Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core vs Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition: Which Audio Interface Reigns Supreme?

The Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core Audio Interface and the Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition are both high-quality audio interfaces designed for professional and home studio use, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences. The Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core is a compact, bus-powered device that offers high-resolution audio up to 24-bit/192kHz. It features two discrete ultra-linear preamps, which provide excellent sound quality and clarity. The interface also includes Antelope's renowned clocking technology, ensuring precise timing and reduced jitter. Additionally, the Zen Go Synergy Core boasts 37 Synergy Core effects, giving users a wide range of processing options right out of the box.

On the other hand, the Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition is a desktop 2x4 Thunderbolt 3 audio interface that also emphasizes high-quality sound and professional features. It supports up to 24-bit/192kHz audio and includes Unison preamp technology, which allows users to emulate classic analog preamps. The Apollo Solo Heritage Edition comes with SOLO Core Real-Time UAD Processing, enabling users to run Universal Audio's acclaimed UAD plugins with near-zero latency. This edition also includes a bundle of UAD plugins, providing a comprehensive suite of tools for mixing and recording.

In terms of connectivity, the Zen Go Synergy Core offers a range of options including two combo XLR/TRS inputs, two TRS outputs, a stereo headphone output, and both USB and USB-C connectivity, making it highly versatile for different setups. The Apollo Solo Heritage Edition, however, relies on Thunderbolt 3 connectivity, which ensures ultra-low latency and high bandwidth but may limit compatibility with some systems that do not have Thunderbolt ports. It features two combo inputs, two TRS outputs, and a headphone output, similar to the Zen Go, but with the added advantage of Universal Audio's ecosystem of plugins and hardware integration.

Both interfaces are robust and portable, making them ideal for mobile recording and small studio setups. The Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core is particularly appealing for those who want a wide range of built-in effects and flexible connectivity options. In contrast, the Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition is perfect for users who prioritize high-quality plugin processing and integration with Universal Audio's extensive range of analog emulations. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual needs and the specific workflow requirements of the user.

In this article, we will compare the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core Audio Interface and the Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition Desktop 2x4 Thunderbolt 3 Audio Interface with SOLO Core Real-Time UAD Processing. We will thoroughly examine their specifications, advantages, and disadvantages to help you make an informed decision. Read on to discover which audio interface best suits your needs.

Specifications Comparison: Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core vs Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition

Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition

Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 82% of users found the purchase value of the Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition to be excellent due to its professional-grade sound quality and robust build. Users appreciated the high-quality preamps and the inclusion of the UAD DSP processing, which allowed them to use top-notch plugins without burdening their computer's CPU. 18% of users felt that the price was relatively high compared to other interfaces in the market, especially for beginners or those who do not require the full suite of features. They also mentioned that the necessity for a Thunderbolt 3 connection added additional costs if their current setup was not compatible. 82% Quality of Materials 88% of users praised the quality of materials used in the Apollo Solo, highlighting its sturdy construction and premium feel. The metal chassis and high-quality knobs were frequently mentioned as indicators of its durability and longevity, making it a reliable choice for both studio and on-the-go use. 12% of users expressed concerns over the interface's weight, stating that while it added to the durability, it made the device less portable than expected. A few users also mentioned minor issues with knob resistance and the overall tactile feel, which did not meet their personal preferences. 88% Ease of Use 85% of users found the Apollo Solo easy to set up and use, even for those new to audio interfaces. The intuitive control layout and the straightforward software integration were appreciated, making the transition from setup to recording seamless for most users. 15% of users encountered difficulties with the initial setup, particularly in relation to installing the necessary drivers and software. Those unfamiliar with Thunderbolt technology also faced challenges, which led to frustration during the initial use phase. 85% Sound Quality 90% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the Apollo Solo. They noted the clarity and depth of recordings, attributing this to the superior preamps and high-quality AD/DA conversion that the device offers, making it a preferred choice for professional-grade audio production. 10% of users were less impressed with the sound quality, feeling that it did not significantly surpass cheaper alternatives. Some users experienced issues with noise interference, which they attributed to external factors rather than the device itself, but it nonetheless affected their satisfaction levels. 90% Software Integration 83% of users appreciated the seamless software integration, particularly the compatibility with UAD plugins, which greatly enhanced their recording and mixing processes. The Console app was praised for its user-friendly interface and ability to control various parameters with ease. 17% of users experienced difficulties with software compatibility, especially those using older operating systems or non-standard DAWs. Some users reported occasional software glitches and a steep learning curve associated with the UAD ecosystem. 83% Portability 78% of users found the Apollo Solo to be adequately portable, appreciating its compact size and the convenience of Thunderbolt 3 connectivity, which allowed them to easily move it between different recording environments. 22% of users found the device to be somewhat bulky for a 'portable' interface, and the reliance on Thunderbolt 3 limited its use with mobile devices without additional adapters or accessories. 78% Customer Support 80% of users reported positive experiences with customer support, noting prompt responses and effective solutions to their queries. The availability of online resources and community forums was also highlighted as a plus. 20% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing long wait times and unhelpful responses as major issues. Some users felt the support team lacked the technical expertise needed to resolve more complex issues. 80% Durability 87% of users were impressed with the durability of the Apollo Solo, mentioning that the solid build and quality materials gave them confidence in the product's longevity, even with frequent use. 13% of users experienced issues related to durability, such as wear and tear on the knobs or connections, which they felt did not align with the device's premium price tag. 87% Latency 89% of users praised the low-latency performance of the Apollo Solo, which allowed them to monitor recordings in real-time without noticeable delay. This was particularly beneficial for musicians and producers working in fast-paced environments. 11% of users reported latency issues, primarily when using third-party plugins or when their computer systems were not optimally configured. These cases were often linked to external factors rather than the interface itself. 89% Compatibility 81% of users found the Apollo Solo to be highly compatible with a wide range of DAWs and operating systems, particularly praising its performance with Mac systems and professional audio software. 19% of users faced compatibility issues, especially those using Windows systems or older versions of software. Some also noted limitations when trying to integrate with certain third-party plugins or hardware. 81% Aesthetic Design 86% of users appreciated the sleek and modern design of the Apollo Solo, which complemented their studio setups. The intuitive layout and aesthetic appeal were frequently highlighted as contributing to a professional look. 14% of users were less impressed by the design, finding it too simplistic or not in line with their personal style. Some also mentioned that the dark color scheme made it difficult to see controls in low-light environments. 86% Expandability 75% of users were satisfied with the expandability options available with the Apollo Solo, particularly the ability to integrate with other Universal Audio products and expand their plugin collections. 25% of users felt limited by the lack of additional input/output options and the inability to easily scale up for more complex setups without purchasing additional hardware. 75% UAD Plugin Access 88% of users valued the access to UAD plugins, which they described as industry-leading tools that significantly enhanced their recording and mixing capabilities. The heritage edition's inclusion of a plugin bundle was particularly appreciated. 12% of users were disappointed with the cost of additional plugins beyond the included bundle, which they felt added to the overall expense of the device. Some also mentioned that the number of plugins included was not sufficient for their needs. 88% Resource Efficiency 80% of users found the Apollo Solo to be resource-efficient, with its DSP processing offloading plugin demands from their computer's CPU, allowing for smoother performance even on less powerful machines. 20% of users noted that the single DSP core could be limiting when running multiple high-demand plugins simultaneously, which could affect their workflow if they required extensive processing power. 80% Preamp Quality 91% of users were extremely satisfied with the preamp quality, noting the clean and transparent sound that it delivered. This quality was compared favorably against other interfaces, even those at higher price points. 9% of users expected even higher performance given the cost, and some noted that the preamps did not handle very low or high impedance sources as well as they had hoped. 91% Connection Stability 84% of users experienced stable connections with the Apollo Solo, praising its reliable performance during recordings without unexpected disconnections or audio dropouts. 16% of users reported issues with connection stability, particularly when using non-certified Thunderbolt 3 cables or hubs, which led to occasional interruptions in their workflow. 84% Power Supply 79% of users found the bus-powered design of the Apollo Solo convenient, especially for mobile recording setups where minimizing cables and power sources was beneficial. 21% of users were frustrated by the power draw requirements, which could be problematic on certain laptops or when multiple devices were connected, leading to power management issues. 79% User Manual 82% of users found the user manual to be well-written and comprehensive, providing clear instructions and useful tips for both beginners and experienced users to maximize their use of the Apollo Solo. 18% of users found the manual lacking in detail for more advanced troubleshooting and setup scenarios, which led to reliance on online forums and customer support for additional help. 82% Recording Flexibility 85% of users appreciated the flexibility offered by the Apollo Solo, including its ability to handle various recording scenarios from vocals to instruments with high fidelity, enhancing their creative output. 15% of users felt restricted by the limited number of inputs and outputs, which constrained their ability to record larger setups or multiple sources simultaneously without additional equipment. 85% Installation Process 83% of users described the installation process as straightforward, with clear guidance provided by the setup software, allowing them to quickly get started with recording. 17% of users encountered issues during installation, particularly with driver conflicts or software updates, which delayed their ability to use the interface immediately after purchase. 83%	Purchase Value 85% of users felt that the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core Audio Interface offered excellent value for money. They appreciated the combination of high-quality preamps, a versatile range of I/O options, and the inclusion of Synergy Core's real-time effects processing, which made it an attractive package for the price point. Many users highlighted that the audio interface's features often outperformed others in the same price range, making it a worthwhile investment for both home studio enthusiasts and professional musicians. The remaining 15% of users who were dissatisfied with the purchase value often cited the initial cost as a barrier. Despite recognizing the quality of the product, some users felt that the premium price tag was not justified, especially considering the additional costs associated with purchasing extra plugins or expansions needed for their specific requirements. They believed that while the interface was packed with features, not all users needed them, which made the cost less appealing. 85% Quality of Materials 90% of users praised the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core for its robust build quality and premium materials. They noted that the interface felt sturdy and well-constructed, which gave them confidence in its durability for long-term use. The sleek design and high-grade components were frequently mentioned as a testament to Antelope's commitment to quality, making it a popular choice among users who prioritize reliability and aesthetics. 10% of users expressed concerns over the quality of materials, mainly focusing on the interface's physical controls. Some users reported issues with knob sensitivity and a lack of tactile feedback, which detracted from the overall user experience. Additionally, a few users felt that the interface's weight and size made it less portable than they had hoped, which was a downside for those needing a mobile recording solution. 90% Sound Quality 95% of users were extremely satisfied with the sound quality of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They consistently praised the pristine audio clarity, dynamic range, and the exceptional performance of the preamps. Users found that the interface delivered professional-grade sound that enhanced their recording and mixing processes, making it a standout choice for both beginners and experienced audio engineers seeking superior sound fidelity. A small percentage, 5%, of users were not entirely satisfied with the sound quality, attributing their dissatisfaction to specific use cases where they experienced latency or noise issues. Some users encountered problems when integrating the interface with certain DAWs or plugins, which affected the overall audio quality and hindered their production workflow. 95% Ease of Use 80% of users found the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core to be user-friendly, appreciating the intuitive interface and straightforward setup process. The inclusion of clear instructions and the interface's compatibility with multiple operating systems made it accessible to a broad range of users. Many users also highlighted the simplicity of the control panel, which facilitated easy navigation and quick adjustments during recording sessions. 20% of users reported challenges with ease of use, primarily due to the complexity of the software and the learning curve associated with mastering the Synergy Core effects. Some users found the interface to be less intuitive than expected, particularly when configuring advanced settings or troubleshooting connectivity issues. These difficulties were more pronounced for users who were new to audio interfaces or digital recording technology. 