RODE AI-1 vs Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen): Which Audio Interface is Right for You?

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface are both excellent choices for home studio setups, but they cater to slightly different user preferences and needs.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen) is renowned for its high-quality preamps and excellent build quality. It features two combination inputs (XLR and ¼” TRS) that accommodate both microphones and instruments, making it highly versatile. The preamps offer a natural sound with low noise, and the interface includes Focusrite’s Air mode, which adds brightness and presence to recordings, emulating the classic ISA preamps. The 2i2 offers up to 24-bit/192kHz resolution, ensuring pristine audio quality. It also includes a comprehensive software bundle with Ableton Live Lite, Pro Tools First Focusrite Creative Pack, and various plug-ins and loops, providing a complete package for beginners and seasoned producers alike. Its user-friendly design and intuitive controls make it a go-to for musicians and podcasters seeking reliability and high performance.
On the other hand, the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface is designed with simplicity and durability in mind. It features a single Neutrik combo jack that supports both XLR and ¼” inputs, making it ideal for solo recording artists or podcasters. The AI-1 boasts a Class-A preamp that delivers clean and transparent sound, with zero-latency monitoring through its high-quality headphone output. The interface supports up to 24-bit/96kHz resolution, which is slightly lower than the Scarlett 2i2 but still offers excellent audio fidelity. The robust metal chassis ensures durability, and the straightforward design makes it exceptionally easy to use, especially for those who prefer a plug-and-play setup. The AI-1 is also bundled with Ableton Live Lite, providing essential tools to get started.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen) is ideal for users who need multiple inputs and a comprehensive software package, along with the added benefit of the Air mode for enhanced sound quality. It is perfect for musicians and producers who require versatility and high performance. The RODE AI-1, with its simpler design and robust build, is perfect for solo artists or podcasters who prioritize ease of use and durability. Both interfaces offer excellent audio quality and reliability, making them strong contenders in the USB-C audio interface market.

In-Depth Comparison: Specifications, Advantages, and Disadvantages

Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation)

