Arturia MiniFuse 4 vs. MOTU M4: Which Audio Interface is Right for You?

Arturia MiniFuse 4 vs. MOTU M4: Which Audio Interface is Right for You?

The MOTU M4 USB-C Audio-MIDI Interface and the Arturia MiniFuse 4 Portable 4x4 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface are two robust options for musicians, producers, and audio engineers looking to enhance their recording setups. Each interface offers distinct features and capabilities, making them suitable for various audio production needs.
The MOTU M4 is renowned for its superb audio quality and ultra-low latency performance. It features ESS Sabre32 Ultra DAC technology, delivering a dynamic range of 120 dB on its main outputs. The M4 provides four inputs and four outputs, including two mic/line/instrument combo inputs with high-quality preamps, and two additional line-level inputs. It also features a full-color LCD screen that provides real-time metering for all inputs and outputs, which is a standout feature for monitoring levels. The M4 supports loopback functionality, making it an excellent choice for live streaming and podcasting.
On the other hand, the Arturia MiniFuse 4 also offers a compact and portable design with a 4x4 configuration, perfect for mobile recording setups. It includes two mic/line/instrument combo inputs and two additional line inputs, with professional-grade preamps to ensure pristine audio capture. The MiniFuse 4 stands out with its comprehensive software bundle, including Arturia’s Analog Lab Intro, Ableton Live Lite, and a selection of effects from Arturia’s FX Collection. This makes it an attractive option for users seeking a complete production package. The interface also features MIDI I/O and loopback functionality, catering to a wide range of recording and streaming needs.
Both interfaces utilize USB Type-C connectivity for fast data transfer and low latency. While the MOTU M4 excels in providing advanced metering and superior DAC performance, the Arturia MiniFuse 4 offers a more extensive software bundle, making it a versatile tool for beginners and seasoned producers alike. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the specific requirements of the user, whether they prioritize hardware features and audio quality or a comprehensive software suite to complement their recording workflow.

In-Depth Comparison of Specifications, Advantages, and Disadvantages

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
  • Purchase Value

    85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Arturia MiniFuse 4 USB Type-C Audio Interface. They found it offered a competitive price point for the features it provided, such as multiple inputs and outputs, high-quality preamps, and robust software bundle. Many users highlighted that it was an excellent choice for both beginners and seasoned audio professionals, offering good value for money due to its versatility and quality.

    15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, citing that there are other interfaces in the market with similar or better specs at a lower price. Some users also mentioned that the initial setup of the software included can be cumbersome, which detracts from the overall perceived value.

    85%
  • Quality of Materials

    80% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They appreciated the solid build quality and the robust design, which gave them confidence in the product's durability. The metal casing was specifically mentioned as a positive aspect, contributing to the overall premium feel of the device.

    20% of users expressed concerns over the quality of materials, with some reporting issues such as loose knobs and fragile connectors. A few users felt that the plastic components used in certain areas could detract from the product's long-term durability.

    80%
  • Sound Quality

    90% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They praised the clarity and fidelity of the audio, noting that the high-quality preamps provided a clean and transparent sound. Users appreciated the low noise floor and the ability to capture detailed recordings, making it suitable for both home studios and professional environments.

    10% of users were not fully satisfied with the sound quality, mentioning occasional interference or static noise issues. Some users felt that the interface's sound quality did not significantly stand out from other competing models in the same price range.

    90%
  • Ease of Use

    75% of users found the Arturia MiniFuse 4 easy to use, highlighting the straightforward interface and intuitive layout. They appreciated the plug-and-play functionality and the user-friendly software that accompanied the device, which streamlined the recording process.

    25% of users experienced challenges with ease of use, citing difficulties in initial setup and configuration. Some users found the accompanying software to be less intuitive, leading to a steeper learning curve, particularly for beginners.

    75%
  • Software Bundle

    70% of users were pleased with the software bundle included with the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They appreciated the range of software tools available, which enhanced their recording and production capabilities. Users noted that the software added significant value to the overall package.

    30% of users were dissatisfied with the software bundle, mentioning compatibility issues and a lack of clear instructions for installation. Some felt that the software could be improved to better meet the needs of advanced users or those with specific technical requirements.

    70%
  • Portability

    85% of users found the Arturia MiniFuse 4 to be highly portable, valuing its compact size and lightweight design. This made it convenient for users who needed to transport their audio interface between different locations, such as for live performances or mobile recording sessions.

    15% of users felt that the portability could be improved, suggesting that while the device is compact, the lack of a dedicated carrying case or protective cover made it less practical for frequent travel.

    85%
  • Compatibility with Devices

    80% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Arturia MiniFuse 4 across various devices and operating systems. They appreciated that it worked seamlessly with both Windows and macOS, as well as with popular DAWs, without the need for extensive configuration.

    20% of users encountered compatibility issues, particularly with older operating systems or less common DAWs. Some users reported driver installation problems or connectivity issues when using certain types of USB ports.

    80%
  • Customer Support

    75% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Arturia. They found the support team to be responsive and helpful in resolving queries related to the MiniFuse 4, whether it was technical issues or general inquiries.