80% Customer Support 75% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Antelope Audio. They appreciated the prompt and helpful responses from the support team, which often resolved their queries and issues efficiently. Users also valued the availability of detailed online resources, including FAQs and tutorials, which complemented the support team's assistance. 25% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the customer support experience, citing delays in response times and a lack of comprehensive solutions to more complex technical issues. Some users felt that the support provided was not as personalized or thorough as they had hoped, leading to frustration, especially when dealing with urgent technical difficulties that impeded their workflow. 75% Software Integration 88% of users reported positive experiences with the software integration capabilities of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They found the interface to be highly compatible with a variety of DAWs and appreciated the seamless integration of Synergy Core effects, which enhanced their creative process. Users particularly valued the ease with which they could incorporate the interface into their existing setups, facilitating smooth transitions between projects. 12% of users faced challenges with software integration, mainly related to compatibility issues with certain DAWs or operating systems. Some users encountered difficulties with driver installation or experienced software crashes, which disrupted their recording sessions. These technical hitches were a significant concern for users who needed reliable performance for professional projects. 88% Latency Performance 92% of users were impressed by the low-latency performance of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They appreciated the interface's ability to handle real-time processing without noticeable delays, which was crucial for live recording and monitoring. Users found that the latency-free performance significantly improved their workflow, allowing them to focus on creativity without technical interruptions. 8% of users experienced issues with latency performance, particularly when pushing the interface to its limits with multiple tracks and effects. Some reported occasional glitches or delays during high-demand sessions, which affected their ability to record or mix efficiently. These issues were more pronounced for users with older or less powerful computer systems, who struggled to maintain optimal performance. 92% Portability 70% of users found the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core to be adequately portable for their needs. They appreciated the compact design and USB bus power, which made it convenient for mobile recording setups or travel. Users who frequently moved between studios or locations found the interface to be a practical choice for maintaining high-quality recordings on the go. 30% of users were less satisfied with the portability of the interface, often citing its weight and size as drawbacks for ultra-mobile setups. Some users desired a more lightweight solution that would easily fit into a backpack or small bag. Additionally, the need for a stable power source was a concern for those who required truly portable recording capabilities without relying on mains electricity. 70% Durability 87% of users were pleased with the durability of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They noted the interface's solid construction and high-quality materials, which withstood regular use and transport without significant wear or damage. Many users felt confident in the interface's ability to endure the rigors of daily studio work and occasional travel, emphasizing its reliability over time. 13% of users expressed concerns about the durability of specific components, particularly the knobs and connectors. Some reported that these parts felt fragile or became loose with extended use, raising doubts about the interface's long-term resilience. These users were particularly cautious about handling the interface during transport, fearing potential damage from accidental knocks or drops. 87% Design and Aesthetics 90% of users admired the design and aesthetics of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They appreciated the sleek, modern look and the attention to detail in the interface's layout. Users felt that the stylish design complemented their studio setups and contributed to a professional appearance, making it an attractive addition to their gear collection. 10% of users were less impressed by the design, feeling that the interface prioritized form over function in some areas. A few users found the control layout to be cluttered or less intuitive, which detracted from the overall user experience. These users suggested that a more minimalist design might have improved both usability and visual appeal. 90% Connectivity Options 86% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options provided by the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They appreciated the variety of inputs and outputs, which accommodated a wide range of recording and production setups. Users found that the interface's connectivity versatility allowed them to integrate multiple instruments and devices seamlessly, enhancing their creative possibilities. 14% of users felt limited by the connectivity options, particularly those requiring additional I/O for more complex setups. Some users desired more digital connectivity options, such as additional ADAT ports or MIDI support, to better align with their specific production needs. These limitations were a concern for users who needed more extensive connectivity for large-scale projects. 86% Real-Time Effects Processing 93% of users lauded the real-time effects processing capabilities of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They were impressed by the quality and variety of onboard Synergy Core effects, which enhanced their recordings without taxing their computer's processing power. Users found that the ability to apply effects in real-time added a new dimension to their creative workflow, making it a standout feature of the interface. 7% of users encountered difficulties with real-time effects processing, primarily due to the complexity of the effects management system. Some users found it challenging to navigate the interface's software and adjust settings on the fly, which hindered their ability to utilize the effects efficiently. Additionally, users with specific plugin requirements were disappointed by the limited availability of third-party effects. 93% Compatibility with DAWs 89% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core with various DAWs. They appreciated the seamless integration and minimal setup required to start recording, which facilitated a smooth workflow across different software environments. Users found that the interface's compatibility with popular DAWs made it a versatile choice for diverse production needs. 11% of users faced compatibility challenges, particularly with less common or older DAWs. Some users experienced issues with driver installation or encountered glitches during recording sessions, which disrupted their workflow. These compatibility concerns were particularly frustrating for users who relied on specific software for their projects and needed a reliable interface that worked seamlessly with their existing setup. 89% Expandability 78% of users appreciated the expandability options of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They valued the ability to enhance their setup with additional plugins and effects from the Synergy Core library, which allowed them to tailor the interface to their evolving production needs. Users found that the expandability offered flexibility and growth potential, making it a future-proof investment. 22% of users were disappointed by the expandability options, particularly the limited availability of third-party plugins and effects. Some users felt constrained by the interface's reliance on proprietary technology, which restricted their ability to fully customize their production environment. Additionally, the cost of additional plugins was a concern for users seeking more affordable expansion solutions. 78% Driver Stability 82% of users reported stable driver performance with the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They found that the drivers were reliable and rarely caused crashes or interruptions during recording sessions. Users appreciated the regular updates and support provided by Antelope Audio, which helped maintain driver stability and compatibility with evolving operating systems. 18% of users experienced issues with driver stability, particularly following software updates or when using the interface with certain operating systems. Some users encountered frequent crashes or connectivity problems, which disrupted their workflow and led to frustration. These issues were particularly challenging for users who required consistent performance for professional recording and production tasks. 82% Latency-Free Monitoring 91% of users were highly satisfied with the latency-free monitoring capabilities of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They appreciated the direct monitoring feature, which allowed them to hear their recordings in real-time without any noticeable delay. Users found that this feature significantly improved their recording experience, enabling them to capture performances with precision and confidence. 9% of users encountered challenges with latency-free monitoring, primarily due to configuration issues or specific setup requirements. Some users reported minor delays when using certain effects or plugins, which affected their ability to monitor recordings accurately. These issues were a concern for users who required precise timing and synchronization during complex recording sessions. 91% Firmware Updates 80% of users were satisfied with the process and benefits of firmware updates provided by Antelope Audio. They appreciated the regular updates that improved functionality and addressed bugs, which enhanced the overall performance of the interface. Users found the update process to be straightforward and valued the ongoing support and development from the manufacturer. 20% of users experienced difficulties with firmware updates, citing issues with installation or compatibility. Some users reported that updates occasionally introduced new bugs or affected existing settings, which disrupted their workflow. The need for regular updates was also a concern for users who preferred a more hands-off approach to maintaining their equipment. 80% Power Efficiency 85% of users were pleased with the power efficiency of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They appreciated the USB bus-powered design, which eliminated the need for an external power source and reduced cable clutter. Users found that the interface's power efficiency made it a convenient choice for portable setups and home studios with limited power outlets. 15% of users expressed concerns about power efficiency, particularly when using the interface with high-demand setups or devices. Some users found that the interface required more power than their USB ports could provide, leading to connectivity issues or reduced performance. This was a notable concern for users who relied on laptops or mobile devices for their recording needs. 85% Versatility 88% of users appreciated the versatility of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They found that the interface's wide range of features, including multiple I/O options and real-time effects processing, made it suitable for various recording and production scenarios. Users valued the flexibility to adapt the interface to different genres, projects, and environments, which enhanced their creative possibilities. 12% of users felt that the interface's versatility was limited by its reliance on proprietary technology and specific configurations. Some users desired more flexibility in terms of plugin compatibility and connectivity options, which would have allowed them to tailor the interface more closely to their unique production needs. These limitations were a concern for users who required maximum adaptability for diverse recording setups. 88% User Interface 84% of users found the user interface of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core to be intuitive and easy to navigate. They appreciated the logical layout and straightforward controls, which facilitated quick adjustments and efficient operation. Users particularly valued the clear visual feedback provided by the interface, which enhanced their ability to monitor and manage recordings effectively. 16% of users encountered challenges with the user interface, citing difficulties in accessing advanced settings or managing complex configurations. Some users felt that the interface could benefit from additional customization options or more detailed documentation, which would improve their ability to optimize the interface for specific tasks. These issues were particularly pronounced for users who required precise control over every aspect of their recording and production process. 84% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

