English فارسی
Home
Zoom H6 vs TASCAM Portacapture X6: Which Portable Audio Recorder is Right for You?

Zoom H6 vs TASCAM Portacapture X6: Which Portable Audio Recorder is Right for You?

The Zoom H6essential Portable Audio Recorder and the TASCAM Portacapture X6 Portable Audio Recorder are both powerful, portable recording devices that cater to the needs of audio professionals and enthusiasts alike. The Zoom H6essential is renowned for its adaptability and ease of use. It features a modular design that allows users to swap out microphone capsules, making it highly versatile for different recording scenarios. With four XLR/TRS combo inputs, it can record up to six tracks simultaneously, and its preamps are highly regarded for delivering clear, high-quality audio. The device also includes a full-color LCD screen, making navigation and adjustments intuitive and straightforward. Its compact size and robust build make it an excellent choice for field recording, interviews, and even music production.


On the other hand, the TASCAM Portacapture X6 is a newer entry into the portable recording market, bringing with it cutting-edge technology and enhanced features. It boasts a large, full-color touch panel interface, which significantly enhances user interaction and ease of use. The device is equipped with six-track recording capabilities and features dual built-in microphones, complemented by two XLR/TRS combo jacks. TASCAM has integrated a high-performance DSP, allowing for real-time effects and processing, which can be vital for professionals looking to refine their audio on the go. The Portacapture X6 also supports multiple recording formats and resolutions, including 32-bit float, providing a high degree of flexibility and quality assurance for various recording applications.


Both recorders excel in portability and audio fidelity, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences. The Zoom H6essential is ideal for users who value modularity and flexibility in microphone selection and input options. It serves well for those who prefer a traditional interface coupled with excellent sound quality. Conversely, the TASCAM Portacapture X6 positions itself as a more modern solution, with its touchscreen interface and DSP capabilities appealing to users who prioritize ease of use and immediate access to audio effects. Each recorder brings its unique strengths to the table, making them both formidable choices depending on the specific requirements of the user.

In the following sections, we will delve into a thorough comparison of the Zoom H6 and TASCAM Portacapture X6 portable audio recorders. This article will comprehensively explore their specifications, highlighting both the advantages and disadvantages of each product, to assist you in making an informed decision.

Detailed Specifications, Advantages, and Disadvantages

VS
TASCAM Portacapture X6 Portable Audio Recorder TASCAM Portacapture X6
Zoom H6essential Portable Audio Recorder Zoom H6essential
User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
  • Purchase Value

    85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the TASCAM Portacapture X6, highlighting its cost-effectiveness given the features and audio quality it offers. Users appreciated the overall performance for its price range, finding the recorder to provide professional-grade recording capabilities without breaking the bank.

    15% of users felt that the price was relatively high for their needs or budget, especially when comparing to other recorders with similar specifications. They expressed a desire for more features or accessories to be included at the given price point.

    85%
  • Quality of Materials

    80% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the TASCAM Portacapture X6, noting its durability and the robustness of the materials used. Many reported that it felt sturdy and reliable in various recording environments, contributing positively to their overall user experience.

    20% of users had concerns about the quality of materials, reporting issues such as a less durable plastic casing that felt flimsy or prone to scratches. Some users expected a more premium finish, which affected their perception of the product's longevity.

    80%
  • Audio Quality

    90% of users praised the TASCAM Portacapture X6 for its excellent audio quality, commending its clarity and the advanced features that allow for professional-grade recordings. Users appreciated the low noise floor and the ability to capture rich, detailed sound, making it ideal for various recording scenarios.

    10% of users were not entirely satisfied with the audio quality, citing occasional issues with background noise or interference in specific environments. Some expected even higher fidelity and were disappointed if they encountered any quality inconsistencies.

    90%
  • Ease of Use

    75% of users found the TASCAM Portacapture X6 easy to use, appreciating its intuitive interface and straightforward controls. Many users were able to start recording quickly with minimal setup, which they found beneficial for on-the-go recording sessions.

    25% of users experienced a learning curve, particularly those new to multi-track recording devices. They found the interface somewhat complex and required time to fully understand all features, which detracted from their initial user experience.

