Universal Audio Volt 1 vs. Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen): A Comprehensive Comparison

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Universal Audio Volt 1 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface are two popular choices for musicians, podcasters, and home studio enthusiasts. Each boasts unique features catering to different needs and preferences.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) is renowned for its simplicity and high-quality audio performance. It features a single XLR input with Focusrite's acclaimed mic preamps, delivering clear and transparent recordings. The 4th Generation model includes an upgraded Air mode, which adds brightness and presence to vocals and acoustic instruments. With a robust metal chassis, the Scarlett Solo is built to withstand the rigors of mobile recording. It supports sample rates up to 192kHz, ensuring professional-grade audio fidelity. The USB-C connectivity ensures fast, reliable data transfer, and the interface is bundled with a comprehensive software suite, including Ableton Live Lite, Pro Tools First, and Focusrite's own plugin collection.
On the other hand, the Universal Audio Volt 1 stands out with its vintage-inspired analog sound. It features a single XLR input equipped with a Vintage Mic Preamp mode, emulating the rich, warm tones of Universal Audio's classic 610 tube preamp. This makes it particularly appealing for users seeking a distinctive, characterful sound. The Volt 1 also includes a 1/4" Hi-Z input for direct instrument recording and MIDI I/O for connecting external MIDI gear. Like the Scarlett Solo, it supports 24-bit/192kHz audio resolution and uses USB-C for connectivity. The Volt 1 comes with a software bundle that includes Ableton Live Lite, UJAM's Virtual Drummer, Marshall Plexi Classic Amp, and more, catering to a wide range of creative needs.
Both interfaces are compact and portable, making them ideal for on-the-go recording. However, the choice between them largely hinges on the user’s preference for sound character and additional features. The Scarlett Solo is perfect for those who prioritize clean, transparent recordings and a straightforward setup. In contrast, the Volt 1 is ideal for users who desire a vintage, warm sound with the added flexibility of MIDI connectivity. Both devices offer excellent value and high-quality performance, making them strong contenders in the entry-level audio interface market.

Specifications, Advantages, and Disadvantages of Universal Audio Volt 1 and Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen)

Universal Audio Volt 1

Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation)

Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation)

