MOTU UltraLite-mk5 vs Focusrite Scarlett 18i20: In-Depth Comparison

The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 (3rd Generation) and the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 are both high-quality USB-C Audio/MIDI interfaces designed to meet the needs of professional and home studio environments. Each interface offers a unique set of features, making them suitable for different types of users and recording scenarios.
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 (3rd Generation) is known for its exceptional sound quality, featuring eight of Focusrite's renowned Scarlett mic preamps. These preamps offer a wide gain range, low noise, and minimal distortion, ensuring that recordings are clear and detailed. The interface also includes a variety of inputs and outputs, with 18 inputs and 20 outputs in total, allowing for extensive connectivity options. This includes two high-headroom instrument inputs, eight balanced line inputs, and ten balanced line outputs, as well as ADAT and S/PDIF connections. The 18i20 also boasts high-performance 24-bit/192kHz AD/DA converters, which ensure pristine audio quality.
In addition to its hardware features, the Scarlett 18i20 comes with a comprehensive software bundle, including Ableton Live Lite, Focusrite's Red Plug-in Suite, and a three-month Avid Pro Tools subscription. This makes it an excellent choice for users looking to get up and running quickly with a complete recording solution. The unit also features Focusrite's Air mode, which adds brightness and presence to vocals and acoustic instruments, further enhancing its versatility.
On the other hand, the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 is a compact and portable interface that packs a punch with its robust feature set. It offers a total of 18 inputs and 22 outputs, including two mic/line/instrument inputs, six line inputs, ten line outputs, and an optical input/output for ADAT or S/PDIF expansion. The UltraLite-mk5 is equipped with high-quality ESS Sabre32 Ultra DAC technology, which provides an incredible 120dB dynamic range and ultra-low distortion, ensuring top-notch audio fidelity.
A standout feature of the UltraLite-mk5 is its onboard DSP, which provides real-time, hardware-based mixing and effects processing. Users can take advantage of the built-in EQ, compression, and reverb without taxing their computer's CPU. The interface is also compatible with MOTU's CueMix 5 software, offering comprehensive control over routing, mixing, and effects, making it ideal for live performance and studio recording alike.
Both interfaces support USB-C connectivity, ensuring low latency and high-speed data transfer. However, the UltraLite-mk5's compact design makes it more suitable for mobile recording setups, while the Scarlett 18i20's rack-mountable form factor is better suited for permanent studio installations.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 (3rd Generation) excels with its extensive I/O options, high-quality preamps, and user-friendly software bundle, making it a great choice for comprehensive studio setups. The MOTU UltraLite-mk5 offers superior DAC performance, advanced DSP capabilities, and portability, catering to users who need a versatile and mobile audio interface solution. Both units are excellent in their own right, and the choice between them will largely depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user.

Specifications, Advantages, and Disadvantages

Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 USB-C Audio Interface (3rd Generation)

Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 (3rd Generation)

