Elgato Wave XLR vs Audient EVO 4: Which USB-C Audio Interface is Right for You?

The Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface is designed with streamers and content creators in mind, offering a seamless integration with Elgato's ecosystem. It features a high-quality XLR input and supports up to 48V phantom power for condenser microphones, ensuring professional-grade audio capture. One of its standout features is the proprietary Clipguard technology, which prevents audio distortion by automatically adjusting the gain to handle unexpected loud noises. This makes it an excellent choice for live streaming environments. Additionally, the Wave XLR offers easy-to-use controls with a multifunctional dial for adjusting mic gain, headphone volume, and crossfade, providing users with intuitive control over their audio settings. The interface is compact and stylish, fitting well into any desktop setup.

In contrast, the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface is a versatile and affordable option for musicians, podcasters, and home studio enthusiasts. It features two high-performance EVO mic preamps and a JFET instrument input, allowing for high-quality recordings. The EVO 4 is equipped with Smartgain technology, which automatically sets the input levels for optimal recording, making it user-friendly for beginners. This interface also offers loopback functionality, which is ideal for content creators who need to capture audio from multiple sources, such as gaming streams or podcast interviews. The EVO 4 is compact and robust, featuring large, tactile controls and a sleek design that appeals to users who prioritize both aesthetics and functionality.

When comparing the two, the Elgato Wave XLR stands out for its integration with streaming software and its focus on preventing audio distortion, making it tailored for streamers. On the other hand, the Audient EVO 4 is more versatile with its dual preamps and Smartgain technology, catering to a broader range of audio recording needs. Both interfaces utilize USB-C connectivity for fast and reliable data transfer, ensuring minimal latency during recording and playback. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on the user's specific requirements; those focused on streaming might prefer the Elgato Wave XLR, while those seeking a more general recording interface might opt for the Audient EVO 4.

In the sections that follow, we will delve into a thorough comparison of the Elgato Wave XLR and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interfaces. This article will provide an in-depth examination of their specifications, alongside a discussion of their respective advantages and disadvantages, to help you make an informed decision on which device best suits your audio interface needs.

