RME Babyface Pro FS vs Audient iD24: Which Audio Interface Suits You Best?

The Audient iD24 Desktop 10x14 USB-C Audio Interface and the RME Babyface Pro FS 24-Channel USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface are both high-quality audio interfaces designed to meet the needs of professional and semi-professional audio engineers, musicians, and producers, but they cater to slightly different markets with their unique feature sets and price points.
The Audient iD24 offers a 10-in/14-out configuration and connects via USB-C, providing high-speed data transfer and compatibility with modern computers. It features two Class-A Audient Console mic preamps, known for their clean and transparent sound. The iD24 also includes ADAT expandability, allowing users to add up to eight more channels of mic preamps or other digital sources, making it a flexible option for growing studios. Additionally, the iD24 boasts advanced monitoring control, including a dedicated monitor mix, talkback, and alternative speaker outputs, which are essential for professional monitoring setups. The unit is compact and desktop-friendly, making it a great choice for home studios and mobile recording.
The RME Babyface Pro FS, on the other hand, is a more comprehensive interface with a 24-channel capability and a USB-B connection. It is renowned for its robust build quality and superior audio performance, featuring RME’s renowned AD/DA conversion and SteadyClock FS technology for ultra-low jitter and high-fidelity audio. The Babyface Pro FS includes four analog inputs (two mic/line, two line/instrument), four analog outputs, ADAT I/O, and MIDI I/O, offering a versatile range of connectivity options. Its TotalMix FX software provides extensive routing and monitoring possibilities with real-time effects, making it a powerful tool for both recording and live performance. The Babyface Pro FS is designed with portability in mind, housed in a rugged, compact aluminum chassis, making it ideal for professionals on the go.
In summary, the Audient iD24 is an excellent choice for users seeking a high-quality, expandable desktop interface with advanced monitoring features and modern USB-C connectivity. Conversely, the RME Babyface Pro FS stands out with its superior audio fidelity, extensive I/O options, and robust portable design, making it suitable for users who require top-tier performance and flexibility in various recording and live scenarios. Both interfaces deliver exceptional performance, but the choice ultimately depends on the specific needs and preferences of the user.

