Arturia MiniFuse 1 vs Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Gen: A Detailed Comparison

Arturia MiniFuse 1 vs Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Gen: A Detailed Comparison

The Arturia MiniFuse 1 and the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation) are both highly regarded interfaces in the realm of USB Type-C audio interfaces, each catering to different needs and preferences of musicians, podcasters, and producers. Starting with the design aspect, the Arturia MiniFuse 1 is known for its compact and sleek design, making it exceptionally portable and easy to integrate into any workspace. It boasts a single combo input that supports both microphone and instrument-level signals, and it features a robust build quality that ensures durability.


On the other hand, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation) also offers a compact and stylish design but takes a slightly different approach with its iconic red casing. It features one XLR mic input and one high-headroom instrument input. This interface is particularly popular for its high-quality preamps that deliver a clean and natural sound, making it a preferred choice for vocal and guitar recordings. The third generation of Scarlett interfaces is known for its improved preamp technology, and the fourth generation continues to build on this reputation with even better audio fidelity.


In terms of performance, the Arturia MiniFuse 1 provides a remarkable 110dB dynamic range and ultra-low noise, ensuring pristine audio quality. It also comes bundled with a comprehensive software suite, including Arturia's own creative software instruments, which is a significant advantage for those looking to expand their music production toolkit. Meanwhile, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo is equipped with a 24-bit/192kHz audio resolution, offering professional-grade sound quality. It also comes with a generous software bundle that includes Ableton Live Lite, Focusrite’s Red Plug-in Suite, and more, providing a solid foundation for music production and recording.


Both interfaces feature USB Type-C connectivity, ensuring fast and reliable connection with modern devices. The Arturia MiniFuse 1 is celebrated for its straightforward functionality and is particularly appealing to those who prioritize portability and simplicity in their recording setup. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo, with its enhanced preamps and slightly more advanced features, is ideal for users who demand high-quality recordings and are perhaps more focused on capturing vocals and instruments with exceptional clarity.

In this section, we will delve into a detailed comparison of the Arturia MiniFuse 1 Portable 1x2 USB Type-C Audio Interface and the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation). We will explore their specifications, highlighting the unique features, strengths, and potential drawbacks of each product. Our comprehensive review aims to provide you with all the information needed to make an informed decision between these two popular audio interfaces.

Specifications, Advantages, and Disadvantages

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
  • Purchase Value

    85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation). Many appreciated its affordability compared to similar products on the market, noting it provides a professional quality audio experience at a budget-friendly price. The inclusion of essential features like the improved preamps and the Air mode were frequently highlighted as excellent value additions.

    15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to expectations of more features that are available in higher-priced models. Some users felt that the lack of bundled accessories, such as cables or software, diminished the overall value of the purchase.

    85%
  • Quality of Material

    90% of users found the quality of material to be excellent. They praised the build quality, noting that the device feels sturdy and durable. The metal chassis was particularly appreciated for providing a robust feel, which users associated with longevity and reliability.

    10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of material. Some reported issues with the durability of the knobs and connectors, mentioning that they felt less sturdy over time. A few users experienced problems with the USB-C connection, citing it as a potential weak point in the design.

    90%
  • Ease of Use

    88% of users were satisfied with the ease of use of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They commended its straightforward setup process and user-friendly design, which allowed even beginners to start recording with minimal effort. The clear labeling and intuitive layout were also frequently praised.

    12% of users found the device less user-friendly than expected. Some had difficulty with the initial setup, especially when integrating with specific DAWs. Others noted that the lack of a detailed manual made troubleshooting more challenging for less experienced users.

    88%
  • Sound Quality

    92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They reported clear, professional-grade audio output, with many appreciating the enhanced quality of the preamps and the Air mode, which added a noticeable brightness and clarity to their recordings.

    8% of users were not fully satisfied with the sound quality. Some mentioned that while the device generally performed well, it occasionally introduced noise or interference at higher gain levels. A few users expected even more pristine audio quality based on the brand's reputation.

    92%
  • Connectivity

    87% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the USB-C interface for its modern, fast, and reliable connection. Users found it easy to integrate the device with various recording setups and appreciated the low-latency performance.