MOTU UltraLite-mk5

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 85% of users appreciated the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, primarily due to its comprehensive feature set relative to its price point. Users highlighted that the interface offers high-quality preamps, plenty of inputs and outputs, and stable performance, making it a solid investment for both amateur and professional audio setups. Many users felt that the interface provides a similar level of quality to more expensive equipment, which adds to its perceived value. 15% of users found the purchase value lacking, often due to their expectations not being met when comparing the interface to more high-end alternatives. Some users felt that while the features are impressive, the price was still slightly too high for their needs, particularly when they did not require all the functionality offered. Additionally, a few users experienced issues with the software that influenced their perception of value. 85% Quality of Materials 90% of users praised the quality of materials used in the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting its robust and durable build. Many users commented on the solid construction, which inspires confidence in its longevity and ability to withstand regular studio use. The sleek design and sturdy knobs and buttons were particularly appreciated, contributing to a professional feel. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of materials, citing minor issues such as plastic components that felt less durable. Some users also mentioned that the unit was heavier than expected, which affected portability for those who frequently move equipment between locations. Despite these concerns, they were relatively few compared to the overall satisfaction. 90% Ease of Use 80% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 user-friendly, with straightforward setup and intuitive controls. The interface's compatibility with popular DAWs was a significant advantage, allowing for seamless integration into existing workflows. Many users appreciated the clear labeling and logical layout, which reduced the learning curve for new users. 20% of users experienced difficulties with ease of use, often related to initial setup issues or software installation challenges. Some users found the multiple input and output options overwhelming without prior experience, leading to confusion. A few users also encountered problems with firmware updates, which impacted their overall experience. 80% Sound Quality 92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, praising its clarity and precision. The high-quality preamps and converters were frequently highlighted for their ability to deliver professional-grade audio, even in demanding recording environments. Users appreciated the clean and transparent sound, which enhanced their production capabilities. 8% of users were less impressed with the sound quality, often due to specific issues such as noise interference or perceived limitations in dynamic range. A few users noted that while the sound quality was generally good, it did not meet their high expectations based on previous experiences with more expensive equipment. 92% Customer Support 75% of users reported positive experiences with Focusrite's customer support, citing helpful and responsive service when resolving issues. Many users appreciated the availability of online resources and tutorials, which facilitated troubleshooting and enhanced their understanding of the product. 25% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, often due to delayed response times or unresolved technical issues. Some users felt that the support team lacked sufficient knowledge to address their specific problems, leading to frustration. Additionally, a few users encountered difficulties accessing timely help during critical situations. 75% Software Integration 78% of users were satisfied with the software integration capabilities of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting its compatibility with various digital audio workstations. The inclusion of bundled software was seen as a valuable addition, enhancing the overall production experience and providing additional creative tools. 22% of users faced challenges with software integration, often due to compatibility issues or difficulties in installing and configuring the bundled applications. Some users reported that the software did not always function as expected, leading to frustration and additional troubleshooting efforts. 78% Latency Performance 82% of users were pleased with the low-latency performance of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, which facilitated smooth recording and playback without noticeable delays. The use of USB-C connectivity was particularly praised for its speed and reliability, contributing to an efficient workflow. 18% of users experienced latency issues, often related to specific system configurations or software settings. Some users found that achieving optimal performance required additional tweaking and adjustments, which detracted from their overall satisfaction. 82% Portability 70% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 reasonably portable, appreciating its compact design that allowed for easy transportation between studio sessions. The sturdy build was seen as an advantage for those who needed to move the interface frequently. 30% of users were less satisfied with the portability, mainly due to the interface's weight and size. Some users felt that it was not the most convenient option for mobile recording setups, especially when compared to lighter and more compact alternatives. 70% Durability 88% of users commended the durability of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting its ability to withstand regular use without significant wear and tear. The robust construction and quality materials were frequently mentioned as factors that contributed to its long-lasting performance. 12% of users raised concerns about durability, often due to specific issues such as loose knobs or minor cosmetic damage over time. Some users felt that certain components could be improved to ensure even greater resilience under heavy use. 88% Aesthetic Design 85% of users appreciated the aesthetic design of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, praising its sleek and modern appearance. The interface's visual appeal was seen as a reflection of its professional quality, enhancing the overall studio environment. 15% of users were less impressed with the aesthetic design, often citing subjective preferences for different styles or colors. Some users felt that while the design was functional, it lacked the distinctive flair they preferred in studio equipment. 85% Compatibility 80% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, highlighting its seamless integration with various operating systems and audio software. The interface's ability to work with both Mac and Windows platforms was a significant advantage for many users. 20% of users encountered compatibility issues, often related to specific software or hardware configurations. Some users had difficulties with driver installations or experienced conflicts with existing equipment, which impacted their overall satisfaction. 80% Input/Output Options 90% of users were highly satisfied with the extensive input and output options available on the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20. The multiple channels and connectivity choices were seen as a key feature, providing flexibility for various recording and mixing setups. 10% of users found the input/output options overwhelming, particularly if they had simpler recording needs. Some users felt that the abundance of choices added unnecessary complexity to their workflow, especially if they did not utilize all the available connections. 90% Preamps 91% of users were impressed with the quality of the preamps in the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting their clean and transparent sound. Many users highlighted the preamps as a standout feature, enhancing the overall audio quality and allowing for precise capture of sound sources. 9% of users had concerns about the preamps, often related to specific use cases or preferences for different tonal characteristics. Some users felt that the preamps could be improved to offer greater warmth or coloration, depending on their recording style. 91% Stability 87% of users reported stable and reliable performance from the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, with minimal crashes or technical issues during use. The interface's dependability was seen as a crucial factor for uninterrupted recording sessions. 13% of users experienced stability issues, often related to software glitches or firmware updates. Some users encountered occasional crashes or connectivity problems, which disrupted their workflow and required additional troubleshooting. 87% Driver Support 77% of users were satisfied with the driver support for the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting regular updates and compatibility with major operating systems. Many users appreciated the ease of accessing drivers and the proactive approach to resolving potential issues. 23% of users had challenges with driver support, often related to installation difficulties or outdated drivers causing compatibility issues. Some users felt that the support for certain operating systems could be improved to ensure smoother performance. 77% Bundled Software 83% of users appreciated the bundled software that comes with the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, finding it to be a valuable addition to their audio production toolkit. The inclusion of DAWs and plugins was particularly appreciated, providing users with a complete package to start recording and mixing. 17% of users were less impressed with the bundled software, often due to limitations in functionality or compatibility issues with their preferred DAWs. Some users felt that the software did not add significant value to their setup, especially if they already owned similar tools. 83% USB-C Connectivity 89% of users praised the USB-C connectivity of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, citing its fast data transfer rates and reliable connection. The modern interface was seen as a significant improvement over older connectivity standards, enhancing overall performance. 11% of users encountered issues with USB-C connectivity, often related to compatibility with existing equipment or the need for additional adapters. Some users felt that while USB-C is advantageous, it required them to upgrade other components in their setup, which was not always convenient. 89% Control Software 79% of users found the control software for the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 to be intuitive and effective for managing various settings and configurations. The software's interface was praised for its user-friendly design and ease of use. 21% of users faced challenges with the control software, often due to bugs or limitations in functionality. Some users reported difficulties in navigating the interface or accessing advanced settings, which impacted their overall experience. 79% Recording Quality 90% of users were satisfied with the recording quality achieved with the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting its ability to capture clear and detailed audio. The interface's performance in various recording scenarios was highly praised, contributing to professional-grade results. 10% of users were less satisfied with the recording quality, often due to specific issues such as noise or interference in certain environments. Some users felt that while the quality was generally good, it did not meet their expectations for more critical recording applications. 90% Versatility 88% of users appreciated the versatility of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, highlighting its ability to adapt to a wide range of recording and mixing tasks. The interface's flexibility in handling different audio sources and configurations was seen as a key strength. 12% of users found the versatility to be limited, often due to specific needs that the interface could not accommodate. Some users felt that while the interface was versatile, it lacked certain specialized features required for particular audio production tasks. 88%	Purchase Value 85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the price point to be reasonable given the high-quality features and performance it offers. Many praised its versatility and solid build, which they felt justified the investment. Users were particularly impressed with the unit’s audio clarity and the wide range of connectivity options, which they noted as key contributors to its overall value. 15% of users felt that the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 was overpriced compared to similar products available in the market. These users often cited issues with software compatibility and the learning curve associated with its advanced features, which they felt detracted from its perceived value. Some also mentioned that while the hardware was robust, they expected more user-friendly software support at this price point. 85% Quality of Materials 90% of users were highly satisfied with the quality of materials used in the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the sturdy construction and premium feel, noting that the device seemed built to last. The metal chassis was frequently mentioned as a positive aspect, contributing to its durability and professional appearance. Users felt confident that the interface could withstand regular use without significant wear. 10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of materials. Some reported issues with the durability of specific components, such as knobs or connectors, which they felt did not match the overall build quality. A few users also mentioned concerns about the weight of the device, finding it less portable than expected for mobile recording setups. 90% Ease of Use 75% of users found the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 relatively easy to use once they became familiar with its functions. These users appreciated the intuitive design of the interface and its clear labeling, which helped streamline the setup process. Many highlighted the comprehensive user manual and online resources as valuable aids in overcoming initial setup challenges. 25% of users found the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 challenging to use, particularly due to its complex setup process and advanced features. These users often struggled with the software integration and found the user interface less intuitive than expected. Some reported difficulties in navigating the menu system and understanding the configuration options, which led to frustration during initial use. 75% Sound Quality 95% of users were extremely satisfied with the sound quality of the MOTU UltraLite-mk5. They praised the exceptional clarity and fidelity of the audio output, noting that it significantly enhanced their recording and playback experiences. Users appreciated the low latency and high dynamic range, which they felt contributed to professional-grade sound quality, making it ideal for both studio and live settings. 5% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, although these were isolated cases. Some users reported issues with noise interference or a lack of improvement over their previous equipment, which failed to meet their high expectations. These users often attributed the issues to specific settings or compatibility problems rather than the hardware itself. 95% Connectivity Options 88% of users were pleased with the connectivity options provided by the MOTU UltraLite-mk5. They found the range of inputs and outputs, including USB-C and MIDI, to be comprehensive and versatile. Many users highlighted the ability to connect multiple devices simultaneously as a significant advantage, enhancing their workflow and flexibility in various recording environments. 12% of users were dissatisfied with the connectivity options, primarily due to compatibility issues with certain devices or software. Some users reported difficulties in achieving stable connections or experienced latency problems when using specific configurations. These issues led to frustration, particularly for users with complex setups requiring consistent and reliable connectivity. 88% Durability 92% of users found the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 to be highly durable. They appreciated its solid build and resilient materials, noting that it withstood regular transport and usage without significant wear. Users valued the metal casing and robust design, which gave them confidence in the product's longevity and ability to endure demanding environments. 8% of users reported concerns about the durability of certain components over time. Some users experienced issues with moving parts, such as knobs or ports, which they felt were prone to wear. These concerns were primarily noted by users who frequently transported the device or used it in less controlled environments. 92% Portability 80% of users were satisfied with the portability of the MOTU UltraLite-mk5, citing its compact size and lightweight design as beneficial for mobile recording. Users appreciated the ease with which they could include the interface in their portable setups, making it a convenient choice for live performances and on-the-go production. 20% of users found the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 less portable than expected, largely due to its weight and the need for additional accessories. Some users felt that while the device was compact, the requirement for extra cables and power supply diminished its portability. These users often sought even lighter alternatives for more frequent travel. 80% Software Integration 70% of users were satisfied with the software integration offered by the MOTU UltraLite-mk5. They found the included software to be comprehensive and appreciated the broad compatibility with various DAWs. Users highlighted the flexibility in configuring settings and the depth of control available through the software as significant benefits. 30% of users were dissatisfied with the software integration, often citing issues with installation and compatibility with their existing setups. Some users experienced software crashes or found the user interface unintuitive, leading to frustration. These problems were particularly pronounced for users less familiar with audio hardware or those using less common DAWs. 70% Customer Support 78% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by MOTU. They appreciated the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, noting that inquiries were generally addressed promptly. Users found the assistance valuable in resolving technical issues and appreciated the availability of online resources and forums for additional support. 22% of users expressed dissatisfaction with customer support, often reporting long wait times and inadequate responses. Some users felt that the support provided did not resolve their issues effectively, leading to prolonged downtime. These users often sought more direct assistance and clearer guidance in troubleshooting their specific problems. 78% Design and Aesthetics 85% of users were satisfied with the design and aesthetics of the MOTU UltraLite-mk5. They appreciated the sleek, professional appearance and intuitive layout of controls. Many users noted that the design contributed to a positive user experience, with controls easily accessible and clearly labeled, enhancing both functionality and visual appeal. 15% of users were not satisfied with the design, often citing personal preferences for different control layouts or aesthetic styles. Some users felt that the design could be more modern or streamlined, while others mentioned that the visual indicators could be more prominent for easier visibility in low-light conditions. 85% Latency Performance 90% of users were highly satisfied with the latency performance of the MOTU UltraLite-mk5. They reported experiencing minimal latency during both recording and playback, which was crucial for professional audio production. Users praised the device's ability to handle complex audio tasks in real-time without noticeable delays, enhancing their recording efficiency and overall workflow. 10% of users experienced issues with latency, often related to specific configurations or software compatibility problems. These users reported delays that affected their recording sessions and found it challenging to resolve the issues without extensive troubleshooting. Such problems were particularly notable among users with unique or demanding audio setups. 90% Flexibility 88% of users praised the flexibility of the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 for its ability to cater to a wide range of audio production needs. They appreciated the variety of input and output options, which allowed them to easily adapt the device to different recording environments and workflows. Users were impressed by the device's capacity to support both simple and complex setups efficiently. 12% of users found the device less flexible than anticipated, often due to limitations in specific features or connectivity options. These users felt constrained by the interface's inability to seamlessly integrate with certain legacy equipment or less common software platforms, which limited their creative possibilities. 88% Power Supply 80% of users were satisfied with the power supply options of the MOTU UltraLite-mk5, appreciating the consistent performance and reliability. Many users noted that the device operated smoothly without power interruptions, and the inclusion of a power adapter was seen as a positive aspect for ensuring uninterrupted sessions. 20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the power supply, primarily due to the lack of a USB-powered option. Some users found the need for an external power adapter inconvenient, especially for portable use. Others reported occasional power-related issues, such as unexpected shutdowns or instability, which affected their recording sessions. 80% User Interface 75% of users were satisfied with the user interface of the MOTU UltraLite-mk5, finding it generally intuitive and easy to navigate. They appreciated the clear labeling and logical arrangement of controls, which facilitated a smooth user experience for both beginners and experienced users. 25% of users found the user interface challenging to navigate, citing a steep learning curve and a lack of intuitive features. These users often struggled with accessing advanced settings and felt that the interface could benefit from simplification or more user-friendly design elements to enhance ease of use. 75% Feature Set 85% of users were satisfied with the feature set offered by the MOTU UltraLite-mk5, praising the comprehensive range of functions suited to various audio production tasks. Users appreciated the advanced capabilities, such as onboard mixing and DSP, which they felt expanded their creative possibilities and enhanced their workflow. 15% of users felt that the feature set was either too complex or lacking in specific areas critical to their needs. These users often desired more streamlined features or additional capabilities that were not available, which limited their ability to fully utilize the device for their intended purposes. 85% Reliability 87% of users were satisfied with the reliability of the MOTU UltraLite-mk5, noting that it consistently performed well during extended use. Users valued the stability of the hardware and software, which allowed them to focus on their creative work without worrying about technical issues or unexpected failures. 13% of users experienced reliability issues, such as occasional software crashes or hardware malfunctions. These problems often required technical support or troubleshooting, which disrupted their workflow. Users with complex setups or those pushing the device to its limits were more likely to encounter such issues. 87% Learning Curve 70% of users found the learning curve manageable, particularly those with prior experience in audio production. They appreciated the detailed documentation and available tutorials, which helped them understand the device's capabilities and setup process over time. 30% of users found the learning curve steep, especially if they were new to audio interfaces or MOTU's ecosystem. These users often struggled with understanding the device's advanced features and integrating it into their existing setups, leading to frustration and a longer adaptation period. 70% Compatibility 82% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the MOTU UltraLite-mk5, particularly with major DAWs and operating systems. They appreciated the seamless integration and minimal setup required to get the interface up and running, which enhanced their overall user experience. 18% of users encountered compatibility issues, particularly with less common software or older operating systems. These users reported difficulties in achieving stable connections or full functionality, which often required additional troubleshooting or updates to resolve. 82% Visual Indicators 78% of users appreciated the visual indicators on the MOTU UltraLite-mk5, finding them helpful for monitoring levels and diagnosing issues quickly. The clear and responsive indicators were noted as useful tools for maintaining optimal audio quality during recording and playback. 22% of users felt that the visual indicators could be improved, citing issues such as small display size or insufficient brightness. These users often found it challenging to monitor levels accurately in different lighting conditions, leading to potential issues with audio quality management. 78% Setup Process 75% of users were satisfied with the setup process, finding it straightforward and well-documented. They appreciated the step-by-step guides and online resources that facilitated a smoother initial experience, allowing them to quickly integrate the device into their setups. 25% of users found the setup process challenging, particularly those less familiar with audio interfaces or technical configurations. These users often required additional support or guidance to complete the setup, which led to initial delays and frustrations. 75% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

