Elgato Wave XLR vs Focusrite Scarlett 2i2: A Comprehensive Audio Interface Comparison

Elgato Wave XLR vs Focusrite Scarlett 2i2: A Comprehensive Audio Interface Comparison

The Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface is a popular choice for those who prioritize a streamlined setup tailored toward content creators and streamers. This audio interface is designed to integrate seamlessly with the Elgato ecosystem, offering features like capacitive mute, customizable clipguard technology to prevent distortion, and real-time monitoring. Its single XLR input is ideal for those who primarily use one microphone. The unit's simplicity makes it user-friendly, especially for beginners who wish to enhance their audio quality without dealing with complex settings.


On the other hand, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) is known for its superior sound quality and versatility. It features two XLR/line inputs, allowing users to connect multiple microphones or instruments simultaneously, making it perfect for musicians, podcasters, and those who require more flexibility in their recordings. The 4th generation boasts improved preamps, which deliver a cleaner sound, and the Air mode gives recordings a brighter, more open sound. With its robust build and professional-level specifications, the Scarlett 2i2 continues to be a favorite among both home studio enthusiasts and professionals.


While both interfaces connect via USB-C, the choice between the two depends largely on the user's specific needs. The Elgato Wave XLR is ideal for content creators who want an easy-to-use device that integrates seamlessly with streaming software and requires minimal setup. It caters to those who focus on single-microphone setups. In contrast, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers more flexibility for those who need multiple inputs and are looking for studio-quality sound. It is also more suitable for those who might want to expand their setup in the future, given its additional input options and superior preamp quality.

In the following sections, we will delve into a detailed comparison of the Elgato Wave XLR and the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) USB-C Audio Interfaces. This article thoroughly examines all their specifications while also providing an insightful review of their respective advantages and disadvantages. Whether you are an audio professional or a passionate enthusiast, this comparison will help you determine which interface best suits your needs.

Detailed Analysis of Elgato Wave XLR and Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen)

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
  • Purchase Value

    85% of users appreciated the Elgato Wave XLR for its excellent value for money. Many satisfied users highlighted that the device offers professional-level audio features typically found in more expensive interfaces, making it a cost-effective choice for both beginners and experienced audio enthusiasts.

    15% of users felt that the purchase value was not justified. They expressed dissatisfaction due to the lack of certain advanced features they expected at this price point, such as multiple input options, which limited its use for more complex audio setups.

    85%
  • Quality of Materials

    90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Elgato Wave XLR. They praised its robust construction and premium feel, noting that the materials contribute to both its durability and aesthetic appeal, making it a reliable choice for long-term use.

    10% of users reported dissatisfaction with the materials, primarily due to concerns about the durability of certain components like knobs and connectors, which they found to be less sturdy than expected, potentially affecting the longevity of the product.

    90%
  • Ease of Use

    92% of users found the Elgato Wave XLR extremely user-friendly. The interface's intuitive design and straightforward setup process were frequently mentioned, allowing users to quickly integrate it into their audio systems without extensive technical knowledge.

    8% of users experienced difficulties with the initial setup and configuration, finding the lack of a detailed manual or confusing software interface to be barriers to a seamless user experience.

    92%
  • Audio Quality

    95% of users were highly satisfied with the audio quality provided by the Elgato Wave XLR. Users commended the device for delivering crisp, clear sound with minimal latency, making it an excellent choice for streaming, podcasting, and professional audio recording.

    5% of users experienced issues with audio quality, citing occasional static or interference that detracted from the overall sound experience. These users felt the device did not consistently meet their high expectations for audio fidelity.

    95%
  • Software Integration

    88% of users praised the seamless software integration of the Elgato Wave XLR. The accompanying software was noted for its compatibility and ease of use, providing users with powerful tools to enhance their audio settings and customize their recording environment effectively.

    12% of users were dissatisfied with the software integration, reporting compatibility issues with certain operating systems and a lack of updates that hindered their ability to fully utilize the device's potential.

    88%
  • Design

    93% of users were impressed by the sleek and modern design of the Elgato Wave XLR. They appreciated its compact size, which allows it to fit neatly into any workspace without compromising on functionality or aesthetic appeal.

