PreSonus Revelator io24 vs MOTU M2: Which Audio Interface Suits You Best?

The PreSonus Revelator io24 Desktop 2x4 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface is a versatile tool designed for musicians, podcasters, and streaming enthusiasts. It features two pristine XMAX-L microphone preamps, which are known for their low noise and high headroom, ensuring clear and professional-quality recordings. The interface boasts a 24-bit/96 kHz audio resolution, offering a high-fidelity audio experience. It includes loopback channels for easy audio streaming and recording, making it an excellent choice for content creators who need to integrate live and recorded audio seamlessly. The Revelator io24 also comes with onboard effects and processing, allowing users to add EQ and compression directly to their audio input, and it integrates seamlessly with PreSonus' Studio One Artist DAW, which is included with the purchase.

On the other hand, the MOTU M2 Audio Interface is renowned for its ultra-low latency performance, providing near real-time monitoring and playback. It also supports a 24-bit/192 kHz audio resolution, offering a slightly higher sample rate than the Revelator io24, which could be a decisive factor for audiophiles seeking the best possible sound quality. The MOTU M2 features two ESS Sabre32 Ultra DACs, known for their excellent dynamic range and low distortion, contributing to its superior audio performance. The interface comes with a full-color LCD screen that provides detailed metering for both input and output levels, allowing users to monitor their audio levels visually and accurately. It includes a loopback function as well, catering to the needs of streamers and podcasters who require flexible audio routing.

Both interfaces offer USB Type-C connectivity, ensuring fast data transfer and compatibility with modern devices. While the PreSonus Revelator io24 is particularly appealing to users looking for integrated DSP effects and a more comprehensive software bundle, the MOTU M2 stands out for its high-end DACs and superior metering capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between these two interfaces will depend on the specific needs of the user, whether they prioritize onboard processing and software integration or superior audio fidelity and detailed metering.

In the following sections, we will delve into a detailed comparison of the PreSonus Revelator io24 Desktop 2x4 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the MOTU M2 Audio Interface. This article thoroughly examines their specifications and provides insights into their advantages and disadvantages, helping you make an informed decision based on your specific audio requirements.

