Audient EVO 4 vs Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen): USB-C Audio Interface Showdown

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface are both popular choices for musicians, podcasters, and home studio enthusiasts, yet they cater to slightly different needs and preferences.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen) is known for its high-quality audio performance and user-friendly design. It features two upgraded Scarlett mic preamps with Air mode, which adds brightness and clarity to vocal recordings. The unit also includes high-headroom instrument inputs, allowing for clean recordings of guitars and other instruments. With a 24-bit/192kHz resolution, the Scarlett 2i2 ensures professional-grade sound quality. The 4th generation also introduces Auto Gain, Clip Safe, and a dynamic range improvement, making it easier to get the perfect recording levels. Its rugged metal chassis and compact size make it a durable and portable option for on-the-go recording.
On the other hand, the Audient EVO 4 is celebrated for its innovative and intuitive design. It offers two EVO preamps with Smartgain technology, which automatically sets the gain levels for you, simplifying the recording process for beginners and professionals alike. The EVO 4 also supports 24-bit/96kHz resolution, delivering excellent audio quality. One standout feature is its JFET instrument input, which provides a rich, warm sound when recording guitars. The interface includes a large volume knob and one-touch controls for easy navigation, along with a sleek, modern design. Additionally, the EVO 4 offers loopback functionality, making it ideal for podcasters and streamers who need to record computer audio along with their microphone inputs.
Both interfaces are USB-C compatible, ensuring fast and reliable connectivity with modern computers. The choice between them often comes down to specific needs: the Scarlett 2i2 is perfect for users who prioritize traditional high-quality preamps and a robust build, while the EVO 4 appeals to those who appreciate smart features and a user-friendly experience. Ultimately, both devices are excellent investments for those looking to enhance their recording capabilities.

Comprehensive Specifications, Advantages, and Disadvantages

Audient EVO 4

Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation)

Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation)

