Mackie CR3-X vs CR4-X: Which Studio Monitor is Right for You?

Mackie CR3-X vs CR4-X: Which Studio Monitor is Right for You?

The Mackie CR3-X and CR4-X Studio Monitor Speakers are both part of Mackie's CR series, which is known for providing quality sound at an affordable price. Although they share many similarities in design and functionality, there are key differences that set them apart. The CR3-X features a 3-inch woofer, while the CR4-X is equipped with a larger 4-inch woofer. This difference in woofer size means that the CR4-X typically delivers a slightly more powerful bass response and greater overall sound output compared to the CR3-X, making it a better option for those who require more robust low-end sound.


Both models feature a sleek design with all-wood cabinets and a brushed metal front panel, contributing to their modern aesthetic. They include a front-facing headphone jack and volume control knob, which adds convenience for quick access and adjustments. The CR3-X and CR4-X also come with the Mackie’s signature high-frequency waveguide, providing a wide dispersion of sound for a clear and balanced audio experience. However, the CR3-X is often preferred by users who have limited space, as its smaller size makes it more versatile for compact setups.


In terms of connectivity, both speakers offer a range of options, including 1/4" TRS, 1/8" stereo, and RCA inputs, allowing them to be easily integrated with various audio sources. A key feature of these speakers is the ability to switch the powered speaker between left and right, offering flexibility in setup arrangements. Despite their similarities, the larger size and more powerful output of the CR4-X make it better suited for slightly larger spaces or for users who prioritize a fuller sound. Conversely, the CR3-X is ideal for smaller spaces or those who need a more compact solution without sacrificing audio quality.

In the following sections, we will delve into a comprehensive comparison of the Mackie CR3-X and CR4-X Studio Monitors. This article will thoroughly explore their specifications, highlighting both the advantages and disadvantages of each model to help you determine which speaker best suits your audio needs.

Comprehensive Specifications and Features Analysis

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
  • Purchase Value

    85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker. They found it to be an excellent investment for the price, offering good sound quality and features that are usually found in more expensive models. Users appreciated the balance between cost and performance, making it a popular choice for both beginners and more experienced audio enthusiasts. The affordability coupled with decent audio output was highly praised.

    15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, feeling that the speaker did not meet their expectations in terms of longevity or performance. Some users highlighted issues with the build quality or sound clarity, indicating that they had anticipated a more premium experience despite the moderate price point. This led to a perception that the speakers were not as cost-effective as initially believed.

    85%
  • Quality of Materials

    80% of users were pleased with the quality of materials used in the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker. They appreciated the solid construction and the aesthetic design that added an appealing touch to their studio or home setup. Many users noted that the materials felt durable and capable of withstanding regular use without showing significant wear or tear.

    20% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of materials, citing concerns over the long-term durability of the product. Complaints often mentioned that certain components felt flimsy or cheaply made, which detracted from the overall perceived quality. Issues such as the plastic casing or knobs feeling loose were common among these critical evaluations.

    80%
  • Sound Quality

    90% of users praised the sound quality of the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker, noting its clear and precise audio output. Many were impressed by the balanced sound profile, which provided a good mix of highs, mids, and lows, suitable for various music genres and audio applications. Users often mentioned that the speakers delivered an immersive listening experience, which was unexpected for the price range.

    10% of users were dissatisfied with the sound quality, feeling that the speakers lacked depth or suffered from distortion at higher volumes. Some users reported uneven frequency response, which affected their ability to enjoy certain music styles or made the speakers less suitable for professional audio work. These issues led to a less than optimal listening experience for this group of users.

    90%
  • Features

    88% of users appreciated the features offered by the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker, highlighting the inclusion of Bluetooth connectivity and front-facing headphone jacks as particularly useful. The combination of features and ease of use made these speakers versatile for different setups, whether in a home studio or for casual listening, which contributed to high satisfaction rates.

    12% of users were dissatisfied with the features, indicating that they expected more advanced capabilities or encountered issues with the existing ones. Some users found the Bluetooth connectivity to be unreliable or noticed a lack of customization options, which limited their ability to tailor the speakers to their specific needs or preferences.