Detailed Comparison of PreSonus Revelator io24 and MOTU M2

PreSonus Revelator io24

MOTU M2

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the PreSonus Revelator io24, praising its affordability compared to other interfaces with similar features. Many users highlighted the interface's excellent sound quality and versatile functionality, which they found to be a great bargain within its price range. 15% of users felt dissatisfied with the purchase value, arguing that the price was slightly elevated for beginners who might not utilize all its features. Some also mentioned that they experienced issues that required additional investment in support or replacements. 85% Quality of Materials 80% of users expressed satisfaction with the quality of materials, noting that the build felt robust and durable. They appreciated the compact design and the sturdy knobs and buttons, which contributed to a reliable user experience over time. 20% of users were not satisfied with the material quality, mentioning that some components felt plasticky and not as durable as expected. A few users reported that the knobs became loose after extended use, raising concerns about long-term durability. 80% Sound Quality 90% of users were thrilled with the sound quality, highlighting the clean and clear audio output. They frequently mentioned that the preamps delivered professional-level sound, which was a significant advantage for both home studios and professional recording settings. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the sound quality, primarily due to issues with noise interference in specific environments. Some reported that the sound was not as pristine when compared to higher-end interfaces, which affected their recording quality. 90% Ease of Use 75% of users found the interface to be user-friendly, appreciating the intuitive layout and straightforward setup process. They noted that the accompanying software was easy to navigate, which helped in quickly getting their recording projects underway. 25% of users faced challenges with ease of use, citing a steep learning curve with the software and controls. Some users found the manual insufficient for troubleshooting, leading to frustration during initial setup and configuration. 75% Software Integration 70% of users were satisfied with the software integration, particularly praising the compatibility with major DAWs and the feature-rich applications that came with the interface. They found the software added significant value to their purchase. 30% of users encountered issues with software integration, reporting frequent glitches and compatibility problems with their existing setups. Some users had difficulty getting the software to recognize the interface, which hindered their recording process. 70% Portability 88% of users were happy with the portability of the PreSonus Revelator io24, noting its compact size and lightweight design made it perfect for mobile recording. They appreciated being able to easily transport it between different locations without hassle. 12% of users were less impressed with the portability, mainly because they expected additional protective casing for travel. Some expressed concerns about the durability of the unit when frequently moved. 88% Customer Support 65% of users were satisfied with customer support, citing responsive and helpful staff who provided timely solutions to their issues. They appreciated the guidance and troubleshooting assistance received. 35% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, mentioning long wait times and unhelpful responses. Some users felt that their issues were not adequately addressed, leading to unresolved problems. 65% Setup Process 78% of users found the setup process straightforward, with many commenting on the clear instructions and ease of installation. The step-by-step guidance provided was deemed sufficient for most users. 22% of users faced difficulties during the setup process, reporting complications with driver installations and connectivity issues. Some users spent additional time troubleshooting due to unclear instructions. 78% Design Aesthetics 82% of users appreciated the design aesthetics, highlighting its sleek, modern look and intuitive control layout. They felt that the design was not only attractive but also functional, enhancing their studio setup. 18% of users were not entirely satisfied with the design aesthetics, feeling that the interface lacked unique visual appeal. Some users found the design too simplistic and desired more distinctive features. 82% Durability 77% of users were content with the durability of the interface, noting that it held up well under regular use. They appreciated the sturdy construction that seemed to withstand daily wear and tear. 23% of users were disappointed with the durability, reporting issues such as buttons and connectors becoming loose over time. Some users experienced malfunctions after a few months of use. 77% Latency 85% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance, praising its effectiveness in ensuring real-time monitoring without noticeable delays. This aspect was particularly appreciated by musicians and podcasters. 15% of users experienced latency issues, which were more pronounced when using specific software or settings. Some found the latency problematic for precise audio production work. 85% Connectivity Options 84% of users were pleased with the variety of connectivity options, including the USB Type-C interface, which provided fast and reliable connections. The availability of MIDI integration was also a plus for many users. 16% of users were not entirely happy with the connectivity options, citing limited input/output ports for their specific needs. Some users needed additional adapters or equipment to accommodate their setups. 84% Compatibility 81% of users found the interface compatible with a wide range of devices and software, which facilitated seamless integration into their existing setups. This compatibility was noted as a significant benefit. 19% of users faced compatibility challenges, especially with older operating systems or less common DAWs. Some users needed to update or change their software to ensure proper functionality. 81% Preamps 88% of users were impressed with the quality of the preamps, noting their clarity and ability to handle various microphones effectively. The preamps were often compared favorably to those in more expensive models. 12% of users were less satisfied with the preamps, finding them insufficient for high-end professional recording. Some users reported distortion at higher gain levels, which affected their recording quality. 88% Versatility 86% of users appreciated the versatility of the PreSonus Revelator io24, highlighting its multiple use cases for music production, podcasting, and streaming. Users found the interface adaptable across different projects. 14% of users felt the interface lacked versatility, primarily due to limitations in advanced features needed for specific professional applications. Some expressed a desire for more customizable settings. 86% Size 89% of users were satisfied with the compact size of the interface, which fit well into small studio spaces and made it convenient for desktop setups. The size was particularly praised for not compromising on functionality. 11% of users found the size a limitation, especially those who preferred larger interfaces with more onboard controls. Some felt the size restricted the number of physical inputs available. 89% Learning Curve 72% of users found the learning curve manageable, with resources like tutorials and community forums aiding them in mastering the interface. They appreciated the logical layout of controls and software. 28% of users struggled with the learning curve, particularly those new to audio interfaces. They pointed out a lack of comprehensive guides to help them fully utilize all features, leading to a prolonged adjustment period. 72% Power Supply 83% of users were pleased with the power supply options, especially the USB-powered feature which allowed for easy setup without additional power cables. This was seen as a convenient and efficient solution. 17% of users encountered power supply issues, noting that the interface sometimes drew too much power from laptops, leading to connectivity problems. Some users preferred an external power option for stability. 83% Driver Stability 74% of users were satisfied with the stability of the drivers, reporting minimal crashes or interruptions during use. The steady performance was crucial for uninterrupted recording sessions. 26% of users faced driver stability issues, experiencing occasional disconnections and software crashes. These interruptions were particularly problematic during live recordings and broadcasts. 74% Brand Reputation 90% of users trusted PreSonus as a reputable brand, citing positive past experiences and reliable products. The brand's reputation for quality and innovation contributed to their purchase decision. 10% of users were skeptical about the brand reputation, often due to prior issues with PreSonus products or support. Some users felt the brand overpromised on features that didn't meet their expectations. 90%	Purchase Value 85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the MOTU M2 Audio Interface, highlighting its competitive pricing compared to other interfaces with similar features. Many users appreciated the combination of high-quality sound and functionality at a reasonable cost, making it an attractive choice for both amateur and professional musicians. 15% of users felt dissatisfied with the purchase value, citing instances where they expected more advanced features or additional accessories for the price. Some users compared it unfavorably to cheaper alternatives that offered similar performance, which led to disappointment with the perceived value. 85% Sound Quality 90% of users praised the sound quality of the MOTU M2, noting its clear and crisp audio output and excellent preamps. Users frequently mentioned the superior quality of both the input and output, which they felt enhanced their recording and listening experiences significantly. 