85% of users appreciated the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, primarily due to its comprehensive feature set relative to its price point. Users highlighted that the interface offers high-quality preamps, plenty of inputs and outputs, and stable performance, making it a solid investment for both amateur and professional audio setups. Many users felt that the interface provides a similar level of quality to more expensive equipment, which adds to its perceived value.

15% of users found the purchase value lacking, often due to their expectations not being met when comparing the interface to more high-end alternatives. Some users felt that while the features are impressive, the price was still slightly too high for their needs, particularly when they did not require all the functionality offered. Additionally, a few users experienced issues with the software that influenced their perception of value.

85%
Quality of Materials

90% of users praised the quality of materials used in the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting its robust and durable build. Many users commented on the solid construction, which inspires confidence in its longevity and ability to withstand regular studio use. The sleek design and sturdy knobs and buttons were particularly appreciated, contributing to a professional feel.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of materials, citing minor issues such as plastic components that felt less durable. Some users also mentioned that the unit was heavier than expected, which affected portability for those who frequently move equipment between locations. Despite these concerns, they were relatively few compared to the overall satisfaction.

90%
Ease of Use

80% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 user-friendly, with straightforward setup and intuitive controls. The interface's compatibility with popular DAWs was a significant advantage, allowing for seamless integration into existing workflows. Many users appreciated the clear labeling and logical layout, which reduced the learning curve for new users.

20% of users experienced difficulties with ease of use, often related to initial setup issues or software installation challenges. Some users found the multiple input and output options overwhelming without prior experience, leading to confusion. A few users also encountered problems with firmware updates, which impacted their overall experience.

80%
Sound Quality

92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, praising its clarity and precision. The high-quality preamps and converters were frequently highlighted for their ability to deliver professional-grade audio, even in demanding recording environments. Users appreciated the clean and transparent sound, which enhanced their production capabilities.

8% of users were less impressed with the sound quality, often due to specific issues such as noise interference or perceived limitations in dynamic range. A few users noted that while the sound quality was generally good, it did not meet their high expectations based on previous experiences with more expensive equipment.

92%
Customer Support

75% of users reported positive experiences with Focusrite's customer support, citing helpful and responsive service when resolving issues. Many users appreciated the availability of online resources and tutorials, which facilitated troubleshooting and enhanced their understanding of the product.

25% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, often due to delayed response times or unresolved technical issues. Some users felt that the support team lacked sufficient knowledge to address their specific problems, leading to frustration. Additionally, a few users encountered difficulties accessing timely help during critical situations.

75%
Software Integration

78% of users were satisfied with the software integration capabilities of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting its compatibility with various digital audio workstations. The inclusion of bundled software was seen as a valuable addition, enhancing the overall production experience and providing additional creative tools.

22% of users faced challenges with software integration, often due to compatibility issues or difficulties in installing and configuring the bundled applications. Some users reported that the software did not always function as expected, leading to frustration and additional troubleshooting efforts.

78%
Latency Performance

82% of users were pleased with the low-latency performance of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, which facilitated smooth recording and playback without noticeable delays. The use of USB-C connectivity was particularly praised for its speed and reliability, contributing to an efficient workflow.

18% of users experienced latency issues, often related to specific system configurations or software settings. Some users found that achieving optimal performance required additional tweaking and adjustments, which detracted from their overall satisfaction.

82%
Portability

70% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 reasonably portable, appreciating its compact design that allowed for easy transportation between studio sessions. The sturdy build was seen as an advantage for those who needed to move the interface frequently.

30% of users were less satisfied with the portability, mainly due to the interface's weight and size. Some users felt that it was not the most convenient option for mobile recording setups, especially when compared to lighter and more compact alternatives.

70%
Durability

88% of users commended the durability of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting its ability to withstand regular use without significant wear and tear. The robust construction and quality materials were frequently mentioned as factors that contributed to its long-lasting performance.

12% of users raised concerns about durability, often due to specific issues such as loose knobs or minor cosmetic damage over time. Some users felt that certain components could be improved to ensure even greater resilience under heavy use.

88%
Aesthetic Design

85% of users appreciated the aesthetic design of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, praising its sleek and modern appearance. The interface's visual appeal was seen as a reflection of its professional quality, enhancing the overall studio environment.

15% of users were less impressed with the aesthetic design, often citing subjective preferences for different styles or colors. Some users felt that while the design was functional, it lacked the distinctive flair they preferred in studio equipment.

85%
Compatibility

80% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, highlighting its seamless integration with various operating systems and audio software. The interface's ability to work with both Mac and Windows platforms was a significant advantage for many users.

20% of users encountered compatibility issues, often related to specific software or hardware configurations. Some users had difficulties with driver installations or experienced conflicts with existing equipment, which impacted their overall satisfaction.

80%
Input/Output Options

90% of users were highly satisfied with the extensive input and output options available on the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20. The multiple channels and connectivity choices were seen as a key feature, providing flexibility for various recording and mixing setups.

10% of users found the input/output options overwhelming, particularly if they had simpler recording needs. Some users felt that the abundance of choices added unnecessary complexity to their workflow, especially if they did not utilize all the available connections.

90%
Preamps

91% of users were impressed with the quality of the preamps in the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting their clean and transparent sound. Many users highlighted the preamps as a standout feature, enhancing the overall audio quality and allowing for precise capture of sound sources.

9% of users had concerns about the preamps, often related to specific use cases or preferences for different tonal characteristics. Some users felt that the preamps could be improved to offer greater warmth or coloration, depending on their recording style.

91%
Stability

87% of users reported stable and reliable performance from the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, with minimal crashes or technical issues during use. The interface's dependability was seen as a crucial factor for uninterrupted recording sessions.

13% of users experienced stability issues, often related to software glitches or firmware updates. Some users encountered occasional crashes or connectivity problems, which disrupted their workflow and required additional troubleshooting.

87%
Driver Support

77% of users were satisfied with the driver support for the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting regular updates and compatibility with major operating systems. Many users appreciated the ease of accessing drivers and the proactive approach to resolving potential issues.

23% of users had challenges with driver support, often related to installation difficulties or outdated drivers causing compatibility issues. Some users felt that the support for certain operating systems could be improved to ensure smoother performance.

77%
Bundled Software

83% of users appreciated the bundled software that comes with the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, finding it to be a valuable addition to their audio production toolkit. The inclusion of DAWs and plugins was particularly appreciated, providing users with a complete package to start recording and mixing.

17% of users were less impressed with the bundled software, often due to limitations in functionality or compatibility issues with their preferred DAWs. Some users felt that the software did not add significant value to their setup, especially if they already owned similar tools.

83%
USB-C Connectivity

89% of users praised the USB-C connectivity of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, citing its fast data transfer rates and reliable connection. The modern interface was seen as a significant improvement over older connectivity standards, enhancing overall performance.

11% of users encountered issues with USB-C connectivity, often related to compatibility with existing equipment or the need for additional adapters. Some users felt that while USB-C is advantageous, it required them to upgrade other components in their setup, which was not always convenient.

89%
Control Software

79% of users found the control software for the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 to be intuitive and effective for managing various settings and configurations. The software's interface was praised for its user-friendly design and ease of use.

21% of users faced challenges with the control software, often due to bugs or limitations in functionality. Some users reported difficulties in navigating the interface or accessing advanced settings, which impacted their overall experience.

79%
Recording Quality

90% of users were satisfied with the recording quality achieved with the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting its ability to capture clear and detailed audio. The interface's performance in various recording scenarios was highly praised, contributing to professional-grade results.

10% of users were less satisfied with the recording quality, often due to specific issues such as noise or interference in certain environments. Some users felt that while the quality was generally good, it did not meet their expectations for more critical recording applications.

90%
Versatility

88% of users appreciated the versatility of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, highlighting its ability to adapt to a wide range of recording and mixing tasks. The interface's flexibility in handling different audio sources and configurations was seen as a key strength.

12% of users found the versatility to be limited, often due to specific needs that the interface could not accommodate. Some users felt that while the interface was versatile, it lacked certain specialized features required for particular audio production tasks.

88%

Purchase Value

85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the price point to be reasonable given the high-quality features and performance it offers. Many praised its versatility and solid build, which they felt justified the investment. Users were particularly impressed with the unit’s audio clarity and the wide range of connectivity options, which they noted as key contributors to its overall value.

15% of users felt that the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 was overpriced compared to similar products available in the market. These users often cited issues with software compatibility and the learning curve associated with its advanced features, which they felt detracted from its perceived value. Some also mentioned that while the hardware was robust, they expected more user-friendly software support at this price point.

85%
Quality of Materials

90% of users were highly satisfied with the quality of materials used in the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the sturdy construction and premium feel, noting that the device seemed built to last. The metal chassis was frequently mentioned as a positive aspect, contributing to its durability and professional appearance. Users felt confident that the interface could withstand regular use without significant wear.

10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of materials. Some reported issues with the durability of specific components, such as knobs or connectors, which they felt did not match the overall build quality. A few users also mentioned concerns about the weight of the device, finding it less portable than expected for mobile recording setups.

90%
Ease of Use

75% of users found the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 relatively easy to use once they became familiar with its functions. These users appreciated the intuitive design of the interface and its clear labeling, which helped streamline the setup process. Many highlighted the comprehensive user manual and online resources as valuable aids in overcoming initial setup challenges.

25% of users found the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 challenging to use, particularly due to its complex setup process and advanced features. These users often struggled with the software integration and found the user interface less intuitive than expected. Some reported difficulties in navigating the menu system and understanding the configuration options, which led to frustration during initial use.

75%
Sound Quality

95% of users were extremely satisfied with the sound quality of the MOTU UltraLite-mk5. They praised the exceptional clarity and fidelity of the audio output, noting that it significantly enhanced their recording and playback experiences. Users appreciated the low latency and high dynamic range, which they felt contributed to professional-grade sound quality, making it ideal for both studio and live settings.

5% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, although these were isolated cases. Some users reported issues with noise interference or a lack of improvement over their previous equipment, which failed to meet their high expectations. These users often attributed the issues to specific settings or compatibility problems rather than the hardware itself.

95%
Connectivity Options

88% of users were pleased with the connectivity options provided by the MOTU UltraLite-mk5. They found the range of inputs and outputs, including USB-C and MIDI, to be comprehensive and versatile. Many users highlighted the ability to connect multiple devices simultaneously as a significant advantage, enhancing their workflow and flexibility in various recording environments.

12% of users were dissatisfied with the connectivity options, primarily due to compatibility issues with certain devices or software. Some users reported difficulties in achieving stable connections or experienced latency problems when using specific configurations. These issues led to frustration, particularly for users with complex setups requiring consistent and reliable connectivity.

88%
Durability

92% of users found the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 to be highly durable. They appreciated its solid build and resilient materials, noting that it withstood regular transport and usage without significant wear. Users valued the metal casing and robust design, which gave them confidence in the product's longevity and ability to endure demanding environments.

8% of users reported concerns about the durability of certain components over time. Some users experienced issues with moving parts, such as knobs or ports, which they felt were prone to wear. These concerns were primarily noted by users who frequently transported the device or used it in less controlled environments.

92%
Portability

80% of users were satisfied with the portability of the MOTU UltraLite-mk5, citing its compact size and lightweight design as beneficial for mobile recording. Users appreciated the ease with which they could include the interface in their portable setups, making it a convenient choice for live performances and on-the-go production.

20% of users found the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 less portable than expected, largely due to its weight and the need for additional accessories. Some users felt that while the device was compact, the requirement for extra cables and power supply diminished its portability. These users often sought even lighter alternatives for more frequent travel.

80%
Software Integration

70% of users were satisfied with the software integration offered by the MOTU UltraLite-mk5. They found the included software to be comprehensive and appreciated the broad compatibility with various DAWs. Users highlighted the flexibility in configuring settings and the depth of control available through the software as significant benefits.

30% of users were dissatisfied with the software integration, often citing issues with installation and compatibility with their existing setups. Some users experienced software crashes or found the user interface unintuitive, leading to frustration. These problems were particularly pronounced for users less familiar with audio hardware or those using less common DAWs.

70%
Customer Support

78% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by MOTU. They appreciated the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, noting that inquiries were generally addressed promptly. Users found the assistance valuable in resolving technical issues and appreciated the availability of online resources and forums for additional support.

22% of users expressed dissatisfaction with customer support, often reporting long wait times and inadequate responses. Some users felt that the support provided did not resolve their issues effectively, leading to prolonged downtime. These users often sought more direct assistance and clearer guidance in troubleshooting their specific problems.

78%
Design and Aesthetics

85% of users were satisfied with the design and aesthetics of the MOTU UltraLite-mk5. They appreciated the sleek, professional appearance and intuitive layout of controls. Many users noted that the design contributed to a positive user experience, with controls easily accessible and clearly labeled, enhancing both functionality and visual appeal.

15% of users were not satisfied with the design, often citing personal preferences for different control layouts or aesthetic styles. Some users felt that the design could be more modern or streamlined, while others mentioned that the visual indicators could be more prominent for easier visibility in low-light conditions.

85%
Latency Performance

90% of users were highly satisfied with the latency performance of the MOTU UltraLite-mk5. They reported experiencing minimal latency during both recording and playback, which was crucial for professional audio production. Users praised the device's ability to handle complex audio tasks in real-time without noticeable delays, enhancing their recording efficiency and overall workflow.

10% of users experienced issues with latency, often related to specific configurations or software compatibility problems. These users reported delays that affected their recording sessions and found it challenging to resolve the issues without extensive troubleshooting. Such problems were particularly notable among users with unique or demanding audio setups.

90%
Flexibility

88% of users praised the flexibility of the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 for its ability to cater to a wide range of audio production needs. They appreciated the variety of input and output options, which allowed them to easily adapt the device to different recording environments and workflows. Users were impressed by the device's capacity to support both simple and complex setups efficiently.

12% of users found the device less flexible than anticipated, often due to limitations in specific features or connectivity options. These users felt constrained by the interface's inability to seamlessly integrate with certain legacy equipment or less common software platforms, which limited their creative possibilities.

88%
Power Supply

80% of users were satisfied with the power supply options of the MOTU UltraLite-mk5, appreciating the consistent performance and reliability. Many users noted that the device operated smoothly without power interruptions, and the inclusion of a power adapter was seen as a positive aspect for ensuring uninterrupted sessions.

20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the power supply, primarily due to the lack of a USB-powered option. Some users found the need for an external power adapter inconvenient, especially for portable use. Others reported occasional power-related issues, such as unexpected shutdowns or instability, which affected their recording sessions.

80%
User Interface

75% of users were satisfied with the user interface of the MOTU UltraLite-mk5, finding it generally intuitive and easy to navigate. They appreciated the clear labeling and logical arrangement of controls, which facilitated a smooth user experience for both beginners and experienced users.

25% of users found the user interface challenging to navigate, citing a steep learning curve and a lack of intuitive features. These users often struggled with accessing advanced settings and felt that the interface could benefit from simplification or more user-friendly design elements to enhance ease of use.

75%
Feature Set

85% of users were satisfied with the feature set offered by the MOTU UltraLite-mk5, praising the comprehensive range of functions suited to various audio production tasks. Users appreciated the advanced capabilities, such as onboard mixing and DSP, which they felt expanded their creative possibilities and enhanced their workflow.

15% of users felt that the feature set was either too complex or lacking in specific areas critical to their needs. These users often desired more streamlined features or additional capabilities that were not available, which limited their ability to fully utilize the device for their intended purposes.

85%
Reliability

87% of users were satisfied with the reliability of the MOTU UltraLite-mk5, noting that it consistently performed well during extended use. Users valued the stability of the hardware and software, which allowed them to focus on their creative work without worrying about technical issues or unexpected failures.

13% of users experienced reliability issues, such as occasional software crashes or hardware malfunctions. These problems often required technical support or troubleshooting, which disrupted their workflow. Users with complex setups or those pushing the device to its limits were more likely to encounter such issues.

87%
Learning Curve

70% of users found the learning curve manageable, particularly those with prior experience in audio production. They appreciated the detailed documentation and available tutorials, which helped them understand the device's capabilities and setup process over time.

30% of users found the learning curve steep, especially if they were new to audio interfaces or MOTU's ecosystem. These users often struggled with understanding the device's advanced features and integrating it into their existing setups, leading to frustration and a longer adaptation period.

70%
Compatibility

82% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the MOTU UltraLite-mk5, particularly with major DAWs and operating systems. They appreciated the seamless integration and minimal setup required to get the interface up and running, which enhanced their overall user experience.

18% of users encountered compatibility issues, particularly with less common software or older operating systems. These users reported difficulties in achieving stable connections or full functionality, which often required additional troubleshooting or updates to resolve.

82%
Visual Indicators

78% of users appreciated the visual indicators on the MOTU UltraLite-mk5, finding them helpful for monitoring levels and diagnosing issues quickly. The clear and responsive indicators were noted as useful tools for maintaining optimal audio quality during recording and playback.

22% of users felt that the visual indicators could be improved, citing issues such as small display size or insufficient brightness. These users often found it challenging to monitor levels accurately in different lighting conditions, leading to potential issues with audio quality management.