    75%
  • Battery Life

    70% of users were satisfied with the battery life of the TASCAM Portacapture X6, noting that it lasted long enough for their typical recording sessions. Many appreciated that it could handle several hours of continuous use without needing frequent recharges.

    30% of users were dissatisfied with the battery life, feeling that it did not meet their expectations for extended field recordings. Some users reported needing to carry extra batteries or a power source, which they found inconvenient.

    70%
  • Portability

    88% of users were pleased with the portability of the TASCAM Portacapture X6, highlighting its compact size and lightweight design. They found it easy to carry around, making it an excellent choice for mobile recording needs.

    12% of users felt the device could be more compact, especially when carrying additional accessories. They suggested improvements in design to make it even more travel-friendly for extensive fieldwork.

    88%
  • User Interface

    78% of users were satisfied with the user interface, appreciating its functionality and the ease with which they could navigate through settings. The touchscreen and menu layout were particularly praised for being user-friendly.

    22% of users found the user interface to be somewhat clunky or outdated, with a few reporting occasional lag. They desired a more modern or streamlined design to enhance their interaction with the device.

    78%
  • Features

    82% of users were satisfied with the range of features offered by the TASCAM Portacapture X6, noting that it met their professional recording needs with capabilities such as multi-track recording, various inputs, and effects.

    18% of users felt the features were lacking in comparison to other models, expressing a desire for more advanced options or customizability. They wanted additional features such as enhanced connectivity or more comprehensive editing tools.

    82%
  • Durability

    84% of users expressed satisfaction with the durability of the TASCAM Portacapture X6, noting that it withstood regular use and occasional drops without significant damage. The overall construction was deemed reliable for long-term use.

    16% of users were not completely satisfied with the durability, citing concerns over the wear and tear of buttons and dials. Some users experienced issues with parts becoming loose or showing signs of wear faster than expected.

    84%
  • Connectivity Options

    76% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options available on the TASCAM Portacapture X6, appreciating the variety of inputs and outputs that allowed for versatile recording setups.

    24% of users desired more connectivity options, especially in terms of wireless features or more modern connections like USB-C. Some felt limited by the current available connections and wanted easier integration with other devices.

    76%
  • Customer Support

    73% of users had positive experiences with customer support, finding the representatives helpful and responsive to queries and issues. Many appreciated the swift communication and effective problem-solving provided by TASCAM.

    27% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delays in response or lack of satisfactory solutions to their problems. Some users felt that the support team lacked in-depth knowledge about the product.

    73%
  • Warranty

    77% of users were satisfied with the warranty offered, feeling reassured by the coverage and terms provided. They appreciated the peace of mind that came with knowing their investment was protected.

    23% of users found the warranty terms lacking, wishing for longer coverage periods or more comprehensive protection against potential defects or issues.

    77%
  • Availability of Accessories

    68% of users were satisfied with the availability of accessories for the TASCAM Portacapture X6, finding essential items like cases and mounts relatively easy to acquire.

    32% of users were dissatisfied, expressing difficulty in finding compatible accessories or feeling that the available options were limited or overpriced.

    68%
  • Compatibility with Other Devices

    72% of users were satisfied with the device's compatibility with other equipment, noting smooth integration with microphones, mixers, and computers for editing.

    28% of users experienced compatibility issues, particularly with specific software or other brand devices, which limited their recording or editing workflow.

    72%
  • Design

    81% of users were impressed with the design of the TASCAM Portacapture X6, describing it as sleek and modern. They appreciated both the aesthetics and the functional layout of controls.

    19% of users were not satisfied with the design, feeling it lacked ergonomics or was bulky compared to other modern recorders. They suggested improvements in form factor and button placement.

    81%
  • Software Integration

    69% of users were pleased with the software integration, finding the recorder easy to use with various DAWs and editing software. They appreciated the seamless file transfer and processing capabilities.

    31% of users found software integration challenging, facing issues with drivers or compatibility with certain editing programs. They desired more streamlined integration with popular software platforms.