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 85% of users praised the Universal Audio Volt 1 Audio Interface as an excellent value for the money. They highlighted its affordability compared to other interfaces with similar features, noting that it provides high-quality sound and robust performance without breaking the bank. Many users appreciated the inclusion of features typically found in more expensive models, such as the vintage mic preamp mode, which enhances the warmth and richness of vocal recordings. 15% of users felt that the purchase value was not up to their expectations. Some users mentioned that they expected more features for the price, such as additional input/output options or digital displays. A few also noted that while the interface was reasonably priced, they encountered issues with software compatibility that detracted from their overall satisfaction. 85% Quality of Materials 90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They commended its sturdy build and premium feel, noting that the metal casing provides confidence in its durability and longevity. Many users appreciated the solid knobs and switches, which contribute to a professional and reliable user experience. 10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the materials used. Some reported that the knobs felt slightly loose or that the interface showed signs of wear and tear more quickly than expected. A few users also noted that the plastic components did not match the metal parts in terms of perceived quality. 90% Sound Quality 92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They frequently mentioned the clarity and depth of the audio recordings, praising the interface for its ability to capture subtle details in both vocal and instrumental recordings. Users were particularly impressed with the vintage preamp feature, which they felt added an authentic analog warmth to their recordings. 8% of users were not completely satisfied with the sound quality. Some users encountered issues with noise or hums, which they attributed to the interface's preamp. Others felt that while the sound quality was generally good, it did not live up to the high standards set by other Universal Audio products they had experienced. 92% Ease of Use 88% of users found the Volt 1 Audio Interface easy to use. They appreciated its straightforward setup process and intuitive controls, which allowed them to start recording quickly without needing to consult the manual extensively. The simplicity of the interface was often highlighted as a benefit, particularly by those who were new to audio recording. 12% of users reported some difficulties with ease of use. A few users struggled with the initial software installation, citing a lack of clear instructions. Others mentioned that the interface's minimalistic design sometimes led to confusion about certain functions, especially for users accustomed to more complex setups. 88% Software Compatibility 80% of users reported satisfaction with the software compatibility of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They appreciated its seamless integration with popular digital audio workstations (DAWs) such as Pro Tools and Ableton Live. Users also valued the included software bundle, which provided additional tools for enhancing their recordings. 20% of users experienced issues with software compatibility. Some users encountered difficulties getting the interface to work with their preferred DAW, particularly on Windows operating systems. Others reported problems with driver installations or noted that certain software features were not as robust as they had hoped. 80% Portability 87% of users were pleased with the portability of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They highlighted its compact size and lightweight design, which made it easy to transport and use in various locations. Musicians and podcasters who frequently travel appreciated the ability to maintain their recording quality on the go. 13% of users found portability to be a minor issue. Some users mentioned that while the interface was small, it required additional equipment, such as power supplies or cables, which reduced its overall portability. A few also noted that the device's size came at the expense of having fewer input/output options. 87% Durability 89% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They noted that the solid construction and choice of materials provided a robust device capable of withstanding frequent use and occasional travel-related bumps. Users felt confident that the interface could handle their recording needs over an extended period. 11% of users expressed concerns about durability. Some reported that after several months of use, the interface developed minor issues such as loose connections or scratchy knobs. A few users felt that while the initial build quality seemed strong, the long-term durability was less certain. 89% Design Aesthetics 93% of users were impressed with the design aesthetics of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They frequently commented on its sleek and modern look, noting that the interface added a professional appearance to their recording setup. The attention to design detail was a common point of praise, with many users appreciating the interface's stylish yet functional form. 7% of users were not fully satisfied with the design aesthetics. Some felt that the interface's minimalist design was too basic, lacking visual indicators or features they expected in a professional audio device. Others expressed a preference for more traditional or rugged designs that conveyed a different sense of reliability. 93% Customer Support 78% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided for the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They appreciated the helpfulness and responsiveness of the support team, noting that issues were resolved promptly. Users who reached out with questions or technical difficulties found the support representatives knowledgeable and courteous. 22% of users were disappointed with the customer support experience. Some reported long wait times for responses or felt that their issues were not addressed adequately. A few users mentioned that the support team lacked detailed knowledge about specific technical problems, which led to frustration and delays in resolving their concerns. 78% Feature Set 84% of users were satisfied with the feature set of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They appreciated the essential features provided, such as the vintage preamp mode and direct monitoring capabilities, which enhanced their recording experience. The simplicity of the feature set was often seen as an advantage, especially for users who preferred a straightforward approach to audio recording. 16% of users felt that the feature set was lacking. Some expressed a desire for more advanced features, such as multiple input channels or more sophisticated monitoring options. Others noted that while the existing features worked well, they hoped for additional capabilities to justify the investment further. 84% Latency Performance 86% of users were satisfied with the latency performance of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They appreciated the low-latency monitoring, which allowed them to record without noticeable delays. Users found the interface responsive and efficient, contributing to a smooth recording and mixing experience. 14% of users experienced issues with latency performance. Some reported occasional latency spikes during recording sessions, which affected their workflow. A few users noted that while the latency was generally low, it was not as competitive as higher-end models, which was a slight drawback for professional use. 86% Input/Output Options 83% of users found the input/output options of the Volt 1 Audio Interface satisfactory. They appreciated the simplicity and functionality of the available connections, which met their basic recording needs. Users who primarily focused on solo recordings or small projects felt that the interface provided adequate connectivity. 17% of users desired more input/output options. Some mentioned that the single input channel was limiting for more complex recording setups. Others hoped for additional digital outputs or MIDI connections to expand the interface's versatility and integration with other equipment. 83% Compatibility with Devices 79% of users were satisfied with the device compatibility of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They appreciated its ability to connect seamlessly with both Mac and Windows systems. Users found it easy to integrate the interface with various recording devices and microphones, contributing to a flexible setup. 21% of users encountered compatibility issues with their devices. Some reported difficulties in establishing stable connections with certain computers or operating systems. Others mentioned that while the interface worked well with newer devices, older systems sometimes required additional troubleshooting or lacked support. 79% User Manual Quality 82% of users found the user manual for the Volt 1 Audio Interface helpful and informative. They appreciated the clear instructions and detailed diagrams, which facilitated a smooth setup and understanding of the interface's features. Users valued the manual as a reliable resource for troubleshooting common issues. 18% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of the user manual. Some felt that the manual lacked depth and did not cover more advanced features or troubleshooting steps. Others expressed a preference for more comprehensive guides or video tutorials to complement the written instructions. 82% Power Supply Options 81% of users were satisfied with the power supply options for the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They appreciated the USB power option, which eliminated the need for additional adapters and made the interface more portable. Users found the power options sufficient for their recording needs. 19% of users experienced issues with the power supply options. Some reported that the USB power was not always reliable, especially when connected to certain laptops or low-power USB ports. Others wished for an included power adapter as an alternative, particularly for studio settings where consistent power was crucial. 81% Build Quality 88% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They praised its solid construction and high-quality components, which contributed to a sense of reliability and durability. Users felt confident in the interface's ability to withstand regular use and travel without compromising performance. 12% of users had concerns about the build quality. Some noted minor issues such as loose knobs or connectors, which detracted from the overall impression of robustness. A few users felt that while the build was generally good, it did not fully match the premium expectations associated with Universal Audio products. 88% Driver Stability 77% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They appreciated the reliable performance and minimal need for updates, which allowed them to focus on recording without technical interruptions. Users found the drivers compatible with most DAWs and operating systems. 23% of users experienced issues with driver stability. Some reported frequent crashes or glitches, particularly when using certain DAWs or plugins. Others mentioned that driver updates were not as frequent or comprehensive as they would have liked, leading to occasional compatibility problems. 77% Noise Levels 84% of users were satisfied with the noise levels of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They noted the clean and quiet operation, which minimized background noise during recordings. Users appreciated the interface's ability to maintain high audio fidelity, even in less-than-ideal acoustic environments. 