RODE AI-1

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the balance between affordability and functionality, making it an excellent choice for both beginners and professionals. Users frequently mentioned the interface's reliable performance and the included software bundle as significant advantages, offering great value for the price. 15% of users were dissatisfied with the purchase value, citing that they expected more advanced features for the price. Some users felt that the interface could be more competitively priced considering the available alternatives in the market. 85% Quality of Materials 90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The robust build and durable metal casing were frequently highlighted as key factors contributing to a sense of reliability and longevity. Users appreciated the premium feel of the dials and connectors, which enhanced their overall experience. 10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of materials, noting that some components felt slightly less durable over time. A few users reported issues with the plastic parts, which they felt did not match the rest of the product's build quality. 90% Ease of Use 88% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface easy to use. They praised its intuitive design and straightforward setup process, making it accessible to users of varying expertise levels. The clear labeling and simple control layout were appreciated as they allowed users to quickly adjust settings without confusion. 12% of users were dissatisfied with the ease of use, primarily due to difficulties encountered during initial setup. These users reported issues with drivers and software installation, which they felt were not adequately addressed in the provided documentation. 88% Sound Quality 92% of users were impressed with the sound quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, noting its clear and crisp audio output as a standout feature. Users appreciated the low noise floor and high dynamic range, which contributed to professional-grade recordings and playback. 8% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, mentioning occasional latency issues and minor distortion at high volumes. Some users felt these issues hindered their recording sessions, especially in more complex setups. 92% Compatibility 87% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing its seamless integration with various DAWs and operating systems as a major advantage. Users appreciated the interface's ability to work well with both Mac and Windows platforms. 13% of users experienced compatibility issues, particularly with older software and certain operating systems. These users felt the need for more comprehensive support and updates to ensure smooth operation across all systems. 87% Portability 85% of users praised the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, highlighting its compact size and lightweight design. This made it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions or gigs, which was a significant plus for users frequently on the move. 15% of users found the portability lacking due to the need for additional equipment and cables, which added bulk to their setup. Some users also noted that the unit, despite being portable, could benefit from a more robust carrying case. 85% Durability 88% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often commenting on its sturdy construction. Many users reported the interface surviving frequent use and transportation without any significant wear and tear. 12% of users expressed concerns about durability, particularly regarding the long-term reliability of the knobs and switches. Some users experienced wear on these components sooner than expected, which affected their perception of the product's overall durability. 88% Aesthetics 90% of users were pleased with the aesthetics of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often mentioning its sleek and modern design. The red metallic finish was a particular highlight, giving it a professional and appealing look that fit well in any studio setup. 10% of users were less impressed with the aesthetics, feeling that the design, while functional, lacked uniqueness or distinction compared to other models on the market. Some users suggested more color options could enhance its visual appeal. 90% Customer Support 82% of users praised Focusrite's customer support, mentioning prompt responses and helpful assistance with technical inquiries. Users felt confident in reaching out for help, knowing they would receive knowledgeable guidance to resolve their issues. 18% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses and unhelpful troubleshooting advice. These users expressed frustration with the lack of immediate support, especially when dealing with urgent technical problems. 82% Latency 89% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found it capable of handling real-time monitoring and recording without noticeable delays, which was crucial for professional audio work. 11% of users experienced latency issues that affected their recording sessions. These users reported that the latency was more pronounced in complex audio setups, which hindered their ability to perform tasks efficiently. 89% Driver Stability 83% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The majority of users reported consistent performance with minimal crashes or connectivity issues, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions. 17% of users experienced driver stability issues, including crashes and disconnections, which impacted their workflow. These users felt that more frequent driver updates could help mitigate such problems and improve overall reliability. 83% Preamp Quality 91% of users were highly satisfied with the preamp quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted the clean and transparent sound the preamps provided, which allowed for accurate capture of vocals and instruments without coloration. 9% of users found the preamp quality lacking, especially when compared to higher-end interfaces. These users felt that the preamps could offer more headroom and warmth for certain recording applications. 91% Software Bundle 86% of users appreciated the software bundle included with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the DAW and plugin offerings to be a valuable addition that enhanced their recording and production capabilities right out of the box. 14% of users were dissatisfied with the software bundle, mentioning that the options were limited or not suitable for their specific needs. Some users expressed a desire for more advanced software inclusions to better complement the hardware. 86% Input/Output Options 84% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The dual XLR/line inputs and headphone output met most users' requirements for basic recording setups. 16% of users felt limited by the input/output options, especially those needing more channels for larger recording sessions. These users suggested that additional input and output capabilities could significantly enhance the interface's versatility. 84% Phantom Power 87% of users appreciated the inclusion of phantom power on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, enabling them to use condenser microphones effectively. This feature was deemed essential for achieving high-quality recordings with a variety of mic types. 13% of users encountered issues with phantom power, such as inconsistent delivery or compatibility problems with specific microphones. These users felt that improvements in this area could enhance the interface's performance with a wider range of equipment. 87% USB-C Connectivity 89% of users were pleased with the USB-C connectivity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Audio Interface, noting the faster data transfer and improved power efficiency. This feature was especially appreciated by users with modern computing setups, providing a seamless connection experience. 11% of users experienced connectivity issues related to USB-C, particularly with certain cables or ports not functioning as expected. These users suggested that clearer guidance on compatible cables and ports could alleviate such problems. 89% Overall Satisfaction 88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing it as a reliable and high-performance tool for their audio needs. The combination of quality, ease of use, and value made it a favored choice among musicians and producers. 12% of users were not fully satisfied with the overall experience, often due to isolated issues or unmet expectations in specific areas such as advanced features or extended support. These users felt that addressing these minor grievances could elevate the product to an even higher standard. 88% Recording Quality 91% of users were highly satisfied with the recording quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted its ability to capture detailed and accurate audio, making it suitable for various applications from podcasts to music production. 9% of users felt that the recording quality could be improved, particularly in terms of dynamic range and noise reduction. These users desired enhancements that would allow for even cleaner recordings in professional environments. 91% Monitor Control 86% of users appreciated the monitor control features of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, particularly the direct monitor switch and volume control. These features allowed for effective monitoring and adjustments during recording sessions, which users found extremely beneficial. 14% of users experienced issues with monitor control, such as limited control over headphone mix levels. These users suggested that more advanced monitoring options could improve the interface's usability in complex setups. 86% Updates and Support 80% of users were satisfied with the updates and support provided for the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the ongoing driver updates and support resources available, which helped maintain the interface's performance over time. 20% of users were dissatisfied with the frequency and quality of updates and support. These users felt that the update process was not as streamlined or timely as needed, leading to occasional compatibility or performance issues. 80% Product Longevity 87% of users were satisfied with the product longevity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, reporting that it remained functional and reliable over extended periods of use. This aspect contributed to users' confidence in their investment. 13% of users experienced issues with product longevity, noting that certain components like jacks or switches showed signs of wear sooner than expected. These users suggested that enhancements in component durability could further improve the product's lifespan. 87%	purchase value 85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the combination of high-quality audio output and affordable pricing, making it accessible for both amateur and professional audio enthusiasts. Users felt that the interface offered excellent performance without breaking the bank, which was especially appealing to those who were budget-conscious. 