    69%
  • Sound Effects

    74% of users appreciated the sound effects available on the TASCAM Portacapture X6, noting they enhanced their recordings with customizable and professional-grade effects.

    26% of users were not satisfied with the sound effects, feeling they were limited or not as high quality as expected. They wanted more variety and control over the effects applied.

    74%
  • Recording Capacity

    83% of users were satisfied with the recording capacity, finding the available storage options sufficient for their needs. Many appreciated the ability to use high-capacity SD cards for extended recording sessions.

    17% of users felt limited by the recording capacity, especially during long projects requiring multiple backups. They desired more internal storage or more efficient data management options.

    83%
  • Noise Reduction

    79% of users were pleased with the noise reduction capabilities, noting that it significantly improved the clarity of their recordings by minimizing background noise.

    21% of users were dissatisfied, experiencing persistent noise issues in certain environments or finding the noise reduction features less effective than expected.

    79%
  • Overall Performance

    86% of users felt the TASCAM Portacapture X6 delivered excellent overall performance, meeting or exceeding their expectations for a portable audio recorder. Users were particularly impressed with its reliability and versatility in diverse recording situations.

    14% of users felt the performance did not justify the cost or the hype, pointing out occasional glitches or limitations that affected their recording experience.

    86%
  • Purchase Value

    85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Zoom H6essential Portable Audio Recorder. They appreciated the versatility and quality it offers for its price point, noting that it provides a range of features that are often found in much more expensive models. Users particularly valued the multiple input options and the sound quality, which they found to be superior to other recorders in the same price range.

    15% of users expressed dissatisfaction, primarily due to the cost relative to their specific needs. Some users felt that the additional features were unnecessary for their simple recording tasks, and thus, they did not see the value in investing in this model. Additionally, a few users mentioned that they expected more accessories to be included in the package for the price.

    85%
  • Quality of Materials

    90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Zoom H6essential. They reported that the device felt robust and durable, with high-quality components that contribute to its longevity. Users appreciated the solid construction and the professional feel of the recorder, which reassured them of its durability in various recording environments.

    10% of users had issues with the quality of materials, citing concerns about the plastic components used in some parts of the recorder. A few users reported that the device felt bulky and less portable than expected due to its construction, which affected their overall satisfaction.

    90%
  • Ease of Use

    80% of users found the Zoom H6essential easy to use. They appreciated the intuitive interface and the straightforward menu system, which allowed even beginners to navigate the device without difficulty. The clear labeling of buttons and functions helped users quickly master the recorder's operations.

    20% of users found the device somewhat complicated, especially those who were new to audio recording. They reported that the manual was not detailed enough, leading to a learning curve that was steeper than anticipated. Some users also mentioned that the multitude of features could be overwhelming for those who just needed basic recording capabilities.

    80%
  • Sound Quality

    92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality of the Zoom H6essential. They praised its ability to capture clear and high-fidelity audio, noting the low noise floor and the clarity of recordings even in challenging environments. Users found the preamps to be among the best in portable recorders, contributing to excellent sound reproduction.

    8% of users were less satisfied with the sound quality, particularly those who encountered issues with certain microphones not performing optimally with the recorder. A few users also mentioned that the default settings required adjustment to achieve the desired sound quality, which was not ideal for quick setup situations.

    92%
  • Portability

    75% of users were satisfied with the portability of the Zoom H6essential, citing its relatively compact size and lightweight design as advantageous for field recordings and on-the-go use. They appreciated that the device could be easily transported in a backpack or gear bag without adding significant weight.

    25% of users were dissatisfied with the portability, mentioning that the device was bulkier than expected when compared to other portable recorders. Some users found that the need for additional accessories, such as external microphones and stands, reduced the overall portability and convenience.

    75%
  • Battery Life

    78% of users were satisfied with the battery life of the Zoom H6essential, finding it sufficient for most recording sessions. They appreciated the option to use AA batteries, which are easy to replace or carry spares for longer recording needs.

    22% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the battery life, noting that it was shorter than expected during extended recording sessions. Some users were disappointed that the device did not include a rechargeable battery option, which they felt could have enhanced convenience and reduced the cost of purchasing disposable batteries.