82% of users found the purchase value of the Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition to be excellent due to its professional-grade sound quality and robust build. Users appreciated the high-quality preamps and the inclusion of the UAD DSP processing, which allowed them to use top-notch plugins without burdening their computer's CPU.

18% of users felt that the price was relatively high compared to other interfaces in the market, especially for beginners or those who do not require the full suite of features. They also mentioned that the necessity for a Thunderbolt 3 connection added additional costs if their current setup was not compatible.

82%
Quality of Materials

88% of users praised the quality of materials used in the Apollo Solo, highlighting its sturdy construction and premium feel. The metal chassis and high-quality knobs were frequently mentioned as indicators of its durability and longevity, making it a reliable choice for both studio and on-the-go use.

12% of users expressed concerns over the interface's weight, stating that while it added to the durability, it made the device less portable than expected. A few users also mentioned minor issues with knob resistance and the overall tactile feel, which did not meet their personal preferences.

88%
Ease of Use

85% of users found the Apollo Solo easy to set up and use, even for those new to audio interfaces. The intuitive control layout and the straightforward software integration were appreciated, making the transition from setup to recording seamless for most users.

15% of users encountered difficulties with the initial setup, particularly in relation to installing the necessary drivers and software. Those unfamiliar with Thunderbolt technology also faced challenges, which led to frustration during the initial use phase.

85%
Sound Quality

90% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the Apollo Solo. They noted the clarity and depth of recordings, attributing this to the superior preamps and high-quality AD/DA conversion that the device offers, making it a preferred choice for professional-grade audio production.

10% of users were less impressed with the sound quality, feeling that it did not significantly surpass cheaper alternatives. Some users experienced issues with noise interference, which they attributed to external factors rather than the device itself, but it nonetheless affected their satisfaction levels.

90%
Software Integration

83% of users appreciated the seamless software integration, particularly the compatibility with UAD plugins, which greatly enhanced their recording and mixing processes. The Console app was praised for its user-friendly interface and ability to control various parameters with ease.

17% of users experienced difficulties with software compatibility, especially those using older operating systems or non-standard DAWs. Some users reported occasional software glitches and a steep learning curve associated with the UAD ecosystem.

83%
Portability

78% of users found the Apollo Solo to be adequately portable, appreciating its compact size and the convenience of Thunderbolt 3 connectivity, which allowed them to easily move it between different recording environments.

22% of users found the device to be somewhat bulky for a 'portable' interface, and the reliance on Thunderbolt 3 limited its use with mobile devices without additional adapters or accessories.

78%
Customer Support

80% of users reported positive experiences with customer support, noting prompt responses and effective solutions to their queries. The availability of online resources and community forums was also highlighted as a plus.

20% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing long wait times and unhelpful responses as major issues. Some users felt the support team lacked the technical expertise needed to resolve more complex issues.

80%
Durability

87% of users were impressed with the durability of the Apollo Solo, mentioning that the solid build and quality materials gave them confidence in the product's longevity, even with frequent use.

13% of users experienced issues related to durability, such as wear and tear on the knobs or connections, which they felt did not align with the device's premium price tag.

87%
Latency

89% of users praised the low-latency performance of the Apollo Solo, which allowed them to monitor recordings in real-time without noticeable delay. This was particularly beneficial for musicians and producers working in fast-paced environments.

11% of users reported latency issues, primarily when using third-party plugins or when their computer systems were not optimally configured. These cases were often linked to external factors rather than the interface itself.