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 85% of users found the purchase value of the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface to be excellent. They praised its affordability compared to other interfaces offering similar quality and features. The combination of professional-grade sound and user-friendly interface made the EVO 4 a worthwhile investment for both beginners and experienced users. 15% of users felt dissatisfied, mainly due to expectations of more advanced features at a similar price point. Some users compared it to higher-tier audio interfaces and found the EVO 4 lacking in certain premium functionalities. 85% Quality of Materials 80% of users appreciated the build quality of the Audient EVO 4, noting its sturdy construction and durability. The materials used in its design were considered robust, ensuring longevity and consistent performance over time. 20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the materials, describing them as feeling somewhat 'plasticky' or less premium than expected. These users anticipated a more metallic finish and felt the interface could be more resistant to wear and tear. 80% Ease of Use 90% of users lauded the EVO 4 for its ease of use, highlighting the intuitive layout and straightforward setup process. The Smartgain feature was particularly praised for simplifying the recording process, making it accessible even for those new to audio interfaces. 10% of users found the learning curve steeper than anticipated, especially when integrating the device with certain DAWs or when seeking to maximize its potential features. This minority felt that initial setup instructions could be more comprehensive. 90% Sound Quality 92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality delivered by the Audient EVO 4. They noted the clarity and precision in audio capture, attributing these qualities to the high-quality preamps and converters. The interface was often compared favorably to more expensive models. 8% of users expressed dissatisfaction, pointing out occasional background noise or interference in specific recording environments. These users expected a completely noise-free experience and suggested that the noise floor could be improved. 92% Portability 88% of users were pleased with the portability of the EVO 4, finding its compact design and lightweight nature perfect for mobile recording setups. This portability was a major plus for users who needed to work in various locations. 12% of users felt the interface could be even more compact for easier transport in smaller bags or cases. Additionally, some mentioned that while the device was portable, the accompanying cables could be more travel-friendly. 88% Driver Stability 82% of users reported stable and reliable performance from the EVO 4's drivers, noting minimal dropouts or latency issues during recording sessions. The drivers were generally easy to install and provided consistent results across different systems. 18% of users encountered stability issues, such as occasional disconnections or compatibility problems with specific operating systems. These users suggested improvements in firmware updates to address these concerns. 82% Customer Support 78% of users found the customer support for Audient products, including the EVO 4, to be responsive and helpful. Many appreciated the prompt responses and effective solutions provided by the support team. 22% of users were dissatisfied, citing slow response times and unresolved issues. Some users felt that the support team could be more knowledgeable about technical problems specific to the EVO 4. 78% Design Aesthetics 86% of users appreciated the sleek and modern design of the EVO 4. The minimalist aesthetic and easy-to-read controls were particularly appealing, making the interface a visually attractive addition to any studio setup. 14% of users were less impressed with the design, finding it somewhat plain or lacking distinctive features that make it stand out. They suggested more customizable options or color variations to enhance its visual appeal. 86% Feature Set 84% of users were satisfied with the feature set of the EVO 4, especially the innovative Smartgain function and loopback capabilities. These features were highly valued by podcasters and streamers for their convenience and functionality. 16% of users felt that the feature set could be expanded. Some expected additional inputs or outputs and more advanced routing options, which they believed would enhance the interface's versatility and appeal. 84% Integration with DAWs 87% of users reported seamless integration of the EVO 4 with various DAWs, highlighting the ease of setting up and using the interface with popular software like Ableton Live and Logic Pro. The compatibility across multiple platforms was a significant benefit. 13% of users faced challenges with DAW integration, noting occasional issues with recognition or configuration settings. These users suggested that more detailed guidance or tutorials could assist in resolving such problems. 87% Latency 89% of users were happy with the low latency performance of the EVO 4, praising its ability to deliver real-time monitoring without noticeable delay. This capability was crucial for live recording and streaming applications. 11% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older systems or during high-demand tasks. They recommended optimization options or settings adjustments to further reduce latency. 89% Durability 81% of users felt confident in the durability of the EVO 4, mentioning the solid construction and resilience of the device under regular use. This durability was a key factor in their positive long-term experience. 19% of users questioned the device's longevity, citing concerns over the durability of knobs and connectors. They suggested improvements in the build quality of these components to enhance overall durability. 81% Setup Process 88% of users found the setup process of the EVO 4 straightforward and quick, allowing them to start recording within minutes. The simplicity of connecting and configuring the device was a major convenience for users. 12% of users experienced difficulties during setup, often related to driver installation or configuration with their computer systems. They recommended clearer instructions or more detailed setup guides to assist new users. 88% Headphone Output Quality 85% of users praised the quality of the headphone output, noting the clear and accurate sound reproduction. This aspect was particularly important for monitoring and mixing tasks. 15% of users felt the headphone output could be improved, mentioning issues like insufficient volume levels or slight distortion at higher volumes. They suggested enhancements to the amplifier quality for better performance. 