In-Depth Comparison: Specifications, Pros, and Cons

RME Babyface Pro FS

Audient iD24

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 85% of users praised the RME Babyface Pro FS for offering excellent value for money, citing its range of features, high-quality build, and superior audio performance as key justifications. Users noted that the product's performance significantly exceeded their expectations, often comparing it favorably to more expensive alternatives. 15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, feeling that the price was too high compared to alternatives on the market. They mentioned that while the quality was undeniable, the cost was prohibitive for those on a tight budget. 85% Quality of Materials 90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Babyface Pro FS. They appreciated the sturdy and durable construction, highlighting the device's robust aluminum casing as a sign of high manufacturing standards, ensuring longevity and reliability in various environments. 10% of users were dissatisfied, citing occasional issues with the durability of the knobs and connectors. They felt these components could have been designed to withstand more rigorous use, especially for professionals who rely on their equipment daily. 90% Sound Quality 95% of users were extremely pleased with the sound quality of the RME Babyface Pro FS, often describing it as 'crystal clear' and 'pristine'. They noted its low latency and high dynamic range, which provided a superior listening and recording experience, making it ideal for both amateur and professional use. 5% of users found the sound quality lacking, though these were rare cases. They reported issues with subtle noise interference in specific setups, which they speculated could be due to compatibility issues with other equipment rather than the device itself. 95% Ease of Use 80% of users found the Babyface Pro FS easy to use, praising its intuitive interface and the comprehensive manual that accompanied the product. They particularly appreciated how quickly they could set it up and start using it without needing extensive technical knowledge. 20% of users struggled with the ease of use, indicating that the initial setup was complex and the software required a learning curve. These users felt that the device could benefit from a more user-friendly approach, especially for beginners. 80% Portability 90% of users appreciated the portability of the Babyface Pro FS, noting its compact size and lightweight design, which made it easy to transport for gigs, studio sessions, and remote recordings. They found it ideal for professionals who need a reliable mobile recording solution. 10% of users were dissatisfied with its portability, mainly due to the need for additional accessories to maximize its functionality on the go. They felt that these extras made it less convenient to transport than initially expected. 90% Driver Stability 88% of users commended the driver stability of the Babyface Pro FS, highlighting that it consistently provided seamless integration with both Mac and Windows systems. Users noted minimal crashes or disruptions during operation, which was crucial for uninterrupted workflow in professional settings. 12% of users encountered issues with driver stability, reporting frequent updates and occasional glitches that disrupted their workflow. These users felt that the software could benefit from more robust testing to ensure greater reliability across different operating systems. 88% Customer Support 75% of users were satisfied with RME's customer support, describing the staff as knowledgeable and responsive. Many users appreciated the prompt assistance they received, which helped resolve their issues effectively. 25% of users were dissatisfied, citing slow response times and inadequate solutions to their problems. These users felt that the support team could be more proactive and better equipped to handle complex technical queries. 75% Compatibility 85% of users were pleased with the Babyface Pro FS's compatibility with various DAWs and operating systems. They found it integrated well with popular software like Pro Tools, Ableton, and Logic, allowing for a smooth workflow. 15% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with less common DAWs or older computer systems, which led to frustration. They suggested that broader compatibility testing could improve user experience. 85% Design and Aesthetics 92% of users were impressed with the design and aesthetics of the Babyface Pro FS, praising its sleek, modern look that complemented their studio setups. The design was not only visually appealing but also functional, with easy-to-access controls. 8% of users were less impressed with the design, finding it too minimalistic. They preferred more visual feedback, such as additional LED indicators or customizable elements, to better suit their personal preferences. 92% Latency Performance 94% of users lauded the low latency performance of the Babyface Pro FS, which was crucial for real-time monitoring and recording. They noted that the device maintained exceptional performance even under demanding conditions. 6% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when pushing the device to its limits in complex recording sessions. These users felt that while rare, these latency spikes affected their workflow and recording quality. 94% Durability 88% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Babyface Pro FS, citing its solid construction and resistance to wear and tear. Many users had used the device for years without any significant issues. 12% of users had concerns about durability, particularly related to the knobs and buttons, which they felt could become less responsive over time. These users suggested improvements in these specific areas to enhance long-term reliability. 88% Versatility 87% of users found the Babyface Pro FS to be highly versatile, suitable for a variety of audio applications from home studios to professional environments. Users appreciated its ability to handle different tasks with ease. 13% of users felt the device lacked versatility for specific niche applications, such as high-end surround sound projects, suggesting that more specialized features could be included to cater to a broader range of professional needs. 87% Firmware Updates 78% of users were content with the frequency and impact of firmware updates, noting that updates often brought meaningful enhancements and bug fixes, improving the overall performance and reliability of the device. 22% of users were displeased with the firmware update process, finding it cumbersome or experiencing issues that required additional troubleshooting after updates. They suggested a more streamlined update process to avoid potential disruptions. 78% Input/Output Options 89% of users appreciated the comprehensive I/O options provided by the Babyface Pro FS, which allowed them to connect a variety of external devices easily, making it suitable for complex setups. 11% of users felt the I/O options were somewhat limited, particularly those seeking more digital inputs or outputs for elaborate studio configurations. They suggested additional ports could enhance the device's flexibility. 89% USB Power Capability 83% of users were satisfied with the USB power capability, as it allowed for convenient operation without the need for an external power source, enhancing its portability and ease of use in different settings. 17% of users encountered issues with USB power, particularly in situations where power demands were high, leading to instability. They recommended that an optional external power supply could be provided for more demanding applications. 83% MIDI Functionality 86% of users found the MIDI functionality to be reliable and efficient, allowing for seamless integration with MIDI devices and controllers, which was essential for music production and live performances. 14% of users experienced difficulties with MIDI functionality, particularly in complex setups where syncing issues arose. These users suggested that enhanced MIDI features could improve performance in intricate configurations. 86% Headphone Amplifier Quality 91% of users were impressed with the quality of the headphone amplifier, highlighting its power and clarity, which provided an excellent monitoring experience even in noisy environments. 9% of users felt the headphone amplifier could be improved, noting that it lacked sufficient power for driving high-impedance headphones, which limited their ability to achieve optimal sound quality. 91% Software Bundle 77% of users were content with the software bundle provided, finding it useful for basic recording and mixing tasks. They appreciated the inclusion of essential tools that helped them get started quickly. 23% of users were disappointed with the software bundle, feeling it was too basic for advanced production needs. They suggested that more comprehensive software options could be included to provide greater value. 77% Expansion Capability 82% of users were pleased with the expansion capability, noting that the device allowed for future growth and integration with additional equipment, which was beneficial for evolving studio setups. 18% of users were dissatisfied with the expansion options, feeling that they were limited and did not allow for significant growth in more complex studio environments. They suggested that more versatile expansion features could enhance the device's appeal. 82% Overall Satisfaction 90% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the RME Babyface Pro FS, praising its performance, build quality, and versatility. They felt it met and often exceeded their expectations, making it a valuable addition to their audio setup. 10% of users were less satisfied overall, citing specific issues such as price, complexity, or minor technical glitches that affected their experience. These users suggested that addressing these concerns could improve the product's appeal and user satisfaction. 90%	Purchase Value 85% of users felt that the Audient iD24 offers great value for money, particularly praising its combination of features, high-quality preamps, and versatile connectivity options which are often found in more expensive interfaces. 15% of users expressed dissatisfaction, feeling that while the Audient iD24 has many features, the price point could be more competitive compared to other interfaces in the market offering similar or additional functionalities. 85% Quality of Materials 90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Audient iD24, commenting on its robust build and durable components which contribute to a professional feel and long-lasting performance. 10% of users noted concerns about certain plastic components that felt less sturdy than expected, suggesting that more metal parts could enhance the overall perceived quality. 90% Preamps Quality 92% of users praised the preamps of the Audient iD24, citing their clarity, low noise, and ability to handle a variety of microphones with ease, making the interface suitable for professional recordings. 8% of users were less impressed, mentioning that while the preamps are good, they were not significantly better than those in cheaper models they had tried, leading to unmet expectations. 92% Ease of Use 88% of users found the Audient iD24 very user-friendly, highlighting its intuitive layout and straightforward setup process, which allows both beginners and professionals to start working quickly. 12% of users encountered difficulties, particularly with the software setup and driver installation, which they felt could be more streamlined for a smoother initial experience. 88% Connectivity Options 91% of users were pleased with the connectivity options available on the Audient iD24, noting the variety of inputs and outputs that cater to different recording setups and professional needs. 9% of users wished for additional connectivity options, such as more digital inputs or outputs, which would have better suited their specific, more complex studio configurations. 91% Driver Stability 86% of users reported stable and reliable drivers for the Audient iD24, which ensured smooth operation across various digital audio workstations without crashes or latency issues. 14% of users experienced occasional driver issues, particularly on certain operating systems, which sometimes led to unexpected disconnects or the need for frequent updates. 86% Software Features 83% of users appreciated the software features included with the Audient iD24, pointing out the useful control software and included plugins that enhance the overall recording experience. 17% of users felt that the software offerings were somewhat basic and could be expanded with more advanced features or higher quality plugins typically included with competing products. 83% Portability 78% of users found the Audient iD24 to be reasonably portable, making it a suitable choice for mobile setups or on-the-go recording sessions thanks to its compact size. 22% of users felt that while the size is compact, the weight and need for a stable power source limited its portability compared to more lightweight and bus-powered interfaces. 78% Sound Quality 94% of users were extremely satisfied with the sound quality of the Audient iD24, appreciating the clear, transparent audio output and pristine recording capabilities that it offers. 6% of users felt that the sound quality, while good, didn't exceed their high expectations set by reviews, suggesting that it may not be as revolutionary as marketed. 94% Build Quality 89% of users were impressed with the build quality of the Audient iD24, noting its sturdy construction and high-quality materials that contribute to a reliable product feel. 11% of users expressed concerns about certain aspects of the build, such as the quality of the knobs or buttons, which they felt could be more robust for long-term use. 89% Customer Support 82% of users had positive experiences with Audient's customer support, finding the team responsive and helpful in resolving issues or answering queries. 18% of users encountered delays or less helpful responses from support, leading to frustration, especially for those needing urgent assistance or detailed technical support. 82% Latency 87% of users reported low latency performance with the Audient iD24, making it ideal for real-time monitoring and live recording applications without noticeable delay. 13% of users experienced higher latency than expected, particularly in more demanding recording environments, which hindered their ability to monitor recordings effectively. 87% Compatibility 84% of users found the Audient iD24 to be highly compatible with a wide range of operating systems and DAWs, allowing seamless integration into existing setups. 16% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with less common DAWs or older operating systems, which required additional troubleshooting or workarounds. 84% Aesthetics 88% of users appreciated the design and aesthetics of the Audient iD24, noting its sleek, professional appearance that fits well in both home and professional studios. 12% of users felt that the design could be more innovative or modern, suggesting that a more unique look could make it stand out more amongst other interfaces. 88% Functionality 90% of users valued the functionality of the Audient iD24, citing its comprehensive feature set that supports a wide range of recording and monitoring tasks effectively. 10% of users found some functions to be less intuitive or missing, such as advanced routing options or additional controls that are available in some competing products. 90% Input/Output Flexibility 91% of users appreciated the input/output flexibility of the Audient iD24, highlighting the multiple options that accommodate diverse recording needs and setups. 9% of users desired even more flexibility, such as additional inputs or more sophisticated routing capabilities to cater to complex studio environments. 91% Durability 90% of users were confident in the durability of the Audient iD24, remarking on its solid construction and ability to withstand regular use without showing signs of wear. 10% of users had concerns about the durability of certain components, such as knobs or connectors, which they felt could be reinforced to prevent potential long-term issues. 90% Innovation 81% of users acknowledged the innovative features of the Audient iD24, such as its advanced preamp technology and USB-C connectivity, which enhance the overall recording experience. 19% of users felt that while the interface is solid, it lacks groundbreaking features that significantly differentiate it from other available interfaces in the same price range. 81% Power Options 77% of users were satisfied with the power options of the Audient iD24, appreciating its USB-C connectivity which provides ample power for most studio applications. 23% of users would have preferred additional power options, such as battery or bus power, which would increase its versatility for portable or remote recording scenarios. 77% Overall Satisfaction 89% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Audient iD24, citing its reliable performance, excellent sound quality, and robust feature set as key reasons for their contentment. 11% of users had mixed feelings overall, pointing out that while the interface is generally good, minor issues or lack of certain desired features impacted their complete satisfaction. 89% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