    25% of users were not satisfied with the customer support experience, citing long response times and inadequate solutions to their problems. Some users felt that the level of support did not match the quality of the product.

    75%
  • Durability

    80% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They noted that the sturdy construction and high-quality components contributed to the product's ability to withstand regular use without significant wear and tear.

    20% of users expressed concerns about the long-term durability, with some experiencing issues such as loose connections or faulty components after extended use. These users felt that improvements could be made to enhance the product's longevity.

    80%
  • Latency

    85% of users were impressed with the low latency performance of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They reported seamless real-time monitoring and recording experiences, which were particularly beneficial for musicians and producers working in time-sensitive environments.

    15% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older computer systems or complex DAW setups. Some noted that additional configuration was required to minimize latency, which could be inconvenient.

    85%
  • Design

    90% of users praised the design of the Arturia MiniFuse 4, highlighting its sleek, modern look and intuitive control layout. The aesthetic appeal, combined with functional design elements, made it a favorite among users who value both form and function.

    10% of users were less impressed with the design, suggesting that while it was visually appealing, certain functional aspects such as knob placement could be improved for better usability.

    90%
  • Input/Output Options

    85% of users appreciated the variety of input and output options available on the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They found the multiple XLR, line, and headphone outputs to be versatile and accommodating for various recording and monitoring needs.

    15% of users wished for additional input/output options, particularly more digital outputs or MIDI connections, to better suit their specific setup requirements.

    85%
  • Aesthetics

    90% of users were highly satisfied with the aesthetics of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They found the sleek design and color scheme to be visually appealing, complementing their studio setup and adding a professional touch.

    10% of users felt that the aesthetics could be improved, with a few suggesting that more color options or customizable elements could enhance the appeal for a wider audience.

    90%
  • Build Quality

    80% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They appreciated the sturdy construction and high-quality materials used, which provided confidence in the product's reliability and longevity.

    20% of users expressed concerns about the build quality, with some noting issues such as wobbly knobs or inconsistent finishing that detracted from the overall perception of quality.

    80%
  • Connectivity

    85% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They appreciated the USB Type-C connection, which offered fast and reliable data transfer, and the ability to connect seamlessly to a variety of devices.

    15% of users experienced connectivity issues, particularly with older USB ports or cables. Some users suggested that the inclusion of additional connection types could enhance versatility.

    85%
  • User Interface

    80% of users were satisfied with the user interface of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They found the layout to be intuitive and easy to navigate, allowing for quick adjustments and efficient workflow.

    20% of users found the user interface to be less intuitive, with some suggesting that the labeling and layout could be improved for better clarity and ease of use, particularly for beginners.

    80%
  • Headphone Amplifier Quality

    75% of users were pleased with the headphone amplifier quality, noting that it provided clear and accurate sound reproduction at various volume levels, making it suitable for detailed monitoring.

    25% of users were not satisfied with the headphone amplifier quality, mentioning that it lacked power for high-impedance headphones and could introduce distortion at higher volumes.

    75%
  • Driver Stability

    80% of users reported satisfaction with the driver stability of the Arturia MiniFuse 4, noting that it maintained reliable performance across multiple sessions without crashes or interruptions.

    20% of users encountered driver stability issues, particularly when using specific DAWs or after software updates. Some users mentioned experiencing occasional glitches or the need for frequent driver updates.

    80%
  • Overall Performance

    85% of users were highly satisfied with the overall performance of the Arturia MiniFuse 4. They found it to be a reliable and versatile audio interface that met their recording and production needs effectively.

    15% of users were not fully satisfied with the overall performance, citing specific issues such as occasional software bugs or hardware limitations that affected their workflow.

    85%
  • Value for Professionals

    75% of professional users found value in the Arturia MiniFuse 4, appreciating its robust feature set, which met the demands of professional audio production environments.

    25% of professional users felt that the Arturia MiniFuse 4 fell short of their expectations, particularly in terms of advanced features or expandability options that are crucial for high-end professional use.

    75%
  • Purchase Value

    87% of users found the MOTU M4 USB-C Audio Interface to be a great value for money, highlighting its competitive pricing compared to other interfaces with similar features. Many appreciated the high-quality preamps and low-latency performance, which are often found in more expensive models. Users noted that the interface provided excellent sound quality and a robust build, making it a worthwhile investment for both amateur and professional audio creators.

    13% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, feeling that the interface did not meet their expectations in terms of performance relative to its price. Some users encountered issues with the software or compatibility with certain operating systems, which they felt detracted from the overall value. Additionally, a few users mentioned that other brands offered similar features at a lower cost.

    87%
  • Sound Quality

    92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the MOTU M4. They praised its clear and transparent audio output, which significantly improved their recording and playback experience. Many users appreciated the pristine sound and the high-quality DA converters, which they felt allowed for professional-level recordings without colorization of the input signal.

    8% of users were not satisfied with the sound quality, mainly due to individual preferences or specific issues with their setup. Some reported that the sound output did not meet their expectations for clarity or depth, which may be attributed to mismatched equipment or improper calibration. A few users experienced noise or interference that they believed was related to the interface.