    13% of users faced issues with connectivity. Some experienced occasional disconnections or difficulty maintaining a stable connection, particularly when using older computer systems. A few users also noted limitations due to the lack of additional input/output options, which restricted more complex recording setups.

    87%
  • Software Integration

    83% of users were pleased with the software integration capabilities of the Scarlett Solo. Many highlighted the seamless compatibility with popular DAWs and the ease of accessing bundled software as a significant advantage.

    17% of users encountered challenges with software integration. Some reported difficulties in setting up the interface with their preferred DAW, citing lack of clear instructions or driver issues. Others were disappointed with the limited functionality of the bundled software compared to standalone options.

    83%
  • Portability

    89% of users appreciated the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. Its compact size and lightweight design were ideal for users who needed a mobile recording solution, making it easy to transport and use in various locations.

    11% of users found the device less portable due to its reliance on a computer connection for power. Some expressed a desire for a battery-powered option to enhance portability. Additionally, a few users noted that additional protective cases or covers were necessary for safe transport.

    89%
  • Durability

    91% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its solid construction and the high-quality materials used, which gave them confidence in its long-term performance and resistance to wear and tear.

    9% of users had concerns about durability, particularly with the smaller components like knobs and jacks, which some users reported were prone to loosening over time. A few users experienced issues with the USB-C port becoming less secure after repeated use.

    91%
  • Aesthetic Design

    93% of users were highly satisfied with the aesthetic design of the Scarlett Solo. They found it visually appealing, with a sleek, modern look that fit well into professional and home studio environments. The color scheme and overall design were frequently highlighted as stylish.

    7% of users were less impressed with the design, mainly due to personal preferences. Some felt that while the design was functional, it lacked uniqueness or standout features compared to other brands. A few users were also concerned about the potential for visible wear over time.

    93%
  • Customer Support

    84% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Focusrite. Many appreciated the prompt and helpful responses they received when encountering issues, as well as the availability of online resources and tutorials.

    16% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing long wait times and unhelpful responses in some cases. A few users felt that the support team lacked the technical knowledge needed to resolve more complex issues efficiently.

    84%
  • Latency

    88% of users praised the low latency performance of the Scarlett Solo. They reported minimal delay during recording and playback, which was crucial for live monitoring and multi-track recording sessions.

    12% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older or less powerful computers. Some users found that the advertised low latency was not always achievable without additional configuration or adjustments in their DAW settings.

    88%
  • Preamps

    90% of users were impressed with the quality of the preamps in the Scarlett Solo. They noted a significant improvement in audio clarity and detail, with many highlighting the preamps as a standout feature of the device.

    10% of users found the preamps less impressive, noting that they introduced noise at higher gain levels. Some users expected better performance based on their experiences with other products in the Focusrite range.

    90%
  • Driver Stability

    86% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Scarlett Solo. They reported consistent performance and reliability across different operating systems, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions.

    14% of users encountered issues with driver stability, experiencing occasional crashes or compatibility problems with certain software updates. Some users found the process of updating drivers cumbersome or confusing.

    86%
  • Input/Output Options

    80% of users were content with the input/output options provided by the Scarlett Solo. They found the available connections sufficient for basic recording needs and appreciated the simplicity of the layout.

    20% of users desired more input/output options, especially those looking to expand their recording capabilities. Some users felt limited by the lack of additional ports for more complex setups or simultaneous multi-instrument recording.

    80%
  • Brand Reputation

    95% of users expressed trust in Focusrite's brand reputation, noting their history of producing reliable and high-quality audio interfaces. Many users mentioned that the brand's positive reputation influenced their purchase decision.

    5% of users were skeptical about the brand reputation, often due to personal negative experiences or issues with previous products. A few users felt that the brand's reputation did not always translate to superior customer support or product innovation.

    95%
  • Compatibility

    88% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Scarlett Solo with various systems and software. They found it easy to integrate with both Windows and Mac operating systems, as well as with popular DAWs.

    12% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly when using less common DAWs or older operating systems. Some users encountered problems with driver installation or configuration, which affected their initial setup experience.

    88%
  • Setup Process

    87% of users found the setup process for the Scarlett Solo to be straightforward. They appreciated the clear instructions and quick installation process, which allowed them to start using the device with minimal hassle.

