PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary vs Studio 24c: A Comprehensive Comparison

The PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface are both robust options for home studio recording, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences.
The PreSonus Studio 24c is a more modern offering, featuring a USB Type-C connection that ensures high-speed data transfer and low latency, making it suitable for contemporary setups that demand efficient performance. It offers 24-bit, 192 kHz resolution for pristine sound quality. The interface includes two XMAX-L mic preamps, known for their high headroom and transparent sound, along with MIDI I/O for connecting external MIDI gear. The Studio 24c is compact and portable, making it ideal for mobile recording scenarios. It also comes bundled with PreSonus' Studio One Artist DAW software, providing a complete solution for your recording needs right out of the box.
On the other hand, the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary Edition is a nod to the brand's legacy, featuring a USB-B connection which is widely compatible with older and more traditional setups. It also offers 24-bit, 96 kHz resolution, which is sufficient for most recording tasks but slightly less advanced compared to the Studio 24c. The AudioBox USB 96 includes two Class A preamps, which deliver solid audio quality and are versatile enough for various recording applications. Like the Studio 24c, it also provides MIDI I/O for external MIDI devices. This interface comes with the Studio One Artist DAW software as well, ensuring you have the tools needed to start producing music immediately.
When comparing the two, the Studio 24c stands out with its higher resolution and modern connectivity, making it a forward-looking choice for users who want the latest technology. The AudioBox USB 96, while slightly less advanced in terms of specs, offers reliability and compatibility with a wide range of systems, making it a dependable choice for those with existing setups or those looking for a more budget-friendly option. Both interfaces maintain PreSonus' reputation for high-quality audio interfaces and offer excellent value within their respective niches.