Detailed Specifications and Feature Analysis

Elgato Wave

Audient EVO 4

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 85% of users appreciated the Elgato Wave XLR for its excellent value for money. Many satisfied users highlighted that the device offers professional-level audio features typically found in more expensive interfaces, making it a cost-effective choice for both beginners and experienced audio enthusiasts. 15% of users felt that the purchase value was not justified. They expressed dissatisfaction due to the lack of certain advanced features they expected at this price point, such as multiple input options, which limited its use for more complex audio setups. 85% Quality of Materials 90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Elgato Wave XLR. They praised its robust construction and premium feel, noting that the materials contribute to both its durability and aesthetic appeal, making it a reliable choice for long-term use. 10% of users reported dissatisfaction with the materials, primarily due to concerns about the durability of certain components like knobs and connectors, which they found to be less sturdy than expected, potentially affecting the longevity of the product. 90% Ease of Use 92% of users found the Elgato Wave XLR extremely user-friendly. The interface's intuitive design and straightforward setup process were frequently mentioned, allowing users to quickly integrate it into their audio systems without extensive technical knowledge. 8% of users experienced difficulties with the initial setup and configuration, finding the lack of a detailed manual or confusing software interface to be barriers to a seamless user experience. 92% Audio Quality 95% of users were highly satisfied with the audio quality provided by the Elgato Wave XLR. Users commended the device for delivering crisp, clear sound with minimal latency, making it an excellent choice for streaming, podcasting, and professional audio recording. 5% of users experienced issues with audio quality, citing occasional static or interference that detracted from the overall sound experience. These users felt the device did not consistently meet their high expectations for audio fidelity. 95% Software Integration 88% of users praised the seamless software integration of the Elgato Wave XLR. The accompanying software was noted for its compatibility and ease of use, providing users with powerful tools to enhance their audio settings and customize their recording environment effectively. 12% of users were dissatisfied with the software integration, reporting compatibility issues with certain operating systems and a lack of updates that hindered their ability to fully utilize the device's potential. 88% Design 93% of users were impressed by the sleek and modern design of the Elgato Wave XLR. They appreciated its compact size, which allows it to fit neatly into any workspace without compromising on functionality or aesthetic appeal. 7% of users were not pleased with the design, citing that while it is visually appealing, the layout of controls and ports could be more ergonomic, leading to occasional inconvenience during use. 93% Durability 87% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Elgato Wave XLR. They noticed that the device withstood regular use without showing signs of wear, and the high-quality build contributed to their confidence in its longevity. 13% of users reported concerns about the durability, particularly with moving parts like knobs and switches, which they felt might not withstand heavy use over time, raising doubts about the product's long-term reliability. 87% Portability 80% of users valued the portability of the Elgato Wave XLR. Its compact and lightweight design was praised for making it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions or traveling, adding to its versatility. 20% of users found the portability lacking, as they desired a more rugged design that could withstand frequent transportation without risking damage, or additional protective accessories to ensure safe travel. 80% Customer Support 82% of users were pleased with the customer support offered by Elgato. They found the support team to be responsive and helpful in resolving queries and issues, enhancing their overall experience with the product. 18% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses and inadequate solutions to technical problems, which left them frustrated and less confident in the brand's commitment to customer service. 82% Compatibility 89% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Elgato Wave XLR with various operating systems and audio equipment. They found it worked seamlessly with popular DAWs and other audio hardware, making it a flexible choice for different setups. 11% of users encountered compatibility issues, particularly with older operating systems or specific audio software, which limited their ability to integrate the device into their existing setups without additional troubleshooting. 89% Build Quality 91% of users appreciated the build quality of the Elgato Wave XLR. The device was noted for its solid construction and high-quality components, which contributed to a sense of reliability and trust in its performance. 9% of users were not fully satisfied with the build quality, pointing out minor issues like loose fittings or a fragile feel in certain parts, which detracted from their overall confidence in the product's durability. 91% Latency 94% of users were delighted with the low latency performance of the Elgato Wave XLR, which provided an uninterrupted and smooth audio experience crucial for real-time applications like streaming and live recording. 6% of users noted occasional latency issues, especially when used with certain software or during complex audio processing tasks, which affected their ability to maintain a seamless recording or streaming experience. 94% Functionality 88% of users were satisfied with the functionality of the Elgato Wave XLR, appreciating the range of features it offers for managing audio inputs and outputs efficiently, making it a versatile tool for various audio tasks. 12% of users felt the functionality was limited, particularly in terms of lacking additional inputs or outputs that would accommodate more complex audio setups, which restricted its use for advanced audio projects. 88% Control Features 86% of users were satisfied with the control features of the Elgato Wave XLR. They found the controls to be intuitive and effective for adjusting audio settings quickly, enhancing their ability to manage audio levels on the fly. 14% of users were not entirely satisfied with the control features, mentioning that the limited number of physical controls required them to rely more on software, which was not always convenient for their workflow. 86% Aesthetic Appeal 90% of users appreciated the aesthetic appeal of the Elgato Wave XLR. The sleek, modern design complemented their existing setups, adding a professional look to their audio equipment collection. 10% of users were less impressed with the aesthetic appeal, feeling that while the design was modern, it lacked unique elements or personalization options that would make it stand out in a competitive market. 90% Pricing 84% of users felt the pricing of the Elgato Wave XLR was reasonable given the quality and features offered. They believed it represented a fair investment for those seeking high-quality audio recording capabilities without breaking the bank. 16% of users were dissatisfied with the pricing, arguing that similar features could be found in less expensive alternatives, which offered better value for budget-conscious consumers. 84% Noise Reduction 89% of users were satisfied with the noise reduction capabilities of the Elgato Wave XLR. They reported a significant reduction in background noise, allowing for clearer and more professional audio recordings. 11% of users found the noise reduction to be insufficient, particularly in noisy environments, where they expected better isolation and filtering to maintain audio clarity. 89% Compatibility with Accessories 85% of users were pleased with the compatibility of the Elgato Wave XLR with various audio accessories. They appreciated its ability to integrate smoothly with popular microphones and headphones, expanding its usability. 15% of users encountered issues with accessory compatibility, noting that certain microphones or headphones did not work as well as expected, requiring additional adapters or settings adjustments. 85% Input/Output Options 83% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the Elgato Wave XLR. They found the existing ports sufficient for their basic audio needs, allowing for straightforward connections with essential audio gear. 17% of users were dissatisfied with the limited input/output options, expressing a desire for additional ports to connect more devices simultaneously, which would enhance its functionality for complex audio projects. 83% Overall Satisfaction 90% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Elgato Wave XLR, noting that it met or exceeded their expectations in terms of performance, design, and ease of use, making it a worthwhile addition to their audio setup. 10% of users were not fully satisfied overall, due to a combination of minor issues like limited features or occasional technical difficulties, which affected their experience and perception of the product's value. 