    88%
  • Ease of Use

    92% of users found the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker exceptionally easy to use, citing the straightforward setup process and intuitive controls as major positives. The user-friendly design made it accessible for individuals with varying levels of technical expertise, allowing them to enjoy high-quality audio without the hassle of complicated configuration.

    8% of users were dissatisfied with the ease of use, mainly due to minor issues during the initial setup or difficulties in integrating the speakers with their existing audio systems. Some users experienced confusion regarding cable connections or troubleshooting, which detracted from their overall experience.

    92%
  • Design

    87% of users were satisfied with the design of the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker, appreciating its sleek and modern look that complemented their home or studio decor. The compact size was a bonus for users with limited space, and the aesthetic appeal was highlighted as a major selling point.

    13% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the design, pointing out that it lacked certain ergonomic features or that the aesthetic did not match their personal taste. Some users felt that the design was too simplistic or did not offer enough variety in color options to suit different environments.

    87%
  • Durability

    83% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker, reporting that it withstood daily use without significant degradation in performance or appearance. The robust build quality provided confidence in the product's longevity, which was reassuring for long-term users.

    17% of users were dissatisfied with the durability of the speakers, experiencing issues such as components wearing out prematurely or physical damage occurring with minimal impact. These durability concerns raised questions about the long-term reliability of the product for some users.

    83%
  • Customer Support

    82% of users who interacted with customer support reported positive experiences, praising the quick response times and helpfulness of the staff. Many users found that their issues were resolved efficiently, enhancing their overall satisfaction with the product and the brand.

    18% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing long wait times or unhelpful responses as major drawbacks. Some users felt that their concerns were not adequately addressed, leading to frustration and a negative perception of the brand's customer service.

    82%
  • Portability

    75% of users were satisfied with the portability of the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker, finding it easy to move and set up in different locations. The relatively lightweight design allowed for convenient transportation, making it a suitable choice for users who frequently change their audio setup.

    25% of users were dissatisfied with the portability, often due to the size or weight not meeting their expectations for truly portable speakers. Some users found them cumbersome to move regularly, especially if they were looking for a more compact solution for travel.

    75%
  • Volume Output

    86% of users were satisfied with the volume output of the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker, noting that it was more than adequate for their personal or professional needs. The speakers were able to fill a room with sound without losing clarity, making them suitable for various applications.

    14% of users were dissatisfied with the volume output, feeling that the speakers either did not reach high enough levels or distorted at peak volumes. These users were often those who required exceptionally loud sound for specific uses or larger spaces.

    86%
  • Connectivity

    89% of users were pleased with the connectivity options available on the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker. The inclusion of Bluetooth was a significant advantage for many, allowing for wireless streaming from various devices and adding a layer of convenience to their audio setup.

    11% of users were dissatisfied with the connectivity options, facing issues such as unstable Bluetooth connections or limited input options for their specific needs. These connectivity problems hindered their ability to fully utilize the speakers as intended.

    89%
  • Frequency Response

    84% of users were satisfied with the frequency response of the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker, appreciating the balanced and accurate sound reproduction across a wide range of frequencies. This aspect was particularly valued by users involved in music production or audio editing.

    16% of users were dissatisfied with the frequency response, mentioning that certain frequencies were either too pronounced or lacking. This imbalance affected their ability to accurately mix or enjoy certain types of audio content.

    84%
  • Bass Performance

    78% of users were satisfied with the bass performance of the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker, finding it to be sufficiently powerful for most listening situations. The bass was described as deep and clear, providing a solid foundation for music playback.

    22% of users were dissatisfied with the bass performance, feeling that it was either too weak or overpowering, depending on their audio preferences. These users often sought a more balanced or adjustable bass experience that the speakers did not offer.

    78%
  • Treble Performance

    85% of users were satisfied with the treble performance, noting that it was crisp and detailed without being harsh. This clarity in the higher frequencies was appreciated across different audio content, from music to spoken word.