15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, citing that similar products with more features were available at a comparable price. Some users felt that the interface lacked advanced options that could have justified the price point, leading them to believe they were not getting the best value for their money. 85% quality of materials 90% of users were pleased with the quality of materials used in the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. Many commented on its robust build and high-quality components, which contributed to a perception of durability and reliability. Users appreciated the metal casing, which provided a sturdy feel and assured them of the product's longevity. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of materials, mentioning that the unit felt heavier and bulkier than expected. A few users experienced issues with the knobs and buttons, reporting that they felt loose or less responsive over time, which detracted from the overall quality perception. 90% ease of use 88% of users found the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface easy to use, highlighting its plug-and-play functionality and straightforward design. The interface was praised for its intuitive controls, which made it accessible to beginners and professionals alike, allowing users to focus more on their creative process rather than technical setup. 12% of users were not satisfied with the ease of use, mainly due to initial setup challenges. Some users encountered difficulties with driver installation and compatibility issues with certain operating systems, which required additional troubleshooting and technical knowledge. 88% sound quality 92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its ability to deliver clear and crisp audio, which significantly enhanced their recording and playback experiences. Users noted that the preamps were quiet and offered a professional-grade sound that exceeded their expectations. 8% of users were disappointed with the sound quality, pointing out occasional noise interference and less than optimal performance when compared to higher-end models. A few users experienced problems with signal stability, which affected the overall audio output during critical recording sessions. 92% compatibility 83% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface with various devices and operating systems. They appreciated that it worked seamlessly with most popular DAWs and platforms, allowing them to integrate it easily into their existing setups without significant adjustments. 17% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with older operating systems and less common DAWs. Some users reported that the interface required specific drivers that were not readily available or resulted in latency problems, which hampered their recording sessions. 83% design 87% of users were satisfied with the design of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated its sleek and modern appearance, as well as the compact size which made it portable and easy to incorporate into any workspace. The minimalist design was also noted as a positive aspect, providing an aesthetically pleasing addition to their audio gear. 13% of users were dissatisfied with the design, noting that the interface's compactness sometimes made it feel cramped, especially when connecting multiple devices. A few users expressed a preference for more visible labeling on the controls and connections, which could have improved usability in low-light environments. 87% durability 89% of users expressed satisfaction with the durability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They were impressed by its robust construction, which they felt could withstand regular use and transport without easily succumbing to wear and tear. The metal casing was specifically mentioned as a factor that contributed to its perceived durability. 11% of users were not satisfied with the durability, reporting issues like premature wear on the knobs and switches. Some users experienced loose connections after extended use, which undermined their confidence in the product's long-term reliability. 89% portability 86% of users were satisfied with the portability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated its lightweight design and compact form factor, which made it easy to transport and ideal for on-the-go recording sessions. The interface was often praised for fitting comfortably into backpacks and small carry cases. 14% of users were dissatisfied with the portability, citing that the interface, while compact, required additional cables and adapters for certain setups, which added to the bulk. Some users found it inconvenient to constantly disconnect and reconnect the device when moving between locations. 86% latency 84% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found that it provided smooth and responsive audio processing, which was crucial for live monitoring and recording applications. Many users highlighted its real-time performance as a key benefit. 16% of users experienced dissatisfaction with latency issues, particularly when using the interface with certain DAWs or plugins. Some users noted occasional delays that affected the synchronization of audio tracks, which was problematic for time-sensitive recordings. 84% driver stability 82% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They reported a reliable connection and consistent performance across various sessions, which minimized interruptions and technical difficulties during critical tasks. 18% of users were dissatisfied with driver stability, encountering frequent disconnections and crashes. Some users struggled with maintaining a stable connection, especially during extended recording sessions, which affected their workflow and productivity. 82% customer support 81% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by RODE for the AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the prompt and helpful responses from support staff, which resolved their queries effectively and enhanced their overall experience with the product. 19% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, reporting delays in response times and a lack of comprehensive solutions to their problems. Some users felt that the support team lacked technical knowledge, which left their issues unresolved. 81% software integration 80% of users were satisfied with the software integration capabilities of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found it compatible with a wide range of DAWs and appreciated the seamless integration with most audio editing software, which facilitated a smooth workflow. 20% of users were dissatisfied with software integration, citing challenges in setting up the interface with specific DAWs. Some users experienced difficulties in configuring settings to achieve optimal performance, which was frustrating and time-consuming. 80% innovation 78% of users appreciated the innovative features of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, particularly its USB-C connectivity and compact design. They felt that these features represented a forward-thinking approach to audio interface design, catering to modern user needs. 22% of users were dissatisfied with the innovation aspect, feeling that the interface lacked groundbreaking features or advanced functionalities that could set it apart from competitors. Some users expected more cutting-edge technology or additional inputs/outputs to enhance versatility. 78% input/output options 75% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the single XLR input sufficient for their basic recording needs and appreciated the simplicity of the interface's design. 25% of users were dissatisfied with the limited input/output options, expressing a desire for more flexibility, such as additional inputs or a MIDI connection. Users who required more complex setups felt restricted by the interface's minimal connectivity options. 75% aesthetic appeal 88% of users were satisfied with the aesthetic appeal of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its sleek and minimalist design, which complemented their existing audio gear and added a touch of sophistication to their setups. 12% of users were not impressed with the aesthetic appeal, describing it as too plain and lacking distinctive features. Some users felt that a more visually striking design could enhance the product's appeal and make it stand out in a crowded market. 88% versatility 77% of users were satisfied with the versatility of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, finding it adaptable to various recording environments and applications. They appreciated its ability to handle different audio tasks effectively, from podcasting to music production. 23% of users were dissatisfied with the versatility, noting that the interface was limited in terms of expandability and connectivity. Users seeking a more comprehensive solution for diverse audio needs felt that the interface's options were too constrained. 77% mic preamp quality 91% of users were satisfied with the mic preamp quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised the clarity and low noise performance, which enhanced the quality of their recordings and exceeded their expectations for an interface in this price range. 9% of users were dissatisfied with the mic preamp quality, reporting occasional noise and signal issues. Some felt that the preamp lacked the warmth and richness found in higher-end models, which affected the overall sound quality. 91% headphone output quality 89% of users were satisfied with the headphone output quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the output to be powerful and clear, allowing for accurate monitoring and mixing during recording sessions. 11% of users were dissatisfied with the headphone output quality, mentioning a lack of volume and clarity with certain headphones. Some users experienced distortion at higher volumes, which impacted their ability to monitor audio effectively. 89% USB-C connectivity 90% of users appreciated the USB-C connectivity of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, which provided fast data transfer and a stable connection. Users noted that it was a significant improvement over older USB standards, enhancing their overall experience. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the USB-C connectivity, mainly due to compatibility issues with older devices or the need for additional adapters. Some users found it inconvenient to upgrade their existing setups to accommodate the new standard. 90% build quality 93% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its sturdy construction and premium materials, which gave them confidence in the product's durability and long-term use. 7% of users expressed concerns about the build quality, reporting minor defects or inconsistencies in the finish. Some users experienced issues with the durability of certain components, such as the knobs and switches, which affected their overall satisfaction. 93% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the balance between affordability and functionality, making it an excellent choice for both beginners and professionals. Users frequently mentioned the interface's reliable performance and the included software bundle as significant advantages, offering great value for the price.