    7% of users were not pleased with the design, citing that while it is visually appealing, the layout of controls and ports could be more ergonomic, leading to occasional inconvenience during use.

    93%
  • Durability

    87% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Elgato Wave XLR. They noticed that the device withstood regular use without showing signs of wear, and the high-quality build contributed to their confidence in its longevity.

    13% of users reported concerns about the durability, particularly with moving parts like knobs and switches, which they felt might not withstand heavy use over time, raising doubts about the product's long-term reliability.

    87%
  • Portability

    80% of users valued the portability of the Elgato Wave XLR. Its compact and lightweight design was praised for making it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions or traveling, adding to its versatility.

    20% of users found the portability lacking, as they desired a more rugged design that could withstand frequent transportation without risking damage, or additional protective accessories to ensure safe travel.

    80%
  • Customer Support

    82% of users were pleased with the customer support offered by Elgato. They found the support team to be responsive and helpful in resolving queries and issues, enhancing their overall experience with the product.

    18% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses and inadequate solutions to technical problems, which left them frustrated and less confident in the brand's commitment to customer service.

    82%
  • Compatibility

    89% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Elgato Wave XLR with various operating systems and audio equipment. They found it worked seamlessly with popular DAWs and other audio hardware, making it a flexible choice for different setups.

    11% of users encountered compatibility issues, particularly with older operating systems or specific audio software, which limited their ability to integrate the device into their existing setups without additional troubleshooting.

    89%
  • Build Quality

    91% of users appreciated the build quality of the Elgato Wave XLR. The device was noted for its solid construction and high-quality components, which contributed to a sense of reliability and trust in its performance.

    9% of users were not fully satisfied with the build quality, pointing out minor issues like loose fittings or a fragile feel in certain parts, which detracted from their overall confidence in the product's durability.

    91%
  • Latency

    94% of users were delighted with the low latency performance of the Elgato Wave XLR, which provided an uninterrupted and smooth audio experience crucial for real-time applications like streaming and live recording.

    6% of users noted occasional latency issues, especially when used with certain software or during complex audio processing tasks, which affected their ability to maintain a seamless recording or streaming experience.

    94%
  • Functionality

    88% of users were satisfied with the functionality of the Elgato Wave XLR, appreciating the range of features it offers for managing audio inputs and outputs efficiently, making it a versatile tool for various audio tasks.

    12% of users felt the functionality was limited, particularly in terms of lacking additional inputs or outputs that would accommodate more complex audio setups, which restricted its use for advanced audio projects.

    88%
  • Control Features

    86% of users were satisfied with the control features of the Elgato Wave XLR. They found the controls to be intuitive and effective for adjusting audio settings quickly, enhancing their ability to manage audio levels on the fly.

    14% of users were not entirely satisfied with the control features, mentioning that the limited number of physical controls required them to rely more on software, which was not always convenient for their workflow.

    86%
  • Aesthetic Appeal

    90% of users appreciated the aesthetic appeal of the Elgato Wave XLR. The sleek, modern design complemented their existing setups, adding a professional look to their audio equipment collection.

    10% of users were less impressed with the aesthetic appeal, feeling that while the design was modern, it lacked unique elements or personalization options that would make it stand out in a competitive market.

    90%
  • Pricing

    84% of users felt the pricing of the Elgato Wave XLR was reasonable given the quality and features offered. They believed it represented a fair investment for those seeking high-quality audio recording capabilities without breaking the bank.

    16% of users were dissatisfied with the pricing, arguing that similar features could be found in less expensive alternatives, which offered better value for budget-conscious consumers.

    84%
  • Noise Reduction

    89% of users were satisfied with the noise reduction capabilities of the Elgato Wave XLR. They reported a significant reduction in background noise, allowing for clearer and more professional audio recordings.

    11% of users found the noise reduction to be insufficient, particularly in noisy environments, where they expected better isolation and filtering to maintain audio clarity.

    89%
  • Compatibility with Accessories

    85% of users were pleased with the compatibility of the Elgato Wave XLR with various audio accessories. They appreciated its ability to integrate smoothly with popular microphones and headphones, expanding its usability.