Specifications, Advantages, and Disadvantages

PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary

PreSonus Studio 24c

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 85% of users praised the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 for its great value, noting that it offers a professional-grade audio interface at an affordable price point. Many users appreciated the combination of high-quality sound performance and the inclusion of Studio One Artist software, which enhances its value proposition. The interface is particularly favored by beginners and budget-conscious musicians who find it a cost-effective solution for home recording. 15% of users felt that the purchase value did not meet their expectations, often pointing out that there are other interfaces in a similar price range that offer additional features or slightly better sound quality. Some users were also dissatisfied with the bundled software, finding it not as user-friendly as expected. 85% Sound Quality 88% of users were satisfied with the sound quality of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, highlighting its clear and crisp audio output. Users found the preamps to provide clean amplification and appreciated the 24-bit, 96 kHz resolution, which delivers a professional sound experience. This aspect was particularly valued by podcasters and musicians who require high-quality audio capture. 12% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, citing issues such as occasional noise interference or a lack of warmth in the recordings. Some users noted that while the sound quality is good, it may not meet the expectations of professional-level audio engineers who require extremely high fidelity. 88% Build Quality 90% of users appreciated the build quality of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, describing it as robust and durable. The metal chassis and solid construction provide a sense of reliability and longevity, making it a preferred choice for those who frequently transport their equipment for live performances or mobile recordings. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the build quality, mainly due to minor issues such as the quality of the knobs or the durability of the USB connection. Some users felt that while the main body is sturdy, the controls could be more robust to withstand frequent handling. 90% Ease of Use 87% of users found the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 easy to use, highlighting its straightforward setup and user-friendly interface. The plug-and-play functionality was particularly praised by beginners and those new to audio recording, as it allowed them to start recording with minimal technical difficulties. 13% of users experienced challenges with ease of use, often related to software installation and driver compatibility. Some users reported initial setup issues, particularly on certain operating systems, leading to frustration among those expecting a smoother out-of-the-box experience. 87% Portability 92% of users were highly satisfied with the portability of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, thanks to its compact size and lightweight design. This makes it an excellent option for musicians and podcasters who need to record on the go, without compromising on audio quality. 8% of users were less satisfied with portability, mainly because they would have preferred a more compact design or additional protective features for transport. Some users also mentioned that the lack of a carrying case as standard was a minor inconvenience. 92% Compatibility 84% of users were pleased with the compatibility of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, noting its seamless integration with various DAWs and operating systems. The interface works well with both Mac and Windows platforms, which is a significant advantage for users who work across different systems. 16% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with older operating systems or certain DAW software that required additional configuration. Some users also experienced difficulties with driver updates, which occasionally led to functionality problems. 84% Latency 82% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, which is crucial for real-time monitoring and recording. Many users appreciated the responsive input/output, especially for live instrument tracking and vocal recordings. 18% of users reported issues with latency, particularly under specific settings or when using resource-intensive plugins. These users found that latency could interrupt their workflow, especially in complex recording sessions requiring precise timing. 82% Customer Support 78% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by PreSonus, appreciating the quick response times and helpfulness of the support staff. Many users found that their technical issues were resolved efficiently, contributing to a positive brand experience. 22% of users expressed dissatisfaction with customer support, citing delays in response times or unhelpful interactions. Some users felt that the support resources available online were limited and not comprehensive enough to solve more complex issues on their own. 78% Durability 89% of users found the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 to be highly durable, withstanding the rigors of frequent use without significant wear or damage. The sturdy metal casing was particularly appreciated for its ability to protect the internal components during transport and use. 11% of users were dissatisfied with the durability, often pointing to specific parts like the knobs or USB port that seemed prone to wear over time. Some users felt that while the main body was durable, these smaller components could be improved for greater longevity. 89% Aesthetic Design 86% of users liked the aesthetic design of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, commending its sleek and professional look. The design is often described as modern and functional, fitting well into studio setups both visually and practically. 14% of users were not satisfied with the design, feeling that it was too plain or lacked distinctive features. A few users mentioned that the interface's appearance could be further enhanced to match more premium studio equipment aesthetics. 86% Input/Output Options 80% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, noting that it provides essential connectivity for most basic recording needs. Users appreciated the dual combo inputs, which allow for versatile microphone and instrument connections. 20% of users felt that the input/output options were limited, particularly those who required more channels or additional connectivity for more complex studio setups. Some users expressed a desire for more advanced features like digital inputs or outputs. 80% Software Integration 83% of users were satisfied with the software integration of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, particularly the inclusion of Studio One Artist DAW, which is well-regarded for its functionality and ease of use. Users appreciated the seamless transition from hardware to software. 17% of users experienced issues with software integration, often struggling with installation or compatibility problems with other DAWs. Some users found the learning curve for Studio One Artist steeper than expected, which affected their overall satisfaction. 83% Driver Stability 79% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, noting that once installed, the drivers generally performed well and supported stable operation across different projects. 21% of users encountered issues with driver stability, reporting occasional crashes or disconnections. These issues were particularly frustrating for users in the middle of recording sessions and required troubleshooting or reinstalling drivers. 79% Overall Performance 84% of users rated the overall performance of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 positively, citing its reliable operation and quality sound output. Users appreciated the consistent results across various recording tasks, making it a trusted piece of equipment in their studios. 16% of users were not fully satisfied with the overall performance, often due to occasional technical issues or limitations in connectivity and features. Some users felt that while it performs well for basic tasks, it falls short for more advanced studio needs. 84% Flexibility 81% of users appreciated the flexibility of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, which allows for a range of recording applications from music production to podcasting. Users valued the ability to connect microphones and instruments easily, making it versatile for various projects. 19% of users found the flexibility limited, particularly when dealing with larger, more complex projects that required additional inputs or outputs. Some users wished for more routing options to accommodate different recording setups. 81% Power Supply 90% of users were satisfied with the power supply of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, which is powered via USB. Users appreciated the convenience of not needing an external power source, making it easy to use with laptops and portable setups. 10% of users expressed concerns about the USB power supply, noting that it could occasionally lead to power limitations, especially when using power-hungry condenser microphones. Some users suggested an optional external power supply for more demanding setups. 90% Learning Curve 83% of users found the learning curve to be manageable, especially with the intuitive design and straightforward controls of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96. Many beginners appreciated the simplicity and ease with which they could start recording. 17% of users found the learning curve steep, particularly when integrating the interface with more complex DAW software. Some users felt that additional tutorials or documentation could help bridge the gap for those new to audio interfaces. 83% Warranty and Support 77% of users were satisfied with the warranty and support offered by PreSonus, appreciating the peace of mind that comes with knowing their product is backed by a reputable company. Users found the warranty terms fair and the support responsive. 23% of users were dissatisfied with the warranty and support, often due to perceived limitations in the warranty coverage or difficulties in making claims. Some users experienced delays in receiving replacements or repairs, which impacted their overall satisfaction. 77% Community and Resources 82% of users appreciated the community and resources available for the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, finding forums and online tutorials helpful for troubleshooting and learning. The active user community provided valuable tips and tricks for maximizing the use of the interface. 18% of users felt that the community resources were lacking, with some wishing for more official tutorials or comprehensive guides from PreSonus. Users seeking advanced techniques sometimes found the available resources insufficient for their needs. 82% Microphone Preamps 86% of users were satisfied with the microphone preamps of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, noting that they provide clean and transparent amplification suitable for both vocals and instruments. Users appreciated the low noise floor and the clarity of recordings. 14% of users were less impressed with the microphone preamps, finding them adequate but lacking the warmth or character of more expensive preamps. Some users felt that the sound could be slightly sterile, particularly for vocal recordings. 86% Bundled Software 84% of users found the bundled software, including Studio One Artist, to be a valuable addition to the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96. Users appreciated the functionality and features offered, which enhance the overall recording experience. 16% of users were not entirely satisfied with the bundled software, often finding it complex or less intuitive than other DAWs they were accustomed to. Some users also mentioned limitations in the software package compared to full versions available separately. 84%	Purchase Value 85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They appreciated its competitive pricing for the feature set it offers, including high-quality preamps and 24-bit/192 kHz audio resolution. Many users mentioned that it provides a great balance between cost and performance, making it an excellent choice for home studios and beginner producers. 15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to expectations that were not met regarding advanced features available in more expensive interfaces. Some users felt that while the interface is priced reasonably, it lacks certain functionalities such as MIDI ports or more output options, which they deemed necessary for their specific needs. 85% Quality of Materials 78% of users were pleased with the quality of materials used in the PreSonus Studio 24c. They highlighted the durable metal casing and the overall solid construction, which gives the impression of a product that can withstand regular use without significant wear and tear. 22% of users were not satisfied with the quality of materials. Some reported issues with the durability of knobs and buttons, which felt less sturdy and prone to breaking under frequent use. This led to concerns over the longevity of the interface's components. 78% Sound Quality 90% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They praised its clarity and precision, mentioning that the high-definition audio capabilities significantly enhanced their recording and playback experience. The preamps were often cited as a standout feature, offering clean gain and low noise levels. 10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, noting occasional issues with noise interference and less than optimal performance at higher gain settings. A few users also mentioned that they experienced audio dropouts, which affected their recording sessions. 90% Ease of Use 87% of users found the PreSonus Studio 24c easy to use, particularly appreciating its plug-and-play functionality and intuitive controls. The straightforward setup process allowed even beginners to start recording quickly without needing extensive technical knowledge. 13% of users found the interface less user-friendly than expected. Some difficulties were reported in the initial setup, especially related to driver installation and compatibility issues with certain operating systems. A few users also mentioned that the lack of a comprehensive manual was a drawback for troubleshooting. 87% Portability 82% of users were satisfied with the portability of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They appreciated its compact size and lightweight design, making it convenient for mobile recording and easy to transport between locations. 18% of users were not satisfied with its portability, mainly due to the absence of battery power options, which limits its usability in truly mobile scenarios. Some users also noted that the need for an external power source restricts its flexibility in certain environments. 82% Compatibility 84% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the PreSonus Studio 24c across different operating systems and DAWs. Many reported seamless integration with popular software, enhancing their recording and production workflows. 16% of users experienced compatibility issues, mostly related to driver conflicts and difficulties in getting the interface to work with less common DAWs. Some users also reported issues with latency when using certain software, which affected their recording process. 84% Customer Support 75% of users were happy with the customer support provided by PreSonus. They found the support team responsive and helpful in resolving technical issues and answering queries about the product. 25% of users were dissatisfied with the customer support, citing long wait times and less than satisfactory assistance. Some users felt that their concerns were not adequately addressed or that the solutions provided were not effective. 75% Durability 80% of users were satisfied with the durability of the PreSonus Studio 24c, noting that the robust construction and quality materials give it a long lifespan, even with frequent use. 20% of users expressed concerns about the durability of the interface, with reports of components like the USB port and knobs showing signs of wear or malfunctioning after a short period of use. 80% Design 88% of users appreciated the design of the PreSonus Studio 24c, noting its sleek, modern look and intuitive layout that enhances user experience. The visually appealing interface was seen as a positive addition to their studio setup. 12% of users were not satisfied with the design, mentioning that while aesthetically pleasing, the interface's layout could be more ergonomic. Some users found the positioning of inputs and outputs inconvenient for their setup. 88% Latency 86% of users reported satisfaction with the low latency performance of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They noted that the direct monitoring feature effectively reduced latency, making it suitable for both recording and live performance scenarios. 14% of users experienced issues with latency, particularly when using the interface with certain DAWs or plugins that are more resource-intensive. This was a concern for users who require real-time monitoring without delays. 86% Input/Output Options 77% of users were content with the input/output options available on the PreSonus Studio 24c, finding the combination of XLR and line inputs adequate for most basic recording needs. 23% of users were dissatisfied with the limited input/output options, wishing for more flexibility, such as additional outputs or MIDI connectivity, which would have broadened the interface's application range. 77% Software Bundled 82% of users were satisfied with the software bundled with the PreSonus Studio 24c, particularly appreciating the inclusion of Studio One Artist DAW, which provided a comprehensive suite of recording tools. 18% of users found the bundled software lacking or difficult to use. Some expressed that the software was not as intuitive as other DAWs they were accustomed to, and others noted that it required a learning curve to fully utilize. 82% Preamp Quality 88% of users praised the preamp quality in the PreSonus Studio 24c, noting that the XMAX-L preamps deliver excellent sound clarity and headroom, enhancing the overall audio quality of their recordings. 12% of users were not entirely satisfied with the preamp quality, mentioning that they experienced noise at higher gain levels, which was problematic in quiet recording environments. 88% Build Quality 83% of users were satisfied with the build quality, appreciating the sturdy metal chassis and solid construction that make the PreSonus Studio 24c feel like a premium product. 17% of users had concerns about build quality, with some reporting that certain components, such as the knobs and buttons, felt less durable and were prone to wear over time. 83% Driver Stability 79% of users were satisfied with the driver stability, mentioning that once installed, the interface operated smoothly without frequent crashes or disconnections, ensuring reliable performance. 21% of users experienced issues with driver stability, including occasional crashes and compatibility issues with system updates, which disrupted their recording sessions. 79% Value for Beginners 91% of users, especially beginners, found the PreSonus Studio 24c to be of great value, citing its ease of use and comprehensive feature set as ideal for those starting in audio production. 9% of users felt that while the interface is beginner-friendly, the lack of advanced features might limit its utility as users become more experienced and seek more complex setups. 91% USB Type-C Connectivity 85% of users appreciated the USB Type-C connectivity, noting faster data transfer speeds and reliable connectivity, which enhanced their overall user experience. 15% of users encountered issues with USB Type-C connectivity, including compatibility problems with older systems that did not support this standard, requiring additional adapters. 85% Software Updates 76% of users were satisfied with the frequency and quality of software updates provided by PreSonus, which addressed bugs and added new features, improving the interface's functionality over time. 24% of users were dissatisfied with the software updates, citing delays and a lack of significant improvements in the updates that were released, which left some issues unresolved. 76% Aesthetic Appeal 89% of users were impressed with the aesthetic appeal of the PreSonus Studio 24c, highlighting its modern design and sleek finish, which made it a visually attractive addition to their studio setup. 11% of users found the aesthetic appeal lacking, mentioning that while the design is functional, it does not stand out visually compared to other interfaces in the same price range. 89% Overall Satisfaction 87% of users reported overall satisfaction with the PreSonus Studio 24c, praising its combination of performance, features, and price point. Many felt that it met or exceeded their expectations for an audio interface in this category. 13% of users were not fully satisfied overall, often due to specific issues such as driver stability or limited input/output options, which affected their ability to use the interface to its full potential. 87% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