    92%
  • Build Quality

    90% of users praised the MOTU M4 for its solid build quality. They appreciated the sturdy metal chassis, which provided durability and a premium feel. Many users noted that the interface could withstand the rigors of both studio use and on-the-go recording, and liked the high-quality knobs and buttons that enhanced the user experience.

    10% of users were not satisfied with the build quality, citing issues such as loose knobs or buttons that felt flimsy. A few users experienced physical defects, such as poorly fitted parts or cosmetic damage. While these cases were relatively rare, they impacted the overall perception of the interface's durability for those affected.

    90%
  • Ease of Use

    85% of users found the MOTU M4 user-friendly, highlighting its straightforward setup process and intuitive controls. Many appreciated the clear labeling and layout of the interface, which made it easy to navigate without prior technical experience. Users felt that the accompanying software was well-designed and complemented the hardware effectively, adding to the convenience of use.

    15% of users found the MOTU M4 challenging to use, often due to difficulties with the initial setup or software installation. Some users mentioned that the documentation was not detailed enough, requiring them to seek additional help online. Others experienced configuration issues with certain DAWs, which took time to troubleshoot and resolve.

    85%
  • Software Compatibility

    78% of users were satisfied with the software compatibility of the MOTU M4, reporting smooth integration with major digital audio workstations (DAWs) and operating systems. They appreciated the stable drivers and the ease of configuring the interface with their existing audio setups, which facilitated seamless recording and editing sessions.

    22% of users encountered software compatibility issues, particularly with less common DAWs or older operating systems. Some reported driver instability or lag during sessions, which affected their workflow. A number of users also pointed out the lack of dedicated apps or support for mobile devices, limiting the interface's versatility for certain use cases.

    78%
  • Latency Performance

    91% of users were highly satisfied with the latency performance of the MOTU M4, noting its low-latency monitoring capabilities and efficient driver performance. This aspect was particularly praised by musicians and producers who require real-time audio feedback for recording and mixing, as it allowed them to work without noticeable delay.

    9% of users experienced latency issues, which they attributed to their specific computer configurations or the need for additional optimization. Some users found that latency increased when using multiple plugins or high sample rates, which disrupted their workflow and required adjustments to mitigate.

    91%
  • Customer Support

    74% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by MOTU, appreciating the responsive and helpful service they received when encountering issues with the M4. Many users found the support team knowledgeable and capable of resolving their problems efficiently, which increased their overall satisfaction with the product.

    26% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, reporting slow response times and unhelpful resolutions to their inquiries. Some users felt that their issues were not adequately addressed, leading to prolonged downtime and frustration. A few also mentioned that the support resources available online were insufficient for troubleshooting their specific problems.

    74%
  • Portability

    89% of users appreciated the portability of the MOTU M4, noting its compact size and lightweight design. This made it easy to transport and ideal for mobile recording setups or small studio spaces. Users liked that it could easily fit into a backpack or gear bag, making it convenient for musicians and producers on the move.

    11% of users found the portability of the MOTU M4 lacking, primarily due to the need for additional cables or power sources in certain setups. Some users mentioned that while the size was compact, the interface did not feel as rugged as other portable options, causing concern about potential damage during transport.

    89%
  • Input/Output Options

    82% of users were satisfied with the input/output options offered by the MOTU M4, highlighting the versatility provided by the combination of XLR, line, and MIDI inputs. Users enjoyed the ability to connect a range of instruments and devices, which made the interface suitable for various recording scenarios.

    18% of users felt that the input/output options were limited, particularly for more complex audio setups. Some users desired additional inputs or outputs to accommodate larger sessions, while others found the lack of digital I/O options a drawback for integrating with certain studio equipment.

    82%
  • Design

    88% of users appreciated the design of the MOTU M4, praising its sleek, modern look and intuitive control layout. The interface's aesthetic appeal and practical design elements, such as the large volume knob and clear metering displays, were frequently mentioned as positive aspects that enhanced the user experience.

    12% of users were not satisfied with the design, citing minor ergonomic issues such as cramped control spacing or less intuitive button placement. Some users felt that the visual design could be improved for easier navigation during sessions, particularly in low-light environments.

    88%
  • Durability

    86% of users were satisfied with the durability of the MOTU M4, noting its robust construction and resilience to wear and tear. Many users felt confident in its long-term performance, even with regular use in demanding environments. This aspect added to the perceived value and reliability of the interface.

    14% of users expressed concerns about durability, often due to personal experiences with wear-related issues or defective units. Some users reported problems with connectors or components becoming loose over time, which affected their confidence in the interface's longevity.

    86%
  • Aesthetic Appeal

    84% of users were pleased with the aesthetic appeal of the MOTU M4, appreciating its sleek, understated design that blended well with other studio equipment. Users liked the clean lines and professional appearance, which contributed to a positive perception of the product's quality.

    16% of users were less impressed with the aesthetic appeal, feeling that the design was too plain or lacking distinctive features. Some users suggested that more vibrant color options or unique design elements could enhance the interface's visual presence.

    84%
  • Setup Process

    80% of users found the setup process for the MOTU M4 straightforward and hassle-free. They appreciated the clear instructions and minimal steps required to get the interface up and running. The straightforward installation of drivers and software contributed to a smooth start for most users.