16% of users encountered issues with noise levels. Some reported occasional hums or interference, which they attributed to the interface's preamp or power supply. Others felt that while the noise levels were generally low, they were not as competitive as those of higher-end models, affecting their satisfaction. 84% Overall User Experience 89% of users were highly satisfied with their overall experience using the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They appreciated the combination of quality sound, ease of use, and affordability, which made it a popular choice for both beginners and experienced users. The interface was often praised for enhancing their recording capabilities while maintaining simplicity. 11% of users had a less favorable overall experience. Some encountered initial setup challenges or compatibility issues that dampened their enthusiasm. Others felt that while the interface performed well, it did not offer enough features or flexibility to fully meet their specific recording needs. 89% Aesthetic Appeal 91% of users were satisfied with the aesthetic appeal of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They frequently commented on its modern, sleek design and how it complemented their home or studio setups. Users appreciated the attention to design detail, which enhanced both the visual and functional aspects of the interface. 9% of users were not completely satisfied with the aesthetic appeal. Some felt that the design was too minimalistic, lacking visual indicators or a distinctive look. Others expressed a preference for a more rugged or traditional design, which they associated with professional audio equipment. 91%	Purchase Value 85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation). Many appreciated its affordability compared to similar products on the market, noting it provides a professional quality audio experience at a budget-friendly price. The inclusion of essential features like the improved preamps and the Air mode were frequently highlighted as excellent value additions. 15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to expectations of more features that are available in higher-priced models. Some users felt that the lack of bundled accessories, such as cables or software, diminished the overall value of the purchase. 85% Quality of Material 90% of users found the quality of material to be excellent. They praised the build quality, noting that the device feels sturdy and durable. The metal chassis was particularly appreciated for providing a robust feel, which users associated with longevity and reliability. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of material. Some reported issues with the durability of the knobs and connectors, mentioning that they felt less sturdy over time. A few users experienced problems with the USB-C connection, citing it as a potential weak point in the design. 90% Ease of Use 88% of users were satisfied with the ease of use of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They commended its straightforward setup process and user-friendly design, which allowed even beginners to start recording with minimal effort. The clear labeling and intuitive layout were also frequently praised. 12% of users found the device less user-friendly than expected. Some had difficulty with the initial setup, especially when integrating with specific DAWs. Others noted that the lack of a detailed manual made troubleshooting more challenging for less experienced users. 88% Sound Quality 92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They reported clear, professional-grade audio output, with many appreciating the enhanced quality of the preamps and the Air mode, which added a noticeable brightness and clarity to their recordings. 8% of users were not fully satisfied with the sound quality. Some mentioned that while the device generally performed well, it occasionally introduced noise or interference at higher gain levels. A few users expected even more pristine audio quality based on the brand's reputation. 92% Connectivity 87% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the USB-C interface for its modern, fast, and reliable connection. Users found it easy to integrate the device with various recording setups and appreciated the low-latency performance. 13% of users faced issues with connectivity. Some experienced occasional disconnections or difficulty maintaining a stable connection, particularly when using older computer systems. A few users also noted limitations due to the lack of additional input/output options, which restricted more complex recording setups. 87% Software Integration 83% of users were pleased with the software integration capabilities of the Scarlett Solo. Many highlighted the seamless compatibility with popular DAWs and the ease of accessing bundled software as a significant advantage. 17% of users encountered challenges with software integration. Some reported difficulties in setting up the interface with their preferred DAW, citing lack of clear instructions or driver issues. Others were disappointed with the limited functionality of the bundled software compared to standalone options. 83% Portability 89% of users appreciated the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. Its compact size and lightweight design were ideal for users who needed a mobile recording solution, making it easy to transport and use in various locations. 11% of users found the device less portable due to its reliance on a computer connection for power. Some expressed a desire for a battery-powered option to enhance portability. Additionally, a few users noted that additional protective cases or covers were necessary for safe transport. 89% Durability 91% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its solid construction and the high-quality materials used, which gave them confidence in its long-term performance and resistance to wear and tear. 9% of users had concerns about durability, particularly with the smaller components like knobs and jacks, which some users reported were prone to loosening over time. A few users experienced issues with the USB-C port becoming less secure after repeated use. 91% Aesthetic Design 93% of users were highly satisfied with the aesthetic design of the Scarlett Solo. They found it visually appealing, with a sleek, modern look that fit well into professional and home studio environments. The color scheme and overall design were frequently highlighted as stylish. 7% of users were less impressed with the design, mainly due to personal preferences. Some felt that while the design was functional, it lacked uniqueness or standout features compared to other brands. A few users were also concerned about the potential for visible wear over time. 93% Customer Support 84% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Focusrite. Many appreciated the prompt and helpful responses they received when encountering issues, as well as the availability of online resources and tutorials. 16% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing long wait times and unhelpful responses in some cases. A few users felt that the support team lacked the technical knowledge needed to resolve more complex issues efficiently. 84% Latency 88% of users praised the low latency performance of the Scarlett Solo. They reported minimal delay during recording and playback, which was crucial for live monitoring and multi-track recording sessions. 12% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older or less powerful computers. Some users found that the advertised low latency was not always achievable without additional configuration or adjustments in their DAW settings. 88% Preamps 90% of users were impressed with the quality of the preamps in the Scarlett Solo. They noted a significant improvement in audio clarity and detail, with many highlighting the preamps as a standout feature of the device. 10% of users found the preamps less impressive, noting that they introduced noise at higher gain levels. Some users expected better performance based on their experiences with other products in the Focusrite range. 90% Driver Stability 86% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Scarlett Solo. They reported consistent performance and reliability across different operating systems, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions. 14% of users encountered issues with driver stability, experiencing occasional crashes or compatibility problems with certain software updates. Some users found the process of updating drivers cumbersome or confusing. 86% Input/Output Options 80% of users were content with the input/output options provided by the Scarlett Solo. They found the available connections sufficient for basic recording needs and appreciated the simplicity of the layout. 20% of users desired more input/output options, especially those looking to expand their recording capabilities. Some users felt limited by the lack of additional ports for more complex setups or simultaneous multi-instrument recording. 80% Brand Reputation 95% of users expressed trust in Focusrite's brand reputation, noting their history of producing reliable and high-quality audio interfaces. Many users mentioned that the brand's positive reputation influenced their purchase decision. 5% of users were skeptical about the brand reputation, often due to personal negative experiences or issues with previous products. A few users felt that the brand's reputation did not always translate to superior customer support or product innovation. 95% Compatibility 88% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Scarlett Solo with various systems and software. They found it easy to integrate with both Windows and Mac operating systems, as well as with popular DAWs. 12% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly when using less common DAWs or older operating systems. Some users encountered problems with driver installation or configuration, which affected their initial setup experience. 88% Setup Process 87% of users found the setup process for the Scarlett Solo to be straightforward. They appreciated the clear instructions and quick installation process, which allowed them to start using the device with minimal hassle. 13% of users encountered difficulties during setup. Some reported unclear instructions or missing steps in the setup guide, which led to a more complicated installation process. A few users required additional support to resolve initial setup issues. 87% Firmware Updates 82% of users were satisfied with the availability and effectiveness of firmware updates for the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the improvements in performance and functionality that updates provided, helping to maintain the device's reliability. 18% of users were dissatisfied with the firmware update process. Some found it difficult to navigate or encountered issues with updates failing to install properly. Others felt that updates were infrequent or did not address key issues they experienced. 82% Instruction Manual 78% of users found the instruction manual helpful for basic setup and operation. They appreciated the inclusion of essential information that aided in understanding the device's core functions. 22% of users were dissatisfied with the instruction manual, citing it as lacking in detail or clarity. Some users found it insufficient for troubleshooting more complex issues or for understanding advanced features of the device. 78% Overall Performance 89% of users were satisfied with the overall performance of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its reliability, sound quality, and ease of use, which met or exceeded their expectations for a USB audio interface in its price range. 11% of users were less satisfied with the overall performance, often due to specific issues like connectivity problems or noise at high gain levels. Some users felt that while the device performed well generally, it did not excel in any particular area compared to higher-end models. 89% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