85% Microphone Preamp Quality 91% of users were impressed with the microphone preamp quality, which provided clean and transparent sound capture with minimal noise. This feature was highly valued by musicians and vocalists for its professional-level performance. 9% of users were less satisfied, citing specific instances of noise or interference in certain environments. They suggested that further refinement in preamp design could mitigate these issues. 91% USB-C Connectivity 93% of users appreciated the USB-C connectivity, which ensured fast data transfer and reliable power delivery. This modern connection standard was a key advantage for users with newer devices. 7% of users encountered connectivity issues, often related to incompatible cables or ports. They recommended clearer compatibility information and potentially including a USB-C to USB-A adapter. 93% Loopback Functionality 86% of users found the loopback functionality of the EVO 4 extremely useful, especially for podcasting and live streaming. This feature allowed for easy routing of audio from different sources, enhancing the flexibility of the interface. 14% of users struggled with configuring loopback settings, experiencing difficulties in achieving the desired audio routing. They suggested more detailed instructions or user support for this feature. 86% Compatibility with Operating Systems 84% of users were satisfied with the operating system compatibility of the EVO 4, highlighting its smooth operation on both Windows and macOS platforms. The plug-and-play nature was a significant convenience for many users. 16% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with Linux systems or during updates to newer OS versions. They recommended expanding support and providing more frequent driver updates. 84% Control Knob Functionality 82% of users valued the functionality of the control knob, which allowed for precise adjustments and easy navigation of settings. The tactile feel and responsiveness were often highlighted as positive aspects. 18% of users felt the control knob could be improved, noting occasional issues with responsiveness or durability. They suggested enhancements to the knob's design for a smoother user experience. 82% Overall Satisfaction 88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Audient EVO 4, citing its combination of high-quality sound, user-friendly features, and reliable performance as key factors in their positive experience. The interface met or exceeded expectations for most users. 12% of users were less satisfied overall, often due to specific issues like driver stability or feature limitations that impacted their experience. They recommended addressing these concerns to improve the product's appeal. 88%	Purchase Value 85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the balance between affordability and functionality, making it an excellent choice for both beginners and professionals. Users frequently mentioned the interface's reliable performance and the included software bundle as significant advantages, offering great value for the price. 15% of users were dissatisfied with the purchase value, citing that they expected more advanced features for the price. Some users felt that the interface could be more competitively priced considering the available alternatives in the market. 85% Quality of Materials 90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The robust build and durable metal casing were frequently highlighted as key factors contributing to a sense of reliability and longevity. Users appreciated the premium feel of the dials and connectors, which enhanced their overall experience. 10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of materials, noting that some components felt slightly less durable over time. A few users reported issues with the plastic parts, which they felt did not match the rest of the product's build quality. 90% Ease of Use 88% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface easy to use. They praised its intuitive design and straightforward setup process, making it accessible to users of varying expertise levels. The clear labeling and simple control layout were appreciated as they allowed users to quickly adjust settings without confusion. 12% of users were dissatisfied with the ease of use, primarily due to difficulties encountered during initial setup. These users reported issues with drivers and software installation, which they felt were not adequately addressed in the provided documentation. 88% Sound Quality 92% of users were impressed with the sound quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, noting its clear and crisp audio output as a standout feature. Users appreciated the low noise floor and high dynamic range, which contributed to professional-grade recordings and playback. 8% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, mentioning occasional latency issues and minor distortion at high volumes. Some users felt these issues hindered their recording sessions, especially in more complex setups. 92% Compatibility 87% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing its seamless integration with various DAWs and operating systems as a major advantage. Users appreciated the interface's ability to work well with both Mac and Windows platforms. 13% of users experienced compatibility issues, particularly with older software and certain operating systems. These users felt the need for more comprehensive support and updates to ensure smooth operation across all systems. 87% Portability 85% of users praised the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, highlighting its compact size and lightweight design. This made it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions or gigs, which was a significant plus for users frequently on the move. 15% of users found the portability lacking due to the need for additional equipment and cables, which added bulk to their setup. Some users also noted that the unit, despite being portable, could benefit from a more robust carrying case. 85% Durability 88% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often commenting on its sturdy construction. Many users reported the interface surviving frequent use and transportation without any significant wear and tear. 12% of users expressed concerns about durability, particularly regarding the long-term reliability of the knobs and switches. Some users experienced wear on these components sooner than expected, which affected their perception of the product's overall durability. 88% Aesthetics 90% of users were pleased with the aesthetics of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often mentioning its sleek and modern design. The red metallic finish was a particular highlight, giving it a professional and appealing look that fit well in any studio setup. 