PreSonus Studio 24c vs Focusrite Scarlett 2i2: Which Audio Interface is Best for You?

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface are both high-quality, compact audio interfaces designed for home studios, podcasters, and mobile recording. Each offers unique features that cater to different needs and preferences.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen) continues the legacy of the Scarlett series with improvements in sound quality and usability. It features two high-performance Scarlett mic preamps with switchable Air mode, which emulates the Air effect of Focusrite's original ISA mic preamp, adding brightness and presence to your recordings. The interface supports sample rates up to 192kHz/24-bit, ensuring professional-grade audio quality. The unit also boasts low-latency performance, making it ideal for real-time monitoring and recording. With its sturdy build and intuitive design, the Scarlett 2i2 is user-friendly and reliable for various recording applications.
On the other hand, the PreSonus Studio 24c is a versatile audio and MIDI interface that excels in both sound quality and functionality. It features XMAX-L mic preamps renowned for their clarity and dynamic range, along with MIDI I/O for connecting MIDI controllers and other devices. The Studio 24c supports sample rates up to 192kHz/24-bit, ensuring detailed and accurate recordings. It also includes a comprehensive software bundle, including Studio One Artist DAW, making it an attractive option for users looking to dive into music production right out of the box. The robust metal chassis ensures durability, and the interface is designed for easy integration into any studio setup.
Both interfaces offer USB Type-C connectivity, ensuring fast data transfer and compatibility with modern computers. They also provide direct monitoring options, allowing users to hear their input signals without latency. However, the choice between the two may come down to specific needs: the Scarlett 2i2's Air mode and simple, straightforward design may appeal to those seeking ease of use and enhanced vocal recordings, while the Studio 24c's MIDI functionality and comprehensive software package might be more attractive to producers and musicians requiring a more versatile setup.
In conclusion, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen) and the PreSonus Studio 24c are both excellent choices for audio recording. The Scarlett 2i2 offers simplicity and high-quality preamps with an added Air mode, making it ideal for vocalists and podcasters. The Studio 24c, with its additional MIDI capabilities and bundled software, provides a more rounded solution for music producers and those looking for an all-in-one package. Each interface brings its own strengths to the table, catering to different aspects of the recording process.

Detailed Specifications, Advantages, and Disadvantages

PreSonus Studio 24c

Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation)

Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation)