90%	Purchase Value 85% of users found the purchase value of the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface to be excellent. They praised its affordability compared to other interfaces offering similar quality and features. The combination of professional-grade sound and user-friendly interface made the EVO 4 a worthwhile investment for both beginners and experienced users. 15% of users felt dissatisfied, mainly due to expectations of more advanced features at a similar price point. Some users compared it to higher-tier audio interfaces and found the EVO 4 lacking in certain premium functionalities. 85% Quality of Materials 80% of users appreciated the build quality of the Audient EVO 4, noting its sturdy construction and durability. The materials used in its design were considered robust, ensuring longevity and consistent performance over time. 20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the materials, describing them as feeling somewhat 'plasticky' or less premium than expected. These users anticipated a more metallic finish and felt the interface could be more resistant to wear and tear. 80% Ease of Use 90% of users lauded the EVO 4 for its ease of use, highlighting the intuitive layout and straightforward setup process. The Smartgain feature was particularly praised for simplifying the recording process, making it accessible even for those new to audio interfaces. 10% of users found the learning curve steeper than anticipated, especially when integrating the device with certain DAWs or when seeking to maximize its potential features. This minority felt that initial setup instructions could be more comprehensive. 90% Sound Quality 92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality delivered by the Audient EVO 4. They noted the clarity and precision in audio capture, attributing these qualities to the high-quality preamps and converters. The interface was often compared favorably to more expensive models. 8% of users expressed dissatisfaction, pointing out occasional background noise or interference in specific recording environments. These users expected a completely noise-free experience and suggested that the noise floor could be improved. 92% Portability 88% of users were pleased with the portability of the EVO 4, finding its compact design and lightweight nature perfect for mobile recording setups. This portability was a major plus for users who needed to work in various locations. 12% of users felt the interface could be even more compact for easier transport in smaller bags or cases. Additionally, some mentioned that while the device was portable, the accompanying cables could be more travel-friendly. 88% Driver Stability 82% of users reported stable and reliable performance from the EVO 4's drivers, noting minimal dropouts or latency issues during recording sessions. The drivers were generally easy to install and provided consistent results across different systems. 18% of users encountered stability issues, such as occasional disconnections or compatibility problems with specific operating systems. These users suggested improvements in firmware updates to address these concerns. 82% Customer Support 78% of users found the customer support for Audient products, including the EVO 4, to be responsive and helpful. Many appreciated the prompt responses and effective solutions provided by the support team. 22% of users were dissatisfied, citing slow response times and unresolved issues. Some users felt that the support team could be more knowledgeable about technical problems specific to the EVO 4. 78% Design Aesthetics 86% of users appreciated the sleek and modern design of the EVO 4. The minimalist aesthetic and easy-to-read controls were particularly appealing, making the interface a visually attractive addition to any studio setup. 14% of users were less impressed with the design, finding it somewhat plain or lacking distinctive features that make it stand out. They suggested more customizable options or color variations to enhance its visual appeal. 86% Feature Set 84% of users were satisfied with the feature set of the EVO 4, especially the innovative Smartgain function and loopback capabilities. These features were highly valued by podcasters and streamers for their convenience and functionality. 16% of users felt that the feature set could be expanded. Some expected additional inputs or outputs and more advanced routing options, which they believed would enhance the interface's versatility and appeal. 84% Integration with DAWs 87% of users reported seamless integration of the EVO 4 with various DAWs, highlighting the ease of setting up and using the interface with popular software like Ableton Live and Logic Pro. The compatibility across multiple platforms was a significant benefit. 13% of users faced challenges with DAW integration, noting occasional issues with recognition or configuration settings. These users suggested that more detailed guidance or tutorials could assist in resolving such problems. 87% Latency 89% of users were happy with the low latency performance of the EVO 4, praising its ability to deliver real-time monitoring without noticeable delay. This capability was crucial for live recording and streaming applications. 11% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older systems or during high-demand tasks. They recommended optimization options or settings adjustments to further reduce latency. 89% Durability 81% of users felt confident in the durability of the EVO 4, mentioning the solid construction and resilience of the device under regular use. This durability was a key factor in their positive long-term experience. 19% of users questioned the device's longevity, citing concerns over the durability of knobs and connectors. They suggested improvements in the build quality of these components to enhance overall durability. 81% Setup Process 88% of users found the setup process of the EVO 4 straightforward and quick, allowing them to start recording within minutes. The simplicity of connecting and configuring the device was a major convenience for users. 12% of users experienced difficulties during setup, often related to driver installation or configuration with their computer systems. They recommended clearer instructions or more detailed setup guides to assist new users. 88% Headphone Output Quality 85% of users praised the quality of the headphone output, noting the clear and accurate sound reproduction. This aspect was particularly important for monitoring and mixing tasks. 15% of users felt the headphone output could be improved, mentioning issues like insufficient volume levels or slight distortion at higher volumes. They suggested enhancements to the amplifier quality for better performance. 85% Microphone Preamp Quality 91% of users were impressed with the microphone preamp quality, which provided clean and transparent sound capture with minimal noise. This feature was highly valued by musicians and vocalists for its professional-level performance. 9% of users were less satisfied, citing specific instances of noise or interference in certain environments. They suggested that further refinement in preamp design could mitigate these issues. 91% USB-C Connectivity 93% of users appreciated the USB-C connectivity, which ensured fast data transfer and reliable power delivery. This modern connection standard was a key advantage for users with newer devices. 7% of users encountered connectivity issues, often related to incompatible cables or ports. They recommended clearer compatibility information and potentially including a USB-C to USB-A adapter. 93% Loopback Functionality 86% of users found the loopback functionality of the EVO 4 extremely useful, especially for podcasting and live streaming. This feature allowed for easy routing of audio from different sources, enhancing the flexibility of the interface. 14% of users struggled with configuring loopback settings, experiencing difficulties in achieving the desired audio routing. They suggested more detailed instructions or user support for this feature. 86% Compatibility with Operating Systems 84% of users were satisfied with the operating system compatibility of the EVO 4, highlighting its smooth operation on both Windows and macOS platforms. The plug-and-play nature was a significant convenience for many users. 16% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with Linux systems or during updates to newer OS versions. They recommended expanding support and providing more frequent driver updates. 84% Control Knob Functionality 82% of users valued the functionality of the control knob, which allowed for precise adjustments and easy navigation of settings. The tactile feel and responsiveness were often highlighted as positive aspects. 18% of users felt the control knob could be improved, noting occasional issues with responsiveness or durability. They suggested enhancements to the knob's design for a smoother user experience. 82% Overall Satisfaction 88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Audient EVO 4, citing its combination of high-quality sound, user-friendly features, and reliable performance as key factors in their positive experience. The interface met or exceeded expectations for most users. 12% of users were less satisfied overall, often due to specific issues like driver stability or feature limitations that impacted their experience. They recommended addressing these concerns to improve the product's appeal. 88% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