78%
Setup Process

75% of users were satisfied with the setup process, finding it straightforward and well-documented. They appreciated the step-by-step guides and online resources that facilitated a smoother initial experience, allowing them to quickly integrate the device into their setups.

25% of users found the setup process challenging, particularly those less familiar with audio interfaces or technical configurations. These users often required additional support or guidance to complete the setup, which led to initial delays and frustrations.

75%

Pros:
High-quality preamps with Air mode for enhanced sound. 8 mic/line inputs and 10 line outputs for versatile connectivity. USB-C connectivity for faster data transfer and low latency. Comprehensive software bundle including DAWs and plug-ins. Expandable via ADAT for additional inputs and outputs.	High-quality audio with 24-bit/192kHz resolution. Comprehensive I/O options including 10 inputs and 8 outputs. User-friendly software for easy control and monitoring. Solid build quality and compact design for portability. Low-latency performance suitable for professional use.

Cons:
Higher price point compared to entry-level interfaces. Might be overkill for small home studios with minimal input needs. No Thunderbolt support, which might be preferable for some users.	Higher price point compared to some competing models. No dedicated physical MIDI controls. Learning curve for beginners due to extensive features. Limited onboard DSP effects.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 8 Inputs / 10 Outputs Digital: 10 Inputs / 10 Outputs	Analog: 8 Inputs / 12 Outputs Digital: 10 Inputs / 10 Outputs
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
8 Preamps	2 Preamps
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input 6x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 10x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Monitor Output 2x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 6x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Input 10x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output (DC-Coupled) 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Digital Audio I/O
1x RCA Coaxial S/PDIF Input 1x RCA Coaxial S/PDIF Output 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Input (S/MUX Support) 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT Input (S/MUX Support) 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Output (S/MUX Support) 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT Output (S/MUX Support)	1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Input 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Output 1x RCA Coaxial S/PDIF Input 1x RCA Coaxial S/PDIF Output
Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C (Class-Compliant)
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.12 macOS 10.13 macOS 10.14 macOS 10.15 macOS 11 Windows 7 or Later	macOS 10.11 or Later Windows 10 13.5 or Later
Power Requirements
AC Input	AC/DC Power Adapter (Included)

The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface both offer robust features for audio production, but they cater to slightly different needs in terms of I/O channels, microphone preamps, and digital connectivity.
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 (3rd Generation) provides a comprehensive set of I/O channels, featuring 8 analog inputs and 10 analog outputs. It includes 8 microphone preamps, which makes it highly suitable for recording multiple vocalists or instruments simultaneously. The analog audio I/O includes 2 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced mic/line/Hi-Z inputs and 6 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line inputs. Additionally, it offers 10 1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced line/monitor outputs and 2 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone outputs. On the digital side, it has 1 RCA coaxial S/PDIF input and output, and multiple TOSLINK optical ADAT/S/PDIF inputs and outputs supporting S/MUX. The interface connects to the host via USB-C and is compatible with macOS 10.12 and later, as well as Windows 7 or later. It requires an AC power input for operation.
On the other hand, the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 offers a slightly different configuration with its 8 analog inputs and 12 analog outputs. It includes 2 microphone preamps, which might be more limiting for users needing to record multiple microphones simultaneously compared to the Scarlett 18i20. The analog audio I/O features 2 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced mic/line/Hi-Z inputs on the front panel, 6 1/4" TRS balanced line inputs, and 10 1/4" TRS balanced line outputs (DC-coupled). Additionally, it provides 1 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output on the front panel. For digital audio I/O, it includes 1 TOSLINK optical ADAT/S/PDIF input and output, as well as 1 RCA coaxial S/PDIF input and output. The interface also uses USB-C for host connection and is class-compliant, ensuring broad compatibility with macOS 10.11 or later, Windows 10, and iOS 13.5 or later. Power is supplied via an included AC/DC power adapter.
In summary, the Scarlett 18i20 (3rd Gen) is designed for users needing more microphone inputs and a variety of analog and digital I/O options, while the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 is geared towards users who prioritize a higher number of analog outputs and class-compliant USB-C connectivity. Both interfaces support high-resolution audio with a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit depth, making them suitable for professional audio production environments.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 8 Inputs / 10 Outputs Digital: 10 Inputs / 10 Outputs	Analog: 8 Inputs / 12 Outputs Digital: 10 Inputs / 10 Outputs
Built-In DSP
	Yes
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
8 Preamps	2 Preamps
Built-In Microphone

Input Level Adjustment
8x Knob	2x Knob
Expansion Slots

The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface each offer unique features that cater to different recording and production needs.
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 provides a robust I/O configuration with 8 analog inputs and 10 analog outputs, complemented by an additional 10 digital inputs and outputs. It features 8 microphone preamps, making it an excellent choice for users who require multiple mic inputs for recording drums, bands, or podcasts. The device supports a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit, ensuring high-fidelity audio capture. Input level adjustment is facilitated through 8 dedicated knobs, offering precise control over each input channel. However, it does not include built-in DSP or expansion slots.
On the other hand, the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 also offers a versatile I/O setup with 8 analog inputs and a slightly higher count of 12 analog outputs, alongside the same 10 digital inputs and outputs as the Scarlett. While it features only 2 microphone preamps, it compensates with built-in DSP, providing built-in effects and processing capabilities that can be a significant advantage for real-time monitoring and mixing. Like the Scarlett, it supports a 192 kHz / 24-bit maximum sampling rate, ensuring top-quality audio. The input level adjustment is managed through 2 knobs, which might be less convenient for users needing more mic preamp control. Similar to the Scarlett, it lacks expansion slots.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 excels in providing multiple microphone inputs and individual input control knobs, making it ideal for multi-mic setups. The MOTU UltraLite-mk5 stands out with its built-in DSP and additional output channels, making it more suitable for users who need on-board effects processing and a broader range of output options.

Signal Processing
Pad
-10 dB (Switchable per Channel)	Mic: -20 dB (Switchable per Channel)
Gain/Trim Range
Mic/Line Inputs: 56 dB	Mic Inputs: Up to +74 dB
High-Pass Filter

Solo/Mute
Mute per Master

The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface both offer unique features tailored to different audio production needs.
Starting with the pad specifications, the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 includes a -10 dB pad that is switchable per channel, which is useful for managing input levels and preventing distortion on high-gain sources. On the other hand, the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 features a more substantial -20 dB pad for its mic inputs, also switchable per channel, offering greater flexibility for handling very loud sources without clipping.
When it comes to gain/trim range, the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 offers a gain range of 56 dB for its mic/line inputs, which is adequate for a wide variety of microphones and line-level sources. In contrast, the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 boasts a more extensive gain range of up to +74 dB for its mic inputs. This higher gain range makes the UltraLite-mk5 particularly suitable for low-sensitivity microphones, such as ribbons or dynamic mics, providing more headroom and versatility in gain staging.
Both interfaces lack a high-pass filter, which means users would need to manage low-frequency content through their DAW or external hardware if needed.
Regarding solo/mute functionality, the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 includes a mute control per master, allowing users to quickly mute the output, which can be useful during recording and mixing sessions. The MOTU UltraLite-mk5, however, does not offer built-in solo/mute functions.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 and the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 each have distinct strengths. The Scarlett 18i20's pad and mute features provide control over input and output levels, while the UltraLite-mk5 excels with its higher gain range and more substantial pad, making it more versatile for different microphone types and louder sources.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input 6x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 10x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Monitor Output 2x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 6x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Input 10x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output (DC-Coupled) 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Phantom Power
48 V, Selectable On/Off (on 8 Channels)	48 V, Selectable On/Off (Selectable on Individual Inputs)
Digital Audio I/O
1x RCA Coaxial S/PDIF Input 1x RCA Coaxial S/PDIF Output 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Input (S/MUX Support) 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT Input (S/MUX Support) 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Output (S/MUX Support) 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT Output (S/MUX Support)	1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Input 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Output 1x RCA Coaxial S/PDIF Input 1x RCA Coaxial S/PDIF Output
Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C (Class-Compliant)
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0	USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)