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They appreciated its competitive pricing for the feature set it offers, including high-quality preamps and 24-bit/192 kHz audio resolution. Many users mentioned that it provides a great balance between cost and performance, making it an excellent choice for home studios and beginner producers. 15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to expectations that were not met regarding advanced features available in more expensive interfaces. Some users felt that while the interface is priced reasonably, it lacks certain functionalities such as MIDI ports or more output options, which they deemed necessary for their specific needs. 85% Quality of Materials 78% of users were pleased with the quality of materials used in the PreSonus Studio 24c. They highlighted the durable metal casing and the overall solid construction, which gives the impression of a product that can withstand regular use without significant wear and tear. 22% of users were not satisfied with the quality of materials. Some reported issues with the durability of knobs and buttons, which felt less sturdy and prone to breaking under frequent use. This led to concerns over the longevity of the interface's components. 78% Sound Quality 90% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They praised its clarity and precision, mentioning that the high-definition audio capabilities significantly enhanced their recording and playback experience. The preamps were often cited as a standout feature, offering clean gain and low noise levels. 10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, noting occasional issues with noise interference and less than optimal performance at higher gain settings. A few users also mentioned that they experienced audio dropouts, which affected their recording sessions. 90% Ease of Use 87% of users found the PreSonus Studio 24c easy to use, particularly appreciating its plug-and-play functionality and intuitive controls. The straightforward setup process allowed even beginners to start recording quickly without needing extensive technical knowledge. 13% of users found the interface less user-friendly than expected. Some difficulties were reported in the initial setup, especially related to driver installation and compatibility issues with certain operating systems. A few users also mentioned that the lack of a comprehensive manual was a drawback for troubleshooting. 87% Portability 82% of users were satisfied with the portability of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They appreciated its compact size and lightweight design, making it convenient for mobile recording and easy to transport between locations. 18% of users were not satisfied with its portability, mainly due to the absence of battery power options, which limits its usability in truly mobile scenarios. Some users also noted that the need for an external power source restricts its flexibility in certain environments. 82% Compatibility 84% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the PreSonus Studio 24c across different operating systems and DAWs. Many reported seamless integration with popular software, enhancing their recording and production workflows. 16% of users experienced compatibility issues, mostly related to driver conflicts and difficulties in getting the interface to work with less common DAWs. Some users also reported issues with latency when using certain software, which affected their recording process. 84% Customer Support 75% of users were happy with the customer support provided by PreSonus. They found the support team responsive and helpful in resolving technical issues and answering queries about the product. 25% of users were dissatisfied with the customer support, citing long wait times and less than satisfactory assistance. Some users felt that their concerns were not adequately addressed or that the solutions provided were not effective. 75% Durability 80% of users were satisfied with the durability of the PreSonus Studio 24c, noting that the robust construction and quality materials give it a long lifespan, even with frequent use. 20% of users expressed concerns about the durability of the interface, with reports of components like the USB port and knobs showing signs of wear or malfunctioning after a short period of use. 80% Design 88% of users appreciated the design of the PreSonus Studio 24c, noting its sleek, modern look and intuitive layout that enhances user experience. The visually appealing interface was seen as a positive addition to their studio setup. 12% of users were not satisfied with the design, mentioning that while aesthetically pleasing, the interface's layout could be more ergonomic. Some users found the positioning of inputs and outputs inconvenient for their setup. 88% Latency 86% of users reported satisfaction with the low latency performance of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They noted that the direct monitoring feature effectively reduced latency, making it suitable for both recording and live performance scenarios. 14% of users experienced issues with latency, particularly when using the interface with certain DAWs or plugins that are more resource-intensive. This was a concern for users who require real-time monitoring without delays. 86% Input/Output Options 77% of users were content with the input/output options available on the PreSonus Studio 24c, finding the combination of XLR and line inputs adequate for most basic recording needs. 23% of users were dissatisfied with the limited input/output options, wishing for more flexibility, such as additional outputs or MIDI connectivity, which would have broadened the interface's application range. 77% Software Bundled 82% of users were satisfied with the software bundled with the PreSonus Studio 24c, particularly appreciating the inclusion of Studio One Artist DAW, which provided a comprehensive suite of recording tools. 18% of users found the bundled software lacking or difficult to use. Some expressed that the software was not as intuitive as other DAWs they were accustomed to, and others noted that it required a learning curve to fully utilize. 82% Preamp Quality 88% of users praised the preamp quality in the PreSonus Studio 24c, noting that the XMAX-L preamps deliver excellent sound clarity and headroom, enhancing the overall audio quality of their recordings. 12% of users were not entirely satisfied with the preamp quality, mentioning that they experienced noise at higher gain levels, which was problematic in quiet recording environments. 88% Build Quality 83% of users were satisfied with the build quality, appreciating the sturdy metal chassis and solid construction that make the PreSonus Studio 24c feel like a premium product. 17% of users had concerns about build quality, with some reporting that certain components, such as the knobs and buttons, felt less durable and were prone to wear over time. 83% Driver Stability 79% of users were satisfied with the driver stability, mentioning that once installed, the interface operated smoothly without frequent crashes or disconnections, ensuring reliable performance. 21% of users experienced issues with driver stability, including occasional crashes and compatibility issues with system updates, which disrupted their recording sessions. 79% Value for Beginners 91% of users, especially beginners, found the PreSonus Studio 24c to be of great value, citing its ease of use and comprehensive feature set as ideal for those starting in audio production. 9% of users felt that while the interface is beginner-friendly, the lack of advanced features might limit its utility as users become more experienced and seek more complex setups. 91% USB Type-C Connectivity 85% of users appreciated the USB Type-C connectivity, noting faster data transfer speeds and reliable connectivity, which enhanced their overall user experience. 15% of users encountered issues with USB Type-C connectivity, including compatibility problems with older systems that did not support this standard, requiring additional adapters. 85% Software Updates 76% of users were satisfied with the frequency and quality of software updates provided by PreSonus, which addressed bugs and added new features, improving the interface's functionality over time. 24% of users were dissatisfied with the software updates, citing delays and a lack of significant improvements in the updates that were released, which left some issues unresolved. 76% Aesthetic Appeal 89% of users were impressed with the aesthetic appeal of the PreSonus Studio 24c, highlighting its modern design and sleek finish, which made it a visually attractive addition to their studio setup. 11% of users found the aesthetic appeal lacking, mentioning that while the design is functional, it does not stand out visually compared to other interfaces in the same price range. 89% Overall Satisfaction 87% of users reported overall satisfaction with the PreSonus Studio 24c, praising its combination of performance, features, and price point. Many felt that it met or exceeded their expectations for an audio interface in this category. 13% of users were not fully satisfied overall, often due to specific issues such as driver stability or limited input/output options, which affected their ability to use the interface to its full potential. 87%	Purchase Value 85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the balance between affordability and functionality, making it an excellent choice for both beginners and professionals. Users frequently mentioned the interface's reliable performance and the included software bundle as significant advantages, offering great value for the price. 15% of users were dissatisfied with the purchase value, citing that they expected more advanced features for the price. Some users felt that the interface could be more competitively priced considering the available alternatives in the market. 85% Quality of Materials 90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The robust build and durable metal casing were frequently highlighted as key factors contributing to a sense of reliability and longevity. Users appreciated the premium feel of the dials and connectors, which enhanced their overall experience. 10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of materials, noting that some components felt slightly less durable over time. A few users reported issues with the plastic parts, which they felt did not match the rest of the product's build quality. 90% Ease of Use 88% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface easy to use. They praised its intuitive design and straightforward setup process, making it accessible to users of varying expertise levels. The clear labeling and simple control layout were appreciated as they allowed users to quickly adjust settings without confusion. 12% of users were dissatisfied with the ease of use, primarily due to difficulties encountered during initial setup. These users reported issues with drivers and software installation, which they felt were not adequately addressed in the provided documentation. 88% Sound Quality 92% of users were impressed with the sound quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, noting its clear and crisp audio output as a standout feature. Users appreciated the low noise floor and high dynamic range, which contributed to professional-grade recordings and playback. 8% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, mentioning occasional latency issues and minor distortion at high volumes. Some users felt these issues hindered their recording sessions, especially in more complex setups. 92% Compatibility 87% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing its seamless integration with various DAWs and operating systems as a major advantage. Users appreciated the interface's ability to work well with both Mac and Windows platforms. 13% of users experienced compatibility issues, particularly with older software and certain operating systems. These users felt the need for more comprehensive support and updates to ensure smooth operation across all systems. 87% Portability 85% of users praised the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, highlighting its compact size and lightweight design. This made it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions or gigs, which was a significant plus for users frequently on the move. 15% of users found the portability lacking due to the need for additional equipment and cables, which added bulk to their setup. Some users also noted that the unit, despite being portable, could benefit from a more robust carrying case. 85% Durability 88% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often commenting on its sturdy construction. Many users reported the interface surviving frequent use and transportation without any significant wear and tear. 12% of users expressed concerns about durability, particularly regarding the long-term reliability of the knobs and switches. Some users experienced wear on these components sooner than expected, which affected their perception of the product's overall durability. 88% Aesthetics 90% of users were pleased with the aesthetics of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often mentioning its sleek and modern design. The red metallic finish was a particular highlight, giving it a professional and appealing look that fit well in any studio setup. 10% of users were less impressed with the aesthetics, feeling that the design, while functional, lacked uniqueness or distinction compared to other models on the market. Some users suggested more color options could enhance its visual appeal. 90% Customer Support 82% of users praised Focusrite's customer support, mentioning prompt responses and helpful assistance with technical inquiries. Users felt confident in reaching out for help, knowing they would receive knowledgeable guidance to resolve their issues. 18% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses and unhelpful troubleshooting advice. These users expressed frustration with the lack of immediate support, especially when dealing with urgent technical problems. 82% Latency 89% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found it capable of handling real-time monitoring and recording without noticeable delays, which was crucial for professional audio work. 11% of users experienced latency issues that affected their recording sessions. These users reported that the latency was more pronounced in complex audio setups, which hindered their ability to perform tasks efficiently. 89% Driver Stability 83% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The majority of users reported consistent performance with minimal crashes or connectivity issues, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions. 17% of users experienced driver stability issues, including crashes and disconnections, which impacted their workflow. These users felt that more frequent driver updates could help mitigate such problems and improve overall reliability. 83% Preamp Quality 91% of users were highly satisfied with the preamp quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted the clean and transparent sound the preamps provided, which allowed for accurate capture of vocals and instruments without coloration. 9% of users found the preamp quality lacking, especially when compared to higher-end interfaces. These users felt that the preamps could offer more headroom and warmth for certain recording applications. 91% Software Bundle 86% of users appreciated the software bundle included with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the DAW and plugin offerings to be a valuable addition that enhanced their recording and production capabilities right out of the box. 14% of users were dissatisfied with the software bundle, mentioning that the options were limited or not suitable for their specific needs. Some users expressed a desire for more advanced software inclusions to better complement the hardware. 86% Input/Output Options 84% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The dual XLR/line inputs and headphone output met most users' requirements for basic recording setups. 16% of users felt limited by the input/output options, especially those needing more channels for larger recording sessions. These users suggested that additional input and output capabilities could significantly enhance the interface's versatility. 84% Phantom Power 87% of users appreciated the inclusion of phantom power on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, enabling them to use condenser microphones effectively. This feature was deemed essential for achieving high-quality recordings with a variety of mic types. 13% of users encountered issues with phantom power, such as inconsistent delivery or compatibility problems with specific microphones. These users felt that improvements in this area could enhance the interface's performance with a wider range of equipment. 87% USB-C Connectivity 89% of users were pleased with the USB-C connectivity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Audio Interface, noting the faster data transfer and improved power efficiency. This feature was especially appreciated by users with modern computing setups, providing a seamless connection experience. 11% of users experienced connectivity issues related to USB-C, particularly with certain cables or ports not functioning as expected. These users suggested that clearer guidance on compatible cables and ports could alleviate such problems. 89% Overall Satisfaction 88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing it as a reliable and high-performance tool for their audio needs. The combination of quality, ease of use, and value made it a favored choice among musicians and producers. 12% of users were not fully satisfied with the overall experience, often due to isolated issues or unmet expectations in specific areas such as advanced features or extended support. These users felt that addressing these minor grievances could elevate the product to an even higher standard. 88% Recording Quality 91% of users were highly satisfied with the recording quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted its ability to capture detailed and accurate audio, making it suitable for various applications from podcasts to music production. 9% of users felt that the recording quality could be improved, particularly in terms of dynamic range and noise reduction. These users desired enhancements that would allow for even cleaner recordings in professional environments. 91% Monitor Control 86% of users appreciated the monitor control features of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, particularly the direct monitor switch and volume control. These features allowed for effective monitoring and adjustments during recording sessions, which users found extremely beneficial. 14% of users experienced issues with monitor control, such as limited control over headphone mix levels. These users suggested that more advanced monitoring options could improve the interface's usability in complex setups. 86% Updates and Support 80% of users were satisfied with the updates and support provided for the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the ongoing driver updates and support resources available, which helped maintain the interface's performance over time. 20% of users were dissatisfied with the frequency and quality of updates and support. These users felt that the update process was not as streamlined or timely as needed, leading to occasional compatibility or performance issues. 80% Product Longevity 87% of users were satisfied with the product longevity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, reporting that it remained functional and reliable over extended periods of use. This aspect contributed to users' confidence in their investment. 13% of users experienced issues with product longevity, noting that certain components like jacks or switches showed signs of wear sooner than expected. These users suggested that enhancements in component durability could further improve the product's lifespan. 87% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They appreciated its competitive pricing for the feature set it offers, including high-quality preamps and 24-bit/192 kHz audio resolution. Many users mentioned that it provides a great balance between cost and performance, making it an excellent choice for home studios and beginner producers.

