Focusrite Vocaster One vs Elgato Wave XLR: Which USB-C Audio Interface is Right for You?

Focusrite Vocaster One vs Elgato Wave XLR: Which USB-C Audio Interface is Right for You?

The Focusrite Vocaster One USB-C Audio Interface and the Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface are both designed for creators looking to enhance their audio quality. The Focusrite Vocaster One is tailored specifically for podcasters, offering a user-friendly interface with features that streamline the podcasting process. It provides a high-quality preamp, allowing for clear and professional sound, and includes options like an auto-gain function that automatically adjusts levels to avoid distortion. This makes it ideal for beginners or those who want to focus on content creation without worrying about technical details. The Vocaster One is compact and lightweight, making it a portable option for creators on the go.


In contrast, the Elgato Wave XLR is targeted more towards streamers and gamers who require a versatile audio solution. It integrates seamlessly with the Wave Link software, offering advanced digital mixing capabilities. The Wave XLR features a capacitive mute button, gain control, and a Clipguard technology that prevents distortion even when audio levels peak. This interface is designed to work with XLR microphones, providing high-quality audio input and output. Its sturdy build and intuitive controls make it a reliable choice for those who need to manage multiple audio sources during live streaming or content creation.


Both interfaces utilize USB-C connectivity, ensuring fast and reliable data transfer. However, the Focusrite Vocaster One shines with its simplicity and ease of use, making it a great choice for podcasters who want to focus on storytelling without technical distractions. Meanwhile, the Elgato Wave XLR excels in providing more control and flexibility for streamers who need to manage complex audio setups. Ultimately, the choice between these two interfaces depends on the user's specific needs—whether it's the straightforward functionality of the Vocaster One or the advanced features of the Wave XLR.

In the following sections, we will delve into a detailed comparison of the specifications, advantages, and disadvantages of the Focusrite Vocaster One and Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interfaces. This comprehensive examination will help you understand the strengths and weaknesses of each product, enabling you to make an informed decision based on your audio interface needs.

Detailed Specifications and Comparative Analysis

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
  • Purchase Value

    85% of users appreciated the Elgato Wave XLR for its excellent value for money. Many satisfied users highlighted that the device offers professional-level audio features typically found in more expensive interfaces, making it a cost-effective choice for both beginners and experienced audio enthusiasts.

    15% of users felt that the purchase value was not justified. They expressed dissatisfaction due to the lack of certain advanced features they expected at this price point, such as multiple input options, which limited its use for more complex audio setups.

    85%
  • Quality of Materials

    90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Elgato Wave XLR. They praised its robust construction and premium feel, noting that the materials contribute to both its durability and aesthetic appeal, making it a reliable choice for long-term use.

    10% of users reported dissatisfaction with the materials, primarily due to concerns about the durability of certain components like knobs and connectors, which they found to be less sturdy than expected, potentially affecting the longevity of the product.

    90%
  • Ease of Use

    92% of users found the Elgato Wave XLR extremely user-friendly. The interface's intuitive design and straightforward setup process were frequently mentioned, allowing users to quickly integrate it into their audio systems without extensive technical knowledge.

    8% of users experienced difficulties with the initial setup and configuration, finding the lack of a detailed manual or confusing software interface to be barriers to a seamless user experience.

    92%
  • Audio Quality

    95% of users were highly satisfied with the audio quality provided by the Elgato Wave XLR. Users commended the device for delivering crisp, clear sound with minimal latency, making it an excellent choice for streaming, podcasting, and professional audio recording.

    5% of users experienced issues with audio quality, citing occasional static or interference that detracted from the overall sound experience. These users felt the device did not consistently meet their high expectations for audio fidelity.

    95%
  • Software Integration

    88% of users praised the seamless software integration of the Elgato Wave XLR. The accompanying software was noted for its compatibility and ease of use, providing users with powerful tools to enhance their audio settings and customize their recording environment effectively.

    12% of users were dissatisfied with the software integration, reporting compatibility issues with certain operating systems and a lack of updates that hindered their ability to fully utilize the device's potential.

    88%
  • Design

    93% of users were impressed by the sleek and modern design of the Elgato Wave XLR. They appreciated its compact size, which allows it to fit neatly into any workspace without compromising on functionality or aesthetic appeal.