    20% of users encountered challenges during the setup process, often related to driver installation or compatibility with their specific operating systems. Some users reported issues with outdated instructions or the need for manual troubleshooting to resolve initial setup problems.

    80%
  • Connectivity

    81% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the MOTU M4, highlighting the versatile USB-C connection that provided stable data transfer. Users appreciated the convenience of a single cable for power and data, which simplified their setup and reduced cable clutter.

    19% of users had issues with connectivity, primarily related to USB-C compatibility with older systems or the need for adapters. Some users experienced intermittent connection problems, which they attributed to cable quality or port compatibility issues.

    81%
  • Driver Stability

    75% of users were pleased with the stability of the drivers provided with the MOTU M4, noting that they facilitated consistent and reliable performance across different applications. Users appreciated the regular updates and support from MOTU to maintain optimal driver functionality.

    25% of users experienced driver stability issues, which impacted their usage of the interface. Some reported crashes or glitches during sessions, requiring frequent updates or reinstallations to resolve. Others found the drivers less stable on certain operating systems, leading to frustration.

    75%
  • User Interface

    83% of users were satisfied with the user interface of the MOTU M4, praising its intuitive design and easy-to-navigate controls. Users found the interface straightforward, with clearly labeled inputs and outputs that simplified the recording process.

    17% of users found the user interface lacking, mainly due to personal preferences or specific workflow needs. Some users desired more customizable options or advanced features that were not available with the current interface design.

    83%
  • Preamp Quality

    89% of users were impressed with the preamp quality of the MOTU M4, noting the clean and transparent sound that enhanced their recordings. Users appreciated the low noise floor and ample headroom provided by the preamps, which allowed for detailed and dynamic audio capture.

    11% of users were not satisfied with the preamp quality, often citing noise issues or insufficient gain for certain microphones. Some users found that the preamps did not perform as well as those in higher-end interfaces, though they acknowledged the trade-off for the price point.

    89%
  • Firmware Updates

    77% of users appreciated the availability of firmware updates for the MOTU M4, which improved functionality and addressed common issues. Users valued the proactive approach taken by MOTU to enhance the interface's performance over time through updates.

    23% of users were dissatisfied with the firmware update process, often due to difficulties in installation or lack of clear instructions. Some users experienced problems after updates, such as changes in settings or new bugs, which required further troubleshooting.

    77%
  • Overall Satisfaction

    88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the MOTU M4, praising its performance, build quality, and value. Users felt that it met or exceeded their expectations in most areas, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking a reliable audio interface.

    12% of users were not fully satisfied with their experience, often due to isolated issues with specific features or compatibility. While most found the product to be satisfactory, these users highlighted areas for improvement to enhance the overall user experience.

    88%
  • Metering Accuracy

    84% of users were satisfied with the metering accuracy of the MOTU M4, noting the clear and precise visual feedback provided during recording and playback. Users appreciated the detailed meters that allowed for effective monitoring of audio levels.

    16% of users encountered issues with metering accuracy, often related to discrepancies between the interface's meters and those in their DAW. Some users found the visual feedback less responsive or precise than expected, impacting their ability to accurately monitor levels.

    84%
  • Output Quality

    90% of users were impressed with the output quality of the MOTU M4, highlighting its clear and detailed sound reproduction. Many users noted the high-quality headphone and line outputs, which provided accurate audio representation for mixing and monitoring.

    10% of users were not satisfied with the output quality, often due to specific issues with their setup or preferences. Some users experienced faint noise or distortion, which they attributed to external factors or mismatched equipment rather than the interface itself.

