PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 vs Focusrite Scarlett Solo: A Detailed Comparison

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface are both popular choices for musicians and podcasters seeking high-quality audio interfaces, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation) is known for its premium build quality and excellent sound fidelity. It features a single mic preamp that delivers a clean and transparent sound, ideal for vocals and acoustic instruments. The interface supports USB-C connectivity, which is becoming the standard for modern devices, offering faster data transfer rates and improved power handling. The Scarlett Solo includes a high-headroom instrument input for guitars and basses and offers 24-bit/192kHz conversion, ensuring top-notch audio resolution. Additionally, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo comes with a suite of software, including Ableton Live Lite and the Focusrite Red Plug-in Suite, providing users with valuable tools for recording and mixing.
On the other hand, the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary Edition is a versatile and more robust option, featuring two combo inputs that accommodate both XLR and 1/4" connections, making it suitable for recording multiple sources simultaneously. It supports USB-B connectivity, which is widely compatible with both older and newer computers. The AudioBox USB 96 offers MIDI I/O, a feature not present in the Scarlett Solo, allowing users to connect MIDI keyboards and controllers. This interface also supports 24-bit/96kHz audio resolution, which is slightly lower than the Scarlett Solo but still provides professional-quality sound. The AudioBox USB 96 comes with Studio One Artist software, a powerful DAW that includes a variety of effects and virtual instruments, making it a comprehensive package for music production.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation) is ideal for solo artists and podcasters looking for pristine audio quality and modern connectivity options. Its single preamp and high-resolution conversion make it a great choice for high-fidelity recordings. Conversely, the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary Edition offers more flexibility with its dual inputs and MIDI support, making it better suited for musicians who need to record multiple sources or integrate MIDI devices. Both interfaces come with valuable software packages, but the choice ultimately depends on the specific needs and workflow preferences of the user.

Specifications, Advantages, and Disadvantages

PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary

Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation)

Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation)