85% of users praised the Universal Audio Volt 1 Audio Interface as an excellent value for the money. They highlighted its affordability compared to other interfaces with similar features, noting that it provides high-quality sound and robust performance without breaking the bank. Many users appreciated the inclusion of features typically found in more expensive models, such as the vintage mic preamp mode, which enhances the warmth and richness of vocal recordings.

15% of users felt that the purchase value was not up to their expectations. Some users mentioned that they expected more features for the price, such as additional input/output options or digital displays. A few also noted that while the interface was reasonably priced, they encountered issues with software compatibility that detracted from their overall satisfaction.

85%
Quality of Materials

90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They commended its sturdy build and premium feel, noting that the metal casing provides confidence in its durability and longevity. Many users appreciated the solid knobs and switches, which contribute to a professional and reliable user experience.

10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the materials used. Some reported that the knobs felt slightly loose or that the interface showed signs of wear and tear more quickly than expected. A few users also noted that the plastic components did not match the metal parts in terms of perceived quality.

90%
Sound Quality

92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They frequently mentioned the clarity and depth of the audio recordings, praising the interface for its ability to capture subtle details in both vocal and instrumental recordings. Users were particularly impressed with the vintage preamp feature, which they felt added an authentic analog warmth to their recordings.

8% of users were not completely satisfied with the sound quality. Some users encountered issues with noise or hums, which they attributed to the interface's preamp. Others felt that while the sound quality was generally good, it did not live up to the high standards set by other Universal Audio products they had experienced.

92%
Ease of Use

88% of users found the Volt 1 Audio Interface easy to use. They appreciated its straightforward setup process and intuitive controls, which allowed them to start recording quickly without needing to consult the manual extensively. The simplicity of the interface was often highlighted as a benefit, particularly by those who were new to audio recording.

12% of users reported some difficulties with ease of use. A few users struggled with the initial software installation, citing a lack of clear instructions. Others mentioned that the interface's minimalistic design sometimes led to confusion about certain functions, especially for users accustomed to more complex setups.

88%
Software Compatibility

80% of users reported satisfaction with the software compatibility of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They appreciated its seamless integration with popular digital audio workstations (DAWs) such as Pro Tools and Ableton Live. Users also valued the included software bundle, which provided additional tools for enhancing their recordings.

20% of users experienced issues with software compatibility. Some users encountered difficulties getting the interface to work with their preferred DAW, particularly on Windows operating systems. Others reported problems with driver installations or noted that certain software features were not as robust as they had hoped.

80%
Portability

87% of users were pleased with the portability of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They highlighted its compact size and lightweight design, which made it easy to transport and use in various locations. Musicians and podcasters who frequently travel appreciated the ability to maintain their recording quality on the go.

13% of users found portability to be a minor issue. Some users mentioned that while the interface was small, it required additional equipment, such as power supplies or cables, which reduced its overall portability. A few also noted that the device's size came at the expense of having fewer input/output options.

87%
Durability

89% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They noted that the solid construction and choice of materials provided a robust device capable of withstanding frequent use and occasional travel-related bumps. Users felt confident that the interface could handle their recording needs over an extended period.

11% of users expressed concerns about durability. Some reported that after several months of use, the interface developed minor issues such as loose connections or scratchy knobs. A few users felt that while the initial build quality seemed strong, the long-term durability was less certain.

89%
Design Aesthetics

93% of users were impressed with the design aesthetics of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They frequently commented on its sleek and modern look, noting that the interface added a professional appearance to their recording setup. The attention to design detail was a common point of praise, with many users appreciating the interface's stylish yet functional form.

7% of users were not fully satisfied with the design aesthetics. Some felt that the interface's minimalist design was too basic, lacking visual indicators or features they expected in a professional audio device. Others expressed a preference for more traditional or rugged designs that conveyed a different sense of reliability.

93%
Customer Support

78% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided for the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They appreciated the helpfulness and responsiveness of the support team, noting that issues were resolved promptly. Users who reached out with questions or technical difficulties found the support representatives knowledgeable and courteous.

22% of users were disappointed with the customer support experience. Some reported long wait times for responses or felt that their issues were not addressed adequately. A few users mentioned that the support team lacked detailed knowledge about specific technical problems, which led to frustration and delays in resolving their concerns.

78%
Feature Set

84% of users were satisfied with the feature set of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They appreciated the essential features provided, such as the vintage preamp mode and direct monitoring capabilities, which enhanced their recording experience. The simplicity of the feature set was often seen as an advantage, especially for users who preferred a straightforward approach to audio recording.

16% of users felt that the feature set was lacking. Some expressed a desire for more advanced features, such as multiple input channels or more sophisticated monitoring options. Others noted that while the existing features worked well, they hoped for additional capabilities to justify the investment further.

84%
Latency Performance

86% of users were satisfied with the latency performance of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They appreciated the low-latency monitoring, which allowed them to record without noticeable delays. Users found the interface responsive and efficient, contributing to a smooth recording and mixing experience.