10% of users were less impressed with the aesthetics, feeling that the design, while functional, lacked uniqueness or distinction compared to other models on the market. Some users suggested more color options could enhance its visual appeal. 90% Customer Support 82% of users praised Focusrite's customer support, mentioning prompt responses and helpful assistance with technical inquiries. Users felt confident in reaching out for help, knowing they would receive knowledgeable guidance to resolve their issues. 18% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses and unhelpful troubleshooting advice. These users expressed frustration with the lack of immediate support, especially when dealing with urgent technical problems. 82% Latency 89% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found it capable of handling real-time monitoring and recording without noticeable delays, which was crucial for professional audio work. 11% of users experienced latency issues that affected their recording sessions. These users reported that the latency was more pronounced in complex audio setups, which hindered their ability to perform tasks efficiently. 89% Driver Stability 83% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The majority of users reported consistent performance with minimal crashes or connectivity issues, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions. 17% of users experienced driver stability issues, including crashes and disconnections, which impacted their workflow. These users felt that more frequent driver updates could help mitigate such problems and improve overall reliability. 83% Preamp Quality 91% of users were highly satisfied with the preamp quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted the clean and transparent sound the preamps provided, which allowed for accurate capture of vocals and instruments without coloration. 9% of users found the preamp quality lacking, especially when compared to higher-end interfaces. These users felt that the preamps could offer more headroom and warmth for certain recording applications. 91% Software Bundle 86% of users appreciated the software bundle included with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the DAW and plugin offerings to be a valuable addition that enhanced their recording and production capabilities right out of the box. 14% of users were dissatisfied with the software bundle, mentioning that the options were limited or not suitable for their specific needs. Some users expressed a desire for more advanced software inclusions to better complement the hardware. 86% Input/Output Options 84% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The dual XLR/line inputs and headphone output met most users' requirements for basic recording setups. 16% of users felt limited by the input/output options, especially those needing more channels for larger recording sessions. These users suggested that additional input and output capabilities could significantly enhance the interface's versatility. 84% Phantom Power 87% of users appreciated the inclusion of phantom power on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, enabling them to use condenser microphones effectively. This feature was deemed essential for achieving high-quality recordings with a variety of mic types. 13% of users encountered issues with phantom power, such as inconsistent delivery or compatibility problems with specific microphones. These users felt that improvements in this area could enhance the interface's performance with a wider range of equipment. 87% USB-C Connectivity 89% of users were pleased with the USB-C connectivity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Audio Interface, noting the faster data transfer and improved power efficiency. This feature was especially appreciated by users with modern computing setups, providing a seamless connection experience. 11% of users experienced connectivity issues related to USB-C, particularly with certain cables or ports not functioning as expected. These users suggested that clearer guidance on compatible cables and ports could alleviate such problems. 89% Overall Satisfaction 88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing it as a reliable and high-performance tool for their audio needs. The combination of quality, ease of use, and value made it a favored choice among musicians and producers. 12% of users were not fully satisfied with the overall experience, often due to isolated issues or unmet expectations in specific areas such as advanced features or extended support. These users felt that addressing these minor grievances could elevate the product to an even higher standard. 88% Recording Quality 91% of users were highly satisfied with the recording quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted its ability to capture detailed and accurate audio, making it suitable for various applications from podcasts to music production. 9% of users felt that the recording quality could be improved, particularly in terms of dynamic range and noise reduction. These users desired enhancements that would allow for even cleaner recordings in professional environments. 91% Monitor Control 86% of users appreciated the monitor control features of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, particularly the direct monitor switch and volume control. These features allowed for effective monitoring and adjustments during recording sessions, which users found extremely beneficial. 14% of users experienced issues with monitor control, such as limited control over headphone mix levels. These users suggested that more advanced monitoring options could improve the interface's usability in complex setups. 86% Updates and Support 80% of users were satisfied with the updates and support provided for the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the ongoing driver updates and support resources available, which helped maintain the interface's performance over time. 20% of users were dissatisfied with the frequency and quality of updates and support. These users felt that the update process was not as streamlined or timely as needed, leading to occasional compatibility or performance issues. 80% Product Longevity 87% of users were satisfied with the product longevity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, reporting that it remained functional and reliable over extended periods of use. This aspect contributed to users' confidence in their investment. 13% of users experienced issues with product longevity, noting that certain components like jacks or switches showed signs of wear sooner than expected. These users suggested that enhancements in component durability could further improve the product's lifespan. 87% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