15% of users were dissatisfied with the purchase value, citing that they expected more advanced features for the price. Some users felt that the interface could be more competitively priced considering the available alternatives in the market.

85%
Quality of Materials

90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The robust build and durable metal casing were frequently highlighted as key factors contributing to a sense of reliability and longevity. Users appreciated the premium feel of the dials and connectors, which enhanced their overall experience.

10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of materials, noting that some components felt slightly less durable over time. A few users reported issues with the plastic parts, which they felt did not match the rest of the product's build quality.

90%
Ease of Use

88% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface easy to use. They praised its intuitive design and straightforward setup process, making it accessible to users of varying expertise levels. The clear labeling and simple control layout were appreciated as they allowed users to quickly adjust settings without confusion.

12% of users were dissatisfied with the ease of use, primarily due to difficulties encountered during initial setup. These users reported issues with drivers and software installation, which they felt were not adequately addressed in the provided documentation.

88%
Sound Quality

92% of users were impressed with the sound quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, noting its clear and crisp audio output as a standout feature. Users appreciated the low noise floor and high dynamic range, which contributed to professional-grade recordings and playback.

8% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, mentioning occasional latency issues and minor distortion at high volumes. Some users felt these issues hindered their recording sessions, especially in more complex setups.

92%
Compatibility

87% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing its seamless integration with various DAWs and operating systems as a major advantage. Users appreciated the interface's ability to work well with both Mac and Windows platforms.

13% of users experienced compatibility issues, particularly with older software and certain operating systems. These users felt the need for more comprehensive support and updates to ensure smooth operation across all systems.

87%
Portability

85% of users praised the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, highlighting its compact size and lightweight design. This made it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions or gigs, which was a significant plus for users frequently on the move.

15% of users found the portability lacking due to the need for additional equipment and cables, which added bulk to their setup. Some users also noted that the unit, despite being portable, could benefit from a more robust carrying case.

85%
Durability

88% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often commenting on its sturdy construction. Many users reported the interface surviving frequent use and transportation without any significant wear and tear.

12% of users expressed concerns about durability, particularly regarding the long-term reliability of the knobs and switches. Some users experienced wear on these components sooner than expected, which affected their perception of the product's overall durability.

88%
Aesthetics

90% of users were pleased with the aesthetics of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often mentioning its sleek and modern design. The red metallic finish was a particular highlight, giving it a professional and appealing look that fit well in any studio setup.

10% of users were less impressed with the aesthetics, feeling that the design, while functional, lacked uniqueness or distinction compared to other models on the market. Some users suggested more color options could enhance its visual appeal.

90%
Customer Support

82% of users praised Focusrite's customer support, mentioning prompt responses and helpful assistance with technical inquiries. Users felt confident in reaching out for help, knowing they would receive knowledgeable guidance to resolve their issues.

18% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses and unhelpful troubleshooting advice. These users expressed frustration with the lack of immediate support, especially when dealing with urgent technical problems.

82%
Latency

89% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found it capable of handling real-time monitoring and recording without noticeable delays, which was crucial for professional audio work.

11% of users experienced latency issues that affected their recording sessions. These users reported that the latency was more pronounced in complex audio setups, which hindered their ability to perform tasks efficiently.

89%
Driver Stability

83% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The majority of users reported consistent performance with minimal crashes or connectivity issues, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions.

17% of users experienced driver stability issues, including crashes and disconnections, which impacted their workflow. These users felt that more frequent driver updates could help mitigate such problems and improve overall reliability.

83%
Preamp Quality

91% of users were highly satisfied with the preamp quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted the clean and transparent sound the preamps provided, which allowed for accurate capture of vocals and instruments without coloration.

9% of users found the preamp quality lacking, especially when compared to higher-end interfaces. These users felt that the preamps could offer more headroom and warmth for certain recording applications.

91%
Software Bundle

86% of users appreciated the software bundle included with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the DAW and plugin offerings to be a valuable addition that enhanced their recording and production capabilities right out of the box.

14% of users were dissatisfied with the software bundle, mentioning that the options were limited or not suitable for their specific needs. Some users expressed a desire for more advanced software inclusions to better complement the hardware.

86%
Input/Output Options

84% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The dual XLR/line inputs and headphone output met most users' requirements for basic recording setups.

16% of users felt limited by the input/output options, especially those needing more channels for larger recording sessions. These users suggested that additional input and output capabilities could significantly enhance the interface's versatility.

84%
Phantom Power

87% of users appreciated the inclusion of phantom power on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, enabling them to use condenser microphones effectively. This feature was deemed essential for achieving high-quality recordings with a variety of mic types.

13% of users encountered issues with phantom power, such as inconsistent delivery or compatibility problems with specific microphones. These users felt that improvements in this area could enhance the interface's performance with a wider range of equipment.

87%
USB-C Connectivity

89% of users were pleased with the USB-C connectivity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Audio Interface, noting the faster data transfer and improved power efficiency. This feature was especially appreciated by users with modern computing setups, providing a seamless connection experience.

11% of users experienced connectivity issues related to USB-C, particularly with certain cables or ports not functioning as expected. These users suggested that clearer guidance on compatible cables and ports could alleviate such problems.

89%
Overall Satisfaction

88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing it as a reliable and high-performance tool for their audio needs. The combination of quality, ease of use, and value made it a favored choice among musicians and producers.

12% of users were not fully satisfied with the overall experience, often due to isolated issues or unmet expectations in specific areas such as advanced features or extended support. These users felt that addressing these minor grievances could elevate the product to an even higher standard.

88%
Recording Quality

91% of users were highly satisfied with the recording quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted its ability to capture detailed and accurate audio, making it suitable for various applications from podcasts to music production.

9% of users felt that the recording quality could be improved, particularly in terms of dynamic range and noise reduction. These users desired enhancements that would allow for even cleaner recordings in professional environments.

91%
Monitor Control

86% of users appreciated the monitor control features of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, particularly the direct monitor switch and volume control. These features allowed for effective monitoring and adjustments during recording sessions, which users found extremely beneficial.

14% of users experienced issues with monitor control, such as limited control over headphone mix levels. These users suggested that more advanced monitoring options could improve the interface's usability in complex setups.

86%
Updates and Support

80% of users were satisfied with the updates and support provided for the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the ongoing driver updates and support resources available, which helped maintain the interface's performance over time.

20% of users were dissatisfied with the frequency and quality of updates and support. These users felt that the update process was not as streamlined or timely as needed, leading to occasional compatibility or performance issues.

80%
Product Longevity

87% of users were satisfied with the product longevity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, reporting that it remained functional and reliable over extended periods of use. This aspect contributed to users' confidence in their investment.

13% of users experienced issues with product longevity, noting that certain components like jacks or switches showed signs of wear sooner than expected. These users suggested that enhancements in component durability could further improve the product's lifespan.

87%

purchase value

85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the combination of high-quality audio output and affordable pricing, making it accessible for both amateur and professional audio enthusiasts. Users felt that the interface offered excellent performance without breaking the bank, which was especially appealing to those who were budget-conscious.