85% of users appreciated the Elgato Wave XLR for its excellent value for money. Many satisfied users highlighted that the device offers professional-level audio features typically found in more expensive interfaces, making it a cost-effective choice for both beginners and experienced audio enthusiasts.

15% of users felt that the purchase value was not justified. They expressed dissatisfaction due to the lack of certain advanced features they expected at this price point, such as multiple input options, which limited its use for more complex audio setups.

85%
Quality of Materials

90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Elgato Wave XLR. They praised its robust construction and premium feel, noting that the materials contribute to both its durability and aesthetic appeal, making it a reliable choice for long-term use.

10% of users reported dissatisfaction with the materials, primarily due to concerns about the durability of certain components like knobs and connectors, which they found to be less sturdy than expected, potentially affecting the longevity of the product.

90%
Ease of Use

92% of users found the Elgato Wave XLR extremely user-friendly. The interface's intuitive design and straightforward setup process were frequently mentioned, allowing users to quickly integrate it into their audio systems without extensive technical knowledge.

8% of users experienced difficulties with the initial setup and configuration, finding the lack of a detailed manual or confusing software interface to be barriers to a seamless user experience.

92%
Audio Quality

95% of users were highly satisfied with the audio quality provided by the Elgato Wave XLR. Users commended the device for delivering crisp, clear sound with minimal latency, making it an excellent choice for streaming, podcasting, and professional audio recording.

5% of users experienced issues with audio quality, citing occasional static or interference that detracted from the overall sound experience. These users felt the device did not consistently meet their high expectations for audio fidelity.

95%
Software Integration

88% of users praised the seamless software integration of the Elgato Wave XLR. The accompanying software was noted for its compatibility and ease of use, providing users with powerful tools to enhance their audio settings and customize their recording environment effectively.

12% of users were dissatisfied with the software integration, reporting compatibility issues with certain operating systems and a lack of updates that hindered their ability to fully utilize the device's potential.

88%
Design

93% of users were impressed by the sleek and modern design of the Elgato Wave XLR. They appreciated its compact size, which allows it to fit neatly into any workspace without compromising on functionality or aesthetic appeal.