89%
Compatibility

81% of users found the Apollo Solo to be highly compatible with a wide range of DAWs and operating systems, particularly praising its performance with Mac systems and professional audio software.

19% of users faced compatibility issues, especially those using Windows systems or older versions of software. Some also noted limitations when trying to integrate with certain third-party plugins or hardware.

81%
Aesthetic Design

86% of users appreciated the sleek and modern design of the Apollo Solo, which complemented their studio setups. The intuitive layout and aesthetic appeal were frequently highlighted as contributing to a professional look.

14% of users were less impressed by the design, finding it too simplistic or not in line with their personal style. Some also mentioned that the dark color scheme made it difficult to see controls in low-light environments.

86%
Expandability

75% of users were satisfied with the expandability options available with the Apollo Solo, particularly the ability to integrate with other Universal Audio products and expand their plugin collections.

25% of users felt limited by the lack of additional input/output options and the inability to easily scale up for more complex setups without purchasing additional hardware.

75%
UAD Plugin Access

88% of users valued the access to UAD plugins, which they described as industry-leading tools that significantly enhanced their recording and mixing capabilities. The heritage edition's inclusion of a plugin bundle was particularly appreciated.

12% of users were disappointed with the cost of additional plugins beyond the included bundle, which they felt added to the overall expense of the device. Some also mentioned that the number of plugins included was not sufficient for their needs.

88%
Resource Efficiency

80% of users found the Apollo Solo to be resource-efficient, with its DSP processing offloading plugin demands from their computer's CPU, allowing for smoother performance even on less powerful machines.

20% of users noted that the single DSP core could be limiting when running multiple high-demand plugins simultaneously, which could affect their workflow if they required extensive processing power.

80%
Preamp Quality

91% of users were extremely satisfied with the preamp quality, noting the clean and transparent sound that it delivered. This quality was compared favorably against other interfaces, even those at higher price points.

9% of users expected even higher performance given the cost, and some noted that the preamps did not handle very low or high impedance sources as well as they had hoped.

91%
Connection Stability

84% of users experienced stable connections with the Apollo Solo, praising its reliable performance during recordings without unexpected disconnections or audio dropouts.

16% of users reported issues with connection stability, particularly when using non-certified Thunderbolt 3 cables or hubs, which led to occasional interruptions in their workflow.

84%
Power Supply

79% of users found the bus-powered design of the Apollo Solo convenient, especially for mobile recording setups where minimizing cables and power sources was beneficial.

21% of users were frustrated by the power draw requirements, which could be problematic on certain laptops or when multiple devices were connected, leading to power management issues.

79%
User Manual

82% of users found the user manual to be well-written and comprehensive, providing clear instructions and useful tips for both beginners and experienced users to maximize their use of the Apollo Solo.

18% of users found the manual lacking in detail for more advanced troubleshooting and setup scenarios, which led to reliance on online forums and customer support for additional help.

82%
Recording Flexibility

85% of users appreciated the flexibility offered by the Apollo Solo, including its ability to handle various recording scenarios from vocals to instruments with high fidelity, enhancing their creative output.

15% of users felt restricted by the limited number of inputs and outputs, which constrained their ability to record larger setups or multiple sources simultaneously without additional equipment.

85%
Installation Process

83% of users described the installation process as straightforward, with clear guidance provided by the setup software, allowing them to quickly get started with recording.

17% of users encountered issues during installation, particularly with driver conflicts or software updates, which delayed their ability to use the interface immediately after purchase.

83%

Purchase Value

85% of users felt that the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core Audio Interface offered excellent value for money. They appreciated the combination of high-quality preamps, a versatile range of I/O options, and the inclusion of Synergy Core's real-time effects processing, which made it an attractive package for the price point. Many users highlighted that the audio interface's features often outperformed others in the same price range, making it a worthwhile investment for both home studio enthusiasts and professional musicians.

The remaining 15% of users who were dissatisfied with the purchase value often cited the initial cost as a barrier. Despite recognizing the quality of the product, some users felt that the premium price tag was not justified, especially considering the additional costs associated with purchasing extra plugins or expansions needed for their specific requirements. They believed that while the interface was packed with features, not all users needed them, which made the cost less appealing.

85%
Quality of Materials

90% of users praised the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core for its robust build quality and premium materials. They noted that the interface felt sturdy and well-constructed, which gave them confidence in its durability for long-term use. The sleek design and high-grade components were frequently mentioned as a testament to Antelope's commitment to quality, making it a popular choice among users who prioritize reliability and aesthetics.

10% of users expressed concerns over the quality of materials, mainly focusing on the interface's physical controls. Some users reported issues with knob sensitivity and a lack of tactile feedback, which detracted from the overall user experience. Additionally, a few users felt that the interface's weight and size made it less portable than they had hoped, which was a downside for those needing a mobile recording solution.

90%
Sound Quality

95% of users were extremely satisfied with the sound quality of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They consistently praised the pristine audio clarity, dynamic range, and the exceptional performance of the preamps. Users found that the interface delivered professional-grade sound that enhanced their recording and mixing processes, making it a standout choice for both beginners and experienced audio engineers seeking superior sound fidelity.

A small percentage, 5%, of users were not entirely satisfied with the sound quality, attributing their dissatisfaction to specific use cases where they experienced latency or noise issues. Some users encountered problems when integrating the interface with certain DAWs or plugins, which affected the overall audio quality and hindered their production workflow.

95%
Ease of Use

80% of users found the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core to be user-friendly, appreciating the intuitive interface and straightforward setup process. The inclusion of clear instructions and the interface's compatibility with multiple operating systems made it accessible to a broad range of users. Many users also highlighted the simplicity of the control panel, which facilitated easy navigation and quick adjustments during recording sessions.

20% of users reported challenges with ease of use, primarily due to the complexity of the software and the learning curve associated with mastering the Synergy Core effects. Some users found the interface to be less intuitive than expected, particularly when configuring advanced settings or troubleshooting connectivity issues. These difficulties were more pronounced for users who were new to audio interfaces or digital recording technology.