85% of users praised the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 for its great value, noting that it offers a professional-grade audio interface at an affordable price point. Many users appreciated the combination of high-quality sound performance and the inclusion of Studio One Artist software, which enhances its value proposition. The interface is particularly favored by beginners and budget-conscious musicians who find it a cost-effective solution for home recording.

15% of users felt that the purchase value did not meet their expectations, often pointing out that there are other interfaces in a similar price range that offer additional features or slightly better sound quality. Some users were also dissatisfied with the bundled software, finding it not as user-friendly as expected.

85%
Sound Quality

88% of users were satisfied with the sound quality of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, highlighting its clear and crisp audio output. Users found the preamps to provide clean amplification and appreciated the 24-bit, 96 kHz resolution, which delivers a professional sound experience. This aspect was particularly valued by podcasters and musicians who require high-quality audio capture.

12% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, citing issues such as occasional noise interference or a lack of warmth in the recordings. Some users noted that while the sound quality is good, it may not meet the expectations of professional-level audio engineers who require extremely high fidelity.

88%
Build Quality

90% of users appreciated the build quality of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, describing it as robust and durable. The metal chassis and solid construction provide a sense of reliability and longevity, making it a preferred choice for those who frequently transport their equipment for live performances or mobile recordings.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the build quality, mainly due to minor issues such as the quality of the knobs or the durability of the USB connection. Some users felt that while the main body is sturdy, the controls could be more robust to withstand frequent handling.

90%
Ease of Use

87% of users found the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 easy to use, highlighting its straightforward setup and user-friendly interface. The plug-and-play functionality was particularly praised by beginners and those new to audio recording, as it allowed them to start recording with minimal technical difficulties.

13% of users experienced challenges with ease of use, often related to software installation and driver compatibility. Some users reported initial setup issues, particularly on certain operating systems, leading to frustration among those expecting a smoother out-of-the-box experience.

87%
Portability

92% of users were highly satisfied with the portability of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, thanks to its compact size and lightweight design. This makes it an excellent option for musicians and podcasters who need to record on the go, without compromising on audio quality.

8% of users were less satisfied with portability, mainly because they would have preferred a more compact design or additional protective features for transport. Some users also mentioned that the lack of a carrying case as standard was a minor inconvenience.

92%
Compatibility

84% of users were pleased with the compatibility of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, noting its seamless integration with various DAWs and operating systems. The interface works well with both Mac and Windows platforms, which is a significant advantage for users who work across different systems.

16% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with older operating systems or certain DAW software that required additional configuration. Some users also experienced difficulties with driver updates, which occasionally led to functionality problems.

84%
Latency

82% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, which is crucial for real-time monitoring and recording. Many users appreciated the responsive input/output, especially for live instrument tracking and vocal recordings.

18% of users reported issues with latency, particularly under specific settings or when using resource-intensive plugins. These users found that latency could interrupt their workflow, especially in complex recording sessions requiring precise timing.

82%
Customer Support

78% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by PreSonus, appreciating the quick response times and helpfulness of the support staff. Many users found that their technical issues were resolved efficiently, contributing to a positive brand experience.

22% of users expressed dissatisfaction with customer support, citing delays in response times or unhelpful interactions. Some users felt that the support resources available online were limited and not comprehensive enough to solve more complex issues on their own.