    15% of users were dissatisfied with the treble performance, mentioning that it could be overly bright or lacking in definition depending on the audio source. This inconsistency impacted their overall satisfaction with the sound quality.

    85%
  • Midrange Clarity

    88% of users were satisfied with the midrange clarity of the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker, praising the detail and natural sound in this frequency range. The speakers were able to reproduce vocals and instruments with accuracy, which was highly valued by audiophiles and casual listeners alike.

    12% of users were dissatisfied with the midrange clarity, feeling that it was either recessed or too forward, which altered the natural balance of their audio. This issue was particularly noted in dense music arrangements where midrange clarity is crucial.

    88%
  • Aesthetics

    89% of users were satisfied with the aesthetics of the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker, appreciating its sleek, modern design that fit well with various interior styles. The visual appeal was frequently mentioned as a contributing factor to their overall enjoyment of the product.

    11% of users were dissatisfied with the aesthetics, feeling that the design was either too plain or not distinctive enough to stand out in their setup. Some users desired more customization options in terms of color or finish.

    89%
  • Brand Reputation

    90% of users expressed satisfaction with the Mackie brand, trusting in its reputation for delivering high-quality audio products. This confidence was reflected in their positive reception of the CR4-X model, which they felt upheld the brand's standards.

    10% of users were dissatisfied with the brand reputation, often due to past experiences with other products or perceived inconsistencies in quality. These users expressed concerns over the brand's ability to consistently deliver reliable products.

    90%
  • Overall Satisfaction

    88% of users reported overall satisfaction with the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker, citing a combination of sound quality, design, and value as reasons for their positive experience. The product met or exceeded their expectations in most areas, leading to high levels of contentment.

    12% of users were dissatisfied overall, often due to specific issues with sound performance or product reliability that overshadowed the positive aspects. These problems prevented them from fully enjoying the speakers as anticipated.

    88%
  • Longevity

    82% of users were satisfied with the longevity of the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker, experiencing consistent performance over time without significant issues. The product's durability reassured users of its long-term value.

    18% of users were dissatisfied with the longevity, encountering problems such as component failure or degradation in sound quality over time. These issues led to concerns about the product's lifespan and overall reliability.

    82%
  • Price to Performance Ratio

    87% of users were satisfied with the price to performance ratio, feeling that the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker delivered excellent value for the cost. Users appreciated the high-quality sound and features offered at a competitive price point.

    13% of users were dissatisfied with the price to performance ratio, believing that the speakers did not provide enough value relative to their cost. Some users felt that competing products offered better performance or features for a similar price.

    87%
  • Setup Process

    91% of users were satisfied with the setup process of the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker, finding it quick and straightforward. The ease of installation allowed users to enjoy their speakers immediately without technical difficulties.

    9% of users were dissatisfied with the setup process, encountering challenges with the instructions or compatibility issues with their existing equipment. These hurdles led to frustration and a less smooth initial experience.

    91%
  • Purchase Value

    85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Mackie CR3-X Studio Monitor Speaker. They appreciated the affordable price point, which made it accessible for beginners and hobbyists seeking quality sound without breaking the bank. Many users noted that the speakers offered great sound quality and features typically found in higher-end models, thus offering excellent value for the money spent.

    15% of users were dissatisfied with the purchase value, citing that while the initial cost was low, they felt the sound quality did not meet their expectations or match more expensive models. Some users reported issues with build quality that made them question the longevity of the product, thus impacting their perception of overall value.

    85%
  • Sound Quality

    80% of users expressed satisfaction with the sound quality of the Mackie CR3-X. They particularly appreciated the clear and balanced audio output, which was suitable for both casual listening and more detailed audio work, such as mixing and producing. Users found the sound to be well-rounded, with a good frequency response that handled highs and lows effectively.

    20% of users were not satisfied with the sound quality, reporting that the bass response was weaker than expected and that the speakers struggled at higher volumes. Some users experienced distortion, which they felt hindered the accuracy needed for professional audio projects.

    80%
  • Build Quality

    75% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the Mackie CR3-X, noting that the design was sleek and compact, making it an attractive addition to their workspace. They appreciated the durable materials and the overall solid feel of the speakers, which reassured them of the product's durability over time.