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 85% of users praised the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 for its great value, noting that it offers a professional-grade audio interface at an affordable price point. Many users appreciated the combination of high-quality sound performance and the inclusion of Studio One Artist software, which enhances its value proposition. The interface is particularly favored by beginners and budget-conscious musicians who find it a cost-effective solution for home recording. 15% of users felt that the purchase value did not meet their expectations, often pointing out that there are other interfaces in a similar price range that offer additional features or slightly better sound quality. Some users were also dissatisfied with the bundled software, finding it not as user-friendly as expected. 85% Sound Quality 88% of users were satisfied with the sound quality of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, highlighting its clear and crisp audio output. Users found the preamps to provide clean amplification and appreciated the 24-bit, 96 kHz resolution, which delivers a professional sound experience. This aspect was particularly valued by podcasters and musicians who require high-quality audio capture. 12% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, citing issues such as occasional noise interference or a lack of warmth in the recordings. Some users noted that while the sound quality is good, it may not meet the expectations of professional-level audio engineers who require extremely high fidelity. 88% Build Quality 90% of users appreciated the build quality of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, describing it as robust and durable. The metal chassis and solid construction provide a sense of reliability and longevity, making it a preferred choice for those who frequently transport their equipment for live performances or mobile recordings. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the build quality, mainly due to minor issues such as the quality of the knobs or the durability of the USB connection. Some users felt that while the main body is sturdy, the controls could be more robust to withstand frequent handling. 90% Ease of Use 87% of users found the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 easy to use, highlighting its straightforward setup and user-friendly interface. The plug-and-play functionality was particularly praised by beginners and those new to audio recording, as it allowed them to start recording with minimal technical difficulties. 13% of users experienced challenges with ease of use, often related to software installation and driver compatibility. Some users reported initial setup issues, particularly on certain operating systems, leading to frustration among those expecting a smoother out-of-the-box experience. 87% Portability 92% of users were highly satisfied with the portability of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, thanks to its compact size and lightweight design. This makes it an excellent option for musicians and podcasters who need to record on the go, without compromising on audio quality. 8% of users were less satisfied with portability, mainly because they would have preferred a more compact design or additional protective features for transport. Some users also mentioned that the lack of a carrying case as standard was a minor inconvenience. 92% Compatibility 84% of users were pleased with the compatibility of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, noting its seamless integration with various DAWs and operating systems. The interface works well with both Mac and Windows platforms, which is a significant advantage for users who work across different systems. 16% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with older operating systems or certain DAW software that required additional configuration. Some users also experienced difficulties with driver updates, which occasionally led to functionality problems. 84% Latency 82% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, which is crucial for real-time monitoring and recording. Many users appreciated the responsive input/output, especially for live instrument tracking and vocal recordings. 18% of users reported issues with latency, particularly under specific settings or when using resource-intensive plugins. These users found that latency could interrupt their workflow, especially in complex recording sessions requiring precise timing. 82% Customer Support 78% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by PreSonus, appreciating the quick response times and helpfulness of the support staff. Many users found that their technical issues were resolved efficiently, contributing to a positive brand experience. 22% of users expressed dissatisfaction with customer support, citing delays in response times or unhelpful interactions. Some users felt that the support resources available online were limited and not comprehensive enough to solve more complex issues on their own. 78% Durability 89% of users found the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 to be highly durable, withstanding the rigors of frequent use without significant wear or damage. The sturdy metal casing was particularly appreciated for its ability to protect the internal components during transport and use. 11% of users were dissatisfied with the durability, often pointing to specific parts like the knobs or USB port that seemed prone to wear over time. Some users felt that while the main body was durable, these smaller components could be improved for greater longevity. 89% Aesthetic Design 86% of users liked the aesthetic design of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, commending its sleek and professional look. The design is often described as modern and functional, fitting well into studio setups both visually and practically. 14% of users were not satisfied with the design, feeling that it was too plain or lacked distinctive features. A few users mentioned that the interface's appearance could be further enhanced to match more premium studio equipment aesthetics. 86% Input/Output Options 80% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, noting that it provides essential connectivity for most basic recording needs. Users appreciated the dual combo inputs, which allow for versatile microphone and instrument connections. 20% of users felt that the input/output options were limited, particularly those who required more channels or additional connectivity for more complex studio setups. Some users expressed a desire for more advanced features like digital inputs or outputs. 80% Software Integration 83% of users were satisfied with the software integration of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, particularly the inclusion of Studio One Artist DAW, which is well-regarded for its functionality and ease of use. Users appreciated the seamless transition from hardware to software. 17% of users experienced issues with software integration, often struggling with installation or compatibility problems with other DAWs. Some users found the learning curve for Studio One Artist steeper than expected, which affected their overall satisfaction. 83% Driver Stability 79% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, noting that once installed, the drivers generally performed well and supported stable operation across different projects. 21% of users encountered issues with driver stability, reporting occasional crashes or disconnections. These issues were particularly frustrating for users in the middle of recording sessions and required troubleshooting or reinstalling drivers. 79% Overall Performance 84% of users rated the overall performance of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 positively, citing its reliable operation and quality sound output. Users appreciated the consistent results across various recording tasks, making it a trusted piece of equipment in their studios. 16% of users were not fully satisfied with the overall performance, often due to occasional technical issues or limitations in connectivity and features. Some users felt that while it performs well for basic tasks, it falls short for more advanced studio needs. 84% Flexibility 81% of users appreciated the flexibility of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, which allows for a range of recording applications from music production to podcasting. Users valued the ability to connect microphones and instruments easily, making it versatile for various projects. 19% of users found the flexibility limited, particularly when dealing with larger, more complex projects that required additional inputs or outputs. Some users wished for more routing options to accommodate different recording setups. 81% Power Supply 90% of users were satisfied with the power supply of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, which is powered via USB. Users appreciated the convenience of not needing an external power source, making it easy to use with laptops and portable setups. 10% of users expressed concerns about the USB power supply, noting that it could occasionally lead to power limitations, especially when using power-hungry condenser microphones. Some users suggested an optional external power supply for more demanding setups. 90% Learning Curve 83% of users found the learning curve to be manageable, especially with the intuitive design and straightforward controls of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96. Many beginners appreciated the simplicity and ease with which they could start recording. 17% of users found the learning curve steep, particularly when integrating the interface with more complex DAW software. Some users felt that additional tutorials or documentation could help bridge the gap for those new to audio interfaces. 83% Warranty and Support 77% of users were satisfied with the warranty and support offered by PreSonus, appreciating the peace of mind that comes with knowing their product is backed by a reputable company. Users found the warranty terms fair and the support responsive. 23% of users were dissatisfied with the warranty and support, often due to perceived limitations in the warranty coverage or difficulties in making claims. Some users experienced delays in receiving replacements or repairs, which impacted their overall satisfaction. 77% Community and Resources 82% of users appreciated the community and resources available for the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, finding forums and online tutorials helpful for troubleshooting and learning. The active user community provided valuable tips and tricks for maximizing the use of the interface. 18% of users felt that the community resources were lacking, with some wishing for more official tutorials or comprehensive guides from PreSonus. Users seeking advanced techniques sometimes found the available resources insufficient for their needs. 82% Microphone Preamps 86% of users were satisfied with the microphone preamps of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, noting that they provide clean and transparent amplification suitable for both vocals and instruments. Users appreciated the low noise floor and the clarity of recordings. 14% of users were less impressed with the microphone preamps, finding them adequate but lacking the warmth or character of more expensive preamps. Some users felt that the sound could be slightly sterile, particularly for vocal recordings. 86% Bundled Software 84% of users found the bundled software, including Studio One Artist, to be a valuable addition to the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96. Users appreciated the functionality and features offered, which enhance the overall recording experience. 16% of users were not entirely satisfied with the bundled software, often finding it complex or less intuitive than other DAWs they were accustomed to. Some users also mentioned limitations in the software package compared to full versions available separately. 84%	Purchase Value 85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation). Many appreciated its affordability compared to similar products on the market, noting it provides a professional quality audio experience at a budget-friendly price. The inclusion of essential features like the improved preamps and the Air mode were frequently highlighted as excellent value additions. 15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to expectations of more features that are available in higher-priced models. Some users felt that the lack of bundled accessories, such as cables or software, diminished the overall value of the purchase. 85% Quality of Material 90% of users found the quality of material to be excellent. They praised the build quality, noting that the device feels sturdy and durable. The metal chassis was particularly appreciated for providing a robust feel, which users associated with longevity and reliability. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of material. Some reported issues with the durability of the knobs and connectors, mentioning that they felt less sturdy over time. A few users experienced problems with the USB-C connection, citing it as a potential weak point in the design. 90% Ease of Use 88% of users were satisfied with the ease of use of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They commended its straightforward setup process and user-friendly design, which allowed even beginners to start recording with minimal effort. The clear labeling and intuitive layout were also frequently praised. 12% of users found the device less user-friendly than expected. Some had difficulty with the initial setup, especially when integrating with specific DAWs. Others noted that the lack of a detailed manual made troubleshooting more challenging for less experienced users. 88% Sound Quality 92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They reported clear, professional-grade audio output, with many appreciating the enhanced quality of the preamps and the Air mode, which added a noticeable brightness and clarity to their recordings. 8% of users were not fully satisfied with the sound quality. Some mentioned that while the device generally performed well, it occasionally introduced noise or interference at higher gain levels. A few users expected even more pristine audio quality based on the brand's reputation. 92% Connectivity 87% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the USB-C interface for its modern, fast, and reliable connection. Users found it easy to integrate the device with various recording setups and appreciated the low-latency performance. 13% of users faced issues with connectivity. Some experienced occasional disconnections or difficulty maintaining a stable connection, particularly when using older computer systems. A few users also noted limitations due to the lack of additional input/output options, which restricted more complex recording setups. 87% Software Integration 83% of users were pleased with the software integration capabilities of the Scarlett Solo. Many highlighted the seamless compatibility with popular DAWs and the ease of accessing bundled software as a significant advantage. 17% of users encountered challenges with software integration. Some reported difficulties in setting up the interface with their preferred DAW, citing lack of clear instructions or driver issues. Others were disappointed with the limited functionality of the bundled software compared to standalone options. 83% Portability 89% of users appreciated the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. Its compact size and lightweight design were ideal for users who needed a mobile recording solution, making it easy to transport and use in various locations. 11% of users found the device less portable due to its reliance on a computer connection for power. Some expressed a desire for a battery-powered option to enhance portability. Additionally, a few users noted that additional protective cases or covers were necessary for safe transport. 89% Durability 91% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its solid construction and the high-quality materials used, which gave them confidence in its long-term performance and resistance to wear and tear. 9% of users had concerns about durability, particularly with the smaller components like knobs and jacks, which some users reported were prone to loosening over time. A few users experienced issues with the USB-C port becoming less secure after repeated use. 91% Aesthetic Design 93% of users were highly satisfied with the aesthetic design of the Scarlett Solo. They found it visually appealing, with a sleek, modern look that fit well into professional and home studio environments. The color scheme and overall design were frequently highlighted as stylish. 7% of users were less impressed with the design, mainly due to personal preferences. Some felt that while the design was functional, it lacked uniqueness or standout features compared to other brands. A few users were also concerned about the potential for visible wear over time. 93% Customer Support 84% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Focusrite. Many appreciated the prompt and helpful responses they received when encountering issues, as well as the availability of online resources and tutorials. 16% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing long wait times and unhelpful responses in some cases. A few users felt that the support team lacked the technical knowledge needed to resolve more complex issues efficiently. 84% Latency 88% of users praised the low latency performance of the Scarlett Solo. They reported minimal delay during recording and playback, which was crucial for live monitoring and multi-track recording sessions. 12% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older or less powerful computers. Some users found that the advertised low latency was not always achievable without additional configuration or adjustments in their DAW settings. 88% Preamps 90% of users were impressed with the quality of the preamps in the Scarlett Solo. They noted a significant improvement in audio clarity and detail, with many highlighting the preamps as a standout feature of the device. 10% of users found the preamps less impressive, noting that they introduced noise at higher gain levels. Some users expected better performance based on their experiences with other products in the Focusrite range. 90% Driver Stability 86% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Scarlett Solo. They reported consistent performance and reliability across different operating systems, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions. 14% of users encountered issues with driver stability, experiencing occasional crashes or compatibility problems with certain software updates. Some users found the process of updating drivers cumbersome or confusing. 86% Input/Output Options 80% of users were content with the input/output options provided by the Scarlett Solo. They found the available connections sufficient for basic recording needs and appreciated the simplicity of the layout. 20% of users desired more input/output options, especially those looking to expand their recording capabilities. Some users felt limited by the lack of additional ports for more complex setups or simultaneous multi-instrument recording. 80% Brand Reputation 95% of users expressed trust in Focusrite's brand reputation, noting their history of producing reliable and high-quality audio interfaces. Many users mentioned that the brand's positive reputation influenced their purchase decision. 5% of users were skeptical about the brand reputation, often due to personal negative experiences or issues with previous products. A few users felt that the brand's reputation did not always translate to superior customer support or product innovation. 95% Compatibility 88% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Scarlett Solo with various systems and software. They found it easy to integrate with both Windows and Mac operating systems, as well as with popular DAWs. 12% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly when using less common DAWs or older operating systems. Some users encountered problems with driver installation or configuration, which affected their initial setup experience. 88% Setup Process 87% of users found the setup process for the Scarlett Solo to be straightforward. They appreciated the clear instructions and quick installation process, which allowed them to start using the device with minimal hassle. 13% of users encountered difficulties during setup. Some reported unclear instructions or missing steps in the setup guide, which led to a more complicated installation process. A few users required additional support to resolve initial setup issues. 87% Firmware Updates 82% of users were satisfied with the availability and effectiveness of firmware updates for the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the improvements in performance and functionality that updates provided, helping to maintain the device's reliability. 18% of users were dissatisfied with the firmware update process. Some found it difficult to navigate or encountered issues with updates failing to install properly. Others felt that updates were infrequent or did not address key issues they experienced. 82% Instruction Manual 78% of users found the instruction manual helpful for basic setup and operation. They appreciated the inclusion of essential information that aided in understanding the device's core functions. 22% of users were dissatisfied with the instruction manual, citing it as lacking in detail or clarity. Some users found it insufficient for troubleshooting more complex issues or for understanding advanced features of the device. 78% Overall Performance 89% of users were satisfied with the overall performance of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its reliability, sound quality, and ease of use, which met or exceeded their expectations for a USB audio interface in its price range. 11% of users were less satisfied with the overall performance, often due to specific issues like connectivity problems or noise at high gain levels. Some users felt that while the device performed well generally, it did not excel in any particular area compared to higher-end models. 89% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