    90%
Show More
Pros:
  • Compact and portable design makes it easy to carry.
  • High-quality audio performance with 24-bit/192kHz resolution.
  • USB Type-C connectivity ensures fast and reliable data transfer.
  • Multiple inputs and outputs (4x4) provide flexibility for various recording setups.
  • Includes MIDI I/O for integrating external MIDI gear.
  • Comes with a suite of bundled software for music production.
  • High-quality audio performance with ESS Sabre32 Ultra DAC technology.
  • Ultra-low latency performance, making it suitable for real-time monitoring.
  • Comprehensive metering with full-color LCD display for precise level monitoring.
  • USB-C connectivity ensures fast data transfer and compatibility with modern devices.
  • Sturdy build quality and compact design, ideal for portable use.
  • Loopback functionality for easy live streaming and podcasting.
Cons:
  • Limited physical controls may not suit all users.
  • No onboard DSP effects for real-time monitoring.
  • Requires computer connection for power.
  • May not be sufficient for larger, more complex recording setups.
  • Limited to 4 inputs and 4 outputs, which may not be sufficient for larger setups.
  • No built-in DSP effects, which could limit flexibility for some users.
  • Only USB bus-powered, which might not be ideal for all scenarios.
  • No ADAT or S/PDIF connectivity, limiting expansion options.
Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog:
4 Input / 4 Output
Digital:
Digital I/O
Analog:
4 Inputs / 4 Outputs
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit 192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 2 Preamps
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel)
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line Input
4x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line/Monitor Output
2x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Input
1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output
4x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output (DC-Coupled)
4x RCA TS Unbalanced Line Output
Host Connection
1x USB-C 1x USB-C
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.13 or Later (64-Bit Only)
Windows 8.1 or Later (64-Bit Only)
macOS 10.11 or Later
Windows 7 or Later
9 or Later
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power USB Bus Power
When comparing the MOTU M4 USB-C Audio-MIDI Interface and the Arturia MiniFuse 4 Portable 4x4 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface, several key features stand out, making each device suitable for different needs and preferences.
Starting with the channels of analog input and output, both interfaces offer 4 inputs and 4 outputs. The MOTU M4 provides 2 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced mic/line/Hi-Z inputs, 2 additional 1/4" TRS balanced line inputs, 4x 1/4" TRS balanced line outputs (DC-coupled), and 4x RCA TS unbalanced line outputs. On the other hand, the Arturia MiniFuse 4 also offers 2 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced mic/line/Hi-Z inputs on the front panel, 2 additional 1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced line inputs, and 4x 1/4" TRS balanced line/monitor outputs, but it differentiates itself by including 2x 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone outputs on the front panel.
Both units are capable of achieving a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit resolution, ensuring high-quality audio recording and playback. They each feature 2 microphone inputs with preamps, suitable for professional recording applications.
When it comes to host connection, both interfaces use USB-C, ensuring high-speed data transfer and compatibility with modern devices. However, their OS compatibility differs slightly. The MOTU M4 supports macOS 10.11 or later and Windows 7 or later, offering a broader range of compatibility. In contrast, the Arturia MiniFuse 4 is compatible with macOS 10.13 or later (64-bit only) and Windows 8.1 or later (64-bit only), which may limit its use with older operating systems.
Power requirements for both interfaces are met via USB bus power, meaning they do not require an additional power source and can be powered directly through the USB connection, which is convenient for portable setups.
In summary, while both the MOTU M4 and Arturia MiniFuse 4 offer similar core functionalities with high sampling rates and multiple I/O options, they differ in their specific configurations and OS compatibility. The MOTU M4 provides additional unbalanced line outputs (RCA) and broader OS compatibility, whereas the Arturia MiniFuse 4 features dual headphone outputs and slightly more recent OS requirements. Choosing between them will depend on specific needs such as the type of outputs required and the operating systems in use.
General
Channels of I/O
Analog:
4 Input / 4 Output
Digital:
Digital I/O
Analog:
4 Inputs / 4 Outputs
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit 192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 2 Preamps
Input Level Adjustment
2x Knob 2x Knob
Expansion Slots
When comparing the MOTU M4 USB-C Audio-MIDI Interface and the Arturia MiniFuse 4 Portable 4x4 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface, several key features stand out for both devices.
Both interfaces offer 4 analog input and 4 analog output channels, providing ample connectivity for a range of recording and playback needs. Each device supports a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit resolution, ensuring high-quality audio capture and playback.
The MOTU M4 includes 2 microphone preamps, each with its own input level adjustment knob, allowing for precise control over the input signal. Similarly, the Arturia MiniFuse 4 also features 2 microphone inputs with individual level adjustment knobs, offering comparable ease of use for managing input levels.
In terms of additional features, both interfaces lack built-in DSP and expansion slots, indicating a focus on core audio and MIDI functionality without additional processing or expansion capabilities. Neither interface includes a built-in microphone, keeping the design focused on external mic usage.