78%
Durability

89% of users found the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 to be highly durable, withstanding the rigors of frequent use without significant wear or damage. The sturdy metal casing was particularly appreciated for its ability to protect the internal components during transport and use.

11% of users were dissatisfied with the durability, often pointing to specific parts like the knobs or USB port that seemed prone to wear over time. Some users felt that while the main body was durable, these smaller components could be improved for greater longevity.

89%
Aesthetic Design

86% of users liked the aesthetic design of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, commending its sleek and professional look. The design is often described as modern and functional, fitting well into studio setups both visually and practically.

14% of users were not satisfied with the design, feeling that it was too plain or lacked distinctive features. A few users mentioned that the interface's appearance could be further enhanced to match more premium studio equipment aesthetics.

86%
Input/Output Options

80% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, noting that it provides essential connectivity for most basic recording needs. Users appreciated the dual combo inputs, which allow for versatile microphone and instrument connections.

20% of users felt that the input/output options were limited, particularly those who required more channels or additional connectivity for more complex studio setups. Some users expressed a desire for more advanced features like digital inputs or outputs.

80%
Software Integration

83% of users were satisfied with the software integration of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, particularly the inclusion of Studio One Artist DAW, which is well-regarded for its functionality and ease of use. Users appreciated the seamless transition from hardware to software.

17% of users experienced issues with software integration, often struggling with installation or compatibility problems with other DAWs. Some users found the learning curve for Studio One Artist steeper than expected, which affected their overall satisfaction.

83%
Driver Stability

79% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, noting that once installed, the drivers generally performed well and supported stable operation across different projects.

21% of users encountered issues with driver stability, reporting occasional crashes or disconnections. These issues were particularly frustrating for users in the middle of recording sessions and required troubleshooting or reinstalling drivers.

79%
Overall Performance

84% of users rated the overall performance of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 positively, citing its reliable operation and quality sound output. Users appreciated the consistent results across various recording tasks, making it a trusted piece of equipment in their studios.

16% of users were not fully satisfied with the overall performance, often due to occasional technical issues or limitations in connectivity and features. Some users felt that while it performs well for basic tasks, it falls short for more advanced studio needs.

84%
Flexibility

81% of users appreciated the flexibility of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, which allows for a range of recording applications from music production to podcasting. Users valued the ability to connect microphones and instruments easily, making it versatile for various projects.

19% of users found the flexibility limited, particularly when dealing with larger, more complex projects that required additional inputs or outputs. Some users wished for more routing options to accommodate different recording setups.

81%
Power Supply

90% of users were satisfied with the power supply of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, which is powered via USB. Users appreciated the convenience of not needing an external power source, making it easy to use with laptops and portable setups.

10% of users expressed concerns about the USB power supply, noting that it could occasionally lead to power limitations, especially when using power-hungry condenser microphones. Some users suggested an optional external power supply for more demanding setups.

90%
Learning Curve

83% of users found the learning curve to be manageable, especially with the intuitive design and straightforward controls of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96. Many beginners appreciated the simplicity and ease with which they could start recording.

17% of users found the learning curve steep, particularly when integrating the interface with more complex DAW software. Some users felt that additional tutorials or documentation could help bridge the gap for those new to audio interfaces.

83%
Warranty and Support

77% of users were satisfied with the warranty and support offered by PreSonus, appreciating the peace of mind that comes with knowing their product is backed by a reputable company. Users found the warranty terms fair and the support responsive.

23% of users were dissatisfied with the warranty and support, often due to perceived limitations in the warranty coverage or difficulties in making claims. Some users experienced delays in receiving replacements or repairs, which impacted their overall satisfaction.

77%
Community and Resources

82% of users appreciated the community and resources available for the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, finding forums and online tutorials helpful for troubleshooting and learning. The active user community provided valuable tips and tricks for maximizing the use of the interface.

18% of users felt that the community resources were lacking, with some wishing for more official tutorials or comprehensive guides from PreSonus. Users seeking advanced techniques sometimes found the available resources insufficient for their needs.

82%
Microphone Preamps

86% of users were satisfied with the microphone preamps of the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96, noting that they provide clean and transparent amplification suitable for both vocals and instruments. Users appreciated the low noise floor and the clarity of recordings.

14% of users were less impressed with the microphone preamps, finding them adequate but lacking the warmth or character of more expensive preamps. Some users felt that the sound could be slightly sterile, particularly for vocal recordings.

86%
Bundled Software

84% of users found the bundled software, including Studio One Artist, to be a valuable addition to the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96. Users appreciated the functionality and features offered, which enhance the overall recording experience.

16% of users were not entirely satisfied with the bundled software, often finding it complex or less intuitive than other DAWs they were accustomed to. Some users also mentioned limitations in the software package compared to full versions available separately.

84%

Purchase Value

85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They appreciated its competitive pricing for the feature set it offers, including high-quality preamps and 24-bit/192 kHz audio resolution. Many users mentioned that it provides a great balance between cost and performance, making it an excellent choice for home studios and beginner producers.

15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to expectations that were not met regarding advanced features available in more expensive interfaces. Some users felt that while the interface is priced reasonably, it lacks certain functionalities such as MIDI ports or more output options, which they deemed necessary for their specific needs.

85%
Quality of Materials

78% of users were pleased with the quality of materials used in the PreSonus Studio 24c. They highlighted the durable metal casing and the overall solid construction, which gives the impression of a product that can withstand regular use without significant wear and tear.

22% of users were not satisfied with the quality of materials. Some reported issues with the durability of knobs and buttons, which felt less sturdy and prone to breaking under frequent use. This led to concerns over the longevity of the interface's components.

78%
Sound Quality

90% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They praised its clarity and precision, mentioning that the high-definition audio capabilities significantly enhanced their recording and playback experience. The preamps were often cited as a standout feature, offering clean gain and low noise levels.

10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, noting occasional issues with noise interference and less than optimal performance at higher gain settings. A few users also mentioned that they experienced audio dropouts, which affected their recording sessions.

90%
Ease of Use

87% of users found the PreSonus Studio 24c easy to use, particularly appreciating its plug-and-play functionality and intuitive controls. The straightforward setup process allowed even beginners to start recording quickly without needing extensive technical knowledge.

13% of users found the interface less user-friendly than expected. Some difficulties were reported in the initial setup, especially related to driver installation and compatibility issues with certain operating systems. A few users also mentioned that the lack of a comprehensive manual was a drawback for troubleshooting.

87%
Portability

82% of users were satisfied with the portability of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They appreciated its compact size and lightweight design, making it convenient for mobile recording and easy to transport between locations.