    15% of users encountered issues with accessory compatibility, noting that certain microphones or headphones did not work as well as expected, requiring additional adapters or settings adjustments.

    85%
  • Input/Output Options

    83% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the Elgato Wave XLR. They found the existing ports sufficient for their basic audio needs, allowing for straightforward connections with essential audio gear.

    17% of users were dissatisfied with the limited input/output options, expressing a desire for additional ports to connect more devices simultaneously, which would enhance its functionality for complex audio projects.

    83%
  • Overall Satisfaction

    90% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Elgato Wave XLR, noting that it met or exceeded their expectations in terms of performance, design, and ease of use, making it a worthwhile addition to their audio setup.

    10% of users were not fully satisfied overall, due to a combination of minor issues like limited features or occasional technical difficulties, which affected their experience and perception of the product's value.

    90%
  • Purchase Value

    85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the balance between affordability and functionality, making it an excellent choice for both beginners and professionals. Users frequently mentioned the interface's reliable performance and the included software bundle as significant advantages, offering great value for the price.

    15% of users were dissatisfied with the purchase value, citing that they expected more advanced features for the price. Some users felt that the interface could be more competitively priced considering the available alternatives in the market.

    85%
  • Quality of Materials

    90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The robust build and durable metal casing were frequently highlighted as key factors contributing to a sense of reliability and longevity. Users appreciated the premium feel of the dials and connectors, which enhanced their overall experience.

    10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of materials, noting that some components felt slightly less durable over time. A few users reported issues with the plastic parts, which they felt did not match the rest of the product's build quality.

    90%
  • Ease of Use

    88% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface easy to use. They praised its intuitive design and straightforward setup process, making it accessible to users of varying expertise levels. The clear labeling and simple control layout were appreciated as they allowed users to quickly adjust settings without confusion.

    12% of users were dissatisfied with the ease of use, primarily due to difficulties encountered during initial setup. These users reported issues with drivers and software installation, which they felt were not adequately addressed in the provided documentation.

    88%
  • Sound Quality

    92% of users were impressed with the sound quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, noting its clear and crisp audio output as a standout feature. Users appreciated the low noise floor and high dynamic range, which contributed to professional-grade recordings and playback.

    8% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, mentioning occasional latency issues and minor distortion at high volumes. Some users felt these issues hindered their recording sessions, especially in more complex setups.

    92%
  • Compatibility

    87% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing its seamless integration with various DAWs and operating systems as a major advantage. Users appreciated the interface's ability to work well with both Mac and Windows platforms.

    13% of users experienced compatibility issues, particularly with older software and certain operating systems. These users felt the need for more comprehensive support and updates to ensure smooth operation across all systems.

    87%
  • Portability

    85% of users praised the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, highlighting its compact size and lightweight design. This made it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions or gigs, which was a significant plus for users frequently on the move.

    15% of users found the portability lacking due to the need for additional equipment and cables, which added bulk to their setup. Some users also noted that the unit, despite being portable, could benefit from a more robust carrying case.

    85%
  • Durability

    88% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often commenting on its sturdy construction. Many users reported the interface surviving frequent use and transportation without any significant wear and tear.

    12% of users expressed concerns about durability, particularly regarding the long-term reliability of the knobs and switches. Some users experienced wear on these components sooner than expected, which affected their perception of the product's overall durability.

    88%
  • Aesthetics

    90% of users were pleased with the aesthetics of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often mentioning its sleek and modern design. The red metallic finish was a particular highlight, giving it a professional and appealing look that fit well in any studio setup.

    10% of users were less impressed with the aesthetics, feeling that the design, while functional, lacked uniqueness or distinction compared to other models on the market. Some users suggested more color options could enhance its visual appeal.

    90%
  • Customer Support

    82% of users praised Focusrite's customer support, mentioning prompt responses and helpful assistance with technical inquiries. Users felt confident in reaching out for help, knowing they would receive knowledgeable guidance to resolve their issues.

    18% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses and unhelpful troubleshooting advice. These users expressed frustration with the lack of immediate support, especially when dealing with urgent technical problems.

    82%
  • Latency

    89% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found it capable of handling real-time monitoring and recording without noticeable delays, which was crucial for professional audio work.

