M-Audio AIR 192|4 vs PreSonus Studio 24c: Which USB Audio Interface Reigns Supreme?

The PreSonus Studio 24c and the M-Audio AIR 192|4 are both high-quality 2x2 USB Type-C audio interfaces designed for desktop use, catering to musicians, podcasters, and home studio enthusiasts. Despite their similarities, each model brings unique features that may sway your decision depending on your specific needs.
The PreSonus Studio 24c boasts a robust build and delivers crystal-clear audio quality with its XMAX-L mic preamps. It supports resolutions up to 24-bit/192 kHz, ensuring professional-grade recordings. The interface includes two front-panel combo inputs with globally switched 48V phantom power, suitable for both microphones and instruments. An LED metering feature provides real-time visual feedback, aiding in optimal gain staging. Additionally, the Studio 24c comes bundled with PreSonus’ Studio One Artist DAW software and the Studio Magic Plug-in Suite, providing users with a comprehensive suite of tools for music production right out of the box.
On the other hand, the M-Audio AIR 192|4 offers ultra-low latency and pristine audio fidelity, also supporting resolutions up to 24-bit/192 kHz. It features two front-panel inputs: one XLR+¼” TRS combo input and one ¼” instrument input, each with dedicated gain controls. The AIR 192|4 stands out with its sleek, modern design and high-speed USB-C connectivity. It also includes VU LED meters and a large central knob for easy control over output levels. M-Audio sweetens the deal with a software package that includes Pro Tools | First, Ableton Live Lite, and various virtual instruments and effects, providing a solid foundation for recording and production.
Both interfaces offer MIDI I/O, making them versatile for integrating with other MIDI gear. While the PreSonus Studio 24c shines with its comprehensive software suite and reliable XMAX-L preamps, the M-Audio AIR 192|4 excels in user-friendly design and low-latency performance. Ultimately, your choice may hinge on whether you prioritize bundled software and preamp quality (PreSonus) or ease of use and sleek design (M-Audio).

