Audient ID44 MkII vs Audient EVO 8: In-Depth Comparison and Review

The Audient EVO 8 and Audient ID44 MkII are both high-quality desktop audio interfaces, but they cater to different needs and levels of expertise.
The Audient EVO 8 is a 4x4 USB Type-C audio interface that is designed for simplicity and ease of use, making it an excellent choice for beginners, podcasters, and small home studios. It features four EVO preamps, Smartgain technology that automatically sets the input levels, and a sleek, compact design. The EVO 8 is known for its intuitive user experience, including a large volume knob and clear metering. It also offers two headphone outputs, which is convenient for collaborative work. Its USB Type-C connectivity ensures fast and reliable data transfer. Overall, the EVO 8 is a user-friendly interface that delivers professional-quality sound without the complexity.
On the other hand, the Audient ID44 MkII is a 20x24 USB audio interface that is aimed at professional producers, engineers, and musicians who require more extensive I/O options and advanced features. It comes with four Class-A Audient Console mic preamps, ADAT expandability for additional inputs, and superior conversion technology with 126dB dynamic range. The ID44 MkII also offers two JFET instrument inputs, two independent headphone outputs, and comprehensive monitor control options. Its design includes a robust metal chassis and a large, tactile volume knob for precise control. The ID44 MkII is built for those who need a versatile and powerful interface capable of handling complex recording sessions and larger setups.
In summary, while both interfaces uphold Audient's reputation for high-quality audio and build, the EVO 8 is perfect for users who need a straightforward, portable, and efficient solution. In contrast, the ID44 MkII is tailored for professionals needing more I/O flexibility, superior sound quality, and advanced control features.