    7% of users were not pleased with the design, citing that while it is visually appealing, the layout of controls and ports could be more ergonomic, leading to occasional inconvenience during use.

    93%
  • Durability

    87% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Elgato Wave XLR. They noticed that the device withstood regular use without showing signs of wear, and the high-quality build contributed to their confidence in its longevity.

    13% of users reported concerns about the durability, particularly with moving parts like knobs and switches, which they felt might not withstand heavy use over time, raising doubts about the product's long-term reliability.

    87%
  • Portability

    80% of users valued the portability of the Elgato Wave XLR. Its compact and lightweight design was praised for making it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions or traveling, adding to its versatility.

    20% of users found the portability lacking, as they desired a more rugged design that could withstand frequent transportation without risking damage, or additional protective accessories to ensure safe travel.

    80%
  • Customer Support

    82% of users were pleased with the customer support offered by Elgato. They found the support team to be responsive and helpful in resolving queries and issues, enhancing their overall experience with the product.

    18% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses and inadequate solutions to technical problems, which left them frustrated and less confident in the brand's commitment to customer service.

    82%
  • Compatibility

    89% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Elgato Wave XLR with various operating systems and audio equipment. They found it worked seamlessly with popular DAWs and other audio hardware, making it a flexible choice for different setups.

    11% of users encountered compatibility issues, particularly with older operating systems or specific audio software, which limited their ability to integrate the device into their existing setups without additional troubleshooting.

    89%
  • Build Quality

    91% of users appreciated the build quality of the Elgato Wave XLR. The device was noted for its solid construction and high-quality components, which contributed to a sense of reliability and trust in its performance.

    9% of users were not fully satisfied with the build quality, pointing out minor issues like loose fittings or a fragile feel in certain parts, which detracted from their overall confidence in the product's durability.

    91%
  • Latency

    94% of users were delighted with the low latency performance of the Elgato Wave XLR, which provided an uninterrupted and smooth audio experience crucial for real-time applications like streaming and live recording.

    6% of users noted occasional latency issues, especially when used with certain software or during complex audio processing tasks, which affected their ability to maintain a seamless recording or streaming experience.

    94%
  • Functionality

    88% of users were satisfied with the functionality of the Elgato Wave XLR, appreciating the range of features it offers for managing audio inputs and outputs efficiently, making it a versatile tool for various audio tasks.

    12% of users felt the functionality was limited, particularly in terms of lacking additional inputs or outputs that would accommodate more complex audio setups, which restricted its use for advanced audio projects.

    88%
  • Control Features

    86% of users were satisfied with the control features of the Elgato Wave XLR. They found the controls to be intuitive and effective for adjusting audio settings quickly, enhancing their ability to manage audio levels on the fly.

    14% of users were not entirely satisfied with the control features, mentioning that the limited number of physical controls required them to rely more on software, which was not always convenient for their workflow.

    86%
  • Aesthetic Appeal

    90% of users appreciated the aesthetic appeal of the Elgato Wave XLR. The sleek, modern design complemented their existing setups, adding a professional look to their audio equipment collection.

    10% of users were less impressed with the aesthetic appeal, feeling that while the design was modern, it lacked unique elements or personalization options that would make it stand out in a competitive market.

    90%
  • Pricing

    84% of users felt the pricing of the Elgato Wave XLR was reasonable given the quality and features offered. They believed it represented a fair investment for those seeking high-quality audio recording capabilities without breaking the bank.

    16% of users were dissatisfied with the pricing, arguing that similar features could be found in less expensive alternatives, which offered better value for budget-conscious consumers.

    84%
  • Noise Reduction

    89% of users were satisfied with the noise reduction capabilities of the Elgato Wave XLR. They reported a significant reduction in background noise, allowing for clearer and more professional audio recordings.

    11% of users found the noise reduction to be insufficient, particularly in noisy environments, where they expected better isolation and filtering to maintain audio clarity.

    89%
  • Compatibility with Accessories

    85% of users were pleased with the compatibility of the Elgato Wave XLR with various audio accessories. They appreciated its ability to integrate smoothly with popular microphones and headphones, expanding its usability.

    15% of users encountered issues with accessory compatibility, noting that certain microphones or headphones did not work as well as expected, requiring additional adapters or settings adjustments.