10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, often due to specific technical issues or personal preferences for different audio signatures. Some users experienced noise interference or felt that the sound output did not meet their high expectations, particularly in professional settings. 90% Build Quality 88% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the MOTU M2, appreciating its sturdy construction and durable materials. Many users mentioned the robust design, which they felt was reliable for both studio and mobile use, instilling confidence in its longevity. 12% of users were dissatisfied with the build quality, citing issues such as loose knobs or connectors. Some users found the materials used to be less premium than expected, leading to concerns about potential wear and tear over time. 88% Ease of Use 83% of users found the MOTU M2 easy to use, highlighting its straightforward setup process and intuitive interface. Users appreciated the simple layout, which allowed even beginners to quickly understand and operate the device without extensive technical knowledge. 17% of users experienced difficulties with ease of use, often due to software compatibility issues or a lack of clear instructions. Some users reported a steep learning curve for specific functions, which affected their overall user experience. 83% Driver Stability 80% of users were satisfied with the stability of the MOTU M2 drivers, noting few crashes or disconnections during use. This reliability was particularly valued by users who required consistent performance for professional recording sessions. 20% of users encountered driver stability issues, including occasional crashes or lag, affecting their workflow. These users often experienced frustration when the interface did not perform consistently, particularly during critical recording tasks. 80% Customer Support 75% of users had positive experiences with MOTU's customer support, appreciating the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. Users who required assistance found the customer service to be knowledgeable and capable of resolving issues promptly. 25% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delays in response times or unhelpful interactions. Some users felt that their concerns were not adequately addressed, which led to frustration with the level of service provided. 75% Portability 85% of users praised the portability of the MOTU M2, mentioning its compact size and lightweight design as ideal for on-the-go recording. Users found it easy to transport and use in different environments, making it a versatile choice for mobile musicians. 15% of users found the portability lacking, often due to the need for additional accessories or concerns about durability during transport. Some users desired a more compact form factor or integrated protective features for easier travel. 85% Latency Performance 87% of users were satisfied with the latency performance of the MOTU M2, noting minimal delay during recording and playback. This low latency was particularly appreciated by musicians who required real-time monitoring without noticeable lag. 13% of users experienced latency issues, which affected their recording sessions. Some users found the latency to be higher than expected, especially when using specific software or settings, leading to dissatisfaction with the interface's performance. 87% Compatibility 82% of users highlighted the compatibility of the MOTU M2 with various operating systems and digital audio workstations, allowing seamless integration into existing setups. The device's versatility in working with Mac and Windows platforms was a significant advantage for many. 18% of users faced compatibility challenges, often related to specific software or hardware configurations. These users experienced difficulties in integrating the interface with their preferred setups, which led to dissatisfaction with the overall compatibility. 82% Input/Output Options 80% of users were satisfied with the input and output options offered by the MOTU M2, appreciating the variety and quality of connections available. Users valued the balanced input and output ports, which provided flexibility for different recording needs. 20% of users found the input/output options lacking, desiring more channels or specific types of connections. Some users required additional ports for complex setups, which the M2 did not accommodate, leading to disappointment. 80% Aesthetics 88% of users found the aesthetics of the MOTU M2 appealing, praising its sleek design and professional look. The interface's modern appearance was often noted as a positive feature that complemented their studio setups. 12% of users were dissatisfied with the aesthetics, often preferring a different style or color scheme. Some users felt the design was too simplistic or did not match their personal taste, which affected their overall impression of the device. 88% Installation Process 84% of users found the installation process for the MOTU M2 straightforward and hassle-free, with clear instructions and minimal setup time. This ease of installation was especially appreciated by users who wanted to start using the device quickly. 16% of users encountered challenges during the installation process, including difficulties with software installation or required updates. These issues led to frustration, particularly for users who expected a more seamless setup experience. 84% Software Features 78% of users were satisfied with the software features included with the MOTU M2, appreciating the basic tools and functionality provided for recording and editing. Users found the software adequate for most of their needs, especially when starting out. 22% of users found the software features lacking, desiring more advanced options or additional plug-ins. Some users felt the software was limited compared to other interfaces, which affected their ability to fully utilize the device's potential. 78% Durability 86% of users were satisfied with the durability of the MOTU M2, noting its solid construction and resistance to wear over time. Users appreciated the robust materials that provided confidence in the device's long-term reliability. 14% of users were concerned about the durability, often due to issues with specific components like knobs or buttons. Some users experienced wear and tear sooner than expected, which raised doubts about the interface's longevity. 86% Versatility 83% of users praised the versatility of the MOTU M2, citing its ability to handle various recording scenarios and environments. Users valued its adaptability for different music genres and recording setups, making it a flexible choice for many applications. 17% of users found the versatility limited, often due to specific requirements that the M2 could not meet. Some users needed more features or customization options for particular projects, which the device did not provide, leading to dissatisfaction. 83% Control Features 79% of users were satisfied with the control features of the MOTU M2, appreciating the accessible and functional design of the controls. Users found the controls intuitive and effective for managing their audio settings during use. 21% of users were dissatisfied with the control features, often finding them too basic or lacking in advanced options. Some users desired more precise or customizable controls to better suit their specific audio needs. 79% Power Options 82% of users appreciated the power options of the MOTU M2, noting the convenience of USB power for portability and ease of use. Users valued the ability to operate the device without the need for additional power sources, enhancing its mobility. 18% of users found the power options limiting, often preferring alternative power solutions for specific setups. Some users experienced issues with power stability, particularly when using the interface in environments with variable power availability. 82% Expandability 77% of users were satisfied with the expandability of the MOTU M2, finding it sufficient for basic studio setups and small-scale projects. Users appreciated the ability to connect additional devices as needed within its scope. 23% of users found the expandability insufficient, particularly for larger or more complex audio setups. Some users desired more connectivity options or the ability to chain multiple interfaces together, which the M2 did not support. 77% Pedal Integration 70% of users appreciated the basic pedal integration capabilities of the MOTU M2, finding it suitable for simple setups and straightforward use. Users valued the available connections for integrating pedals into their signal chain. 30% of users were dissatisfied with the pedal integration options, often requiring more advanced features or specific connections. Some users found the integration limited for complex pedal setups, which affected their ability to use the interface effectively. 70% Visual Display 89% of users were highly satisfied with the visual display of the MOTU M2, praising its clear and informative readouts. Users found the display helpful for monitoring levels and making quick adjustments during recording sessions. 11% of users found the visual display lacking, often desiring more detailed information or customizable display options. Some users felt the display could be improved for better visibility in different lighting conditions. 89% Overall Satisfaction 87% of users reported overall satisfaction with the MOTU M2, citing its combination of high-quality sound, build, and functionality as major strengths. Users appreciated its value for money and suitability for a wide range of applications, making it a popular choice among audio enthusiasts. 13% of users expressed overall dissatisfaction, often due to specific unmet expectations or technical issues. Some users encountered compatibility or performance problems that detracted from their experience, leading to disappointment with the interface. 87% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the PreSonus Revelator io24, praising its affordability compared to other interfaces with similar features. Many users highlighted the interface's excellent sound quality and versatile functionality, which they found to be a great bargain within its price range.