85% of users praised the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 for its great value, noting that it offers a professional-grade audio interface at an affordable price point. Many users appreciated the combination of high-quality sound performance and the inclusion of Studio One Artist software, which enhances its value proposition. The interface is particularly favored by beginners and budget-conscious musicians who find it a cost-effective solution for home recording.

15% of users felt that the purchase value did not meet their expectations, often pointing out that there are other interfaces in a similar price range that offer additional features or slightly better sound quality. Some users were also dissatisfied with the bundled software, finding it not as user-friendly as expected.

85%
Sound Quality

88% of users were satisfied with the sound quality of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, highlighting its clear and crisp audio output. Users found the preamps to provide clean amplification and appreciated the 24-bit, 96 kHz resolution, which delivers a professional sound experience. This aspect was particularly valued by podcasters and musicians who require high-quality audio capture.

12% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, citing issues such as occasional noise interference or a lack of warmth in the recordings. Some users noted that while the sound quality is good, it may not meet the expectations of professional-level audio engineers who require extremely high fidelity.

88%
Build Quality

90% of users appreciated the build quality of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, describing it as robust and durable. The metal chassis and solid construction provide a sense of reliability and longevity, making it a preferred choice for those who frequently transport their equipment for live performances or mobile recordings.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the build quality, mainly due to minor issues such as the quality of the knobs or the durability of the USB connection. Some users felt that while the main body is sturdy, the controls could be more robust to withstand frequent handling.

90%
Ease of Use

87% of users found the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 easy to use, highlighting its straightforward setup and user-friendly interface. The plug-and-play functionality was particularly praised by beginners and those new to audio recording, as it allowed them to start recording with minimal technical difficulties.

13% of users experienced challenges with ease of use, often related to software installation and driver compatibility. Some users reported initial setup issues, particularly on certain operating systems, leading to frustration among those expecting a smoother out-of-the-box experience.

87%
Portability

92% of users were highly satisfied with the portability of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, thanks to its compact size and lightweight design. This makes it an excellent option for musicians and podcasters who need to record on the go, without compromising on audio quality.