    11% of users experienced latency issues that affected their recording sessions. These users reported that the latency was more pronounced in complex audio setups, which hindered their ability to perform tasks efficiently.

    89%
  • Driver Stability

    83% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The majority of users reported consistent performance with minimal crashes or connectivity issues, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions.

    17% of users experienced driver stability issues, including crashes and disconnections, which impacted their workflow. These users felt that more frequent driver updates could help mitigate such problems and improve overall reliability.

    83%
  • Preamp Quality

    91% of users were highly satisfied with the preamp quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted the clean and transparent sound the preamps provided, which allowed for accurate capture of vocals and instruments without coloration.

    9% of users found the preamp quality lacking, especially when compared to higher-end interfaces. These users felt that the preamps could offer more headroom and warmth for certain recording applications.

    91%
  • Software Bundle

    86% of users appreciated the software bundle included with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the DAW and plugin offerings to be a valuable addition that enhanced their recording and production capabilities right out of the box.

    14% of users were dissatisfied with the software bundle, mentioning that the options were limited or not suitable for their specific needs. Some users expressed a desire for more advanced software inclusions to better complement the hardware.

    86%
  • Input/Output Options

    84% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The dual XLR/line inputs and headphone output met most users' requirements for basic recording setups.

    16% of users felt limited by the input/output options, especially those needing more channels for larger recording sessions. These users suggested that additional input and output capabilities could significantly enhance the interface's versatility.

    84%
  • Phantom Power

    87% of users appreciated the inclusion of phantom power on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, enabling them to use condenser microphones effectively. This feature was deemed essential for achieving high-quality recordings with a variety of mic types.

    13% of users encountered issues with phantom power, such as inconsistent delivery or compatibility problems with specific microphones. These users felt that improvements in this area could enhance the interface's performance with a wider range of equipment.

    87%
  • USB-C Connectivity

    89% of users were pleased with the USB-C connectivity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Audio Interface, noting the faster data transfer and improved power efficiency. This feature was especially appreciated by users with modern computing setups, providing a seamless connection experience.

    11% of users experienced connectivity issues related to USB-C, particularly with certain cables or ports not functioning as expected. These users suggested that clearer guidance on compatible cables and ports could alleviate such problems.

    89%
  • Overall Satisfaction

    88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing it as a reliable and high-performance tool for their audio needs. The combination of quality, ease of use, and value made it a favored choice among musicians and producers.

    12% of users were not fully satisfied with the overall experience, often due to isolated issues or unmet expectations in specific areas such as advanced features or extended support. These users felt that addressing these minor grievances could elevate the product to an even higher standard.

    88%
  • Recording Quality

    91% of users were highly satisfied with the recording quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted its ability to capture detailed and accurate audio, making it suitable for various applications from podcasts to music production.

    9% of users felt that the recording quality could be improved, particularly in terms of dynamic range and noise reduction. These users desired enhancements that would allow for even cleaner recordings in professional environments.

    91%
  • Monitor Control

    86% of users appreciated the monitor control features of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, particularly the direct monitor switch and volume control. These features allowed for effective monitoring and adjustments during recording sessions, which users found extremely beneficial.

    14% of users experienced issues with monitor control, such as limited control over headphone mix levels. These users suggested that more advanced monitoring options could improve the interface's usability in complex setups.

    86%
  • Updates and Support

    80% of users were satisfied with the updates and support provided for the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the ongoing driver updates and support resources available, which helped maintain the interface's performance over time.

    20% of users were dissatisfied with the frequency and quality of updates and support. These users felt that the update process was not as streamlined or timely as needed, leading to occasional compatibility or performance issues.

    80%
  • Product Longevity

    87% of users were satisfied with the product longevity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, reporting that it remained functional and reliable over extended periods of use. This aspect contributed to users' confidence in their investment.

    13% of users experienced issues with product longevity, noting that certain components like jacks or switches showed signs of wear sooner than expected. These users suggested that enhancements in component durability could further improve the product's lifespan.