Specifications, Advantages, and Disadvantages

Audient ID44 MkII

Audient EVO 8

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 85% of users found the Audient ID44 MkII to be a great investment, praising its rich feature set and robust build quality relative to its price. Many users appreciated the high-quality preamps and conversion capabilities that rival more expensive interfaces, making it a strong contender for both home and professional studios. 15% of users felt that the interface was slightly overpriced, especially considering the competition that offers similar features at a lower cost. Some users also expected bundled software or additional accessories, which they believed would have increased the overall value. 85% Audio Quality 90% of users were impressed by the pristine audio quality delivered by the Audient ID44 MkII. They highlighted the clear and transparent sound, high-quality DACs, and clean gain from the preamps as major strengths, contributing to an excellent recording and mixing experience. 10% of users encountered issues with audio quality, often related to their specific setup or external noise interference. A few users expected an even higher fidelity experience, especially those transitioning from high-end professional equipment. 90% Build Quality 88% of users were satisfied with the sturdy and durable construction of the Audient ID44 MkII. The solid metal chassis and well-designed controls were frequently mentioned as elements that contributed to a sense of reliability and longevity. 12% of users noted concerns with certain knobs or buttons feeling less durable, expressing worry about potential long-term wear and tear. Some also mentioned issues with the weight of the device, which could be a concern for those needing a more portable interface. 88% Ease of Use 82% of users found the Audient ID44 MkII easy to use, with an intuitive layout that simplifies the recording process. The inclusion of user-friendly software and clear documentation helped many users quickly get up to speed with the device's functions. 18% of users experienced a learning curve, especially if they were new to using audio interfaces. Some felt that the software could be more intuitive, and a few users encountered compatibility issues with specific DAWs or operating systems. 82% Connectivity Options 87% of users appreciated the extensive connectivity options available with the Audient ID44 MkII, including ADAT expandability and multiple outputs, which accommodate diverse recording setups and expand future flexibility. 13% of users were dissatisfied with the lack of certain digital connections, such as Thunderbolt, which they felt would have enhanced the interface's versatility and future-proofing capabilities. 87% Customer Support 80% of users reported positive experiences with Audient's customer support, finding the team responsive and helpful in resolving technical issues or answering product questions. 20% of users encountered delays in receiving support or found the assistance provided insufficient for resolving complex technical problems, leading to frustration and extended downtime. 80% Driver Stability 83% of users experienced stable and reliable performance from the Audient ID44 MkII drivers, noting seamless integration with various DAWs and minimal latency during recording sessions. 17% of users faced driver-related issues, including occasional crashes or compatibility problems, particularly on newer operating systems or with specific software updates. 83% Portability 70% of users who valued portability were relatively satisfied, appreciating the compact design that allows the Audient ID44 MkII to fit into mobile recording setups, despite being slightly larger than ultra-portable models. 30% of users found the device less portable than desired, with its weight and size making it cumbersome for frequent travel or quick on-the-go recording sessions. 70% Latency Performance 85% of users were pleased with the low latency performance of the Audient ID44 MkII, which allowed for smooth, real-time monitoring and seamless recording without noticeable delays. 15% of users encountered latency issues, often tied to their specific system configurations or when using resource-intensive plugins, which impacted their recording workflow. 85% Software Integration 78% of users found the interface's software integration satisfactory, with the provided software tools enhancing their recording capabilities and workflow efficiency. 22% of users were unhappy with the software integration, citing difficulties in setup or lack of advanced features compared to competitive offerings, which hindered their creative process. 78% Preamps Quality 92% of users were extremely satisfied with the quality of the preamps in the Audient ID44 MkII, praising their clean, transparent sound and sufficient gain for a wide range of microphones. 8% of users felt the preamps didn't meet their specific needs, often preferring a more colored sound or requiring additional external preamps for certain applications. 92% Expandability 90% of users valued the expandability options provided by the Audient ID44 MkII, particularly the ADAT ports, which allow for easy integration of additional inputs and outputs as their studio needs grow. 10% of users desired even more expandability options, such as additional built-in channels, to accommodate larger, more complex recording setups without relying on external gear. 90% Design and Aesthetics 86% of users appreciated the sleek and professional design of the Audient ID44 MkII, which not only looks attractive in a studio setup but also provides a logical and ergonomic interface layout. 14% of users were less impressed by the design, finding it either too utilitarian or preferring more visual flair and customizable aesthetic options to suit their personal studio style. 86% User Manual Quality 82% of users found the user manual to be comprehensive and clear, providing detailed information that helped them maximize the interface's features and troubleshoot any minor issues effectively. 18% of users criticized the manual for lacking depth in certain areas or failing to address specific technical questions, which necessitated additional research or reliance on customer support. 82% Compatibility with DAWs 88% of users reported excellent compatibility with a wide range of DAWs, appreciating the seamless integration and minimal setup required to get the Audient ID44 MkII working with their preferred software. 12% of users experienced compatibility issues, particularly with less common DAWs or older software versions, which required additional configuration or workarounds to resolve. 88% Monitoring Features 84% of users were satisfied with the monitoring features of the Audient ID44 MkII, particularly the customizable mixer software and multiple headphone outputs that cater to diverse monitoring needs. 16% of users desired more advanced monitoring options, such as additional independent headphone mixes or enhanced control over various monitoring settings, to better suit their specific recording scenarios. 84% Firmware Updates 80% of users appreciated the regular firmware updates provided by Audient, which often included performance enhancements and bug fixes that improved the overall functionality of the ID44 MkII. 20% of users found the update process cumbersome or encountered issues post-update, such as new bugs or compatibility problems, leading to frustration and a preference for more streamlined update procedures. 80% Learning Curve 75% of users felt comfortable navigating the features and controls of the Audient ID44 MkII after a brief adjustment period, aided by the intuitive design and supportive resources. 25% of users encountered a steeper learning curve, especially those new to advanced audio interfaces, requiring significant time and effort to fully understand and utilize all the available features. 75% Durability 85% of users were confident in the long-term durability of the Audient ID44 MkII, citing the high-quality materials and construction that withstand regular use without issues. 15% of users reported concerns with durability, particularly regarding specific components such as knobs or connectors, which they felt might not hold up under heavy or prolonged usage. 85% Value for Money 86% of users believed the Audient ID44 MkII offered excellent value for money, given its high-quality audio performance and professional-grade features that cater to serious recording enthusiasts and professionals alike. 14% of users felt the price point was high compared to similar offerings on the market, particularly for those who did not require all the advanced features or had a limited budget. 86%	Purchase Value 85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Audient EVO 8, citing that it offers a great balance between price and features. Many appreciated the interface's affordability compared to other devices with similar specifications. Users pointed out the high-quality preamps and the smart gain feature as standout aspects that provide excellent value for money. 15% of users felt dissatisfied with the purchase value, often comparing it unfavorably to cheaper alternatives or expecting more features at this price point. Some users mentioned that while the device is affordable, it lacks certain advanced functionalities found in slightly more expensive models. 85% Quality of Materials 80% of users expressed satisfaction with the quality of materials used in the Audient EVO 8. They appreciated the robust build and the sleek, modern design. Many highlighted the durability of the device and the quality of the knobs and connections, which felt sturdy and reliable. 20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of materials, noting that the plastic components felt less premium than expected. Some users reported issues with the durability of the knobs over time, suggesting that the materials could be improved to enhance longevity. 80% Ease of Use 90% of users were highly satisfied with how easy the Audient EVO 8 is to use, praising its intuitive design and straightforward setup process. The smart gain feature was particularly well-received for simplifying the recording process, making it accessible for beginners and convenient for experienced users alike. 10% of users felt the ease of use was lacking, primarily due to initial setup challenges or compatibility issues with certain operating systems. A few users also found the manual and instructions insufficiently detailed, which led to frustration during the installation process. 90% Audio Quality 95% of users were extremely satisfied with the audio quality provided by the Audient EVO 8, with many praising the clarity and detail it delivers. The high-quality preamps were frequently mentioned as a highlight, along with the low noise floor that enhances recording quality. 5% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the audio quality, often due to specific issues like background noise or interference that they encountered. Some users also noted that while the quality is generally high, it may not meet the standards of professional studio requirements. 95% Portability 75% of users were satisfied with the portability of the Audient EVO 8, appreciating its compact size and lightweight design, which makes it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions or live performances. 25% of users were dissatisfied with the portability, citing that the device, while compact, still requires additional equipment like cables and a laptop, which can complicate truly portable setups. Some users desired a more integrated solution. 75% Connectivity Options 85% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options offered by the Audient EVO 8. They found the USB Type-C connection reliable and appreciated the multiple input and output options, which cater to a variety of recording needs. 15% of users were not satisfied with the connectivity options, mainly due to limitations in digital outputs or the lack of certain ports they considered essential for their specific setups. Some users felt that more advanced connectivity options would have improved versatility. 85% Software Integration 80% of users were satisfied with the software integration, finding it seamless with most digital audio workstations (DAWs). Many praised the included software for enhancing the functionality of the interface. 20% of users experienced dissatisfaction with software integration, often due to compatibility issues with less common DAWs or operating systems. Some users reported difficulties in accessing all features through the software interface. 80% Customer Support 70% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Audient, noting prompt responses and helpful guidance during troubleshooting. Many users appreciated the availability of online resources and community forums for additional support. 30% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses or inadequate solutions to their issues. Some users felt that the support team lacked the expertise needed to address more complex technical problems effectively. 70% Durability 75% of users expressed satisfaction with the durability of the Audient EVO 8, mentioning that it withstood regular use without significant wear and tear. Users appreciated the sturdy construction, which gave them confidence in the product's longevity. 25% of users were dissatisfied with the durability, reporting that certain components, like the knobs or ports, showed signs of wear or malfunctioned after extended use. Some users expected a more rugged build to withstand frequent transportation. 75% Versatility 85% of users appreciated the versatility of the Audient EVO 8, noting its ability to handle various recording scenarios from podcasts to music production. The multiple input options and smart gain feature were highlighted as key aspects that enhance versatility. 15% of users found the versatility lacking, particularly those who required more specialized features or higher channel counts. Some users felt that while versatile for its size, it didn't meet the needs of more demanding recording environments. 85% Latency Performance 90% of users were impressed with the low latency performance of the Audient EVO 8, which ensured smooth recording and monitoring experiences. Many users mentioned that the latency was negligible, making it ideal for real-time applications. 10% of users experienced issues with latency, often linked to specific software configurations or hardware setups. Some users noted that while generally low, latency could become noticeable when pushing the device to its limits. 90% Aesthetic Design 80% of users were pleased with the aesthetic design of the Audient EVO 8, appreciating its modern and sleek appearance. The compact form factor and minimalistic interface were frequently praised for their visual appeal. 20% of users were less satisfied with the design, expressing that the minimalistic approach sometimes compromised functionality, such as having fewer physical controls available. Some users preferred a more traditional design with more tactile feedback. 80% User Manual Clarity 70% of users found the user manual to be clear and helpful, providing adequate information for setup and operation. Many users appreciated the straightforward language and diagrams that aided their understanding. 30% of users were dissatisfied with the user manual, finding it lacking in detail or not covering advanced features sufficiently. Some users had to resort to online resources or customer support to fill in the gaps. 70% Driver Stability 85% of users reported satisfaction with the stability of the drivers for the Audient EVO 8, noting that they experienced few to no crashes or glitches during operation. Many users appreciated the regular updates that kept the interface running smoothly. 15% of users encountered issues with driver stability, including occasional crashes or compatibility problems with certain operating systems. Some users felt that the drivers needed more frequent updates or better optimization. 85% Smart Gain Feature 95% of users were thrilled with the smart gain feature, which made setting levels easy and efficient. Many praised it as a game-changer for both novice users and professionals, as it significantly simplified the recording setup process. 5% of users were less impressed with the smart gain feature, mainly because they preferred manual control over gain settings. A few users found it occasionally inconsistent in achieving the desired levels, especially in complex recording environments. 95% Size and Weight 80% of users were satisfied with the size and weight of the Audient EVO 8, finding it compact and lightweight enough for easy transportation, which is ideal for users with limited workspace or those who travel frequently. 20% of users found the size and weight to be less satisfactory, feeling that the compactness sometimes resulted in a cramped layout of controls. Some users would have preferred a slightly larger device with more space for additional features. 80% Included Software 75% of users appreciated the included software, which added value to the Audient EVO 8 by enhancing its functionality. Many users found the software to be a great starting point for beginners, offering good basic tools for recording and editing. 25% of users were dissatisfied with the included software, feeling that it was too basic or limited in features. Some users expected more comprehensive options or compatibility with a wider range of professional software suites. 75% Preamp Quality 90% of users were impressed with the preamp quality of the Audient EVO 8, highlighting the clean and transparent sound it delivers. Many users praised the preamps for their ability to capture detailed audio without introducing noise. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the preamp quality, noting that while generally high, it occasionally fell short in very demanding recording situations. Some users compared it unfavorably to more expensive, high-end preamps. 90% Compatibility with DAWs 85% of users reported good compatibility with a wide range of DAWs, appreciating the seamless integration and plug-and-play functionality. Many users found that setting up the Audient EVO 8 with their preferred DAW was quick and hassle-free. 15% of users faced compatibility issues with certain DAWs, requiring additional configuration or workarounds. Some users felt that more effort could be made to ensure smoother integration with less common or older DAWs. 85% Noise Floor 90% of users were satisfied with the low noise floor of the Audient EVO 8, which contributed to clear and pristine recordings. Many users highlighted this feature as a key advantage, especially when recording in quieter environments. 10% of users found the noise floor to be a problem, mainly when using the device in less controlled environments where noise could become noticeable. Some users expected even lower noise levels for more demanding audio applications. 90% Overall Performance 88% of users were satisfied with the overall performance of the Audient EVO 8, praising its reliability, excellent audio quality, and user-friendly features. Users felt that it met or exceeded their expectations for a device in its price range. 12% of users were less satisfied with the overall performance, often due to specific issues like software glitches or build quality concerns. Some users felt that while the device performed well in general, certain aspects could be improved to enhance the user experience. 88% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