Overall, both the MOTU M4 and the Arturia MiniFuse 4 present similar specifications in terms of I/O channels, sampling rate, microphone inputs, and input level adjustment, making them both solid choices for users seeking a reliable and high-quality audio interface.
Signal Processing
Pad
Gain/Trim Range
Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs:
56 dB
Mic Inputs:
0 dB to +60 dB
Line/Hi-Z Inputs:
0 dB to +57 dB
High-Pass Filter
Solo/Mute
When comparing the MOTU M4 USB-C Audio-MIDI Interface and the Arturia MiniFuse 4 Portable 4x4 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface, several notable differences and similarities can be observed based on the specified features.
Both interfaces do not include a pad option, which is a feature often used to reduce the input level of a signal to prevent distortion. This means that users will have to rely on other methods to manage high input levels with both the MOTU M4 and the Arturia MiniFuse 4.
In terms of gain/trim range, the MOTU M4 offers a broader range for its mic inputs, adjustable from 0 dB to +60 dB, and for its line/Hi-Z inputs, adjustable from 0 dB to +57 dB. In contrast, the Arturia MiniFuse 4 provides a gain/trim range of 56 dB for its mic/line/Hi-Z inputs, which is slightly narrower compared to the MOTU M4. This difference in range might be significant for users who require more precise control over input levels, especially in varied recording scenarios.
Neither the MOTU M4 nor the Arturia MiniFuse 4 includes a high-pass filter. High-pass filters are typically used to eliminate low-frequency noise and rumble, so the absence of this feature means users will need to manage low-frequency content through their DAWs or external hardware.
Lastly, both interfaces lack solo/mute functionality, which is a feature used to isolate or mute specific channels during monitoring or recording. Users who rely on solo/mute options will need to utilize their DAWs or external mixing consoles to achieve similar control.
In summary, while both the MOTU M4 and Arturia MiniFuse 4 share similar limitations in terms of pad, high-pass filter, and solo/mute features, the key difference lies in the gain/trim range, where the MOTU M4 offers a slightly wider adjustment capability. This could make the MOTU M4 a more versatile option for users needing more extensive gain control.
Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel)
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line Input
4x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line/Monitor Output
2x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Input
1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output
4x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output (DC-Coupled)
4x RCA TS Unbalanced Line Output
Phantom Power
48 V, Selectable On/Off (Applied to All Inputs) 48 V, Selectable On/Off (Selectable on Individual Inputs)
Digital Audio I/O
Host Connection
1x USB-C 1x USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0 USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)
2x USB-A (USB 2.0, Device Connection)
Sync I/O
Network I/O
MIDI I/O
1x DIN 5-Pin Input
1x DIN 5-Pin Output
1x DIN 5-Pin Input
1x DIN 5-Pin Output
The MOTU M4 and Arturia MiniFuse 4 are both versatile USB-C audio/MIDI interfaces designed for high-quality audio recording and playback, but they offer different features that may cater to varying needs.
In terms of analog audio I/O, both interfaces come equipped with two combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced mic/line/Hi-Z inputs, ensuring flexibility for different types of audio sources. The MOTU M4 includes two additional 1/4" TRS balanced line inputs and a single 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output. On the other hand, the Arturia MiniFuse 4 provides two 1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced line inputs and two 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone outputs, offering more headphone monitoring options.
For analog outputs, the MOTU M4 features four 1/4" TRS balanced line outputs (DC-coupled) and four RCA TS unbalanced line outputs, providing a broader range of connectivity options. The Arturia MiniFuse 4 includes four 1/4" TRS balanced line/monitor outputs, which ensures high-quality balanced connections but lacks the unbalanced RCA outputs found on the MOTU M4.
Both interfaces offer 48V phantom power for condenser microphones, but there is a distinction in how this is applied. The MOTU M4 allows for selectable phantom power on individual inputs, giving greater control over each input channel. The Arturia MiniFuse 4 applies phantom power to all inputs simultaneously, which might be less flexible in certain recording scenarios.
Neither interface offers digital audio I/O, sync I/O, or network I/O capabilities, keeping the focus on analog and USB connections. The host connection for both devices is a single USB-C port, adhering to the USB 2.0 protocol for reliable data transfer.
When it comes to additional USB connections, the MOTU M4 does not provide any, whereas the Arturia MiniFuse 4 includes two USB-A (USB 2.0) ports for device connections, adding extra versatility for connecting other USB peripherals.
For MIDI I/O, both interfaces are equipped with one DIN 5-pin input and one DIN 5-pin output, ensuring compatibility with various MIDI devices. Neither device includes wireless capabilities, maintaining a straightforward wired connection approach.
In summary, while both the MOTU M4 and Arturia MiniFuse 4 offer robust audio and MIDI interfacing capabilities, the choice between them may depend on specific needs such as output options, headphone connectivity, phantom power flexibility, and additional USB device connections.
Performance
Frequency Response
Mic Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB (Min Gain)
Hi-Z Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB (Min Gain)
Line Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.05 dB (Min Gain)
Line Outputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.09 dB
Headphone Outputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.09 dB
Mic Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz +0/-0.1 dB
Line, Hi-Z Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.15 dB