In-Depth Specifications and Reviews: M-Audio AIR 192|4 vs PreSonus Studio 24c

PreSonus Studio 24c

M-Audio AIR 192|4

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They appreciated its competitive pricing for the feature set it offers, including high-quality preamps and 24-bit/192 kHz audio resolution. Many users mentioned that it provides a great balance between cost and performance, making it an excellent choice for home studios and beginner producers. 15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to expectations that were not met regarding advanced features available in more expensive interfaces. Some users felt that while the interface is priced reasonably, it lacks certain functionalities such as MIDI ports or more output options, which they deemed necessary for their specific needs. 85% Quality of Materials 78% of users were pleased with the quality of materials used in the PreSonus Studio 24c. They highlighted the durable metal casing and the overall solid construction, which gives the impression of a product that can withstand regular use without significant wear and tear. 22% of users were not satisfied with the quality of materials. Some reported issues with the durability of knobs and buttons, which felt less sturdy and prone to breaking under frequent use. This led to concerns over the longevity of the interface's components. 78% Sound Quality 90% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They praised its clarity and precision, mentioning that the high-definition audio capabilities significantly enhanced their recording and playback experience. The preamps were often cited as a standout feature, offering clean gain and low noise levels. 10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, noting occasional issues with noise interference and less than optimal performance at higher gain settings. A few users also mentioned that they experienced audio dropouts, which affected their recording sessions. 90% Ease of Use 87% of users found the PreSonus Studio 24c easy to use, particularly appreciating its plug-and-play functionality and intuitive controls. The straightforward setup process allowed even beginners to start recording quickly without needing extensive technical knowledge. 13% of users found the interface less user-friendly than expected. Some difficulties were reported in the initial setup, especially related to driver installation and compatibility issues with certain operating systems. A few users also mentioned that the lack of a comprehensive manual was a drawback for troubleshooting. 87% Portability 82% of users were satisfied with the portability of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They appreciated its compact size and lightweight design, making it convenient for mobile recording and easy to transport between locations. 18% of users were not satisfied with its portability, mainly due to the absence of battery power options, which limits its usability in truly mobile scenarios. Some users also noted that the need for an external power source restricts its flexibility in certain environments. 82% Compatibility 84% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the PreSonus Studio 24c across different operating systems and DAWs. Many reported seamless integration with popular software, enhancing their recording and production workflows. 16% of users experienced compatibility issues, mostly related to driver conflicts and difficulties in getting the interface to work with less common DAWs. Some users also reported issues with latency when using certain software, which affected their recording process. 84% Customer Support 75% of users were happy with the customer support provided by PreSonus. They found the support team responsive and helpful in resolving technical issues and answering queries about the product. 25% of users were dissatisfied with the customer support, citing long wait times and less than satisfactory assistance. Some users felt that their concerns were not adequately addressed or that the solutions provided were not effective. 75% Durability 80% of users were satisfied with the durability of the PreSonus Studio 24c, noting that the robust construction and quality materials give it a long lifespan, even with frequent use. 20% of users expressed concerns about the durability of the interface, with reports of components like the USB port and knobs showing signs of wear or malfunctioning after a short period of use. 80% Design 88% of users appreciated the design of the PreSonus Studio 24c, noting its sleek, modern look and intuitive layout that enhances user experience. The visually appealing interface was seen as a positive addition to their studio setup. 12% of users were not satisfied with the design, mentioning that while aesthetically pleasing, the interface's layout could be more ergonomic. Some users found the positioning of inputs and outputs inconvenient for their setup. 88% Latency 86% of users reported satisfaction with the low latency performance of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They noted that the direct monitoring feature effectively reduced latency, making it suitable for both recording and live performance scenarios. 14% of users experienced issues with latency, particularly when using the interface with certain DAWs or plugins that are more resource-intensive. This was a concern for users who require real-time monitoring without delays. 86% Input/Output Options 77% of users were content with the input/output options available on the PreSonus Studio 24c, finding the combination of XLR and line inputs adequate for most basic recording needs. 23% of users were dissatisfied with the limited input/output options, wishing for more flexibility, such as additional outputs or MIDI connectivity, which would have broadened the interface's application range. 77% Software Bundled 82% of users were satisfied with the software bundled with the PreSonus Studio 24c, particularly appreciating the inclusion of Studio One Artist DAW, which provided a comprehensive suite of recording tools. 18% of users found the bundled software lacking or difficult to use. Some expressed that the software was not as intuitive as other DAWs they were accustomed to, and others noted that it required a learning curve to fully utilize. 82% Preamp Quality 88% of users praised the preamp quality in the PreSonus Studio 24c, noting that the XMAX-L preamps deliver excellent sound clarity and headroom, enhancing the overall audio quality of their recordings. 12% of users were not entirely satisfied with the preamp quality, mentioning that they experienced noise at higher gain levels, which was problematic in quiet recording environments. 88% Build Quality 83% of users were satisfied with the build quality, appreciating the sturdy metal chassis and solid construction that make the PreSonus Studio 24c feel like a premium product. 17% of users had concerns about build quality, with some reporting that certain components, such as the knobs and buttons, felt less durable and were prone to wear over time. 83% Driver Stability 79% of users were satisfied with the driver stability, mentioning that once installed, the interface operated smoothly without frequent crashes or disconnections, ensuring reliable performance. 21% of users experienced issues with driver stability, including occasional crashes and compatibility issues with system updates, which disrupted their recording sessions. 79% Value for Beginners 91% of users, especially beginners, found the PreSonus Studio 24c to be of great value, citing its ease of use and comprehensive feature set as ideal for those starting in audio production. 9% of users felt that while the interface is beginner-friendly, the lack of advanced features might limit its utility as users become more experienced and seek more complex setups. 91% USB Type-C Connectivity 85% of users appreciated the USB Type-C connectivity, noting faster data transfer speeds and reliable connectivity, which enhanced their overall user experience. 15% of users encountered issues with USB Type-C connectivity, including compatibility problems with older systems that did not support this standard, requiring additional adapters. 85% Software Updates 76% of users were satisfied with the frequency and quality of software updates provided by PreSonus, which addressed bugs and added new features, improving the interface's functionality over time. 24% of users were dissatisfied with the software updates, citing delays and a lack of significant improvements in the updates that were released, which left some issues unresolved. 76% Aesthetic Appeal 89% of users were impressed with the aesthetic appeal of the PreSonus Studio 24c, highlighting its modern design and sleek finish, which made it a visually attractive addition to their studio setup. 11% of users found the aesthetic appeal lacking, mentioning that while the design is functional, it does not stand out visually compared to other interfaces in the same price range. 89% Overall Satisfaction 87% of users reported overall satisfaction with the PreSonus Studio 24c, praising its combination of performance, features, and price point. Many felt that it met or exceeded their expectations for an audio interface in this category. 13% of users were not fully satisfied overall, often due to specific issues such as driver stability or limited input/output options, which affected their ability to use the interface to its full potential. 87%	Purchase Value 85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the M-Audio AIR 192\|4 Audio Interface. They appreciated the combination of affordability and features, noting that it offers excellent value for money compared to other interfaces in the same price range. Users highlighted the high-quality sound output and the inclusion of necessary inputs and outputs as key factors in their satisfaction. 15% of users were dissatisfied with the purchase value, primarily due to occasional sales and promotions that made them feel they overpaid at the time of purchase. Some also mentioned that they expected more advanced features based on the price. 85% Quality of Materials 78% of users found the quality of materials used in the M-Audio AIR 192\|4 to be satisfactory. They appreciated the sturdy build and premium feel of the device, which contributed to their confidence in its durability. Many users felt that the materials used were appropriate for a product in this price range, providing a good balance between cost and quality. 22% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of materials, citing concerns about the plastic components feeling less sturdy. Some reported issues with knobs and connectors becoming loose over time, which affected their overall perception of the product's durability. 78% Sound Quality 90% of users praised the sound quality of the M-Audio AIR 192\|4, noting clear and crisp audio output, which enhanced their recording and playback experiences. Users particularly appreciated the low noise floor and the high fidelity of the sound, which they felt was comparable to more expensive models. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the sound quality, mentioning that they experienced occasional static or interference. Some users felt that the interface did not perform well with certain types of microphones or instruments, which affected their overall experience. 90% Ease of Use 82% of users were satisfied with the ease of use of the M-Audio AIR 192\|4, highlighting its straightforward setup process and intuitive interface. Many appreciated the simplicity of the controls, which allowed them to quickly start recording without a steep learning curve. 18% of users found the interface less user-friendly, particularly citing issues with the initial setup and driver installation. Some users experienced difficulties in configuring the device with their preferred software, which led to frustration. 82% Software Compatibility 75% of users were pleased with the software compatibility of the M-Audio AIR 192\|4, noting that it worked seamlessly with popular DAWs and recording software. Many users appreciated the bundled software, which added value to their purchase. 25% of users were dissatisfied with software compatibility, reporting challenges in configuring the interface with specific DAWs or experiencing limited functionality with older software versions. Some users faced latency issues that hindered their recording process. 75% Design 88% of users were satisfied with the design of the M-Audio AIR 192\|4, commending its sleek and modern look. The compact size and layout of controls were appreciated for their convenience, making the interface easy to integrate into various setups. 12% of users were dissatisfied with the design, mainly due to the placement of certain controls which they found inconvenient. Some users felt that the interface was too compact, leading to potential issues when connecting multiple devices. 88% Portability 80% of users were satisfied with the portability of the M-Audio AIR 192\|4, appreciating its lightweight and compact design. This made it easy for them to transport the interface for mobile recordings or to different studio locations. 20% of users were dissatisfied with portability, noting that the lack of a protective case or bag made it susceptible to damage during transport. Some users felt that additional features, such as battery power, would enhance its portability. 80% Durability 77% of users were happy with the durability of the M-Audio AIR 192\|4, stating that it withstood regular use without showing significant wear and tear. They felt confident in its ability to last over time given its solid construction. 23% of users were dissatisfied with durability, citing issues with components such as knobs and connectors becoming loose or malfunctioning after prolonged use. Some users expected a more robust build quality for extended durability. 77% Customer Support 70% of users were satisfied with the customer support offered by M-Audio, appreciating the prompt responses and helpful assistance they received when encountering issues with the AIR 192\|4. Many users felt that the support team was knowledgeable and provided effective solutions. 30% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, mentioning delays in response times or difficulty in obtaining satisfactory resolutions to their problems. Some users felt that the support staff lacked technical expertise, leading to unresolved issues. 70% Driver Stability 73% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the M-Audio AIR 192\|4, reporting smooth operation and minimal issues with crashes or disconnects. Many users appreciated the regular updates that helped maintain compatibility with various operating systems. 27% of users were dissatisfied with driver stability, experiencing frequent crashes or disconnects during use. Some users reported issues with installing or updating drivers, which affected their ability to use the interface effectively. 73% Latency 81% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the M-Audio AIR 192\|4, noting that it allowed for seamless real-time monitoring and recording. This feature was particularly appreciated by musicians and producers who required precise timing. 19% of users were dissatisfied with latency, experiencing delays that affected their recording sessions. Some users found that latency increased with certain software or when using higher sample rates, which impacted their workflow. 81% Input/Output Options 84% of users were satisfied with the input and output options provided by the M-Audio AIR 192\|4, appreciating the versatility and ability to connect various audio equipment. The interface's combination of XLR and instrument inputs was particularly valued. 16% of users were dissatisfied with the input/output options, feeling limited by the number of available connections. Some users wished for additional outputs for more complex setups or found the existing options insufficient for their needs. 84% Bundled Software 76% of users were pleased with the bundled software that came with the M-Audio AIR 192\|4, finding it useful for getting started with recording and production. Users appreciated the added value and variety of tools included in the package. 24% of users were dissatisfied with the bundled software, expressing that it was either too basic or not compatible with their preferred workflow. Some users experienced issues with software installation or activation, which hindered their experience. 76% Aesthetics 86% of users were satisfied with the aesthetics of the M-Audio AIR 192\|4, complimenting its sleek design and professional appearance. The modern look was appreciated by those who valued both functionality and style in their audio equipment. 14% of users were dissatisfied with the aesthetics, feeling that the design was too minimalistic or not aligned with their personal taste. Some users preferred a more traditional look for their recording equipment. 86% Setup Process 79% of users were satisfied with the setup process of the M-Audio AIR 192\|4, finding it straightforward and easy to follow. The clear instructions and quick installation allowed users to begin using the interface with minimal hassle. 21% of users were dissatisfied with the setup process, encountering complications during driver installation or setup with their DAW. Some users found the instructions unclear or lacking in detail, leading to a frustrating experience. 79% Integration with DAWs 74% of users were satisfied with the integration of the M-Audio AIR 192\|4 with various DAWs, noting seamless connection and functionality with popular software. This compatibility was crucial for users looking to incorporate the interface into their existing setups. 26% of users were dissatisfied with DAW integration, facing issues with compatibility or limited functionality with specific software. Some users experienced connection problems or required additional configuration to achieve optimal performance. 74% Noise Levels 87% of users were satisfied with the low noise levels of the M-Audio AIR 192\|4, noting that it provided clean recordings without unwanted interference. This was particularly important for users working on professional audio projects requiring high fidelity. 13% of users were dissatisfied with noise levels, reporting occasional static or hum during recordings. Some users felt that the noise floor was higher than expected, affecting the quality of their audio outputs. 87% Control Layout 83% of users were satisfied with the control layout of the M-Audio AIR 192\|4, praising the intuitive design that made adjusting settings easy and accessible. The layout was seen as user-friendly, allowing quick changes during recording sessions. 17% of users were dissatisfied with the control layout, finding some controls too small or closely placed, leading to difficulty in making precise adjustments. Some users felt that the layout could be improved for better ergonomics. 83% Output Quality 89% of users were satisfied with the output quality of the M-Audio AIR 192\|4, appreciating the clarity and depth of sound it delivered. This high-quality output was essential for both playback and monitoring during production. 11% of users were dissatisfied with the output quality, experiencing inconsistencies or lack of volume control precision. Some users felt that the output did not meet their expectations for certain professional applications. 89% Firmware Updates 72% of users were satisfied with the availability and effectiveness of firmware updates for the M-Audio AIR 192\|4, which helped in resolving bugs and improving performance over time. Regular updates were seen as a positive aspect of the product maintenance. 28% of users were dissatisfied with firmware updates, citing infrequent releases or lack of significant improvements. Some users experienced issues with the update process itself, which sometimes led to temporary malfunctions. 72% Value for Professionals 82% of users, including professional musicians and producers, were satisfied with the M-Audio AIR 192\|4 as a reliable tool for their work. They valued its balance of features and quality, which supported their professional audio needs without requiring a substantial investment. 18% of users felt that the interface did not fully meet the demands of professional work, citing limitations in features or performance compared to higher-end models. Some professionals required more advanced options to match their specific technical requirements. 82% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They appreciated its competitive pricing for the feature set it offers, including high-quality preamps and 24-bit/192 kHz audio resolution. Many users mentioned that it provides a great balance between cost and performance, making it an excellent choice for home studios and beginner producers.