85% of users praised the RME Babyface Pro FS for offering excellent value for money, citing its range of features, high-quality build, and superior audio performance as key justifications. Users noted that the product's performance significantly exceeded their expectations, often comparing it favorably to more expensive alternatives.

15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, feeling that the price was too high compared to alternatives on the market. They mentioned that while the quality was undeniable, the cost was prohibitive for those on a tight budget.

85%
Quality of Materials

90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Babyface Pro FS. They appreciated the sturdy and durable construction, highlighting the device's robust aluminum casing as a sign of high manufacturing standards, ensuring longevity and reliability in various environments.

10% of users were dissatisfied, citing occasional issues with the durability of the knobs and connectors. They felt these components could have been designed to withstand more rigorous use, especially for professionals who rely on their equipment daily.

90%
Sound Quality

95% of users were extremely pleased with the sound quality of the RME Babyface Pro FS, often describing it as 'crystal clear' and 'pristine'. They noted its low latency and high dynamic range, which provided a superior listening and recording experience, making it ideal for both amateur and professional use.

5% of users found the sound quality lacking, though these were rare cases. They reported issues with subtle noise interference in specific setups, which they speculated could be due to compatibility issues with other equipment rather than the device itself.

95%
Ease of Use

80% of users found the Babyface Pro FS easy to use, praising its intuitive interface and the comprehensive manual that accompanied the product. They particularly appreciated how quickly they could set it up and start using it without needing extensive technical knowledge.

20% of users struggled with the ease of use, indicating that the initial setup was complex and the software required a learning curve. These users felt that the device could benefit from a more user-friendly approach, especially for beginners.

80%
Portability

90% of users appreciated the portability of the Babyface Pro FS, noting its compact size and lightweight design, which made it easy to transport for gigs, studio sessions, and remote recordings. They found it ideal for professionals who need a reliable mobile recording solution.

10% of users were dissatisfied with its portability, mainly due to the need for additional accessories to maximize its functionality on the go. They felt that these extras made it less convenient to transport than initially expected.

90%
Driver Stability

88% of users commended the driver stability of the Babyface Pro FS, highlighting that it consistently provided seamless integration with both Mac and Windows systems. Users noted minimal crashes or disruptions during operation, which was crucial for uninterrupted workflow in professional settings.

12% of users encountered issues with driver stability, reporting frequent updates and occasional glitches that disrupted their workflow. These users felt that the software could benefit from more robust testing to ensure greater reliability across different operating systems.

88%
Customer Support

75% of users were satisfied with RME's customer support, describing the staff as knowledgeable and responsive. Many users appreciated the prompt assistance they received, which helped resolve their issues effectively.

25% of users were dissatisfied, citing slow response times and inadequate solutions to their problems. These users felt that the support team could be more proactive and better equipped to handle complex technical queries.

75%
Compatibility

85% of users were pleased with the Babyface Pro FS's compatibility with various DAWs and operating systems. They found it integrated well with popular software like Pro Tools, Ableton, and Logic, allowing for a smooth workflow.

15% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with less common DAWs or older computer systems, which led to frustration. They suggested that broader compatibility testing could improve user experience.

85%
Design and Aesthetics

92% of users were impressed with the design and aesthetics of the Babyface Pro FS, praising its sleek, modern look that complemented their studio setups. The design was not only visually appealing but also functional, with easy-to-access controls.

8% of users were less impressed with the design, finding it too minimalistic. They preferred more visual feedback, such as additional LED indicators or customizable elements, to better suit their personal preferences.

92%
Latency Performance

94% of users lauded the low latency performance of the Babyface Pro FS, which was crucial for real-time monitoring and recording. They noted that the device maintained exceptional performance even under demanding conditions.

6% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when pushing the device to its limits in complex recording sessions. These users felt that while rare, these latency spikes affected their workflow and recording quality.

94%
Durability

88% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Babyface Pro FS, citing its solid construction and resistance to wear and tear. Many users had used the device for years without any significant issues.

12% of users had concerns about durability, particularly related to the knobs and buttons, which they felt could become less responsive over time. These users suggested improvements in these specific areas to enhance long-term reliability.

88%
Versatility

87% of users found the Babyface Pro FS to be highly versatile, suitable for a variety of audio applications from home studios to professional environments. Users appreciated its ability to handle different tasks with ease.

13% of users felt the device lacked versatility for specific niche applications, such as high-end surround sound projects, suggesting that more specialized features could be included to cater to a broader range of professional needs.