85% of users found the Audient ID44 MkII to be a great investment, praising its rich feature set and robust build quality relative to its price. Many users appreciated the high-quality preamps and conversion capabilities that rival more expensive interfaces, making it a strong contender for both home and professional studios.

15% of users felt that the interface was slightly overpriced, especially considering the competition that offers similar features at a lower cost. Some users also expected bundled software or additional accessories, which they believed would have increased the overall value.

85%
Audio Quality

90% of users were impressed by the pristine audio quality delivered by the Audient ID44 MkII. They highlighted the clear and transparent sound, high-quality DACs, and clean gain from the preamps as major strengths, contributing to an excellent recording and mixing experience.

10% of users encountered issues with audio quality, often related to their specific setup or external noise interference. A few users expected an even higher fidelity experience, especially those transitioning from high-end professional equipment.

90%
Build Quality

88% of users were satisfied with the sturdy and durable construction of the Audient ID44 MkII. The solid metal chassis and well-designed controls were frequently mentioned as elements that contributed to a sense of reliability and longevity.

12% of users noted concerns with certain knobs or buttons feeling less durable, expressing worry about potential long-term wear and tear. Some also mentioned issues with the weight of the device, which could be a concern for those needing a more portable interface.

88%
Ease of Use

82% of users found the Audient ID44 MkII easy to use, with an intuitive layout that simplifies the recording process. The inclusion of user-friendly software and clear documentation helped many users quickly get up to speed with the device's functions.

18% of users experienced a learning curve, especially if they were new to using audio interfaces. Some felt that the software could be more intuitive, and a few users encountered compatibility issues with specific DAWs or operating systems.

82%
Connectivity Options

87% of users appreciated the extensive connectivity options available with the Audient ID44 MkII, including ADAT expandability and multiple outputs, which accommodate diverse recording setups and expand future flexibility.

13% of users were dissatisfied with the lack of certain digital connections, such as Thunderbolt, which they felt would have enhanced the interface's versatility and future-proofing capabilities.

87%
Customer Support

80% of users reported positive experiences with Audient's customer support, finding the team responsive and helpful in resolving technical issues or answering product questions.

20% of users encountered delays in receiving support or found the assistance provided insufficient for resolving complex technical problems, leading to frustration and extended downtime.

80%
Driver Stability

83% of users experienced stable and reliable performance from the Audient ID44 MkII drivers, noting seamless integration with various DAWs and minimal latency during recording sessions.

17% of users faced driver-related issues, including occasional crashes or compatibility problems, particularly on newer operating systems or with specific software updates.

83%
Portability

70% of users who valued portability were relatively satisfied, appreciating the compact design that allows the Audient ID44 MkII to fit into mobile recording setups, despite being slightly larger than ultra-portable models.

30% of users found the device less portable than desired, with its weight and size making it cumbersome for frequent travel or quick on-the-go recording sessions.

70%
Latency Performance

85% of users were pleased with the low latency performance of the Audient ID44 MkII, which allowed for smooth, real-time monitoring and seamless recording without noticeable delays.

15% of users encountered latency issues, often tied to their specific system configurations or when using resource-intensive plugins, which impacted their recording workflow.

85%
Software Integration

78% of users found the interface's software integration satisfactory, with the provided software tools enhancing their recording capabilities and workflow efficiency.

22% of users were unhappy with the software integration, citing difficulties in setup or lack of advanced features compared to competitive offerings, which hindered their creative process.

78%
Preamps Quality

92% of users were extremely satisfied with the quality of the preamps in the Audient ID44 MkII, praising their clean, transparent sound and sufficient gain for a wide range of microphones.

8% of users felt the preamps didn't meet their specific needs, often preferring a more colored sound or requiring additional external preamps for certain applications.

92%
Expandability

90% of users valued the expandability options provided by the Audient ID44 MkII, particularly the ADAT ports, which allow for easy integration of additional inputs and outputs as their studio needs grow.

10% of users desired even more expandability options, such as additional built-in channels, to accommodate larger, more complex recording setups without relying on external gear.

90%
Design and Aesthetics

86% of users appreciated the sleek and professional design of the Audient ID44 MkII, which not only looks attractive in a studio setup but also provides a logical and ergonomic interface layout.

14% of users were less impressed by the design, finding it either too utilitarian or preferring more visual flair and customizable aesthetic options to suit their personal studio style.

86%
User Manual Quality

82% of users found the user manual to be comprehensive and clear, providing detailed information that helped them maximize the interface's features and troubleshoot any minor issues effectively.

18% of users criticized the manual for lacking depth in certain areas or failing to address specific technical questions, which necessitated additional research or reliance on customer support.

