable use, ensuring reliable performance without the need for external clocking devices.
Overall, the Arturia MiniFuse 2 offers a broader range of sample rates and zero-latency monitoring, making it a versatile choice for a variety of recording scenarios. The Audient iD4 MKII, while limited to lower maximum sample rates, provides detailed latency specifications, which may appeal to users who need precise information on performance metrics.

Audio Storage & Playback
Memory Card Slot

When comparing the Arturia MiniFuse 2 Portable 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface, both products share a common feature: neither includes a memory card slot. This similarity in design indicates that both interfaces are geared more towards direct USB recording and playback rather than standalone recording solutions that require expandable memory via memory cards.
The Arturia MiniFuse 2 is a compact and portable interface featuring a 2x2 configuration, which means it offers two inputs and two outputs. It connects via USB Type-C, ensuring a fast and reliable connection to modern computers. Additionally, it includes MIDI I/O, making it suitable for users who need to connect MIDI devices such as keyboards or controllers. The absence of a memory card slot aligns with its primary function as a direct recording interface, emphasizing seamless integration with digital audio workstations (DAWs) on a computer.
On the other hand, the Audient iD4 MKII is also a 2x2 USB interface connecting via USB-C, designed to offer high-quality audio conversion and preamp performance in a compact form. Like the MiniFuse 2, it does not feature a memory card slot, indicating its focus on real-time recording and monitoring when connected to a computer. The iD4 MKII is known for its high-quality Audient mic preamps and JFET DI, catering to users who prioritize exceptional audio fidelity.
In summary, both the Arturia MiniFuse 2 and the Audient iD4 MKII lack memory card slots, reinforcing their design intent as computer-dependent audio interfaces. The MiniFuse 2 stands out with its added MIDI I/O capabilities, while the iD4 MKII is distinguished by its high-quality preamps and DI. Both interfaces leverage USB-C connectivity to ensure fast and efficient data transfer, making them suitable choices for modern recording setups.

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS Windows	macOS 10.11.6 or Later macOS 11.1 or Later Windows 7 or Later 6 or Later iPadOS
Required Hardware
Available USB 2.0 Port USB Cable (Included)	Available USB-C Port USB Cable (Included)
Internet Connection
Required for Registration, Software/Driver Download	Required for Registration, Software/Driver Download

The Arturia MiniFuse 2 Portable 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface are both high-quality audio interfaces designed to cater to the needs of musicians, producers, and audio engineers. They each have their own set of specifications and features that make them suitable for various setups and workflows.
In terms of OS compatibility, the Arturia MiniFuse 2 is compatible with macOS and Windows operating systems. On the other hand, the Audient iD4 MKII supports not only macOS (10.11.6 or later, and macOS 11.1 or later) and Windows (7 or later) but also iPadOS, making it more versatile for mobile device users. The Audient iD4 MKII also specifies processor requirements, supporting both Intel and Apple M1 processors on Mac and requiring a 1.6 GHz Intel Core 2 processor for PC.
When it comes to required hardware, both interfaces come with an included USB cable. The Arturia MiniFuse 2 requires an available USB 2.0 port, while the Audient iD4 MKII needs a USB-C port. This distinction could be significant depending on the available ports on your computer or device.
Both devices require an internet connection for registration and software/driver downloads. However, the Audient iD4 MKII has an additional specification regarding RAM requirements, with a minimum of 1 GB of RAM needed. Additionally, the Audient iD4 MKII is compatible with mobile devices such as iPads and iPhones, enhancing its portability and convenience for on-the-go recording.
In summary, while both the Arturia MiniFuse 2 and the Audient iD4 MKII provide robust audio interface solutions, the Audient iD4 MKII offers broader OS and device compatibility, specific processor and RAM requirements, and includes support for mobile devices, which may make it a more flexible option for users with diverse recording needs.

Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

When comparing the Arturia MiniFuse 2 Portable 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface, there are several aspects to consider, particularly focusing on their power requirements and other features.
Both the Arturia MiniFuse 2 and the Audient iD4 MKII are designed to be powered via USB bus power. This means they do not require an external power supply and can be powered directly through a USB connection to a computer. This feature makes both interfaces highly portable and convenient for mobile recording setups.
The Arturia MiniFuse 2 offers a 2x2 configuration, which means it has two inputs and two outputs. This configuration is ideal for solo musicians or small ensembles who need to record multiple sources simultaneously. It also includes MIDI I/O, which is a significant advantage for users who need to connect MIDI controllers or other MIDI hardware.
On the other hand, the Audient iD4 MKII also features a 2x2 configuration but is well-known for its high-quality preamps and converters, which are often praised for their clarity and low noise performance. While it does not include MIDI I/O, it makes up for this with its robust build quality and the inclusion of a JFET DI input, which is ideal for guitar and bass players looking to capture their instrument's tone accurately.
In summary, both interfaces are powered via USB bus power, making them equally portable and convenient for users on the go. The choice between the Arturia MiniFuse 2 and the Audient iD4 MKII will largely depend on the specific needs of the user. The MiniFuse 2 offers the added benefit of MIDI I/O, whereas the iD4 MKII excels in audio quality and includes a JFET DI input, catering to different recording preferences and requirements.

Physical
Anti-Theft Features
Kensington Security Slot	Kensington Security Slot
Dimensions
7.9 x 3.9 x 1.6" / 20.1 x 9.9 x 4.1 cm	5.2 x 4.7 x 2.4" / 13.3 x 12 x 6 cm (Including Controls and Protrusions)
Weight
1.1 lb / 0.5 kg	2.2 lb / 1.0 kg

When comparing the Arturia MiniFuse 2 Portable 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface, several key features stand out. Both devices include anti-theft features in the form of a Kensington Security Slot, ensuring they can be securely fastened in various environments.
In terms of dimensions, the Arturia MiniFuse 2 measures 7.9 x 3.9 x 1.6 inches (20.1 x 9.9 x 4.1 cm), making it relatively compact. The Audient iD4 MKII, on the other hand, is slightly smaller in length but taller and wider, measuring 5.2 x 4.7 x 2.4 inches (13.3 x 12 x 6 cm), including controls and protrusions. This difference in size may influence portability preferences based on the user's needs.
Weight-wise, the Arturia MiniFuse 2 weighs 1.1 lb (0.5 kg), making it lighter compared to the Audient iD4 MKII, which weighs 2.2 lb (1.0 kg). This weight difference could be significant for users who prioritize portability and ease of transport for on-the-go recording sessions.
Overall, while both interfaces offer similar anti-theft security, the Arturia MiniFuse 2 is lighter and slightly more compact, which might appeal to users looking for a more portable solution. The Audient iD4 MKII, though heavier and slightly bulkier, might be preferred by those who do not prioritize weight and size as much.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
1.29 lb	1.92 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
9 x 5.3 x 1.9"	7.5 x 6 x 3.5"

When comparing the Arturia MiniFuse 2 Portable 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface to the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface, several key differences and similarities can be highlighted regarding their physical specifications.
The Arturia MiniFuse 2 is a lightweight and compact option, with a package weight of just 1.29 lb. Its dimensions are fairly streamlined, measuring 9 x 5.3 x 1.9 inches. This makes it an easily portable choice for musicians and producers who need to carry their interface around without hassle. Its slim profile allows it to fit comfortably into most bags, making it ideal for on-the-go use.
In contrast, the Audient iD4 MKII has a slightly heavier package weight of 1.92 lb, which may reflect its robust build quality. The box dimensions for the iD4 MKII are 7.5 x 6 x 3.5 inches. While still portable, the Audient iD4 MKII is a bit bulkier compared to the MiniFuse 2. The increased size might offer more physical controls or a more solid construction, appealing to users who prioritize durability alongside portability.
Both interfaces utilize USB-C connectivity, ensuring fast data transfer and compatibility with modern devices. However, the physical footprint and weight differences between the two may influence a user's decision based on their specific portability needs and space considerations.