Line Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.07 dB
Line Outputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz +0/-0.1 dB
Maximum Input Level
Mic Inputs:
+9 dBu
Hi-Z Inputs:
+11.5 dBu
Line Inputs:
+22 dBu
Mic Inputs:
+10 dBu (Min Gain)
Line/Hi-Z Inputs:
+16 dBu (Min Gain)
Line Inputs:
+18 dBu (Min Gain)
Maximum Output Level
Line Outputs:
+12 dBu
Headphone Outputs:
+11.4 dBu
Line Outputs:
+16 dBu (Balanced)
Line Outputs:
+9.5 dBu (Unbalanced)
Headphone Outputs:
+12.5 dBu
Impedance
Mic Inputs:
2.5 Kilohms
Hi-Z Inputs:
1 Megohm
Line Inputs:
16 Kilohms
Line Outputs:
94 Ohms
Headphone Outputs:
10 Ohms
Mic Inputs:
2.65 Kilohms
Line Inputs:
2 Megohms
Hi-Z Inputs:
1 Megohm
Line Outputs:
100 Ohms
Dynamic Range
Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs:
110 dB (A-Weighted)
Line Outputs:
107.5 dB (A-Weighted)
Headphone Outputs:
104 dB (A-Weighted)
Mic Inputs:
115 dBA
Line/Hi-Z Inputs:
114 dBA
Line Inputs:
115 dBA
Line/Monitor Outputs:
120 dBA
RCA Outputs:
119 dBA
Headphone Outputs:
115 dBA
THD+N
Mic Inputs:
-100 dB (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Typical)
Hi-Z Inputs:
-91 dB (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Typical)
Line Inputs:
-100 dB (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Typical)
Line Outputs:
-101 dB (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Typical)
Mic Inputs:
< -97 dB / < 0.0014%
Line/Hi-Z Inputs:
< -100 dB / < 0.001%
Line Inputs:
< -106 dB / < 0.0005%
Line/Monitor Outputs:
< -110 dB / < 0.00032%
RCA Outputs:
< -105 dB / < 0.00056%
Headphone Outputs:
< -110 dB / < 0.0003%
EIN
Mic Inputs:
-129 dB A-Weighted
Mic Inputs:
-129 dB A-Weighted (150-Ohm Source, Max Gain)
When comparing the MOTU M4 USB-C Audio-MIDI Interface with the Arturia MiniFuse 4 Portable 4x4 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface, several key features stand out, which can help users decide which device better suits their needs.
In terms of frequency response, the MOTU M4 offers a very flat response across its various input and output types, with a range of 20 Hz to 20 kHz and minimal deviation. Specifically, the mic inputs have a response of +0/-0.1 dB, while the line outputs also maintain a +0/-0.1 dB variance. The Arturia MiniFuse 4 also provides a flat frequency response across the same range, but with a slightly higher variance, such as ±0.06 dB for mic and Hi-Z inputs and ±0.09 dB for headphone outputs.
When it comes to maximum input levels, the Arturia MiniFuse 4 stands out with its line inputs supporting up to +22 dBu, which is higher compared to the MOTU M4's +18 dBu for line inputs. For mic inputs, the MOTU M4 can handle +10 dBu, while the MiniFuse 4 supports up to +9 dBu. For Hi-Z inputs, the M4 tops at +16 dBu, whereas the MiniFuse 4 can handle +11.5 dBu.
The maximum output level of the MOTU M4 is higher for balanced line outputs at +16 dBu, compared to the MiniFuse 4's +12 dBu. The M4's headphone outputs can deliver up to +12.5 dBu, which is slightly higher than the MiniFuse 4’s +11.4 dBu. Additionally, the MiniFuse 4's headphone output power is 137 mW into 33 Ohms, a specification not provided by the M4.
Regarding impedance, the MOTU M4 has mic inputs with an impedance of 2.65 Kilohms, line inputs at 2 Megohms, and Hi-Z inputs at 1 Megohm. The Arturia MiniFuse 4 shows similar values with mic inputs at 2.5 Kilohms and Hi-Z inputs at 1 Megohm, but it differs significantly for line inputs with 16 Kilohms, and its headphone outputs are at 10 Ohms compared to the M4’s unspecified value.
In terms of dynamic range, the MOTU M4 outperforms the MiniFuse 4 across most categories. For instance, the M4's line/monitor outputs offer a dynamic range of 120 dBA, while the MiniFuse 4's line outputs provide 107.5 dB (A-Weighted). The M4 also offers a higher dynamic range for headphone outputs at 115 dBA compared to the MiniFuse 4’s 104 dB (A-Weighted).
THD+N (Total Harmonic Distortion plus Noise) values also indicate a performance edge for the MOTU M4. The M4's mic inputs have a THD+N of < -97 dB / < 0.0014%, whereas the MiniFuse 4's mic inputs are rated at -100 dB (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Typical). The M4’s line/monitor outputs achieve < -110 dB / < 0.00032%, compared to the MiniFuse 4’s -101 dB (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Typical) for line outputs.
Both interfaces feature an Equivalent Input Noise (EIN) for mic inputs at -129 dB A-Weighted, ensuring low noise performance.
In summary, while both the MOTU M4 and Arturia MiniFuse 4 provide excellent audio interfaces with flat frequency responses and robust specifications, the MOTU M4 generally offers superior performance in terms of higher dynamic range, lower THD+N values, and higher maximum output levels, making it a more powerful choice for professional audio applications. The Arturia MiniFuse 4, on the other hand, provides higher maximum input levels for line inputs and a very competitive overall performance for a portable and versatile option.
Digital Audio
Sample Rates
44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 / 176.4 / 192 kHz Up to 192 kHz
Sample Rate Conversion
Bit Depths
24-Bit 24-Bit
Sync Sources
Internal Internal
The MOTU M4 USB-C Audio-MIDI Interface and the Arturia MiniFuse 4 Portable 4x4 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface both offer high-quality audio performance, but they have some differences in their specifications.
Both interfaces support sample rates up to 192 kHz and offer 24-bit depth, ensuring high-resolution audio recording and playback. Neither device features sample rate conversion, meaning they both rely on the internal sample rates set by the user.
The MOTU M4 has a notable feature in zero-latency direct monitoring, which reduces latency to an imperceptible level, allowing for real-time audio monitoring without delay. It also mentions achieving a latency of 2.5 ms at 96 kHz, which is dependent on the buffer size and input-to-output settings. This could be particularly advantageous for musicians and producers who require immediate feedback during recording sessions.