85% of users found the purchase value of the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface to be excellent. They praised its affordability compared to other interfaces offering similar quality and features. The combination of professional-grade sound and user-friendly interface made the EVO 4 a worthwhile investment for both beginners and experienced users.

15% of users felt dissatisfied, mainly due to expectations of more advanced features at a similar price point. Some users compared it to higher-tier audio interfaces and found the EVO 4 lacking in certain premium functionalities.

85%
Quality of Materials

80% of users appreciated the build quality of the Audient EVO 4, noting its sturdy construction and durability. The materials used in its design were considered robust, ensuring longevity and consistent performance over time.

20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the materials, describing them as feeling somewhat 'plasticky' or less premium than expected. These users anticipated a more metallic finish and felt the interface could be more resistant to wear and tear.

80%
Ease of Use

90% of users lauded the EVO 4 for its ease of use, highlighting the intuitive layout and straightforward setup process. The Smartgain feature was particularly praised for simplifying the recording process, making it accessible even for those new to audio interfaces.

10% of users found the learning curve steeper than anticipated, especially when integrating the device with certain DAWs or when seeking to maximize its potential features. This minority felt that initial setup instructions could be more comprehensive.

90%
Sound Quality

92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality delivered by the Audient EVO 4. They noted the clarity and precision in audio capture, attributing these qualities to the high-quality preamps and converters. The interface was often compared favorably to more expensive models.

8% of users expressed dissatisfaction, pointing out occasional background noise or interference in specific recording environments. These users expected a completely noise-free experience and suggested that the noise floor could be improved.

92%
Portability

88% of users were pleased with the portability of the EVO 4, finding its compact design and lightweight nature perfect for mobile recording setups. This portability was a major plus for users who needed to work in various locations.

12% of users felt the interface could be even more compact for easier transport in smaller bags or cases. Additionally, some mentioned that while the device was portable, the accompanying cables could be more travel-friendly.

88%
Driver Stability

82% of users reported stable and reliable performance from the EVO 4's drivers, noting minimal dropouts or latency issues during recording sessions. The drivers were generally easy to install and provided consistent results across different systems.

18% of users encountered stability issues, such as occasional disconnections or compatibility problems with specific operating systems. These users suggested improvements in firmware updates to address these concerns.

82%
Customer Support

78% of users found the customer support for Audient products, including the EVO 4, to be responsive and helpful. Many appreciated the prompt responses and effective solutions provided by the support team.

22% of users were dissatisfied, citing slow response times and unresolved issues. Some users felt that the support team could be more knowledgeable about technical problems specific to the EVO 4.

78%
Design Aesthetics

86% of users appreciated the sleek and modern design of the EVO 4. The minimalist aesthetic and easy-to-read controls were particularly appealing, making the interface a visually attractive addition to any studio setup.

14% of users were less impressed with the design, finding it somewhat plain or lacking distinctive features that make it stand out. They suggested more customizable options or color variations to enhance its visual appeal.

86%
Feature Set

84% of users were satisfied with the feature set of the EVO 4, especially the innovative Smartgain function and loopback capabilities. These features were highly valued by podcasters and streamers for their convenience and functionality.

16% of users felt that the feature set could be expanded. Some expected additional inputs or outputs and more advanced routing options, which they believed would enhance the interface's versatility and appeal.

84%
Integration with DAWs

87% of users reported seamless integration of the EVO 4 with various DAWs, highlighting the ease of setting up and using the interface with popular software like Ableton Live and Logic Pro. The compatibility across multiple platforms was a significant benefit.

13% of users faced challenges with DAW integration, noting occasional issues with recognition or configuration settings. These users suggested that more detailed guidance or tutorials could assist in resolving such problems.

87%
Latency

89% of users were happy with the low latency performance of the EVO 4, praising its ability to deliver real-time monitoring without noticeable delay. This capability was crucial for live recording and streaming applications.

11% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older systems or during high-demand tasks. They recommended optimization options or settings adjustments to further reduce latency.