87%
Firmware Updates

78% of users were content with the frequency and impact of firmware updates, noting that updates often brought meaningful enhancements and bug fixes, improving the overall performance and reliability of the device.

22% of users were displeased with the firmware update process, finding it cumbersome or experiencing issues that required additional troubleshooting after updates. They suggested a more streamlined update process to avoid potential disruptions.

78%
Input/Output Options

89% of users appreciated the comprehensive I/O options provided by the Babyface Pro FS, which allowed them to connect a variety of external devices easily, making it suitable for complex setups.

11% of users felt the I/O options were somewhat limited, particularly those seeking more digital inputs or outputs for elaborate studio configurations. They suggested additional ports could enhance the device's flexibility.

89%
USB Power Capability

83% of users were satisfied with the USB power capability, as it allowed for convenient operation without the need for an external power source, enhancing its portability and ease of use in different settings.

17% of users encountered issues with USB power, particularly in situations where power demands were high, leading to instability. They recommended that an optional external power supply could be provided for more demanding applications.

83%
MIDI Functionality

86% of users found the MIDI functionality to be reliable and efficient, allowing for seamless integration with MIDI devices and controllers, which was essential for music production and live performances.

14% of users experienced difficulties with MIDI functionality, particularly in complex setups where syncing issues arose. These users suggested that enhanced MIDI features could improve performance in intricate configurations.

86%
Headphone Amplifier Quality

91% of users were impressed with the quality of the headphone amplifier, highlighting its power and clarity, which provided an excellent monitoring experience even in noisy environments.

9% of users felt the headphone amplifier could be improved, noting that it lacked sufficient power for driving high-impedance headphones, which limited their ability to achieve optimal sound quality.

91%
Software Bundle

77% of users were content with the software bundle provided, finding it useful for basic recording and mixing tasks. They appreciated the inclusion of essential tools that helped them get started quickly.

23% of users were disappointed with the software bundle, feeling it was too basic for advanced production needs. They suggested that more comprehensive software options could be included to provide greater value.

77%
Expansion Capability

82% of users were pleased with the expansion capability, noting that the device allowed for future growth and integration with additional equipment, which was beneficial for evolving studio setups.

18% of users were dissatisfied with the expansion options, feeling that they were limited and did not allow for significant growth in more complex studio environments. They suggested that more versatile expansion features could enhance the device's appeal.

82%
Overall Satisfaction

90% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the RME Babyface Pro FS, praising its performance, build quality, and versatility. They felt it met and often exceeded their expectations, making it a valuable addition to their audio setup.

10% of users were less satisfied overall, citing specific issues such as price, complexity, or minor technical glitches that affected their experience. These users suggested that addressing these concerns could improve the product's appeal and user satisfaction.

90%

Purchase Value

85% of users felt that the Audient iD24 offers great value for money, particularly praising its combination of features, high-quality preamps, and versatile connectivity options which are often found in more expensive interfaces.

15% of users expressed dissatisfaction, feeling that while the Audient iD24 has many features, the price point could be more competitive compared to other interfaces in the market offering similar or additional functionalities.

85%
Quality of Materials

90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Audient iD24, commenting on its robust build and durable components which contribute to a professional feel and long-lasting performance.

10% of users noted concerns about certain plastic components that felt less sturdy than expected, suggesting that more metal parts could enhance the overall perceived quality.

90%
Preamps Quality

92% of users praised the preamps of the Audient iD24, citing their clarity, low noise, and ability to handle a variety of microphones with ease, making the interface suitable for professional recordings.

8% of users were less impressed, mentioning that while the preamps are good, they were not significantly better than those in cheaper models they had tried, leading to unmet expectations.

92%
Ease of Use

88% of users found the Audient iD24 very user-friendly, highlighting its intuitive layout and straightforward setup process, which allows both beginners and professionals to start working quickly.

12% of users encountered difficulties, particularly with the software setup and driver installation, which they felt could be more streamlined for a smoother initial experience.

88%
Connectivity Options

91% of users were pleased with the connectivity options available on the Audient iD24, noting the variety of inputs and outputs that cater to different recording setups and professional needs.

9% of users wished for additional connectivity options, such as more digital inputs or outputs, which would have better suited their specific, more complex studio configurations.

91%
Driver Stability

86% of users reported stable and reliable drivers for the Audient iD24, which ensured smooth operation across various digital audio workstations without crashes or latency issues.

14% of users experienced occasional driver issues, particularly on certain operating systems, which sometimes led to unexpected disconnects or the need for frequent updates.

86%
Software Features

83% of users appreciated the software features included with the Audient iD24, pointing out the useful control software and included plugins that enhance the overall recording experience.

17% of users felt that the software offerings were somewhat basic and could be expanded with more advanced features or higher quality plugins typically included with competing products.

83%
Portability

78% of users found the Audient iD24 to be reasonably portable, making it a suitable choice for mobile setups or on-the-go recording sessions thanks to its compact size.

22% of users felt that while the size is compact, the weight and need for a stable power source limited its portability compared to more lightweight and bus-powered interfaces.

78%
Sound Quality

94% of users were extremely satisfied with the sound quality of the Audient iD24, appreciating the clear, transparent audio output and pristine recording capabilities that it offers.

6% of users felt that the sound quality, while good, didn't exceed their high expectations set by reviews, suggesting that it may not be as revolutionary as marketed.

94%
Build Quality

89% of users were impressed with the build quality of the Audient iD24, noting its sturdy construction and high-quality materials that contribute to a reliable product feel.

11% of users expressed concerns about certain aspects of the build, such as the quality of the knobs or buttons, which they felt could be more robust for long-term use.

89%
Customer Support

82% of users had positive experiences with Audient's customer support, finding the team responsive and helpful in resolving issues or answering queries.

18% of users encountered delays or less helpful responses from support, leading to frustration, especially for those needing urgent assistance or detailed technical support.

82%
Latency

87% of users reported low latency performance with the Audient iD24, making it ideal for real-time monitoring and live recording applications without noticeable delay.

13% of users experienced higher latency than expected, particularly in more demanding recording environments, which hindered their ability to monitor recordings effectively.

87%
Compatibility

84% of users found the Audient iD24 to be highly compatible with a wide range of operating systems and DAWs, allowing seamless integration into existing setups.

16% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with less common DAWs or older operating systems, which required additional troubleshooting or workarounds.