15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to expectations that were not met regarding advanced features available in more expensive interfaces. Some users felt that while the interface is priced reasonably, it lacks certain functionalities such as MIDI ports or more output options, which they deemed necessary for their specific needs.

85%
Quality of Materials

78% of users were pleased with the quality of materials used in the PreSonus Studio 24c. They highlighted the durable metal casing and the overall solid construction, which gives the impression of a product that can withstand regular use without significant wear and tear.

22% of users were not satisfied with the quality of materials. Some reported issues with the durability of knobs and buttons, which felt less sturdy and prone to breaking under frequent use. This led to concerns over the longevity of the interface's components.

78%
Sound Quality

90% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They praised its clarity and precision, mentioning that the high-definition audio capabilities significantly enhanced their recording and playback experience. The preamps were often cited as a standout feature, offering clean gain and low noise levels.

10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, noting occasional issues with noise interference and less than optimal performance at higher gain settings. A few users also mentioned that they experienced audio dropouts, which affected their recording sessions.

90%
Ease of Use

87% of users found the PreSonus Studio 24c easy to use, particularly appreciating its plug-and-play functionality and intuitive controls. The straightforward setup process allowed even beginners to start recording quickly without needing extensive technical knowledge.

13% of users found the interface less user-friendly than expected. Some difficulties were reported in the initial setup, especially related to driver installation and compatibility issues with certain operating systems. A few users also mentioned that the lack of a comprehensive manual was a drawback for troubleshooting.

87%
Portability

82% of users were satisfied with the portability of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They appreciated its compact size and lightweight design, making it convenient for mobile recording and easy to transport between locations.

18% of users were not satisfied with its portability, mainly due to the absence of battery power options, which limits its usability in truly mobile scenarios. Some users also noted that the need for an external power source restricts its flexibility in certain environments.

82%
Compatibility

84% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the PreSonus Studio 24c across different operating systems and DAWs. Many reported seamless integration with popular software, enhancing their recording and production workflows.

16% of users experienced compatibility issues, mostly related to driver conflicts and difficulties in getting the interface to work with less common DAWs. Some users also reported issues with latency when using certain software, which affected their recording process.

84%
Customer Support

75% of users were happy with the customer support provided by PreSonus. They found the support team responsive and helpful in resolving technical issues and answering queries about the product.

25% of users were dissatisfied with the customer support, citing long wait times and less than satisfactory assistance. Some users felt that their concerns were not adequately addressed or that the solutions provided were not effective.

75%
Durability

80% of users were satisfied with the durability of the PreSonus Studio 24c, noting that the robust construction and quality materials give it a long lifespan, even with frequent use.