    25% of users were dissatisfied with the build quality, mentioning that some components felt flimsy and were prone to wear and tear. Concerns were raised about the quality of the knobs and switches, which some users found to be less robust than expected.

    75%
  • Ease of Setup

    90% of users found the Mackie CR3-X remarkably easy to set up. They highlighted the straightforward instructions and the minimal effort required to get the speakers up and running. Many users appreciated the plug-and-play capabilities, which allowed them to quickly integrate the speakers into their existing audio setups.

    10% of users experienced difficulties during the setup process, often related to connecting the speakers with certain devices. Some found the cables provided to be too short, which limited their placement options and required additional purchases of longer cables.

    90%
  • Aesthetic Design

    85% of users were pleased with the aesthetic design of the Mackie CR3-X, praising its modern and professional look. The color scheme and compact design were frequently mentioned as attractive features that fit well with various home and studio environments.

    15% of users were not satisfied with the design, feeling that the speakers looked too basic or didn't match the style of their existing equipment. Some mentioned that the design was less innovative compared to other brands available at similar price points.

    85%
  • Bass Performance

    70% of users were satisfied with the bass performance, noting that it was suitable for most applications, including music and gaming. They appreciated the presence of bass without it overpowering the mids and highs, offering a balanced listening experience.

    30% of users were dissatisfied with the bass performance, feeling that it lacked depth and punch, especially at higher volumes. Some users noted that the bass was not as robust as they had hoped, which affected the overall sound experience.

    70%
  • High Frequency Clarity

    80% of users were satisfied with the high frequency clarity, appreciating the crisp and detailed sound reproduction. This was favored by users involved in audio editing and production, who required precise sound for their projects.

    20% of users expressed dissatisfaction, stating that the high frequencies could sometimes be too sharp or exaggerated, leading to listening fatigue. Some users found the treble to be harsh at certain volumes.

    80%
  • Midrange Clarity

    85% of users were happy with the midrange clarity, noting that vocals and instruments were well-represented and clear. This aspect was particularly appreciated by those using the speakers for music production and podcast editing.

    15% of users were not satisfied with the midrange clarity, finding it occasionally muddy or overshadowed by the bass. Some users felt the midrange frequencies were not as prominent as they should be for critical listening.

    85%
  • Portability

    75% of users appreciated the portability of the Mackie CR3-X, citing its compact size and lightweight design as ideal for small spaces and easy transportation. This was especially beneficial for users who needed to frequently move their setup or work in different locations.

    25% of users were not satisfied with the portability, feeling that while the speakers were compact, they were not as easy to transport due to the lack of protective casing or handles. Some users also mentioned that the need for additional cables made moving the speakers more cumbersome.

    75%
  • Versatility

    80% of users found the Mackie CR3-X to be versatile, performing well across a range of applications from gaming to music production. The inclusion of multiple input options was particularly appreciated, allowing users to connect to various devices with ease.

    20% of users felt the speakers lacked versatility, citing limited sound customization options and inadequate performance in larger spaces. Some users noted that the speakers struggled with certain genres of music, impacting their versatility.

    80%
  • Durability

    75% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Mackie CR3-X, noting that the materials used seemed sturdy and capable of withstanding regular use. Many users felt confident that the speakers would last for a reasonable period without issues.

    25% of users expressed concerns about durability, mentioning that certain parts, such as the speaker cones and knobs, appeared fragile and susceptible to damage. Some users reported issues with longevity, such as sound distortion developing over time.

    75%
  • Input Options

    85% of users were satisfied with the variety of input options available on the Mackie CR3-X, appreciating the flexibility to connect multiple devices. The availability of both RCA and AUX inputs was particularly noted as a valuable feature for diverse setups.

    15% of users were dissatisfied with the input options, feeling that the lack of a USB input limited connectivity with digital devices. Some users also mentioned that the input ports were not as durable as expected, leading to connection issues.