15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, citing that similar products with more features were available at a comparable price. Some users felt that the interface lacked advanced options that could have justified the price point, leading them to believe they were not getting the best value for their money.

85%
quality of materials

90% of users were pleased with the quality of materials used in the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. Many commented on its robust build and high-quality components, which contributed to a perception of durability and reliability. Users appreciated the metal casing, which provided a sturdy feel and assured them of the product's longevity.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of materials, mentioning that the unit felt heavier and bulkier than expected. A few users experienced issues with the knobs and buttons, reporting that they felt loose or less responsive over time, which detracted from the overall quality perception.

90%
ease of use

88% of users found the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface easy to use, highlighting its plug-and-play functionality and straightforward design. The interface was praised for its intuitive controls, which made it accessible to beginners and professionals alike, allowing users to focus more on their creative process rather than technical setup.

12% of users were not satisfied with the ease of use, mainly due to initial setup challenges. Some users encountered difficulties with driver installation and compatibility issues with certain operating systems, which required additional troubleshooting and technical knowledge.

88%
sound quality

92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its ability to deliver clear and crisp audio, which significantly enhanced their recording and playback experiences. Users noted that the preamps were quiet and offered a professional-grade sound that exceeded their expectations.

8% of users were disappointed with the sound quality, pointing out occasional noise interference and less than optimal performance when compared to higher-end models. A few users experienced problems with signal stability, which affected the overall audio output during critical recording sessions.

92%
compatibility

83% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface with various devices and operating systems. They appreciated that it worked seamlessly with most popular DAWs and platforms, allowing them to integrate it easily into their existing setups without significant adjustments.

17% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with older operating systems and less common DAWs. Some users reported that the interface required specific drivers that were not readily available or resulted in latency problems, which hampered their recording sessions.

83%
design

87% of users were satisfied with the design of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated its sleek and modern appearance, as well as the compact size which made it portable and easy to incorporate into any workspace. The minimalist design was also noted as a positive aspect, providing an aesthetically pleasing addition to their audio gear.

13% of users were dissatisfied with the design, noting that the interface's compactness sometimes made it feel cramped, especially when connecting multiple devices. A few users expressed a preference for more visible labeling on the controls and connections, which could have improved usability in low-light environments.

87%
durability

89% of users expressed satisfaction with the durability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They were impressed by its robust construction, which they felt could withstand regular use and transport without easily succumbing to wear and tear. The metal casing was specifically mentioned as a factor that contributed to its perceived durability.

11% of users were not satisfied with the durability, reporting issues like premature wear on the knobs and switches. Some users experienced loose connections after extended use, which undermined their confidence in the product's long-term reliability.

89%
portability

86% of users were satisfied with the portability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated its lightweight design and compact form factor, which made it easy to transport and ideal for on-the-go recording sessions. The interface was often praised for fitting comfortably into backpacks and small carry cases.

14% of users were dissatisfied with the portability, citing that the interface, while compact, required additional cables and adapters for certain setups, which added to the bulk. Some users found it inconvenient to constantly disconnect and reconnect the device when moving between locations.

86%
latency

84% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found that it provided smooth and responsive audio processing, which was crucial for live monitoring and recording applications. Many users highlighted its real-time performance as a key benefit.

16% of users experienced dissatisfaction with latency issues, particularly when using the interface with certain DAWs or plugins. Some users noted occasional delays that affected the synchronization of audio tracks, which was problematic for time-sensitive recordings.

84%
driver stability

82% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They reported a reliable connection and consistent performance across various sessions, which minimized interruptions and technical difficulties during critical tasks.

18% of users were dissatisfied with driver stability, encountering frequent disconnections and crashes. Some users struggled with maintaining a stable connection, especially during extended recording sessions, which affected their workflow and productivity.

82%
customer support

81% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by RODE for the AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the prompt and helpful responses from support staff, which resolved their queries effectively and enhanced their overall experience with the product.

19% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, reporting delays in response times and a lack of comprehensive solutions to their problems. Some users felt that the support team lacked technical knowledge, which left their issues unresolved.

81%
software integration

80% of users were satisfied with the software integration capabilities of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found it compatible with a wide range of DAWs and appreciated the seamless integration with most audio editing software, which facilitated a smooth workflow.

20% of users were dissatisfied with software integration, citing challenges in setting up the interface with specific DAWs. Some users experienced difficulties in configuring settings to achieve optimal performance, which was frustrating and time-consuming.

80%
innovation

78% of users appreciated the innovative features of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, particularly its USB-C connectivity and compact design. They felt that these features represented a forward-thinking approach to audio interface design, catering to modern user needs.

22% of users were dissatisfied with the innovation aspect, feeling that the interface lacked groundbreaking features or advanced functionalities that could set it apart from competitors. Some users expected more cutting-edge technology or additional inputs/outputs to enhance versatility.

78%
input/output options

75% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the single XLR input sufficient for their basic recording needs and appreciated the simplicity of the interface's design.

25% of users were dissatisfied with the limited input/output options, expressing a desire for more flexibility, such as additional inputs or a MIDI connection. Users who required more complex setups felt restricted by the interface's minimal connectivity options.

75%
aesthetic appeal

88% of users were satisfied with the aesthetic appeal of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its sleek and minimalist design, which complemented their existing audio gear and added a touch of sophistication to their setups.

12% of users were not impressed with the aesthetic appeal, describing it as too plain and lacking distinctive features. Some users felt that a more visually striking design could enhance the product's appeal and make it stand out in a crowded market.

88%
versatility

77% of users were satisfied with the versatility of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, finding it adaptable to various recording environments and applications. They appreciated its ability to handle different audio tasks effectively, from podcasting to music production.

23% of users were dissatisfied with the versatility, noting that the interface was limited in terms of expandability and connectivity. Users seeking a more comprehensive solution for diverse audio needs felt that the interface's options were too constrained.

77%
mic preamp quality

91% of users were satisfied with the mic preamp quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised the clarity and low noise performance, which enhanced the quality of their recordings and exceeded their expectations for an interface in this price range.