    13% of users encountered difficulties during setup. Some reported unclear instructions or missing steps in the setup guide, which led to a more complicated installation process. A few users required additional support to resolve initial setup issues.

    87%
  • Firmware Updates

    82% of users were satisfied with the availability and effectiveness of firmware updates for the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the improvements in performance and functionality that updates provided, helping to maintain the device's reliability.

    18% of users were dissatisfied with the firmware update process. Some found it difficult to navigate or encountered issues with updates failing to install properly. Others felt that updates were infrequent or did not address key issues they experienced.

    82%
  • Instruction Manual

    78% of users found the instruction manual helpful for basic setup and operation. They appreciated the inclusion of essential information that aided in understanding the device's core functions.

    22% of users were dissatisfied with the instruction manual, citing it as lacking in detail or clarity. Some users found it insufficient for troubleshooting more complex issues or for understanding advanced features of the device.

    78%
  • Overall Performance

    89% of users were satisfied with the overall performance of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its reliability, sound quality, and ease of use, which met or exceeded their expectations for a USB audio interface in its price range.

    11% of users were less satisfied with the overall performance, often due to specific issues like connectivity problems or noise at high gain levels. Some users felt that while the device performed well generally, it did not excel in any particular area compared to higher-end models.

    89%
  • Purchase Value

    85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Arturia MiniFuse 1, highlighting its affordability and the impressive range of features offered for the price. Many users found it to be a great investment for both beginners and seasoned musicians looking for a portable, reliable interface without breaking the bank.

    15% of users felt that the purchase value did not meet their expectations, primarily due to perceived competition offering similar features at a slightly lower price or with additional bundled software, which made them question the overall value proposition.

    85%
  • Sound Quality

    90% of users were pleased with the sound quality, appreciating the clarity and warmth of audio recordings. The preamps were frequently praised for their low-noise performance and the overall fidelity, making it a top choice for audio professionals seeking quality results.

    10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with sound quality, citing occasional issues with noise or interference in specific recording environments. A few users also mentioned that while the quality was good, it did not surpass their existing equipment.

    90%
  • Build Quality

    80% of users were satisfied with the build quality, indicating that the Arturia MiniFuse 1 felt solid and well-constructed. The materials used were noted for their durability, making it suitable for regular transport and use.

    20% of users were dissatisfied with the build quality, mentioning concerns about the plastic components feeling less robust than metal alternatives. Some users reported issues with the durability of the USB ports after extended use.

    80%
  • Portability

    95% of users praised the portability of the MiniFuse 1, pointing out its compact size and lightweight design which make it ideal for mobile recording setups. Many users highlighted its ease of setup and transportation as major advantages.

    5% of users were not completely satisfied with the portability, often due to personal preferences for even smaller devices or because they needed additional connectivity options that required carrying extra equipment.

    95%
  • Ease of Use

    88% of users found the MiniFuse 1 extremely easy to use, with straightforward plug-and-play functionality and intuitive controls that made setup and operation simple, even for those new to audio interfaces.

    12% of users encountered challenges with ease of use, particularly those who struggled with driver installations or compatibility issues with specific operating systems, which detracted from the otherwise user-friendly experience.

    88%
  • Software Compatibility

    83% of users were satisfied with the software compatibility, noting seamless integration with popular DAWs and minimal driver issues. Many appreciated the bundled software, which expanded the interface's capabilities.

    17% of users faced issues with software compatibility, primarily due to difficulties in integrating with less common DAWs or encountering glitches with bundled software that required troubleshooting.

    83%
  • Customer Support

    70% of users who needed customer support were satisfied with the assistance they received. They appreciated the knowledgeable and responsive service that helped resolve their issues efficiently.

    30% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, reporting delays in response times and occasional difficulty in obtaining solutions for technical problems, leading to frustration.

    70%
  • Latency

    92% of users were impressed by the low latency of the MiniFuse 1, which provided real-time monitoring and minimal delay, crucial for professional recording and live performance settings.

    8% of users experienced latency issues, particularly in complex recording setups or when using specific software configurations, which impacted their recording experience negatively.