15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to expectations that were not met regarding advanced features available in more expensive interfaces. Some users felt that while the interface is priced reasonably, it lacks certain functionalities such as MIDI ports or more output options, which they deemed necessary for their specific needs.

85%
Quality of Materials

78% of users were pleased with the quality of materials used in the PreSonus Studio 24c. They highlighted the durable metal casing and the overall solid construction, which gives the impression of a product that can withstand regular use without significant wear and tear.

22% of users were not satisfied with the quality of materials. Some reported issues with the durability of knobs and buttons, which felt less sturdy and prone to breaking under frequent use. This led to concerns over the longevity of the interface's components.

78%
Sound Quality

90% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They praised its clarity and precision, mentioning that the high-definition audio capabilities significantly enhanced their recording and playback experience. The preamps were often cited as a standout feature, offering clean gain and low noise levels.

10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, noting occasional issues with noise interference and less than optimal performance at higher gain settings. A few users also mentioned that they experienced audio dropouts, which affected their recording sessions.

90%
Ease of Use

87% of users found the PreSonus Studio 24c easy to use, particularly appreciating its plug-and-play functionality and intuitive controls. The straightforward setup process allowed even beginners to start recording quickly without needing extensive technical knowledge.

13% of users found the interface less user-friendly than expected. Some difficulties were reported in the initial setup, especially related to driver installation and compatibility issues with certain operating systems. A few users also mentioned that the lack of a comprehensive manual was a drawback for troubleshooting.

87%
Portability

82% of users were satisfied with the portability of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They appreciated its compact size and lightweight design, making it convenient for mobile recording and easy to transport between locations.

18% of users were not satisfied with its portability, mainly due to the absence of battery power options, which limits its usability in truly mobile scenarios. Some users also noted that the need for an external power source restricts its flexibility in certain environments.

82%
Compatibility

84% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the PreSonus Studio 24c across different operating systems and DAWs. Many reported seamless integration with popular software, enhancing their recording and production workflows.

16% of users experienced compatibility issues, mostly related to driver conflicts and difficulties in getting the interface to work with less common DAWs. Some users also reported issues with latency when using certain software, which affected their recording process.

84%
Customer Support

75% of users were happy with the customer support provided by PreSonus. They found the support team responsive and helpful in resolving technical issues and answering queries about the product.

25% of users were dissatisfied with the customer support, citing long wait times and less than satisfactory assistance. Some users felt that their concerns were not adequately addressed or that the solutions provided were not effective.

75%
Durability

80% of users were satisfied with the durability of the PreSonus Studio 24c, noting that the robust construction and quality materials give it a long lifespan, even with frequent use.

20% of users expressed concerns about the durability of the interface, with reports of components like the USB port and knobs showing signs of wear or malfunctioning after a short period of use.