14% of users experienced issues with latency performance. Some reported occasional latency spikes during recording sessions, which affected their workflow. A few users noted that while the latency was generally low, it was not as competitive as higher-end models, which was a slight drawback for professional use.

86%
Input/Output Options

83% of users found the input/output options of the Volt 1 Audio Interface satisfactory. They appreciated the simplicity and functionality of the available connections, which met their basic recording needs. Users who primarily focused on solo recordings or small projects felt that the interface provided adequate connectivity.

17% of users desired more input/output options. Some mentioned that the single input channel was limiting for more complex recording setups. Others hoped for additional digital outputs or MIDI connections to expand the interface's versatility and integration with other equipment.

83%
Compatibility with Devices

79% of users were satisfied with the device compatibility of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They appreciated its ability to connect seamlessly with both Mac and Windows systems. Users found it easy to integrate the interface with various recording devices and microphones, contributing to a flexible setup.

21% of users encountered compatibility issues with their devices. Some reported difficulties in establishing stable connections with certain computers or operating systems. Others mentioned that while the interface worked well with newer devices, older systems sometimes required additional troubleshooting or lacked support.

79%
User Manual Quality

82% of users found the user manual for the Volt 1 Audio Interface helpful and informative. They appreciated the clear instructions and detailed diagrams, which facilitated a smooth setup and understanding of the interface's features. Users valued the manual as a reliable resource for troubleshooting common issues.

18% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of the user manual. Some felt that the manual lacked depth and did not cover more advanced features or troubleshooting steps. Others expressed a preference for more comprehensive guides or video tutorials to complement the written instructions.

82%
Power Supply Options

81% of users were satisfied with the power supply options for the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They appreciated the USB power option, which eliminated the need for additional adapters and made the interface more portable. Users found the power options sufficient for their recording needs.

19% of users experienced issues with the power supply options. Some reported that the USB power was not always reliable, especially when connected to certain laptops or low-power USB ports. Others wished for an included power adapter as an alternative, particularly for studio settings where consistent power was crucial.

81%
Build Quality

88% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They praised its solid construction and high-quality components, which contributed to a sense of reliability and durability. Users felt confident in the interface's ability to withstand regular use and travel without compromising performance.

12% of users had concerns about the build quality. Some noted minor issues such as loose knobs or connectors, which detracted from the overall impression of robustness. A few users felt that while the build was generally good, it did not fully match the premium expectations associated with Universal Audio products.

88%
Driver Stability

77% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They appreciated the reliable performance and minimal need for updates, which allowed them to focus on recording without technical interruptions. Users found the drivers compatible with most DAWs and operating systems.

23% of users experienced issues with driver stability. Some reported frequent crashes or glitches, particularly when using certain DAWs or plugins. Others mentioned that driver updates were not as frequent or comprehensive as they would have liked, leading to occasional compatibility problems.

77%
Noise Levels

84% of users were satisfied with the noise levels of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They noted the clean and quiet operation, which minimized background noise during recordings. Users appreciated the interface's ability to maintain high audio fidelity, even in less-than-ideal acoustic environments.

16% of users encountered issues with noise levels. Some reported occasional hums or interference, which they attributed to the interface's preamp or power supply. Others felt that while the noise levels were generally low, they were not as competitive as those of higher-end models, affecting their satisfaction.

84%
Overall User Experience

89% of users were highly satisfied with their overall experience using the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They appreciated the combination of quality sound, ease of use, and affordability, which made it a popular choice for both beginners and experienced users. The interface was often praised for enhancing their recording capabilities while maintaining simplicity.

11% of users had a less favorable overall experience. Some encountered initial setup challenges or compatibility issues that dampened their enthusiasm. Others felt that while the interface performed well, it did not offer enough features or flexibility to fully meet their specific recording needs.

89%
Aesthetic Appeal

91% of users were satisfied with the aesthetic appeal of the Volt 1 Audio Interface. They frequently commented on its modern, sleek design and how it complemented their home or studio setups. Users appreciated the attention to design detail, which enhanced both the visual and functional aspects of the interface.

9% of users were not completely satisfied with the aesthetic appeal. Some felt that the design was too minimalistic, lacking visual indicators or a distinctive look. Others expressed a preference for a more rugged or traditional design, which they associated with professional audio equipment.

91%

Purchase Value

85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation). Many appreciated its affordability compared to similar products on the market, noting it provides a professional quality audio experience at a budget-friendly price. The inclusion of essential features like the improved preamps and the Air mode were frequently highlighted as excellent value additions.

15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to expectations of more features that are available in higher-priced models. Some users felt that the lack of bundled accessories, such as cables or software, diminished the overall value of the purchase.

85%
Quality of Material

90% of users found the quality of material to be excellent. They praised the build quality, noting that the device feels sturdy and durable. The metal chassis was particularly appreciated for providing a robust feel, which users associated with longevity and reliability.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of material. Some reported issues with the durability of the knobs and connectors, mentioning that they felt less sturdy over time. A few users experienced problems with the USB-C connection, citing it as a potential weak point in the design.

90%
Ease of Use

88% of users were satisfied with the ease of use of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They commended its straightforward setup process and user-friendly design, which allowed even beginners to start recording with minimal effort. The clear labeling and intuitive layout were also frequently praised.

12% of users found the device less user-friendly than expected. Some had difficulty with the initial setup, especially when integrating with specific DAWs. Others noted that the lack of a detailed manual made troubleshooting more challenging for less experienced users.

88%
Sound Quality

92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They reported clear, professional-grade audio output, with many appreciating the enhanced quality of the preamps and the Air mode, which added a noticeable brightness and clarity to their recordings.

8% of users were not fully satisfied with the sound quality. Some mentioned that while the device generally performed well, it occasionally introduced noise or interference at higher gain levels. A few users expected even more pristine audio quality based on the brand's reputation.