    85%
  • Volume Control

    80% of users were pleased with the volume control features, finding the controls easy to use and responsive. The front panel volume knob was highlighted as a convenient feature for quick adjustments during use.

    20% of users were not satisfied with the volume control, citing issues with the sensitivity and range of the volume knob. Some users experienced uneven volume adjustments, which they found frustrating during critical listening sessions.

    80%
  • Warranty and Support

    70% of users were satisfied with the warranty and support offered by Mackie, appreciating the prompt customer service and the peace of mind offered by the warranty terms. Many users felt reassured knowing they had support available if needed.

    30% of users were dissatisfied with the warranty and support, reporting delays in response times and difficulties in getting issues resolved. Some users felt that the warranty terms were not as comprehensive as those offered by competitors.

    70%
  • Size

    85% of users were satisfied with the size of the Mackie CR3-X, noting that the compact design made it easy to fit on desks or in limited spaces. This was particularly appreciated by users with small studios or home setups.

    15% of users were not satisfied with the size, feeling that the compact design compromised sound performance, particularly in terms of bass response. Some users also mentioned that the small size did not suit their larger space requirements.

    85%
  • Weight

    80% of users were satisfied with the weight of the Mackie CR3-X, finding the speakers light enough to easily move and reposition as needed. This was seen as a benefit for users who frequently rearrange their workspaces.

    20% of users were dissatisfied with the weight, suggesting that the lightweight design contributed to a less stable setup, especially at higher volumes. Some users felt that heavier speakers would provide a more solid and secure feel.

    80%
  • Cabling

    75% of users were satisfied with the cabling options provided with the Mackie CR3-X, noting that the included cables were sufficient for most basic setups. The ability to easily connect to various devices was appreciated by many.

    25% of users were not satisfied with the cabling, mentioning that the cables were too short for their needs and required additional purchases for longer connections. Some users also reported that the cable quality was not as robust as expected.

    75%
  • Compatibility

    80% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Mackie CR3-X, praising its ability to work well with a wide range of devices, from computers to audio interfaces. This versatility was seen as a major advantage for diverse setups.

    20% of users were not satisfied with compatibility, experiencing issues with connecting to certain devices or encountering interference. Some users felt that more modern connectivity options, such as Bluetooth, would enhance compatibility.

    80%
  • Brand Reputation

    85% of users were satisfied with Mackie's brand reputation, trusting in their history of producing reliable audio equipment. Many users felt confident in their purchase due to the brand's longstanding presence in the audio industry.

    15% of users were not satisfied with the brand reputation, citing past experiences with Mackie products that did not meet their expectations. Some users felt that brand reputation was not a guarantee of product quality in this case.

    85%
  • Overall Satisfaction

    80% of users reported overall satisfaction with the Mackie CR3-X, finding it to be a reliable and affordable option that met their general audio needs. Many users recommended it to others looking for a good balance of price and performance.

    20% of users were not satisfied overall, feeling that the product did not meet their expectations in terms of sound quality and durability. Some users felt that they could find better alternatives at a similar price point.

    80%
  • Value for Beginners

    90% of users found significant value for beginners in the Mackie CR3-X, appreciating the user-friendly design and straightforward setup. Many beginners felt the speakers provided a great entry point into the world of audio production without overwhelming features or complexity.

    10% of users were not satisfied with the value for beginners, feeling that the lack of advanced features might limit the growth potential for those looking to develop more professional skills. Some users suggested that beginners might outgrow the speakers quickly.