    85%
  • Input/Output Options

    83% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the Elgato Wave XLR. They found the existing ports sufficient for their basic audio needs, allowing for straightforward connections with essential audio gear.

    17% of users were dissatisfied with the limited input/output options, expressing a desire for additional ports to connect more devices simultaneously, which would enhance its functionality for complex audio projects.

    83%
  • Overall Satisfaction

    90% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Elgato Wave XLR, noting that it met or exceeded their expectations in terms of performance, design, and ease of use, making it a worthwhile addition to their audio setup.

    10% of users were not fully satisfied overall, due to a combination of minor issues like limited features or occasional technical difficulties, which affected their experience and perception of the product's value.

    90%
  • Purchase Value

    87% of users praised the purchase value of the Focusrite Vocaster One, emphasizing that it offers a comprehensive set of features at an attractive price point. Users appreciated the combination of high-quality audio output, ease of use, and the robust build quality, which they felt justified the investment. Many found it to be a reliable and cost-effective solution for podcasters and home studio setups, noting that it competes well against more expensive alternatives in the market.

    Some users, making up 13% of those surveyed, felt that the purchase value was lacking due to the absence of certain advanced features they expected at this price range. These users expressed dissatisfaction with the limited input options and perceived that the interface was more suited for beginners rather than experienced audio professionals seeking more versatility.

    87%
  • Quality of Materials

    90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Focusrite Vocaster One. They appreciated the sturdy construction and high-grade components that contributed to its durability. Users noted that the device felt solid and well-made, which gave them confidence in its longevity and ability to withstand regular use in various environments.

    10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of materials, citing concerns about the plastic components feeling less premium compared to other products in the same category. These users worried about the long-term durability, especially when used in more demanding settings, and suggested improvements in the tactile feel of the control knobs and buttons.

    90%
  • Ease of Use

    92% of users found the Focusrite Vocaster One extremely easy to use, highlighting its intuitive interface and straightforward setup process. Many appreciated the user-friendly design that allowed them to start recording quickly with minimal technical hurdles. The clear labeling and accessible controls were also frequently mentioned as positive aspects that contributed to a smooth user experience.

    A small segment, 8% of users, reported challenges with the ease of use, primarily due to the lack of detailed documentation or tutorials for some of the more nuanced features. These users found the initial setup somewhat confusing and suggested that more comprehensive guidance could enhance the user experience, particularly for those new to audio interfaces.

    92%
  • Sound Quality

    94% of users were delighted with the sound quality provided by the Focusrite Vocaster One. They consistently praised its clear and crisp audio output, which they found to be a significant improvement over previous models or other brands they had used. Many users highlighted the device's ability to capture detailed sound with minimal noise, making it ideal for professional-level recordings.

    6% of users were not entirely satisfied with the sound quality, mentioning occasional issues with noise interference or unexpected audio artifacts. Some experienced users felt that while the sound quality was generally good, it didn't quite match the performance of higher-end interfaces they had tried, particularly in more demanding recording situations.

    94%
  • Portability

    85% of users appreciated the portability of the Focusrite Vocaster One, noting its compact size and lightweight design as key benefits. Many found it convenient to transport, which made it suitable for on-the-go recording sessions or mobile studio setups. Users also liked that it didn't require much space, both for storage and during use.

    15% of users found the portability somewhat lacking, primarily due to the need for additional gear like microphones and cables, which added to the bulk. These users felt that while the interface itself was portable, the overall setup still required significant space, making it less convenient for truly mobile applications.

    85%
  • Compatibility

    89% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Focusrite Vocaster One, highlighting its seamless integration with various operating systems and digital audio workstations. Users found it easy to connect and configure with their existing setups, which made it a versatile choice for different recording environments.

    11% of users experienced compatibility issues, particularly with older operating systems or less common DAWs, which sometimes required additional troubleshooting or updates. These users expressed frustration with the lack of plug-and-play functionality in these cases, suggesting that broader compatibility support would enhance the product's appeal.

    89%
  • Customer Support

    82% of users reported positive interactions with Focusrite's customer support, commending the prompt and helpful responses they received. Many appreciated the knowledgeable staff who were able to resolve their queries quickly, contributing to an overall positive ownership experience.

