Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio vs Solo Studio (4th Gen): Comprehensive Comparison

Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio vs Solo Studio (4th Gen): Comprehensive Comparison

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio and the Scarlett 2i2 Studio, both 4th Generation, are comprehensive recording packages that cater to musicians, podcasters, and home studio enthusiasts, but they serve slightly different needs.
The Scarlett Solo Studio includes the Scarlett Solo USB-C audio interface, a condenser microphone, closed-back headphones, and necessary cables. The Solo interface features one microphone input and one instrument input, making it ideal for solo artists who need to record vocals and a single instrument simultaneously. It supports high-resolution audio up to 24-bit/192kHz and offers a streamlined, user-friendly experience with essential controls for gain and direct monitoring. The Solo is compact and portable, making it an excellent choice for those who need a straightforward setup without sacrificing audio quality.
In contrast, the Scarlett 2i2 Studio package is centered around the Scarlett 2i2 USB-C audio interface, which offers two microphone/instrument combo inputs. This additional input provides greater flexibility, allowing users to record two sources simultaneously, such as two vocalists, a vocalist and an instrument, or two instruments. Like the Solo, the 2i2 supports high-resolution audio up to 24-bit/192kHz and includes similar high-quality condenser microphone and closed-back headphones. The 2i2 interface also features more extensive control options, including individual gain controls for each input and a more sophisticated direct monitoring function.
Both packages come bundled with a suite of software, including Ableton Live Lite, Focusrite’s Red Plug-in Suite, and a three-month subscription to Avid Pro Tools Artist. The main difference lies in the input capabilities and flexibility each interface provides. The Scarlett Solo Studio is perfect for individuals who require a simple, high-quality recording solution, while the Scarlett 2i2 Studio is better suited for those who need to capture multiple sources at once and desire more control over their recordings.

In-Depth Analysis of Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio and Solo Studio (4th Gen) Specifications, Pros, and Cons

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
  • Purchase Value

    87% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the complete package, which includes a high-quality microphone and headphones, making it a cost-effective solution for beginners and professionals alike. Users highlighted the seamless integration with various digital audio workstations and the exceptional sound clarity, which they felt justified the price.

    13% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, citing that while the interface and microphone were satisfactory, the headphones did not meet their expectations. Some users felt that the price was slightly high considering the build quality of certain components, particularly the headphones, which they felt could be improved.

    87%
  • Quality of Materials

    83% of users were pleased with the quality of materials used in the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio. They noted the robust build of the audio interface, which felt durable and reliable. The microphone was praised for its sturdy construction and professional feel, making it a favorite for those seeking longevity in their gear.

    17% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of materials, pointing out that while the audio interface itself was well-built, the headphones felt somewhat flimsy. Some users also mentioned that the microphone had a plasticky feel, which detracted from the overall premium experience they expected.

    83%
  • Ease of Use

    90% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio extremely easy to use. They appreciated the straightforward setup process and intuitive controls, which allowed even beginners to start recording quickly. The USB-C connectivity was highlighted for providing a fast and reliable connection to their computers.

    10% of users encountered difficulties with the ease of use, particularly related to software installation and compatibility issues with their existing systems. Some users had trouble navigating the setup instructions, which they found lacking in clarity, leading to initial frustration.

    90%
  • Sound Quality

    92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio. They praised the clear, crisp, and professional audio output of both the microphone and the interface. The low latency and high fidelity recordings were seen as a significant benefit, especially for music production and podcasting.

    8% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, noting occasional interference and noise issues, particularly when using the headphones. Some felt that while the microphone performed well, it did not meet their high expectations for studio-quality recordings.

    92%
  • Durability

    85% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio, citing the solid construction of the audio interface and microphone as evidence of its long-lasting nature. Many users felt confident in the product's ability to withstand frequent use without significant wear and tear.

    15% of users found the durability lacking, particularly with the headphones, which they reported as prone to breaking or malfunctioning after a few months of use. Some users also expressed concerns about the connectors and cables, which they felt could benefit from more robust construction.

    85%
  • Design

    89% of users praised the sleek and modern design of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio. The compact and lightweight design was appreciated for its portability and ease of integration into various studio setups. Users also enjoyed the aesthetic appeal of the red casing, which made it a stylish addition to their equipment.

    11% of users were not entirely satisfied with the design, citing that while the interface looked good, it lacked some ergonomic features that could improve user comfort during extended sessions. Some also felt that the design was somewhat generic and didn’t stand out compared to other brands.

    89%
  • Compatibility

    88% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio compatible with a wide range of devices and software. They were pleased with its performance across different operating systems and appreciated the seamless integration with popular DAWs, which facilitated their recording sessions.

    12% of users experienced compatibility issues, particularly with older operating systems or less common DAWs. Some reported difficulties in getting the device recognized by their computers, which necessitated additional troubleshooting and detracted from their overall experience.