15% of users felt dissatisfied with the purchase value, arguing that the price was slightly elevated for beginners who might not utilize all its features. Some also mentioned that they experienced issues that required additional investment in support or replacements.

85%
Quality of Materials

80% of users expressed satisfaction with the quality of materials, noting that the build felt robust and durable. They appreciated the compact design and the sturdy knobs and buttons, which contributed to a reliable user experience over time.

20% of users were not satisfied with the material quality, mentioning that some components felt plasticky and not as durable as expected. A few users reported that the knobs became loose after extended use, raising concerns about long-term durability.

80%
Sound Quality

90% of users were thrilled with the sound quality, highlighting the clean and clear audio output. They frequently mentioned that the preamps delivered professional-level sound, which was a significant advantage for both home studios and professional recording settings.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the sound quality, primarily due to issues with noise interference in specific environments. Some reported that the sound was not as pristine when compared to higher-end interfaces, which affected their recording quality.

90%
Ease of Use

75% of users found the interface to be user-friendly, appreciating the intuitive layout and straightforward setup process. They noted that the accompanying software was easy to navigate, which helped in quickly getting their recording projects underway.

25% of users faced challenges with ease of use, citing a steep learning curve with the software and controls. Some users found the manual insufficient for troubleshooting, leading to frustration during initial setup and configuration.

75%
Software Integration

70% of users were satisfied with the software integration, particularly praising the compatibility with major DAWs and the feature-rich applications that came with the interface. They found the software added significant value to their purchase.

30% of users encountered issues with software integration, reporting frequent glitches and compatibility problems with their existing setups. Some users had difficulty getting the software to recognize the interface, which hindered their recording process.

70%
Portability

88% of users were happy with the portability of the PreSonus Revelator io24, noting its compact size and lightweight design made it perfect for mobile recording. They appreciated being able to easily transport it between different locations without hassle.

12% of users were less impressed with the portability, mainly because they expected additional protective casing for travel. Some expressed concerns about the durability of the unit when frequently moved.

88%
Customer Support

65% of users were satisfied with customer support, citing responsive and helpful staff who provided timely solutions to their issues. They appreciated the guidance and troubleshooting assistance received.

35% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, mentioning long wait times and unhelpful responses. Some users felt that their issues were not adequately addressed, leading to unresolved problems.

65%
Setup Process

78% of users found the setup process straightforward, with many commenting on the clear instructions and ease of installation. The step-by-step guidance provided was deemed sufficient for most users.

22% of users faced difficulties during the setup process, reporting complications with driver installations and connectivity issues. Some users spent additional time troubleshooting due to unclear instructions.

78%
Design Aesthetics

82% of users appreciated the design aesthetics, highlighting its sleek, modern look and intuitive control layout. They felt that the design was not only attractive but also functional, enhancing their studio setup.

18% of users were not entirely satisfied with the design aesthetics, feeling that the interface lacked unique visual appeal. Some users found the design too simplistic and desired more distinctive features.

82%
Durability

77% of users were content with the durability of the interface, noting that it held up well under regular use. They appreciated the sturdy construction that seemed to withstand daily wear and tear.

23% of users were disappointed with the durability, reporting issues such as buttons and connectors becoming loose over time. Some users experienced malfunctions after a few months of use.

77%
Latency

85% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance, praising its effectiveness in ensuring real-time monitoring without noticeable delays. This aspect was particularly appreciated by musicians and podcasters.

15% of users experienced latency issues, which were more pronounced when using specific software or settings. Some found the latency problematic for precise audio production work.

85%
Connectivity Options

84% of users were pleased with the variety of connectivity options, including the USB Type-C interface, which provided fast and reliable connections. The availability of MIDI integration was also a plus for many users.