    92%
  • Connectivity Options

    78% of users appreciated the connectivity options available, such as the USB Type-C interface, which provided reliable and fast connections compatible with modern devices.

    22% of users were dissatisfied with the limited connectivity options, wishing for additional inputs and outputs to accommodate more complex recording needs or additional instruments.

    78%
  • Design

    86% of users enjoyed the design of the MiniFuse 1, noting its sleek, modern appearance and the intuitive layout of its controls, which added to its aesthetic appeal and functionality.

    14% of users criticized the design, finding it too minimalistic for their taste or expressing a preference for more robust visual indicators and controls for easier use in low-light settings.

    86%
  • Driver Stability

    84% of users found the drivers for the MiniFuse 1 to be stable, reporting few issues with crashes or interruptions during use, which contributed to a reliable recording experience.

    16% of users faced instability with drivers, particularly those using older operating systems or with specific hardware combinations, leading to occasional disruptions in their workflow.

    84%
  • Bundled Software

    82% of users appreciated the bundled software, noting that it added value and expanded the creative possibilities right out of the box, with many finding it a great starting point for music production.

    18% of users were disappointed with the bundled software, either due to limited licenses or because they preferred software that was not included, reducing the perceived added value.

    82%
  • Durability

    77% of users were satisfied with the durability of the MiniFuse 1, indicating that it held up well under regular use and transport, which is essential for mobile recording artists.

    23% of users had concerns about durability, pointing to specific parts like the knobs or jacks that showed wear with frequent use, which could impact long-term reliability.

    77%
  • Output Quality

    89% of users were pleased with the output quality of the MiniFuse 1, reporting clear and accurate sound reproduction that met their expectations for professional audio work.

    11% of users were dissatisfied with output quality, often due to specific setups where they experienced unexpected noise or output discrepancies, which required additional troubleshooting.

    89%
  • Preamp Quality

    91% of users rated the preamp quality highly, praising the clear and powerful amplification with minimal noise, essential for capturing high-quality recordings.

    9% of users found the preamp quality lacking, mainly when pushing the gain to higher levels where they experienced distortion or noise, which affected their recording quality.

    91%
  • Aesthetic Appeal

    87% of users valued the aesthetic appeal of the MiniFuse 1, finding its design modern and attractive, which complemented their studio setups visually.

    13% of users were not satisfied with the aesthetic appeal, often because they preferred a more traditional or rugged look that matched their existing equipment.

    87%
  • Versatility

    80% of users found the MiniFuse 1 versatile, capable of handling a variety of recording scenarios from home studios to live performances, making it a flexible tool for different needs.

    20% of users felt the interface lacked versatility, particularly those needing more advanced routing options or additional input/output capabilities for more complex setups.

    80%
  • Power Supply

    75% of users were satisfied with the power supply options, appreciating the convenience of USB power which eliminated the need for additional adapters and made mobile use straightforward.

    25% of users were dissatisfied with the power supply, mainly due to concerns about relying solely on USB power which, in some cases, limited use with certain devices or configurations.

    75%
  • User Manual

    73% of users found the user manual helpful, providing clear instructions and guidance for setup and troubleshooting, which was beneficial for new users.

    27% of users were dissatisfied with the user manual, citing a lack of depth in explanations or insufficient detail for complex troubleshooting, which left them seeking additional support.

    73%
  • Overall Satisfaction

    88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Arturia MiniFuse 1, noting it as a reliable and high-quality interface that met their recording needs and offered excellent value for money.

    12% of users were not fully satisfied, often due to specific issues that affected their experience, such as software compatibility or connectivity limitations, which they found restrictive for their projects.