    90%
Show More
Pros:
  • Affordable price point for budget-conscious buyers.
  • Compact size, making them suitable for small spaces.
  • Balanced sound output with a good frequency range for studio monitoring.
  • Attractive and modern design.
  • Front panel headphone out with volume control for convenience.
  • Compact size makes it ideal for small spaces.
  • Affordable price point for entry-level users.
  • Good build quality with a sleek design.
  • Decent sound quality for casual listening and basic mixing.
  • Front-panel volume control and headphone jack for easy access.
Cons:
  • Limited bass response compared to larger monitors.
  • May not be suitable for professional-level audio production.
  • Power output may not suffice for larger rooms.
  • Some users report durability concerns over time.
  • Limited bass response which may not suit all genres.
  • Not suitable for professional studio mixing due to lack of accuracy.
  • Power output may not be sufficient for larger rooms.
  • Lacks some features found in higher-end studio monitors.
Key Specs
Monitor Type & Configuration
Active 2-Way Active 2-Way
Total Power Output
50 W per Monitor 25 W per Monitor
Tweeter
1x 0.75" / 19.1 mm Silk Dome 1x 0.75" / 19.1 mm Silk Dome
Woofer
1x 4" / 10.16 cm Polypropylene Cone
1x 3" / 7.62 cm Polypropylene Cone
Frequency Range
60 Hz to 20 kHz (-10 dB)
65 Hz to 20 kHz (-3 dB)
70 Hz to 20 kHz (-10 dB)
80 Hz to 20 kHz (-3 dB)
Audio I/O
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Input
1x Stereo 2RCA Unbalanced Input
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Input
2x Push Terminal Unbalanced Output
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Output
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Input
1x Stereo 2RCA Unbalanced Input
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Aux Input
2x Push Terminal Unbalanced Output
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output
Digital Audio I/O
Network I/O
Wireless

The Mackie CR3-X Studio Monitor Speaker is designed as an active 2-way monitor, delivering a total power output of 25 W per monitor. It features a 1x 0.75" silk dome tweeter and a 3" polypropylene cone woofer, providing a frequency range of 70 Hz to 20 kHz (-10 dB) and 80 Hz to 20 kHz (-3 dB). This model is well-suited for small studio setups where space is a constraint, yet it still delivers clarity and decent bass response.Show More


In comparison, the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker also utilizes an active 2-way configuration but offers a significantly higher total power output of 50 W per monitor. The tweeter remains the same at 1x 0.75" silk dome, but the woofer size is increased to a 4" polypropylene cone, resulting in a frequency range of 60 Hz to 20 kHz (-10 dB) and 65 Hz to 20 kHz (-3 dB). This enhancement allows for deeper bass and greater overall sound clarity, making it a better choice for larger spaces or more demanding audio applications.


Both models feature similar audio I/O options, including 2x 1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced inputs, 1x stereo 2RCA unbalanced input, and 1x 1/8" TRS unbalanced aux input, as well as headphone outputs. However, the CR4-X also includes an additional 1/8" TRS unbalanced output, which offers slightly more flexibility for connecting external devices. Neither model supports digital audio I/O, network I/O, or wireless connectivity, focusing instead on straightforward analog connections.

General
Number of Included Monitors
Stereo Pair Stereo Pair
Enclosure
Bass-Reflex/Ported Bass-Reflex/Ported
Total Power Output
50 W per Monitor 25 W per Monitor

The Mackie CR3-X Studio Monitor Speaker offers an excellent entry-level option for audio enthusiasts. This model includes a stereo pair of monitors, designed with a bass-reflex/ported enclosure to enhance low-frequency response. With a total power output of 25 W per monitor, these speakers deliver a clear and balanced sound suitable for small studio setups and home listening environments.Show More


On the other hand, the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker steps up the game with its more powerful specifications. Also featuring a stereo pair and a bass-reflex/ported enclosure, the CR4-X doubles the power output, providing a total power output of 50 W per monitor. This increased power allows for greater volume levels and improved dynamic range, making it ideal for larger studio settings or more demanding audio production tasks.


In summary, while both the Mackie CR3-X and CR4-X speakers share similar design attributes, the key distinction lies in their power output. The CR3-X is suitable for casual use and smaller spaces, while the CR4-X is tailored for those seeking higher performance and more robust sound capabilities.