92%
Connectivity

87% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the USB-C interface for its modern, fast, and reliable connection. Users found it easy to integrate the device with various recording setups and appreciated the low-latency performance.

13% of users faced issues with connectivity. Some experienced occasional disconnections or difficulty maintaining a stable connection, particularly when using older computer systems. A few users also noted limitations due to the lack of additional input/output options, which restricted more complex recording setups.

87%
Software Integration

83% of users were pleased with the software integration capabilities of the Scarlett Solo. Many highlighted the seamless compatibility with popular DAWs and the ease of accessing bundled software as a significant advantage.

17% of users encountered challenges with software integration. Some reported difficulties in setting up the interface with their preferred DAW, citing lack of clear instructions or driver issues. Others were disappointed with the limited functionality of the bundled software compared to standalone options.

83%
Portability

89% of users appreciated the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. Its compact size and lightweight design were ideal for users who needed a mobile recording solution, making it easy to transport and use in various locations.

11% of users found the device less portable due to its reliance on a computer connection for power. Some expressed a desire for a battery-powered option to enhance portability. Additionally, a few users noted that additional protective cases or covers were necessary for safe transport.

89%
Durability

91% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its solid construction and the high-quality materials used, which gave them confidence in its long-term performance and resistance to wear and tear.

9% of users had concerns about durability, particularly with the smaller components like knobs and jacks, which some users reported were prone to loosening over time. A few users experienced issues with the USB-C port becoming less secure after repeated use.

91%
Aesthetic Design

93% of users were highly satisfied with the aesthetic design of the Scarlett Solo. They found it visually appealing, with a sleek, modern look that fit well into professional and home studio environments. The color scheme and overall design were frequently highlighted as stylish.

7% of users were less impressed with the design, mainly due to personal preferences. Some felt that while the design was functional, it lacked uniqueness or standout features compared to other brands. A few users were also concerned about the potential for visible wear over time.

93%
Customer Support

84% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Focusrite. Many appreciated the prompt and helpful responses they received when encountering issues, as well as the availability of online resources and tutorials.

16% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing long wait times and unhelpful responses in some cases. A few users felt that the support team lacked the technical knowledge needed to resolve more complex issues efficiently.

84%
Latency

88% of users praised the low latency performance of the Scarlett Solo. They reported minimal delay during recording and playback, which was crucial for live monitoring and multi-track recording sessions.

12% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older or less powerful computers. Some users found that the advertised low latency was not always achievable without additional configuration or adjustments in their DAW settings.

88%
Preamps

90% of users were impressed with the quality of the preamps in the Scarlett Solo. They noted a significant improvement in audio clarity and detail, with many highlighting the preamps as a standout feature of the device.

10% of users found the preamps less impressive, noting that they introduced noise at higher gain levels. Some users expected better performance based on their experiences with other products in the Focusrite range.

90%
Driver Stability

86% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Scarlett Solo. They reported consistent performance and reliability across different operating systems, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions.

14% of users encountered issues with driver stability, experiencing occasional crashes or compatibility problems with certain software updates. Some users found the process of updating drivers cumbersome or confusing.

86%
Input/Output Options

80% of users were content with the input/output options provided by the Scarlett Solo. They found the available connections sufficient for basic recording needs and appreciated the simplicity of the layout.

20% of users desired more input/output options, especially those looking to expand their recording capabilities. Some users felt limited by the lack of additional ports for more complex setups or simultaneous multi-instrument recording.

80%
Brand Reputation

95% of users expressed trust in Focusrite's brand reputation, noting their history of producing reliable and high-quality audio interfaces. Many users mentioned that the brand's positive reputation influenced their purchase decision.

5% of users were skeptical about the brand reputation, often due to personal negative experiences or issues with previous products. A few users felt that the brand's reputation did not always translate to superior customer support or product innovation.

95%
Compatibility

88% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Scarlett Solo with various systems and software. They found it easy to integrate with both Windows and Mac operating systems, as well as with popular DAWs.

12% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly when using less common DAWs or older operating systems. Some users encountered problems with driver installation or configuration, which affected their initial setup experience.

88%
Setup Process

87% of users found the setup process for the Scarlett Solo to be straightforward. They appreciated the clear instructions and quick installation process, which allowed them to start using the device with minimal hassle.

13% of users encountered difficulties during setup. Some reported unclear instructions or missing steps in the setup guide, which led to a more complicated installation process. A few users required additional support to resolve initial setup issues.

87%
Firmware Updates

82% of users were satisfied with the availability and effectiveness of firmware updates for the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the improvements in performance and functionality that updates provided, helping to maintain the device's reliability.

18% of users were dissatisfied with the firmware update process. Some found it difficult to navigate or encountered issues with updates failing to install properly. Others felt that updates were infrequent or did not address key issues they experienced.

82%
Instruction Manual

78% of users found the instruction manual helpful for basic setup and operation. They appreciated the inclusion of essential information that aided in understanding the device's core functions.

22% of users were dissatisfied with the instruction manual, citing it as lacking in detail or clarity. Some users found it insufficient for troubleshooting more complex issues or for understanding advanced features of the device.

78%
Overall Performance

89% of users were satisfied with the overall performance of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its reliability, sound quality, and ease of use, which met or exceeded their expectations for a USB audio interface in its price range.

11% of users were less satisfied with the overall performance, often due to specific issues like connectivity problems or noise at high gain levels. Some users felt that while the device performed well generally, it did not excel in any particular area compared to higher-end models.

89%

Pros:
High-quality audio conversion with 24-bit/192 kHz resolution. Compact and portable design, ideal for mobile recording. Includes vintage mic preamp mode for classic analog tones. USB-C connectivity for fast and reliable data transfer. MIDI I/O for connecting external MIDI devices. Compatible with both Mac and Windows operating systems.	High-quality preamps for clear sound recording. USB-C connectivity provides fast and reliable data transfer. Compact and portable design. Easy to use with straightforward controls and setup. Included software package offers great value.