80%
Customer Support

75% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Antelope Audio. They appreciated the prompt and helpful responses from the support team, which often resolved their queries and issues efficiently. Users also valued the availability of detailed online resources, including FAQs and tutorials, which complemented the support team's assistance.

25% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the customer support experience, citing delays in response times and a lack of comprehensive solutions to more complex technical issues. Some users felt that the support provided was not as personalized or thorough as they had hoped, leading to frustration, especially when dealing with urgent technical difficulties that impeded their workflow.

75%
Software Integration

88% of users reported positive experiences with the software integration capabilities of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They found the interface to be highly compatible with a variety of DAWs and appreciated the seamless integration of Synergy Core effects, which enhanced their creative process. Users particularly valued the ease with which they could incorporate the interface into their existing setups, facilitating smooth transitions between projects.

12% of users faced challenges with software integration, mainly related to compatibility issues with certain DAWs or operating systems. Some users encountered difficulties with driver installation or experienced software crashes, which disrupted their recording sessions. These technical hitches were a significant concern for users who needed reliable performance for professional projects.

88%
Latency Performance

92% of users were impressed by the low-latency performance of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They appreciated the interface's ability to handle real-time processing without noticeable delays, which was crucial for live recording and monitoring. Users found that the latency-free performance significantly improved their workflow, allowing them to focus on creativity without technical interruptions.

8% of users experienced issues with latency performance, particularly when pushing the interface to its limits with multiple tracks and effects. Some reported occasional glitches or delays during high-demand sessions, which affected their ability to record or mix efficiently. These issues were more pronounced for users with older or less powerful computer systems, who struggled to maintain optimal performance.

92%
Portability

70% of users found the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core to be adequately portable for their needs. They appreciated the compact design and USB bus power, which made it convenient for mobile recording setups or travel. Users who frequently moved between studios or locations found the interface to be a practical choice for maintaining high-quality recordings on the go.

30% of users were less satisfied with the portability of the interface, often citing its weight and size as drawbacks for ultra-mobile setups. Some users desired a more lightweight solution that would easily fit into a backpack or small bag. Additionally, the need for a stable power source was a concern for those who required truly portable recording capabilities without relying on mains electricity.

70%
Durability

87% of users were pleased with the durability of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They noted the interface's solid construction and high-quality materials, which withstood regular use and transport without significant wear or damage. Many users felt confident in the interface's ability to endure the rigors of daily studio work and occasional travel, emphasizing its reliability over time.

13% of users expressed concerns about the durability of specific components, particularly the knobs and connectors. Some reported that these parts felt fragile or became loose with extended use, raising doubts about the interface's long-term resilience. These users were particularly cautious about handling the interface during transport, fearing potential damage from accidental knocks or drops.

87%
Design and Aesthetics

90% of users admired the design and aesthetics of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They appreciated the sleek, modern look and the attention to detail in the interface's layout. Users felt that the stylish design complemented their studio setups and contributed to a professional appearance, making it an attractive addition to their gear collection.

10% of users were less impressed by the design, feeling that the interface prioritized form over function in some areas. A few users found the control layout to be cluttered or less intuitive, which detracted from the overall user experience. These users suggested that a more minimalist design might have improved both usability and visual appeal.

90%
Connectivity Options

86% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options provided by the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They appreciated the variety of inputs and outputs, which accommodated a wide range of recording and production setups. Users found that the interface's connectivity versatility allowed them to integrate multiple instruments and devices seamlessly, enhancing their creative possibilities.

14% of users felt limited by the connectivity options, particularly those requiring additional I/O for more complex setups. Some users desired more digital connectivity options, such as additional ADAT ports or MIDI support, to better align with their specific production needs. These limitations were a concern for users who needed more extensive connectivity for large-scale projects.

86%
Real-Time Effects Processing

93% of users lauded the real-time effects processing capabilities of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They were impressed by the quality and variety of onboard Synergy Core effects, which enhanced their recordings without taxing their computer's processing power. Users found that the ability to apply effects in real-time added a new dimension to their creative workflow, making it a standout feature of the interface.

7% of users encountered difficulties with real-time effects processing, primarily due to the complexity of the effects management system. Some users found it challenging to navigate the interface's software and adjust settings on the fly, which hindered their ability to utilize the effects efficiently. Additionally, users with specific plugin requirements were disappointed by the limited availability of third-party effects.

93%
Compatibility with DAWs

89% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core with various DAWs. They appreciated the seamless integration and minimal setup required to start recording, which facilitated a smooth workflow across different software environments. Users found that the interface's compatibility with popular DAWs made it a versatile choice for diverse production needs.

11% of users faced compatibility challenges, particularly with less common or older DAWs. Some users experienced issues with driver installation or encountered glitches during recording sessions, which disrupted their workflow. These compatibility concerns were particularly frustrating for users who relied on specific software for their projects and needed a reliable interface that worked seamlessly with their existing setup.

89%
Expandability

78% of users appreciated the expandability options of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They valued the ability to enhance their setup with additional plugins and effects from the Synergy Core library, which allowed them to tailor the interface to their evolving production needs. Users found that the expandability offered flexibility and growth potential, making it a future-proof investment.

22% of users were disappointed by the expandability options, particularly the limited availability of third-party plugins and effects. Some users felt constrained by the interface's reliance on proprietary technology, which restricted their ability to fully customize their production environment. Additionally, the cost of additional plugins was a concern for users seeking more affordable expansion solutions.

78%
Driver Stability

82% of users reported stable driver performance with the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They found that the drivers were reliable and rarely caused crashes or interruptions during recording sessions. Users appreciated the regular updates and support provided by Antelope Audio, which helped maintain driver stability and compatibility with evolving operating systems.

18% of users experienced issues with driver stability, particularly following software updates or when using the interface with certain operating systems. Some users encountered frequent crashes or connectivity problems, which disrupted their workflow and led to frustration. These issues were particularly challenging for users who required consistent performance for professional recording and production tasks.