    87%
Show More
Pros:
  • High-quality audio conversion with 24-bit/96kHz resolution.
  • Easy integration with popular streaming software.
  • Customizable capacitive mute button for quick muting.
  • Wave Link software allows for advanced audio routing and mixing.
  • Compact and sleek design fits well on any desktop.
  • USB-C connectivity ensures fast and stable data transfer.
  • High-quality preamps for clear audio capture.
  • USB-C connectivity for faster data transfer and compatibility.
  • Compact and portable design.
  • Low latency monitoring.
  • Easy setup and user-friendly interface.
Cons:
  • Limited to a single XLR input, which may be restrictive for some users.
  • No built-in effects or processing options like some other interfaces.
  • Relatively higher price point compared to basic audio interfaces.
  • Requires the Wave Link software for full functionality, adding complexity.
  • No standalone power supply, reliant on USB power.
  • Limited to two inputs, which may not be enough for some users.
  • No MIDI input/output.
  • Higher price point compared to some competitors.
  • Requires external power when used with some devices.
Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog:
1 Input / 2 Outputs at 48/96 kHz
Analog:
2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit 192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
1 Preamp 2
Analog Audio I/O
1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Headphone Output
2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel)
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output
1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Host Connection
1x USB-C 1x USB-C
OS Compatibility
Windows 10 macOS
Windows
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)

The Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface features a compact design with a single analog input and dual outputs, supporting a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz at 24-bit resolution. It includes a 1 XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input and a 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Headphone Output, making it suitable for solo recording and streaming scenarios. The device is powered via USB Bus Power and is compatible with Windows 10 operating systems.Show More


In contrast, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) offers greater flexibility with two analog inputs and two outputs, allowing for simultaneous recording of two microphones or instruments. It boasts a higher maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit resolution, which is beneficial for high-fidelity audio capture. The interface features 2 XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Inputs and 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Inputs, along with 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Outputs and a 1/4" TRS Headphone Output, making it versatile for various recording setups. Additionally, it supports both macOS and Windows operating systems, and can be powered through USB Bus Power or an optional USB power adapter.


When comparing the two, the Elgato Wave XLR is tailored for users who require a straightforward, single-channel interface for streaming or basic recording tasks. In contrast, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 is designed for those who need more inputs, higher sampling rates, and greater versatility, making it a better choice for musicians and multi-source recording applications.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog:
1 Input / 2 Outputs at 48/96 kHz
Analog:
2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit 192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
1 Preamp 2
Built-In Microphone
Input Level Adjustment
1x Knob 2x Knob
Expansion Slots

The Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface is designed for users who need a straightforward solution for audio input and output. It features 1 Input and 2 Outputs, operating at a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz / 24-Bit. This interface is particularly suitable for single microphone setups, making it a good choice for podcasters and streamers who may not require multiple mic inputs. The interface includes 1 Preamp for enhanced audio quality and boasts a simple Input Level Adjustment with a single knob, allowing for easy management of sound levels.Show More


In contrast, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) offers a more robust feature set, making it suitable for a wider range of audio applications. It provides 2 Inputs and 2 Outputs and supports a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz / 24-Bit, which is ideal for high-fidelity recordings. This interface is equipped with 2 Microphone Inputs, allowing users to connect multiple microphones simultaneously, making it an excellent choice for collaborative projects such as music recordings or interviews. The Scarlett 2i2 also features 2 Knobs for Input Level Adjustment, providing individual control over each input channel.


While both audio interfaces lack a built-in microphone and expansion slots, the Elgato Wave XLR is tailored for simplicity with its single input setup, whereas the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers greater flexibility with dual inputs and higher sampling capabilities. Therefore, users should consider their specific needs—whether they prefer a straightforward, single-input design or a more versatile interface that can accommodate multiple microphones and higher audio quality.

Signal Processing
Gain/Trim Range
75 dB Mic/Line Inputs:
Up to +69 dB
Hi-Z Inputs:
62 dB

The Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface offers a maximum gain/trim range of 75 dB, providing sufficient amplification for capturing high-quality audio. However, it lacks a pad feature, which may limit its versatility in handling very loud sound sources. Additionally, it includes a high-pass filter that operates between 80 to 120 Hz, allowing users to eliminate low-frequency noise and improve the clarity of their recordings. The interface also features a mute function per master, giving users control over their audio output.Show More


In contrast, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) has a broader gain/trim range that accommodates different input types, with a maximum gain of up to +69 dB for mic/line inputs and 62 dB for Hi-Z inputs. This versatility makes it suitable for a wider array of instruments and microphones. Unlike the Elgato model, the Scarlett 2i2 does not specify a high-pass filter or mute function, which could be a consideration for users who prioritize these features.