    18% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed response times or insufficient solutions to their problems. Some users felt that the support team could be more proactive and better equipped to handle complex technical issues, which would significantly improve user satisfaction.

    82%
  • Aesthetic Design

    88% of users enjoyed the aesthetic design of the Focusrite Vocaster One, describing it as sleek and modern. Many users appreciated the attention to detail in its appearance, which complemented their recording spaces and added a professional touch to their setups.

    12% of users were not completely satisfied with the aesthetic design, feeling that it lacked distinctive features that would make it stand out from other similar devices. Some suggested that more color options or customizable design elements could enhance its visual appeal and align better with personal preferences.

    88%
  • Durability

    91% of users were impressed with the durability of the Focusrite Vocaster One, noting that it withstood regular use without showing signs of wear. Users highlighted the device's ability to maintain performance over time, which reinforced their confidence in its build quality.

    9% of users expressed concerns about durability, mentioning isolated incidents of wear and tear after extended use. These users suggested that while the overall construction was solid, certain components, such as the knobs or connectors, could benefit from further reinforcement to enhance longevity.

    91%
  • Latency Performance

    93% of users were very satisfied with the latency performance of the Focusrite Vocaster One, often noting its impressive speed and responsiveness. Many users commented on the device's ability to handle real-time monitoring with minimal delay, which was particularly beneficial for live recordings and streaming.

    7% of users experienced issues with latency, particularly when using certain software or under specific system configurations. These users noted occasional lag that disrupted their workflow, suggesting that further optimization could improve performance consistency across various setups.

    93%
  • Software Integration

    86% of users found the software integration with the Focusrite Vocaster One to be smooth and reliable. Many appreciated the bundled software and drivers, which enhanced functionality and provided additional recording options. Users also valued the ease of accessing updates and additional features through the software platform.

    14% of users encountered difficulties with software integration, particularly with initial setup or compatibility with certain plugins. These users suggested that clearer instructions and more robust software support could alleviate these issues, improving the overall user experience.

    86%
  • Input/Output Options

    84% of users were content with the input/output options available on the Focusrite Vocaster One. They appreciated the straightforward layout and the availability of essential connections for typical recording needs, which met the expectations of most casual users.

    16% of users expressed a desire for more input/output options, feeling that the current configuration limited their ability to connect multiple devices simultaneously. These users, often with more complex setups, suggested that additional ports would enhance flexibility and accommodate a broader range of recording scenarios.

    84%
  • Driver Stability

    88% of users reported stable driver performance with the Focusrite Vocaster One, emphasizing the reliability and consistency of the device across various recording sessions. Users appreciated the lack of crashes or disruptions, which allowed them to focus on their creative work without technical distractions.

    12% of users experienced instability with drivers, particularly following updates or when used with certain operating systems. These users reported occasional crashes or errors that interrupted their workflow, suggesting that ongoing driver optimization and support could improve stability and user confidence.

    88%
  • Setup Process

    91% of users found the setup process for the Focusrite Vocaster One to be straightforward and hassle-free. Many users highlighted the clear instructions and user-friendly design that enabled them to get started quickly, even if they were new to audio interfaces.

    9% of users encountered difficulties during setup, primarily due to complications with software installation or unclear instructions for certain features. These users suggested that more detailed setup guides or video tutorials could enhance the initial experience and reduce setup time for new users.

    91%
  • Build Quality

    92% of users were highly satisfied with the build quality of the Focusrite Vocaster One, praising its robust construction and well-engineered components. Users commonly mentioned the interface's solid feel and reliability, which reassured them of its ability to withstand frequent use and transport.

    8% of users noted concerns with build quality, particularly regarding the durability of certain external components like knobs or buttons. These users suggested that while the overall build was strong, some parts could be improved to prevent wear and tear over time, especially under heavy usage.

    92%
  • User Interface

    90% of users appreciated the user interface of the Focusrite Vocaster One, citing its clean design and intuitive control layout. Users found it easy to navigate the various features and settings, which contributed to an efficient and enjoyable recording experience.

    10% of users found the user interface less intuitive, especially when accessing more advanced features. These users suggested that a more customizable interface or additional user guidance could enhance usability, particularly for those with specific or complex audio needs.