8% of users were less satisfied with portability, mainly because they would have preferred a more compact design or additional protective features for transport. Some users also mentioned that the lack of a carrying case as standard was a minor inconvenience.

92%
Compatibility

84% of users were pleased with the compatibility of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, noting its seamless integration with various DAWs and operating systems. The interface works well with both Mac and Windows platforms, which is a significant advantage for users who work across different systems.

16% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with older operating systems or certain DAW software that required additional configuration. Some users also experienced difficulties with driver updates, which occasionally led to functionality problems.

84%
Latency

82% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, which is crucial for real-time monitoring and recording. Many users appreciated the responsive input/output, especially for live instrument tracking and vocal recordings.

18% of users reported issues with latency, particularly under specific settings or when using resource-intensive plugins. These users found that latency could interrupt their workflow, especially in complex recording sessions requiring precise timing.

82%
Customer Support

78% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by PreSonus, appreciating the quick response times and helpfulness of the support staff. Many users found that their technical issues were resolved efficiently, contributing to a positive brand experience.

22% of users expressed dissatisfaction with customer support, citing delays in response times or unhelpful interactions. Some users felt that the support resources available online were limited and not comprehensive enough to solve more complex issues on their own.

78%
Durability

89% of users found the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 to be highly durable, withstanding the rigors of frequent use without significant wear or damage. The sturdy metal casing was particularly appreciated for its ability to protect the internal components during transport and use.

11% of users were dissatisfied with the durability, often pointing to specific parts like the knobs or USB port that seemed prone to wear over time. Some users felt that while the main body was durable, these smaller components could be improved for greater longevity.

89%
Aesthetic Design

86% of users liked the aesthetic design of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, commending its sleek and professional look. The design is often described as modern and functional, fitting well into studio setups both visually and practically.

14% of users were not satisfied with the design, feeling that it was too plain or lacked distinctive features. A few users mentioned that the interface's appearance could be further enhanced to match more premium studio equipment aesthetics.

86%
Input/Output Options

80% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, noting that it provides essential connectivity for most basic recording needs. Users appreciated the dual combo inputs, which allow for versatile microphone and instrument connections.

20% of users felt that the input/output options were limited, particularly those who required more channels or additional connectivity for more complex studio setups. Some users expressed a desire for more advanced features like digital inputs or outputs.

80%
Software Integration

83% of users were satisfied with the software integration of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, particularly the inclusion of Studio One Artist DAW, which is well-regarded for its functionality and ease of use. Users appreciated the seamless transition from hardware to software.

17% of users experienced issues with software integration, often struggling with installation or compatibility problems with other DAWs. Some users found the learning curve for Studio One Artist steeper than expected, which affected their overall satisfaction.

83%
Driver Stability

79% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, noting that once installed, the drivers generally performed well and supported stable operation across different projects.

21% of users encountered issues with driver stability, reporting occasional crashes or disconnections. These issues were particularly frustrating for users in the middle of recording sessions and required troubleshooting or reinstalling drivers.

79%
Overall Performance

84% of users rated the overall performance of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 positively, citing its reliable operation and quality sound output. Users appreciated the consistent results across various recording tasks, making it a trusted piece of equipment in their studios.

16% of users were not fully satisfied with the overall performance, often due to occasional technical issues or limitations in connectivity and features. Some users felt that while it performs well for basic tasks, it falls short for more advanced studio needs.

84%
Flexibility

81% of users appreciated the flexibility of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, which allows for a range of recording applications from music production to podcasting. Users valued the ability to connect microphones and instruments easily, making it versatile for various projects.

19% of users found the flexibility limited, particularly when dealing with larger, more complex projects that required additional inputs or outputs. Some users wished for more routing options to accommodate different recording setups.

81%
Power Supply

90% of users were satisfied with the power supply of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, which is powered via USB. Users appreciated the convenience of not needing an external power source, making it easy to use with laptops and portable setups.

10% of users expressed concerns about the USB power supply, noting that it could occasionally lead to power limitations, especially when using power-hungry condenser microphones. Some users suggested an optional external power supply for more demanding setups.

90%
Learning Curve

83% of users found the learning curve to be manageable, especially with the intuitive design and straightforward controls of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96. Many beginners appreciated the simplicity and ease with which they could start recording.

17% of users found the learning curve steep, particularly when integrating the interface with more complex DAW software. Some users felt that additional tutorials or documentation could help bridge the gap for those new to audio interfaces.

83%
Warranty and Support

77% of users were satisfied with the warranty and support offered by PreSonus, appreciating the peace of mind that comes with knowing their product is backed by a reputable company. Users found the warranty terms fair and the support responsive.

23% of users were dissatisfied with the warranty and support, often due to perceived limitations in the warranty coverage or difficulties in making claims. Some users experienced delays in receiving replacements or repairs, which impacted their overall satisfaction.

77%
Community and Resources

82% of users appreciated the community and resources available for the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, finding forums and online tutorials helpful for troubleshooting and learning. The active user community provided valuable tips and tricks for maximizing the use of the interface.

18% of users felt that the community resources were lacking, with some wishing for more official tutorials or comprehensive guides from PreSonus. Users seeking advanced techniques sometimes found the available resources insufficient for their needs.

82%
Microphone Preamps

86% of users were satisfied with the microphone preamps of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, noting that they provide clean and transparent amplification suitable for both vocals and instruments. Users appreciated the low noise floor and the clarity of recordings.

14% of users were less impressed with the microphone preamps, finding them adequate but lacking the warmth or character of more expensive preamps. Some users felt that the sound could be slightly sterile, particularly for vocal recordings.

86%
Bundled Software

84% of users found the bundled software, including Studio One Artist, to be a valuable addition to the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96. Users appreciated the functionality and features offered, which enhance the overall recording experience.

16% of users were not entirely satisfied with the bundled software, often finding it complex or less intuitive than other DAWs they were accustomed to. Some users also mentioned limitations in the software package compared to full versions available separately.

84%

Purchase Value

85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation). Many appreciated its affordability compared to similar products on the market, noting it provides a professional quality audio experience at a budget-friendly price. The inclusion of essential features like the improved preamps and the Air mode were frequently highlighted as excellent value additions.

15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to expectations of more features that are available in higher-priced models. Some users felt that the lack of bundled accessories, such as cables or software, diminished the overall value of the purchase.