7% of users were not pleased with the design, citing that while it is visually appealing, the layout of controls and ports could be more ergonomic, leading to occasional inconvenience during use.

93%
Durability

87% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Elgato Wave XLR. They noticed that the device withstood regular use without showing signs of wear, and the high-quality build contributed to their confidence in its longevity.

13% of users reported concerns about the durability, particularly with moving parts like knobs and switches, which they felt might not withstand heavy use over time, raising doubts about the product's long-term reliability.

87%
Portability

80% of users valued the portability of the Elgato Wave XLR. Its compact and lightweight design was praised for making it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions or traveling, adding to its versatility.

20% of users found the portability lacking, as they desired a more rugged design that could withstand frequent transportation without risking damage, or additional protective accessories to ensure safe travel.

80%
Customer Support

82% of users were pleased with the customer support offered by Elgato. They found the support team to be responsive and helpful in resolving queries and issues, enhancing their overall experience with the product.

18% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses and inadequate solutions to technical problems, which left them frustrated and less confident in the brand's commitment to customer service.

82%
Compatibility

89% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Elgato Wave XLR with various operating systems and audio equipment. They found it worked seamlessly with popular DAWs and other audio hardware, making it a flexible choice for different setups.

11% of users encountered compatibility issues, particularly with older operating systems or specific audio software, which limited their ability to integrate the device into their existing setups without additional troubleshooting.

89%
Build Quality

91% of users appreciated the build quality of the Elgato Wave XLR. The device was noted for its solid construction and high-quality components, which contributed to a sense of reliability and trust in its performance.

9% of users were not fully satisfied with the build quality, pointing out minor issues like loose fittings or a fragile feel in certain parts, which detracted from their overall confidence in the product's durability.

91%
Latency

94% of users were delighted with the low latency performance of the Elgato Wave XLR, which provided an uninterrupted and smooth audio experience crucial for real-time applications like streaming and live recording.

6% of users noted occasional latency issues, especially when used with certain software or during complex audio processing tasks, which affected their ability to maintain a seamless recording or streaming experience.

94%
Functionality

88% of users were satisfied with the functionality of the Elgato Wave XLR, appreciating the range of features it offers for managing audio inputs and outputs efficiently, making it a versatile tool for various audio tasks.

12% of users felt the functionality was limited, particularly in terms of lacking additional inputs or outputs that would accommodate more complex audio setups, which restricted its use for advanced audio projects.

88%
Control Features

86% of users were satisfied with the control features of the Elgato Wave XLR. They found the controls to be intuitive and effective for adjusting audio settings quickly, enhancing their ability to manage audio levels on the fly.

14% of users were not entirely satisfied with the control features, mentioning that the limited number of physical controls required them to rely more on software, which was not always convenient for their workflow.

86%
Aesthetic Appeal

90% of users appreciated the aesthetic appeal of the Elgato Wave XLR. The sleek, modern design complemented their existing setups, adding a professional look to their audio equipment collection.

10% of users were less impressed with the aesthetic appeal, feeling that while the design was modern, it lacked unique elements or personalization options that would make it stand out in a competitive market.

90%
Pricing

84% of users felt the pricing of the Elgato Wave XLR was reasonable given the quality and features offered. They believed it represented a fair investment for those seeking high-quality audio recording capabilities without breaking the bank.

16% of users were dissatisfied with the pricing, arguing that similar features could be found in less expensive alternatives, which offered better value for budget-conscious consumers.

84%
Noise Reduction

89% of users were satisfied with the noise reduction capabilities of the Elgato Wave XLR. They reported a significant reduction in background noise, allowing for clearer and more professional audio recordings.

11% of users found the noise reduction to be insufficient, particularly in noisy environments, where they expected better isolation and filtering to maintain audio clarity.

89%
Compatibility with Accessories

85% of users were pleased with the compatibility of the Elgato Wave XLR with various audio accessories. They appreciated its ability to integrate smoothly with popular microphones and headphones, expanding its usability.

15% of users encountered issues with accessory compatibility, noting that certain microphones or headphones did not work as well as expected, requiring additional adapters or settings adjustments.

85%
Input/Output Options

83% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the Elgato Wave XLR. They found the existing ports sufficient for their basic audio needs, allowing for straightforward connections with essential audio gear.

17% of users were dissatisfied with the limited input/output options, expressing a desire for additional ports to connect more devices simultaneously, which would enhance its functionality for complex audio projects.