80%
Design

88% of users appreciated the design of the PreSonus Studio 24c, noting its sleek, modern look and intuitive layout that enhances user experience. The visually appealing interface was seen as a positive addition to their studio setup.

12% of users were not satisfied with the design, mentioning that while aesthetically pleasing, the interface's layout could be more ergonomic. Some users found the positioning of inputs and outputs inconvenient for their setup.

88%
Latency

86% of users reported satisfaction with the low latency performance of the PreSonus Studio 24c. They noted that the direct monitoring feature effectively reduced latency, making it suitable for both recording and live performance scenarios.

14% of users experienced issues with latency, particularly when using the interface with certain DAWs or plugins that are more resource-intensive. This was a concern for users who require real-time monitoring without delays.

86%
Input/Output Options

77% of users were content with the input/output options available on the PreSonus Studio 24c, finding the combination of XLR and line inputs adequate for most basic recording needs.

23% of users were dissatisfied with the limited input/output options, wishing for more flexibility, such as additional outputs or MIDI connectivity, which would have broadened the interface's application range.

77%
Software Bundled

82% of users were satisfied with the software bundled with the PreSonus Studio 24c, particularly appreciating the inclusion of Studio One Artist DAW, which provided a comprehensive suite of recording tools.

18% of users found the bundled software lacking or difficult to use. Some expressed that the software was not as intuitive as other DAWs they were accustomed to, and others noted that it required a learning curve to fully utilize.

82%
Preamp Quality

88% of users praised the preamp quality in the PreSonus Studio 24c, noting that the XMAX-L preamps deliver excellent sound clarity and headroom, enhancing the overall audio quality of their recordings.

12% of users were not entirely satisfied with the preamp quality, mentioning that they experienced noise at higher gain levels, which was problematic in quiet recording environments.

88%
Build Quality

83% of users were satisfied with the build quality, appreciating the sturdy metal chassis and solid construction that make the PreSonus Studio 24c feel like a premium product.

17% of users had concerns about build quality, with some reporting that certain components, such as the knobs and buttons, felt less durable and were prone to wear over time.

83%
Driver Stability

79% of users were satisfied with the driver stability, mentioning that once installed, the interface operated smoothly without frequent crashes or disconnections, ensuring reliable performance.

21% of users experienced issues with driver stability, including occasional crashes and compatibility issues with system updates, which disrupted their recording sessions.

79%
Value for Beginners

91% of users, especially beginners, found the PreSonus Studio 24c to be of great value, citing its ease of use and comprehensive feature set as ideal for those starting in audio production.

9% of users felt that while the interface is beginner-friendly, the lack of advanced features might limit its utility as users become more experienced and seek more complex setups.

91%
USB Type-C Connectivity

85% of users appreciated the USB Type-C connectivity, noting faster data transfer speeds and reliable connectivity, which enhanced their overall user experience.

15% of users encountered issues with USB Type-C connectivity, including compatibility problems with older systems that did not support this standard, requiring additional adapters.

85%
Software Updates

76% of users were satisfied with the frequency and quality of software updates provided by PreSonus, which addressed bugs and added new features, improving the interface's functionality over time.

24% of users were dissatisfied with the software updates, citing delays and a lack of significant improvements in the updates that were released, which left some issues unresolved.

76%
Aesthetic Appeal

89% of users were impressed with the aesthetic appeal of the PreSonus Studio 24c, highlighting its modern design and sleek finish, which made it a visually attractive addition to their studio setup.

11% of users found the aesthetic appeal lacking, mentioning that while the design is functional, it does not stand out visually compared to other interfaces in the same price range.

89%
Overall Satisfaction

87% of users reported overall satisfaction with the PreSonus Studio 24c, praising its combination of performance, features, and price point. Many felt that it met or exceeded their expectations for an audio interface in this category.

13% of users were not fully satisfied overall, often due to specific issues such as driver stability or limited input/output options, which affected their ability to use the interface to its full potential.

87%

Purchase Value

85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the M-Audio AIR 192|4 Audio Interface. They appreciated the combination of affordability and features, noting that it offers excellent value for money compared to other interfaces in the same price range. Users highlighted the high-quality sound output and the inclusion of necessary inputs and outputs as key factors in their satisfaction.

15% of users were dissatisfied with the purchase value, primarily due to occasional sales and promotions that made them feel they overpaid at the time of purchase. Some also mentioned that they expected more advanced features based on the price.

85%
Quality of Materials

78% of users found the quality of materials used in the M-Audio AIR 192|4 to be satisfactory. They appreciated the sturdy build and premium feel of the device, which contributed to their confidence in its durability. Many users felt that the materials used were appropriate for a product in this price range, providing a good balance between cost and quality.

22% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of materials, citing concerns about the plastic components feeling less sturdy. Some reported issues with knobs and connectors becoming loose over time, which affected their overall perception of the product's durability.

78%
Sound Quality

90% of users praised the sound quality of the M-Audio AIR 192|4, noting clear and crisp audio output, which enhanced their recording and playback experiences. Users particularly appreciated the low noise floor and the high fidelity of the sound, which they felt was comparable to more expensive models.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the sound quality, mentioning that they experienced occasional static or interference. Some users felt that the interface did not perform well with certain types of microphones or instruments, which affected their overall experience.

90%
Ease of Use

82% of users were satisfied with the ease of use of the M-Audio AIR 192|4, highlighting its straightforward setup process and intuitive interface. Many appreciated the simplicity of the controls, which allowed them to quickly start recording without a steep learning curve.

18% of users found the interface less user-friendly, particularly citing issues with the initial setup and driver installation. Some users experienced difficulties in configuring the device with their preferred software, which led to frustration.

82%
Software Compatibility

75% of users were pleased with the software compatibility of the M-Audio AIR 192|4, noting that it worked seamlessly with popular DAWs and recording software. Many users appreciated the bundled software, which added value to their purchase.

25% of users were dissatisfied with software compatibility, reporting challenges in configuring the interface with specific DAWs or experiencing limited functionality with older software versions. Some users faced latency issues that hindered their recording process.

75%
Design

88% of users were satisfied with the design of the M-Audio AIR 192|4, commending its sleek and modern look. The compact size and layout of controls were appreciated for their convenience, making the interface easy to integrate into various setups.

12% of users were dissatisfied with the design, mainly due to the placement of certain controls which they found inconvenient. Some users felt that the interface was too compact, leading to potential issues when connecting multiple devices.

88%
Portability

80% of users were satisfied with the portability of the M-Audio AIR 192|4, appreciating its lightweight and compact design. This made it easy for them to transport the interface for mobile recordings or to different studio locations.