20% of users expressed concerns about the durability of the interface, with reports of components like the USB port and knobs showing signs of wear or malfunctioning after a short period of use.

80%
Design

88% of users appreciated the design of the PreSonus Studio 24c, noting its sleek, modern look and intuitive layout that enhances user experience. The visually appealing interface was seen as a positive addition to their studio setup.

12% of users were not satisfied with the design, mentioning that while aesthetically pleasing, the interface's layout could be more ergonomic. Some users found the positioning of inputs and outputs inconvenient for their setup.

88%
Latency

86% of users reported satisfaction with the low latency performance of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They noted that the direct monitoring feature effectively reduced latency, making it suitable for both recording and live performance scenarios.

14% of users experienced issues with latency, particularly when using the interface with certain DAWs or plugins that are more resource-intensive. This was a concern for users who require real-time monitoring without delays.

86%
Input/Output Options

77% of users were content with the input/output options available on the PreSonus Studio 24c, finding the combination of XLR and line inputs adequate for most basic recording needs.

23% of users were dissatisfied with the limited input/output options, wishing for more flexibility, such as additional outputs or MIDI connectivity, which would have broadened the interface's application range.

77%
Software Bundled

82% of users were satisfied with the software bundled with the PreSonus Studio 24c, particularly appreciating the inclusion of Studio One Artist DAW, which provided a comprehensive suite of recording tools.

18% of users found the bundled software lacking or difficult to use. Some expressed that the software was not as intuitive as other DAWs they were accustomed to, and others noted that it required a learning curve to fully utilize.

82%
Preamp Quality

88% of users praised the preamp quality in the PreSonus Studio 24c, noting that the XMAX-L preamps deliver excellent sound clarity and headroom, enhancing the overall audio quality of their recordings.

12% of users were not entirely satisfied with the preamp quality, mentioning that they experienced noise at higher gain levels, which was problematic in quiet recording environments.

88%
Build Quality

83% of users were satisfied with the build quality, appreciating the sturdy metal chassis and solid construction that make the PreSonus Studio 24c feel like a premium product.

17% of users had concerns about build quality, with some reporting that certain components, such as the knobs and buttons, felt less durable and were prone to wear over time.

83%
Driver Stability

79% of users were satisfied with the driver stability, mentioning that once installed, the interface operated smoothly without frequent crashes or disconnections, ensuring reliable performance.

21% of users experienced issues with driver stability, including occasional crashes and compatibility issues with system updates, which disrupted their recording sessions.

79%
Value for Beginners

91% of users, especially beginners, found the PreSonus Studio 24c to be of great value, citing its ease of use and comprehensive feature set as ideal for those starting in audio production.

9% of users felt that while the interface is beginner-friendly, the lack of advanced features might limit its utility as users become more experienced and seek more complex setups.

91%
USB Type-C Connectivity

85% of users appreciated the USB Type-C connectivity, noting faster data transfer speeds and reliable connectivity, which enhanced their overall user experience.

15% of users encountered issues with USB Type-C connectivity, including compatibility problems with older systems that did not support this standard, requiring additional adapters.

85%
Software Updates

76% of users were satisfied with the frequency and quality of software updates provided by PreSonus, which addressed bugs and added new features, improving the interface's functionality over time.

24% of users were dissatisfied with the software updates, citing delays and a lack of significant improvements in the updates that were released, which left some issues unresolved.

76%
Aesthetic Appeal

89% of users were impressed with the aesthetic appeal of the PreSonus Studio 24c, highlighting its modern design and sleek finish, which made it a visually attractive addition to their studio setup.

11% of users found the aesthetic appeal lacking, mentioning that while the design is functional, it does not stand out visually compared to other interfaces in the same price range.

89%
Overall Satisfaction

87% of users reported overall satisfaction with the PreSonus Studio 24c, praising its combination of performance, features, and price point. Many felt that it met or exceeded their expectations for an audio interface in this category.

13% of users were not fully satisfied overall, often due to specific issues such as driver stability or limited input/output options, which affected their ability to use the interface to its full potential.

87%

Purchase Value

85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the balance between affordability and functionality, making it an excellent choice for both beginners and professionals. Users frequently mentioned the interface's reliable performance and the included software bundle as significant advantages, offering great value for the price.

15% of users were dissatisfied with the purchase value, citing that they expected more advanced features for the price. Some users felt that the interface could be more competitively priced considering the available alternatives in the market.

85%
Quality of Materials

90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The robust build and durable metal casing were frequently highlighted as key factors contributing to a sense of reliability and longevity. Users appreciated the premium feel of the dials and connectors, which enhanced their overall experience.

10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of materials, noting that some components felt slightly less durable over time. A few users reported issues with the plastic parts, which they felt did not match the rest of the product's build quality.

90%
Ease of Use

88% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface easy to use. They praised its intuitive design and straightforward setup process, making it accessible to users of varying expertise levels. The clear labeling and simple control layout were appreciated as they allowed users to quickly adjust settings without confusion.

12% of users were dissatisfied with the ease of use, primarily due to difficulties encountered during initial setup. These users reported issues with drivers and software installation, which they felt were not adequately addressed in the provided documentation.

88%
Sound Quality

92% of users were impressed with the sound quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, noting its clear and crisp audio output as a standout feature. Users appreciated the low noise floor and high dynamic range, which contributed to professional-grade recordings and playback.

8% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, mentioning occasional latency issues and minor distortion at high volumes. Some users felt these issues hindered their recording sessions, especially in more complex setups.

92%
Compatibility

87% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing its seamless integration with various DAWs and operating systems as a major advantage. Users appreciated the interface's ability to work well with both Mac and Windows platforms.

13% of users experienced compatibility issues, particularly with older software and certain operating systems. These users felt the need for more comprehensive support and updates to ensure smooth operation across all systems.

87%
Portability

85% of users praised the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, highlighting its compact size and lightweight design. This made it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions or gigs, which was a significant plus for users frequently on the move.

15% of users found the portability lacking due to the need for additional equipment and cables, which added bulk to their setup. Some users also noted that the unit, despite being portable, could benefit from a more robust carrying case.

85%
Durability

88% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often commenting on its sturdy construction. Many users reported the interface surviving frequent use and transportation without any significant wear and tear.