89%
Durability

81% of users felt confident in the durability of the EVO 4, mentioning the solid construction and resilience of the device under regular use. This durability was a key factor in their positive long-term experience.

19% of users questioned the device's longevity, citing concerns over the durability of knobs and connectors. They suggested improvements in the build quality of these components to enhance overall durability.

81%
Setup Process

88% of users found the setup process of the EVO 4 straightforward and quick, allowing them to start recording within minutes. The simplicity of connecting and configuring the device was a major convenience for users.

12% of users experienced difficulties during setup, often related to driver installation or configuration with their computer systems. They recommended clearer instructions or more detailed setup guides to assist new users.

88%
Headphone Output Quality

85% of users praised the quality of the headphone output, noting the clear and accurate sound reproduction. This aspect was particularly important for monitoring and mixing tasks.

15% of users felt the headphone output could be improved, mentioning issues like insufficient volume levels or slight distortion at higher volumes. They suggested enhancements to the amplifier quality for better performance.

85%
Microphone Preamp Quality

91% of users were impressed with the microphone preamp quality, which provided clean and transparent sound capture with minimal noise. This feature was highly valued by musicians and vocalists for its professional-level performance.

9% of users were less satisfied, citing specific instances of noise or interference in certain environments. They suggested that further refinement in preamp design could mitigate these issues.

91%
USB-C Connectivity

93% of users appreciated the USB-C connectivity, which ensured fast data transfer and reliable power delivery. This modern connection standard was a key advantage for users with newer devices.

7% of users encountered connectivity issues, often related to incompatible cables or ports. They recommended clearer compatibility information and potentially including a USB-C to USB-A adapter.

93%
Loopback Functionality

86% of users found the loopback functionality of the EVO 4 extremely useful, especially for podcasting and live streaming. This feature allowed for easy routing of audio from different sources, enhancing the flexibility of the interface.

14% of users struggled with configuring loopback settings, experiencing difficulties in achieving the desired audio routing. They suggested more detailed instructions or user support for this feature.

86%
Compatibility with Operating Systems

84% of users were satisfied with the operating system compatibility of the EVO 4, highlighting its smooth operation on both Windows and macOS platforms. The plug-and-play nature was a significant convenience for many users.

16% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with Linux systems or during updates to newer OS versions. They recommended expanding support and providing more frequent driver updates.

84%
Control Knob Functionality

82% of users valued the functionality of the control knob, which allowed for precise adjustments and easy navigation of settings. The tactile feel and responsiveness were often highlighted as positive aspects.

18% of users felt the control knob could be improved, noting occasional issues with responsiveness or durability. They suggested enhancements to the knob's design for a smoother user experience.

82%
Overall Satisfaction

88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Audient EVO 4, citing its combination of high-quality sound, user-friendly features, and reliable performance as key factors in their positive experience. The interface met or exceeded expectations for most users.

12% of users were less satisfied overall, often due to specific issues like driver stability or feature limitations that impacted their experience. They recommended addressing these concerns to improve the product's appeal.

88%

Purchase Value

85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the balance between affordability and functionality, making it an excellent choice for both beginners and professionals. Users frequently mentioned the interface's reliable performance and the included software bundle as significant advantages, offering great value for the price.

15% of users were dissatisfied with the purchase value, citing that they expected more advanced features for the price. Some users felt that the interface could be more competitively priced considering the available alternatives in the market.

85%
Quality of Materials

90% of users were satisfied with the quality of materials used in the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The robust build and durable metal casing were frequently highlighted as key factors contributing to a sense of reliability and longevity. Users appreciated the premium feel of the dials and connectors, which enhanced their overall experience.

10% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of materials, noting that some components felt slightly less durable over time. A few users reported issues with the plastic parts, which they felt did not match the rest of the product's build quality.

90%
Ease of Use

88% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface easy to use. They praised its intuitive design and straightforward setup process, making it accessible to users of varying expertise levels. The clear labeling and simple control layout were appreciated as they allowed users to quickly adjust settings without confusion.