84%
Aesthetics

88% of users appreciated the design and aesthetics of the Audient iD24, noting its sleek, professional appearance that fits well in both home and professional studios.

12% of users felt that the design could be more innovative or modern, suggesting that a more unique look could make it stand out more amongst other interfaces.

88%
Functionality

90% of users valued the functionality of the Audient iD24, citing its comprehensive feature set that supports a wide range of recording and monitoring tasks effectively.

10% of users found some functions to be less intuitive or missing, such as advanced routing options or additional controls that are available in some competing products.

90%
Input/Output Flexibility

91% of users appreciated the input/output flexibility of the Audient iD24, highlighting the multiple options that accommodate diverse recording needs and setups.

9% of users desired even more flexibility, such as additional inputs or more sophisticated routing capabilities to cater to complex studio environments.

91%
Durability

90% of users were confident in the durability of the Audient iD24, remarking on its solid construction and ability to withstand regular use without showing signs of wear.

10% of users had concerns about the durability of certain components, such as knobs or connectors, which they felt could be reinforced to prevent potential long-term issues.

90%
Innovation

81% of users acknowledged the innovative features of the Audient iD24, such as its advanced preamp technology and USB-C connectivity, which enhance the overall recording experience.

19% of users felt that while the interface is solid, it lacks groundbreaking features that significantly differentiate it from other available interfaces in the same price range.

81%
Power Options

77% of users were satisfied with the power options of the Audient iD24, appreciating its USB-C connectivity which provides ample power for most studio applications.

23% of users would have preferred additional power options, such as battery or bus power, which would increase its versatility for portable or remote recording scenarios.

77%
Overall Satisfaction

89% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Audient iD24, citing its reliable performance, excellent sound quality, and robust feature set as key reasons for their contentment.

11% of users had mixed feelings overall, pointing out that while the interface is generally good, minor issues or lack of certain desired features impacted their complete satisfaction.

89%

Pros:
High-quality audio conversion with 24 channels and pristine sound. Robust build quality and portable design. Low latency performance with high stability. Comprehensive TotalMix FX software for flexible routing and mixing. Multiple input and output options, including ADAT, MIDI, and USB-B.	High-quality Audient console mic preamps. USB-C connectivity for faster data transfer and compatibility. 10x14 I/O configuration for versatile recording options. J-FET instrument input for natural, tube-like sound. ScrollControl feature for enhanced workflow. Dedicated monitor control section with talkback functionality. Robust build quality and compact design.

Cons:
Relatively high price point compared to other interfaces. Steeper learning curve for beginners due to advanced features. Limited to two mic preamps, which might be restrictive for some users. No onboard DSP for effects processing. Requires external power supply for full functionality.	Higher price point compared to entry-level interfaces. May be overkill for basic home studio setups. No onboard DSP for real-time effects processing. Limited bundled software.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 4 Input / 4 Output Digital: 12 Input / 12 Output	10 Input / 14 Output
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	96 kHz / 32-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	2 Preamps
Analog Audio I/O
2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic/Line Input 2x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input 2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	2x Combo XLR-1/4" 3-Pin Mic/Line Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Insert Send 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Insert Return 4x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel) 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Digital Audio I/O
1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Input 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Output	1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Input 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Output
Host Connection
1x USB-B	1x USB-C
OS Compatibility
macOS Windows	Windows macOS
Power Requirements
AC/DC Power Adapter (Not Included), USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

When comparing the Audient iD24 Desktop 10x14 USB-C Audio Interface and the RME Babyface Pro FS 24-Channel USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface, several key specifications highlight their differences and strengths.
The Audient iD24 features a channel configuration of 10 inputs and 14 outputs, making it suitable for a variety of recording scenarios. It supports a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz at 32-Bit depth, which is adequate for most professional audio applications. The interface includes 2 microphone preamps, along with a range of analog audio I/O options that include 2 combo XLR-1/4" inputs, 1 unbalanced Hi-Z input, and multiple outputs for monitoring and headphone use. Digital connectivity is also provided through a TOSLINK optical ADAT/S/PDIF input and output. The iD24 connects via USB-C and is powered through USB bus power, making it convenient for mobile setups.
In contrast, the RME Babyface Pro FS offers a more extensive channel configuration with 4 analog inputs and 4 outputs, alongside 12 digital inputs and 12 outputs, bringing the total to 24 channels. It boasts a higher maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-Bit depth, catering to high-resolution audio needs. Like the iD24, it has 2 microphone preamps, but the analog I/O includes 2 XLR balanced mic/line inputs and 2 unbalanced line/Hi-Z inputs. The Babyface Pro FS also features similar digital audio I/O capabilities with TOSLINK optical connectivity. It connects via USB-B and can be powered either by an AC/DC power adapter (not included) or through USB bus power, providing flexibility depending on the user’s setup.
In summary, the choice between the Audient iD24 and the RME Babyface Pro FS largely depends on specific needs. The iD24 is an excellent choice for those who require a straightforward, portable solution with ample I/O options for small to medium sessions. Meanwhile, the Babyface Pro FS stands out with its higher sampling rate, additional digital channels, and flexibility in power options, making it ideal for users seeking a more robust audio interface with extensive connectivity.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 4 Input / 4 Output Digital: 12 Input / 12 Output	10 Input / 14 Output
Built-In DSP
	Yes
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	96 kHz / 32-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	2 Preamps
Built-In Microphone

Expansion Slots

The Audient iD24 Desktop 10x14 USB-C Audio Interface and the RME Babyface Pro FS 24-Channel USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface are both high-quality audio interfaces designed for professionals and serious enthusiasts, but they cater to different needs based on their specifications.
The Audient iD24 offers a total of 10 inputs and 14 outputs, making it versatile for various recording scenarios. It features built-in DSP, allowing users to process audio in real-time without taxing the computer’s CPU. The maximum sampling rate is 96 kHz with a 32-bit depth, providing a solid quality for most recording tasks. It includes two microphone preamps, which are known for their transparent sound. The unit also features input level adjustments via two knobs, allowing for easy control of sound levels. However, it does not include any expansion slots for additional connectivity.
In contrast, the RME Babyface Pro FS provides a broader range of channels with 4 analog inputs and outputs, along with 12 digital inputs and outputs, totaling 24 channels. It does not come with built-in DSP, which may be a consideration for users who require real-time processing capabilities. The Babyface Pro FS supports a higher maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit depth, catering to those who need the highest audio fidelity. Like the Audient, it also features two microphone preamps, but it lacks built-in microphones and expansion slots as well.
In summary, the Audient iD24 is a great choice for those looking for a straightforward, DSP-enabled interface with a solid I/O configuration and ease of use. On the other hand, the RME Babyface Pro FS is ideal for users needing more extensive digital connections and higher sampling rates, making it suitable for complex audio setups. Both interfaces are robust in their own rights, serving different user requirements effectively.