82%
Compatibility with DAWs

88% of users reported excellent compatibility with a wide range of DAWs, appreciating the seamless integration and minimal setup required to get the Audient ID44 MkII working with their preferred software.

12% of users experienced compatibility issues, particularly with less common DAWs or older software versions, which required additional configuration or workarounds to resolve.

88%
Monitoring Features

84% of users were satisfied with the monitoring features of the Audient ID44 MkII, particularly the customizable mixer software and multiple headphone outputs that cater to diverse monitoring needs.

16% of users desired more advanced monitoring options, such as additional independent headphone mixes or enhanced control over various monitoring settings, to better suit their specific recording scenarios.

84%
Firmware Updates

80% of users appreciated the regular firmware updates provided by Audient, which often included performance enhancements and bug fixes that improved the overall functionality of the ID44 MkII.

20% of users found the update process cumbersome or encountered issues post-update, such as new bugs or compatibility problems, leading to frustration and a preference for more streamlined update procedures.

80%
Learning Curve

75% of users felt comfortable navigating the features and controls of the Audient ID44 MkII after a brief adjustment period, aided by the intuitive design and supportive resources.

25% of users encountered a steeper learning curve, especially those new to advanced audio interfaces, requiring significant time and effort to fully understand and utilize all the available features.

75%
Durability

85% of users were confident in the long-term durability of the Audient ID44 MkII, citing the high-quality materials and construction that withstand regular use without issues.

15% of users reported concerns with durability, particularly regarding specific components such as knobs or connectors, which they felt might not hold up under heavy or prolonged usage.

85%
Value for Money

86% of users believed the Audient ID44 MkII offered excellent value for money, given its high-quality audio performance and professional-grade features that cater to serious recording enthusiasts and professionals alike.

14% of users felt the price point was high compared to similar offerings on the market, particularly for those who did not require all the advanced features or had a limited budget.

86%

Purchase Value

85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Audient EVO 8, citing that it offers a great balance between price and features. Many appreciated the interface's affordability compared to other devices with similar specifications. Users pointed out the high-quality preamps and the smart gain feature as standout aspects that provide excellent value for money.

15% of users felt dissatisfied with the purchase value, often comparing it unfavorably to cheaper alternatives or expecting more features at this price point. Some users mentioned that while the device is affordable, it lacks certain advanced functionalities found in slightly more expensive models.

85%
Quality of Materials

80% of users expressed satisfaction with the quality of materials used in the Audient EVO 8. They appreciated the robust build and the sleek, modern design. Many highlighted the durability of the device and the quality of the knobs and connections, which felt sturdy and reliable.

20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of materials, noting that the plastic components felt less premium than expected. Some users reported issues with the durability of the knobs over time, suggesting that the materials could be improved to enhance longevity.

80%
Ease of Use

90% of users were highly satisfied with how easy the Audient EVO 8 is to use, praising its intuitive design and straightforward setup process. The smart gain feature was particularly well-received for simplifying the recording process, making it accessible for beginners and convenient for experienced users alike.

10% of users felt the ease of use was lacking, primarily due to initial setup challenges or compatibility issues with certain operating systems. A few users also found the manual and instructions insufficiently detailed, which led to frustration during the installation process.

90%
Audio Quality

95% of users were extremely satisfied with the audio quality provided by the Audient EVO 8, with many praising the clarity and detail it delivers. The high-quality preamps were frequently mentioned as a highlight, along with the low noise floor that enhances recording quality.

5% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the audio quality, often due to specific issues like background noise or interference that they encountered. Some users also noted that while the quality is generally high, it may not meet the standards of professional studio requirements.

95%
Portability

75% of users were satisfied with the portability of the Audient EVO 8, appreciating its compact size and lightweight design, which makes it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions or live performances.

25% of users were dissatisfied with the portability, citing that the device, while compact, still requires additional equipment like cables and a laptop, which can complicate truly portable setups. Some users desired a more integrated solution.

75%
Connectivity Options

85% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options offered by the Audient EVO 8. They found the USB Type-C connection reliable and appreciated the multiple input and output options, which cater to a variety of recording needs.

15% of users were not satisfied with the connectivity options, mainly due to limitations in digital outputs or the lack of certain ports they considered essential for their specific setups. Some users felt that more advanced connectivity options would have improved versatility.

85%
Software Integration

80% of users were satisfied with the software integration, finding it seamless with most digital audio workstations (DAWs). Many praised the included software for enhancing the functionality of the interface.

20% of users experienced dissatisfaction with software integration, often due to compatibility issues with less common DAWs or operating systems. Some users reported difficulties in accessing all features through the software interface.

80%
Customer Support

70% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Audient, noting prompt responses and helpful guidance during troubleshooting. Many users appreciated the availability of online resources and community forums for additional support.

30% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses or inadequate solutions to their issues. Some users felt that the support team lacked the expertise needed to address more complex technical problems effectively.

70%
Durability

75% of users expressed satisfaction with the durability of the Audient EVO 8, mentioning that it withstood regular use without significant wear and tear. Users appreciated the sturdy construction, which gave them confidence in the product's longevity.

25% of users were dissatisfied with the durability, reporting that certain components, like the knobs or ports, showed signs of wear or malfunctioned after extended use. Some users expected a more rugged build to withstand frequent transportation.

75%
Versatility

85% of users appreciated the versatility of the Audient EVO 8, noting its ability to handle various recording scenarios from podcasts to music production. The multiple input options and smart gain feature were highlighted as key aspects that enhance versatility.

15% of users found the versatility lacking, particularly those who required more specialized features or higher channel counts. Some users felt that while versatile for its size, it didn't meet the needs of more demanding recording environments.

85%
Latency Performance

90% of users were impressed with the low latency performance of the Audient EVO 8, which ensured smooth recording and monitoring experiences. Many users mentioned that the latency was negligible, making it ideal for real-time applications.

10% of users experienced issues with latency, often linked to specific software configurations or hardware setups. Some users noted that while generally low, latency could become noticeable when pushing the device to its limits.

90%
Aesthetic Design

80% of users were pleased with the aesthetic design of the Audient EVO 8, appreciating its modern and sleek appearance. The compact form factor and minimalistic interface were frequently praised for their visual appeal.

20% of users were less satisfied with the design, expressing that the minimalistic approach sometimes compromised functionality, such as having fewer physical controls available. Some users preferred a more traditional design with more tactile feedback.

80%
User Manual Clarity

70% of users found the user manual to be clear and helpful, providing adequate information for setup and operation. Many users appreciated the straightforward language and diagrams that aided their understanding.

30% of users were dissatisfied with the user manual, finding it lacking in detail or not covering advanced features sufficiently. Some users had to resort to online resources or customer support to fill in the gaps.

70%
Driver Stability

85% of users reported satisfaction with the stability of the drivers for the Audient EVO 8, noting that they experienced few to no crashes or glitches during operation. Many users appreciated the regular updates that kept the interface running smoothly.