83%
Overall Satisfaction

90% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Elgato Wave XLR, noting that it met or exceeded their expectations in terms of performance, design, and ease of use, making it a worthwhile addition to their audio setup.

10% of users were not fully satisfied overall, due to a combination of minor issues like limited features or occasional technical difficulties, which affected their experience and perception of the product's value.

90%

Purchase Value

85% of users found the purchase value of the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface to be excellent. They praised its affordability compared to other interfaces offering similar quality and features. The combination of professional-grade sound and user-friendly interface made the EVO 4 a worthwhile investment for both beginners and experienced users.

15% of users felt dissatisfied, mainly due to expectations of more advanced features at a similar price point. Some users compared it to higher-tier audio interfaces and found the EVO 4 lacking in certain premium functionalities.

85%
Quality of Materials

80% of users appreciated the build quality of the Audient EVO 4, noting its sturdy construction and durability. The materials used in its design were considered robust, ensuring longevity and consistent performance over time.

20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the materials, describing them as feeling somewhat 'plasticky' or less premium than expected. These users anticipated a more metallic finish and felt the interface could be more resistant to wear and tear.

80%
Ease of Use

90% of users lauded the EVO 4 for its ease of use, highlighting the intuitive layout and straightforward setup process. The Smartgain feature was particularly praised for simplifying the recording process, making it accessible even for those new to audio interfaces.

10% of users found the learning curve steeper than anticipated, especially when integrating the device with certain DAWs or when seeking to maximize its potential features. This minority felt that initial setup instructions could be more comprehensive.

90%
Sound Quality

92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality delivered by the Audient EVO 4. They noted the clarity and precision in audio capture, attributing these qualities to the high-quality preamps and converters. The interface was often compared favorably to more expensive models.

8% of users expressed dissatisfaction, pointing out occasional background noise or interference in specific recording environments. These users expected a completely noise-free experience and suggested that the noise floor could be improved.

92%
Portability

88% of users were pleased with the portability of the EVO 4, finding its compact design and lightweight nature perfect for mobile recording setups. This portability was a major plus for users who needed to work in various locations.

12% of users felt the interface could be even more compact for easier transport in smaller bags or cases. Additionally, some mentioned that while the device was portable, the accompanying cables could be more travel-friendly.

88%
Driver Stability

82% of users reported stable and reliable performance from the EVO 4's drivers, noting minimal dropouts or latency issues during recording sessions. The drivers were generally easy to install and provided consistent results across different systems.

18% of users encountered stability issues, such as occasional disconnections or compatibility problems with specific operating systems. These users suggested improvements in firmware updates to address these concerns.

82%
Customer Support

78% of users found the customer support for Audient products, including the EVO 4, to be responsive and helpful. Many appreciated the prompt responses and effective solutions provided by the support team.

22% of users were dissatisfied, citing slow response times and unresolved issues. Some users felt that the support team could be more knowledgeable about technical problems specific to the EVO 4.

78%
Design Aesthetics

86% of users appreciated the sleek and modern design of the EVO 4. The minimalist aesthetic and easy-to-read controls were particularly appealing, making the interface a visually attractive addition to any studio setup.

14% of users were less impressed with the design, finding it somewhat plain or lacking distinctive features that make it stand out. They suggested more customizable options or color variations to enhance its visual appeal.

86%
Feature Set

84% of users were satisfied with the feature set of the EVO 4, especially the innovative Smartgain function and loopback capabilities. These features were highly valued by podcasters and streamers for their convenience and functionality.

16% of users felt that the feature set could be expanded. Some expected additional inputs or outputs and more advanced routing options, which they believed would enhance the interface's versatility and appeal.

84%
Integration with DAWs

87% of users reported seamless integration of the EVO 4 with various DAWs, highlighting the ease of setting up and using the interface with popular software like Ableton Live and Logic Pro. The compatibility across multiple platforms was a significant benefit.

13% of users faced challenges with DAW integration, noting occasional issues with recognition or configuration settings. These users suggested that more detailed guidance or tutorials could assist in resolving such problems.

87%
Latency

89% of users were happy with the low latency performance of the EVO 4, praising its ability to deliver real-time monitoring without noticeable delay. This capability was crucial for live recording and streaming applications.

11% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older systems or during high-demand tasks. They recommended optimization options or settings adjustments to further reduce latency.

89%
Durability

81% of users felt confident in the durability of the EVO 4, mentioning the solid construction and resilience of the device under regular use. This durability was a key factor in their positive long-term experience.