    88%
Show More
Pros:
  • High-quality preamps for clear sound recording.
  • USB-C connectivity provides fast and reliable data transfer.
  • Compact and portable design.
  • Easy to use with straightforward controls and setup.
  • Included software package offers great value.
  • Affordable price point for entry-level users.
  • Compact and portable design, easy to carry.
  • USB Type-C connectivity ensures fast data transfer and compatibility with modern devices.
  • High-quality preamps provide clear sound quality.
  • Comes with a software bundle including Ableton Live Lite and other useful tools.
Cons:
  • Limited to 2 input channels, which may not suffice for larger setups.
  • No MIDI input/output ports.
  • Phantom power is not individually switchable for each input.
  • Higher price compared to some entry-level audio interfaces.
  • Requires a computer to function, not standalone.
  • Limited to a single input, which may not be sufficient for more complex recording needs.
  • No MIDI input/output, limiting connectivity to MIDI devices.
  • Plastic build may not be as durable as metal alternatives.
  • Lacks advanced features found in higher-end audio interfaces.
Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog:
2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Analog:
1 Input / 2 Outputs
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit 192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
1 1 Preamp
Analog Audio I/O
1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input
1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel)
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output
1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel)
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output
1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Host Connection
1x USB-C 1x USB-C
OS Compatibility
macOS
Windows
macOS
Windows
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included) USB Bus Power

When comparing the Arturia MiniFuse 1 and the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interfaces, both devices offer impressive specifications suitable for various recording needs. The Arturia MiniFuse 1 features a 1 Input / 2 Outputs configuration, while the Focusrite Scarlett Solo provides a slightly more versatile 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs setup. Both interfaces support a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz / 24-Bit, ensuring high-quality audio capture and playback.Show More


In terms of microphone inputs, both interfaces come equipped with 1 Microphone Preamp. The Arturia MiniFuse 1 includes a 1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input, while the Scarlett Solo features a 1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input and a 1/4" TS Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input. This gives the Scarlett Solo a slight edge in flexibility for connecting different types of sources, including instruments.


Regarding output options, the Arturia MiniFuse 1 offers 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Outputs and a 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output, while the Scarlett Solo provides 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Outputs and a 1/4" TRS Headphone Output. Both interfaces utilize a USB-C connection for host compatibility and are designed to work seamlessly with macOS and Windows operating systems.


Power requirements for both devices are satisfied through USB Bus Power, although the Scarlett Solo also offers the option for a USB Power Adapter (not included), providing additional flexibility in powering the device. Overall, both the Arturia MiniFuse 1 and Focusrite Scarlett Solo present strong features that cater to different user needs, with the Scarlett Solo providing a more extensive input configuration while the MiniFuse 1 focuses on portability and simplicity.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog:
2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Analog:
1 Input / 2 Outputs
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit 192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
1 1 Preamp
Input Level Adjustment
2x Knob 1x Knob
Expansion Slots

The Arturia MiniFuse 1 is a portable 1x2 USB Type-C audio interface that offers 1 input and 2 outputs. It supports a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz with a bit depth of 24-bit. This interface is designed with a single microphone preamp, allowing for straightforward recording tasks. The input level adjustment is simplified with 1 knob, making it user-friendly for those who prefer a minimalist setup.Show More


On the other hand, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) provides a slightly more versatile configuration with 2 inputs and 2 outputs, while also supporting a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz and 24-bit depth. Similar to the MiniFuse, it includes 1 microphone input but stands out with its 2 knobs for input level adjustments, allowing for more precise control over both input channels. However, it does not feature built-in DSP or expansion slots.


In summary, both audio interfaces offer high-quality audio performance with a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz and 24-bit depth. The Arturia MiniFuse 1 is tailored for users who require a simple, portable solution with a single input, while the Focusrite Scarlett Solo appeals to those looking for more input flexibility with its 2 inputs and 2 outputs, accompanied by additional control through 2 knobs for level adjustments.

Signal Processing
Gain/Trim Range
Mic/Line Inputs:
Up to +69 dB
Hi-Z Inputs:
62 dB
Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs:
56 dB

The Arturia MiniFuse 1 is designed as a portable 1x2 USB Type-C audio interface, featuring a gain/trim range of 56 dB for its mic, line, and Hi-Z inputs. However, it does not include a pad option, high-pass filter, or solo/mute functionality, which may limit its versatility in certain recording scenarios. This design choice may appeal to users looking for a straightforward interface without additional complexities.Show More


In contrast, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) boasts a more robust gain/trim range, offering up to +69 dB for mic/line inputs and 62 dB for Hi-Z inputs. This greater range allows for more flexibility and control over the recording levels, which can be particularly beneficial for capturing a diverse array of sound sources. The Scarlett Solo also lacks a pad option but compensates with its higher gain capabilities, making it suitable for a wider range of microphones and instruments.