Signal Processing
Gain/Trim Range
Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs: -11 dB to +65 dB	0 to +58 dB

The Audient iD24 and the RME Babyface Pro FS are both high-quality audio interfaces, each offering unique features that cater to various recording needs. The Audient iD24 Desktop 10x14 USB-C Audio Interface is designed with a focus on simplicity and functionality, providing a pad option for mic/line inputs at -10 dB, which can be switched per channel. This feature allows for a more controlled recording level, particularly useful when dealing with high-output sources. The gain/trim range extends from 0 to +58 dB, enabling a versatile response for different microphone types and recording situations. Additionally, it includes a high-pass filter set at 100 Hz, which helps eliminate low-frequency rumble and background noise, making it ideal for vocal and instrument recording. The solo/mute function per master provides further flexibility during mix sessions.
On the other hand, the RME Babyface Pro FS 24-Channel USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface offers a more extensive gain/trim range of -11 dB to +65 dB for its mic/line/Hi-Z inputs, allowing for even greater versatility in handling various audio sources. This broader range can be particularly beneficial when working with dynamic microphones or instruments that require a higher level of amplification. The Babyface Pro FS does not explicitly state a pad feature like the iD24, but its superior gain capabilities compensate for this, providing users with ample headroom for more demanding recording scenarios.
In summary, while both interfaces provide essential features for audio recording, the Audient iD24 is tailored towards straightforward operations with its switchable pad and high-pass filter, making it user-friendly for home studios and smaller setups. In contrast, the RME Babyface Pro FS excels in gain flexibility, catering to professional environments where a wider range of input levels is necessary. Each interface has its strengths, making the choice largely dependent on the user's specific recording requirements and preferences.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic/Line Input 2x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input 2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	2x Combo XLR-1/4" 3-Pin Mic/Line Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Insert Send 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Insert Return 4x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel) 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Digital Audio I/O
1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Input 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Output	1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Input 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Output
Host Connection
1x USB-B	1x USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
USB 3.0 / 3.1/3.2 Gen 1	USB 2.0, USB 3.0 / 3.1/3.2 Gen 1
USB (Non-Host)

Sync I/O
	1x BNC Word Clock Output
Network I/O

MIDI I/O

When comparing the Audient iD24 and the RME Babyface Pro FS, both interfaces offer a robust set of features suited for different audio recording needs.
The Audient iD24 is equipped with 10 inputs and 14 outputs, providing versatility for various recording scenarios. It features 2 combo XLR-1/4" mic/line inputs and a dedicated 1/4" TS unbalanced Hi-Z input on the front panel. Additionally, it includes 2 balanced insert sends and returns, 4 balanced monitor outputs, and two headphone outputs (one 1/4" TRS and one 1/8" TRS). The iD24 supports 48V phantom power on individual inputs, with a current supply of 10 mA per channel, making it suitable for condenser microphones. Its digital audio I/O capabilities include TOSLINK optical ADAT/S/PDIF input and output, and it connects via USB-C with compatibility for USB 2.0 and USB 3.0/3.1/3.2 Gen 1 protocols. However, it lacks MIDI I/O and network connectivity, but does feature a BNC word clock output for synchronization.
In contrast, the RME Babyface Pro FS offers a more compact design while still delivering impressive audio capabilities. It features 24 channels of audio with 2 XLR 3-pin balanced mic/line inputs and 2 unbalanced 1/4" TS line/Hi-Z inputs. The Babyface Pro FS also includes 2 XLR 3-pin balanced monitor outputs and two headphone outputs (one 1/4" TRS and one 1/8" TRS). Like the iD24, it has TOSLINK optical ADAT/S/PDIF digital audio I/O, but it connects via USB-B and supports USB 3.0/3.1/3.2 Gen 1 protocols. Similar to the iD24, it does not have MIDI I/O or network connectivity, and there is no BNC word clock output present.
In summary, the Audient iD24 offers more outputs and a phantom power supply that can be individually controlled, making it ideal for larger setups needing flexibility. On the other hand, the RME Babyface Pro FS provides a compact solution with high-quality audio performance and a slightly simpler feature set, appealing to users who prioritize portability without sacrificing audio fidelity.

Performance
Frequency Response
Mic, Line Inputs: 18 Hz to 20.8 kHz -0.1 dB (at 44.1 kHz) 7 Hz to 45.8 kHz -0.5 dB (at 96 kHz) 5 Hz to 88 kHz (at 192 kHz) Line, Hi-Z Inputs: 5 Hz to 20.8 kHz -0.1 dB (at 44.1 kHz) 3 Hz to 45.8 kHz -0.5 dB (at 96 kHz) 2 Hz to 92 kHz -1 dB (at 192 kHz) Line Outputs: 0 Hz to 20.8 kHz -0.5 dB (at 44.1 kHz) 0 Hz to 45 kHz -0.5 dB (at 96 kHz) 0 Hz to 89 kHz -1 dB (at 192 kHz)	10 Hz to 40 kHz
Maximum Input Level
Mic Inputs: +8 dBu (Min Gain) +19 dBu (with Pad) -57 dBu (Max Gain) -46 dBu (with Pad) Line/Hi-Z Inputs: +13 dBu (+4 dBu) -5 dBu (-10 dBV)	Line: +12 dBu A/D Converters: +12.5 dBu for 0 dBFS
Headphone Output Power
60 mW into 10 Ohms (Max) 90 mW into 1000 Kilohms (Max)	1/4": 232 mW into 50 Ohms (Max)
Impedance
Mic/Line Inputs: 2 to 5.2 Kilohms (Balanced) 1 to 2.6 Kilohms (Unbalanced) Line/Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohm Line Outputs: 300 Ohms (Balanced) 150 Ohms (Unbalanced) Headphone Outputs: 10 Ohms (Unbalanced) 0.1 Ohm (Unbalanced)	Mic : > 2.8 Kilohms Line : > 8 Kilohms Hi-Z : > 500 Kilohms
Dynamic Range
D/A Converters: 115 dB RMS 118 dBA	A/D Converters: 122 dBA D/A Converters: 126.5 dBA Headphone: 124 dBA
SNR
Mic/Line Inputs: 113.7 dB RMS 117 dBA Line/Hi-Z Inputs: 116 dB RMS 120 dBA Line Outputs: 114.8 dB RMS 118 dBA	Mic: 97.5 dB (Unweighted) 100 dBA
THD+N
Mic/Line Inputs: < -108 dB / < 0.00035% < -100 dB / < 0.001% Line Outputs: < -102 dB / 0.0008%	Mic: -96 dB / 0.0015% Line: -97 dB / 0.0013% A/D Converters: -108 dB / 0.0004% D/A Converters: -110 dB / 0.0003%