20% of users were dissatisfied with portability, noting that the lack of a protective case or bag made it susceptible to damage during transport. Some users felt that additional features, such as battery power, would enhance its portability.

80%
Durability

77% of users were happy with the durability of the M-Audio AIR 192|4, stating that it withstood regular use without showing significant wear and tear. They felt confident in its ability to last over time given its solid construction.

23% of users were dissatisfied with durability, citing issues with components such as knobs and connectors becoming loose or malfunctioning after prolonged use. Some users expected a more robust build quality for extended durability.

77%
Customer Support

70% of users were satisfied with the customer support offered by M-Audio, appreciating the prompt responses and helpful assistance they received when encountering issues with the AIR 192|4. Many users felt that the support team was knowledgeable and provided effective solutions.

30% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, mentioning delays in response times or difficulty in obtaining satisfactory resolutions to their problems. Some users felt that the support staff lacked technical expertise, leading to unresolved issues.

70%
Driver Stability

73% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the M-Audio AIR 192|4, reporting smooth operation and minimal issues with crashes or disconnects. Many users appreciated the regular updates that helped maintain compatibility with various operating systems.

27% of users were dissatisfied with driver stability, experiencing frequent crashes or disconnects during use. Some users reported issues with installing or updating drivers, which affected their ability to use the interface effectively.

73%
Latency

81% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the M-Audio AIR 192|4, noting that it allowed for seamless real-time monitoring and recording. This feature was particularly appreciated by musicians and producers who required precise timing.

19% of users were dissatisfied with latency, experiencing delays that affected their recording sessions. Some users found that latency increased with certain software or when using higher sample rates, which impacted their workflow.

81%
Input/Output Options

84% of users were satisfied with the input and output options provided by the M-Audio AIR 192|4, appreciating the versatility and ability to connect various audio equipment. The interface's combination of XLR and instrument inputs was particularly valued.

16% of users were dissatisfied with the input/output options, feeling limited by the number of available connections. Some users wished for additional outputs for more complex setups or found the existing options insufficient for their needs.

84%
Bundled Software

76% of users were pleased with the bundled software that came with the M-Audio AIR 192|4, finding it useful for getting started with recording and production. Users appreciated the added value and variety of tools included in the package.

24% of users were dissatisfied with the bundled software, expressing that it was either too basic or not compatible with their preferred workflow. Some users experienced issues with software installation or activation, which hindered their experience.

76%
Aesthetics

86% of users were satisfied with the aesthetics of the M-Audio AIR 192|4, complimenting its sleek design and professional appearance. The modern look was appreciated by those who valued both functionality and style in their audio equipment.

14% of users were dissatisfied with the aesthetics, feeling that the design was too minimalistic or not aligned with their personal taste. Some users preferred a more traditional look for their recording equipment.

86%
Setup Process

79% of users were satisfied with the setup process of the M-Audio AIR 192|4, finding it straightforward and easy to follow. The clear instructions and quick installation allowed users to begin using the interface with minimal hassle.

21% of users were dissatisfied with the setup process, encountering complications during driver installation or setup with their DAW. Some users found the instructions unclear or lacking in detail, leading to a frustrating experience.

79%
Integration with DAWs

74% of users were satisfied with the integration of the M-Audio AIR 192|4 with various DAWs, noting seamless connection and functionality with popular software. This compatibility was crucial for users looking to incorporate the interface into their existing setups.

26% of users were dissatisfied with DAW integration, facing issues with compatibility or limited functionality with specific software. Some users experienced connection problems or required additional configuration to achieve optimal performance.

74%
Noise Levels

87% of users were satisfied with the low noise levels of the M-Audio AIR 192|4, noting that it provided clean recordings without unwanted interference. This was particularly important for users working on professional audio projects requiring high fidelity.

13% of users were dissatisfied with noise levels, reporting occasional static or hum during recordings. Some users felt that the noise floor was higher than expected, affecting the quality of their audio outputs.

87%
Control Layout

83% of users were satisfied with the control layout of the M-Audio AIR 192|4, praising the intuitive design that made adjusting settings easy and accessible. The layout was seen as user-friendly, allowing quick changes during recording sessions.

17% of users were dissatisfied with the control layout, finding some controls too small or closely placed, leading to difficulty in making precise adjustments. Some users felt that the layout could be improved for better ergonomics.

83%
Output Quality

89% of users were satisfied with the output quality of the M-Audio AIR 192|4, appreciating the clarity and depth of sound it delivered. This high-quality output was essential for both playback and monitoring during production.

11% of users were dissatisfied with the output quality, experiencing inconsistencies or lack of volume control precision. Some users felt that the output did not meet their expectations for certain professional applications.

89%
Firmware Updates

72% of users were satisfied with the availability and effectiveness of firmware updates for the M-Audio AIR 192|4, which helped in resolving bugs and improving performance over time. Regular updates were seen as a positive aspect of the product maintenance.

28% of users were dissatisfied with firmware updates, citing infrequent releases or lack of significant improvements. Some users experienced issues with the update process itself, which sometimes led to temporary malfunctions.

72%
Value for Professionals

82% of users, including professional musicians and producers, were satisfied with the M-Audio AIR 192|4 as a reliable tool for their work. They valued its balance of features and quality, which supported their professional audio needs without requiring a substantial investment.

18% of users felt that the interface did not fully meet the demands of professional work, citing limitations in features or performance compared to higher-end models. Some professionals required more advanced options to match their specific technical requirements.

82%

Pros:
High-resolution 24-bit/192 kHz audio quality. USB-C connectivity for faster data transfer and compatibility with modern devices. Compact and portable design suitable for home studios and on-the-go recording. Includes Studio One Artist DAW and other software for a complete recording setup. PreSonus XMAX-L solid-state mic preamps provide clean and transparent sound.	High-quality 24-bit/192kHz audio resolution. User-friendly interface with large central volume knob. Includes software bundle with Ableton Live Lite and more. Direct monitoring feature with no latency. Compact and portable design.