9% of users were dissatisfied with the mic preamp quality, reporting occasional noise and signal issues. Some felt that the preamp lacked the warmth and richness found in higher-end models, which affected the overall sound quality.

91%
headphone output quality

89% of users were satisfied with the headphone output quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the output to be powerful and clear, allowing for accurate monitoring and mixing during recording sessions.

11% of users were dissatisfied with the headphone output quality, mentioning a lack of volume and clarity with certain headphones. Some users experienced distortion at higher volumes, which impacted their ability to monitor audio effectively.

89%
USB-C connectivity

90% of users appreciated the USB-C connectivity of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, which provided fast data transfer and a stable connection. Users noted that it was a significant improvement over older USB standards, enhancing their overall experience.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the USB-C connectivity, mainly due to compatibility issues with older devices or the need for additional adapters. Some users found it inconvenient to upgrade their existing setups to accommodate the new standard.

90%
build quality

93% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its sturdy construction and premium materials, which gave them confidence in the product's durability and long-term use.

7% of users expressed concerns about the build quality, reporting minor defects or inconsistencies in the finish. Some users experienced issues with the durability of certain components, such as the knobs and switches, which affected their overall satisfaction.

93%

Pros:
High-quality preamps for clear audio capture. USB-C connectivity for faster data transfer and compatibility. Compact and portable design. Low latency monitoring. Easy setup and user-friendly interface.	High-quality preamps and audio conversion. Rugged and compact design. Easy setup and operation with plug-and-play functionality. Compatible with both Mac and Windows. Includes balanced outputs for studio monitors.

Cons:
Limited to two inputs, which may not be enough for some users. No MIDI input/output. Higher price point compared to some competitors. Requires external power when used with some devices.	Limited to a single input channel, which may not be suitable for multi-input recording needs. No midi input/output. Pricier compared to some other single-input interfaces. Lacks onboard controls for gain and monitoring.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz	1 Input / 2 Output
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	96 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2	1
Analog Audio I/O
2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)	1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Mic/Line Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output
Digital Audio I/O

Host Connection
1x USB-C	USB-C
OS Compatibility
macOS Windows	macOS 10.10 or Later Windows 7 or Later
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)	USB Bus Power

When comparing the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, several key differences and similarities emerge in terms of their features.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers more extensive input and output options with its 2-input/2-output configuration at 192 kHz. It includes 2 XLR 3-pin balanced mic inputs, 2 1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced line/Hi-Z inputs on the front panel, and 2 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs. Additionally, it has a 1/4" TRS headphone output on the front panel. This setup is ideal for users needing multiple input options for microphones and instruments. The Scarlett 2i2’s maximum sampling rate is 192 kHz at 24-bit, which provides high-quality audio resolution. It is compatible with both macOS and Windows operating systems and can be powered via USB bus power or an optional USB power adapter.
On the other hand, the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface is simpler in terms of input/output channels, with a 1-input/2-output configuration at 96 kHz. It features a single combo XLR-1/4" TRS mic/line input, 2 1/4" TRS balanced line outputs, and a 1/4" TRS headphone output. The maximum sampling rate of the AI-1 is 96 kHz at 24-bit, which is sufficient for high-quality audio recording but not as high as the Scarlett 2i2. The RODE AI-1 is also compatible with both macOS (version 10.10 or later) and Windows (version 7 or later) operating systems, and it operates solely on USB bus power.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) provides a more versatile and higher-resolution recording setup with additional input options and a higher maximum sampling rate. It is suitable for users who need more flexibility and higher audio quality. The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, while more basic in comparison, still offers solid performance with its simpler configuration, making it a good choice for users who need a straightforward and reliable audio interface for basic recording tasks.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz	1 Input / 2 Output
Built-In DSP

Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	96 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2	1
Built-In Microphone

Input Level Adjustment
2x Knob	2x Knob
Expansion Slots

When comparing the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, several key features stand out that differentiate these two products.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers 2 analog inputs and 2 analog outputs at a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz and 24-bit resolution. This makes it capable of handling high-fidelity audio recording and playback. It includes 2 microphone inputs, which are ideal for users who need to record using multiple mics simultaneously. The device does not have built-in DSP or a built-in microphone, but it provides input level adjustment through 2 dedicated knobs. There are no expansion slots available on this audio interface, making it a straightforward, plug-and-play solution.
On the other hand, the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface features 1 input and 2 outputs, with a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz and 24-bit resolution. This unit is designed with 1 microphone input, catering to solo recording needs. Similar to the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2, the RODE AI-1 lacks built-in DSP and a built-in microphone. It also offers input level adjustment through 2 knobs and does not include expansion slots.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 stands out with its higher number of input channels and a higher maximum sampling rate, making it more versatile for multi-microphone setups and high-resolution audio tasks. The RODE AI-1, while more limited in input capacity and sampling rate, remains a solid choice for simpler recording needs, particularly for solo artists or podcasters. Both devices share common features like input level adjustment through knobs and the absence of built-in DSP and expansion slots.

Signal Processing
Gain/Trim Range
Mic/Line Inputs: Up to +69 dB Hi-Z Inputs: 62 dB	Inputs: 0 to 45 dB

When comparing the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, one of the key differences lies in their gain/trim range. The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers a more extensive gain/trim range, with mic/line inputs providing up to +69 dB and Hi-Z inputs offering up to 62 dB. This extensive range provides greater flexibility for users who need to accommodate a variety of input levels, making it particularly suitable for both professional and home studio environments.
In contrast, the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface has a gain/trim range for its inputs running from 0 to 45 dB. While this range is sufficient for many applications, it does not offer the same level of flexibility as the Scarlett 2i2. This could be a limiting factor for users who require higher gain levels for certain microphones or instruments.
Another notable difference is the inclusion of additional features in the Scarlett 2i2. For instance, the RODE AI-1 lacks a high-pass filter and solo/mute functionality, which can be useful for managing and refining the audio input during recording sessions. The absence of these features in the AI-1 may make it less suitable for users who need more nuanced control over their audio inputs.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) offers a more extensive gain/trim range and additional features that provide greater control and flexibility, making it a more versatile choice for a wide range of recording needs. The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, while competent, offers a more limited gain/trim range and lacks some of the additional features found in the Scarlett 2i2, which may make it less ideal for users with more demanding audio requirements.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)	1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Mic/Line Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output
Phantom Power
48 V, Selectable On/Off	48 V
Digital Audio I/O