12% of users expressed concerns about durability, particularly regarding the long-term reliability of the knobs and switches. Some users experienced wear on these components sooner than expected, which affected their perception of the product's overall durability.

88%
Aesthetics

90% of users were pleased with the aesthetics of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often mentioning its sleek and modern design. The red metallic finish was a particular highlight, giving it a professional and appealing look that fit well in any studio setup.

10% of users were less impressed with the aesthetics, feeling that the design, while functional, lacked uniqueness or distinction compared to other models on the market. Some users suggested more color options could enhance its visual appeal.

90%
Customer Support

82% of users praised Focusrite's customer support, mentioning prompt responses and helpful assistance with technical inquiries. Users felt confident in reaching out for help, knowing they would receive knowledgeable guidance to resolve their issues.

18% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses and unhelpful troubleshooting advice. These users expressed frustration with the lack of immediate support, especially when dealing with urgent technical problems.

82%
Latency

89% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found it capable of handling real-time monitoring and recording without noticeable delays, which was crucial for professional audio work.

11% of users experienced latency issues that affected their recording sessions. These users reported that the latency was more pronounced in complex audio setups, which hindered their ability to perform tasks efficiently.

89%
Driver Stability

83% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The majority of users reported consistent performance with minimal crashes or connectivity issues, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions.

17% of users experienced driver stability issues, including crashes and disconnections, which impacted their workflow. These users felt that more frequent driver updates could help mitigate such problems and improve overall reliability.

83%
Preamp Quality

91% of users were highly satisfied with the preamp quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted the clean and transparent sound the preamps provided, which allowed for accurate capture of vocals and instruments without coloration.

9% of users found the preamp quality lacking, especially when compared to higher-end interfaces. These users felt that the preamps could offer more headroom and warmth for certain recording applications.

91%
Software Bundle

86% of users appreciated the software bundle included with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the DAW and plugin offerings to be a valuable addition that enhanced their recording and production capabilities right out of the box.

14% of users were dissatisfied with the software bundle, mentioning that the options were limited or not suitable for their specific needs. Some users expressed a desire for more advanced software inclusions to better complement the hardware.

86%
Input/Output Options

84% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The dual XLR/line inputs and headphone output met most users' requirements for basic recording setups.

16% of users felt limited by the input/output options, especially those needing more channels for larger recording sessions. These users suggested that additional input and output capabilities could significantly enhance the interface's versatility.

84%
Phantom Power

87% of users appreciated the inclusion of phantom power on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, enabling them to use condenser microphones effectively. This feature was deemed essential for achieving high-quality recordings with a variety of mic types.

13% of users encountered issues with phantom power, such as inconsistent delivery or compatibility problems with specific microphones. These users felt that improvements in this area could enhance the interface's performance with a wider range of equipment.

87%
USB-C Connectivity

89% of users were pleased with the USB-C connectivity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Audio Interface, noting the faster data transfer and improved power efficiency. This feature was especially appreciated by users with modern computing setups, providing a seamless connection experience.

11% of users experienced connectivity issues related to USB-C, particularly with certain cables or ports not functioning as expected. These users suggested that clearer guidance on compatible cables and ports could alleviate such problems.

89%
Overall Satisfaction

88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing it as a reliable and high-performance tool for their audio needs. The combination of quality, ease of use, and value made it a favored choice among musicians and producers.

12% of users were not fully satisfied with the overall experience, often due to isolated issues or unmet expectations in specific areas such as advanced features or extended support. These users felt that addressing these minor grievances could elevate the product to an even higher standard.

88%
Recording Quality

91% of users were highly satisfied with the recording quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted its ability to capture detailed and accurate audio, making it suitable for various applications from podcasts to music production.

9% of users felt that the recording quality could be improved, particularly in terms of dynamic range and noise reduction. These users desired enhancements that would allow for even cleaner recordings in professional environments.

91%
Monitor Control

86% of users appreciated the monitor control features of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, particularly the direct monitor switch and volume control. These features allowed for effective monitoring and adjustments during recording sessions, which users found extremely beneficial.

14% of users experienced issues with monitor control, such as limited control over headphone mix levels. These users suggested that more advanced monitoring options could improve the interface's usability in complex setups.

86%
Updates and Support

80% of users were satisfied with the updates and support provided for the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the ongoing driver updates and support resources available, which helped maintain the interface's performance over time.

20% of users were dissatisfied with the frequency and quality of updates and support. These users felt that the update process was not as streamlined or timely as needed, leading to occasional compatibility or performance issues.

80%
Product Longevity

87% of users were satisfied with the product longevity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, reporting that it remained functional and reliable over extended periods of use. This aspect contributed to users' confidence in their investment.

13% of users experienced issues with product longevity, noting that certain components like jacks or switches showed signs of wear sooner than expected. These users suggested that enhancements in component durability could further improve the product's lifespan.

87%

Pros:
High-resolution 24-bit/192 kHz audio quality. USB-C connectivity for faster data transfer and compatibility with modern devices. Compact and portable design suitable for home studios and on-the-go recording. Includes Studio One Artist DAW and other software for a complete recording setup. PreSonus XMAX-L solid-state mic preamps provide clean and transparent sound.	High-quality preamps for clear audio capture. USB-C connectivity for faster data transfer and compatibility. Compact and portable design. Low latency monitoring. Easy setup and user-friendly interface.