    88%
  • Customer Support

    84% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Focusrite, appreciating the quick response times and helpful solutions offered by the support team. Many users felt reassured by the level of assistance available for resolving technical issues or inquiries.

    16% of users were not satisfied with the customer support, citing delayed responses and inadequate solutions to their problems. Some users felt that the support team lacked the technical expertise required to address more complex issues, which left them feeling frustrated.

    84%
  • Portability

    91% of users appreciated the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio, mentioning its compact size and lightweight nature as ideal for musicians and podcasters on the go. This feature was particularly valued by users who needed to travel frequently and required reliable equipment that was easy to transport.

    9% of users found the portability lacking, mainly due to the bulkiness of the microphone and headphones, which made them less convenient to carry. Some also mentioned that the need for additional cables and accessories detracted from the overall portability of the setup.

    91%
  • Volume Control

    86% of users were satisfied with the volume control features on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio. They found the controls to be precise and responsive, allowing for easy adjustments during recording and playback. The separate volume knobs for input and output were particularly appreciated for giving users greater control over their sound levels.

    14% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the volume control, citing that the knobs were either too sensitive or not sensitive enough, which made it challenging to achieve the desired sound levels. Some users also reported issues with the headphone output volume, which they felt was lower than expected.

    86%
  • Latency

    93% of users were extremely satisfied with the low latency performance of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio. They praised its ability to deliver real-time audio monitoring without delays, which was crucial for live recordings and seamless overdubbing. This aspect was often highlighted as a standout feature of the product.

    7% of users faced latency issues, particularly when using the device with certain DAWs or plugins. These users experienced noticeable delays that affected their recording sessions, leading to frustration and a need to explore additional solutions or settings adjustments to mitigate the problem.

    93%
  • Software Integration

    87% of users were satisfied with the software integration capabilities of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio. They appreciated the bundled software and plugins, which provided added value and enhanced their recording and editing capabilities. The ease of setup and compatibility with major DAWs were also positively noted.

    13% of users were not satisfied with the software integration, mentioning issues with installation and compatibility with certain third-party plugins. Some users felt that the included software was too basic and did not meet their professional needs, requiring them to invest in additional tools.

    87%
  • Microphone Quality

    88% of users were impressed with the quality of the microphone included in the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio. They noted its clear and accurate sound reproduction, which made it suitable for a variety of recording applications, from vocals to instruments. The microphone's performance was often highlighted as a key selling point.

    12% of users were not entirely satisfied with the microphone quality, pointing out occasional noise issues and a lack of warmth in the sound. Some professional users felt that the microphone did not fully capture the nuances of their recordings, which affected their overall satisfaction.

    88%
  • Headphone Quality

    82% of users were satisfied with the headphones included in the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio, appreciating their comfortable fit and decent sound quality for monitoring purposes. Many beginners found them to be a good starting point for their recording needs.

    18% of users were dissatisfied with the headphone quality, citing that the sound lacked depth and clarity compared to other headphones they had used. Some users found the headphones to be uncomfortable for long sessions and felt that they did not match the quality of the other components in the studio package.

    82%
  • Connectivity

    90% of users were pleased with the connectivity options of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio, especially the USB-C connection which provided a reliable and fast data transfer rate. Users found it easy to connect the interface to various devices without any issues, enhancing their recording efficiency.

    10% of users encountered connectivity issues, particularly related to compatibility with older hardware that lacked USB-C ports. Some users experienced dropouts or unstable connections, which they felt detracted from the overall reliability of the studio setup.

    90%
  • Setup Instructions

    81% of users were satisfied with the setup instructions provided with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio. They found the instructions to be clear and straightforward, enabling them to get their studio up and running in a short amount of time. The online resources and tutorials were also appreciated for offering additional guidance.

    19% of users were dissatisfied with the setup instructions, finding them to be confusing or incomplete. Some users felt that the instructions assumed a level of prior knowledge that they did not possess, leading to a more challenging setup process than anticipated.

    81%
  • Overall Performance

    89% of users were satisfied with the overall performance of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio. They highlighted the consistent and reliable audio quality, ease of use, and the complete package as key factors contributing to their positive experience. The product met or exceeded the expectations of many users, providing a robust solution for their recording needs.

    11% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the overall performance, citing specific issues with certain components such as the headphones or software. Some users felt that while the interface delivered on most promises, it fell short in areas critical to their particular workflow, affecting their overall satisfaction.

    89%
  • Value for Beginners

    92% of users believed the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio offered excellent value for beginners, providing a comprehensive and high-quality solution to start recording without needing additional equipment. The ease of setup and intuitive controls were particularly beneficial for those new to audio production.

    8% of users felt that the value for beginners could be improved, mainly due to the complexity of the initial setup or the need for additional accessories not included in the package. Some beginners felt overwhelmed by the technical aspects and required more guidance to fully utilize the product.