85%
Quality of Material

90% of users found the quality of material to be excellent. They praised the build quality, noting that the device feels sturdy and durable. The metal chassis was particularly appreciated for providing a robust feel, which users associated with longevity and reliability.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of material. Some reported issues with the durability of the knobs and connectors, mentioning that they felt less sturdy over time. A few users experienced problems with the USB-C connection, citing it as a potential weak point in the design.

90%
Ease of Use

88% of users were satisfied with the ease of use of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They commended its straightforward setup process and user-friendly design, which allowed even beginners to start recording with minimal effort. The clear labeling and intuitive layout were also frequently praised.

12% of users found the device less user-friendly than expected. Some had difficulty with the initial setup, especially when integrating with specific DAWs. Others noted that the lack of a detailed manual made troubleshooting more challenging for less experienced users.

88%
Sound Quality

92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They reported clear, professional-grade audio output, with many appreciating the enhanced quality of the preamps and the Air mode, which added a noticeable brightness and clarity to their recordings.

8% of users were not fully satisfied with the sound quality. Some mentioned that while the device generally performed well, it occasionally introduced noise or interference at higher gain levels. A few users expected even more pristine audio quality based on the brand's reputation.

92%
Connectivity

87% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the USB-C interface for its modern, fast, and reliable connection. Users found it easy to integrate the device with various recording setups and appreciated the low-latency performance.

13% of users faced issues with connectivity. Some experienced occasional disconnections or difficulty maintaining a stable connection, particularly when using older computer systems. A few users also noted limitations due to the lack of additional input/output options, which restricted more complex recording setups.

87%
Software Integration

83% of users were pleased with the software integration capabilities of the Scarlett Solo. Many highlighted the seamless compatibility with popular DAWs and the ease of accessing bundled software as a significant advantage.

17% of users encountered challenges with software integration. Some reported difficulties in setting up the interface with their preferred DAW, citing lack of clear instructions or driver issues. Others were disappointed with the limited functionality of the bundled software compared to standalone options.

83%
Portability

89% of users appreciated the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. Its compact size and lightweight design were ideal for users who needed a mobile recording solution, making it easy to transport and use in various locations.

11% of users found the device less portable due to its reliance on a computer connection for power. Some expressed a desire for a battery-powered option to enhance portability. Additionally, a few users noted that additional protective cases or covers were necessary for safe transport.

89%
Durability

91% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its solid construction and the high-quality materials used, which gave them confidence in its long-term performance and resistance to wear and tear.

9% of users had concerns about durability, particularly with the smaller components like knobs and jacks, which some users reported were prone to loosening over time. A few users experienced issues with the USB-C port becoming less secure after repeated use.

91%
Aesthetic Design

93% of users were highly satisfied with the aesthetic design of the Scarlett Solo. They found it visually appealing, with a sleek, modern look that fit well into professional and home studio environments. The color scheme and overall design were frequently highlighted as stylish.

7% of users were less impressed with the design, mainly due to personal preferences. Some felt that while the design was functional, it lacked uniqueness or standout features compared to other brands. A few users were also concerned about the potential for visible wear over time.

93%
Customer Support

84% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Focusrite. Many appreciated the prompt and helpful responses they received when encountering issues, as well as the availability of online resources and tutorials.

16% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing long wait times and unhelpful responses in some cases. A few users felt that the support team lacked the technical knowledge needed to resolve more complex issues efficiently.

84%
Latency

88% of users praised the low latency performance of the Scarlett Solo. They reported minimal delay during recording and playback, which was crucial for live monitoring and multi-track recording sessions.

12% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older or less powerful computers. Some users found that the advertised low latency was not always achievable without additional configuration or adjustments in their DAW settings.

88%
Preamps

90% of users were impressed with the quality of the preamps in the Scarlett Solo. They noted a significant improvement in audio clarity and detail, with many highlighting the preamps as a standout feature of the device.

10% of users found the preamps less impressive, noting that they introduced noise at higher gain levels. Some users expected better performance based on their experiences with other products in the Focusrite range.

90%
Driver Stability

86% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Scarlett Solo. They reported consistent performance and reliability across different operating systems, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions.

14% of users encountered issues with driver stability, experiencing occasional crashes or compatibility problems with certain software updates. Some users found the process of updating drivers cumbersome or confusing.

86%
Input/Output Options

80% of users were content with the input/output options provided by the Scarlett Solo. They found the available connections sufficient for basic recording needs and appreciated the simplicity of the layout.

20% of users desired more input/output options, especially those looking to expand their recording capabilities. Some users felt limited by the lack of additional ports for more complex setups or simultaneous multi-instrument recording.

80%
Brand Reputation

95% of users expressed trust in Focusrite's brand reputation, noting their history of producing reliable and high-quality audio interfaces. Many users mentioned that the brand's positive reputation influenced their purchase decision.

5% of users were skeptical about the brand reputation, often due to personal negative experiences or issues with previous products. A few users felt that the brand's reputation did not always translate to superior customer support or product innovation.

95%
Compatibility

88% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Scarlett Solo with various systems and software. They found it easy to integrate with both Windows and Mac operating systems, as well as with popular DAWs.

12% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly when using less common DAWs or older operating systems. Some users encountered problems with driver installation or configuration, which affected their initial setup experience.

88%
Setup Process

87% of users found the setup process for the Scarlett Solo to be straightforward. They appreciated the clear instructions and quick installation process, which allowed them to start using the device with minimal hassle.

13% of users encountered difficulties during setup. Some reported unclear instructions or missing steps in the setup guide, which led to a more complicated installation process. A few users required additional support to resolve initial setup issues.

87%
Firmware Updates

82% of users were satisfied with the availability and effectiveness of firmware updates for the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the improvements in performance and functionality that updates provided, helping to maintain the device's reliability.

18% of users were dissatisfied with the firmware update process. Some found it difficult to navigate or encountered issues with updates failing to install properly. Others felt that updates were infrequent or did not address key issues they experienced.

82%
Instruction Manual

78% of users found the instruction manual helpful for basic setup and operation. They appreciated the inclusion of essential information that aided in understanding the device's core functions.

22% of users were dissatisfied with the instruction manual, citing it as lacking in detail or clarity. Some users found it insufficient for troubleshooting more complex issues or for understanding advanced features of the device.