Overall, while both audio interfaces have their unique strengths, the choice ultimately depends on the user's specific needs. The Elgato Wave XLR is tailored for users who require an efficient high-pass filter and a straightforward control mechanism, while the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 excels in providing a flexible gain range suitable for various audio sources.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Headphone Output
2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel)
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output
1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Phantom Power
48 V, Selectable On/Off 48 V, Selectable On/Off
Digital Audio I/O
Host Connection
1x USB-C 1x USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
USB 3.0 / 3.1/3.2 Gen 1 USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)
1x USB-C (Power Input)
Sync I/O
Network I/O
MIDI I/O

The Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface is designed for simplicity and efficiency, featuring a single XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input that caters primarily to solo vocalists or podcasters. It also includes a 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Headphone Output for monitoring purposes. The interface supports 48 V Phantom Power, which is selectable for use with condenser microphones. In terms of connectivity, it offers a USB-C host connection compliant with USB 3.0/3.1/3.2 Gen 1 standards, but lacks additional digital or network I/O capabilities.Show More


On the other hand, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) offers a more versatile setup with two XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Inputs and two 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Inputs on its front panel. This makes it suitable for recording multiple sources simultaneously. Additionally, it has two 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Outputs and a 1/4" TRS Headphone Output, enhancing its monitoring capabilities. Like the Elgato, it also features 48 V Phantom Power and connects via USB-C, but utilizes the older USB 2.0 protocol. It includes a USB-C input for power, providing more flexibility for power supply options.


In summary, the Elgato Wave XLR is tailored for users needing a straightforward, single-input solution, ideal for streaming or podcasting, while the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 presents a more robust feature set, accommodating multiple inputs and outputs, making it a better choice for musicians or those requiring extensive audio routing capabilities.

Performance
Frequency Response
20 Hz to 20 kHz XLR Mic Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB
1/4" Line Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.05 dB
1/4" Hi-Z Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.15 dB
Maximum Input Level
10 V XLR Mic:
16 dBu
1/4" Line:
22 dBu
1/4" Hi-Z:
12 dBu
Headphone Output Power
1/8" / 3.5 mm:
77 mW
1/4":
32 mW into 33 Ohms
22 mW into 300 Ohms
Dynamic Range
100 dB XLR Mic Inputs:
116 dBA
1/4" Line Inputs:
115.2 dBA
1/4" Hi-Z Inputs:
113 dBA
1/4" Line Outputs:
120 dB
1/4" Headphone:
112 dB (at 33 Ohms)
115 dB (at 300 Ohms)
Digital A/D Converters:
120 dB
Digital D/A Converters:
130 dBA

The Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface offers a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz, making it suitable for capturing a wide range of audio frequencies. Its maximum input level is 10 V, which allows for good signal handling without distortion. The dynamic range of this interface is 100 dB, ensuring that it can capture both quiet and loud sounds effectively. Additionally, the headphone output power is rated at 77 mW through a 1/8" / 3.5 mm output, providing sufficient volume for monitoring.Show More


In contrast, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) boasts a more detailed frequency response for different input types. The XLR mic inputs also have a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB, while the 1/4" line and Hi-Z inputs maintain a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz with minimal deviation. The maximum input levels are notably higher, with the XLR mic input reaching 16 dBu, the 1/4" line inputs at 22 dBu, and the Hi-Z inputs at 12 dBu. The Scarlett's dynamic range is impressive, particularly with XLR mic inputs at 116 dBA and line outputs at 120 dB.


When it comes to headphone output, the Scarlett 2i2 provides a more versatile output power of 32 mW into 33 Ohms and 22 mW into 300 Ohms, accommodating a wider range of headphones compared to the Elgato. The impedance for the Scarlett's XLR mic inputs is 3 Kilohms, while the 1/4" line inputs have an impedance of 60 Kilohms, and Hi-Z inputs at 1 Megohm. This makes it particularly suitable for various types of microphones and instruments.