    92%
  • Packaging

    86% of users were satisfied with the packaging of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio, noting that it was well-organized and provided adequate protection for the components during transit. The thoughtful packaging made a positive first impression and added to the perceived value of the product.

    14% of users were dissatisfied with the packaging, mentioning that it lacked sufficient padding, which led to minor damages during shipping. Some users also felt that the packaging could be more environmentally friendly and easier to open without risking damage to the contents.

    86%
  • Warranty and Guarantees

    84% of users appreciated the warranty and guarantees offered with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio, which provided them with peace of mind and confidence in their purchase. The coverage was seen as a valuable assurance against potential defects or issues.

    16% of users were not satisfied with the warranty and guarantees, citing difficulties in claiming warranty benefits or finding the process to be cumbersome. Some users felt that the warranty period was too short, given the investment in the studio package.

    84%
  • Brand Reputation

    91% of users were influenced positively by the strong brand reputation of Focusrite, which has a history of producing reliable and high-quality audio equipment. The brand's commitment to innovation and customer satisfaction was a significant factor in their purchasing decision, reinforcing their trust in the product.

    9% of users were not swayed by the brand reputation, either due to past experiences with Focusrite products that did not meet their expectations or because they felt that other brands offered better value for money. These users were more focused on specific product features rather than brand loyalty.

    91%
  • Purchase Value

    85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio USB-C Audio Interface. Many praised the product for providing a comprehensive studio package at an affordable price, making it an ideal choice for beginners and hobbyists. Users appreciated the quality of the bundled microphone and headphones, which they felt exceeded their expectations for the price point.

    15% of users were dissatisfied with the purchase value, citing that although the package was affordable, they felt individual components could be of higher quality. Some users mentioned that they experienced issues with the durability of the headphones, leading them to question the overall long-term value.

    85%
  • Quality of Materials

    80% of users were content with the quality of materials used in the Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio. They highlighted the robust build of the audio interface, noting that it felt sturdy and well-constructed. Many users appreciated the sleek design and durable knobs, which contributed to a professional feel.

    20% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of materials, with complaints primarily focused on the headphones. Some users reported that the headphones felt flimsy and uncomfortable during extended use. Additionally, a few users noted issues with the microphone's build quality, expressing concerns about its longevity.

    80%
  • Ease of Setup

    90% of users were pleased with the ease of setup for the Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio. Many praised the straightforward installation process and user-friendly software, which allowed them to start recording quickly without any technical difficulties. The clear instructions provided were also noted as a major plus.

    10% of users faced challenges with the setup process. These users reported difficulties in installing the necessary drivers and software compatibility issues with certain operating systems. Some also found the initial configuration of the interface somewhat confusing without prior experience.

    90%
  • Sound Quality

    88% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality delivered by the Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio. They appreciated the clear and detailed audio capture from the microphone and the crisp playback from the headphones. Many users stated that the interface provided a noticeable improvement over their previous setups.

    12% of users were not fully satisfied with the sound quality. Some mentioned experiencing occasional audio dropouts and latency issues, particularly when using third-party software. A few users also remarked that while the sound quality was good, it didn't quite match their expectations based on the product's marketing.

    88%
  • Durability

    75% of users felt that the Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio was a durable product. They were particularly impressed with the audio interface's build, which appeared to withstand regular use without any noticeable wear and tear. Users noted that the solid construction gave them confidence in the product's longevity.

    25% of users expressed concerns about the durability of the product. The most common complaints were about the longevity of the headphones and occasional issues with cable connections. A few users reported that the microphone showed signs of wear after only a few months of use.

    75%
  • Portability

    82% of users appreciated the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio. They found the compact size of the audio interface and the light weight of the components ideal for mobile setups and small home studios. Many noted that the package was easy to transport and set up in different locations.

    18% of users found the portability lacking. Some users encountered difficulties with cable management during transport, leading to tangling and potential damage. A few also indicated that the headphones were not as travel-friendly due to their design, which made them less compact compared to other models.

    82%
  • Compatibility

    86% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio with various operating systems and DAWs. They lauded the seamless integration with popular software and the minimal configuration required to operate efficiently across different platforms.

    14% of users experienced compatibility issues. Some users faced challenges with driver installations on older operating systems and noted a lack of support for certain niche DAWs. These issues occasionally resulted in limited functionality or additional troubleshooting steps.

    86%
  • Customer Support

    78% of users were pleased with the customer support provided by Focusrite. Many reported quick response times and effective solutions to their queries, which contributed to a positive post-purchase experience. The availability of comprehensive online resources was also a noted advantage.

    22% of users were dissatisfied with customer support. They cited slow response times and insufficient assistance for more complex issues. Some users felt that the support team was not as knowledgeable about the product as expected, which led to unresolved concerns.

    78%
  • Design

    87% of users praised the design of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio, appreciating its sleek and modern aesthetic. The intuitive layout of controls on the audio interface was well-received, with users finding it easy to navigate and operate.