    78%
  • Input Options

    88% of users were satisfied with the input options available on the Zoom H6essential. They appreciated the flexibility provided by the multiple XLR/TRS inputs, which allowed them to connect various microphones and instruments. This versatility was particularly valued by users who needed to record multiple sources simultaneously.

    12% of users were less satisfied with the input options, primarily due to the lack of support for certain input types they required for specific recording setups. A few users mentioned compatibility issues with some types of microphones, which limited their ability to fully utilize the recorder's capabilities.

    88%
  • Overall Durability

    87% of users were satisfied with the overall durability of the Zoom H6essential. They reported that the device withstood regular use without significant wear and tear, and its build quality was robust enough to handle various recording environments.

    13% of users expressed concerns about durability, citing issues with certain components, such as the knobs and switches, which they felt were prone to damage over time. Some users also mentioned that the device did not perform well in harsh conditions, such as extreme temperatures or humidity.

    87%
  • Display Quality

    82% of users were satisfied with the display quality of the Zoom H6essential. They found the screen to be clear and easy to read, even in low-light conditions, which aided in navigation and monitoring during recordings.

    18% of users were dissatisfied with the display quality, particularly those who experienced difficulties reading the screen in bright sunlight. Some users also felt that the display size was too small for detailed monitoring, which was a drawback for those who needed to make precise adjustments quickly.

    82%
  • Customer Support

    70% of users were satisfied with customer support, appreciating the quick response times and helpfulness of the support staff in resolving issues and answering product questions.

    30% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, reporting delays in responses and difficulties in obtaining satisfactory resolutions to their problems. Some users felt that the support team lacked in-depth product knowledge, which hindered effective troubleshooting.

    70%
  • Accessories Included

    65% of users were satisfied with the accessories included with the Zoom H6essential, finding the basics sufficient for getting started with recordings.

    35% of users were dissatisfied with the included accessories, expressing a desire for more comprehensive kits that would eliminate the need to purchase additional items separately. Some felt that the lack of a carrying case was a significant oversight for a portable device.

    65%
  • Firmware Updates

    76% of users were satisfied with the availability and ease of installing firmware updates, which they found enhanced the functionality and performance of the recorder.

    24% of users were dissatisfied with the firmware update process, citing technical difficulties and a lack of clear instructions. Some users experienced issues with updates causing compatibility problems with existing setups.

    76%
  • Weight

    70% of users were satisfied with the weight of the Zoom H6essential, finding it manageable for field use without causing fatigue.

    30% of users were dissatisfied with the weight, considering it heavier than comparable models, which they felt affected portability and ease of transport.

    70%
  • Preamps Quality

    92% of users were satisfied with the preamps quality, praising the low noise and high gain capabilities that contributed to excellent audio recordings.

    8% of users were dissatisfied with the preamps quality, encountering issues with certain microphones that did not perform as expected, which they attributed to the preamps.

    92%
  • Menu Navigation

    77% of users were satisfied with the menu navigation, finding it intuitive and easy to use for configuring settings and managing recordings.

    23% of users were dissatisfied with menu navigation, noting that it was not as straightforward as they expected, leading to confusion and errors in settings adjustments.

    77%
  • Build Quality

    85% of users were satisfied with the build quality, appreciating the sturdy construction and reliable performance over time.

    15% of users were dissatisfied with the build quality, citing issues with some components feeling flimsy or prone to breaking under stress.

    85%
  • Recording Flexibility

    90% of users were satisfied with the recording flexibility, valuing the multiple input options and customizable settings for different recording scenarios.

    10% of users were dissatisfied with recording flexibility, finding certain limitations in input compatibility and settings adjustments for specific needs.

    90%
  • Software Compatibility

    78% of users were satisfied with software compatibility, finding it easy to integrate with popular audio editing programs for post-production work.

    22% of users were dissatisfied with software compatibility, encountering issues with certain DAWs and required additional software for full functionality.

    78%
  • Microphone Quality

    88% of users were satisfied with the microphone quality, appreciating the clarity and detail captured by the included microphones.