Cons:
Limited to 2 input and 2 output channels, which may not be enough for larger projects. No built-in DSP effects or processing. Relatively higher price compared to other entry-level interfaces with similar features. Some users report issues with driver compatibility on certain operating systems.	Limited to 2 inputs and 2 outputs. No MIDI input/output. Build quality can feel less robust compared to higher-end models. USB Type-C connection may require adapters for some users. Only one headphone output.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	1 Preamp
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line/Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Host Connection
1x USB-C (Class-Compliant)	1x USB-C (Class-Compliant)
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.13 or Later (64-Bit Only) Windows 10 or Later (64-Bit Only)	macOS 10.8 or Later Windows 7 or Later
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

Both the PreSonus Studio 24c and the M-Audio AIR 192|4 are 2x2 USB Type-C audio interfaces designed for desktop use. They offer similar functionality but have distinct differences in their specifications and features.
Starting with the PreSonus Studio 24c, this interface supports a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit resolution. It includes two microphone preamps, allowing for two simultaneous mic inputs via its combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced inputs. In addition to these inputs, it features two 1/4" TRS balanced line/monitor outputs and a 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output. The device is class-compliant and connects via a single USB-C port. It is compatible with macOS 10.13 or later (64-bit only) and Windows 10 or later (64-bit only). The interface is powered via USB bus, eliminating the need for an external power source.
On the other hand, the M-Audio AIR 192|4 also supports a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit resolution but includes only one microphone preamp. It offers a single combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line input along with a separate 1/4" TS unbalanced Hi-Z input on the front panel, catering to instrument inputs such as electric guitars. The analog audio outputs include two 1/4" TRS balanced line outputs and a 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output, also located on the front panel. Similar to the PreSonus model, the M-Audio AIR 192|4 connects via USB-C and is class-compliant. It is compatible with macOS 10.8 or later and Windows 7 or later. This interface is also USB bus-powered.
In summary, while both interfaces share the same maximum sampling rate and bit depth, the PreSonus Studio 24c offers more flexibility with two microphone inputs compared to the single mic input of the M-Audio AIR 192|4. However, the M-Audio AIR 192|4 provides a dedicated Hi-Z input that might be more convenient for certain users, especially those who frequently record electric instruments. Compatibility wise, the PreSonus model requires more recent operating systems, whereas the M-Audio device supports older versions. Both are powered via USB, simplifying their use by eliminating the need for external power supplies.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	1 Preamp
Input Level Adjustment
2x Knob	2x Knob
Expansion Slots

When comparing the PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the M-Audio AIR 192|4 Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio Interface, several key features stand out.
Both interfaces offer 2x2 analog channels of input and output at a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz with a 24-bit resolution, ensuring high-quality audio recording and playback. This high sampling rate and bit depth are consistent across both devices, making them suitable for professional audio production.
However, a significant difference lies in the number of microphone inputs. The PreSonus Studio 24c provides 2 preamp microphone inputs, which can be advantageous for users who need to record multiple sources simultaneously, such as in a vocal and instrument setup. In contrast, the M-Audio AIR 192|4 offers only 1 preamp microphone input, which might limit recording capabilities for users who require more than one microphone input at the same time.
Both interfaces feature 2x knob input level adjustments, allowing users to easily control the input levels for optimal recording quality. This feature ensures that both interfaces provide straightforward and intuitive control over audio inputs.
In terms of expansion slots, both the PreSonus Studio 24c and the M-Audio AIR 192|4 do not offer any, indicating that neither device supports additional modules or cards for expanding their capabilities.
In summary, both the PreSonus Studio 24c and M-Audio AIR 192|4 offer high-resolution audio capabilities with similar basic features. However, the PreSonus Studio 24c stands out with its two microphone preamp inputs compared to the single preamp input of the M-Audio AIR 192|4, potentially making it a more versatile choice for users needing to record multiple microphones simultaneously.

Signal Processing
Pad

Gain/Trim Range
Inputs: 50 dB	Mic/Line Inputs: 55 dB Hi-Z Inputs: 24 dB
High-Pass Filter

Solo/Mute

The PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the M-Audio AIR 192|4 Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio Interface share several features, but also have some key differences.
Both the PreSonus Studio 24c and the M-Audio AIR 192|4 do not include a pad, high-pass filter, or solo/mute functionality, making them similar in terms of these specific features. However, when it comes to gain/trim range, there is a noticeable difference. The PreSonus Studio 24c offers a gain/trim range of 50 dB for its inputs, which is slightly lower than the M-Audio AIR 192|4. The M-Audio AIR 192|4 provides a gain/trim range of 55 dB for its mic/line inputs and 24 dB for its Hi-Z inputs.
This difference in gain/trim range means the M-Audio AIR 192|4 may offer more flexibility and control, particularly with microphone and line-level inputs, compared to the PreSonus Studio 24c. This could be a deciding factor for users who require a broader range of gain adjustments.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line/Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Phantom Power
48 V, Selectable On/Off (Applied to All Inputs)	48 V, Selectable On/Off
Digital Audio I/O

Host Connection
1x USB-C (Class-Compliant)	1x USB-C (Class-Compliant)
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0	USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)

Sync I/O

Network I/O

MIDI I/O
1x DIN 5-Pin Input 1x DIN 5-Pin Output

The PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the M-Audio AIR 192|4 Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio Interface are both high-quality audio interfaces designed for professional and home studio recording, but they differ in several key features.
Starting with analog audio I/O, the PreSonus Studio 24c offers 2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs, which allow for versatile connectivity options for microphones, instruments, and line-level devices. It also provides 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line/Monitor Outputs and 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output. On the other hand, the M-Audio AIR 192|4 has a slightly different configuration with 1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input and 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) for instruments. It also includes 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Outputs and 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel).
Both interfaces offer 48 V selectable phantom power for condenser microphones, but the PreSonus Studio 24c specifies a phantom power current of 10 mA, a detail not provided by the M-Audio AIR 192|4. Neither unit features digital audio I/O, sync I/O, or network I/O.
For host connection, both interfaces use a USB-C connection that is class-compliant and operates on USB 2.0 protocol, ensuring compatibility with modern computers. Neither device includes additional USB (Non-Host) ports.
A significant differentiator is the MIDI I/O capability. The PreSonus Studio 24c includes 1x DIN 5-Pin Input and 1x DIN 5-Pin Output for MIDI devices, making it suitable for users who need to integrate MIDI equipment into their setup. In contrast, the M-Audio AIR 192|4 does not offer MIDI I/O, which might be a limitation for users looking to connect MIDI instruments or controllers directly to their audio interface.
In summary, the PreSonus Studio 24c offers more comprehensive connectivity options, especially with its dual combo inputs and MIDI I/O, making it a versatile choice for various recording setups. The M-Audio AIR 192|4, while also offering high-quality audio performance, provides a simpler input configuration and lacks MIDI connectivity, which may be a consideration for users depending on their specific needs.