In comparison, while the Arturia MiniFuse 4 also features internal sync sources, it does not explicitly state its latency performance or if it includes zero-latency direct monitoring. This might suggest that while it supports high sample rates and bit depths, potential users might need to delve deeper into user reviews or additional documentation to fully understand its real-time monitoring capabilities.
In summary, both interfaces promise high-resolution audio with up to 192 kHz sample rates and 24-bit depth. The MOTU M4's clear emphasis on zero-latency direct monitoring and specific latency figures at different sample rates could provide a significant advantage for users requiring precise and immediate audio feedback. The Arturia MiniFuse 4, while similarly equipped in terms of fundamental audio specifications, does not provide as much detailed information regarding latency and monitoring capabilities.
Audio Storage & Playback
Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.13 or Later (64-Bit Only)
Windows 8.1 or Later (64-Bit Only)
macOS 10.11 or Later
Windows 7 or Later
9 or Later
Processor Requirement
Intel Core i5 or Better (64-Bit)
AMD Core i5 or Better (64-Bit)
Mac:
1 GHz Intel
PC:
1 GHz Intel Pentium
RAM Requirements
4 GB, 8 GB Recommended (64-Bit) 2 GB, 4 GB Recommended
Required Hardware
Available USB 2.0 Port
USB Cable (Included)
Available USB 2.0 Port
USB Cable (Included)
The MOTU M4 USB-C Audio-MIDI Interface and the Arturia MiniFuse 4 Portable 4x4 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface are both robust solutions for audio and MIDI interfacing, but they have distinct specifications that cater to different user requirements.
The MOTU M4 is compatible with macOS 10.11 or later and Windows 7 or later, making it versatile for users with older systems. It requires a minimum of a 1 GHz Intel processor on both Mac and PC platforms, with 2 GB of RAM as a baseline, although 4 GB is recommended for optimal performance. The interface also necessitates an available USB 2.0 port and includes a USB cable for connectivity. An internet connection is required for downloading necessary software and drivers.
On the other hand, the Arturia MiniFuse 4 is compatible with macOS 10.13 or later and Windows 8.1 or later, but only operates on 64-bit systems. This interface demands a more powerful Intel Core i5 or AMD Core i5 processor or better, reflecting its need for more recent computing power. The RAM requirement starts at 4 GB, with 8 GB recommended, emphasizing its design for more intensive tasks. Similar to the MOTU M4, it also requires an available USB 2.0 port and comes with a USB cable.
In summary, the MOTU M4 offers broader OS compatibility and lower system requirements, making it suitable for users with older or less powerful computers. The Arturia MiniFuse 4, with its higher system requirements and 64-bit-only operation, is geared towards users with more recent and powerful hardware, ensuring enhanced performance for more demanding audio tasks. Both interfaces include the necessary USB cable and require an internet connection for software and driver installation.
Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power USB Bus Power
When comparing the MOTU M4 USB-C Audio-MIDI Interface and the Arturia MiniFuse 4 Portable 4x4 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface, both devices have a common feature in terms of power requirements, as both interfaces are powered via USB bus power. This means that neither device requires an additional power supply, making them highly portable and convenient for users who need to record or produce music on the go. This feature simplifies setup and reduces the number of cables needed, contributing to a cleaner and more efficient workspace.
The MOTU M4 is a highly regarded interface known for its exceptional audio quality and low latency performance. It features ESS Sabre32 Ultra DAC technology, which provides high dynamic range and low distortion, ensuring clear and detailed audio playback. The M4 offers 4-in/4-out audio channels, including two mic/line/guitar inputs with individual preamps and phantom power, as well as two additional balanced line inputs. It also includes loopback functionality for live streaming and podcasting, along with a full-color LCD screen that provides detailed metering for all inputs and outputs.
On the other hand, the Arturia MiniFuse 4 also offers a 4-in/4-out configuration but places a strong emphasis on its compact and portable design. It includes four mic/line/instrument inputs with high-quality preamps and 48V phantom power, as well as four balanced line outputs. The MiniFuse 4 also features a USB hub, allowing users to connect additional USB devices directly to the interface, which can be particularly useful for users with limited USB ports on their computers. Arturia includes a suite of software with the MiniFuse 4, providing users with a comprehensive package for music production, including DAWs and virtual instruments.
In summary, both the MOTU M4 and the Arturia MiniFuse 4 are powered via USB bus power, ensuring ease of use and portability. The MOTU M4 excels in audio quality and detailed metering, while the Arturia MiniFuse 4 offers additional USB connectivity and a robust software bundle, catering to different user preferences and workflows.
Packaging Info
Package Weight
2.015 lb 2.15 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
11.1 x 7.4 x 2" 10.6 x 7.3 x 2.8"
When comparing the MOTU M4 USB-C Audio-MIDI Interface and the Arturia MiniFuse 4 Portable 4x4 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface, several distinct differences and similarities in their physical specifications are noteworthy.
The MOTU M4 has a package weight of 2.15 pounds and comes in a box with dimensions of 10.6 x 7.3 x 2.8 inches. In comparison, the Arturia MiniFuse 4 is slightly lighter with a package weight of 2.015 pounds and is packaged in a slightly larger box measuring 11.1 x 7.4 x 2 inches.
Both interfaces are designed to be portable and user-friendly, with the MOTU M4 being marginally heavier and more compact in its packaging, while the Arturia MiniFuse 4, though lighter, comes in a slightly larger box. These differences in weight and dimensions may influence user preferences based on portability and storage needs.
Customer Images