Cons:
Limited to 2 input and 2 output channels, which may not be enough for larger projects. No built-in DSP effects or processing. Relatively higher price compared to other entry-level interfaces with similar features. Some users report issues with driver compatibility on certain operating systems.	Limited to two inputs, which may not be enough for some users. No MIDI input/output. Higher price point compared to some competitors. Requires external power when used with some devices.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	2
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line/Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Host Connection
1x USB-C (Class-Compliant)	1x USB-C
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.13 or Later (64-Bit Only) Windows 10 or Later (64-Bit Only)	macOS Windows
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface both offer robust features suited for high-quality audio recording and production, but they do have some differences worth noting.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen) provides 2 inputs and 2 outputs at a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz and 24-bit resolution. It includes 2 microphone inputs, which are balanced XLR 3-pin connectors. Additionally, it features 2x 1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced line/Hi-Z inputs on the front panel and 2x 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs. For monitoring, it provides a 1/4" TRS headphone output on the front panel. The device connects to the host using a USB-C interface and is compatible with both macOS and Windows operating systems. It is bus-powered via USB but also has the option for a USB power adapter, which is not included.
On the other hand, the PreSonus Studio 24c also offers 2 inputs and 2 outputs at the same 192 kHz/24-bit resolution. It features 2 microphone preamps that utilize combo XLR-1/4" TRS connectors for balanced/unbalanced mic/line/Hi-Z input. Its analog audio I/O includes 2x 1/4" TRS balanced line/monitor outputs and a 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output. It connects to the host via USB-C and supports macOS 10.13 or later (64-bit only) and Windows 10 or later (64-bit only). Like the Scarlett, it is powered through USB bus power.
While both interfaces are similar in terms of channels, sampling rate, and bit depth, the PreSonus Studio 24c offers the advantage of combo XLR-1/4" TRS inputs, which provide more flexibility for connecting various types of audio sources. Both units are USB-C compatible and bus-powered, ensuring easy and efficient connectivity. The Scarlett 2i2 offers a slightly more diverse range of analog I/O options, whereas the Studio 24c's combo inputs offer a simpler, more versatile input solution. Both are highly compatible with modern operating systems, ensuring they are suitable for professional and home studio environments.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	2
Input Level Adjustment
2x Knob	2x Knob
Expansion Slots

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface share several similarities in their specifications, particularly in terms of input and output channels, sampling rates, and input level adjustments. Both interfaces offer 2 analog inputs and 2 analog outputs at a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz and a bit depth of 24-bit, ensuring high-quality audio recording and playback. Additionally, each device features 2 microphone inputs and input level adjustments via two knobs, providing users with precise control over their input levels.
Despite these similarities, there are notable differences as well. The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen) does not include built-in DSP (Digital Signal Processing), whereas the PreSonus Studio 24c also lacks this feature, maintaining parity in this regard. Neither interface includes built-in microphones or expansion slots, which aligns them as straightforward, user-friendly devices suitable for basic home studio setups or portable recording needs.
In summary, both the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen) and the PreSonus Studio 24c are well-matched in terms of their core specifications, offering high-resolution audio, dual microphone inputs, and user-friendly input level adjustments. They are both designed to provide essential functionalities for musicians and producers who require reliable and high-quality audio interfaces without additional built-in DSP or expansion options.

Signal Processing
Gain/Trim Range
Inputs: 50 dB	Mic/Line Inputs: Up to +69 dB Hi-Z Inputs: 62 dB

When comparing the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) to the PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface, several key features stand out.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) offers a significant gain/trim range across its inputs. For mic/line inputs, it provides up to +69 dB, which is notably high, and for Hi-Z inputs, it offers up to 62 dB. This extensive gain range makes it highly versatile for a variety of audio sources, accommodating both quiet and loud inputs with ease.
In contrast, the PreSonus Studio 24c provides a gain/trim range of 50 dB for its inputs. While this is sufficient for many standard recording situations, it is considerably lower than what the Scarlett 2i2 offers, potentially limiting its flexibility with certain audio sources that require more gain.
Additionally, the PreSonus Studio 24c lacks several features that might be critical for some users. It does not include a pad, which can be useful for managing high-level signals to prevent clipping. Moreover, it does not offer a high-pass filter, which can help in reducing low-frequency noise and rumble. The absence of solo/mute functionality also means that users cannot isolate or mute channels directly on the interface, which could be a drawback for certain monitoring and recording workflows.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) stands out with its higher gain/trim range and the versatility it provides. Meanwhile, the PreSonus Studio 24c, while still a capable interface, offers a lower gain range and does not include some additional features such as a pad, high-pass filter, and solo/mute functionality, which might be important for some users depending on their specific needs and recording environment.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line/Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Phantom Power
48 V, Selectable On/Off (Applied to All Inputs)	48 V, Selectable On/Off
Digital Audio I/O

Host Connection
1x USB-C (Class-Compliant)	1x USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0	USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)
	1x USB-C (Power Input)
Sync I/O

Network I/O

MIDI I/O
1x DIN 5-Pin Input 1x DIN 5-Pin Output

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface are both high-quality audio interfaces designed for recording and music production, but they have distinct differences in their specifications that might cater to different user needs.
Analog Audio I/O: The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 features 2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Inputs, 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Inputs on the front panel, 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Outputs, and 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output on the front panel. In contrast, the PreSonus Studio 24c offers 2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs, 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line/Monitor Outputs, and 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output. The key difference here is that the PreSonus includes combo inputs that can handle both XLR and 1/4" TRS connections, which offers greater flexibility.
Phantom Power: Both interfaces provide 48V phantom power, which is selectable on/off. The PreSonus Studio 24c specifies that its phantom power is applied to all inputs with a current of 10 mA, while the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 does not specify the current but allows for selectable phantom power as well.
Digital Audio I/O: Neither the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 nor the PreSonus Studio 24c features digital audio inputs or outputs, which may be a consideration for users needing digital connectivity.
Host Connection: Both interfaces use a USB-C connection for their host connection protocol and adhere to USB 2.0 standards. The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 also includes an additional USB-C port for power input, whereas the PreSonus Studio 24c does not have a separate power input.
Sync I/O and Network I/O: Neither interface includes Sync I/O or Network I/O capabilities, which keeps their designs simple and focused on analog and USB connectivity.
MIDI I/O: A significant differentiator is that the PreSonus Studio 24c includes MIDI I/O, with 1x DIN 5-Pin Input and 1x DIN 5-Pin Output, making it a more versatile choice for users who need MIDI connectivity. The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 lacks MIDI I/O, which might be a limitation for users looking to integrate MIDI devices into their setup.
Wireless: Neither interface offers wireless capabilities, focusing instead on wired connections for reliability and performance.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) is a robust choice for users who prioritize high-quality analog audio inputs and outputs, particularly those who do not require MIDI connectivity. On the other hand, the PreSonus Studio 24c stands out with its combo inputs and built-in MIDI I/O, making it a more versatile option for users needing flexibility in input types and MIDI functionality.