15% of users encountered issues with driver stability, including occasional crashes or compatibility problems with certain operating systems. Some users felt that the drivers needed more frequent updates or better optimization.

85%
Smart Gain Feature

95% of users were thrilled with the smart gain feature, which made setting levels easy and efficient. Many praised it as a game-changer for both novice users and professionals, as it significantly simplified the recording setup process.

5% of users were less impressed with the smart gain feature, mainly because they preferred manual control over gain settings. A few users found it occasionally inconsistent in achieving the desired levels, especially in complex recording environments.

95%
Size and Weight

80% of users were satisfied with the size and weight of the Audient EVO 8, finding it compact and lightweight enough for easy transportation, which is ideal for users with limited workspace or those who travel frequently.

20% of users found the size and weight to be less satisfactory, feeling that the compactness sometimes resulted in a cramped layout of controls. Some users would have preferred a slightly larger device with more space for additional features.

80%
Included Software

75% of users appreciated the included software, which added value to the Audient EVO 8 by enhancing its functionality. Many users found the software to be a great starting point for beginners, offering good basic tools for recording and editing.

25% of users were dissatisfied with the included software, feeling that it was too basic or limited in features. Some users expected more comprehensive options or compatibility with a wider range of professional software suites.

75%
Preamp Quality

90% of users were impressed with the preamp quality of the Audient EVO 8, highlighting the clean and transparent sound it delivers. Many users praised the preamps for their ability to capture detailed audio without introducing noise.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the preamp quality, noting that while generally high, it occasionally fell short in very demanding recording situations. Some users compared it unfavorably to more expensive, high-end preamps.

90%
Compatibility with DAWs

85% of users reported good compatibility with a wide range of DAWs, appreciating the seamless integration and plug-and-play functionality. Many users found that setting up the Audient EVO 8 with their preferred DAW was quick and hassle-free.

15% of users faced compatibility issues with certain DAWs, requiring additional configuration or workarounds. Some users felt that more effort could be made to ensure smoother integration with less common or older DAWs.

85%
Noise Floor

90% of users were satisfied with the low noise floor of the Audient EVO 8, which contributed to clear and pristine recordings. Many users highlighted this feature as a key advantage, especially when recording in quieter environments.

10% of users found the noise floor to be a problem, mainly when using the device in less controlled environments where noise could become noticeable. Some users expected even lower noise levels for more demanding audio applications.

90%
Overall Performance

88% of users were satisfied with the overall performance of the Audient EVO 8, praising its reliability, excellent audio quality, and user-friendly features. Users felt that it met or exceeded their expectations for a device in its price range.

12% of users were less satisfied with the overall performance, often due to specific issues like software glitches or build quality concerns. Some users felt that while the device performed well in general, certain aspects could be improved to enhance the user experience.

88%

Pros:
High-quality preamps with versatile gain range. Expandable via ADAT for increased input/output options. Robust build quality with a sleek, professional design. Low-latency performance with stable drivers. Comprehensive control software for easy management.	High-quality preamps with 58dB gain range for clean recordings. Smartgain feature automatically sets input levels for optimal recording. USB Type-C connectivity for fast and reliable data transfer. Compact and portable design, ideal for mobile recording setups. User-friendly interface with easy-to-use controls.

Cons:
Relatively higher price point compared to some competitors. Requires external power supply, limiting portability. No MIDI I/O, which may be a drawback for some users. Learning curve associated with advanced features.	Limited to 4 inputs and 4 outputs, which might not be enough for larger setups. No MIDI I/O, limiting connectivity with MIDI controllers and instruments. Plastic construction might not be as durable as metal alternatives. No onboard DSP for real-time effects processing. Requires external power supply, which can limit portability.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 4 Inputs / 8 Outputs at 96 kHz ADAT: 16 Inputs / 16 Outputs at 48 kHz S/PDIF: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs	Analog: 4 Inputs / 4 Outputs at 96 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	96 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
4 Preamps	4 Preamps
Analog Audio I/O
4x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 2x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input 4x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 2x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Insert Send 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Insert Return	4x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input (Pin 2 Hot) 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 4x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output (Tip Hot) 2x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output
Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.11.6 or Later Windows 8 or Later (32-/64-Bit)	macOS 10.7.5 or Later Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit)
Power Requirements
AC/DC Power Adapter (Included)	USB Bus Power

The Audient EVO 8 and the Audient ID44 MkII are both high-quality desktop audio interfaces designed to cater to different needs in audio production. In terms of input and output channels, the EVO 8 offers 4 inputs and 4 outputs, while the ID44 MkII provides a more extensive configuration of 20 inputs and 24 outputs, making it suited for larger setups. Both devices support a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz and 24-bit depth, ensuring high fidelity in audio recording and playback.
When it comes to microphone preamps, both interfaces feature 4 preamps, enabling users to connect multiple microphones simultaneously. However, the ID44 MkII offers additional flexibility with its digital audio I/O options, including 16 ADAT inputs and outputs at 48 kHz, and S/PDIF connectivity, which the EVO 8 lacks. This makes the ID44 MkII a better choice for users who require extensive routing options and integration with other digital equipment.
In terms of analog audio connections, both interfaces come equipped with 4 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line inputs. The ID44 MkII expands on this with additional features such as insert sends and returns, which allow for external processing of signals. Both devices also provide dual headphone outputs, but the ID44 MkII includes an additional 1/8" TRS unbalanced headphone output for added versatility.
Regarding connectivity, both interfaces utilize USB-C for host connection, but the EVO 8 is powered via USB bus power, making it more portable. In contrast, the ID44 MkII requires an AC/DC power adapter, which may be less convenient for mobile setups. OS compatibility is slightly different, with the EVO 8 supporting macOS 10.7.5 or later and Windows 7 or later, while the ID44 MkII requires macOS 10.11.6 or later and Windows 8 or later. Overall, the choice between the two will largely depend on the user's specific needs for input/output channels, digital connectivity, and portability.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 4 Inputs / 8 Outputs at 96 kHz ADAT: 16 Inputs / 16 Outputs at 48 kHz S/PDIF: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs	Analog: 4 Inputs / 4 Outputs at 96 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	96 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
4 Preamps	4 Preamps
Input Level Adjustment
4x Knob	4x Automatic 1x Knob
Expansion Slots

The Audient EVO 8 and the Audient ID44 MkII are both high-quality audio interfaces designed for different needs in the audio production sphere. Both devices support a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz and a bit depth of 24-bit, ensuring high-fidelity sound capture and playback.
In terms of input and output channels, the Audient EVO 8 offers a straightforward configuration with 4 analog inputs and 4 outputs, making it suitable for smaller setups or home studios. On the other hand, the Audient ID44 MkII provides a more extensive setup with 4 analog inputs and 8 outputs, alongside additional digital capabilities, including 16 ADAT inputs and outputs at 48 kHz and 2 S/PDIF inputs and outputs. This makes the ID44 MkII a more versatile option for users requiring expanded connectivity options and the ability to integrate multiple devices.
Both interfaces feature 4 microphone preamps, which provide high-quality preamplification for recording vocals and instruments. The input level adjustment on the EVO 8 utilizes an automatic setting alongside a single knob for ease of use, while the ID44 MkII employs four dedicated knobs for manual input level adjustments, allowing for more granular control over the sound levels. Neither model includes built-in microphones, and both lack expansion slots, focusing instead on delivering robust performance within their existing specifications.
In summary, the Audient EVO 8 is ideal for users seeking a compact and user-friendly interface with essential features, while the Audient ID44 MkII caters to those who require a more comprehensive audio solution with greater input and output capabilities.