    13% of users were not completely satisfied with the design. Some found the headphone design to be somewhat outdated and not as comfortable as they had hoped. A few users also noted that the interface's layout, while intuitive, was not as innovative as they expected.

    87%
  • Bundled Software

    84% of users were satisfied with the bundled software that comes with the Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio. They valued the inclusion of useful plugins and DAWs, which enhanced their recording capabilities and provided a good starting point for beginners.

    16% of users found the bundled software lacking. Some users felt that the software offerings were limited and not as versatile as they would have liked for more advanced projects. A few users also experienced difficulties with software activation and updates.

    84%
  • Microphone Quality

    85% of users were satisfied with the microphone quality provided in the Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio. They noted the clear and accurate sound reproduction, which was suitable for a variety of recording applications, from vocals to instruments.

    15% of users were not entirely satisfied with the microphone quality. Some users reported issues with background noise and sensitivity levels, which affected their recordings. A few also mentioned that the microphone's performance was inconsistent in different acoustic environments.

    85%
  • Headphone Quality

    78% of users were content with the headphone quality in the Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio. They appreciated the clear sound and comfortable fit for short recording sessions, noting that the headphones were adequate for monitoring purposes.

    22% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the headphone quality. Complaints centered around comfort during extended use and the headphones' limited frequency response, which did not meet the expectations of users with prior professional experience.

    78%
  • Latency

    82% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio. They reported minimal delay during recording and monitoring, which enhanced their workflow and allowed for a more seamless recording experience.

    18% of users experienced latency issues. Some reported noticeable delays when using certain DAWs or plugins, which disrupted their recording sessions. A few users mentioned that resolving these latency problems required additional adjustments and settings changes.

    82%
  • Aesthetics

    88% of users appreciated the aesthetics of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio, noting its modern and visually appealing design. The red aluminum casing of the audio interface was particularly well-liked, with users finding it both stylish and professional.

    12% of users were less impressed with the aesthetics. Some found the design to be too minimalistic, wishing for more distinctive features. A few also commented that the headphones' appearance did not match the sleek design of the interface, detracting from the overall visual appeal.

    88%
  • Instruction Manual

    80% of users found the instruction manual helpful and easy to understand. They appreciated the clear guidance provided, which helped them navigate the setup and operation of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio without needing additional assistance.

    20% of users were dissatisfied with the instruction manual. Some found it lacking in detail, particularly for more advanced features or troubleshooting steps. A few users mentioned that the manual did not adequately address certain common issues, leaving them to seek help elsewhere.

    80%
  • Connectivity Options

    83% of users were pleased with the connectivity options available on the Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio. They appreciated the USB-C interface for its speed and reliability, as well as the various input and output options that allowed for flexible setups.

    17% of users found the connectivity options insufficient. Some users desired more input channels for greater versatility in their recording setups. A few also mentioned occasional connectivity issues with certain computers, which required additional adapters or troubleshooting.

    83%
  • User Interface

    89% of users were very satisfied with the user interface of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio. They highlighted the intuitive design and ease of navigation, which made it simple to adjust settings and achieve desired audio results quickly.

    11% of users found the user interface lacking. Some mentioned that while it was generally user-friendly, certain adjustments required more steps than anticipated, leading to a slight learning curve. A few users also expressed a desire for more advanced customization options.

    89%
  • Brand Reputation

    91% of users expressed trust and satisfaction with the brand reputation of Focusrite. They valued the company's history of producing reliable audio equipment and felt confident in their purchase due to positive past experiences or recommendations.

    9% of users were less impressed with the brand reputation. Some mentioned previous issues with other Focusrite products that affected their confidence. A few users also felt that the brand did not live up to its reputation in terms of innovation and customer service.

    91%
  • Overall Satisfaction

    84% of users reported overall satisfaction with the Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio. They found it to be a well-rounded package that met their recording needs, offering good sound quality, ease of use, and a solid build at a competitive price.

    16% of users were not fully satisfied overall. Some users believed the product did not meet their specific professional requirements or had higher expectations based on reviews. A few also noted minor issues that, when combined, affected their overall experience.