Cons:
Limited to a single input and output, not suitable for larger recording setups. No onboard DSP for real-time effects processing. Basic monitoring options, lacking advanced features like multiple headphone outputs. Requires external power supply, not bus-powered. Higher price point compared to some other entry-level interfaces.	Limited to 2 input channels, which may not suffice for larger setups. No MIDI input/output ports. Phantom power is not individually switchable for each input. Higher price compared to some entry-level audio interfaces. Requires a computer to function, not standalone.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 1 Input / 2 Outputs	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
1 Preamp	1
Analog Audio I/O
1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)	1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.14 or Later Windows 10 (64-Bit Only) 14 or Later iPadOS 14 or Later	macOS Windows
Power Requirements
AC/DC Power Adapter (Not Included) or USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)

When comparing the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Universal Audio Volt 1 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface, several key features stand out for both devices.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo offers 2 analog inputs and 2 outputs at a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz / 24-bit. It includes 1 microphone input through an XLR 3-pin balanced mic input and a 1/4" TS unbalanced line/Hi-Z input on the front panel. For outputs, it provides dual 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs and a 1/4" TRS headphone output on the front panel. The Scarlett Solo connects to the host via a USB-C port and is compatible with both macOS and Windows. It is powered through USB bus power or an optional USB power adapter, although the adapter is not included.
On the other hand, the Universal Audio Volt 1 features a single analog input and 2 outputs, also supporting a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz / 24-bit. It includes 1 preamp for the microphone input, which is accessible through a combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced mic/line/Hi-Z input on the front panel. For outputs, it provides 2x 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs and a 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output on the front panel. The Volt 1 connects via a USB-C port and is compatible with macOS 10.14 or later, Windows 10 (64-bit only), and iPadOS 14 or later. It can be powered through an AC/DC power adapter (not included) or USB bus power.
In summary, while both interfaces support similar sampling rates and bit depths, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo offers an additional analog input channel. The Scarlett Solo is designed for straightforward macOS and Windows compatibility, whereas the Volt 1 extends its compatibility to include newer iPadOS versions. Both interfaces offer similar connectivity options, but the Volt 1 includes a versatile combo input for flexibility. Powering options for both include USB bus power, with the Scarlett Solo also being able to use an optional USB power adapter, and the Volt 1 accommodating an optional AC/DC power adapter.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 1 Input / 2 Outputs	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
1 Preamp	1
Input Level Adjustment
1x Knob	2x Knob
Expansion Slots

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Universal Audio Volt 1 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface both cater to the needs of musicians and producers seeking high-quality audio interfaces, but they have distinct differences worth noting.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo offers 2 analog inputs and 2 analog outputs, both capable of operating at a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit resolution. It accommodates a single microphone input and relies on two knobs for input level adjustment, allowing for more nuanced control over input levels. Despite lacking built-in DSP and expansion slots, the Scarlett Solo is recognized for its user-friendly interface and high-quality preamps.
In comparison, the Universal Audio Volt 1 provides 1 analog input and 2 analog outputs, also supporting up to 192 kHz at 24-bit resolution. It features one microphone preamp input and uses a single knob for input level adjustment, which may be simpler but limits the granularity of control compared to the Scarlett Solo. Like the Scarlett Solo, the Volt 1 lacks built-in DSP and expansion slots. However, Universal Audio is renowned for its audio quality and robust build, which may appeal to users prioritizing these aspects.
In summary, while both interfaces share a similar sampling rate and bit depth, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo offers greater input flexibility and more detailed input level control with its two knobs. The Universal Audio Volt 1, though more limited in input options, maintains high audio fidelity and a straightforward user experience. Both are excellent choices, with the best option depending on the specific needs and preferences of the user.

Signal Processing

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)	1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Phantom Power
48 V, Selectable On/Off	48 V, Selectable On/Off
Digital Audio I/O

Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0	USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)

Sync I/O

Network I/O

MIDI I/O
1x DIN 5-Pin Input 1x DIN 5-Pin Output

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Universal Audio Volt 1 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface both offer robust features tailored for different audio recording and production needs.
In terms of analog audio inputs, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo features a single XLR 3-pin balanced mic input and a 1/4" TS unbalanced line/Hi-Z input on the front panel. This configuration is ideal for solo musicians and podcasters who need a straightforward setup for vocal and instrument recording. The Universal Audio Volt 1, on the other hand, offers a single combo XLR-1/4" TRS input that supports both balanced and unbalanced signals for mic, line, and Hi-Z sources. This combo input provides greater flexibility for various recording scenarios, accommodating different types of microphones and instruments with ease.
Both interfaces include 48V selectable phantom power, ensuring compatibility with condenser microphones that require external power. This feature can be turned on or off as needed.
For outputs, both the Scarlett Solo and Volt 1 are equipped with two 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs and a 1/4" TRS headphone output on the front panel. These outputs allow for clear and accurate monitoring of recordings through professional studio monitors and headphones.
Regarding digital audio I/O, neither the Scarlett Solo nor the Volt 1 includes additional digital audio input or output options. Both interfaces rely solely on their analog I/O for audio connectivity.
Both models use a USB-C host connection with USB 2.0 protocol, providing a stable and fast connection to the computer for seamless audio transfer and low-latency recording.
A distinguishing feature of the Universal Audio Volt 1 is its inclusion of MIDI I/O with 1x DIN 5-pin input and 1x DIN 5-pin output. This addition makes the Volt 1 a more versatile choice for users who need to integrate MIDI controllers, keyboards, or other MIDI-enabled devices into their recording setup. The Scarlett Solo does not offer MIDI I/O, which may be a limitation for users requiring MIDI connectivity.
In summary, while both the Focusrite Scarlett Solo and the Universal Audio Volt 1 offer similar core features such as high-quality analog I/O, phantom power, and USB-C connectivity, the Volt 1 stands out with its combo input flexibility and additional MIDI I/O, making it a more versatile option for diverse recording environments. The Scarlett Solo, however, remains a solid choice for users who prioritize simplicity and straightforward analog input options.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
Up to 192 kHz	44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 / 176.4 / 192 kHz
Bit Depths
24-Bit	24-Bit
Sync Sources
Internal	Internal