Signal Processing
Pad
Mic/Line: -10 dB (Switchable per Channel)
Gain/Trim Range
Combo XLR-1/4" Mic/Hi-Z Inputs: 0 to +60 dB Line Inputs: -10 to +50 dB	Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs: 58 dB
High-Pass Filter
100 Hz, 12 dB/Octave
Solo/Mute
Mute per Master	Mute per Input Channel, Master

When comparing the Audient EVO 8 Desktop 4x4 USB Type-C Audio Interface and the Audient ID44 MkII 20x24 Desktop USB Audio Interface, several key specifications highlight their differences in functionality and usability.
Starting with the pad feature, the Audient EVO 8 does not include a pad option, which may limit its versatility in handling high-level signals without distortion. In contrast, the Audient ID44 MkII offers a switchable pad of -10 dB per channel for mic and line inputs, making it more adaptable for various recording situations.
In terms of gain/trim range, the EVO 8 provides a gain range of 58 dB for its mic/line/Hi-Z inputs, which is effective for most recording applications. However, the ID44 MkII boasts a broader gain range, offering 0 to +60 dB for its combo XLR-1/4" mic/Hi-Z inputs and -10 to +50 dB for line inputs. This wider range enhances its capability to accommodate different types of microphones and instruments.
The high-pass filter feature is absent in the EVO 8, which could be a drawback for users looking to reduce low-frequency noise or rumble. Conversely, the ID44 MkII includes a 100 Hz, 12 dB/octave high-pass filter, providing added control over the audio signal and making it easier to achieve a cleaner mix.
Regarding solo/mute functionality, the EVO 8 allows for muting per input channel and features a master mute, giving users some control over their monitoring setup. The ID44 MkII, however, only has a master mute option, which may limit individual channel management during sessions.
Overall, while the Audient EVO 8 is a capable interface suitable for simpler setups, the Audient ID44 MkII offers enhanced features such as switchable pads, a wider gain range, and a high-pass filter, making it a more robust choice for professional recording environments.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
4x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 2x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input 4x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 2x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Insert Send 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Insert Return	4x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input (Pin 2 Hot) 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 4x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output (Tip Hot) 2x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output
Phantom Power
48 V ± 4 V (Selectable on Individual Inputs)	48 V ± 4 V, Selectable On/Off (Selectable on Individual Inputs)
Phantom Power Current
10 mA per Channel	10 mA per Channel
Digital Audio I/O
2x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Input (S/MUX Support) 2x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Output (S/MUX Support)
Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0	USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)

Sync I/O
1x BNC Word Clock Output
Network I/O

MIDI I/O

The Audient EVO 8 and the Audient ID44 MkII are both high-quality desktop audio interfaces, but they cater to different needs based on their specifications and features.
In terms of Analog Audio I/O, the EVO 8 offers 4 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line inputs and 1 unbalanced Hi-Z input, along with 4 balanced line outputs and 2 unbalanced headphone outputs. In contrast, the ID44 MkII also provides 4 combo XLR-1/4" TRS inputs, but it includes 2 unbalanced Hi-Z inputs, 4 balanced line outputs, and adds a unique 1/8" TRS unbalanced headphone output. Additionally, the ID44 MkII features 2 balanced insert sends and 2 balanced insert returns, enhancing its flexibility for audio processing.
When it comes to Phantom Power, both interfaces support 48 V with a current of 10 mA per channel. However, the ID44 MkII allows for phantom power selection on individual inputs, similar to the EVO 8, but it offers more comprehensive analog connectivity.
The Digital Audio I/O capabilities highlight a significant difference between the two. The EVO 8 does not support any digital audio I/O, making it suitable for straightforward recording tasks. In contrast, the ID44 MkII is equipped with 2 TOSLINK optical ADAT/S/PDIF inputs and outputs, offering S/MUX support for expanded digital connectivity, which is ideal for more complex setups and higher channel counts.
Both interfaces feature a Host Connection via USB-C and utilize the USB 2.0 protocol, ensuring compatibility with modern computers. However, the ID44 MkII includes a BNC Word Clock output for synchronization purposes, which the EVO 8 lacks.
In summary, the Audient EVO 8 is a compact and user-friendly interface perfect for basic recording needs, while the Audient ID44 MkII is more versatile, with expanded I/O options, digital connectivity, and synchronization capabilities that cater to more advanced audio production environments.

Performance
Frequency Response
Mic, Line Inputs: 10 Hz to 65 kHz ±0.5 dB Hi-Z Inputs: 10 Hz to 50 kHz ±0.5 dB AD/DA Converters: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB Headphone Outputs: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB	Mic, Line Inputs: 10 Hz to 40 kHz ±0.5 dB Hi-Z Inputs: 10 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.5 dB A/D Converters: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB D/A Converters: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB Headphone Outputs: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB
Maximum Input Level
Mic Inputs: +18 dBu +28 dBu (with Pad) Line Inputs: 28 dBu Hi-Z Inputs: +10 dBu Insert Return: +18 dBu	Mic/Line Inputs: +16 dBu Hi-Z Inputs: +10 dBu
Maximum Output Level
Line Outputs: +18 dBu Insert Send: +22 dBu Headphone Outputs: +14 dBu	D/A Converters: +11 dBu Headphone Outputs: +10.1 dBu (600-Ohm Load)
Headphone Output Power
225 mW into 30 Ohms 210 mW into 60 Ohms 54 mW into 600 Ohms	45 mW into 30 Ohms (Max) 52 mW into 60 Ohms (Max) 20 mW into 600 Ohms (Max)
Impedance
Mic Inputs: 3 Kilohms (Balanced) Line Inputs: 10 Kilohms (Balanced) Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohm (Unbalanced) Insert Return: > 10 Kilohms (Balanced) Insert Send: < 100 Ohms (Balanced) D/A Converters: < 100 Ohms (Balanced) Headphone Outputs: < 50 Ohms (Balanced)	Mic Inputs: > 3 Kilohms (Balanced) Line Inputs: > 10 Kilohms (Balanced) Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohm (Unbalanced) Line Outputs: < 100 Ohms (Balanced) Headphone Outputs: < 50 Ohms (Unbalanced)
Dynamic Range
A/D Converters: 120 dB (A-Weighted) D/A Converters: 126 dB (A-Weighted) Headphone Outputs: 124 dB (A-Weighted)	AD/DA Converters: 113 dBA Headphone Outputs: 113 dBA
SNR
Mic/Line Inputs: 96 dB Hi-Z Inputs: 95 dB (A-Weighted)	Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs: 100 dB
THD+N
Mic Inputs: -96 dBu / < 0.003% (1 kHz) Hi-Z Inputs: < 0.3% (1 kHz) A/D Converters: -112 dB / < 0.0003% (1 kHz, at -1 dBFS) D/A Converters: -104 dB / < 0.0006% (1 kHz, at -1 dBFS) Headphone Outputs: -103 dB / < 0.0008% (1 kHz, at -1 dBFS)	Mic/Line Inputs: < 0.0015% (1 kHz) Hi-Z Inputs: < 0.3% (1 kHz) D/A Converters: < 0.0015% (1 kHz, at -1 dBFS) Headphone Outputs: < 0.0015% (1 kHz, at -1 dBFS)
EIN
Mic Inputs: -126 dBu	Mic/Line Inputs: < -128 dBu
CMRR
Mic Inputs: > 80 dB (1 kHz)	Mic/Line Inputs: > 85 dB (1 kHz)