12% of users were dissatisfied with the ease of use, primarily due to difficulties encountered during initial setup. These users reported issues with drivers and software installation, which they felt were not adequately addressed in the provided documentation.

88%
Sound Quality

92% of users were impressed with the sound quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, noting its clear and crisp audio output as a standout feature. Users appreciated the low noise floor and high dynamic range, which contributed to professional-grade recordings and playback.

8% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, mentioning occasional latency issues and minor distortion at high volumes. Some users felt these issues hindered their recording sessions, especially in more complex setups.

92%
Compatibility

87% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing its seamless integration with various DAWs and operating systems as a major advantage. Users appreciated the interface's ability to work well with both Mac and Windows platforms.

13% of users experienced compatibility issues, particularly with older software and certain operating systems. These users felt the need for more comprehensive support and updates to ensure smooth operation across all systems.

87%
Portability

85% of users praised the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, highlighting its compact size and lightweight design. This made it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions or gigs, which was a significant plus for users frequently on the move.

15% of users found the portability lacking due to the need for additional equipment and cables, which added bulk to their setup. Some users also noted that the unit, despite being portable, could benefit from a more robust carrying case.

85%
Durability

88% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often commenting on its sturdy construction. Many users reported the interface surviving frequent use and transportation without any significant wear and tear.

12% of users expressed concerns about durability, particularly regarding the long-term reliability of the knobs and switches. Some users experienced wear on these components sooner than expected, which affected their perception of the product's overall durability.

88%
Aesthetics

90% of users were pleased with the aesthetics of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, often mentioning its sleek and modern design. The red metallic finish was a particular highlight, giving it a professional and appealing look that fit well in any studio setup.

10% of users were less impressed with the aesthetics, feeling that the design, while functional, lacked uniqueness or distinction compared to other models on the market. Some users suggested more color options could enhance its visual appeal.

90%
Customer Support

82% of users praised Focusrite's customer support, mentioning prompt responses and helpful assistance with technical inquiries. Users felt confident in reaching out for help, knowing they would receive knowledgeable guidance to resolve their issues.

18% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses and unhelpful troubleshooting advice. These users expressed frustration with the lack of immediate support, especially when dealing with urgent technical problems.

82%
Latency

89% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found it capable of handling real-time monitoring and recording without noticeable delays, which was crucial for professional audio work.

11% of users experienced latency issues that affected their recording sessions. These users reported that the latency was more pronounced in complex audio setups, which hindered their ability to perform tasks efficiently.

89%
Driver Stability

83% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The majority of users reported consistent performance with minimal crashes or connectivity issues, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions.

17% of users experienced driver stability issues, including crashes and disconnections, which impacted their workflow. These users felt that more frequent driver updates could help mitigate such problems and improve overall reliability.

83%
Preamp Quality

91% of users were highly satisfied with the preamp quality of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted the clean and transparent sound the preamps provided, which allowed for accurate capture of vocals and instruments without coloration.

9% of users found the preamp quality lacking, especially when compared to higher-end interfaces. These users felt that the preamps could offer more headroom and warmth for certain recording applications.

91%
Software Bundle

86% of users appreciated the software bundle included with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the DAW and plugin offerings to be a valuable addition that enhanced their recording and production capabilities right out of the box.

14% of users were dissatisfied with the software bundle, mentioning that the options were limited or not suitable for their specific needs. Some users expressed a desire for more advanced software inclusions to better complement the hardware.

86%
Input/Output Options

84% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. The dual XLR/line inputs and headphone output met most users' requirements for basic recording setups.

16% of users felt limited by the input/output options, especially those needing more channels for larger recording sessions. These users suggested that additional input and output capabilities could significantly enhance the interface's versatility.

84%
Phantom Power

87% of users appreciated the inclusion of phantom power on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, enabling them to use condenser microphones effectively. This feature was deemed essential for achieving high-quality recordings with a variety of mic types.