Performance
Frequency Response
Mic Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.3 dB (Unity Gain) Hi-Z Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.1 dB (Unity Gain) Monitor Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.3 dB (Unity Gain) Headphone Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.5 dB (Unity Gain)	Mic Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz +0.1 dB Line, Hi-Z Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.05 dB Monitor Outputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz +0.06 dB
Maximum Input Level
Mic Inputs: +10 dBu (Min Gain) Hi-Z Inputs: +19 dBu (Min Gain)	Mic Inputs: +1.5 dBu Line Inputs: +16 dBu Hi-Z Inputs: +6 dBu
Maximum Output Level
Monitor Outputs: +10 dBu (Balanced)	Line Outputs: +7 dBu (Balanced, 1 kHz)
Impedance
Mic Inputs: 1.4 Kilohms Hi-Z Inputs: 750 Kilohms Headphone Outputs: 32 to 300 Ohms	Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohm (Unbalanced) Headphone Outputs: 10 Ohms (Balanced)
Dynamic Range
AD/DA Converters: 108 dB Mic Inputs: 106 dBA Hi-Z Inputs: 105 dBA Monitor Outputs: 104 dB (Unweighted) Headphone Outputs: 83 dBA	Mic Inputs: 104 dB (A-Weighted) Hi-Z Inputs: 100 dB (A-Weighted) Monitor Outputs: 102 dB (A-Weighted)
THD+N
Mic Inputs: 0.004% (1 kHz, Min Gain, at -1 dBFS) Hi-Z Inputs: 0.002% (1 kHz, Min Gain) Monitor Outputs: 0.001% (1 kHz, Unity Gain, at -1 dBFS) Headphone Outputs: 0.01% (1 kHz, at 0 dBFS)	Mic/Line Inputs: 0.003% Hi-Z Inputs: 0.004% Headphone/Monitor Outputs: 0.005%
EIN
Mic Inputs: -126 dBu A-Weighted	Mic Inputs: -128 dBu A-Weighted (150-Ohm Source, Max Gain)

The PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the M-Audio AIR 192|4 Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio Interface are both robust options for audio recording, each with its own strengths in different specifications.
Starting with frequency response, the PreSonus Studio 24c offers mic inputs with a response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.3 dB, Hi-Z inputs at 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.1 dB, monitor outputs at 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.3 dB, and headphone outputs at 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.5 dB. In comparison, the M-Audio AIR 192|4 provides a slightly tighter frequency response for mic inputs at 20 Hz to 20 kHz +0.1 dB, line/Hi-Z inputs at 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.05 dB, and monitor outputs at 20 Hz to 20 kHz +0.06 dB.
In terms of maximum input level, the PreSonus Studio 24c handles mic inputs up to +10 dBu, Hi-Z inputs up to +19 dBu, while the M-Audio AIR 192|4 handles mic inputs up to +1.5 dBu, line inputs up to +16 dBu, and Hi-Z inputs up to +6 dBu.
For maximum output level, the PreSonus Studio 24c offers +10 dBu for monitor outputs and 47 mW per channel into 56 Ohms for headphone output power. The M-Audio AIR 192|4 has a maximum line output level of +7 dBu (balanced, 1 kHz).
Regarding impedance, the PreSonus Studio 24c features mic inputs at 1.4 Kilohms, Hi-Z inputs at 750 Kilohms, and headphone outputs supporting 32 to 300 Ohms. The M-Audio AIR 192|4 presents Hi-Z inputs at 1 Megohm (unbalanced) and headphone outputs at 10 Ohms (balanced).
Dynamic range comparisons show the PreSonus Studio 24c with AD/DA converters at 108 dB and mic inputs at 106 dBA, Hi-Z inputs at 105 dBA, monitor outputs at 104 dB (unweighted), and headphone outputs at 83 dBA. The M-Audio AIR 192|4 offers mic inputs at 104 dB (A-weighted), Hi-Z inputs at 100 dB (A-weighted), and monitor outputs at 102 dB (A-weighted).
Examining THD+N (Total Harmonic Distortion plus Noise), the PreSonus Studio 24c records mic inputs at 0.004% (1 kHz, min gain, at -1 dBFS), Hi-Z inputs at 0.002% (1 kHz, min gain), monitor outputs at 0.001% (1 kHz, unity gain, at -1 dBFS), and headphone outputs at 0.01% (1 kHz, at 0 dBFS). The M-Audio AIR 192|4 lists mic/line inputs at 0.003%, Hi-Z inputs at 0.004%, and headphone/monitor outputs at 0.005%.
Finally, for Equivalent Input Noise (EIN), the PreSonus Studio 24c specifies mic inputs at -126 dBu A-weighted, while the M-Audio AIR 192|4 lists mic inputs at -128 dBu A-weighted (150-Ohm source, max gain).
Overall, both interfaces offer high-quality performance, but the PreSonus Studio 24c shows slightly better specifications in dynamic range and THD+N, while the M-Audio AIR 192|4 presents a tighter frequency response and lower EIN.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
Up to 192 kHz (AD/DA Conversion)	Up to 192 kHz (AD/DA Conversion)
Sample Rate Conversion

Bit Depths
Up to 24-Bit (AD/DA Conversion)	24-Bit (AD/DA Conversion)
Sync Sources
Internal	Internal

The PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the M-Audio AIR 192|4 Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio Interface share several key specifications but also have distinct differences that might influence a user's decision based on specific needs.
Both interfaces support sample rates of up to 192 kHz for Analog-to-Digital (AD) and Digital-to-Analog (DA) conversion, ensuring high-resolution audio recording and playback capabilities. Similarly, both devices offer a bit depth of up to 24-bit for AD/DA conversion, which is standard for professional audio interfaces and provides a wide dynamic range and low noise floor.
However, the M-Audio AIR 192|4 includes a specification for latency, reporting a latency of 2.59 ms. This latency can vary depending on the buffer size and other factors, but the inclusion of this detail can be crucial for users who require real-time audio processing with minimal delay. The PreSonus Studio 24c does not specify its latency, which might make it less appealing to those who prioritize low-latency performance for tasks such as live monitoring or real-time effects processing.
Both interfaces use internal sync sources, which means they rely on their internal clocks to maintain timing accuracy. This is typical for small desktop audio interfaces and is suitable for most home studio applications.
In summary, while both the PreSonus Studio 24c and the M-Audio AIR 192|4 offer high sample rates and bit depths, the M-Audio AIR 192|4 provides additional information about its low-latency performance, which could be a decisive factor for users needing real-time audio processing capabilities.