    90%
  • Firmware Updates

    86% of users were pleased with the availability and impact of firmware updates for the Focusrite Vocaster One. They appreciated the regular updates that improved performance and added new features, demonstrating the company's commitment to maintaining and enhancing their product.

    14% of users expressed frustration with firmware updates, particularly when updates introduced new bugs or required extensive troubleshooting. These users suggested that more thorough testing before release could prevent such issues and ensure smoother experiences with each update.

    86%
  • Microphone Preamp Quality

    93% of users were impressed by the microphone preamp quality of the Focusrite Vocaster One. They frequently noted the clarity and fidelity of recordings, highlighting the preamp's ability to capture nuanced audio details with minimal noise interference.

    7% of users were less satisfied with the preamp quality, particularly when using certain types of microphones. These users felt that the preamps could struggle with very low-output microphones, suggesting that enhancements in gain range or noise handling could improve performance across different mic types.

    93%
  • Expandability

    80% of users found the Focusrite Vocaster One to meet their needs in terms of expandability, appreciating its ability to integrate with other equipment through standard connections. Many users felt the core features were sufficient for their current recording projects.

    20% of users were dissatisfied with the expandability, particularly those looking to build more extensive or modular recording setups. These users expressed a desire for more ports or integration options that would allow for a broader range of devices and future growth in their recording capabilities.

    80%
  • Value for Beginners

    89% of users believed the Focusrite Vocaster One offered great value for beginners, citing its intuitive design and comprehensive feature set as ideal for those new to audio recording. Many felt that it provided a gentle learning curve while offering room for skill development.

    11% of users felt that beginners might be overwhelmed by some of the features or lack sufficient guidance in the initial stages. These users suggested that including more beginner-friendly tutorials or simplified settings could help new users gain confidence and maximize the interface's potential.

    89%
  • Professional Use Suitability

    82% of users found the Focusrite Vocaster One suitable for professional use, particularly praising its reliable performance and high-quality sound output. Many users noted that it met the demands of professional projects while remaining accessible and easy to use.

    18% of users felt that the interface fell short for professional use, particularly when compared to more advanced or specialized equipment. These users mentioned limitations in input/output options and customization features, suggesting that the Vocaster One might be better suited for semi-professional or hobbyist applications rather than high-end professional studios.

    82%
Show More
Pros:
  • High-quality audio conversion with 24-bit/96kHz resolution.
  • Easy integration with popular streaming software.
  • Customizable capacitive mute button for quick muting.
  • Wave Link software allows for advanced audio routing and mixing.
  • Compact and sleek design fits well on any desktop.
  • USB-C connectivity ensures fast and stable data transfer.
  • High-quality audio recording with 24-bit/48kHz resolution.
  • User-friendly interface ideal for podcasters and solo content creators.
  • Compact and portable design.
  • Direct monitoring feature with zero-latency.
  • Phantom power support for condenser microphones.
  • Easy setup with USB-C connectivity.
Cons:
  • Limited to a single XLR input, which may be restrictive for some users.
  • No built-in effects or processing options like some other interfaces.
  • Relatively higher price point compared to basic audio interfaces.
  • Requires the Wave Link software for full functionality, adding complexity.
  • No standalone power supply, reliant on USB power.
  • Limited to a single XLR input, not suitable for multi-person recordings.
  • No MIDI input/output for more advanced music production needs.
  • Lacks additional features like multiple headphone outputs.
  • Higher price point compared to some entry-level interfaces.
Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog:
1 Input / 2 Outputs at 48/96 kHz
1 Input / 2 Outputs
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit 48 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
1 Preamp 1 Preamp
Analog Audio I/O
1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Headphone Output
1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRRS Unbalanced Smartphone In/Out
1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Main Output
Host Connection
1x USB-C 1x USB-C (Class-Compliant)
OS Compatibility
Windows 10 macOS
Windows
iPadOS
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power AC/DC Power Adapter (Not Included) or USB Bus Power

The Focusrite Vocaster One and Elgato Wave XLR are both high-quality USB-C audio interfaces designed for streamers and podcasters, yet they cater to different needs and specifications. The Vocaster One offers a configuration of 1 Input and 2 Outputs, while the Wave XLR also provides 1 Input and 2 Outputs but is capable of higher sampling rates. The Vocaster One supports a maximum sampling rate of 48 kHz / 24-Bit, in contrast to the Wave XLR, which boasts a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz / 24-Bit.Show More


In terms of microphone inputs, both devices feature 1 Preamp with an XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input. However, the Vocaster One includes additional audio inputs and outputs, such as a 1/8" TRRS Unbalanced Smartphone In/Out and a 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output, along with 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Outputs and an extra 1/8" Main Output. The Elgato Wave XLR, on the other hand, has a more streamlined setup with just a 1/8" TRS Headphone Output.