78%
Overall Performance

89% of users were satisfied with the overall performance of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its reliability, sound quality, and ease of use, which met or exceeded their expectations for a USB audio interface in its price range.

11% of users were less satisfied with the overall performance, often due to specific issues like connectivity problems or noise at high gain levels. Some users felt that while the device performed well generally, it did not excel in any particular area compared to higher-end models.

89%

Pros:
Affordable price point, making it accessible for beginners. Includes Studio One Artist DAW software for recording and production. Compact and portable design, ideal for mobile recording. High-quality preamps provide clean and clear audio. MIDI I/O for connecting keyboards and other MIDI devices.	High-quality preamps for clear sound recording. USB-C connectivity provides fast and reliable data transfer. Compact and portable design. Easy to use with straightforward controls and setup. Included software package offers great value.

Cons:
Limited to 2-in/2-out configuration, which may not be sufficient for larger setups. No dedicated power supply, relies on USB power which can be limiting. Basic build quality may not withstand heavy use or rough handling. No onboard DSP for real-time effects processing. Lacks advanced features found in higher-end interfaces.	Limited to 2 input channels, which may not suffice for larger setups. No MIDI input/output ports. Phantom power is not individually switchable for each input. Higher price compared to some entry-level audio interfaces. Requires a computer to function, not standalone.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 96 kHz	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	1
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Hi-Z Input (Pin 2 Hot) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line/Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Host Connection
1x USB-B	1x USB-C
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.11 or Later (64-Bit Only) Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit)	macOS Windows
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)

When comparing the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface, several key features stand out.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo offers 2 analog input channels and 2 output channels with a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz and 24-bit resolution. It includes 1 microphone input and features 1 XLR 3-pin balanced mic input, 1/4" TS unbalanced line/Hi-Z input on the front panel, and 2x 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs. Additionally, it has a 1/4" TRS headphone output on the front panel. The device connects to the host via a USB-C port and is compatible with both macOS and Windows operating systems. It is powered via USB bus power, with an optional USB power adapter available but not included.
In contrast, the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary Interface also offers 2 analog input channels and 2 output channels but with a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz and 24-bit resolution. It features 2 microphone preamps and includes 2 combo XLR-1/4" TS balanced/unbalanced mic/Hi-Z inputs (Pin 2 Hot) and 2x 1/4" TRS balanced line/monitor outputs. The device also includes a 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output. The host connection is via a USB-B port, and it is compatible with macOS 10.11 or later (64-bit only) and Windows 7 or later (32-/64-bit). Power is supplied through USB bus power.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo offers a higher maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz compared to the 96 kHz of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96. The Scarlett Solo has a single mic input, whereas the AudioBox USB 96 provides two, which may be beneficial for users requiring multiple microphone inputs. Host connectivity differs as well, with the Scarlett Solo using USB-C and the AudioBox USB 96 utilizing USB-B. Both devices are cross-compatible with macOS and Windows, and both are powered via USB bus power.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 96 kHz	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	1
Input Level Adjustment
2x Knob	2x Knob
Expansion Slots

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface are both highly regarded in the audio production community, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo offers analog I/O channels of 2 inputs and 2 outputs, operating at a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit resolution. This makes it ideal for users who need high-definition audio quality. It comes equipped with a single microphone input, making it a great choice for solo musicians or podcasters who typically work with one microphone. The device does not feature built-in DSP or a built-in microphone but does include two knobs for input level adjustment, allowing for precise control over audio levels. While it lacks expansion slots, its clean and efficient design, coupled with its USB-C connectivity, ensures fast data transfer and minimal latency.
On the other hand, the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 also provides 2 inputs and 2 outputs but at a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz at 24-bit resolution. While the sampling rate is lower compared to the Scarlett Solo, it is still sufficient for most professional audio applications. This interface boasts two microphone preamps, which makes it more versatile for users who need to record multiple vocalists or instruments simultaneously. Like the Scarlett Solo, it also includes two knobs for input level adjustment and does not have built-in DSP or expansion slots. The PreSonus AudioBox connects via USB-B, which is widely compatible but may offer slightly slower data transfer rates compared to USB-C.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo excels in high-definition audio recording with its 192 kHz sampling rate and is ideal for solo work with its single microphone input. The PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, while offering a lower sampling rate, provides greater versatility with its two microphone preamps, making it suitable for recording multiple sources simultaneously. Both interfaces are equipped with essential features for input level adjustment and lack built-in DSP and expansion slots, ensuring a straightforward and user-friendly experience.

Signal Processing
Gain/Trim Range
Mic Inputs: 0 dB to +60 dB Hi-Z Inputs: -10 dB to +30 dB Monitor Outputs: -80 dB to +10 dB	Mic/Line Inputs: Up to +69 dB Hi-Z Inputs: 62 dB

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) features a gain/trim range for mic/line inputs up to +69 dB and Hi-Z inputs up to +62 dB. This allows for a wide range of input levels, making it versatile for various recording scenarios. The USB-C connectivity ensures fast and reliable data transfer, catering to modern computer setups.
In contrast, the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface offers a gain/trim range for mic inputs from 0 dB to +60 dB and Hi-Z inputs from -10 dB to +30 dB. Additionally, its monitor outputs have a gain range from -80 dB to +10 dB. The interface lacks a pad, high-pass filter, and solo/mute functions, which might limit some users' flexibility in managing their audio signals directly from the interface. The USB-B connectivity, while slightly older, remains reliable and widely compatible with many systems.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo provides a higher gain range on both mic and Hi-Z inputs, along with modern USB-C connectivity, making it potentially more suitable for users requiring greater input headroom and faster data transfer. The PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, while offering a slightly lower gain range and additional output gain control, lacks certain features such as a pad, high-pass filter, and solo/mute options, which could be a consideration for users needing these functionalities.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Hi-Z Input (Pin 2 Hot) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line/Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Phantom Power
48 V, Selectable On/Off (Applied to All Inputs)	48 V, Selectable On/Off
Digital Audio I/O

Host Connection
1x USB-B	1x USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0	USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)