    12% of users were dissatisfied with the microphone quality, noting that they needed to purchase higher-end microphones to achieve the desired quality for professional use.

    88%
  • Durability in Extreme Conditions

    68% of users were satisfied with its durability in extreme conditions, finding it reliable in moderate outdoor settings.

    32% of users were dissatisfied with its performance in extreme conditions, reporting issues with functionality in very cold or humid environments.

    68%
Show More
Pros:
  • High-quality audio recording with 32-bit float technology, ensuring dynamic range and flexibility.
  • Compact and portable design, ideal for field recording and on-the-go audio capture.
  • Multiple input options including XLR/TRS combo jacks, accommodating various microphones and instruments.
  • Intuitive touchscreen interface for easy operation and navigation.
  • Internal processing effects and editing functions, allowing for on-device audio manipulation.
  • High-quality audio recording with interchangeable microphone capsules.
  • Six-track simultaneous recording capability.
  • Intuitive interface with a large, color LCD display.
  • Versatile inputs, including four XLR/TRS combo jacks.
  • Long battery life suitable for extended recording sessions.
  • Compact and portable design, ideal for field recordings.
Cons:
  • Limited battery life, which may require frequent charging or external power solutions for extended use.
  • Higher price point compared to other portable recorders, which might not be suitable for budget-conscious users.
  • Potential learning curve for beginners due to advanced features and settings.
  • Limited onboard storage, necessitating external memory cards for longer recording sessions.
  • Relatively high price point compared to simpler models.
  • Large file sizes can quickly fill up storage.
  • The unit can be complex for beginners due to its advanced features.
  • Limited onboard effects and editing capabilities.
  • Requires additional accessories for optimal performance in certain scenarios.
Portable Recorder
Form Factor
Handheld Recorder Handheld Recorder
Primary Use Applications
Audio-for-Video, Music Recording, Podcasting Audio-for-Video, Dictation & Transcription, Music Recording, Podcasting
Number of Tracks
6 (3 Inputs + Stereo Mix) 8 (6 Inputs + Stereo Mix)
Number of Input Channels
4 (4 x Mono, 1 x Stereo) 6 (4 x Mono, 1 x Stereo)
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 32-Bit (PCM) 96 kHz / 32-Bit Float
Microphone
Built-In Condenser Stereo Pair, A/B, X/Y Configurations Interchangeable Cardioid Condenser Stereo Pair, X/Y Configuration
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 4
Built-In Speaker
Yes, 0.4 W Mono Yes, 500 mW Mono
Display
2.4" / 6.1 cm Color LCD Touchscreen 2" / 5.1 cm Color LCD
Memory Card Support
microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (64 MB to 512 GB) microSDXC (Up to 1 TB)
Internal Storage
Special Features
Remote Control Capable (Remote Available Separately) Overdubbing

The Zoom H6essential Portable Audio Recorder and the TASCAM Portacapture X6 Portable Audio Recorder are both versatile handheld recorders suitable for various applications such as audio-for-video, music recording, and podcasting. However, they differ in certain specifications that may influence user choice. The Zoom H6essential offers a higher track count with 8 tracks (6 inputs + stereo mix) compared to the TASCAM, which supports 6 tracks (3 inputs + stereo mix). Both recorders feature a similar number of input channels, with 4 mono and 1 stereo input.Show More


In terms of microphone capabilities, the Zoom H6essential comes with an interchangeable cardioid condenser stereo pair in an X/Y configuration, allowing for greater flexibility in microphone options. On the other hand, the TASCAM Portacapture X6 is equipped with a built-in condenser stereo pair that supports both A/B and X/Y configurations, but it only has 2 microphone inputs compared to the H6's 4. Additionally, the Zoom H6 has a built-in speaker rated at 500 mW mono, while the TASCAM's speaker is less powerful at 0.4 W mono.


Both devices offer impressive maximum sampling rates of 96 kHz / 32-Bit with the Zoom H6 utilizing a 32-Bit float format, while the TASCAM uses 32-Bit PCM. The displays also differ slightly, with the Zoom featuring a 2" color LCD and the TASCAM offering a 2.4" color LCD touchscreen, providing a more interactive user experience. Regarding memory, the Zoom H6 supports microSDXC cards up to 1 TB, while the TASCAM limits its support to 64 MB to 512 GB for microSD, microSDHC, and microSDXC cards.