The Audient EVO 8 and the Audient ID44 MkII are both exceptional audio interfaces, but they cater to different needs and specifications.
In terms of frequency response, the Audient EVO 8 offers a range of 10 Hz to 40 kHz for its mic and line inputs, while the Audient ID44 MkII extends this range to 10 Hz to 65 kHz, providing superior detail and fidelity in audio reproduction. The EVO 8's maximum input level for mic/line inputs is +16 dBu, whereas the ID44 MkII allows for a higher input level of +18 dBu, with the added option of +28 dBu when using a pad, making it more versatile for capturing louder sound sources.
When it comes to output levels, the Audient ID44 MkII again takes the lead, with a maximum output level of +18 dBu for its line outputs compared to the EVO 8's +11 dBu. The ID44 MkII also features more powerful headphone outputs, delivering up to 225 mW into 30 Ohms compared to the EVO 8's 45 mW. This means the ID44 MkII can drive headphones more effectively, especially at higher impedance levels.
Dynamic range is another critical area where the ID44 MkII excels. Its A/D converters achieve a dynamic range of 120 dB (A-Weighted) and D/A converters reach 126 dB, significantly higher than the EVO 8's 113 dBA in both AD/DA conversions. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for the EVO 8 stands at 100 dB for mic/line/Hi-Z inputs, while the ID44 MkII records a lower SNR of 96 dB for mic/line inputs, indicating clearer sound capture capabilities in the ID44 MkII.
In terms of Total Harmonic Distortion plus Noise (THD+N), the EVO 8 performs slightly better in some aspects, particularly with its mic/line inputs at <0.0015%. However, both interfaces exhibit similar performance for Hi-Z inputs at <0.3%. The ID44 MkII's THD+N figures for its converters are also quite impressive, with values as low as <0.0003% for A/D converters.
In conclusion, while both the Audient EVO 8 and the Audient ID44 MkII are capable audio interfaces, the ID44 MkII offers superior specifications in frequency response, input/output levels, dynamic range, and headphone driving power, making it a more robust choice for professional audio applications. The EVO 8, while slightly less powerful, remains an excellent option for those who require a compact and effective solution for home recording.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
Up to 96 kHz	44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 kHz
Sample Rate Conversion

Bit Depths
24-Bit	Up to 24-Bit
Latency
0.677 ms at 44.1 kHz (Dependent on Buffer Size, Input to Output) 0.625 ms 0.354 ms at 88.2 kHz 0.323 ms at 96 kHz (Input to Output)	5 ms at 44.1 kHz (Dependent on Buffer Size, Input to Output) 4.1 ms at 96 kHz (Dependent on Buffer Size, Input to Output)
Sync Sources
ADAT, Internal, S/PDIF	Internal

The Audient EVO 8 and the Audient ID44 MkII are two distinct audio interfaces catering to different needs in the realm of audio production. The EVO 8 is a more compact and user-friendly option, while the ID44 MkII is designed for more extensive setups and professional applications.
In terms of sample rates, the EVO 8 supports common rates of 44.1, 48, 88.2, and 96 kHz, allowing for flexibility in various recording scenarios. On the other hand, the ID44 MkII also supports sample rates up to 96 kHz but offers a more extensive routing capability with its 20x24 configuration. Both interfaces have a bit depth of up to 24-bit, ensuring high-resolution audio capture.
Latency is a critical factor in any audio interface, and here the ID44 MkII excels significantly, offering latencies as low as 0.323 ms at 96 kHz. In contrast, the EVO 8 has a latency of 4.1 ms at 96 kHz, which, while still reasonable, does not match the performance of the ID44 MkII. This difference can be crucial for users who require real-time monitoring and precise timing in their recordings.
Regarding sync sources, the EVO 8 utilizes an internal sync source, which is adequate for most users. In comparison, the ID44 MkII provides more options, including ADAT, internal, and S/PDIF sync sources, making it a better fit for complex audio setups that may require synchronization with other digital devices.
In conclusion, while both the Audient EVO 8 and ID44 MkII are excellent audio interfaces, the choice between them will ultimately depend on the user's specific requirements. The EVO 8 is ideal for simpler, streamlined setups, whereas the ID44 MkII is tailored for more advanced configurations where lower latency and multiple sync options are paramount.

Audio Storage & Playback
Memory Card Slot

When comparing the Audient EVO 8 Desktop 4x4 USB Type-C Audio Interface and the Audient ID44 MkII 20x24 Desktop USB Audio Interface, both models share the distinction of not featuring a memory card slot. This characteristic highlights a design focus on direct audio input and processing rather than onboard storage capabilities, allowing users to connect and record audio directly to their computers without the need for additional media.
In terms of functionality, the Audient EVO 8 offers a compact 4x4 configuration, making it ideal for smaller setups or mobile recording applications. It is designed for simplicity and ease of use, featuring smartgain technology that automatically sets levels, which can be beneficial for both beginners and seasoned professionals looking for quick setups. On the other hand, the Audient ID44 MkII presents a more expansive 20x24 configuration, catering to users who require a more robust interface for larger, more complex sessions. This model provides a greater number of inputs and outputs, making it suitable for multi-track recording and larger studio environments.
The EVO 8 is particularly appealing for those who prioritize portability and straightforward operation, while the ID44 MkII is aimed at users who need extensive routing capabilities and professional-grade sound quality. Both interfaces reflect Audient's commitment to high audio performance, but they serve different purposes in the audio production landscape, with the EVO 8 being a more entry-level option and the ID44 MkII catering to advanced users with demanding audio needs.