Both interfaces utilize a USB-C host connection; however, the Vocaster One is compatible with macOS, Windows, and iPadOS, while the Wave XLR is limited to Windows 10. This makes the Vocaster One more versatile for users with different operating systems. In terms of power requirements, the Vocaster One requires an AC/DC Power Adapter (Not Included) or USB Bus Power, whereas the Wave XLR operates solely on USB Bus Power, making it potentially more convenient for portable setups.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog:
1 Input / 2 Outputs at 48/96 kHz
1 Input / 2 Outputs
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit 48 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
1 Preamp 1 Preamp
Built-In Microphone
Input Level Adjustment
1x Knob 1x Knob
Expansion Slots

The Focusrite Vocaster One USB-C Audio Interface offers a straightforward design with 1 input and 2 outputs. It operates with a maximum sampling rate of 48 kHz at 24-bit depth, making it suitable for basic audio recording needs. The interface includes 1 preamp for microphone input, but it does not feature a built-in microphone. Input level adjustment is simple with a single knob, ensuring ease of use for beginners.Show More


In contrast, the Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface presents a more advanced option with 1 input and 2 outputs as well, but it supports a higher maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz at 24-bit. This makes it a better choice for those seeking higher audio fidelity. Like the Vocaster One, it includes 1 preamp for microphone input and lacks a built-in microphone. Input level adjustment is also managed through a single knob, providing a similar user-friendly experience.


Overall, while both audio interfaces share similar features such as the number of inputs and outputs, the Focusrite Vocaster One is limited to a maximum sampling rate of 48 kHz, whereas the Elgato Wave XLR offers enhanced audio quality with up to 96 kHz. This makes the Elgato Wave XLR a preferable option for users looking for higher resolution audio recording capabilities.

Signal Processing
Pad
Gain/Trim Range
75 dB Up to 70 dB
High-Pass Filter
80 to 120 Hz
Solo/Mute
Mute per Master Mute per Input Channel

The Focusrite Vocaster One USB-C Audio Interface and the Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface both offer unique features tailored to different user needs in audio production. Starting with the gain/trim range, the Focusrite Vocaster One provides a robust range of up to 70 dB, which is suitable for a variety of microphones and recording situations. In contrast, the Elgato Wave XLR boasts a slightly higher gain/trim range of 75 dB, allowing for greater flexibility when working with low-output microphones, making it more adaptable for different audio environments.Show More


In terms of filtering capabilities, the Focusrite Vocaster One does not include a high-pass filter, which may be a limitation for users looking to eliminate low-frequency noise. Conversely, the Elgato Wave XLR features a high-pass filter operating between 80 to 120 Hz, providing users with the ability to clean up their audio by removing unwanted low-frequency sounds, thus enhancing the overall audio clarity.


When it comes to solo/mute functionality, the Focusrite Vocaster One allows for mute per input channel, giving users more control over individual audio sources during recording sessions. On the other hand, the Elgato Wave XLR provides a mute per master option, which can be advantageous for users who prefer a more streamlined approach to managing their audio output as a whole. This difference may appeal to different types of users depending on their workflow preferences.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Headphone Output
1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRRS Unbalanced Smartphone In/Out
1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output
1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Main Output
Phantom Power
48 V, Selectable On/Off 48 V, Selectable On/Off
Digital Audio I/O
Host Connection
1x USB-C 1x USB-C (Class-Compliant)
Host Connection Protocol
USB 3.0 / 3.1/3.2 Gen 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1/3.2 Gen 1
USB (Non-Host)
Sync I/O
Network I/O
MIDI I/O

The Focusrite Vocaster One USB-C Audio Interface features a comprehensive analog audio I/O configuration, including 1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input, 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRRS Unbalanced Smartphone In/Out, and 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output. Additionally, it supports 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Outputs and 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Main Output. This versatility makes it suitable for a variety of recording situations, whether for podcasting or music production.Show More


On the other hand, the Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface also offers a solid analog audio I/O setup with 1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input and 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Headphone Output. However, it lacks the additional smartphone input and multiple monitor outputs found in the Vocaster One, which may limit its flexibility in some scenarios.