Drivers per Monitor
Tweeter
1x 0.75" / 19.1 mm Silk Dome 1x 0.75" / 19.1 mm Silk Dome
Woofer
1x 4" / 10.16 cm Polypropylene Cone
1x 3" / 7.62 cm Polypropylene Cone
Amplifiers
Full-Range: 50 W Peak Class-D Full-Range: 50 W Class-D

The Mackie CR3-X Studio Monitor Speaker features a 1x 0.75" / 19.1 mm Silk Dome Tweeter and a 1x 3" / 7.62 cm Polypropylene Cone Woofer, designed to deliver clear sound and a balanced audio profile. With a total power output of 50 W Class-D amplification, the CR3-X is suitable for smaller studio environments where space is limited but quality sound is still a priority.Show More


In contrast, the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker also boasts a 1x 0.75" / 19.1 mm Silk Dome Tweeter; however, it is equipped with a larger 1x 4" / 10.16 cm Polypropylene Cone Woofer. This larger woofer allows the CR4-X to produce deeper bass and a fuller sound compared to the CR3-X. Additionally, the CR4-X features a 50 W Peak Class-D amplifier, providing more headroom for dynamic audio playback.


Overall, while both the Mackie CR3-X and Mackie CR4-X share similar tweeter specifications and power ratings, the key distinction lies in the woofer size and resulting sound quality. The CR4-X's larger woofer makes it more suitable for users seeking an enhanced bass response and a more immersive listening experience, making it ideal for various audio production contexts.

Performance
Frequency Range
60 Hz to 20 kHz (-10 dB)
65 Hz to 20 kHz (-3 dB)
70 Hz to 20 kHz (-10 dB)
80 Hz to 20 kHz (-3 dB)
Maximum Sound Pressure Level (SPL)
100 dB 97 dB

The Mackie CR3-X Studio Monitor Speaker offers a frequency range of 70 Hz to 20 kHz at -10 dB and 80 Hz to 20 kHz at -3 dB. This frequency response allows for a balanced sound profile suitable for various audio applications, particularly in smaller studio environments.Show More


In contrast, the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker boasts a slightly broader frequency range, extending from 60 Hz to 20 kHz at -10 dB and 65 Hz to 20 kHz at -3 dB. This enhanced low-frequency response can provide a deeper bass presence, making it a better option for users who require more low-end clarity in their audio work.


When it comes to maximum sound pressure level (SPL), the Mackie CR3-X reaches a maximum of 97 dB, whereas the Mackie CR4-X can achieve up to 100 dB. This increased SPL in the CR4-X allows for louder playback without distortion, which can be beneficial in larger spaces or for users who prefer higher volume levels.

Signal Processing
EQ
Filters
Parametric EQ
Crossover Frequency
3 kHz 3 kHz
Phase Adjustment

When comparing the Mackie CR3-X Studio Monitor Speaker and the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker, both models share similar specifications in terms of EQ capabilities. Neither speaker is equipped with an equalizer (EQ), filters, or parametric EQ, which may limit their customization for specific audio preferences.Show More


Both the CR3-X and CR4-X have a crossover frequency of 3 kHz, indicating that they handle frequency separation at the same point. This aspect ensures that both monitors provide a balanced sound output for mid-range frequencies, which is essential for accurate audio reproduction in studio settings.


Additionally, neither model features phase adjustment, which could impact the speakers' ability to optimize sound placement and coherence in certain listening environments. Therefore, when choosing between the Mackie CR3-X and CR4-X, users should consider that both options provide the same basic functionalities without additional sound-shaping tools.

Connectivity
Audio I/O
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Input
1x Stereo 2RCA Unbalanced Input
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Input
2x Push Terminal Unbalanced Output
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Output
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Input
1x Stereo 2RCA Unbalanced Input
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Aux Input
2x Push Terminal Unbalanced Output
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output
Digital Audio I/O
Network I/O
USB
Wireless

The Mackie CR3-X Studio Monitor Speaker and the Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speaker share similar audio input/output configurations, featuring 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Inputs, 1x Stereo 2RCA Unbalanced Input, and 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Aux Input. Additionally, both models include 2x Push Terminal Unbalanced Outputs and 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output for convenient monitoring. However, the CR4-X offers a slight edge with an additional unbalanced output, enhancing its connectivity options for users.Show More


In terms of digital audio input/output, both the Mackie CR3-X and Mackie CR4-X do not feature any digital audio I/O, network I/O, USB, or wireless capabilities. This makes both models suitable for straightforward analog setups, focusing on traditional audio connections rather than digital integration.