Overall, while the Arturia MiniFuse 1 serves as a compact and simple audio interface, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo offers enhanced gain options, making it a more versatile choice for users requiring greater control over their recordings. The selection between these two interfaces will largely depend on the specific needs of the user and the types of recordings they intend to make.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input
1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel)
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output
1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel)
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output
1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Phantom Power
48 V, Selectable On/Off 48 V, Selectable On/Off
Digital Audio I/O
Host Connection
1x USB-C 1x USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0 USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)
1x USB-A (USB 2.0, Device Connection)
Sync I/O
Network I/O
MIDI I/O

The Arturia MiniFuse 1 and Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation) are both compact USB-C audio interfaces designed for musicians and podcasters seeking high-quality audio recording. The MiniFuse 1 features a 1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input on the front panel, while the Scarlett Solo offers a 1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input and a 1/4" TS Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input. Both interfaces support 48 V phantom power that can be selected on or off, catering to condenser microphones.Show More


In terms of output options, the MiniFuse 1 includes 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Outputs and a 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output, while the Scarlett Solo provides 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Outputs and a 1/4" TRS Headphone Output. This gives the MiniFuse a slight edge in flexibility with its additional line outputs, which can be beneficial for connecting to various monitoring systems.


Both devices utilize USB-C connections and support USB 2.0 protocol, making them compatible with most modern computers. However, the MiniFuse 1 features a USB-A port for device connection, allowing for additional connectivity options. In contrast, the Scarlett Solo does not offer a USB (Non-Host) connection. Neither interface includes digital audio I/O, sync I/O, network I/O, or MIDI I/O, making them straightforward solutions for basic audio recording needs.


In summary, the Arturia MiniFuse 1 stands out with its additional output options and USB connectivity, while the Focusrite Scarlett Solo remains a solid choice for those prioritizing simplicity and quality in a compact package. Both interfaces are designed to deliver excellent audio performance, catering to different user preferences and recording scenarios.

Performance
Frequency Response
XLR Mic Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB
1/4" Line Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.05 dB
1/4" Hi-Z Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.15 dB
Mic Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB (Min Gain)
Hi-Z Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB (Min Gain)
Line Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.05 dB (Min Gain)
Line Outputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.09 dB
Headphone Outputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.09 dB
Maximum Input Level
XLR Mic:
9.5 dBu
1/4" Line:
22 dBu
1/4" Hi-Z:
12 dBu
Mic Inputs:
+9 dBu
Hi-Z Inputs:
+11.5 dBu
Line Inputs:
+22 dBu
Maximum Output Level
1/4" Line:
+16 dBu
Line Outputs:
+12 dBu
Headphone Outputs:
+11.4 dBu
Headphone Output Power
1/4":
32 mW into 33 Ohms
22 mW into 300 Ohms
137 mW into 33 Ohms
Impedance
XLR Mic Inputs:
3 Kilohms
1/4" Line Inputs:
60 Kilohms
1/4" Hi-Z Inputs:
1 Megohms
1/4" Line Outputs:
200 Ohms
1/4" Headphone Outputs:
< 50 Ohm
Mic Inputs:
2.5 Kilohms
Hi-Z Inputs:
1 Megohm
Line Inputs:
16 Kilohms
Line Outputs:
94 Ohms
Headphone Outputs:
10 Ohms
Dynamic Range
XLR Mic Inputs:
113 dBA
1/4" Line Inputs:
113 dBA
1/4" Hi-Z Inputs:
112 dBA
1/4" Line Outputs:
120 dB
1/4" Headphone:
112 dB (at 33 Ohms)
115 dB (at 300 Ohms)
Digital A/D Converters:
120 dB
Digital D/A Converters:
130 dBA
Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs:
110 dB (A-Weighted)
Line Outputs:
107.5 dB (A-Weighted)
Headphone Outputs:
104 dB (A-Weighted)
THD+N
XLR Mic Inputs:
-100 dB (at Minimum Gain)
1/4" Line Inputs:
-100 dB (at 8 dB Gain)
1/4" Hi-Z Inputs:
-80 dB (at Minimum Gain)
1/4" Line Outputs:
-100 dB (at Minimum Gain)
1/4" Headphone Outputs:
-97 dB (at 33 Ohms)
-102 dB (at 300 Ohms)
Digital A/D Converters:
-110 dB
Digital D/A Converters:
-115 dB
Mic Inputs:
-100 dB (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Typical)
Hi-Z Inputs:
-91 dB (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Typical)
Line Inputs:
-100 dB (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Typical)
Line Outputs:
-101 dB (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Typical)
EIN
XLR Mic Inputs:
-127 dBu A-Weighted
Mic Inputs:
-129 dB A-Weighted