Lastly, the special features of these recorders set them apart. The Zoom H6essential includes overdubbing capabilities, enhancing its usability for musicians and sound designers. In contrast, the TASCAM Portacapture X6 is remote control capable (with a remote available separately), which can be beneficial for certain recording situations. Overall, the choice between the Zoom H6essential and the TASCAM Portacapture X6 will depend on specific recording needs and preferences regarding input options, track count, and special features.

Recording
Audio File Formats
BWF, MP3, WAV BWF, iXML, WAV
Sample Rates
WAV:
96 kHz (Record/Playback)
MP3:
48 kHz (Record/Playback)		 44.1 / 48 / 96 kHz
Bit Depth
Up to 32-Bit (Floating Point) Up to 32-Bit (Floating Point)
Timecode Support
Yes
Included Software

The Zoom H6essential Portable Audio Recorder and the TASCAM Portacapture X6 Portable Audio Recorder both offer versatile audio recording capabilities, but they differ in several key specifications. The Zoom H6essential supports audio file formats such as BWF, iXML, and WAV, while the TASCAM Portacapture X6 includes BWF, MP3, and WAV formats, providing greater flexibility for users who may want to use compressed audio formats for different applications.Show More


In terms of sample rates, the Zoom H6essential can record at 44.1, 48, and 96 kHz, whereas the TASCAM Portacapture X6 offers a maximum sample rate of 96 kHz for WAV recordings and 48 kHz for MP3 recordings. Both devices support a bit depth of up to 32-bit (floating point), ensuring high-resolution audio capture.


One notable difference is the timecode support; the TASCAM Portacapture X6 includes this feature, making it advantageous for users needing synchronization in multi-device setups, while the Zoom H6essential does not. Additionally, the TASCAM model provides signal processing and effects such as compressor, EQ, limiter, low-cut filter, and reverb, which are absent in the Zoom H6essential, giving the TASCAM a distinct advantage for on-the-fly audio manipulation.


Regarding recording time, the TASCAM Portacapture X6 excels, offering an impressive 888 hours in MP3 at 320 kb/s and 46 hours in WAV at 96 kHz/32-bit. The Zoom H6essential does not specify its recording times, potentially making the TASCAM a more suitable choice for extended recording sessions. Lastly, neither device comes with included software, which may be a consideration for users looking for comprehensive audio editing solutions.

Connectivity
Analog I/O
2x XLR 3-Pin Female Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Mic Input
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Female Unbalanced Line Input
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Female Unbalanced Line Output
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Female Headphone Output		 4x Combo XLR-1/4" 3-Pin Female Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Mic Input (Lockable)
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Female Line Output
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Female Headphone Output
Digital I/O
Phantom Power
+24 / 48 V, Selectable On/Off +48 V
Plug-In Power
Yes
System Connection
1x USB-C (Control, I/O) 1x USB-C (I/O, 2.0)
Audio Interface Capability
Multi-Track Stereo Only
Wireless
Bluetooth
*Via Optional Adapter		 Bluetooth
*Via Optional Adapter
Mobile App Compatible
Yes: Android & iOS
App Name: Tascam X
Functionality: Remote Control		 Yes: iOS Only
App Name: H6essential Control App
Functionality: Remote Control

The Zoom H6essential Portable Audio Recorder features an impressive 4x Combo XLR-1/4" 3-Pin Female Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Mic Inputs, allowing for versatile audio input options. It also includes a 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Female Line Output and a 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Female Headphone Output. In terms of phantom power, it supports +48 V, making it suitable for powering high-quality condenser microphones. The device connects via a USB-C (I/O, 2.0) interface but is limited to Stereo Only audio interface capability. Additionally, it offers Bluetooth connectivity through an optional adapter and is compatible with the iOS app, H6essential Control App, for remote control functionality.Show More


On the other hand, the TASCAM Portacapture X6 Portable Audio Recorder is equipped with 2x XLR 3-Pin Female Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Mic Inputs, providing fewer input options than the Zoom H6essential. It includes a 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Female Unbalanced Line Input and a 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Female Unbalanced Line Output, along with a 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Female Headphone Output. The Portacapture X6 offers selectable +24 / 48 V Phantom Power, along with Plug-In Power capability. It also uses a USB-C (Control, I/O) connection and boasts Multi-Track audio interface capability, allowing for more complex recording setups. The device supports Bluetooth with an optional adapter and is compatible with both Android & iOS through the Tascam X app for remote control.