Sync I/O
1x BNC Word Clock Output
Network I/O

MIDI I/O
1x DIN 5-Pin Input 1x DIN 5-Pin Output	1x DIN 5-Pin Input 1x DIN 5-Pin Output

The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 (3rd Generation) and the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 are both USB-C Audio/MIDI interfaces designed to meet the needs of professional audio recording and production, but they have distinct differences in their specifications.
Analog Audio I/O: The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 offers a more extensive array of analog audio inputs and outputs compared to the MOTU UltraLite-mk5. It features 2 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced mic/line/Hi-Z inputs, 6 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line inputs, and 10 1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced line/monitor outputs, along with 2 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone outputs. On the other hand, the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 includes 2 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced mic/line/Hi-Z inputs on the front panel, 6 1/4" TRS balanced line inputs, 10 1/4" TRS balanced line outputs (DC-coupled), and a single 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output on the front panel.
Phantom Power: Both interfaces provide 48 V phantom power, but the Scarlett 18i20 applies it to 8 channels collectively, while the UltraLite-mk5 allows selectable phantom power on individual inputs, offering more flexibility for different microphone setups.
Digital Audio I/O: In terms of digital audio connectivity, both interfaces are equipped with similar options. The Scarlett 18i20 includes 1 RCA coaxial S/PDIF input and output, and 4 TOSLINK optical ADAT inputs/outputs with S/MUX support. The UltraLite-mk5 offers 1 TOSLINK optical ADAT/S/PDIF input and output, and 1 RCA coaxial S/PDIF input and output, which is slightly less extensive than the Scarlett 18i20's configuration.
Host Connection and Protocol: Both the Scarlett 18i20 and the UltraLite-mk5 use a USB-C connection and adhere to the USB 2.0 host connection protocol. Neither device offers additional USB (non-host) or network I/O capabilities.
Sync and MIDI I/O: The Scarlett 18i20 includes a BNC word clock output for synchronization, which the UltraLite-mk5 lacks. However, both interfaces provide the same MIDI I/O configuration with 1 DIN 5-pin input and 1 DIN 5-pin output.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 (3rd Generation) stands out for its more extensive analog I/O options and synchronization capability, making it ideal for users needing a higher number of inputs and outputs. The MOTU UltraLite-mk5, while offering fewer I/O options, provides individual phantom power control, making it more flexible for users who need to manage multiple microphone types and configurations.

Performance
Maximum Input Level
Mic Inputs: +9 dBu (Min Gain) +16 dBu (Min Gain, with Pad) Hi-Z Inputs: +12.5 dBu (Min Gain) +14 dBu (Min Gain, with Pad) Line Inputs: +22 dBu (Min Gain) +29 dBu (Min Gain, with Pad)	Mic Inputs: 0 dBu Line Inputs: +24 dBu
Maximum Output Level
Line Outputs: +15.5 dBu (Balanced) Headphone Outputs: +7 dBu	Line Outputs: +21 dBu Headphone Outputs: +14 dBu
Impedance
Mic Inputs: 3 Kilohms Hi-Z Inputs: 1.5 Megohms Line Inputs: 60 Kilohms Line Outputs: 430 Ohms Headphone Outputs: < 1 Ohm	Line/Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohm
Dynamic Range
Mic Inputs: 111 dBA Hi-Z Inputs: 110 dBA Line Inputs: 110.5 dBA Line Outputs: 108.5 dBA Headphone Outputs: 104 dBA	Mic Inputs: 115 dB (A-Weighted) Line Inputs: 120 dB (A-Weighted) Line Outputs: 125 dB (A-Weighted) Headphone Outputs: 118 dB (A-Weighted)
THD+N
Mic Inputs: < 0.0012% Hi-Z Inputs: < 0.03% Line Inputs: < 0.002% Line Outputs: < 0.002% Headphone Outputs: < 0.002%	Mic Inputs: -113 dB Line Inputs: -114 dB / 0.0002% (Unweighted) Line Outputs: -114 dB / 0.0002% (Unweighted) Headphone Outputs: -110 dB / 0.0003% (Unweighted)
EIN
Mic Inputs: -128 dB A-Weighted	Mic Inputs: -129 dBu

The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 and MOTU UltraLite-mk5 are both high-quality USB-C Audio/MIDI interfaces, each boasting impressive specifications tailored to different professional audio needs.
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 features a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz, with a ±0.1 dB deviation, ensuring a flat and accurate sound reproduction across the audible spectrum. Its maximum input levels vary by type: mic inputs can handle up to +9 dBu (or +16 dBu with pad), Hi-Z inputs up to +12.5 dBu (or +14 dBu with pad), and line inputs up to +22 dBu (or +29 dBu with pad). The maximum output levels are +15.5 dBu for line outputs and +7 dBu for headphone outputs.
In terms of impedance, the Scarlett 18i20 offers 3 Kilohms for mic inputs, 1.5 Megohms for Hi-Z inputs, 60 Kilohms for line inputs, 430 Ohms for line outputs, and less than 1 Ohm for headphone outputs. The dynamic range is robust, with 111 dBA for mic inputs, 110 dBA for Hi-Z inputs, 110.5 dBA for line inputs, 108.5 dBA for line outputs, and 104 dBA for headphone outputs. The Total Harmonic Distortion plus Noise (THD+N) values are impressively low across the board: less than 0.0012% for mic inputs, less than 0.03% for Hi-Z inputs, less than 0.002% for line inputs and outputs, and less than 0.002% for headphone outputs. Lastly, the Equivalent Input Noise (EIN) for mic inputs is -128 dB A-weighted.
The MOTU UltraLite-mk5, on the other hand, has a maximum input level of 0 dBu for mic inputs and +24 dBu for line inputs. The maximum output levels are higher than the Scarlett, with +21 dBu for line outputs and +14 dBu for headphone outputs. The impedance for line/Hi-Z inputs is 1 Megohm.
The dynamic range of the UltraLite-mk5 is exceptional, with 115 dB (A-weighted) for mic inputs, 120 dB (A-weighted) for line inputs, 125 dB (A-weighted) for line outputs, and 118 dB (A-weighted) for headphone outputs. The THD+N values are extremely low: -113 dB for mic inputs, -114 dB / 0.0002% (unweighted) for line inputs and outputs, and -110 dB / 0.0003% (unweighted) for headphone outputs. The EIN for mic inputs is slightly better than the Scarlett at -129 dBu.
In summary, while both interfaces offer high-quality audio performance, the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 stands out with higher dynamic range and lower THD+N values, making it potentially more suitable for environments where the utmost audio fidelity is required. The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, however, offers a broader range of input and output options, making it a versatile choice for various recording setups.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
Up to 192 kHz (AD/DA Conversion)	44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 / 176.4 / 192 kHz
Sample Rate Conversion

Bit Depths
Up to 24-Bit (AD/DA Conversion)	24-Bit
Sync Sources
ADAT, Internal, S/PDIF	ADAT, Internal, S/PDIF

When comparing the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface, several features highlight their capabilities and distinctions.
Both interfaces support high sample rates, with the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 and the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 offering sample rates up to 192 kHz for AD/DA conversion, ensuring high-quality audio recording and playback. Neither interface includes sample rate conversion, which means they both rely on the sample rates supported natively.
In terms of bit depths, both the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 and the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 provide up to 24-bit resolution for AD/DA conversion. This bit depth is standard for professional audio interfaces, allowing for a wide dynamic range and high-resolution audio.
When it comes to sync sources, both models support ADAT, internal, and S/PDIF synchronization. This ensures compatibility and flexibility in various recording setups, allowing them to be easily integrated into different studio environments.
A distinguishing feature of the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 is its latency performance. The UltraLite-mk5 boasts a latency of 2.4 ms at 96 kHz, which is dependent on the buffer size and the path from input to output. This low latency is crucial for real-time monitoring and recording, providing a smoother experience for musicians and audio engineers.
In summary, both the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 and the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 offer high sample rates and bit depths, supporting professional audio quality. They also share similar sync source capabilities. However, the MOTU UltraLite-mk5's low latency performance at 96 kHz sets it apart, making it a more suitable option for users who require minimal delay during recording and monitoring sessions.