Performance
Frequency Response
Mic Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.3 dB (Unity Gain) Hi-Z Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.1 dB (Unity Gain) Monitor Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.3 dB (Unity Gain) Headphone Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.5 dB (Unity Gain)	XLR Mic Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB 1/4" Line Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.05 dB 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.15 dB
Maximum Input Level
Mic Inputs: +10 dBu (Min Gain) Hi-Z Inputs: +19 dBu (Min Gain)	XLR Mic: 16 dBu 1/4" Line: 22 dBu 1/4" Hi-Z: 12 dBu
Maximum Output Level
Monitor Outputs: +10 dBu (Balanced)	1/4" Line: +16 dBu
Headphone Output Power
47 mW per Channel into 56 Ohms (Max)	1/4": 32 mW into 33 Ohms 22 mW into 300 Ohms
Impedance
Mic Inputs: 1.4 Kilohms Hi-Z Inputs: 750 Kilohms Headphone Outputs: 32 to 300 Ohms	XLR Mic Inputs: 3 Kilohms 1/4" Line Inputs: 60 Kilohms 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohms 1/4" Line Outputs: 100 Ohms 1/4" Headphone Outputs: < 50 Ohm
Dynamic Range
AD/DA Converters: 108 dB Mic Inputs: 106 dBA Hi-Z Inputs: 105 dBA Monitor Outputs: 104 dB (Unweighted) Headphone Outputs: 83 dBA	XLR Mic Inputs: 116 dBA 1/4" Line Inputs: 115.2 dBA 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 113 dBA 1/4" Line Outputs: 120 dB 1/4" Headphone: 112 dB (at 33 Ohms) 115 dB (at 300 Ohms) Digital A/D Converters: 120 dB Digital D/A Converters: 130 dBA
THD+N
Mic Inputs: 0.004% (1 kHz, Min Gain, at -1 dBFS) Hi-Z Inputs: 0.002% (1 kHz, Min Gain) Monitor Outputs: 0.001% (1 kHz, Unity Gain, at -1 dBFS) Headphone Outputs: 0.01% (1 kHz, at 0 dBFS)	XLR Mic Inputs: -100 dB (at 8 dB Gain) 1/4" Line Inputs: -100 dB (at 8 dB Gain) 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: -80 dB (at Minimum Gain) 1/4" Line Outputs: -109 dB 1/4" Headphone Outputs: -99 dB (at 33 Ohms) -108 dB (at 300 Ohms) Digital A/D Converters: -110 dB Digital D/A Converters: -115 dB
EIN
Mic Inputs: -126 dBu A-Weighted	XLR Mic Inputs: -127 dBu A-Weighted

When comparing the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface, several key features stand out, each with their own strengths and specifications.
In terms of frequency response, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers impressive precision across its input types. The XLR Mic Inputs boast a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz within ±0.06 dB, while the 1/4" Line Inputs offer a slightly tighter ±0.05 dB variance. The 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs show a broader ±0.15 dB. In comparison, the PreSonus Studio 24c’s Mic Inputs have a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz with a ±0.3 dB variance, and its Hi-Z Inputs provide a tighter ±0.1 dB. For Monitor Outputs, the PreSonus maintains a ±0.3 dB variance, and its Headphone Outputs range within ±0.5 dB.
Regarding maximum input levels, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 supports up to 16 dBu for XLR Mic, 22 dBu for 1/4" Line, and 12 dBu for 1/4" Hi-Z inputs. The PreSonus Studio 24c offers a maximum of +10 dBu for Mic Inputs (at minimum gain) and +19 dBu for Hi-Z Inputs. For maximum output levels, the Scarlett 2i2 delivers a robust +16 dBu for 1/4" Line Outputs, while the PreSonus provides +10 dBu for Balanced Monitor Outputs.
The headphone output power of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 varies with impedance, delivering 32 mW into 33 Ohms and 22 mW into 300 Ohms. The PreSonus Studio 24c, on the other hand, provides a higher power output of 47 mW per channel into 56 Ohms.
When it comes to impedance, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 has higher values across most inputs and outputs, with 3 Kilohms for XLR Mic Inputs, 60 Kilohms for 1/4" Line Inputs, and 1 Megohm for 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs. The 1/4" Line Outputs have 100 Ohms, and the 1/4" Headphone Outputs are less than 50 Ohms. PreSonus offers 1.4 Kilohms for Mic Inputs and 750 Kilohms for Hi-Z Inputs, while the headphone outputs range from 32 to 300 Ohms.
Analyzing dynamic range, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 excels with 116 dBA for XLR Mic Inputs, 115.2 dBA for 1/4" Line Inputs, and 113 dBA for 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs. The Line Outputs provide a remarkable 120 dB, and the headphone outputs range between 112 dB (at 33 Ohms) and 115 dB (at 300 Ohms). The digital A/D and D/A converters offer 120 dB and 130 dBA respectively. PreSonus exhibits a dynamic range of 108 dB for AD/DA converters, 106 dBA for Mic Inputs, 105 dBA for Hi-Z Inputs, 104 dB for Monitor Outputs, and 83 dBA for Headphone Outputs.
Total Harmonic Distortion plus Noise (THD+N) values for the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 reveal -100 dB for both XLR Mic and 1/4" Line Inputs at 8 dB Gain, -80 dB for 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs at minimum gain, -109 dB for 1/4" Line Outputs, and -99 dB (at 33 Ohms) to -108 dB (at 300 Ohms) for 1/4" Headphone Outputs. Digital A/D and D/A converters exhibit -110 dB and -115 dB respectively. The PreSonus Studio 24c shows 0.004% THD+N for Mic Inputs, 0.002% for Hi-Z Inputs, 0.001% for Monitor Outputs, and 0.01% for Headphone Outputs.
Finally, the Equivalent Input Noise (EIN) for the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 is -127 dBu A-Weighted for XLR Mic Inputs, slightly edging out the PreSonus Studio 24c, which has an EIN of -126 dBu A-Weighted for Mic Inputs.
Overall, both interfaces offer robust features and high-quality specifications, with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 showing slightly superior performance in certain areas such as dynamic range and frequency response variance. The PreSonus Studio 24c, however, provides commendable performance with slightly different strengths, especially in headphone output power.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
Up to 192 kHz (AD/DA Conversion)	44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 / 176.4 / 192 kHz
Bit Depths
Up to 24-Bit (AD/DA Conversion)	24-Bit
Sync Sources
Internal	Internal