In summary, the Zoom H6essential excels in input options and phantom power, offering a broader range of inputs for diverse recording scenarios. Meanwhile, the TASCAM Portacapture X6 stands out with its multi-track capability and flexible phantom power options, making it ideal for users who require more control over their recordings. Each device has its unique strengths, catering to different recording needs and preferences.

Performance
Max Input Level
Mic Inputs:
+2 dBu
Line Inputs:
+24 dBu
1/8" / 3.5 mm Line Inputs:
0 dBV		 Mic Inputs:
+4 dBu
Line Inputs:
+24 dBu
Max Output Level
Line Outputs:
+6 dBV		 Line Outputs:
+2 dBu
Headphone Output Power
45 mW per Channel into 32 Ohms 20 mW per Channel into 32 Ohms
Impedance
Mic/Line Inputs:
2.2 Kilohms (Mic Level)
9 Kilohms (Line Level)
Line Inputs:
10 Kilohms (Plug-In Power Off)
1.8 Kilohms (Plug-In Power On)
Line Outputs:
210 Ohms		 Mic/Line Inputs:
≥3 Kilohms

The Zoom H6essential Portable Audio Recorder features a maximum input level of +4 dBu for mic inputs and +24 dBu for line inputs. In terms of output, it has a maximum output level of +2 dBu for line outputs and a headphone output power of 20 mW per channel into 32 Ohms. The impedance for mic and line inputs is set at ≥3 Kilohms, with a microphone sensitivity of -42 dB (X/Y) and a maximum sound pressure level (SPL) of 135 dB SPL (X/Y).Show More


On the other hand, the TASCAM Portacapture X6 Portable Audio Recorder provides a frequency response for mic/line inputs of 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.3 dB at 48 kHz and 20 Hz to 40 kHz ±0.4 dB at 96 kHz. The maximum input level for mic inputs is +2 dBu, and for line inputs, it’s +24 dBu. It boasts a higher maximum output level of +6 dBV and a headphone output power of 45 mW per channel into 32 Ohms. Its dynamic range is impressive at 112 dB, with mic/line input impedance values of 2.2 Kilohms (mic level) and 9 Kilohms (line level).


In terms of audio quality, the TASCAM Portacapture X6 excels with a total harmonic distortion plus noise (THD+N) of 0.006% for mic inputs and 0.008% for line inputs, and an equivalent input noise (EIN) of -125 dBu. While the Zoom H6essential offers solid performance, the TASCAM's higher headphone output power and broader frequency response may provide an edge for critical listening and capturing audio in varied environments.

Power
Power Options
Battery, USB Bus Power, AC/DC Power Adapter Battery, USB Bus Power, AC/DC Power Adapter
Battery Type
2x AA (Included) 4x AA
Approximate Battery Life
WAV 44.1 kHz/24-Bit:
13.5 Hours (AA Alkaline, Phantom Off, Recording, Stamina Mode, Built-In Mic)
5.5 Hours (AA Alkaline, All Channels, Phantom On, Recording, Built-In Mic)
11 Hours (AA NiMH, Phantom Off, Recording, Stamina Mode, Built-In Mic)
5.5 Hours (AA NiMH, All Channels, Phantom On, Recording, Built-In Mic)
22 Hours (AA Lithium-Ion, Phantom Off, Recording, Stamina Mode, Built-In Mic)
11.5 Hours (AA Lithium-Ion, All Channels, Phantom On, Recording, Built-In Mic)		 48 kHz/32-Bit:
18 Hours (AA Alkaline, 2 Channels, Recording, Built-In Mic)
AC/DC Power Adapter
VDC Not Included 5 VDC at 1 A (Included)