Both interfaces provide phantom power of 48 V, which is selectable on and off, ensuring compatibility with a range of condenser microphones. They share similar digital audio I/O specifications, as both devices do not support it. In terms of connectivity, both models feature a single USB-C host connection utilizing the USB 3.0 / 3.1/3.2 Gen 1 protocol, ensuring efficient data transfer.


Neither the Focusrite Vocaster One nor the Elgato Wave XLR includes sync I/O, network I/O, or MIDI I/O, which keeps the design streamlined, focusing on audio input and output capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between these two interfaces will come down to the specific needs regarding audio routing and connection options, with the Vocaster One offering a more extensive I/O configuration compared to the Elgato Wave XLR.

Performance
Frequency Response
20 Hz to 20 kHz Inputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz +0/-0.5 dB
1/8" / 3.5 mm Line Outputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz
1/4" Line Outputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.15 dB
1/4" Headphone Outputs:
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.5 dB
Maximum Input Level
10 V Mic Inputs:
+12.5 dBu (Min Gain)
Aux Inputs:
+1 dBu
Headphone Output Power
1/8" / 3.5 mm:
77 mW
28 mW into 33 Ohms
8.5 mW into 270 Ohms

When comparing the Focusrite Vocaster One and the Elgato Wave XLR, both USB-C audio interfaces exhibit robust frequency response capabilities, with the Vocaster One offering a frequency range of 20 Hz to 20 kHz across all input and output types, while the Wave XLR also maintains a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz. This makes both interfaces suitable for capturing a wide range of audio frequencies effectively.Show More


In terms of maximum input levels, the Vocaster One provides a higher input level for mic inputs at +12.5 dBu, whereas the Wave XLR has a maximum input level of 10 V. This suggests that the Vocaster One may be better suited for more sensitive microphones and higher gain applications. The maximum output levels also vary, with the Vocaster One delivering outputs at +14 dBu for its 1/4" line outputs, while the Elgato does not specify output levels in the same way, focusing instead on its dynamic range of 100 dB.


The headphone output power is another distinguishing factor. The Vocaster One outputs 28 mW into 33 Ohms and 8.5 mW into 270 Ohms, providing flexibility for different headphone impedances. In contrast, the Wave XLR delivers a significantly higher headphone output power of 77 mW via its 1/8" / 3.5 mm jack, which may appeal more to users requiring powerful monitoring capabilities.


Lastly, with regards to impedance, the Vocaster One's mic inputs have an impedance of 3 Kilohms, while the Wave XLR does not specify its mic input impedance. This could be a consideration for users looking to match specific microphones with the interface. Overall, while both interfaces have their strengths, the choice between the two will depend on specific audio needs and preferences.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
48 / 96 kHz Up to 48 kHz
Sample Rate Conversion
Bit Depths
24-Bit 24-Bit

The Focusrite Vocaster One USB-C Audio Interface offers a sample rate of up to 48 kHz and a bit depth of 24-Bit. It operates with internal sync sources and does not feature sample rate conversion. This makes it a solid choice for users who require reliable audio quality for podcasting, streaming, or recording without the need for higher sample rates.Show More


In contrast, the Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface supports sample rates of 48 / 96 kHz, also with a bit depth of 24-Bit. Similar to the Vocaster One, it does not include sample rate conversion. The inclusion of the higher sample rate option may appeal to users looking for more flexibility in their audio projects, particularly for more detailed recordings or high-fidelity applications.


In summary, while both interfaces are equipped with 24-Bit bit depth and lack sample rate conversion, the key difference lies in the sample rates offered. The Focusrite Vocaster One maxes out at 48 kHz, whereas the Elgato Wave XLR provides an additional option of 96 kHz, catering to different needs depending on the desired audio quality and application.