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface share several similarities and differences in their specifications, particularly concerning sample rates, bit depths, and sync sources.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers a range of sample rates, including 44.1 kHz, 48 kHz, 88.2 kHz, 96 kHz, 176.4 kHz, and 192 kHz. This broad selection provides flexibility for various recording situations, ensuring high-quality audio capture at different levels of resolution. In terms of bit depth, the Scarlett 2i2 supports 24-bit, which is a standard in professional audio interfaces, ensuring detailed and dynamic audio recording. Additionally, the Scarlett 2i2 uses an internal sync source, which is typical for maintaining stable timing and synchronization during the recording process.
On the other hand, the PreSonus Studio 24c also supports sample rates up to 192 kHz, matching the maximum sample rate capability of the Scarlett 2i2. However, it does not offer sample rate conversion, meaning it operates at the set sample rate without converting between different rates. The Studio 24c supports bit depths up to 24-bit for AD/DA conversion, aligning with the common industry standard for professional audio quality. Similar to the Scarlett 2i2, the Studio 24c uses an internal sync source to ensure stable audio performance.
In summary, both the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) and the PreSonus Studio 24c provide high-quality audio recording capabilities with support for sample rates up to 192 kHz and 24-bit depth. They both use internal sync sources to maintain stability during recordings. The primary distinction lies in the range of selectable sample rates, with the Scarlett 2i2 offering a more extensive range, while the Studio 24c does not include sample rate conversion capabilities.

Audio Storage & Playback

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.13 or Later (64-Bit Only) Windows 10 or Later (64-Bit Only)	macOS Windows

When comparing the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface, several key features stand out.
OS Compatibility: The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) is compatible with both macOS and Windows operating systems. Additionally, it supports iPadOS, which makes it versatile for mobile recording setups. In contrast, the PreSonus Studio 24c is compatible with macOS 10.13 or later (64-bit only) and Windows 10 or later (64-bit only). However, it does not support mobile devices.
Processor and System Requirements: The PreSonus Studio 24c specifies more detailed system requirements compared to the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2. For the PreSonus, a Mac or PC with an Intel Core i3 or AMD equivalent processor is required. It also recommends having 4 GB of RAM, with 8 GB being preferable, and a minimum display resolution of 1366 x 768. Additionally, 30 GB of storage is required for the software and driver downloads. Focusrite does not detail these specific requirements, suggesting it may be more flexible across different hardware configurations.
Mobile Device Compatibility: The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 stands out with its compatibility with iPadOS, making it a strong contender for users who want to integrate their mobile devices into their recording setup. The PreSonus Studio 24c, on the other hand, does not offer any mobile device compatibility.
Additional Hardware and Internet Requirements: Both interfaces require a USB connection, but the PreSonus Studio 24c includes a USB cable and requires either a USB 2.0 port or a USB-C port. Additionally, the PreSonus interface requires an internet connection for registration and software/driver downloads. The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 does not specify these additional requirements in the provided information, potentially making it simpler to set up and use out of the box.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) offers broader OS compatibility, including support for iPadOS, making it more versatile for mobile recording. The PreSonus Studio 24c, while having more detailed system requirements and no mobile compatibility, includes necessary hardware like the USB cable and mandates an internet connection for setup, which may appeal to users who prefer having everything included and specified upfront.

Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface both have distinct power requirements that cater to different user needs and preferences.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) offers versatile power options. It can be powered directly via USB bus power, which is ideal for users who prefer a straightforward, cable-only setup. Additionally, it supports an external USB power adapter (though this is not included in the package) and an AC/DC power adapter rated at 5 VDC and 900 mA. This flexibility ensures that the Scarlett 2i2 can maintain optimal performance in various settings, whether in a home studio or on the go. The power consumption of this device is 4.5 watts, making it relatively efficient in its power usage.
On the other hand, the PreSonus Studio 24c relies solely on USB bus power for its operation. This makes it extremely convenient for users who need a portable and easy-to-set-up interface without the hassle of additional power adapters. The reliance on USB bus power means that the Studio 24c can draw all the necessary power directly from the connected computer, simplifying the setup process and reducing the number of cables required.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) provides a more flexible power solution, accommodating both USB bus power and optional external power adapters, which could be beneficial in various usage scenarios. In contrast, the PreSonus Studio 24c emphasizes simplicity and portability with its sole dependence on USB bus power, making it an ideal choice for users who prioritize a minimalistic and mobile setup.

Physical
Dimensions
7 x 5.5 x 1.75" / 17.8 x 14 x 4.45 cm	7.1 x 4.6 x 1.87" / 18 x 11.7 x 4.75 cm
Weight
2.0 lb / 0.9 kg	1.3 lb / 595.0 g

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface both serve as high-quality options for audio recording and production, but they differ in several key specifications.
In terms of dimensions, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 measures 7.1 x 4.6 x 1.87 inches (18 x 11.7 x 4.75 cm), making it slightly longer and narrower compared to the PreSonus Studio 24c, which measures 7 x 5.5 x 1.75 inches (17.8 x 14 x 4.45 cm). The height of both interfaces is fairly comparable, with the PreSonus being just a bit shorter.
When it comes to weight, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 is lighter at 1.3 lb (595.0 g), whereas the PreSonus Studio 24c is heavier, weighing in at 2.0 lb (0.9 kg). This makes the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 a more portable option if weight and mobility are considerations.
Additionally, the PreSonus Studio 24c includes anti-theft features such as a Kensington Security Slot, which the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 does not offer. This could be a significant advantage for users who require additional security measures for their equipment.
Both interfaces share the common feature of USB Type-C connectivity, ensuring modern and efficient data transfer between the interface and connected devices. However, the differences in physical characteristics and additional security features might influence a user's decision based on specific needs and preferences.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
2.285 lb	1.9 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
7.8 x 7.5 x 2"	8.2 x 7 x 2.6"

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface are both highly regarded options for audio recording, but they exhibit notable differences in terms of packaging dimensions and weight.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) has a package weight of 1.9 lb and box dimensions of 8.2 x 7 x 2.6 inches. On the other hand, the PreSonus Studio 24c has a slightly heavier package weight of 2.285 lb and slightly different box dimensions of 7.8 x 7.5 x 2 inches.
These differences in weight and size may influence portability and the physical space they occupy in your setup. The Scarlett 2i2 is lighter and slightly more elongated, while the Studio 24c is a bit heavier with a marginally more compact footprint in terms of length and width, but is also slightly thinner in height. This could be a deciding factor depending on the specific needs of the user, such as ease of transport or available desk space.