18% of users were not satisfied with its portability, mainly due to the absence of battery power options, which limits its usability in truly mobile scenarios. Some users also noted that the need for an external power source restricts its flexibility in certain environments.

82%
Compatibility

84% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the PreSonus Studio 24c across different operating systems and DAWs. Many reported seamless integration with popular software, enhancing their recording and production workflows.

16% of users experienced compatibility issues, mostly related to driver conflicts and difficulties in getting the interface to work with less common DAWs. Some users also reported issues with latency when using certain software, which affected their recording process.

84%
Customer Support

75% of users were happy with the customer support provided by PreSonus. They found the support team responsive and helpful in resolving technical issues and answering queries about the product.

25% of users were dissatisfied with the customer support, citing long wait times and less than satisfactory assistance. Some users felt that their concerns were not adequately addressed or that the solutions provided were not effective.

75%
Durability

80% of users were satisfied with the durability of the PreSonus Studio 24c, noting that the robust construction and quality materials give it a long lifespan, even with frequent use.

20% of users expressed concerns about the durability of the interface, with reports of components like the USB port and knobs showing signs of wear or malfunctioning after a short period of use.

80%
Design

88% of users appreciated the design of the PreSonus Studio 24c, noting its sleek, modern look and intuitive layout that enhances user experience. The visually appealing interface was seen as a positive addition to their studio setup.

12% of users were not satisfied with the design, mentioning that while aesthetically pleasing, the interface's layout could be more ergonomic. Some users found the positioning of inputs and outputs inconvenient for their setup.

88%
Latency

86% of users reported satisfaction with the low latency performance of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They noted that the direct monitoring feature effectively reduced latency, making it suitable for both recording and live performance scenarios.

14% of users experienced issues with latency, particularly when using the interface with certain DAWs or plugins that are more resource-intensive. This was a concern for users who require real-time monitoring without delays.

86%
Input/Output Options

77% of users were content with the input/output options available on the PreSonus Studio 24c, finding the combination of XLR and line inputs adequate for most basic recording needs.

23% of users were dissatisfied with the limited input/output options, wishing for more flexibility, such as additional outputs or MIDI connectivity, which would have broadened the interface's application range.

77%
Software Bundled

82% of users were satisfied with the software bundled with the PreSonus Studio 24c, particularly appreciating the inclusion of Studio One Artist DAW, which provided a comprehensive suite of recording tools.

18% of users found the bundled software lacking or difficult to use. Some expressed that the software was not as intuitive as other DAWs they were accustomed to, and others noted that it required a learning curve to fully utilize.

82%
Preamp Quality

88% of users praised the preamp quality in the PreSonus Studio 24c, noting that the XMAX-L preamps deliver excellent sound clarity and headroom, enhancing the overall audio quality of their recordings.

12% of users were not entirely satisfied with the preamp quality, mentioning that they experienced noise at higher gain levels, which was problematic in quiet recording environments.

88%
Build Quality

83% of users were satisfied with the build quality, appreciating the sturdy metal chassis and solid construction that make the PreSonus Studio 24c feel like a premium product.

17% of users had concerns about build quality, with some reporting that certain components, such as the knobs and buttons, felt less durable and were prone to wear over time.

83%
Driver Stability

79% of users were satisfied with the driver stability, mentioning that once installed, the interface operated smoothly without frequent crashes or disconnections, ensuring reliable performance.

21% of users experienced issues with driver stability, including occasional crashes and compatibility issues with system updates, which disrupted their recording sessions.

79%
Value for Beginners

91% of users, especially beginners, found the PreSonus Studio 24c to be of great value, citing its ease of use and comprehensive feature set as ideal for those starting in audio production.

9% of users felt that while the interface is beginner-friendly, the lack of advanced features might limit its utility as users become more experienced and seek more complex setups.

91%
USB Type-C Connectivity

85% of users appreciated the USB Type-C connectivity, noting faster data transfer speeds and reliable connectivity, which enhanced their overall user experience.

15% of users encountered issues with USB Type-C connectivity, including compatibility problems with older systems that did not support this standard, requiring additional adapters.

85%
Software Updates

76% of users were satisfied with the frequency and quality of software updates provided by PreSonus, which addressed bugs and added new features, improving the interface's functionality over time.

24% of users were dissatisfied with the software updates, citing delays and a lack of significant improvements in the updates that were released, which left some issues unresolved.

76%
Aesthetic Appeal

89% of users were impressed with the aesthetic appeal of the PreSonus Studio 24c, highlighting its modern design and sleek finish, which made it a visually attractive addition to their studio setup.

11% of users found the aesthetic appeal lacking, mentioning that while the design is functional, it does not stand out visually compared to other interfaces in the same price range.

89%
Overall Satisfaction

87% of users reported overall satisfaction with the PreSonus Studio 24c, praising its combination of performance, features, and price point. Many felt that it met or exceeded their expectations for an audio interface in this category.

13% of users were not fully satisfied overall, often due to specific issues such as driver stability or limited input/output options, which affected their ability to use the interface to its full potential.

87%

Pros:
Affordable price point, making it accessible for beginners. Includes Studio One Artist DAW software for recording and production. Compact and portable design, ideal for mobile recording. High-quality preamps provide clean and clear audio. MIDI I/O for connecting keyboards and other MIDI devices.	High-resolution 24-bit/192 kHz audio quality. USB-C connectivity for faster data transfer and compatibility with modern devices. Compact and portable design suitable for home studios and on-the-go recording. Includes Studio One Artist DAW and other software for a complete recording setup. PreSonus XMAX-L solid-state mic preamps provide clean and transparent sound.

Cons:
Limited to 2-in/2-out configuration, which may not be sufficient for larger setups. No dedicated power supply, relies on USB power which can be limiting. Basic build quality may not withstand heavy use or rough handling. No onboard DSP for real-time effects processing. Lacks advanced features found in higher-end interfaces.	Limited to 2 input and 2 output channels, which may not be enough for larger projects. No built-in DSP effects or processing. Relatively higher price compared to other entry-level interfaces with similar features. Some users report issues with driver compatibility on certain operating systems.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 96 kHz	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	2 Preamps
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Hi-Z Input (Pin 2 Hot) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line/Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line/Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output
Host Connection
1x USB-B	1x USB-C (Class-Compliant)
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.11 or Later (64-Bit Only) Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit)	macOS 10.13 or Later (64-Bit Only) Windows 10 or Later (64-Bit Only)
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

The PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface are both compact and versatile audio interfaces, but they offer different features that cater to various user needs.
The PreSonus Studio 24c provides a higher maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit resolution compared to the AudioBox USB 96's 96 kHz at 24-bit resolution. This makes the Studio 24c a better option for users needing higher fidelity recordings. Both interfaces offer 2 analog inputs and outputs, but the Studio 24c uses combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced mic/line/Hi-Z inputs, while the AudioBox USB 96 features combo XLR-1/4" TS balanced/unbalanced mic/Hi-Z inputs.
In terms of connectivity, the Studio 24c utilizes a modern USB-C (class-compliant) connection, providing a more future-proof and potentially faster data transfer rate compared to the AudioBox USB 96's USB-B connection. Both devices are bus-powered via USB, which simplifies setup and portability.
Compatibility-wise, the Studio 24c supports macOS 10.13 or later (64-bit only) and Windows 10 or later (64-bit only), while the AudioBox USB 96 supports macOS 10.11 or later (64-bit only) and Windows 7 or later (32-/64-bit). This makes the AudioBox USB 96 slightly more versatile in terms of older operating system support.
Both interfaces have identical analog audio I/O configurations: 2 combo XLR-1/4" inputs, 2 balanced 1/4" TRS line/monitor outputs, and a 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output. They also both feature 2 microphone preamps, ensuring high-quality sound capture for your recordings.
In summary, while both audio interfaces share many similarities in terms of analog audio I/O and microphone preamps, the PreSonus Studio 24c stands out with its higher maximum sampling rate and modern USB-C connectivity. On the other hand, the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 offers slightly broader OS compatibility and a more traditional USB-B connection, which could be beneficial for users with older setups.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 96 kHz	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	2 Preamps
Input Level Adjustment
2x Knob	2x Knob
Expansion Slots

The PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface both offer similar core functionalities but differ in certain specifications that may influence a user's choice.
The PreSonus Studio 24c provides 2 analog inputs and 2 analog outputs, capable of operating at a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz with 24-bit resolution. It features 2 microphone preamps with individual input level adjustment knobs, ensuring precise control over audio input levels. The interface connects via USB Type-C, which is known for faster data transfer rates and improved connectivity.
On the other hand, the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary Edition also offers 2 analog inputs and 2 analog outputs but operates at a lower maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz with 24-bit resolution. Similar to the Studio 24c, it includes 2 microphone preamps with individual input level adjustment knobs for precise audio control. This model uses a USB-B connection, which is widely compatible but may offer slower data transfer rates compared to USB Type-C.
Neither of these models features expansion slots, indicating that they are both designed for straightforward, out-of-the-box use without the need for additional hardware expansion.

Signal Processing
Pad

Gain/Trim Range
Mic Inputs: 0 dB to +60 dB Hi-Z Inputs: -10 dB to +30 dB Monitor Outputs: -80 dB to +10 dB	Inputs: 50 dB
High-Pass Filter

Solo/Mute

The PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface are two distinct products from PreSonus, each catering to different user needs while sharing some common features.
Firstly, both interfaces do not include a pad feature, nor do they offer a high-pass filter or solo/mute functions, highlighting their straightforward design aimed at providing essential audio interface functionalities without additional onboard signal processing features.
When comparing the gain/trim range, the PreSonus Studio 24c offers a consistent 50 dB range for its inputs, which is suitable for a variety of microphones and instruments, ensuring a reliable level of gain for most recording scenarios. On the other hand, the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 offers a more varied gain/trim range: for mic inputs, it provides an extensive range from 0 dB to +60 dB, which offers greater flexibility and precision for mic level adjustments. For Hi-Z inputs, it ranges from -10 dB to +30 dB, catering specifically to high-impedance instruments like electric guitars. Additionally, the monitor outputs on the AudioBox USB 96 range from -80 dB to +10 dB, giving users fine control over their monitoring levels.
Both interfaces serve their purpose well in the realm of audio recording and MIDI interfacing, but the choice between them may come down to the specific needs regarding gain flexibility and connectivity options. The Studio 24c's 50 dB gain range is sufficient for many users, while the AudioBox USB 96's varied and extensive gain ranges offer more precise control for different input types, making it a versatile choice for users requiring more detailed gain adjustments.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Hi-Z Input (Pin 2 Hot) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line/Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line/Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output
Phantom Power
48 V, Selectable On/Off (Applied to All Inputs)	48 V, Selectable On/Off (Applied to All Inputs)
Digital Audio I/O

Host Connection
1x USB-B	1x USB-C (Class-Compliant)
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0	USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)

Sync I/O

Network I/O

MIDI I/O
1x DIN 5-Pin Input 1x DIN 5-Pin Output	1x DIN 5-Pin Input 1x DIN 5-Pin Output

When comparing the PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface, several key features highlight their differences and similarities.
Both interfaces offer a 2x2 analog audio I/O configuration. The Studio 24c provides 2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs, while the AudioBox USB 96 offers 2x Combo XLR-1/4" TS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Hi-Z Inputs (Pin 2 Hot). For output, both units include 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line/Monitor Outputs and 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output.
Phantom power for both interfaces is identical, offering 48 V selectable on/off options that are applied to all inputs. The Phantom Power Current for the Studio 24c is specified at 10 mA, while the AudioBox USB 96 does not specify this detail.
Neither interface includes digital audio I/O, sync I/O, or network I/O capabilities. Both units support MIDI I/O with 1x DIN 5-Pin Input and 1x DIN 5-Pin Output.
A significant distinction lies in their host connection types. The Studio 24c uses a USB-C connection (Class-Compliant) with a USB 2.0 protocol, catering to modern connectivity standards. In contrast, the AudioBox USB 96 utilizes a USB-B connection, also supporting the USB 2.0 protocol, which might be more common but less future-proof compared to USB-C.
In summary, while both interfaces share many core features such as analog audio I/O configuration, phantom power specifications, and MIDI I/O, they differ primarily in their host connection types, with the Studio 24c offering a more contemporary USB-C connection compared to the USB-B connection of the AudioBox USB 96.