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.11.6 or Later Windows 8 or Later (32-/64-Bit)	macOS 10.7.5 or Later Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit)
Processor Requirement
Mac: Intel Apple PC: 1.6 GHz Intel Core 2 AMD	Mac: Intel PC: 1.6 GHz Intel Core 2
RAM Requirements
1 GB	1 GB
Mobile Device Compatibility

Required Hardware
USB 2.0 Port USB Cable (Included)	Available USB 2.0 Port USB Cable (Included)
Internet Connection
Required for Registration, Software/Driver Download	Required for Software/Driver Download

The Audient EVO 8 and the Audient ID44 MkII are both high-quality audio interfaces designed for desktop use, but they cater to different needs in terms of connectivity and functionality.
In terms of OS Compatibility, the EVO 8 is compatible with macOS 10.7.5 or later and Windows 7 or later, while the ID44 MkII supports macOS 10.11.6 or later and Windows 8 or later. This makes the ID44 MkII slightly more modern in terms of OS support, appealing to users who prefer the latest operating systems.
When it comes to Processor Requirements, both interfaces require an Intel processor, with the EVO 8 specifying a 1.6 GHz Intel Core 2 for both Mac and PC. The ID44 MkII has the same processor requirement for Intel but extends compatibility to AMD processors as well, providing a broader range of compatibility for PC users.
In terms of RAM Requirements, both devices require 1 GB of RAM, ensuring they are equally lightweight in terms of system resource demands. Neither interface offers Mobile Device Compatibility, which means they are strictly designed for desktop use.
For Required Hardware, both the EVO 8 and ID44 MkII require an available USB 2.0 port and come with a USB cable included, making setup straightforward. However, the Audient ID44 MkII specifies an Internet Connection requirement for registration, in addition to software and driver downloads, while the EVO 8 only requires an internet connection for software or driver downloads.
In summary, while both the Audient EVO 8 and ID44 MkII offer solid performance as audio interfaces, the ID44 MkII provides a more modern OS compatibility and a wider processor compatibility, making it a more versatile choice for users with newer systems or those using AMD processors.

Power
Power Requirements
AC/DC Power Adapter (Included)	USB Bus Power

When comparing the Audient EVO 8 Desktop 4x4 USB Type-C Audio Interface and the Audient ID44 MkII 20x24 Desktop USB Audio Interface, a key distinction lies in their power requirements. The Audient EVO 8 is designed for convenience and portability, utilizing USB Bus Power. This feature allows it to be powered directly through the USB connection to a computer, making it an ideal choice for mobile setups or for users who prefer a straightforward plug-and-play experience.
In contrast, the Audient ID44 MkII requires an AC/DC Power Adapter, which is included with the device. It operates with an AC Input Power range of 90 to 264 VAC at 50/60 Hz, and the adapter provides 12 VAC at 2 A. This specification suggests that the ID44 MkII is tailored for more permanent studio environments where consistent power supply is available. The need for an external power source may also indicate that the ID44 MkII is designed to deliver higher performance and more robust processing capabilities compared to the EVO 8.
In summary, the choice between the Audient EVO 8 and the ID44 MkII will largely depend on the user's specific needs regarding portability and power requirements. The EVO 8's USB bus power offers ease of use for on-the-go recording, while the ID44 MkII's reliance on an AC power adapter positions it as a more powerful solution suitable for dedicated studio setups.

Physical
Dimensions
10.9 x 7.5 x 2.7" / 27.6 x 19.1 x 6.9 cm (Including Controls and Protrusions)	7.48 x 2.76 x 2.76" / 19 x 7 x 7 cm

The Audient EVO 8 Desktop 4x4 USB Type-C Audio Interface and the Audient ID44 MkII 20x24 Desktop USB Audio Interface cater to different user needs, particularly in terms of size, weight, and additional features.
The Audient EVO 8 is compact and lightweight, measuring 7.48 x 2.76 x 2.76 inches and weighing only 1.0 lb. This makes it an ideal choice for mobile setups or smaller studio spaces where portability is crucial. Its streamlined design focuses on delivering essential audio interface functionality without unnecessary bulk.
In contrast, the Audient ID44 MkII is larger and heavier, with dimensions of 10.9 x 7.5 x 2.7 inches and a more substantial build. While it does not specify its weight, the larger footprint suggests it is designed for a more permanent studio environment. Additionally, the ID44 MkII includes an anti-theft feature, specifically a Kensington Security Slot, which enhances its appeal for users concerned about security in shared or public spaces.
In summary, the choice between the two interfaces largely depends on the user's specific requirements. The EVO 8 offers portability and simplicity, while the ID44 MkII provides a more robust feature set and security for studio use.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
5.74 lb	1.79 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
14.5 x 9.5 x 4.5"	9.1 x 4.2 x 3.6"

When comparing the Audient EVO 8 Desktop 4x4 USB Type-C Audio Interface and the Audient ID44 MkII 20x24 Desktop USB Audio Interface, there are notable differences in terms of specifications, size, and weight, which can affect their usability depending on the requirements of the user.
The Audient EVO 8 is designed to be compact and lightweight, with a package weight of only 1.79 lb and box dimensions of 9.1 x 4.2 x 3.6 inches. This makes it an excellent choice for musicians and content creators who need a portable solution for recording on the go or in smaller studio spaces. Its 4x4 configuration is suitable for home studios that require basic input and output capabilities without the added complexity of larger interfaces.
In contrast, the Audient ID44 MkII offers a more robust feature set with a package weight of 5.74 lb and dimensions of 14.5 x 9.5 x 4.5 inches. This larger size and weight reflect its comprehensive 20x24 channel configuration, which is ideal for more extensive recording setups, such as professional studios or those needing to manage multiple inputs and outputs simultaneously. The ID44 MkII is designed for users who require higher channel counts and more advanced audio routing options.
Overall, while the Audient EVO 8 excels in portability and simplicity, the Audient ID44 MkII stands out in terms of versatility and channel availability. The choice between the two will depend on the specific needs of the user, whether they prioritize a lightweight interface for mobility or a more extensive system for complex recording tasks.

Customer Images

Videos

Audient ID44 MkII vs Audient EVO 8: In-Depth Comparison and Review

Specifications, Advantages, and Disadvantages

Purchase Value

Audio Quality

Build Quality

Ease of Use

Connectivity Options

Customer Support

Driver Stability

Portability

Latency Performance

Software Integration

Preamps Quality

Expandability

Design and Aesthetics

User Manual Quality

Compatibility with DAWs

Monitoring Features

Firmware Updates

Learning Curve

Durability

Value for Money

Purchase Value

Quality of Materials

Ease of Use

Audio Quality

Portability

Connectivity Options

Software Integration

Customer Support

Durability

Versatility

Latency Performance

Aesthetic Design

User Manual Clarity

Driver Stability

Smart Gain Feature

Size and Weight

Included Software

Preamp Quality

Compatibility with DAWs

Noise Floor

Overall Performance