19% of users questioned the device's longevity, citing concerns over the durability of knobs and connectors. They suggested improvements in the build quality of these components to enhance overall durability.

81%
Setup Process

88% of users found the setup process of the EVO 4 straightforward and quick, allowing them to start recording within minutes. The simplicity of connecting and configuring the device was a major convenience for users.

12% of users experienced difficulties during setup, often related to driver installation or configuration with their computer systems. They recommended clearer instructions or more detailed setup guides to assist new users.

88%
Headphone Output Quality

85% of users praised the quality of the headphone output, noting the clear and accurate sound reproduction. This aspect was particularly important for monitoring and mixing tasks.

15% of users felt the headphone output could be improved, mentioning issues like insufficient volume levels or slight distortion at higher volumes. They suggested enhancements to the amplifier quality for better performance.

85%
Microphone Preamp Quality

91% of users were impressed with the microphone preamp quality, which provided clean and transparent sound capture with minimal noise. This feature was highly valued by musicians and vocalists for its professional-level performance.

9% of users were less satisfied, citing specific instances of noise or interference in certain environments. They suggested that further refinement in preamp design could mitigate these issues.

91%
USB-C Connectivity

93% of users appreciated the USB-C connectivity, which ensured fast data transfer and reliable power delivery. This modern connection standard was a key advantage for users with newer devices.

7% of users encountered connectivity issues, often related to incompatible cables or ports. They recommended clearer compatibility information and potentially including a USB-C to USB-A adapter.

93%
Loopback Functionality

86% of users found the loopback functionality of the EVO 4 extremely useful, especially for podcasting and live streaming. This feature allowed for easy routing of audio from different sources, enhancing the flexibility of the interface.

14% of users struggled with configuring loopback settings, experiencing difficulties in achieving the desired audio routing. They suggested more detailed instructions or user support for this feature.

86%
Compatibility with Operating Systems

84% of users were satisfied with the operating system compatibility of the EVO 4, highlighting its smooth operation on both Windows and macOS platforms. The plug-and-play nature was a significant convenience for many users.

16% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with Linux systems or during updates to newer OS versions. They recommended expanding support and providing more frequent driver updates.

84%
Control Knob Functionality

82% of users valued the functionality of the control knob, which allowed for precise adjustments and easy navigation of settings. The tactile feel and responsiveness were often highlighted as positive aspects.

18% of users felt the control knob could be improved, noting occasional issues with responsiveness or durability. They suggested enhancements to the knob's design for a smoother user experience.

82%
Overall Satisfaction

88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Audient EVO 4, citing its combination of high-quality sound, user-friendly features, and reliable performance as key factors in their positive experience. The interface met or exceeded expectations for most users.

12% of users were less satisfied overall, often due to specific issues like driver stability or feature limitations that impacted their experience. They recommended addressing these concerns to improve the product's appeal.

88%

Pros:
High-quality audio conversion with 24-bit/96kHz resolution. Easy integration with popular streaming software. Customizable capacitive mute button for quick muting. Wave Link software allows for advanced audio routing and mixing. Compact and sleek design fits well on any desktop. USB-C connectivity ensures fast and stable data transfer.	High-quality preamps with 58dB gain range. Smartgain feature for automatic level adjustment. Compact and portable design. USB-C connectivity for fast data transfer. Low latency performance. User-friendly interface with LED metering.

Cons:
Limited to a single XLR input, which may be restrictive for some users. No built-in effects or processing options like some other interfaces. Relatively higher price point compared to basic audio interfaces. Requires the Wave Link software for full functionality, adding complexity. No standalone power supply, reliant on USB power.	Limited to two input channels. Plastic construction may feel less durable. No MIDI input/output. Requires USB-C compatible devices for optimal performance.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 1 Input / 2 Outputs at 48/96 kHz	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 96 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	96 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
1 Preamp	2 Preamps
Analog Audio I/O
1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Headphone Output	2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output
Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
OS Compatibility
Windows 10	macOS 10.7.5 or Later Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit) 6 or Later
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

The Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface offers a straightforward setup with 1 Input and 2 Outputs, supporting a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz at 24-Bit depth. It features 1 Microphone Input with an XLR 3-Pin balanced mic input, making it suitable for solo recording setups. The audio interface is equipped with a 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Headphone Output, and connects via USB-C. It is compatible with Windows 10 and requires USB Bus Power for operation.Show More

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 1 Input / 2 Outputs at 48/96 kHz	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 96 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	96 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
1 Preamp	2 Preamps
Input Level Adjustment
1x Knob	2x Automatic 1x Knob
Expansion Slots

The Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface features a configuration of 1 Analog Input and 2 Outputs, supporting a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz at 24-Bit. This interface is designed for users who require a single microphone input, utilizing 1 Microphone Preamp. Furthermore, it offers an Input Level Adjustment through a single knob, making it straightforward for users to manage their audio levels. However, it does not include any built-in microphones or expansion slots.Show More

Signal Processing
Pad

Gain/Trim Range
75 dB	Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs: 58 dB
High-Pass Filter
80 to 120 Hz
Solo/Mute
Mute per Master	Mute per Input Channel, Master

The Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface features a gain/trim range of 75 dB, providing ample flexibility for various recording situations. Additionally, it incorporates a high-pass filter adjustable between 80 to 120 Hz, which helps eliminate unwanted low-frequency noise from recordings. In terms of mute functionality, the Elgato Wave XLR allows for mute per master, making it easier to manage audio output during live sessions or recordings.Show More

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Headphone Output	2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output
Phantom Power
48 V, Selectable On/Off	48 V ± 4 V, Selectable On/Off (Selectable on Individual Inputs)
Digital Audio I/O

Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
USB 3.0 / 3.1/3.2 Gen 1	USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)

Sync I/O

Network I/O

MIDI I/O

The Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface features a single XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input and a 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Headphone Output. This interface is designed for simplicity, making it ideal for streamers and podcasters who need a straightforward solution for audio input. It supports 48 V Phantom Power, which is selectable on or off, ensuring compatibility with various condenser microphones. The connectivity is facilitated through a USB-C host connection that supports USB 3.0 / 3.1/3.2 Gen 1. Notably, it lacks any digital audio I/O, sync I/O, network I/O, or MIDI I/O capabilities.Show More

Performance
Frequency Response
20 Hz to 20 kHz	Mic Inputs: 10 Hz to 40 kHz ±0.5 dB Line, Hi-Z Inputs: 10 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.5 dB A/D Converters: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB D/A Converters: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB Headphone Outputs: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB
Maximum Input Level
10 V	Mic Inputs: +16 dBu Hi-Z Inputs: +10 dBu
Headphone Output Power
1/8" / 3.5 mm: 77 mW	45 mW into 30 Ohms (Max) 52 mW into 60 Ohms (Max) 20 mW into 600 Ohms (Max)
Dynamic Range
100 dB	AD/DA Converters: 113 dBA

When comparing the Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface, one of the standout differences lies in their frequency response. The Elgato Wave XLR boasts a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz, which is suitable for most basic audio applications. In contrast, the Audient EVO 4 offers a more extensive range, with its mic inputs reaching 10 Hz to 40 kHz, and line/Hi-Z inputs covering 10 Hz to 20 kHz. This broader frequency response provides greater fidelity and detail in audio reproduction.Show More

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
48 / 96 kHz	Up to 96 kHz
Sample Rate Conversion

Bit Depths
24-Bit	Up to 24-Bit

The Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface supports sample rates of 48 / 96 kHz and has a bit depth of 24-Bit. However, it does not feature sample rate conversion, which means that it operates at the specified sample rates without the ability to convert to other rates. This can limit flexibility in certain audio production scenarios.Show More

Audio Storage & Playback
Memory Card Slot

The Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface both share a common feature: they do not come equipped with a Memory Card Slot. This means that neither interface supports direct recording to a memory card, which can be a factor for users looking for portable solutions or ease of data transfer.Show More

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
Windows 10	macOS 10.7.5 or Later Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit) 6 or Later
Internet Connection
Required for Software/Driver Download	Required for Registration, Software/Driver Download

The Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface is designed for use with Windows 10 operating systems, making it a straightforward choice for users within that ecosystem. However, it does require an internet connection for software and driver downloads, which could be a consideration for users with limited connectivity.Show More

Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

The Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface both utilize USB Bus Power, which allows for convenient operation without the need for external power sources. This feature is particularly beneficial for users who require portability and ease of setup, as both interfaces can be powered directly from the computer they are connected to.Show More

Packaging Info
Package Weight
1.68 lb	1.29 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
7.6 x 6.1 x 3.9"	6.8 x 3.85 x 3.55"

The Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface has a package weight of 1.68 lb and dimensions of 7.6 x 6.1 x 3.9". This slightly heavier weight and larger size suggest a robust build, which may appeal to users looking for a durable and sturdy device for professional use. The compact dimensions also indicate that it is designed to be portable, making it suitable for both studio and on-the-go setups.Show More