The Audient iD24 and the RME Babyface Pro FS are both high-quality audio interfaces, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences.
Starting with the frequency response, the Audient iD24 has a range from 10 Hz to 40 kHz, ensuring a solid performance for various audio applications. In contrast, the RME Babyface Pro FS offers a more comprehensive frequency response, particularly impressive at higher sample rates, with 5 Hz to 88 kHz at 192 kHz. This makes the Babyface Pro FS better suited for high-resolution audio work, catering to professionals who require detailed frequency reproduction.
When it comes to maximum input levels, the Audient iD24 provides a maximum input level of +12 dBu for line inputs and +12.5 dBu for A/D converters, while the RME Babyface Pro FS offers greater flexibility, with mic inputs reaching up to +19 dBu when using the pad. This versatility may appeal to those working with a wider range of sources and levels.
The headphone output power of the Audient iD24 is robust at 232 mW into 50 Ohms, offering substantial driving capability for various headphones. In comparison, the RME Babyface Pro FS has a lower power output of 90 mW into 1000 Ohms, which could be limiting for some headphone users, particularly with lower impedance models.
In terms of dynamic range, the Audient iD24 boasts a dynamic range of 122 dBA for A/D converters and 126.5 dBA for D/A converters, which indicates a high level of detail and clarity in audio playback and recording. The RME Babyface Pro FS, while slightly lower in some specifications, still offers impressive metrics with a dynamic range of 115 dB RMS for D/A converters and 118 dBA overall, ensuring high-quality audio performance.
For signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the Audient iD24 achieves 97.5 dB (unweighted) for mic inputs, while the RME Babyface Pro FS excels with 113.7 dB RMS for mic/line inputs, highlighting its superior noise performance. In terms of total harmonic distortion (THD+N), the Audient iD24 shows commendable figures, but the RME Babyface Pro FS provides even lower distortion levels across its inputs and outputs, making it a more suitable choice for critical listening environments.
Overall, while the Audient iD24 is an excellent choice for those looking for a user-friendly interface with strong performance characteristics, the RME Babyface Pro FS stands out with its broader frequency response, higher input levels, and superior dynamic range and SNR, making it a compelling option for professional audio applications.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
Up to 200 kHz	TOSLINK Optical S/PDIF: Up to 96 kHz
Bit Depths
Up to 24-Bit	32-Bit
Sync Sources
ADAT	Word Clock

The Audient iD24 Desktop 10x14 USB-C Audio Interface and the RME Babyface Pro FS 24-Channel USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface present distinct features that cater to different audio production needs.
In terms of dBFS Reference Level, the Audient iD24 operates at +12 dBu = 0 dBFS, providing a solid standard for audio levels. The RME Babyface Pro FS does not specify a dBFS reference level, which may impact the ease of integration in certain setups.
When it comes to sample rates, the Audient iD24 supports TOSLINK Optical S/PDIF up to 96 kHz, while the RME Babyface Pro FS offers superior capabilities with sample rates of up to 200 kHz. This higher sample rate on the RME unit allows for greater fidelity and detail in recordings, making it more suitable for high-resolution audio applications.
In terms of bit depths, the Audient iD24 boasts a robust 32-bit depth, which is advantageous for capturing nuanced audio dynamics. In contrast, the RME Babyface Pro FS supports up to 24-bit depth, which is still excellent but does not match the iD24’s capability in terms of dynamic range and headroom.
Both interfaces feature different sync sources; the Audient iD24 utilizes word clock for synchronization, while the RME Babyface Pro FS leverages ADAT. This distinction may influence the choice depending on the specific synchronization needs of the user’s setup.
Lastly, regarding latency, the Audient iD24 provides impressive figures, with latency as low as 0.177 ms at 96 kHz. This low latency is crucial for real-time audio monitoring and recording. The RME Babyface Pro FS does not provide specific latency figures in its specifications, making it challenging to compare directly in this aspect.
Overall, the choice between the Audient iD24 and the RME Babyface Pro FS will largely depend on the user's specific requirements for sample rates, bit depth, and latency, with the RME unit offering higher sample rates and more channels, while the Audient excels in bit depth and latency performance.

Audio Storage & Playback
Memory Card Slot

The Audient iD24 Desktop 10x14 USB-C Audio Interface and the RME Babyface Pro FS 24-Channel USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface are both high-quality audio interfaces designed for professional use, but they cater to slightly different needs in terms of features and specifications.
In terms of connectivity, both devices do not include a memory card slot, which means users will need to rely on their computer or external storage options for audio recording and playback. The Audient iD24 features a USB-C connection, providing fast data transfer rates and efficient power consumption, which is ideal for mobile or desktop setups. In contrast, the RME Babyface Pro FS utilizes a USB-B connection, which is standard in many audio interfaces, but still offers robust performance and reliability.
The Audient iD24 is designed with a more compact form factor, making it suitable for desktop use without taking up too much space. It boasts 10 inputs and 14 outputs, which are sufficient for many home studio applications. The interface is known for its high-quality preamps and AD/DA conversion, making it a great choice for those who prioritize sound quality but may not require extensive routing options. On the other hand, the RME Babyface Pro FS offers a more extensive 24-channel configuration, catering to professional users who need more I/O options for complex setups. This interface also includes advanced features such as latency compensation and the renowned TotalMix FX software, allowing for greater flexibility in routing and monitoring.
In summary, while both the Audient iD24 and the RME Babyface Pro FS lack a memory card slot, their differences lie in connectivity, I/O capacity, and intended use cases. The Audient iD24 is ideal for users seeking high-quality audio in a compact format, while the RME Babyface Pro FS is better suited for those requiring extensive routing capabilities and advanced features in a more professional setting.