In terms of total harmonic distortion plus noise (THD+N), the Scarlett 2i2 excels with ratings of -100 dB for XLR mic and line inputs, indicating a very clean signal. The EIN (Equivalent Input Noise) for the XLR mic inputs is rated at -127 dBu A-Weighted, further demonstrating its capability in low-noise environments. Overall, while both interfaces are excellent choices, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 provides higher input levels, a wider dynamic range, and more versatility in headphone output, making it a strong contender for more professional audio applications.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
48 / 96 kHz 44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 / 176.4 / 192 kHz
Bit Depths
24-Bit 24-Bit

The Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface supports sample rates of 48 and 96 kHz, providing good quality for recording and streaming purposes. However, it lacks sample rate conversion capabilities, which may limit flexibility in certain setups. The bit depth is at 24-Bit, ensuring high-resolution audio quality for professional use.Show More


In contrast, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) offers a wider range of sample rates, including 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, 176.4, and 192 kHz. This extensive selection allows for more versatility in various recording scenarios. Like the Wave XLR, the Scarlett 2i2 also features a bit depth of 24-Bit, ensuring high fidelity in audio capture.


When it comes to sync sources, the Scarlett 2i2 utilizes internal sync, which can provide a stable and reliable recording experience. The Elgato Wave XLR does not specify any sync sources, which may affect its performance in complex audio setups. Overall, while both interfaces deliver high-quality audio, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers more flexibility in sample rates and sync options, making it a more versatile choice for audio professionals.

Audio Storage & Playback
Compatibility
OS Compatibility
Windows 10 macOS
Windows

The Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface is designed to be compatible with Windows 10 only, which may limit its appeal for users who operate on macOS systems. Additionally, it requires an internet connection for software and driver downloads, which can be a drawback for those who prefer offline setups or have limited internet access.Show More


In contrast, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) offers a broader compatibility spectrum, supporting both macOS and Windows operating systems. Furthermore, it is compatible with mobile apps, specifically iPadOS only, making it a versatile choice for users who want to utilize their audio interface across different devices.


Overall, while the Elgato Wave XLR is tailored for Windows users, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 presents a more flexible option, accommodating both desktop and mobile platforms. This can be a significant factor for users looking for an audio interface that can adapt to various environments and operating systems.

Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)

The Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface operates solely on USB Bus Power, which makes it a straightforward and convenient option for users who prefer a plug-and-play experience without the need for additional power sources. This aspect is particularly appealing for those who want to maintain a clean setup or require portability for on-the-go recording.Show More


In contrast, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) also utilizes USB Bus Power but offers an additional option for power through a USB Power Adapter (not included). This flexibility allows it to be powered independently, which can be beneficial for users who need more power or are using complex setups. The specifications indicate that it requires a 5 VDC at 900 mA input and has a power consumption of 4.5 W, allowing for potentially greater performance in demanding recording situations.


Overall, the choice between the two interfaces may hinge on the user's specific needs regarding power supply. The Elgato Wave XLR is ideal for those seeking simplicity and ease of use, while the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 provides additional power versatility that can cater to more intricate audio setups.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
1.68 lb 1.9 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
7.6 x 6.1 x 3.9" 8.2 x 7 x 2.6"

The Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface has a package weight of 1.68 lb and dimensions of 7.6 x 6.1 x 3.9 inches. This lightweight design makes it a portable option for creators who need an audio interface that is easy to transport. The compact size is suitable for small desk setups or for those who are frequently on the move.Show More


In contrast, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) weighs slightly more at 1.9 lb, with box dimensions of 8.2 x 7 x 2.6 inches. Although it is heavier and slightly larger than the Elgato, it still maintains a relatively compact form factor, making it a viable option for studio and mobile recording setups alike.


Both interfaces offer practical dimensions for users, but the Elgato Wave XLR is designed for users prioritizing portability and desk space. On the other hand, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2, while being slightly bulkier, may provide additional features that cater to different audio needs, appealing to users who may require more connectivity options or professional-grade performance.

Customer Images
Videos