When comparing the Arturia MiniFuse 1 and the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation), both audio interfaces offer impressive specifications, yet they cater to slightly different needs in terms of performance. The Arturia MiniFuse 1 features a frequency response for mic, Hi-Z, and line inputs ranging from 20 Hz to 20 kHz with minimal gain variations, while the Scarlett Solo also shares a similar frequency response, ensuring high fidelity in audio capture.Show More


In terms of maximum input levels, the MiniFuse 1 supports mic inputs at +9 dBu, Hi-Z inputs at +11.5 dBu, and line inputs at +22 dBu. The Scarlett Solo, on the other hand, has slightly different parameters with its XLR mic input at +9.5 dBu, Hi-Z input at +12 dBu, and line input also at +22 dBu. This means the MiniFuse 1 has a marginally better Hi-Z input level, which may be beneficial for guitarists or those using high-impedance instruments.


When considering maximum output levels, the MiniFuse 1 provides line outputs at +12 dBu and headphone outputs at +11.4 dBu. In contrast, the Scarlett Solo boasts a higher line output level of +16 dBu, which may allow for a stronger signal to external devices. Additionally, the headphone output power of the MiniFuse 1 is rated at 137 mW into 33 Ohms, compared to the Scarlett Solo's 32 mW into 33 Ohms, making the MiniFuse a more powerful option for headphone monitoring.


In terms of dynamics and noise performance, the MiniFuse 1 shows a dynamic range of 110 dB for mic, line, and Hi-Z inputs, while the Scarlett Solo achieves a slightly higher dynamic range of 113 dBA for its mic inputs. The THD+N specifications also reveal that both interfaces excel in low distortion, with the MiniFuse 1 showing -100 dB for mic inputs and the Scarlett Solo matching that at -100 dB for its XLR mic inputs, showcasing their capabilities in delivering clean audio signals.


Lastly, when evaluating electrical noise (EIN), the MiniFuse 1 has a lower noise floor at -129 dB for mic inputs compared to the Scarlett Solo's -127 dBu. This indicates that the MiniFuse 1 might be slightly more favorable for capturing quiet sources without introducing additional noise. Overall, both interfaces present excellent features, yet the choice ultimately depends on individual needs regarding input sensitivity, output levels, and power for monitoring.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 / 176.4 / 192 kHz 44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 / 176.4 / 192 kHz
Bit Depths
24-Bit 24-Bit
Sync Sources
Internal Internal

The Arturia MiniFuse 1 and the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation) both offer impressive specifications, particularly in terms of sample rates and bit depths. Both interfaces support a range of sample rates including 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, 176.4, and 192 kHz, ensuring high-quality audio capture and playback. Additionally, they both operate at a bit depth of 24-Bit, which is essential for professional audio production.Show More


One key difference between the two models is the latency management. The Arturia MiniFuse 1 provides Zero-Latency Direct Monitoring, allowing users to hear their input signal without any delay, which can be crucial during recording sessions. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo, while also featuring internal sync sources, does not specifically mention zero-latency monitoring, which may be a consideration for users prioritizing real-time audio feedback.


In terms of synchronization, both devices utilize internal sync sources, which ensures stable audio performance. This feature is standard across many audio interfaces and is important for maintaining timing accuracy during recordings. Overall, while both the Arturia MiniFuse 1 and the Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Generation share many core features, the MiniFuse's direct monitoring capability could provide an edge for users who need immediate audio response during their sessions.