Host Connection
1x USB-C	USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0	Not Specified by Manufacturer
USB (Non-Host)
1x USB-C (Power Input)
Sync I/O

Network I/O

MIDI I/O

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface are both highly regarded for their audio quality and ease of use, but they offer different features that may appeal to different users based on their specific needs.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) offers more extensive analog audio I/O options compared to the RODE AI-1. It features 2x XLR 3-Pin balanced mic inputs and 2x 1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced line/Hi-Z inputs on the front panel, making it versatile for both microphone and instrument inputs. Additionally, it has 2x 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs and 1x 1/4" TRS headphone output on the front panel, which provides flexible monitoring options. The Scarlett 2i2 also includes selectable 48V phantom power, which is essential for powering condenser microphones. The interface connects to the host via 1x USB-C using the USB 2.0 protocol and also has an additional USB-C port for power input. However, it lacks digital audio I/O, MIDI I/O, network I/O, and wireless features.
In contrast, the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface is more simplified but still effective for basic recording needs. It has 1x combo XLR-1/4" TRS mic/line input, which supports both microphone and line-level signals, and 2x 1/4" TRS balanced line outputs for connecting to studio monitors. Like the Scarlett 2i2, it also includes 1x 1/4" TRS headphone output for monitoring and provides 48V phantom power for condenser microphones. The host connection is via USB-C, but the specific protocol is not specified by the manufacturer. The RODE AI-1 does not include additional USB ports, digital audio I/O, MIDI I/O, network I/O, or wireless capabilities.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) offers greater flexibility with more input options and an additional USB-C port for power, making it suitable for users who need to connect multiple devices simultaneously. The RODE AI-1, on the other hand, provides a more straightforward setup with essential features that cater to users looking for a simpler, more streamlined interface.

Performance
Frequency Response
XLR Mic Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB 1/4" Line Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.05 dB 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.15 dB	20 Hz to 20 kHz ±1 dB
Maximum Output Level
1/4" Line: +16 dBu	Monitor Outputs: -6 dBu
Headphone Output Power
1/4": 32 mW into 33 Ohms 22 mW into 300 Ohms	24 mW into 32 Ohms 245 mW into 300 Ohms
Impedance
XLR Mic Inputs: 3 Kilohms 1/4" Line Inputs: 60 Kilohms 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohms 1/4" Line Outputs: 100 Ohms 1/4" Headphone Outputs: < 50 Ohm	Hi-Z Inputs: 0.9 Megohm Mic Inputs: 1.3 Kilohms
Dynamic Range
XLR Mic Inputs: 116 dBA 1/4" Line Inputs: 115.2 dBA 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 113 dBA 1/4" Line Outputs: 120 dB 1/4" Headphone: 112 dB (at 33 Ohms) 115 dB (at 300 Ohms) Digital A/D Converters: 120 dB Digital D/A Converters: 130 dBA	104 dBu
EIN
XLR Mic Inputs: -127 dBu A-Weighted	-128 dBA

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface present notable differences in their specifications, catering to distinct audio interface needs.
Starting with frequency response, the Scarlett 2i2 offers impressive precision across its inputs, with XLR mic inputs delivering a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB, 1/4" line inputs at 20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.05 dB, and 1/4" Hi-Z inputs at 20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.15 dB. In comparison, the RODE AI-1 provides a more general frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±1 dB, which is adequate but not as finely calibrated as the Scarlett 2i2.
In terms of maximum input levels, the Scarlett 2i2 also outperforms with XLR mic inputs handling up to 16 dBu, 1/4" line inputs up to 22 dBu, and 1/4" Hi-Z inputs up to 12 dBu. The RODE AI-1 does not specify maximum input levels, focusing instead on maximum output level for monitor outputs at -6 dBu, which is lower than the Scarlett's maximum output level of +16 dBu for 1/4" line outputs.
For headphone output power, the Scarlett 2i2 delivers 32 mW into 33 Ohms and 22 mW into 300 Ohms. The RODE AI-1, however, provides significantly higher power at 24 mW into 32 Ohms and 245 mW into 300 Ohms, making it potentially more suitable for high-impedance headphones.
When it comes to impedance, the Scarlett 2i2 displays diversified values: XLR mic inputs at 3 Kilohms, 1/4" line inputs at 60 Kilohms, 1/4" Hi-Z inputs at 1 Megohm, and 1/4" line outputs at 100 Ohms, with headphone outputs at <50 Ohms. The RODE AI-1 features Hi-Z inputs at 0.9 Megohms and mic inputs at 1.3 Kilohms, which are generally lower than the Scarlett's corresponding inputs.
The dynamic range is another area where the Scarlett 2i2 excels, offering 116 dBA for XLR mic inputs, 115.2 dBA for 1/4" line inputs, 113 dBA for 1/4" Hi-Z inputs, and 120 dB for 1/4" line outputs. Its headphone dynamic range is 112 dB at 33 Ohms and 115 dB at 300 Ohms, with digital A/D converters at 120 dB and D/A converters at 130 dBA. The RODE AI-1's dynamic range is more modest at 104 dBu.
In terms of Total Harmonic Distortion plus Noise (THD+N), the Scarlett 2i2 is quite low, with XLR mic inputs and 1/4" line inputs both at -100 dB at 8 dB gain, and 1/4" Hi-Z inputs at -80 dB at minimum gain. Its 1/4" line outputs are at -109 dB, and headphone outputs vary between -99 dB at 33 Ohms and -108 dB at 300 Ohms. The Scarlett's digital A/D converters feature -110 dB while the D/A converters are at -115 dB. The RODE AI-1, however, does not specify THD+N values.
Lastly, Equivalent Input Noise (EIN) sees the Scarlett 2i2 at a competitive -127 dBu A-Weighted, while the RODE AI-1 slightly edges it out at -128 dBA.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) offers more detailed and precise specifications, with higher maximum input/output levels, a broader dynamic range, and lower THD+N values, making it a robust choice for professional audio recording and production. The RODE AI-1, while still a capable interface, may appeal more to users needing higher headphone output power and simpler specifications.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 / 176.4 / 192 kHz	44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 kHz
Bit Depths
24-Bit	24-Bit