Audio Storage & Playback
Memory Card Slot

Both the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface are high-quality audio interfaces designed for professional audio production, but they do not feature memory card slots.
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 (3rd Gen) features USB-C connectivity, offering 18 inputs and 20 outputs, making it an excellent choice for larger recording setups. It includes 8 Scarlett mic preamps, ADAT I/O, and MIDI I/O, ensuring extensive connectivity options. The unit also boasts high-performance converters capable of up to 24-bit/192kHz AD/DA conversion, ensuring pristine audio quality. Other features include a user-friendly interface and comprehensive software bundle, making it accessible for both beginners and seasoned professionals.
Similarly, the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 also connects via USB-C and is known for its compact yet versatile design. It offers 18 inputs and 22 outputs, including 2 mic preamps, 6 line inputs, and 10 line outputs, supplemented by ADAT I/O and MIDI I/O. The UltraLite-mk5 stands out with its ultra-low latency performance and high-quality ESS Sabre32 Ultra DAC technology, providing up to 24-bit/192kHz audio resolution. It also includes an integrated DSP for effects and mixing, as well as comprehensive metering and control options via the front panel and software.
In summary, both interfaces lack memory card slots but offer extensive input/output capabilities, high-resolution audio, and USB-C connectivity. The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 is more suited for larger setups with its 8 mic preamps, while the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 offers compact versatility with its advanced DAC technology and integrated DSP.

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.12 macOS 10.13 macOS 10.14 macOS 10.15 macOS 11 Windows 7 or Later	macOS 10.11 or Later Windows 10 13.5 or Later
Mobile App Compatible
Yes: iPadOS Only	Yes
Mobile Device Compatibility
	iPad iPhone iPod Touch
Required Hardware
Available USB 2.0 Port USB Cable (Included)	Available USB 2.0 Port
Internet Connection
Required for Software/Driver Download	Required for Registration, Software/Driver Download

The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface both offer robust features for audio and MIDI interfacing, but they have some differences in terms of OS compatibility, mobile app compatibility, and hardware requirements.
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 (3rd Generation) is compatible with macOS versions from 10.12 to macOS 11 and requires Windows 7 or later. It is specifically compatible with iPadOS for mobile applications but does not support other mobile devices. The interface necessitates an available USB 2.0 port and includes the necessary USB cable. Users also need an internet connection for software and driver downloads.
On the other hand, the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 supports a wider range of macOS versions, starting from macOS 10.11 and later, including macOS 13.5 and later, and requires Windows 10. It is mobile app compatible with iPad, iPhone, and iPod Touch, offering broader mobile device compatibility. The hardware requirements include an available USB 2.0 port, and users need an internet connection for registration and software/driver downloads. Additionally, this interface outlines specific processor and RAM requirements, recommending Intel Core i3 or better for both Mac and PC, and 8 GB of RAM for optimal performance, with a minimum of 4 GB.
In summary, while both interfaces require a USB 2.0 port and internet connection for software necessities, the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 has more specific OS and mobile device limitations compared to the MOTU UltraLite-mk5, which offers broader compatibility and more detailed hardware requirements for optimal operation.

Power
Power Requirements
AC Input	AC/DC Power Adapter (Included)

The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface have distinct power requirements that reflect their design and use cases.
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 requires an AC input for power, operating at a voltage range of 100 to 240 VAC with a frequency of 50 to 60 Hz. This broad range allows it to be used in various regions without the need for a voltage converter. The power consumption for the Scarlett 18i20 is rated at 30 watts, indicating its energy usage during operation.
In contrast, the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 comes with an included AC/DC power adapter, which provides flexibility in power sources. The adapter supports a voltage range of 12 to 18 VDC at 1 ampere, and it can accommodate center-positive or center-negative configurations. This makes the UltraLite-mk5 adaptable to different power supply situations, which can be particularly useful for mobile recording setups.
Both interfaces are designed to deliver high performance, but their power requirements highlight the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20’s suitability for studio environments where a consistent AC power source is available, while the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 offers more versatility with its adaptable DC power options, making it ideal for both studio and on-the-go recording.

Physical
Rackmount Size
1 RU (with Included Hardware)	1 RU (with Optional Hardware, 1/2-Rack)
Dimensions
19 x 10.23 x 1.83" / 48.3 x 25.98 x 4.65 cm	8.6 x 6.9 x 1.75" / 21.8 x 17.5 x 4.45 cm
Weight
7.2 lb / 3.3 kg	2.9 lb / 1.3 kg

The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface differ significantly in their physical specifications and rackmount capabilities.
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 is a full 1 RU rackmount unit with included hardware, making it suitable for standard 19-inch racks. Its dimensions are 19 x 10.23 x 1.83 inches (48.3 x 25.98 x 4.65 cm) and it weighs 7.2 lbs (3.3 kg). This larger size and weight suggest that the Scarlett 18i20 is designed for a more permanent installation in a studio environment where rack space and weight are not major concerns.
On the other hand, the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 is a more compact and lightweight option, also designed to fit a 1 RU rack but requiring optional hardware and occupying only half the rack's width. Its dimensions are 8.6 x 6.9 x 1.75 inches (21.8 x 17.5 x 4.45 cm) and it weighs only 2.9 lbs (1.3 kg). This makes the UltraLite-mk5 a more portable solution, ideal for users who need a high-quality interface that can be easily transported or used in smaller spaces where full rack units are impractical.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 offers a robust, full-rack solution with substantial weight and size, suitable for dedicated studio setups. In contrast, the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 provides a more compact and portable alternative, designed for flexibility and ease of transportation, catering to users with limited space or those requiring mobility.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
9.8 lb	4.87 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
23.7 x 12.8 x 3.5"	14.8 x 11.4 x 5.5"

The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface both serve as robust solutions for professional audio and MIDI interfacing, yet they differ significantly in terms of physical specifications.
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 has a package weight of 9.8 pounds and box dimensions of 23.7 x 12.8 x 3.5 inches. This indicates a larger and heavier unit, potentially offering a more extensive feature set or additional hardware components. Its larger size might also suggest a more complex setup or more comprehensive connectivity options ideal for a studio environment.
In contrast, the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 is considerably lighter with a package weight of just 4.87 pounds and smaller box dimensions of 14.8 x 11.4 x 5.5 inches. This compact and lightweight design highlights its portability, making it a convenient option for mobile recording applications or smaller workspaces where space is at a premium.
Both interfaces utilize USB-C for modern connectivity, ensuring high-speed data transfer and compatibility with contemporary devices. However, based on the physical specifications alone, the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 appears to be designed for a more stationary and potentially more feature-rich studio setting, whereas the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 offers a more portable solution without compromising on professional quality.