Sync I/O

Network I/O

MIDI I/O
1x DIN 5-Pin Input 1x DIN 5-Pin Output

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface are both popular choices for audio recording, but they have some distinct differences in their features.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Generation offers a streamlined analog audio I/O setup with a single XLR 3-pin balanced mic input and a single 1/4" TS unbalanced line/Hi-Z input on the front panel. For outputs, it features two 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs as well as a 1/4" TRS headphone output on the front panel. This interface supports 48V phantom power, which is selectable on or off, catering to condenser microphones. Connectivity to the host is achieved via a USB-C connection, utilizing USB 2.0 protocol. Notably, the Scarlett Solo does not have digital audio I/O, sync I/O, network I/O, or MIDI I/O capabilities.
In contrast, the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary edition has a more versatile analog audio I/O configuration. It includes two combo XLR-1/4" TS balanced/unbalanced mic/Hi-Z inputs, providing more flexibility for different types of input sources. On the output side, it offers two 1/4" TRS balanced line/monitor outputs and a single 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output. Similar to the Scarlett Solo, it supports 48V phantom power, which is also selectable on or off but applied to all inputs simultaneously. The host connection is facilitated via a USB-B port, also using USB 2.0 protocol.
One significant advantage of the AudioBox USB 96 is the inclusion of MIDI I/O, featuring one DIN 5-pin input and one DIN 5-pin output. This makes it a more versatile option for users who require MIDI connectivity for integrating MIDI controllers and other MIDI-compatible devices.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Generation is a more streamlined, straightforward interface primarily focused on high-quality analog audio recording with minimal inputs and outputs, making it ideal for solo musicians or podcasters. On the other hand, the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 offers more input versatility and the added benefit of MIDI I/O, catering to users who need greater flexibility and MIDI integration in their recording setup.

Performance
Frequency Response
Mic Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±3 dB Headphone Outputs: 20 Hz to 30 kHz ±1 dB	XLR Mic Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB 1/4" Line Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.05 dB 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.15 dB
Maximum Input Level
Mic Inputs: -3 dBu (Unity Gain, 1 kHz)	XLR Mic: 9.5 dBu 1/4" Line: 22 dBu 1/4" Hi-Z: 12 dBu
Headphone Output Power
60 mW per Channel into 60 Ohms (Max)	1/4": 32 mW into 33 Ohms 22 mW into 300 Ohms
Impedance
Mic Inputs: 1.2 Kilohms (Balanced) Hi-Z Inputs: 0.5 Megohms (Unbalanced) Outputs: 51 Ohms (Balanced)	XLR Mic Inputs: 3 Kilohms 1/4" Line Inputs: 60 Kilohms 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohms 1/4" Line Outputs: 200 Ohms 1/4" Headphone Outputs: < 50 Ohm
Dynamic Range
AD/DA Converters: 105 dBA (48 kHz Sample Rate)	XLR Mic Inputs: 113 dBA 1/4" Line Inputs: 113 dBA 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 112 dBA 1/4" Line Outputs: 120 dB 1/4" Headphone: 112 dB (at 33 Ohms) 115 dB (at 300 Ohms) Digital A/D Converters: 120 dB Digital D/A Converters: 130 dBA
THD+N
Mic Inputs: < 0.008% (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Unity Gain)	XLR Mic Inputs: -100 dB (at Minimum Gain) 1/4" Line Inputs: -100 dB (at 8 dB Gain) 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: -80 dB (at Minimum Gain) 1/4" Line Outputs: -100 dB (at Minimum Gain) 1/4" Headphone Outputs: -97 dB (at 33 Ohms) -102 dB (at 300 Ohms) Digital A/D Converters: -110 dB Digital D/A Converters: -115 dB

When comparing the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface, both offer distinct features tailored for different audio recording needs.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) boasts impressive specifications, including a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz with varying deviations depending on the input type: ±0.06 dB for XLR mic inputs, 0.05 dB for 1/4" line inputs, and 0.15 dB for 1/4" Hi-Z inputs. It also supports a maximum input level of 9.5 dBu for XLR mic, 22 dBu for 1/4" line, and 12 dBu for 1/4" Hi-Z inputs. The maximum output level for 1/4" line outputs is +16 dBu. The headphone output power is 32 mW into 33 Ohms and 22 mW into 300 Ohms. The interface has various impedance ratings, including 3 Kilohms for XLR mic inputs and 1 Megohm for 1/4" Hi-Z inputs. It offers a dynamic range of 113 dBA for both XLR mic and 1/4" line inputs, with the output dynamic range reaching up to 130 dBA for digital D/A converters. The THD+N values are notable as well, with -100 dB for XLR mic inputs at minimum gain and -115 dB for digital D/A converters. The equivalent input noise (EIN) for XLR mic inputs is -127 dBu A-weighted, enhancing its low-noise performance.
On the other hand, the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface offers a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±3 dB for mic inputs and 20 Hz to 30 kHz ±1 dB for headphone outputs. Its maximum input level for mic inputs is -3 dBu at unity gain and 1 kHz. The headphone output power is higher than that of the Scarlett Solo, providing 60 mW per channel into 60 Ohms. Impedance ratings for the AudioBox include 1.2 Kilohms for balanced mic inputs and 0.5 Megohms for unbalanced Hi-Z inputs. The dynamic range for AD/DA converters is 105 dBA at a 48 kHz sample rate. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is 95 dB at +4 dBu, 1 kHz, and unity gain. For THD+N, the mic inputs have a value of less than 0.008% unweighted at 1 kHz and unity gain. Additionally, it features a common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR) greater than 45 dB at 1 kHz and 55 dB gain.
In conclusion, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) excels in dynamic range, low noise, and harmonic distortion characteristics, making it suitable for high-fidelity recording environments. Conversely, the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 offers a wider frequency response for headphone outputs and higher headphone output power, which could be advantageous for users needing robust monitoring capabilities. Each interface has unique strengths tailored to different audio production needs.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 kHz	44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 / 176.4 / 192 kHz
Bit Depths
24-Bit	24-Bit
Sync Sources
Internal	Internal

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface offer varying specifications that cater to different needs in audio recording and production.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Generation supports a wider range of sample rates, including 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, 176.4, and 192 kHz, giving users more flexibility in achieving high-quality audio recordings. In comparison, the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 supports sample rates of 44.1, 48, 88.2, and 96 kHz, which may suffice for many users but does not reach the higher sample rates that the Scarlett Solo offers. Both interfaces support a bit depth of 24-bit, ensuring high-resolution audio capture.
In terms of sync sources, both the Focusrite Scarlett Solo and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 rely on internal synchronization, which is standard for most audio interfaces in this category. However, the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 specifies a dBFS reference level of +4 dBu = 0 dBFS, a detail that is not explicitly mentioned for the Scarlett Solo. This specification is crucial for maintaining consistent audio levels and ensuring compatibility with other professional audio equipment.
One notable difference is the sample rate conversion feature, which is absent in the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96. This means that the interface does not support converting sample rates during playback or recording, potentially limiting its versatility in certain professional audio environments. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo does not specify this feature, which may suggest it either supports it inherently or does not emphasize it as a key feature.
Overall, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Generation offers broader sample rate support, making it a more versatile choice for users who require higher sample rates for their projects. The PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, while limited to lower sample rates, provides essential features like a specific dBFS reference level, ensuring reliable audio performance in various recording scenarios.