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Universal Audio Volt 1 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface are both high-quality audio interfaces that cater to different needs and preferences in music production and audio recording.
In terms of sample rates, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo offers a range of 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, 176.4, and 192 kHz, providing flexibility for various recording and playback scenarios. On the other hand, the Universal Audio Volt 1 supports sample rates up to 192 kHz, which also ensures high-resolution audio recording but does not specify the intermediate sample rates available.
Both interfaces support a bit depth of 24-bit, which is standard for professional audio quality, ensuring detailed and dynamic sound recording.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo relies on internal sync sources, ensuring stability and precision in audio timing without needing external synchronization. Similarly, the Universal Audio Volt 1 also uses internal sync sources, guaranteeing consistent and reliable audio performance.
A distinguishing feature of the Universal Audio Volt 1 is its zero-latency direct monitoring, which allows you to monitor your recording input in real-time without any noticeable delay. This can be crucial for musicians and vocalists who need immediate feedback while recording. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo does not explicitly mention zero-latency monitoring but is known for its low-latency performance.
In summary, both the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation) and the Universal Audio Volt 1 are robust audio interfaces with 24-bit depth and internal sync sources. The Scarlett Solo offers a broader range of sample rates, while the Volt 1 emphasizes zero-latency direct monitoring for real-time audio feedback.

Audio Storage & Playback

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.14 or Later Windows 10 (64-Bit Only) 14 or Later iPadOS 14 or Later	macOS Windows

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Universal Audio Volt 1 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface both serve as robust solutions for audio recording and production, but they exhibit distinct differences in their specifications and compatibility features.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) is compatible with macOS and Windows operating systems, and also offers compatibility with iPadOS, making it versatile for mobile setups. This makes it a suitable choice for users who want to integrate their iPad into their recording workflow. However, detailed specifications regarding processor requirements and additional hardware are not explicitly mentioned.
On the other hand, the Universal Audio Volt 1 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface provides a more detailed list of compatible devices and operating systems. It supports macOS 10.14 or later, Windows 10 (64-bit only), and iPadOS 14 or later. Additionally, it is compatible with various Apple devices such as iPad Pro, iPad, and iPhone. The processor requirements for the Volt 1 are specified, supporting both Intel and Apple M1 processors for Mac, and Intel and AMD processors for PC, ensuring a broad range of compatibility. The necessary hardware for operation includes an available USB 2.0 port and an included USB cable. An internet connection is also required for registration and downloading necessary software or drivers.
In conclusion, while both interfaces offer solid compatibility with macOS and Windows, the Universal Audio Volt 1 goes a step further by specifying processor requirements and a broader range of compatible mobile devices, alongside necessary hardware and internet requirements for setup and operation. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo, while also versatile with mobile app compatibility, does not provide the same level of detail in its specifications.

Power
Power Requirements
AC/DC Power Adapter (Not Included) or USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)
AC/DC Power Adapter
5 VDC (Not Included)	5 VDC at 900 mA

When comparing the power requirements and specifications for the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Universal Audio Volt 1 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface, there are a few notable differences and similarities to highlight.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo operates on USB bus power and has the option to use a USB power adapter, although it is not included with the product. It also allows for an AC/DC power adapter with a specification of 5 VDC at 900 mA. The power consumption for the Focusrite Scarlett Solo is specified at 4.5 W.
On the other hand, the Universal Audio Volt 1 also supports USB bus power and can alternatively be powered by an AC/DC power adapter, which, similar to the Focusrite, is not included in the package. The required specification for the AC/DC power adapter is 5 VDC, but the exact current rating is not specified in the available details.
In essence, both interfaces are designed to be versatile in terms of power options, accommodating both USB bus power and AC/DC adapters. However, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo provides a specific power consumption figure and detailed current requirements for the AC/DC adapter, which might be useful for users who need precise power management. The Universal Audio Volt 1, while flexible in its power options, does not specify the current requirement for the AC/DC adapter, potentially leaving a slight gap in the detailed power specification.

Physical

Packaging Info
Package Weight
1.945 lb	1.305 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
8.1 x 7.7 x 3.8"	7.2 x 6.1 x 2.5"

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Universal Audio Volt 1 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface both offer USB-C connectivity, facilitating fast data transfer and low latency. However, they differ notably in their physical specifications and packaging dimensions.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo comes in a package weighing 1.305 lb, and its box dimensions are 7.2 x 6.1 x 2.5 inches. This makes it relatively lightweight and compact, which could be advantageous for users who need a portable and easy-to-store audio interface. The smaller size and weight may also suggest a more simplified setup, potentially appealing to solo artists or those with limited desk space.
In contrast, the Universal Audio Volt 1 is packaged in a box that weighs 1.945 lb, with dimensions of 8.1 x 7.7 x 3.8 inches. This indicates a bulkier and heavier unit compared to the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. The increased weight and larger box size might be indicative of more robust construction or additional internal components, which could appeal to users looking for a more substantial and potentially more durable interface. The larger dimensions may also allow for more extensive controls and connectivity options, catering to users who require a more versatile setup.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo is lighter and more compact, making it ideal for portability and simpler configurations. On the other hand, the Universal Audio Volt 1, with its heavier weight and larger dimensions, may offer a more durable build and potentially more features, suitable for users seeking a more comprehensive audio interface solution.