    84%
Show More
Pros:
  • High-quality preamps for clear audio recording.
  • Comes as a complete studio bundle with microphone and headphones.
  • USB-C connectivity for faster data transfer and reliability.
  • Easy-to-use interface suitable for beginners and professionals.
  • Compact and portable design.
  • High-quality microphone and headphones included, making it a comprehensive starter kit.
  • USB-C connectivity ensures fast and reliable data transfer.
  • Compact and portable design, ideal for mobile setups.
  • High-resolution audio recording up to 24-bit/192kHz.
  • Easy to use with a simplified control interface.
Cons:
  • Higher price point compared to some entry-level interfaces.
  • Limited to two input channels, which might not suit all users.
  • Headphones and microphone, while good, may not meet high-end professional standards.
  • Requires USB-C port, which may not be available on older computers.
  • Limited to only one XLR input, which may not be suitable for multi-microphone setups.
  • No MIDI input/output for connecting MIDI controllers or instruments.
  • Headphones and microphone quality may not meet professional studio standards.
  • Requires software installation, which could be cumbersome for some users.
  • Pricier compared to other entry-level audio interfaces without bundled accessories.
Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog:
2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Analog:
2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit 192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 1
Analog Audio I/O
2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel)
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output
1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input
1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel)
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output
1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Digital Audio I/O
Host Connection
1x USB-C 1x USB-C
OS Compatibility
macOS
Windows
macOS
Windows
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included) USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation) and the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation) are both high-quality audio interfaces designed for recording enthusiasts and professionals. However, they differ in certain specifications and capabilities.
Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation):
- Channels of I/O: This interface provides 2 analog inputs and 2 analog outputs at a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz/24-bit. - Number of Microphone Inputs: It includes 1 microphone input. - Analog Audio I/O: It features 1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input, 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel), 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Outputs, and 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel). - Digital Audio I/O: There are no digital audio inputs or outputs. - Host Connection: It connects via 1x USB-C. - OS Compatibility: Compatible with macOS and Windows. - Power Requirements: It is powered via USB Bus Power or a USB Power Adapter (not included).
Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation):
- Channels of I/O: This model also provides 2 analog inputs and 2 analog outputs at the same maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz/24-bit. - Number of Microphone Inputs: It includes 2 microphone inputs, offering more flexibility for recording multiple sources simultaneously. - Analog Audio I/O: It features 2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Inputs, 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Inputs (Front Panel), 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Outputs, and 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel). - Digital Audio I/O: There are no digital audio inputs or outputs. - Host Connection: It connects via 1x USB-C. - OS Compatibility: Compatible with macOS and Windows. - Power Requirements: It is powered via USB Bus Power or a USB Power Adapter (not included).
In summary, both interfaces offer high-resolution audio capabilities and similar power and connectivity options. The primary difference lies in the number of microphone inputs and analog audio I/O configurations. The Scarlett Solo has 1 microphone input and a simpler I/O setup, making it ideal for solo musicians or podcasters. In contrast, the Scarlett 2i2 offers 2 microphone inputs and more versatile I/O options, catering to users needing to record multiple sources simultaneously, such as duets or small bands.
General
Channels of I/O
Analog:
2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Analog:
2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Built-In DSP
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit 192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 1
Built-In Microphone
Input Level Adjustment
2x Knob 2x Knob
Expansion Slots
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation) and the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation) share several key specifications but also have notable differences that set them apart.
Both interfaces offer the same maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit, ensuring high-quality audio recording and playback. They each feature 2 analog inputs and 2 analog outputs, also supporting a maximum sample rate of 192 kHz. Neither unit includes built-in DSP or a built-in microphone, and both have input level adjustments controlled by two knobs. Additionally, neither interface includes expansion slots, keeping the design streamlined and focused on core functionality.
The primary distinction between the two models lies in the number of microphone inputs. The Scarlett Solo Studio includes 1 microphone input, making it ideal for solo performers or podcasters who only need to record one mic at a time. In contrast, the Scarlett 2i2 Studio provides 2 microphone inputs, which is more suitable for users who need to record with multiple microphones simultaneously, such as duets, interviews, or small ensemble recordings.