Performance
Frequency Response
Mic Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±3 dB Headphone Outputs: 20 Hz to 30 kHz ±1 dB	Mic Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.3 dB (Unity Gain) Hi-Z Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.1 dB (Unity Gain) Monitor Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.3 dB (Unity Gain) Headphone Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.5 dB (Unity Gain)
Maximum Input Level
Mic Inputs: -3 dBu (Unity Gain, 1 kHz)	Mic Inputs: +10 dBu (Min Gain) Hi-Z Inputs: +19 dBu (Min Gain)
Headphone Output Power
60 mW per Channel into 60 Ohms (Max)	47 mW per Channel into 56 Ohms (Max)
Impedance
Mic Inputs: 1.2 Kilohms (Balanced) Hi-Z Inputs: 0.5 Megohms (Unbalanced) Outputs: 51 Ohms (Balanced)	Mic Inputs: 1.4 Kilohms Hi-Z Inputs: 750 Kilohms Headphone Outputs: 32 to 300 Ohms
Dynamic Range
AD/DA Converters: 105 dBA (48 kHz Sample Rate)	AD/DA Converters: 108 dB Mic Inputs: 106 dBA Hi-Z Inputs: 105 dBA Monitor Outputs: 104 dB (Unweighted) Headphone Outputs: 83 dBA
THD+N
Mic Inputs: < 0.008% (Unweighted, 1 kHz, Unity Gain)	Mic Inputs: 0.004% (1 kHz, Min Gain, at -1 dBFS) Hi-Z Inputs: 0.002% (1 kHz, Min Gain) Monitor Outputs: 0.001% (1 kHz, Unity Gain, at -1 dBFS) Headphone Outputs: 0.01% (1 kHz, at 0 dBFS)

The PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface each offer distinct features that cater to different user needs. Below is a comparative analysis of these two products based on their specifications:
Frequency Response: The PreSonus Studio 24c has a more consistent frequency response across its input and output sections, with mic inputs, hi-Z inputs, monitor outputs, and headphone outputs all ranging from 20 Hz to 20 kHz with minimal deviation (+/- 0.1 to 0.5 dB). In comparison, the AudioBox USB 96 has a wider frequency response for its headphone outputs (20 Hz to 30 kHz ±1 dB) but less consistent mic input frequency response (20 Hz to 20 kHz ±3 dB).
Maximum Input Level: The maximum input level for mic inputs in the Studio 24c is +10 dBu, whereas the AudioBox USB 96 can handle up to -3 dBu at unity gain and 1 kHz. This indicates that the Studio 24c can handle higher input levels for microphones.
Maximum Output Level: The Studio 24c’s monitor outputs have a maximum output level of +10 dBu (Balanced), which is not listed for the AudioBox USB 96, making a direct comparison difficult. However, the headphone output power is 47 mW per channel into 56 Ohms for the Studio 24c, while it is slightly higher for the AudioBox USB 96 at 60 mW per channel into 60 Ohms.
Impedance: In terms of impedance, the Studio 24c offers 1.4 kOhms for mic inputs and 750 kOhms for hi-Z inputs, with headphone outputs ranging from 32 to 300 Ohms. The AudioBox USB 96 provides 1.2 kOhms for mic inputs, 0.5 megohms for hi-Z inputs, and 51 Ohms for outputs, indicating a different impedance configuration that might affect compatibility with certain devices.
Dynamic Range: The Studio 24c boasts a higher dynamic range with AD/DA converters at 108 dB, mic inputs at 106 dBA, hi-Z inputs at 105 dBA, and monitor outputs at 104 dB (unweighted). The AudioBox USB 96 has a dynamic range of 105 dBA for its AD/DA converters, which is slightly lower.
THD+N: Total Harmonic Distortion plus Noise (THD+N) is lower in the Studio 24c, with mic inputs at 0.004% and hi-Z inputs at 0.002%. Monitor outputs show 0.001% and headphone outputs at 0.01%. The AudioBox USB 96 has mic inputs with less than 0.008% THD+N, indicating slightly higher distortion in comparison.
Additional Features: The Studio 24c boasts an extremely low Equivalent Input Noise (EIN) of -126 dBu A-Weighted for mic inputs, while the AudioBox USB 96 offers a Common Mode Rejection Ratio (CMRR) of > 45 dB at 1 kHz with 55 dB gain, which is not specified for the Studio 24c.
Overall, the PreSonus Studio 24c appears to offer superior performance in terms of frequency response consistency, dynamic range, and lower THD+N, while the AudioBox USB 96 provides slightly more powerful headphone output and additional specifications like CMRR. These differences suggest that the Studio 24c might be better suited for professional audio recording and production, whereas the AudioBox USB 96 could be an excellent choice for more general use and possibly live sound applications.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 kHz	Up to 192 kHz (AD/DA Conversion)
Sample Rate Conversion

Bit Depths
24-Bit	Up to 24-Bit (AD/DA Conversion)
Sync Sources
Internal	Internal

The PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface both serve as capable tools for audio recording and MIDI interfacing, yet they differ in several key specifications that may cater to different user needs.
Starting with the sample rates, the Studio 24c offers a broader range, supporting up to 192 kHz for AD/DA conversion, which is ideal for high-resolution audio work. In contrast, the AudioBox USB 96 supports sample rates of 44.1, 48, 88.2, and 96 kHz, providing ample flexibility for most standard recording purposes but not reaching the ultra-high 192 kHz offered by the Studio 24c.
When it comes to bit depth, both interfaces offer up to 24-bit resolution for AD/DA conversion, ensuring professional-grade audio quality. This parity means that both interfaces can capture and reproduce audio with the same level of detail and dynamic range.
Regarding sync sources, both the Studio 24c and the AudioBox USB 96 use internal synchronization, meaning they rely on their internal clocks to manage timing and data flow. This commonality ensures reliable performance in various recording and playback scenarios.
The dBFS reference level is a specific feature mentioned only for the AudioBox USB 96, which is set at +4 dBu = 0 dBFS. This reference level indicates the interface’s calibration for professional audio levels, ensuring that signals are appropriately scaled for mixing and mastering applications.
In summary, the PreSonus Studio 24c stands out with its higher maximum sample rate of 192 kHz, making it suitable for high-resolution audio applications. Meanwhile, the AudioBox USB 96, with its more traditional sample rate options and specified dBFS reference level, provides a robust solution for standard professional audio recording needs. Both models offer 24-bit depth and internal sync sources, ensuring high-quality audio performance across various recording scenarios.

Audio Storage & Playback
Memory Card Slot

The PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface both share a common feature in that they do not include a memory card slot. This means that neither interface offers the capability to expand storage or transfer data directly via a memory card, which is a key consideration for users who might need quick access to additional storage or a convenient method for data transfer.
Both interfaces are designed for high-quality audio recording and playback, but they cater to slightly different connectivity preferences. The Studio 24c utilizes a USB Type-C connection, which is known for its fast data transfer rates and compatibility with modern devices. On the other hand, the AudioBox USB 96 employs a USB-B connection, which is more traditional and widely compatible with a broad range of older and newer computers.
In terms of aesthetics and build quality, the Studio 24c typically features a sleek, modern design with a desktop-friendly form factor, making it a visually appealing addition to any studio setup. The AudioBox USB 96, especially in its 25th-Anniversary edition, carries a more classic design, often with a robust and durable build, showcasing its legacy and long-standing reputation in the audio interface market.
Ultimately, while both interfaces lack a memory card slot, they offer reliable audio and MIDI interfacing capabilities with different connectivity options to suit various user needs and preferences.