82%
Latency-Free Monitoring

91% of users were highly satisfied with the latency-free monitoring capabilities of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They appreciated the direct monitoring feature, which allowed them to hear their recordings in real-time without any noticeable delay. Users found that this feature significantly improved their recording experience, enabling them to capture performances with precision and confidence.

9% of users encountered challenges with latency-free monitoring, primarily due to configuration issues or specific setup requirements. Some users reported minor delays when using certain effects or plugins, which affected their ability to monitor recordings accurately. These issues were a concern for users who required precise timing and synchronization during complex recording sessions.

91%
Firmware Updates

80% of users were satisfied with the process and benefits of firmware updates provided by Antelope Audio. They appreciated the regular updates that improved functionality and addressed bugs, which enhanced the overall performance of the interface. Users found the update process to be straightforward and valued the ongoing support and development from the manufacturer.

20% of users experienced difficulties with firmware updates, citing issues with installation or compatibility. Some users reported that updates occasionally introduced new bugs or affected existing settings, which disrupted their workflow. The need for regular updates was also a concern for users who preferred a more hands-off approach to maintaining their equipment.

80%
Power Efficiency

85% of users were pleased with the power efficiency of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They appreciated the USB bus-powered design, which eliminated the need for an external power source and reduced cable clutter. Users found that the interface's power efficiency made it a convenient choice for portable setups and home studios with limited power outlets.

15% of users expressed concerns about power efficiency, particularly when using the interface with high-demand setups or devices. Some users found that the interface required more power than their USB ports could provide, leading to connectivity issues or reduced performance. This was a notable concern for users who relied on laptops or mobile devices for their recording needs.

85%
Versatility

88% of users appreciated the versatility of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core. They found that the interface's wide range of features, including multiple I/O options and real-time effects processing, made it suitable for various recording and production scenarios. Users valued the flexibility to adapt the interface to different genres, projects, and environments, which enhanced their creative possibilities.

12% of users felt that the interface's versatility was limited by its reliance on proprietary technology and specific configurations. Some users desired more flexibility in terms of plugin compatibility and connectivity options, which would have allowed them to tailor the interface more closely to their unique production needs. These limitations were a concern for users who required maximum adaptability for diverse recording setups.

88%
User Interface

84% of users found the user interface of the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core to be intuitive and easy to navigate. They appreciated the logical layout and straightforward controls, which facilitated quick adjustments and efficient operation. Users particularly valued the clear visual feedback provided by the interface, which enhanced their ability to monitor and manage recordings effectively.

16% of users encountered challenges with the user interface, citing difficulties in accessing advanced settings or managing complex configurations. Some users felt that the interface could benefit from additional customization options or more detailed documentation, which would improve their ability to optimize the interface for specific tasks. These issues were particularly pronounced for users who required precise control over every aspect of their recording and production process.

84%

Pros:
High-quality audio conversion and preamps. Real-time UAD processing with SOLO Core. Compact and portable design. Includes a bundle of UAD plug-ins. Low-latency performance with Thunderbolt 3 connectivity. Robust build quality.	High-quality AD/DA converters for superior audio clarity. Compact and portable design, ideal for mobile recording. Onboard Synergy Core FX processing reduces CPU load. Multiple connectivity options including USB and Thunderbolt. Low-latency performance suitable for real-time monitoring.

Cons:
Limited to SOLO Core processing, which may not be sufficient for larger projects. Relatively high price for entry-level users. Requires a Thunderbolt 3 connection, which may not be available on all systems. Only two analog inputs, which might be limiting for some users. UAD plug-ins can be expensive.	Higher price point compared to some other interfaces in its class. Requires external power supply, limiting true portability. Initial setup and software installation can be complex. Limited number of physical inputs and outputs.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 4 Outputs at 192 kHz	Analog: 2 Inputs / 6 Outputs Digital: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	2 Preamps
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)	2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output (DC-Coupled) 1x Stereo RCA Coaxial Unbalanced Monitor Output 2x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C (Class-Compliant)
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.14 macOS 10.15 macOS 11 macOS 12 Windows 10 (64-Bit Only) Windows 11	macOS Windows
Power Requirements
Thunderbolt Bus Power	USB Bus Power

The Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core Audio Interface offers a versatile I/O configuration with 2 Analog Inputs and 6 Outputs, along with 2 Digital Inputs and 2 Outputs. It supports a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-Bit, providing high-resolution audio capabilities. This interface features 2 Microphone Preamps and a variety of analog audio connectivity options, including 2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs, 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Outputs, and 2x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Outputs.Show More

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 4 Outputs at 192 kHz	Analog: 2 Inputs / 6 Outputs Digital: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs
Built-In DSP
Yes	Yes
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	2 Preamps
Built-In Microphone

Input Level Adjustment
1x Knob	1x Knob
Expansion Slots

When comparing the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core Audio Interface and the Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition, both devices offer impressive specifications tailored for audio professionals. Both interfaces feature 2 inputs and 6 outputs for the Antelope Zen Go and 2 inputs and 4 outputs for the Apollo Solo, allowing flexibility in routing audio signals. They both support a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz and 24-bit resolution, ensuring high-quality audio recording and playback.Show More

Signal Processing
Pad
Mic: -20 dB (Switchable per Channel)
Gain/Trim Range
Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs: +10 dB to +65 dB	Mic Inputs: 65 dB
High-Pass Filter
75 Hz, 12 dB/Octave
Solo/Mute

The Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core Audio Interface and the Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition both offer unique specifications that cater to different audio recording needs. The Zen Go features a gain/trim range of 65 dB for its mic inputs, allowing for high sensitivity when capturing vocals and instruments. However, it lacks a pad feature, which might limit its versatility in handling loud sound sources. Additionally, there is no high-pass filter included, which could affect the ability to manage low-frequency noise during recordings.Show More