Audio Storage & Playback

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.11 or Later (64-Bit Only) Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit)	macOS Windows

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface each have distinct features that cater to different user needs.
In terms of OS compatibility, both devices support macOS and Windows. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo is compatible with macOS and Windows operating systems generally, while the PreSonus AudioBox is specifically compatible with macOS 10.11 or later (64-bit only) and Windows 7 or later (both 32- and 64-bit versions).
When it comes to mobile app compatibility, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo has an edge as it is compatible with iPadOS, allowing users to integrate it with iPads for mobile recording setups. In contrast, the PreSonus AudioBox does not offer any mobile device compatibility, focusing solely on computer-based recording environments.
Regarding hardware requirements, the PreSonus AudioBox has more specific requirements: it needs an Intel Core Duo processor for Mac and an Intel Core 2 processor for PC. It also specifies RAM requirements of 2 GB minimum for Mac (4 GB recommended) and 4 GB minimum for PC (8 GB recommended), along with a 20 GB storage requirement and a minimum display resolution of 1024 x 768. Additionally, it requires an available USB 2.0 port, which is provided via an included USB cable, and an internet connection for registration and software/driver downloads.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo, on the other hand, does not list such detailed hardware requirements, suggesting a potentially less demanding setup process. This can be an advantage for users seeking a more straightforward and less resource-intensive installation.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) excels in mobile app compatibility and potentially simpler hardware requirements, making it a versatile choice for both desktop and mobile recording setups. The PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface, with its detailed hardware requirements and lack of mobile compatibility, is more tailored to users with specific desktop recording needs who can meet its more stringent system specifications.

Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)

When evaluating the power requirements of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface, there are notable differences.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation) offers flexibility in its power options. It can be powered through USB bus power or via a USB power adapter, although the adapter is not included with the interface. Additionally, it supports an AC/DC power adapter with a specification of 5 VDC at 900 mA. The total power consumption of the Scarlett Solo is 4.5 watts, which indicates its energy consumption requirements when in operation.
On the other hand, the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary model is designed to be powered solely through USB bus power. This means it does not offer the option to use an external power adapter, relying entirely on the power supplied by the connected USB port.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation) provides more versatility with multiple power options, including USB bus power, a USB power adapter, and an AC/DC adapter, with a specific power consumption of 4.5 W. The PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, while simpler in its approach, depends exclusively on USB bus power without requiring or supporting additional power adapters.

Physical
Dimensions
5.5 x 5.5 x 1.75" / 13.97 x 13.97 x 4.45 cm	5.63 x 3.78 x 1.79" / 14.3 x 9.6 x 4.55 cm
Weight
1.3 lb / 0.6 kg	0.8 lb / 363.0 g

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface are both popular options for audio recording, but they differ in several key features.
In terms of dimensions, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo measures 5.63 x 3.78 x 1.79 inches (14.3 x 9.6 x 4.55 cm), making it more compact and slightly easier to manage in tight spaces compared to the PreSonus AudioBox, which measures 5.5 x 5.5 x 1.75 inches (13.97 x 13.97 x 4.45 cm). This difference in size could be a consideration for users with limited desk space or those who prioritize portability.
When it comes to weight, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo is lighter at 0.8 lb (363.0 g), whereas the PreSonus AudioBox weighs in at 1.3 lb (0.6 kg). The lighter weight of the Scarlett Solo may be advantageous for users who need a highly portable interface for on-the-go recording sessions.
The PreSonus AudioBox offers additional rackmount capabilities with an optional 1 RU (1/3-Rack) hardware, which can be beneficial for users looking to integrate the interface into a larger studio setup. Additionally, it has anti-theft features such as a Kensington Security Slot, providing extra security for users in shared or public environments. These features are not present in the Focusrite Scarlett Solo, which may be a consideration depending on the user's specific needs.
Overall, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo stands out for its compact size and lighter weight, making it a great choice for portability and space-saving setups. On the other hand, the PreSonus AudioBox offers more versatility with rackmount capabilities and enhanced security features, which can be appealing for more permanent or shared studio environments.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
2.27 lb	1.305 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
10 x 6.8 x 3.5"	7.2 x 6.1 x 2.5"

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface offer distinctive features that cater to different user needs in audio and MIDI interfacing.
Starting with the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation), it boasts a compact and lightweight design with a package weight of just 1.305 lb. Its box dimensions are 7.2 x 6.1 x 2.5", making it highly portable and easy to fit into small spaces or carry around for mobile recording sessions. The USB-C connectivity ensures fast data transfer rates, which is beneficial for low latency and high-quality audio recording. The fourth generation of this series is known for its high-fidelity preamps and converters, providing clear and professional audio quality.
On the other hand, the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary Interface is noticeably heavier and bulkier, with a package weight of 2.27 lb and box dimensions of 10 x 6.8 x 3.5". This additional weight and size might make it less portable compared to the Scarlett Solo. However, the AudioBox USB 96 stands out with its inclusion of MIDI I/O, which is absent in the Scarlett Solo. This feature makes it a more versatile choice for musicians who need to connect MIDI devices along with audio inputs. The USB-B connectivity is standard, and while it may not offer the same speed as USB-C, it is widely compatible with various systems.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) excels in portability, modern connectivity, and high-quality audio performance, making it suitable for solo artists and on-the-go recording. Conversely, the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary Interface offers greater versatility with its MIDI functionality and robust build, catering to users who require a more comprehensive solution for both audio and MIDI interfacing.