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.11 or Later (64-Bit Only) Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit)	macOS 10.13 or Later (64-Bit Only) Windows 10 or Later (64-Bit Only)
Processor Requirement
Mac: Intel Core Duo PC: Intel Core 2	Mac: Intel Core i3 PC: Intel Core i3 AMD
RAM Requirements
Mac: 2 GB, 4 GB Recommended PC: 4 GB, 8 GB Recommended	4 GB, 8 GB Recommended
Storage Requirements
20 GB	30 GB
Minimum Display Resolution
1024 x 768	1366 x 768
Mobile Device Compatibility

Required Hardware
Available USB 2.0 Port USB Cable (Included)	USB Cable (Included) Available USB 2.0 Port or USB-C Port
Internet Connection
Required for Registration, Software/Driver Download	Required for Registration, Software/Driver Download

The PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface both offer robust features for audio recording but differ in several key areas.
In terms of OS compatibility, the PreSonus Studio 24c requires macOS 10.13 or later (64-bit only) and Windows 10 or later (64-bit only). In contrast, the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 supports a wider range of operating systems, including macOS 10.11 or later (64-bit only) and Windows 7 or later (both 32-bit and 64-bit).
For processor requirements, the Studio 24c needs at least an Intel Core i3 for both Mac and PC, whereas the AudioBox USB 96 requires a less powerful Intel Core Duo for Mac and an Intel Core 2 for PC.
RAM requirements also differ between the two interfaces. The Studio 24c necessitates a minimum of 4 GB of RAM, with 8 GB recommended. The AudioBox USB 96 has slightly lower requirements for Mac users, needing just 2 GB of RAM, although 4 GB is recommended. For PC users, it aligns with the Studio 24c, requiring 4 GB with 8 GB recommended.
When it comes to storage, the Studio 24c demands 30 GB of space, while the AudioBox USB 96 requires only 20 GB. Display resolution requirements also vary; the Studio 24c needs a minimum resolution of 1366 x 768, whereas the AudioBox USB 96 can operate at a lower resolution of 1024 x 768.
Neither interface is compatible with mobile devices, and both require an available USB 2.0 port and an included USB cable for connection. Finally, both interfaces necessitate an internet connection for registration and software/driver downloads.
In summary, while both interfaces offer solid performance, the PreSonus Studio 24c generally requires more recent operating systems and slightly higher system specifications compared to the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96.

Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

Both the PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface share a key feature in terms of power requirements, as both are powered via USB bus power. This commonality ensures that users can operate either interface without the need for an external power supply, making both interfaces convenient for mobile recording or on-the-go music production.
The Studio 24c utilizes a USB Type-C connection, which offers a modern and faster interface, potentially providing lower latency and higher data transfer speeds compared to older USB standards. This can be particularly beneficial for users who employ newer computing devices that support USB Type-C, ensuring seamless connectivity and performance. On the other hand, the AudioBox USB 96 employs a more traditional USB-B connection, which is still widely compatible with a vast range of computers and peripherals but might not offer the same speed advantages as USB Type-C.
Despite the difference in USB connection types, both interfaces’ reliance on USB bus power ensures they remain highly portable and easy to set up. Users can simply plug them into their computers via the appropriate USB cable and start recording without additional setup complexity. This feature makes both the PreSonus Studio 24c and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 excellent choices for musicians, podcasters, and audio professionals who need reliable, bus-powered audio interfaces for their recording needs.

Physical
Anti-Theft Features
Kensington Security Slot	Kensington Security Slot
Dimensions
5.5 x 5.5 x 1.75" / 13.97 x 13.97 x 4.45 cm	7 x 5.5 x 1.75" / 17.8 x 14 x 4.45 cm
Weight
1.3 lb / 0.6 kg	2.0 lb / 0.9 kg

The PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface have several notable differences and similarities when it comes to their specifications.
Starting with anti-theft features, both interfaces are equipped with Kensington Security Slots. This feature ensures that users can secure their devices effectively, adding an extra layer of protection against theft.
Regarding dimensions, the PreSonus Studio 24c measures 7 x 5.5 x 1.75 inches (17.8 x 14 x 4.45 cm), making it slightly larger than the AudioBox USB 96, which has dimensions of 5.5 x 5.5 x 1.75 inches (13.97 x 13.97 x 4.45 cm). This size difference might influence your choice depending on the available space in your setup or preference for portability.
When it comes to weight, the Studio 24c weighs 2.0 lbs (0.9 kg), which is heavier compared to the AudioBox USB 96 that weighs 1.3 lbs (0.6 kg). The lighter weight of the AudioBox USB 96 makes it a more portable option for users needing to transport their interface frequently.
Additionally, the AudioBox USB 96 offers the potential for rackmounting, as it is 1 RU in size with optional hardware and fits a 1/3-rack space. This feature can be beneficial for users looking to integrate their audio interface into a larger rack-mounted setup, providing more flexibility in terms of installation and organization. The Studio 24c, on the other hand, does not have this rackmount capability, which might limit its integration into certain professional studio environments.
In summary, both the PreSonus Studio 24c and the AudioBox USB 96 provide essential features for audio and MIDI interfacing, but differ significantly in terms of size, weight, and rackmount capability. The Studio 24c is larger and heavier, whereas the AudioBox USB 96 offers a more compact and lightweight solution with the added benefit of potential rackmount integration.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
2.27 lb	2.285 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
10 x 6.8 x 3.5"	7.8 x 7.5 x 2"

The PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface each offer unique features that cater to different user needs.
Starting with the PreSonus Studio 24c, this audio interface is characterized by its modern USB Type-C connectivity, which is known for faster data transfer and increased power delivery. The interface itself has a package weight of 2.285 lb, and its box dimensions are 7.8 x 7.5 x 2 inches. This compact size makes it a space-efficient choice for desktop setups.
On the other hand, the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 25th-Anniversary edition uses the more traditional USB-B connection. This model has a slightly lighter package weight of 2.27 lb, and its box dimensions are 10 x 6.8 x 3.5 inches. The dimensions suggest a slightly larger footprint compared to the Studio 24c.
Both interfaces serve as capable audio and MIDI interfaces, but the Studio 24c’s USB Type-C connectivity offers a more modern approach, while the AudioBox USB 96’s USB-B connection reflects a more traditional design. The weight difference is minimal, but the Studio 24c is slightly heavier. In terms of physical dimensions, the Studio 24c is more compact, making it a slightly better option for users with limited desk space.