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)	2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output (DC-Coupled) 1x Stereo RCA Coaxial Unbalanced Monitor Output 2x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Phantom Power
48 V, Selectable On/Off (Selectable on Individual Inputs)	48 V, Selectable On/Off (Selectable on Individual Inputs)
Digital Audio I/O
	1x RCA Coaxial S/PDIF Input 1x RCA Coaxial S/PDIF Output
Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C (Class-Compliant)
Host Connection Protocol
Thunderbolt 3	USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)
	1x USB-C (Device Charging)
Sync I/O

Network I/O

MIDI I/O

The Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core Audio Interface features a comprehensive analog audio I/O configuration with 2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs, allowing for versatile recording options. It also includes 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Outputs and 1x Stereo RCA Coaxial Unbalanced Monitor Output, alongside 2x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Outputs on the front panel. The interface supports 48 V Phantom Power that is selectable for individual inputs, enhancing its usability with various microphones. For digital audio connectivity, it offers 1x RCA Coaxial S/PDIF Input and 1x RCA Coaxial S/PDIF Output, and connects to hosts via USB-C (Class-Compliant) using the USB 2.0 protocol.Show More

Performance
Maximum Input Level
Mic Inputs: +25.2 dBu (Min Gain, with Pad) Line Inputs: +20.7 dBu Hi-Z Inputs: +12.5 dBu (Min Gain)	Mic Inputs: +20 dBu
Maximum Output Level
Monitor Outputs: +20.7 dBu	Monitor Outputs: +20 dBu
Dynamic Range
Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs: 118 dBA Monitor Outputs: 115 dBA Headphone Outputs: 115 dBA (600-Ohm Load)	Mic Inputs: 121 dB (A-Weighted) A/D Converters: 120 dB D/A Converters: 127 dB (A-Weighted)
THD+N
Mic Inputs: -108 dBFS Line Inputs: -107 dBFS Hi-Z Inputs: -105 dBFS Monitor Outputs: -106 dBFS Headphone Outputs: -97 dB (600-Ohm Load) -88 dB (32-Ohm Load)	A/D Converters: -100 dB D/A Converters: -115 dB

When comparing the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core Audio Interface and the Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition Desktop 2x4 Thunderbolt 3 Audio Interface, several key specifications highlight their differences in performance and functionality. The maximum input level for the Zen Go is +20 dBu for mic inputs, while the Apollo Solo offers a slightly higher input level of +25.2 dBu when using mic inputs with a pad engaged. This gives the Apollo a slight edge in handling louder sound sources.Show More

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
Up to 192 kHz	44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 / 176.4 / 192 kHz
Sample Rate Conversion

Bit Depths
24-Bit	24-Bit (AD/DA Conversion) 64-Bit (Clocking)
Sync Sources
Internal	Internal, S/PDIF

When comparing the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core Audio Interface and the Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition, both devices support a maximum sample rate of up to 192 kHz. The Antelope Zen Go offers a wider range of selectable sample rates including 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, 176.4, and 192 kHz, while the Apollo Solo also supports up to 192 kHz but does not specify the additional sample rates available.Show More

Audio Storage & Playback
Memory Card Slot

The Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core Audio Interface and the Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition Desktop 2x4 Thunderbolt 3 Audio Interface are both high-quality audio interfaces designed for professional recording and production. One notable feature of both devices is that they do not come with a memory card slot, which means users will need to rely on their computer storage for recording and processing audio. This aspect may be a consideration for those who prefer the convenience of portable memory solutions.Show More

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.14 macOS 10.15 macOS 11 macOS 12 Windows 10 (64-Bit Only) Windows 11	macOS Windows
Mobile Device Compatibility

Required Hardware
Available Thunderbolt 3 Port Thunderbolt 3 Cable	Available USB-C Port USB Cable (Included)
Internet Connection
Required for Registration, Software/Driver Download, Plug-In Authorization	Required for Registration, Software/Driver Download, Plug-In Authorization

The Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core Audio Interface and the Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition are two high-performance audio interfaces catering to different user needs. In terms of OS Compatibility, the Zen Go supports both macOS and Windows, while the Apollo Solo is compatible with macOS 10.14, 10.15, 11, 12 and Windows 10 (64-Bit Only), Windows 11. The broader OS support of the Zen Go makes it appealing for users working across various platforms.Show More

Power
Power Requirements
Thunderbolt Bus Power	USB Bus Power

The Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core Audio Interface is designed for users who prefer the convenience of USB Bus Power. This allows for easy connectivity and portability, as it can be powered directly from a computer's USB port without the need for an external power source. This feature is particularly beneficial for mobile recording setups or for musicians who frequently work in different locations.Show More

Physical
Dimensions
7.1 x 4.8 x 1.8" / 18.03 x 12.19 x 4.57 cm	7.8 x 4.6 x 2.26" / 19.8 x 11.7 x 5.75 cm
Weight
1.4 lb / 0.6 kg	1.5 lb / 0.7 kg

When comparing the Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core Audio Interface and the Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition Desktop 2x4 Thunderbolt 3 Audio Interface, both devices offer robust features for audio professionals, yet they cater to different needs and preferences. The Antelope Zen Go measures 7.8 x 4.6 x 2.26 inches and weighs 1.5 lb, making it slightly larger and heavier than the Apollo Solo, which has dimensions of 7.1 x 4.8 x 1.8 inches and weighs 1.4 lb. This size difference may impact portability, with the Apollo Solo being marginally more compact.Show More

Packaging Info
Package Weight
2.79 lb	2.325 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
8.5 x 6.4 x 4.6"	9.9 x 7.1 x 3.7"

The Antelope Zen Go Synergy Core Audio Interface and the Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition are both compact audio interfaces designed for high-quality sound recording and processing. The Zen Go weighs 2.325 lb and has box dimensions of 9.9 x 7.1 x 3.7 inches, making it a lightweight and portable option for musicians and audio engineers on the go. In contrast, the Apollo Solo is slightly heavier at 2.79 lb and features smaller box dimensions of 8.5 x 6.4 x 4.6 inches, making it a bit denser and potentially more space-efficient on a desktop setup.Show More