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS Windows	Windows macOS
Mobile App Compatible
	*As of February, 2023: Check with manufacturer for the most up-to-date compatibility

The Audient iD24 Desktop 10x14 USB-C Audio Interface and the RME Babyface Pro FS 24-Channel USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface are both high-quality audio interfaces designed for professional use, but they differ in several key aspects.
In terms of OS Compatibility, both interfaces support Windows and macOS, making them versatile options for users of different operating systems. However, the Audient iD24 requires a USB-C port for connectivity, while the RME Babyface Pro FS utilizes a USB-B interface. This may influence choice depending on the user's available hardware and existing peripherals.
Neither interface offers Mobile App Compatibility, which may be a consideration for users looking for mobile integration. Additionally, both models do not come with included software, making it essential for users to have or acquire their preferred DAW or audio software for recording and mixing.
Both models necessitate an Internet Connection for software or driver downloads, which is standard in the industry. The Audient iD24 specifies that an internet connection is required, while the RME Babyface Pro FS does not list this explicitly but may also require it for driver updates and functionality.
In summary, while the Audient iD24 and RME Babyface Pro FS both cater to Mac and Windows users, their differences in USB connectivity and the lack of included software and mobile compatibility may influence user preference. Each interface presents its unique strengths, appealing to different user needs and setups.

Power
Power Requirements
AC/DC Power Adapter (Not Included), USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

The Audient iD24 Desktop 10x14 USB-C Audio Interface and the RME Babyface Pro FS 24-Channel USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface both offer distinct power requirements that cater to different user needs.
The Audient iD24 operates solely on USB Bus Power, which provides a convenient and straightforward setup for users who prefer a portable solution without the need for additional power sources. This feature makes it suitable for mobile recording and setups where space and simplicity are priorities, allowing users to connect and power the interface directly from their computer.
In contrast, the RME Babyface Pro FS offers more flexibility in terms of power, functioning on both AC/DC Power Adapter (Not Included) and USB Bus Power. This dual power option allows for greater versatility, especially in professional studio environments where reliable power is crucial. Additionally, the Babyface Pro FS has specific power consumption ratings, consuming 2.8 W (Idle), 3.7 W (Typical), and 5.4 W (Maximum). This information can be valuable for users concerned about power efficiency and load management in their setups.
Overall, the choice between these interfaces regarding power requirements largely depends on the user's specific needs and preferences, whether they prioritize the simplicity and portability of the Audient iD24 or the versatility and power management capabilities of the RME Babyface Pro FS.

Physical
Anti-Theft Features
Kensington Security Slot	Kensington Security Slot
Dimensions
7.13 x 4.25 x 1.38" / 18.11 x 10.79 x 3.51 cm	7.8 x 5.3 x 2.6" / 198 x 134 x 66 mm

The Audient iD24 and RME Babyface Pro FS are both high-quality audio interfaces designed for professional use, but they differ in certain specifications.
Both devices feature a Kensington Security Slot, which serves as an anti-theft measure, providing added security for users who need to ensure their equipment is protected in various environments.
In terms of dimensions, the Audient iD24 measures 7.8 x 5.3 x 2.6 inches (198 x 134 x 66 mm), making it slightly bulkier compared to the RME Babyface Pro FS, which is more compact at 7.13 x 4.25 x 1.38 inches (18.11 x 10.79 x 3.51 cm). This size difference may be a consideration for users with limited desk space or those seeking a more portable solution.
The RME Babyface Pro FS also has specifications related to its operating conditions, including a recommended operating humidity of 75% and an operating temperature range of 41 to 122°F (5 to 50°C). These details are pertinent for users who may be working in different environments and need to ensure the reliability of their equipment under varying conditions.
In terms of weight, the RME Babyface Pro FS is notably lighter at 1.5 lb (680 g), which may appeal to mobile users or those who frequently transport their equipment. The Audient iD24's weight is not specified but is likely heavier due to its larger size.
Overall, both interfaces serve professional needs but cater to different preferences regarding size, weight, and environmental conditions.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
3.73 lb	3.18 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
11.6 x 6.3 x 3.3"	9.5 x 7.6 x 3.9"

The Audient iD24 Desktop 10x14 USB-C Audio Interface and the RME Babyface Pro FS 24-Channel USB-B Audio/MIDI Interface are both compact solutions designed for professional audio recording and playback, but they differ in specifications and build.
In terms of package weight, the Audient iD24 is lighter at 3.18 lb, compared to the RME Babyface Pro FS, which weighs 3.73 lb. This makes the iD24 a more portable option for users who prioritize weight in their gear. Additionally, the box dimensions for the Audient iD24 are 9.5 x 7.6 x 3.9 inches, while the RME Babyface Pro FS measures 11.6 x 6.3 x 3.3 inches. The iD24 has a slightly bulkier profile in height and width, while the RME is more elongated but slimmer in height.
The Audient iD24 features a 10x14 configuration, allowing for versatile audio routing and recording options. In contrast, the RME Babyface Pro FS offers a more extensive 24-channel capability, making it suitable for larger audio setups or more complex projects. This difference in channel count can be a deciding factor for users with specific recording needs.
Both interfaces utilize USB connectivity, with the Audient iD24 supporting USB-C and the RME Babyface Pro FS using USB-B. This may affect compatibility with various devices, depending on the user's setup.
In summary, while both audio interfaces provide high-quality audio performance, the choice between the Audient iD24 and the RME Babyface Pro FS will largely depend on the user's specific requirements for weight, dimensions, and channel count.

Customer Images
(2)

Videos

RME Babyface Pro FS vs Audient iD24: Which Audio Interface Suits You Best?

In-Depth Comparison: Specifications, Pros, and Cons

Purchase Value

Quality of Materials

Sound Quality

Ease of Use

Portability

Driver Stability

Customer Support

Compatibility

Design and Aesthetics

Latency Performance

Durability

Versatility

Firmware Updates

Input/Output Options

USB Power Capability

MIDI Functionality

Headphone Amplifier Quality

Software Bundle

Expansion Capability

Overall Satisfaction

Purchase Value

Quality of Materials

Preamps Quality

Ease of Use

Connectivity Options

Driver Stability

Software Features

Portability

Sound Quality

Build Quality

Customer Support

Latency

Compatibility

Aesthetics

Functionality

Input/Output Flexibility

Durability

Innovation

Power Options

Overall Satisfaction