In summary, while both Focusrite interfaces offer high-quality audio performance and similar basic features, the Scarlett 2i2 Studio provides more versatility with its additional microphone input, making it a better choice for users who require multi-mic recording capabilities. The Scarlett Solo Studio, however, remains an excellent option for single-microphone applications, offering a straightforward and effective solution for individual creators.
Signal Processing
Gain/Trim Range
Mic/Line Inputs:
Up to +69 dB
Hi-Z Inputs:
62 dB
Mic/Line Inputs:
Up to +69 dB
Hi-Z Inputs:
62 dB
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation) and the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation) both feature impressive gain/trim ranges, making them suitable for a variety of recording needs. Specifically, both models offer a gain range of up to +69 dB for mic/line inputs and 62 dB for Hi-Z inputs.
Given these specifications, both the Scarlett Solo and Scarlett 2i2 Studio models are equipped with the same level of preamp gain, ensuring high-quality audio capture whether you are using microphones, line-level instruments, or high-impedance instruments like electric guitars. This gain range is particularly beneficial for users who need to capture detailed and nuanced sound, making both interfaces versatile choices for studio recording.
In summary, when comparing the Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio and the Scarlett 2i2 Studio, both 4th Generation models offer identical gain/trim ranges for their mic/line and Hi-Z inputs. This makes them equally capable in terms of preamp performance, ensuring that users can achieve the desired audio quality regardless of their specific recording setup.
Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel)
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output
1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input
1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel)
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output
1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Phantom Power
48 V, Selectable On/Off 48 V, Selectable On/Off
Digital Audio I/O
Host Connection
1x USB-C 1x USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0 USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)
1x USB-C (Power Input)
Sync I/O
Network I/O
MIDI I/O
Wireless
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation) and the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation) are both high-quality audio interfaces designed for home studios and portable recording setups. However, they differ in several key features that cater to different user needs.
The Scarlett Solo Studio features a single XLR 3-pin balanced mic input and a single 1/4" TS unbalanced line/Hi-Z input on the front panel. This makes it ideal for solo artists or podcasters who only need to record one microphone and one instrument or line-level source at a time. It also offers two 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs and one 1/4" TRS headphone output on the front panel. This interface is straightforward and easy to use, with phantom power selectable on/off, but it lacks additional digital audio I/O, sync I/O, network I/O, MIDI I/O, and wireless capabilities. It connects to the host via a single USB-C port using the USB 2.0 protocol.
In contrast, the Scarlett 2i2 Studio provides more versatility with two XLR 3-pin balanced mic inputs and two 1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced line/Hi-Z inputs on the front panel. This allows for recording multiple sources simultaneously, making it suitable for duos, small bands, or more complex recording setups. Like the Solo, it includes two 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs and one 1/4" TRS headphone output on the front panel, with selectable 48 V phantom power. Additionally, the Scarlett 2i2 has an extra USB-C port dedicated to power input, which can be useful in various recording environments. However, similar to the Solo, it lacks additional digital audio I/O, sync I/O, network I/O, MIDI I/O, and wireless capabilities, and it connects via USB 2.0 protocol.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio is a more simplified and accessible option for individuals needing a basic setup with one mic and one instrument input. On the other hand, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio offers greater flexibility with additional inputs, making it better suited for users who need to record multiple sources simultaneously. Both models deliver high-quality audio performance and connect via USB-C, maintaining Focusrite's reputation for reliable and user-friendly interfaces.
Performance
Frequency Response
XLR Mic Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB
1/4" Line Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.05 dB
1/4" Hi-Z Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.15 dB
XLR Mic Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB
1/4" Line Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.05 dB
1/4" Hi-Z Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.15 dB
Maximum Input Level
XLR Mic:
16 dBu
1/4" Line:
22 dBu
1/4" Hi-Z:
12 dBu
XLR Mic:
9.5 dBu
1/4" Line:
22 dBu
1/4" Hi-Z:
12 dBu
Maximum Output Level
1/4" Line:
+16 dBu
1/4" Line:
+16 dBu
Headphone Output Power
1/4":
32 mW into 33 Ohms
22 mW into 300 Ohms
1/4":
32 mW into 33 Ohms
22 mW into 300 Ohms
Impedance
XLR Mic Inputs:
3 Kilohms
1/4" Line Inputs:
60 Kilohms
1/4" Hi-Z Inputs:
1 Megohms
1/4" Line Outputs:
100 Ohms
1/4" Headphone Outputs:
< 50 Ohm
XLR Mic Inputs:
3 Kilohms
1/4" Line Inputs:
60 Kilohms
1/4" Hi-Z Inputs:
1 Megohms
1/4" Line Outputs:
200 Ohms
1/4" Headphone Outputs:
< 50 Ohm
Dynamic Range
XLR Mic Inputs:
116 dBA
1/4" Line Inputs:
115.2 dBA
1/4" Hi-Z Inputs:
113 dBA
1/4" Line Outputs:
120 dB
1/4" Headphone:
112 dB (at 33 Ohms)
115 dB (at 300 Ohms)
Digital A/D Converters:
120 dB
Digital D/A Converters:
130 dBA
XLR Mic Inputs:
113 dBA
1/4" Line Inputs:
113 dBA
1/4" Hi-Z Inputs:
112 dBA
1/4" Line Outputs:
120 dB
1/4" Headphone:
112 dB (at 33 Ohms)
115 dB (at 300 Ohms)
Digital A/D Converters:
120 dB
Digital D/A Converters:
130 dBA
THD+N
XLR Mic Inputs:
-100 dB (at 8 dB Gain)
1/4" Line Inputs:
-100 dB (at 8 dB Gain)
1/4" Hi-Z Inputs:
-80 dB (at Minimum Gain)
1/4" Line Outputs:
-109 dB
1/4" Headphone Outputs:
-99 dB (at 33 Ohms)
-108 dB (at 300 Ohms)
Digital A/D Converters:
-110 dB
Digital D/A Converters:
-115 dB
XLR Mic Inputs:
-100 dB (at Minimum Gain)
1/4" Line Inputs:
-100 dB (at 8 dB Gain)
1/4" Hi-Z Inputs:
-80 dB (at Minimum Gain)
1/4" Line Outputs:
-100 dB (at Minimum Gain)
1/4" Headphone Outputs:
-97 dB (at 33 Ohms)
-102 dB (at 300 Ohms)
Digital A/D Converters:
-110 dB
Digital D/A Converters:
-115 dB
EIN
XLR Mic Inputs:
-127 dBu A-Weighted
XLR Mic Inputs:
-127 dBu A-Weighted
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation) and the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation) share numerous similarities in their specifications but also exhibit some key differences.
Both devices offer a frequency response for XLR Mic Inputs, 1/4" Line Inputs, and 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs of 20 Hz to 20 kHz, with slight variations in the dB range (XLR Mic Inputs: ±0.06 dB, 1/4" Line Inputs: 0.05 dB, 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 0.15 dB). This indicates that both interfaces are designed to capture a wide range of frequencies with minimal variation, ensuring high-fidelity sound.
In terms of maximum input levels, the Scarlett Solo Studio handles XLR Mic inputs up to 9.5 dBu, while the Scarlett 2i2 Studio can manage up to 16 dBu. Both models can take 22 dBu for 1/4" Line inputs and 12 dBu for 1/4" Hi-Z inputs, showing that the 2i2 Studio has a higher threshold for mic inputs, making it more versatile for different microphone types and louder sources.
When it comes to maximum output levels, both interfaces provide a 1/4" Line output of +16 dBu. For headphone output power, both models deliver 32 mW into 33 Ohms and 22 mW into 300 Ohms, ensuring adequate power for various headphone impedances.
The impedance specifications are almost identical, with XLR Mic Inputs at 3 Kilohms, 1/4" Line Inputs at 60 Kilohms, and 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs at 1 Megohm. However, the 2i2 Studio has a slightly lower 1/4" Line Output impedance at 100 Ohms compared to the Solo's 200 Ohms. Both models' headphone outputs are less than 50 Ohms.
Regarding dynamic range, the Scarlett Solo Studio offers 113 dBA for XLR Mic Inputs and 1/4" Line Inputs, 112 dBA for 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs, and 120 dB for 1/4" Line Outputs. It provides a headphone dynamic range of 112 dB (at 33 Ohms) and 115 dB (at 300 Ohms). The Scarlett 2i2 Studio offers slightly higher dynamic ranges for XLR Mic Inputs (116 dBA) and 1/4" Line Inputs (115.2 dBA), with the same values for other inputs and outputs as the Solo.
Total Harmonic Distortion plus Noise (THD+N) shows minor differences, with both models exhibiting -100 dB for XLR Mic Inputs and 1/4" Line Inputs at 8 dB Gain. The 2i2 Studio has slightly better THD+N values for 1/4" Line Outputs (-109 dB) and 1/4" Headphone Outputs (-99 dB at 33 Ohms, -108 dB at 300 Ohms) compared to the Solo's -100 dB (at Minimum Gain) and -97 dB (at 33 Ohms), -102 dB (at 300 Ohms).
Lastly, both models have an Equivalent Input Noise (EIN) for XLR Mic Inputs of -127 dBu A-Weighted, indicating low noise levels suitable for high-quality recordings.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio generally offers slightly better specifications in terms of input levels, dynamic range, and THD+N, making it a more robust choice for users requiring higher performance and versatility. The Scarlett Solo Studio, while slightly less advanced in some respects, remains a high-quality option for simpler recording needs.
Digital Audio
Sample Rates
44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 / 176.4 / 192 kHz 44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 / 176.4 / 192 kHz
Bit Depths
24-Bit 24-Bit
Sync Sources
Internal Internal
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation) and the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation) share several key specifications that make them both excellent choices for audio recording and production. Both interfaces support sample rates of 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, 176.4, and 192 kHz, ensuring high-quality audio capture and playback. This versatility allows users to work with various professional audio standards. Additionally, both interfaces offer a bit depth of 24-bit, which provides a wide dynamic range and high-resolution audio recording.
The sync source for both the Scarlett Solo Studio and the Scarlett 2i2 Studio is internal, meaning they do not require an external clock source to maintain synchronization. This feature simplifies the setup process and ensures stable and reliable operation during recording sessions.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio and the Scarlett 2i2 Studio (both 4th Generation) are remarkably similar in terms of technical specifications, including sample rates, bit depths, and sync sources. Both interfaces are designed to deliver high-quality audio performance, making them suitable for a range of recording applications.
Audio Storage & Playback
Media/Memory Card Slot
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation) and the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation) are both high-quality audio interfaces designed for musicians, podcasters, and home studio enthusiasts. Both models are equipped with USB-C connectivity, ensuring fast and reliable data transfer. However, neither of these models includes a media/memory card slot, which is a similarity worth noting for potential users who may require direct recording to media storage.
In terms of their core components, both packages come with a studio-quality microphone and headphones, ensuring that users have the essential tools needed for professional recording right out of the box. This makes both options particularly attractive for beginners and those looking to upgrade their current setup.