The Zoom H6essential Portable Audio Recorder and the TASCAM Portacapture X6 Portable Audio Recorder both offer versatile power options, making them suitable for a range of recording scenarios. The Zoom H6 can be powered by batteries, USB bus power, or an AC/DC power adapter, featuring a battery type of 4x AA. It boasts an impressive battery life of up to 18 hours at 48 kHz/32-Bit when using AA alkaline batteries, making it a reliable choice for extended recording sessions. The AC/DC power adapter included with the Zoom provides a steady 5 VDC at 1 A for uninterrupted use.Show More


In contrast, the TASCAM Portacapture X6 also supports battery, USB bus power, and AC/DC power adapter options, but it uses 2x AA batteries. Its approximate battery life varies significantly depending on settings: it can last up to 13.5 hours at WAV 44.1 kHz/24-Bit with phantom power off in stamina mode. However, if all channels are active with phantom power on, the life drops to about 5.5 hours. The TASCAM does offer additional flexibility with AA NiMH and AA Lithium-Ion options, providing battery life of up to 22 hours with lithium batteries in stamina mode.


While both recorders feature similar power options, the Zoom H6 excels in battery life with its four AA batteries, making it more suitable for long-duration recordings. The TASCAM Portacapture X6, on the other hand, offers more diverse battery type compatibility, allowing for varying recording durations based on the user's needs. Ultimately, the choice between the two may come down to specific recording requirements and preferences regarding battery longevity and power versatility.

Physical
Included Accessories
Batteries
Dimensions
3 x 6.9 x 1.5" / 7.5 x 17.4 x 3.7 cm 3.1 x 1.7 x 6.3" / 78.1 x 42.8 x 160 mm
Weight
12.9 oz / 365 g (with Batteries) 13.4 oz / 381 g (with Batteries)

The Zoom H6essential Portable Audio Recorder has a compact size with dimensions of 3.1 x 1.7 x 6.3 inches (78.1 x 42.8 x 160 mm) and weighs 13.4 oz (381 g) when including batteries. One notable aspect is that it does not come with included accessories, which may require users to purchase additional items separately for optimal use.Show More


In contrast, the TASCAM Portacapture X6 Portable Audio Recorder is slightly smaller, measuring 3 x 6.9 x 1.5 inches (7.5 x 17.4 x 3.7 cm) and weighing 12.9 oz (365 g) with batteries. A significant advantage of this model is that it includes batteries, allowing users to start recording right out of the box. Additionally, it features a 1/4"-20 Female mounting option at the bottom, providing versatility for different mounting setups.


Both devices are designed for portability and ease of use, but the TASCAM Portacapture X6 offers added convenience with its included batteries and mounting options. The Zoom H6essential, however, delivers a robust audio recording experience in a slightly bulkier package without included accessories.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
1.195 lb 1.055 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
8.6 x 5.2 x 2.7" 10.6 x 5.4 x 2"

The Zoom H6essential Portable Audio Recorder has a package weight of 1.055 lb and dimensions of 10.6 x 5.4 x 2". Its lightweight design makes it a convenient option for portable audio recording, suitable for various applications such as interviews, field recordings, and music production. The compact size allows for easy transport, fitting comfortably in bags or backpacks.Show More


In contrast, the TASCAM Portacapture X6 Portable Audio Recorder weighs slightly more at 1.195 lb and has box dimensions of 8.6 x 5.2 x 2.7". While it is still portable, its slightly heavier weight may be a consideration for users who prioritize ultra-light gear. The dimensions indicate that it is a bit thicker than the Zoom H6, which could affect how it fits in certain carrying cases.


Overall, both recorders are designed with portability in mind, but the Zoom H6essential edges out in weight, making it a potentially better choice for those who need to minimize gear weight. The TASCAM Portacapture X6, while slightly bulkier and heavier, still offers a compact form factor that is manageable for various recording scenarios.

Customer Images
Zoom H6essential Portable Audio Recorder
Videos