16% of users were not entirely happy with the connectivity options, citing limited input/output ports for their specific needs. Some users needed additional adapters or equipment to accommodate their setups.

84%
Compatibility

81% of users found the interface compatible with a wide range of devices and software, which facilitated seamless integration into their existing setups. This compatibility was noted as a significant benefit.

19% of users faced compatibility challenges, especially with older operating systems or less common DAWs. Some users needed to update or change their software to ensure proper functionality.

81%
Preamps

88% of users were impressed with the quality of the preamps, noting their clarity and ability to handle various microphones effectively. The preamps were often compared favorably to those in more expensive models.

12% of users were less satisfied with the preamps, finding them insufficient for high-end professional recording. Some users reported distortion at higher gain levels, which affected their recording quality.

88%
Versatility

86% of users appreciated the versatility of the PreSonus Revelator io24, highlighting its multiple use cases for music production, podcasting, and streaming. Users found the interface adaptable across different projects.

14% of users felt the interface lacked versatility, primarily due to limitations in advanced features needed for specific professional applications. Some expressed a desire for more customizable settings.

86%
Size

89% of users were satisfied with the compact size of the interface, which fit well into small studio spaces and made it convenient for desktop setups. The size was particularly praised for not compromising on functionality.

11% of users found the size a limitation, especially those who preferred larger interfaces with more onboard controls. Some felt the size restricted the number of physical inputs available.

89%
Learning Curve

72% of users found the learning curve manageable, with resources like tutorials and community forums aiding them in mastering the interface. They appreciated the logical layout of controls and software.

28% of users struggled with the learning curve, particularly those new to audio interfaces. They pointed out a lack of comprehensive guides to help them fully utilize all features, leading to a prolonged adjustment period.

72%
Power Supply

83% of users were pleased with the power supply options, especially the USB-powered feature which allowed for easy setup without additional power cables. This was seen as a convenient and efficient solution.

17% of users encountered power supply issues, noting that the interface sometimes drew too much power from laptops, leading to connectivity problems. Some users preferred an external power option for stability.

83%
Driver Stability

74% of users were satisfied with the stability of the drivers, reporting minimal crashes or interruptions during use. The steady performance was crucial for uninterrupted recording sessions.

26% of users faced driver stability issues, experiencing occasional disconnections and software crashes. These interruptions were particularly problematic during live recordings and broadcasts.

74%
Brand Reputation

90% of users trusted PreSonus as a reputable brand, citing positive past experiences and reliable products. The brand's reputation for quality and innovation contributed to their purchase decision.

10% of users were skeptical about the brand reputation, often due to prior issues with PreSonus products or support. Some users felt the brand overpromised on features that didn't meet their expectations.

90%

Purchase Value

85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the MOTU M2 Audio Interface, highlighting its competitive pricing compared to other interfaces with similar features. Many users appreciated the combination of high-quality sound and functionality at a reasonable cost, making it an attractive choice for both amateur and professional musicians.

15% of users felt dissatisfied with the purchase value, citing instances where they expected more advanced features or additional accessories for the price. Some users compared it unfavorably to cheaper alternatives that offered similar performance, which led to disappointment with the perceived value.

85%
Sound Quality

90% of users praised the sound quality of the MOTU M2, noting its clear and crisp audio output and excellent preamps. Users frequently mentioned the superior quality of both the input and output, which they felt enhanced their recording and listening experiences significantly.

10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, often due to specific technical issues or personal preferences for different audio signatures. Some users experienced noise interference or felt that the sound output did not meet their high expectations, particularly in professional settings.

90%
Build Quality

88% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the MOTU M2, appreciating its sturdy construction and durable materials. Many users mentioned the robust design, which they felt was reliable for both studio and mobile use, instilling confidence in its longevity.

12% of users were dissatisfied with the build quality, citing issues such as loose knobs or connectors. Some users found the materials used to be less premium than expected, leading to concerns about potential wear and tear over time.

88%
Ease of Use

83% of users found the MOTU M2 easy to use, highlighting its straightforward setup process and intuitive interface. Users appreciated the simple layout, which allowed even beginners to quickly understand and operate the device without extensive technical knowledge.

17% of users experienced difficulties with ease of use, often due to software compatibility issues or a lack of clear instructions. Some users reported a steep learning curve for specific functions, which affected their overall user experience.

83%
Driver Stability

80% of users were satisfied with the stability of the MOTU M2 drivers, noting few crashes or disconnections during use. This reliability was particularly valued by users who required consistent performance for professional recording sessions.

20% of users encountered driver stability issues, including occasional crashes or lag, affecting their workflow. These users often experienced frustration when the interface did not perform consistently, particularly during critical recording tasks.

80%
Customer Support

75% of users had positive experiences with MOTU's customer support, appreciating the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. Users who required assistance found the customer service to be knowledgeable and capable of resolving issues promptly.

25% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delays in response times or unhelpful interactions. Some users felt that their concerns were not adequately addressed, which led to frustration with the level of service provided.

75%
Portability

85% of users praised the portability of the MOTU M2, mentioning its compact size and lightweight design as ideal for on-the-go recording. Users found it easy to transport and use in different environments, making it a versatile choice for mobile musicians.