Audio Storage & Playback
Memory Card Slot

The Focusrite Vocaster One USB-C Audio Interface and the Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface are both exceptional devices designed for content creators, podcasters, and musicians. In terms of memory card slots, both interfaces do not come equipped with this feature, which means users will need to rely on their connected computer or other storage solutions for recording and playback.Show More


When considering connectivity, both interfaces utilize USB-C, ensuring fast data transfer and compatibility with modern devices. This feature is essential for reducing latency during recording sessions and for maintaining high audio quality. Additionally, the USB-C connection allows for easy plug-and-play functionality, making both devices user-friendly.


In terms of audio quality, both the Focusrite Vocaster One and the Elgato Wave XLR are designed to deliver high-fidelity sound, catering to the needs of professional and amateur users alike. They both offer various input options to accommodate different microphones and instruments, providing versatility in their applications.


Ultimately, while the lack of a memory card slot is a commonality between the Focusrite Vocaster One and the Elgato Wave XLR, both interfaces stand out in their respective capabilities and features, making them suitable choices for anyone looking to enhance their audio recording experience.

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
Windows 10 macOS
Windows
iPadOS
Internet Connection
Required for Software/Driver Download Required for Registration, Software/Driver Download

The Focusrite Vocaster One USB-C Audio Interface is compatible with multiple operating systems including macOS, Windows, and iPadOS. This versatility makes it a solid choice for users who operate across different platforms. In contrast, the Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface is specifically designed for Windows 10, which limits its usability for macOS and iPad users.Show More


When it comes to included software, the Focusrite Vocaster One does not come with any bundled software or plug-ins, which may require users to seek out third-party solutions for their audio needs. On the other hand, the Elgato Wave XLR also lacks included software, so users will need to rely on external applications for their audio recording and processing requirements.


Regarding mobile device compatibility, the Focusrite Vocaster One supports iPad connectivity with a USB-C port, making it a more versatile option for users who want to utilize their audio interface with mobile devices. The Elgato Wave XLR, however, does not explicitly mention mobile device compatibility, suggesting it is primarily designed for desktop use.


Both interfaces require an internet connection for software or driver downloads, emphasizing the need for initial setup before use. However, the Focusrite Vocaster One specifies the need for an available USB-A port, adding another layer of hardware consideration for potential users. In contrast, the Elgato Wave XLR does not mention specific hardware requirements beyond the necessary USB-C connection.

Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power AC/DC Power Adapter (Not Included) or USB Bus Power

The Focusrite Vocaster One USB-C Audio Interface offers flexible power requirements, allowing it to be powered via an AC/DC Power Adapter (not included) or USB Bus Power. The device requires a power adapter of 5 VDC at 1 A, with a maximum power consumption of 4 W. This versatility makes it suitable for various setups, whether in a studio or on the go, but the need for an external adapter can be a limitation for some users.Show More


In contrast, the Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface is designed exclusively for USB Bus Power. This means it doesn't require an external power source, making it more straightforward to set up and use, especially for those who prefer a more portable solution. The reliance on USB power allows for easy connectivity, reducing the clutter of additional cables and adapters.


Overall, while both interfaces cater to different user preferences, the Focusrite Vocaster One provides more flexibility in power options, potentially appealing to those who need a more robust setup. On the other hand, the Elgato Wave XLR emphasizes portability and ease of use, which may be more attractive for users seeking a quick and efficient audio interface solution.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
1.68 lb 1.645 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
7.6 x 6.1 x 3.9" 10.1 x 8.1 x 3.2"

The Focusrite Vocaster One USB-C Audio Interface has a package weight of 1.645 lb and box dimensions of 10.1 x 8.1 x 3.2 inches. This makes it slightly lighter than its competitor while also presenting a more elongated form factor which may be beneficial for certain setups where space is a consideration.Show More


On the other hand, the Elgato Wave XLR USB-C Audio Interface features a package weight of 1.68 lb and its box dimensions measure 7.6 x 6.1 x 3.9 inches. Although it is marginally heavier, its more compact dimensions could make it easier to integrate into smaller spaces or portable setups.


In summary, while both audio interfaces are similar in weight and functionality, the Focusrite Vocaster One offers a lighter build with larger dimensions, whereas the Elgato Wave XLR provides a more compact design that may appeal to users with limited workspace. Choosing between the two will largely depend on personal preferences regarding weight and size.

Customer Images
Videos