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface are both robust options for audio recording and production, but they differ in several key features.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers a wider range of sample rates, supporting 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, 176.4, and 192 kHz. This extensive range allows for greater flexibility in recording and producing high-resolution audio. It operates at a 24-bit depth, ensuring a high level of detail and dynamic range in audio capture. The Scarlett 2i2 uses an internal sync source for clocking, which helps maintain audio fidelity and timing accuracy.
On the other hand, the RODE AI-1 supports sample rates of 44.1, 48, 88.2, and 96 kHz, which, although slightly limited compared to the Scarlett 2i2, still covers the most commonly used rates in professional and home studios. It also records at a 24-bit depth, providing comparable audio quality to the Scarlett 2i2. Additionally, the AI-1 features zero-latency direct monitoring, which is crucial for real-time audio monitoring without delay, enhancing the recording experience. Like the Scarlett 2i2, it uses an internal clocking source.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers a broader range of sample rates, which might be beneficial for more detailed audio work, while the RODE AI-1 provides zero-latency direct monitoring, which can be a significant advantage for live recording sessions. Both interfaces offer high-quality 24-bit audio resolution and use internal clocking to ensure audio precision.

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS Windows	macOS 10.10 or Later Windows 7 or Later

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface are both high-quality options for audio recording and production, but they differ in terms of OS compatibility and mobile app support.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) is compatible with both macOS and Windows operating systems. It also offers mobile app compatibility, specifically with iPadOS, allowing for greater flexibility and portability in various recording environments. This feature is particularly advantageous for users who want to integrate their iPad into their recording setup for on-the-go production and mixing.
On the other hand, the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface supports macOS 10.10 or later and Windows 7 or later. While it covers a broad range of operating systems, it does not offer compatibility with mobile apps or iPadOS. This limits its use to more traditional desktop and laptop setups, which may be a consideration for those looking to incorporate mobile devices into their workflow.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) provides broader OS compatibility and the added benefit of iPadOS support, making it a versatile choice for users who appreciate mobile integration. The RODE AI-1, while offering strong compatibility with both macOS and Windows, lacks mobile app support, which may be a limitation for some users.

Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)	USB Bus Power

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface both offer USB bus power capabilities, making them convenient for mobile recording setups and minimizing the need for additional power sources. However, there are notable differences in their power requirements and options.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 can be powered via USB Bus Power or an optional USB Power Adapter, providing flexibility for different recording scenarios. It also supports an AC/DC Power Adapter with a specification of 5 VDC at 900 mA, ensuring stable operation in more demanding environments. The power consumption of the Scarlett 2i2 is relatively low at 4.5 W, making it efficient in terms of energy use.
In contrast, the RODE AI-1 is solely reliant on USB Bus Power for its operation. This simplifies its connectivity and setup, especially for users who prefer fewer cables and accessories. The absence of an option for an external power adapter could be seen as a limitation for those who require more versatile power options or additional stability in power supply.
In summary, while both audio interfaces can be powered through USB Bus Power, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers additional flexibility with the option for an external USB Power Adapter and an AC/DC Power Adapter. This makes it potentially more versatile and reliable in a wider range of recording environments compared to the RODE AI-1, which exclusively relies on USB Bus Power.

Physical
Dimensions
7.1 x 4.6 x 1.87" / 18 x 11.7 x 4.75 cm	4.9 x 3.9 x 1.5" / 124 x 100 x 38 mm
Weight
1.3 lb / 595.0 g	19.8 oz / 561.3 g

When comparing the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface in terms of dimensions and weight, distinct differences emerge between the two products.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) measures 7.1 x 4.6 x 1.87 inches (18 x 11.7 x 4.75 cm) and weighs 1.3 lbs (595 grams). This makes it relatively compact and lightweight, suitable for both stationary use in a home studio and mobile recording setups.
On the other hand, the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface is more compact with dimensions of 4.9 x 3.9 x 1.5 inches (124 x 100 x 38 mm) and weighs 19.8 oz (561.3 grams). Despite being slightly lighter than the Scarlett 2i2, the AI-1's smaller form factor makes it an even more portable option, ideal for musicians and podcasters who need a highly portable interface solution without sacrificing performance.
In summary, both audio interfaces offer portable and lightweight designs, but the RODE AI-1 is slightly more compact and lighter compared to the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation), which could be a deciding factor for users prioritizing portability.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
1.9 lb	1.155 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
8.2 x 7 x 2.6"	7 x 5.1 x 2.55"

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface present distinct features in terms of packaging weight and box dimensions.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) has a package weight of 1.9 pounds, making it relatively heavier compared to the RODE AI-1, which weighs 1.155 pounds. This suggests that the Scarlett 2i2 might have a more robust build or include additional materials in the packaging.
In terms of box dimensions, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 measures 8.2 x 7 x 2.6 inches, whereas the RODE AI-1 has slightly more compact dimensions at 7 x 5.1 x 2.55 inches. The difference in size indicates that the Scarlett 2i2's packaging is larger, possibly accommodating more components or providing additional protection during transit.
Overall, while both audio interfaces are geared towards high-quality audio capture and USB-C connectivity, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) is heavier and comes in a larger box compared to the more compact and lighter RODE AI-1.