15% of users found the portability lacking, often due to the need for additional accessories or concerns about durability during transport. Some users desired a more compact form factor or integrated protective features for easier travel.

85%
Latency Performance

87% of users were satisfied with the latency performance of the MOTU M2, noting minimal delay during recording and playback. This low latency was particularly appreciated by musicians who required real-time monitoring without noticeable lag.

13% of users experienced latency issues, which affected their recording sessions. Some users found the latency to be higher than expected, especially when using specific software or settings, leading to dissatisfaction with the interface's performance.

87%
Compatibility

82% of users highlighted the compatibility of the MOTU M2 with various operating systems and digital audio workstations, allowing seamless integration into existing setups. The device's versatility in working with Mac and Windows platforms was a significant advantage for many.

18% of users faced compatibility challenges, often related to specific software or hardware configurations. These users experienced difficulties in integrating the interface with their preferred setups, which led to dissatisfaction with the overall compatibility.

82%
Input/Output Options

80% of users were satisfied with the input and output options offered by the MOTU M2, appreciating the variety and quality of connections available. Users valued the balanced input and output ports, which provided flexibility for different recording needs.

20% of users found the input/output options lacking, desiring more channels or specific types of connections. Some users required additional ports for complex setups, which the M2 did not accommodate, leading to disappointment.

80%
Aesthetics

88% of users found the aesthetics of the MOTU M2 appealing, praising its sleek design and professional look. The interface's modern appearance was often noted as a positive feature that complemented their studio setups.

12% of users were dissatisfied with the aesthetics, often preferring a different style or color scheme. Some users felt the design was too simplistic or did not match their personal taste, which affected their overall impression of the device.

88%
Installation Process

84% of users found the installation process for the MOTU M2 straightforward and hassle-free, with clear instructions and minimal setup time. This ease of installation was especially appreciated by users who wanted to start using the device quickly.

16% of users encountered challenges during the installation process, including difficulties with software installation or required updates. These issues led to frustration, particularly for users who expected a more seamless setup experience.

84%
Software Features

78% of users were satisfied with the software features included with the MOTU M2, appreciating the basic tools and functionality provided for recording and editing. Users found the software adequate for most of their needs, especially when starting out.

22% of users found the software features lacking, desiring more advanced options or additional plug-ins. Some users felt the software was limited compared to other interfaces, which affected their ability to fully utilize the device's potential.

78%
Durability

86% of users were satisfied with the durability of the MOTU M2, noting its solid construction and resistance to wear over time. Users appreciated the robust materials that provided confidence in the device's long-term reliability.

14% of users were concerned about the durability, often due to issues with specific components like knobs or buttons. Some users experienced wear and tear sooner than expected, which raised doubts about the interface's longevity.

86%
Versatility

83% of users praised the versatility of the MOTU M2, citing its ability to handle various recording scenarios and environments. Users valued its adaptability for different music genres and recording setups, making it a flexible choice for many applications.

17% of users found the versatility limited, often due to specific requirements that the M2 could not meet. Some users needed more features or customization options for particular projects, which the device did not provide, leading to dissatisfaction.

83%
Control Features

79% of users were satisfied with the control features of the MOTU M2, appreciating the accessible and functional design of the controls. Users found the controls intuitive and effective for managing their audio settings during use.

21% of users were dissatisfied with the control features, often finding them too basic or lacking in advanced options. Some users desired more precise or customizable controls to better suit their specific audio needs.

79%
Power Options

82% of users appreciated the power options of the MOTU M2, noting the convenience of USB power for portability and ease of use. Users valued the ability to operate the device without the need for additional power sources, enhancing its mobility.

18% of users found the power options limiting, often preferring alternative power solutions for specific setups. Some users experienced issues with power stability, particularly when using the interface in environments with variable power availability.

82%
Expandability

77% of users were satisfied with the expandability of the MOTU M2, finding it sufficient for basic studio setups and small-scale projects. Users appreciated the ability to connect additional devices as needed within its scope.

23% of users found the expandability insufficient, particularly for larger or more complex audio setups. Some users desired more connectivity options or the ability to chain multiple interfaces together, which the M2 did not support.

77%
Pedal Integration

70% of users appreciated the basic pedal integration capabilities of the MOTU M2, finding it suitable for simple setups and straightforward use. Users valued the available connections for integrating pedals into their signal chain.

30% of users were dissatisfied with the pedal integration options, often requiring more advanced features or specific connections. Some users found the integration limited for complex pedal setups, which affected their ability to use the interface effectively.

70%
Visual Display

89% of users were highly satisfied with the visual display of the MOTU M2, praising its clear and informative readouts. Users found the display helpful for monitoring levels and making quick adjustments during recording sessions.

11% of users found the visual display lacking, often desiring more detailed information or customizable display options. Some users felt the display could be improved for better visibility in different lighting conditions.

89%
Overall Satisfaction

87% of users reported overall satisfaction with the MOTU M2, citing its combination of high-quality sound, build, and functionality as major strengths. Users appreciated its value for money and suitability for a wide range of applications, making it a popular choice among audio enthusiasts.