Audio Storage & Playback
Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS
Windows
macOS
Windows

The Arturia MiniFuse 1 Portable 1x2 USB Type-C Audio Interface is designed for seamless integration with both macOS and Windows operating systems. It requires an available USB 2.0 port and comes with a USB cable included. However, it is important to note that an internet connection is required for registration, software, and driver download, which may be a consideration for users with limited connectivity.Show More


In contrast, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) also supports macOS and Windows compatibility. A notable feature of this interface is its mobile app compatibility, specifically for iPadOS only, which provides additional versatility for users who prefer to work on mobile devices. This can enhance workflow for musicians and producers who are frequently on the move.


Ultimately, both interfaces offer robust performance and compatibility with popular operating systems. The Arturia MiniFuse 1 emphasizes its portability and the requirement for an internet connection for initial setup, while the Focusrite Scarlett Solo enhances its appeal with mobile app support for iPadOS. Users should evaluate their specific needs and usage scenarios when choosing between these two audio interfaces.

Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included) USB Bus Power

The Arturia MiniFuse 1 is designed for portability and convenience, relying solely on USB Bus Power for operation. This makes it an excellent choice for musicians and podcasters who need to record on the go without the hassle of carrying extra power supplies. The simplicity of its power requirements allows for a streamlined setup, perfect for mobile recording scenarios.Show More


In contrast, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) also operates on USB Bus Power but offers the additional option of using a USB Power Adapter (not included) for enhanced flexibility. This means users can power the device via a standard AC/DC power adapter rated at 5 VDC at 900 mA, which can be particularly useful in studio settings where reliable power is essential. The added capability allows for a more robust power consumption of 4.5 W, ensuring stable performance during lengthy recording sessions.


Overall, while both interfaces prioritize portability with their USB Bus Power capabilities, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo provides a more versatile power solution that can be advantageous for those needing consistent power in various environments. Meanwhile, the Arturia MiniFuse 1 excels in keeping things lightweight and uncomplicated for mobile use.

Physical
Dimensions
5.63 x 3.78 x 1.79" / 14.3 x 9.6 x 4.55 cm 5.9 x 3.9 x 1.6" / 15 x 9.9 x 4.1 cm
Weight
0.8 lb / 363.0 g 0.9 lb / 0.4 kg

When comparing the Arturia MiniFuse 1 and the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation), it is essential to note the physical dimensions and weight of each device. The Arturia MiniFuse 1 measures 5.9 x 3.9 x 1.6 inches (15 x 9.9 x 4.1 cm) and weighs 0.9 lb (0.4 kg), making it slightly larger and heavier than its competitor. In contrast, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo has dimensions of 5.63 x 3.78 x 1.79 inches (14.3 x 9.6 x 4.55 cm) and a weight of 0.8 lb (363.0 g), which renders it more compact and lightweight.Show More


Another notable feature of the Arturia MiniFuse 1 is its Kensington Security Slot, providing an added layer of security for users who may need to safeguard their equipment in shared or public spaces. This feature is absent in the Focusrite Scarlett Solo, which may be a consideration for users prioritizing device security.


In summary, while both audio interfaces are designed for portability, the Arturia MiniFuse 1 offers a Kensington Security Slot, which enhances its security profile. However, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo is slightly smaller and lighter, potentially making it a more convenient choice for users seeking a compact solution.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
1.305 lb 1.025 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
7.2 x 6.1 x 2.5" 6.9 x 5.3 x 1.9"

The Arturia MiniFuse 1 is a compact and lightweight audio interface, with a package weight of 1.025 lb and box dimensions measuring 6.9 x 5.3 x 1.9 inches. This makes it an ideal choice for musicians and podcasters who require portability without sacrificing functionality. Its small size allows for easy transport, making it suitable for on-the-go recording sessions.Show More


In contrast, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation) weighs 1.305 lb and comes in a slightly larger package with dimensions of 7.2 x 6.1 x 2.5 inches. While still relatively portable, it is marginally heavier and bulkier compared to the MiniFuse 1. This may be a consideration for users who prioritize a lightweight setup.


Overall, while both audio interfaces offer quality performance, the Arturia MiniFuse 1 stands out for its lighter weight and more compact dimensions, making it a preferable option for those who travel frequently with their gear. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo, while a bit larger and heavier, still remains a solid choice for those who may value its specific features or brand reputation over portability.

Customer Images
Videos