Audio Storage & Playback
Memory Card Slot

When comparing the PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the M-Audio AIR 192|4 Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio Interface, both products share a number of similarities and differences across various features.
The PreSonus Studio 24c is a 2x2 audio/MIDI interface that connects via USB Type-C. It is designed for high-definition recording and offers professional-grade 24-bit/192 kHz audio quality. It features two front-panel combo mic/instrument/line inputs with XMAX-L solid-state mic preamps, and two balanced TRS outputs. The interface includes a MIDI I/O for connecting external MIDI gear such as keyboards and controllers. It also features a mix control for blending the input signal with the computer playback, which is useful for zero-latency monitoring. Additionally, it has an LED metering on the front panel for monitoring input and output levels. One notable aspect is that it does not include a memory card slot, which means users must rely on their connected computer or external storage solutions for data management.
The M-Audio AIR 192|4 is also a 2x2 audio interface that connects via USB Type-C. It supports high-resolution 24-bit/192 kHz audio and features a rugged metal chassis for durability. The interface includes two front-panel combo inputs with Crystal preamps and pristine A/D converters, which ensure clear and transparent audio capture. It also offers two balanced outputs and a quarter-inch headphone output with independent level control. The M-Audio AIR 192|4 features a USB/Direct knob for zero-latency monitoring, allowing users to blend the input signal with the playback from their computer. Just like the PreSonus Studio 24c, the M-Audio AIR 192|4 lacks a memory card slot, indicating that data storage must be managed through external means.
Both interfaces provide similar core functionalities with high-quality audio recording and playback, zero-latency monitoring, and durable design. They both connect via USB Type-C and offer 24-bit/192 kHz audio resolution. However, the PreSonus Studio 24c additionally includes MIDI I/O, making it a potentially better option for users who need to integrate MIDI equipment into their setup. On the other hand, the M-Audio AIR 192|4 focuses on offering a sturdy build and easy-to-use design without the need for MIDI integration. Both lack memory card slots, so users will need to manage storage separately.

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.13 or Later (64-Bit Only) Windows 10 or Later (64-Bit Only)	macOS 10.8 or Later Windows 7 or Later
Mobile Device Compatibility

Required Hardware
USB Cable (Included) Available USB 2.0 Port or USB-C Port	Available USB 2.0 Port or USB-C Port USB Cable (Included)
Internet Connection
Required for Registration, Software/Driver Download	Required for Registration, Software/Driver Download

When comparing the PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface to the M-Audio AIR 192|4 Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio Interface, several key specifications stand out.
The PreSonus Studio 24c is compatible with macOS 10.13 or later (64-bit only) and Windows 10 or later (64-bit only). It requires at least an Intel Core i3 processor for both Mac and PC, with a recommendation of 4 GB RAM, though 8 GB is preferred. Storage requirements are 30 GB, and the minimum display resolution is 1366 x 768. The interface is not compatible with mobile devices and necessitates a USB cable (which is included) and an available USB 2.0 or USB-C port. An internet connection is required for registration and software/driver downloads.
In contrast, the M-Audio AIR 192|4 offers broader OS compatibility, supporting macOS 10.8 or later and Windows 7 or later. Like the PreSonus model, it does not support mobile device compatibility. The necessary hardware includes an available USB 2.0 or USB-C port, and a USB cable is included with the device. Similar to the PreSonus, an internet connection is essential for registration and software/driver downloads.
Both interfaces require a similar hardware setup, including a USB port and internet connection for essential updates and registrations. The PreSonus demands more recent operating systems and has higher minimum system requirements in terms of processor, RAM, and storage, which may provide an edge in performance but could limit compatibility with older systems. The M-Audio AIR 192|4 offers wider OS compatibility, potentially making it more versatile for users with older operating systems.

Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

Both the PreSonus Studio 24c and the M-Audio AIR 192|4 are desktop 2x2 USB Type-C audio interfaces, and they share the same power requirement specification, which is USB bus power. This means that both interfaces draw power directly from the connected USB port without the need for an external power supply, ensuring a more streamlined and clutter-free setup.
The PreSonus Studio 24c and M-Audio AIR 192|4 are designed with portability and convenience in mind. Their reliance on USB bus power makes them ideal for mobile recording setups or home studios where minimizing extra cables and power adapters is crucial. This feature also simplifies the process of connecting the interface to a computer, as users only need a single USB Type-C cable for both data transfer and power.
In summary, both the PreSonus Studio 24c and the M-Audio AIR 192|4 offer the convenience of USB bus power, making them efficient and easy to integrate into various recording environments without the need for additional power sources. This shared feature underscores their suitability for users seeking a straightforward and portable audio interface solution.

Physical
Anti-Theft Features
Kensington Security Slot	Kensington Security Slot
Dimensions
7 x 5.5 x 1.75" / 17.8 x 14 x 4.45 cm	8 x 6 x 2.76" / 20.3 x 15.2 x 7.01 cm
Weight
2.0 lb / 0.9 kg	2.0 lb / 0.9 kg

The PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the M-Audio AIR 192|4 Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio Interface share some common features and specifications but also differ in certain aspects.
Both interfaces are equipped with anti-theft features, specifically the Kensington Security Slot, which is a standard feature for securing devices in public or shared spaces. This ensures that both devices can be securely locked, providing peace of mind to their users.
In terms of physical dimensions, the PreSonus Studio 24c measures 7 x 5.5 x 1.75 inches (17.8 x 14 x 4.45 cm), making it slightly more compact compared to the M-Audio AIR 192|4, which measures 8 x 6 x 2.76 inches (20.3 x 15.2 x 7.01 cm). The smaller footprint of the PreSonus Studio 24c might be more appealing to users with limited desk space or those who prefer a more portable option.
Despite the difference in size, both interfaces weigh the same, with each unit coming in at 2.0 lb (0.9 kg). This weight makes both devices relatively lightweight and easy to transport, ensuring that neither adds significant bulk to a portable recording setup.
In summary, while the PreSonus Studio 24c is more compact, both it and the M-Audio AIR 192|4 offer similar anti-theft features and weight, making them both viable options for users looking for a reliable and portable audio interface.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
2.285 lb	2.85 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
7.8 x 7.5 x 2"	11 x 7.5 x 4.8"

The PreSonus Studio 24c Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio/MIDI Interface and the M-Audio AIR 192|4 Desktop 2x2 USB Type-C Audio Interface both offer robust features for audio recording and production, but they differ in some key specifications.
The PreSonus Studio 24c has a package weight of 2.285 lb and its box dimensions are 7.8 x 7.5 x 2 inches. This relatively compact and lightweight design makes it a portable choice for musicians and producers who need to record on the go. The interface offers a range of connectivity options, including MIDI, which adds flexibility for integrating various musical instruments and equipment.
On the other hand, the M-Audio AIR 192|4 has a slightly heavier package weight of 2.85 lb and larger box dimensions of 11 x 7.5 x 4.8 inches. While it is bulkier compared to the PreSonus Studio 24c, the M-Audio AIR 192|4 is known for its high-quality audio performance, offering low-latency monitoring and high-resolution audio recording. The extra weight and size may cater to users looking for a more stationary setup with potentially more robust build quality.
Both interfaces use USB Type-C connectors, ensuring fast and reliable data transfer, which is crucial for high-quality audio recording. However, the choice between these two may come down to the user's need for MIDI connectivity, portability, and the specific audio quality requirements.