13% of users expressed overall dissatisfaction, often due to specific unmet expectations or technical issues. Some users encountered compatibility or performance problems that detracted from their experience, leading to disappointment with the interface.

87%

Pros:
High-quality audio performance with 24-bit/96 kHz resolution. USB Type-C connectivity for fast and reliable data transfer. Built-in DSP for real-time effects processing. Compact and portable design, ideal for desktop use. Includes PreSonus Studio One Artist DAW software. Easy-to-use interface with clear visual feedback.	Excellent sound quality with ESS Sabre32 Ultra DAC technology. Low latency performance for real-time monitoring. Sturdy and compact build, suitable for mobile use. USB-C connectivity ensures fast data transfer. Clear and detailed LCD metering.

Cons:
Limited to 2x4 I/O, which might not be sufficient for larger setups. Higher price point compared to some other desktop interfaces. Requires a compatible USB Type-C port or adapter. Some users may find the learning curve for the DSP effects to be steep.	Limited to 2 inputs and 2 outputs. No onboard DSP effects. Some users may find the software bundle lacking. Requires a USB-C port for optimal performance, which may not be available on all computers.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 4 Outputs	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	2 Preamps
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output (DC-Coupled) 2x RCA TS Unbalanced Line Output
Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.13 or Later (64-Bit Only) Windows 10 (64-Bit Only) 9.0.3 or Later	macOS 10.11 or Later Windows 7 or Later 9 or Later
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

The PreSonus Revelator io24 and the MOTU M2 are both high-quality audio interfaces designed for professional audio recording and production. The Revelator io24 features 2 inputs and 4 outputs, while the M2 offers 2 inputs and 2 outputs. This makes the Revelator io24 more versatile in terms of output options, suitable for users needing additional routing capabilities.Show More

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 4 Outputs	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	2 Preamps
Input Level Adjustment
1x Knob	2x Knob
Expansion Slots

The PreSonus Revelator io24 and the MOTU M2 are both high-quality audio interfaces designed for different user needs. The Revelator io24 offers a configuration of 2 inputs and 4 outputs, allowing for greater flexibility in routing audio signals, while the M2 is limited to 2 inputs and 2 outputs, which may suit simpler setups or less complex recording needs.Show More

Signal Processing
Pad

Gain/Trim Range
Mic Inputs: 60 dB Hi-Z Inputs: 50 dB	Mic Inputs: 0 dB to +60 dB Line/Hi-Z Inputs: 0 dB to +57 dB
High-Pass Filter
80 Hz
Solo/Mute
Mute per Master

The PreSonus Revelator io24 and the MOTU M2 are both excellent audio interfaces, but they have distinct features that cater to different user needs. Starting with the gain/trim range, the Revelator io24 offers a mic input gain of 60 dB and a Hi-Z input gain of 50 dB. In contrast, the MOTU M2 provides a more versatile range, with mic inputs adjustable from 0 dB to +60 dB and line/Hi-Z inputs from 0 dB to +57 dB. This makes the MOTU M2 a potentially better choice for users who require precise control over their input levels.Show More

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output (DC-Coupled) 2x RCA TS Unbalanced Line Output
Phantom Power
48 V, Selectable On/Off (Selectable on Individual Inputs)	48 V, Selectable On/Off (Selectable on Individual Inputs)
Digital Audio I/O

Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0	USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)

Sync I/O

Network I/O

MIDI I/O
1x DIN 5-Pin Input 1x DIN 5-Pin Output	1x DIN 5-Pin Input 1x DIN 5-Pin Output

When comparing the PreSonus Revelator io24 and the MOTU M2 audio interfaces, both devices offer a similar array of features tailored for musicians and audio professionals. Both interfaces are equipped with two combo XLR-1/4" TRS inputs that support balanced/unbalanced mic/line/Hi-Z connections. This feature is essential for recording vocals and instruments with high fidelity. Additionally, they both include a 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output, allowing for easy monitoring during recording sessions.Show More

Performance
Frequency Response
Mic, Hi-Z Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz +0.1/-0.3 dB (Unity Gain) Monitor Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz +0.1/-0.3 dB (Unity Gain) Headphone Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz +0.1/-0.5 dB	Mic Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz +0/-0.1 dB Line, Hi-Z Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.15 dB Line Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz +0/-0.1 dB
Maximum Input Level
Mic/Hi-Z Inputs: +10 dBu (Min Gain)	Mic Inputs: +10 dBu (Min Gain) Line/Hi-Z Inputs: +16 dBu (Min Gain)
Maximum Output Level
Monitor Outputs: +10 dBu (Balanced, 1 kHz)	Line Outputs: +16 dBu (Balanced) Line Outputs: +9.5 dBu (Unbalanced) Headphone Outputs: +12.5 dBu
Impedance
Mic Inputs: 1.4 Kilohms (Balanced) Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohm Headphone Outputs: 32 to 300 Ohms	Mic Inputs: 2.65 Kilohms Line Inputs: 2 Megohms Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohm Line Outputs: 100 Ohms
Dynamic Range
AD/DA Converters: 105 dB	Mic Inputs: 115 dBA Line/Hi-Z Inputs: 114 dBA 1/4" Line/Monitor Outputs: 120 dBA RCA Line Outputs: 119 dBA Headphone Outputs: 115 dBA
THD+N
Mic Inputs: 0.009% (1 kHz, Min Gain, at -1 dBFS) Monitor Outputs: 0.003% (1 kHz, Unity Gain, at -1 dBFS) Headphone Outputs: 0.01% (1 kHz, at 0 dBFS)	Mic Inputs: < -97 dB / < 0.0014% Line/Hi-Z Inputs: < -100 dB / < 0.001% 1/4" Line/Monitor Outputs: < -110 dB / < 0.00032% RCA Line Outputs: < -105 dB / < 0.00056% Headphone Outputs: < -110 dB / < 0.0003%
EIN
Mic Inputs: -126 dBu A-Weighted (150-Ohm Source, Max Gain)	Mic Inputs: -129 dB A-Weighted (150-Ohm Source, Max Gain)