While the Scarlett Solo typically offers a single microphone input and a single instrument input, making it ideal for solo artists or podcasters who need a straightforward setup, the Scarlett 2i2 provides additional flexibility with two microphone/instrument combo inputs. This dual-input configuration allows for more complex recording scenarios, such as duets or multi-instrumental recordings.
Overall, both the Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio and the Scarlett 2i2 Studio (4th Generation) provide high-quality audio performance and essential recording accessories. The primary difference lies in the input configuration, with the Solo being more suited for individual projects and the 2i2 catering to more versatile recording needs. Neither model includes a media/memory card slot, so users should plan to record directly to their computer or another external storage solution.
Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS
Windows
macOS
Windows
Mobile App Compatible
Yes: iPadOS Only Yes: iPadOS Only
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation) and the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation) share some common features, particularly in terms of OS compatibility and mobile app compatibility. Both models are compatible with macOS and Windows operating systems, ensuring seamless integration with a wide range of computers. Additionally, both interfaces offer mobile app compatibility specifically with iPadOS, enabling users to leverage their iPads for audio recording and production tasks.
These shared specifications highlight the versatility and adaptability of both the Scarlett Solo Studio and Scarlett 2i2 Studio interfaces, making them suitable for various recording environments and user preferences. Whether you are using a Mac, a Windows PC, or an iPad, these interfaces offer a consistent user experience across different platforms. This cross-platform compatibility is especially beneficial for musicians, podcasters, and content creators who may switch between devices or work in different recording setups.
Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included) USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)
AC/DC Power Adapter
5 VDC at 900 mA 5 VDC at 900 mA
Power Consumption
4.5 W 4.5 W
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation) and the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation) share a number of core specifications. Both models are designed to be powered via USB Bus Power, and they also support an optional USB Power Adapter which is not included in the package. Additionally, both devices can operate with an AC/DC Power Adapter rated at 5 VDC with a current requirement of 900 mA. The power consumption for both the Scarlett Solo Studio and the Scarlett 2i2 Studio stands at 4.5 W.
These shared specifications highlight a consistency in power requirements and consumption between the two models, ensuring that users can expect similar performance in terms of energy efficiency and power management. This makes either option suitable for various recording environments, whether connected directly to a computer via USB or using an external power source.
Physical
Dimensions
7.1 x 4.6 x 1.87" / 18 x 11.7 x 4.75 cm 5.63 x 3.78 x 1.79" / 14.3 x 9.6 x 4.55 cm
Weight
1.3 lb / 595.0 g 0.8 lb / 363.0 g
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation) and the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation) differ in several physical dimensions and weight specifications.
The Scarlett Solo Studio measures 5.63 x 3.78 x 1.79 inches (14.3 x 9.6 x 4.55 cm) and weighs 0.8 lb (363.0 g). This makes it relatively compact and lightweight, ideal for solo musicians or podcasters who need a portable yet high-quality audio interface setup.
On the other hand, the Scarlett 2i2 Studio is slightly larger, with dimensions of 7.1 x 4.6 x 1.87 inches (18 x 11.7 x 4.75 cm) and a weight of 1.3 lb (595.0 g). While still portable, the 2i2 offers more connectivity options and might be better suited for users who need to connect multiple instruments or microphones simultaneously.
In summary, the Scarlett Solo Studio is more compact and lighter, making it highly portable for single-user setups, whereas the Scarlett 2i2 Studio, though slightly larger and heavier, offers more connectivity options, making it ideal for more complex recording setups.
Packaging Info
Package Weight
5.64 lb 5.055 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
15.5 x 10.3 x 4.9" 14.7 x 10.6 x 4.9"
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation) and the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio USB-C Audio Interface with Microphone and Headphones (4th Generation) are two prominent audio interface packages designed for musicians, podcasters, and audio engineers. They offer distinct specifications and features that cater to different needs.
Starting with the package weight, the Scarlett Solo Studio is comparatively lighter, weighing 5.055 lb, whereas the Scarlett 2i2 Studio has a slightly heavier package weight of 5.64 lb. This difference in weight could be attributed to the additional input options and potentially more robust components of the 2i2 model.
Looking at the box dimensions, the Scarlett Solo Studio measures 14.7 x 10.6 x 4.9 inches. On the other hand, the Scarlett 2i2 Studio has dimensions of 15.5 x 10.3 x 4.9 inches. While the length of the 2i2 box is slightly greater, the width of the Solo box is marginally larger, but both share the same height.
In terms of overall offerings, the Scarlett Solo Studio is tailored for solo artists or individuals who require a simpler setup, as it typically includes a single mic preamp and one instrument input. Conversely, the Scarlett 2i2 Studio is more versatile, offering two mic preamps, allowing for more complex recording setups such as duets or simultaneous instrument and vocal recordings.
Both packages include a high-quality microphone and headphones, ensuring a comprehensive studio setup out of the box. However, the choice between the two would ultimately depend on the user's specific recording needs, with the Solo catering to simpler, single-person setups and the 2i2 offering more flexibility for diverse recording scenarios.
Customer Images
Videos