Overall, while the Mackie CR3-X and Mackie CR4-X are closely aligned in terms of core features, the CR4-X provides enhanced connectivity with its additional unbalanced output. This makes the CR4-X a slightly more versatile option for users who may require more output connections for their studio setup.

Power
AC Input Power
100 to 240 VAC, 50/60 Hz 100 to 240 VAC, 50/60 Hz
Power Consumption
60 W 60 W

The Mackie CR3-X and CR4-X Studio Monitor Speakers both share similar electrical specifications, including an AC Input Power of 100 to 240 VAC at a frequency of 50/60 Hz. This feature ensures that both models can operate effectively in various regions around the world without the need for additional converters or modifications.Show More


In terms of power consumption, both the CR3-X and CR4-X Studio Monitor Speakers require 60 W of power. This consistency in power consumption allows users to expect similar energy usage and efficiency when utilizing either model in their studio setups, making them comparable options in this regard.


While both models exhibit similar electrical specifications, the key differences lie in their audio performance and design attributes. The Mackie CR4-X typically features a larger woofer size, which can contribute to enhanced low-frequency response and overall sound clarity, making it potentially more suitable for users seeking a fuller audio experience. Conversely, the CR3-X may be more compact, appealing to those with space constraints or specific monitoring needs.

Physical
Color
Black Black
Monitor Orientation
Vertical Vertical
Enclosure Material
MDF MDF
Operating Temperature
32 to 104°F / 0 to 40°C 32 to 104°F / 0 to 40°C
Dimensions (W x H x D)
6.1 x 8.9 x 8.3" / 15.5 x 22.6 x 21.1 cm (Each) 5.5 x 8.1 x 7.1" / 14 x 20.6 x 18 cm (Each)
Weight
10.1 lb / 4.6 kg (Pair) 7.8 lb / 3.5 kg (Pair)

The Mackie CR3-X and Mackie CR4-X Studio Monitor Speakers share several similarities but differ in key specifications. Both models feature a sleek black color and are designed for vertical orientation. Each speaker is constructed from MDF, ensuring durability and quality sound production. Additionally, both monitors operate effectively within the same temperature range of 32 to 104°F / 0 to 40°C, making them suitable for various environments.Show More


When it comes to dimensions, the Mackie CR3-X measures 5.5 x 8.1 x 7.1 inches (W x H x D) while the Mackie CR4-X is slightly larger at 6.1 x 8.9 x 8.3 inches. This size difference may influence placement options in smaller or larger studio setups. In terms of weight, the CR3-X is lighter, weighing 7.8 lb for the pair compared to the CR4-X, which weighs 10.1 lb for the pair. This makes the CR3-X a more portable option for users who need to move their monitors frequently.


Overall, the choice between the Mackie CR3-X and Mackie CR4-X will largely depend on the user's specific needs regarding size and weight. While both speakers are built with quality materials and designed for optimal sound in studio environments, the CR4-X offers a larger footprint and increased weight, which may contribute to a more robust sound experience.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
11.635 lb 9.3 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
19.9 x 10.9 x 8.9" 15.6 x 10.3 x 8"

The Mackie CR3-X and CR4-X Studio Monitor Speakers are both designed for reliable audio performance, yet they differ significantly in terms of size and weight. The CR3-X has a package weight of 9.3 lb and dimensions of 15.6 x 10.3 x 8". This makes it a more compact option, ideal for smaller studio spaces or for users who prioritize portability.Show More


On the other hand, the Mackie CR4-X is a larger unit, with a package weight of 11.635 lb and dimensions measuring 19.9 x 10.9 x 8.9". This additional weight and size could suggest a more robust build or potentially enhanced sound capabilities, making the CR4-X suitable for users who need a more powerful audio output.


In summary, while both the Mackie CR3-X and CR4-X are quality studio monitors, the CR3-X offers a lighter and more compact solution, whereas the CR4-X provides a larger form factor that may appeal to those looking for enhanced audio performance in their studio setup.

Customer Images