The PreSonus Revelator io24 and the MOTU M2 are both high-quality audio interfaces, but they differ in several key specifications. The frequency response for the Revelator io24's mic and Hi-Z inputs is 20 Hz to 20 kHz with a variation of +0.1/-0.3 dB at unity gain, while the M2 provides a tighter specification of 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.1 dB for mic inputs. The Revelator io24's headphone outputs exhibit a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz +0.1/-0.5 dB, compared to the M2's headphone output response of 12.5 dBu.Show More

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 kHz	Up to 192 kHz
Sample Rate Conversion

Bit Depths
24-Bit	24-Bit
Latency
Zero-Latency Direct Monitoring	Zero-Latency Direct Monitoring2.5 ms at 96 kHz (Dependent on Buffer Size, Input to Output)
Sync Sources
Internal	Internal

The PreSonus Revelator io24 Desktop 2x4 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface supports sample rates of 44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 kHz, which offers a decent range for most recording applications. It features a bit depth of 24-Bit, ensuring high-quality audio capture. However, it does not provide sample rate conversion. The device is designed for zero-latency direct monitoring, allowing users to listen to their input signals in real-time without delay. The sync sources are internal, making it suitable for straightforward recording setups.Show More

Audio Storage & Playback
Memory Card Slot

The PreSonus Revelator io24 and the MOTU M2 are both high-quality audio interfaces designed to cater to the needs of musicians and producers, but they come with distinct features and specifications that could influence a buyer's decision. Notably, both interfaces lack a memory card slot, which means users will need to rely on external storage solutions or their computer for recording and playback.Show More

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.13 or Later (64-Bit Only) Windows 10 (64-Bit Only) 9.0.3 or Later	macOS 10.11 or Later Windows 7 or Later 9 or Later
Processor Requirement
Mac: Intel Core i3 or Better PC: Intel Core i3 or Better AMD A10 or Better	Mac: 1 GHz Intel PC: 1 GHz Intel Pentium
RAM Requirements
4 GB, 8 GB Recommended	2 GB, 4 GB Recommended
Required Hardware
Available USB 2.0 Port or USB-C Port USB Cable (Included)	Available USB 2.0 Port USB Cable (Included)
Internet Connection
Required for Registration, Software/Driver Download	Required for Software/Driver Download

The PreSonus Revelator io24 and the MOTU M2 are both advanced audio interfaces designed for professional audio recording and production. In terms of OS compatibility, the Revelator io24 supports macOS 10.13 or later and Windows 10 (64-Bit Only), while the M2 is compatible with macOS 10.11 or later and Windows 7 or later. This gives the Revelator a slight advantage in supporting newer versions of macOS, but the M2 offers broader compatibility with older Windows systems.Show More

Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

The PreSonus Revelator io24 and the MOTU M2 are both compact audio interfaces that offer USB bus power, making them convenient for mobile recording and studio setups. With this feature, users can easily connect the interfaces to their computers without the need for an external power source. This is particularly advantageous for musicians and podcasters who require portability and flexibility in their recording environments.Show More

Physical
Anti-Theft Features
Kensington Security Slot	Kensington Security Slot
Dimensions
6.25 x 6.25 x 2.5" / 15.88 x 15.88 x 6.3 cm	7.5 x 4.25 x 1.75" / 19.1 x 10.79 x 4.45 cm (Chassis Only)
Weight
2.0 lb / 0.9 kg	1.4 lb / 0.6 kg

The PreSonus Revelator io24 and the MOTU M2 audio interfaces both feature Kensington Security Slots, providing users with a means to secure their devices against theft. This feature is essential for professionals who frequently move their audio interfaces between studios or live events. Both models ensure that your investment is protected while maintaining high-quality audio performance.Show More

Packaging Info
Package Weight
2.41 lb	1.8 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
8.5 x 8.4 x 5.2"	10 x 7.45 x 2.75"

The PreSonus Revelator io24 is a compact and versatile 2x4 USB Type-C audio/MIDI interface, designed for desktop use. It has a package weight of 2.41 lb and dimensions of 8.5 x 8.4 x 5.2 inches. This makes it slightly heavier and bulkier compared to its competitor, yet it offers a robust build suitable for various recording environments.Show More