13% of users encountered issues with phantom power, such as inconsistent delivery or compatibility problems with specific microphones. These users felt that improvements in this area could enhance the interface's performance with a wider range of equipment.

87%
USB-C Connectivity

89% of users were pleased with the USB-C connectivity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Audio Interface, noting the faster data transfer and improved power efficiency. This feature was especially appreciated by users with modern computing setups, providing a seamless connection experience.

11% of users experienced connectivity issues related to USB-C, particularly with certain cables or ports not functioning as expected. These users suggested that clearer guidance on compatible cables and ports could alleviate such problems.

89%
Overall Satisfaction

88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, citing it as a reliable and high-performance tool for their audio needs. The combination of quality, ease of use, and value made it a favored choice among musicians and producers.

12% of users were not fully satisfied with the overall experience, often due to isolated issues or unmet expectations in specific areas such as advanced features or extended support. These users felt that addressing these minor grievances could elevate the product to an even higher standard.

88%
Recording Quality

91% of users were highly satisfied with the recording quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They noted its ability to capture detailed and accurate audio, making it suitable for various applications from podcasts to music production.

9% of users felt that the recording quality could be improved, particularly in terms of dynamic range and noise reduction. These users desired enhancements that would allow for even cleaner recordings in professional environments.

91%
Monitor Control

86% of users appreciated the monitor control features of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, particularly the direct monitor switch and volume control. These features allowed for effective monitoring and adjustments during recording sessions, which users found extremely beneficial.

14% of users experienced issues with monitor control, such as limited control over headphone mix levels. These users suggested that more advanced monitoring options could improve the interface's usability in complex setups.

86%
Updates and Support

80% of users were satisfied with the updates and support provided for the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the ongoing driver updates and support resources available, which helped maintain the interface's performance over time.

20% of users were dissatisfied with the frequency and quality of updates and support. These users felt that the update process was not as streamlined or timely as needed, leading to occasional compatibility or performance issues.

80%
Product Longevity

87% of users were satisfied with the product longevity of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface, reporting that it remained functional and reliable over extended periods of use. This aspect contributed to users' confidence in their investment.

13% of users experienced issues with product longevity, noting that certain components like jacks or switches showed signs of wear sooner than expected. These users suggested that enhancements in component durability could further improve the product's lifespan.

87%

Pros:
High-quality preamps with 58dB gain range. Smartgain feature for automatic level adjustment. Compact and portable design. USB-C connectivity for fast data transfer. Low latency performance. User-friendly interface with LED metering.	High-quality preamps for clear audio capture. USB-C connectivity for faster data transfer and compatibility. Compact and portable design. Low latency monitoring. Easy setup and user-friendly interface.

Cons:
Limited to two input channels. Plastic construction may feel less durable. No MIDI input/output. Requires USB-C compatible devices for optimal performance.	Limited to two inputs, which may not be enough for some users. No MIDI input/output. Higher price point compared to some competitors. Requires external power when used with some devices.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 96 kHz	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	2
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.7.5 or Later Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit) 6 or Later	macOS Windows
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface both offer essential features for high-quality audio recording and production, but they differ in some key specifications and capabilities.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 boasts a higher maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit resolution, compared to the 96 kHz at 24-bit resolution of the Audient EVO 4. This gives the Scarlett 2i2 a slight edge in terms of potential audio fidelity and detail. Both interfaces offer 2 analog inputs and 2 outputs, but the Scarlett 2i2's inputs are distinctly categorized: it features 2 XLR 3-pin balanced mic inputs and 2 1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced line/Hi-Z inputs on the front panel. In contrast, the Audient EVO 4 integrates 2 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line inputs and a single 1/4" TS unbalanced Hi-Z input.
For outputs, each interface provides 2x 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs and a 1/4" TRS headphone output. However, the Scarlett 2i2's headphone output is balanced, potentially offering better sound quality compared to the unbalanced headphone output on the EVO 4.
Both interfaces are equipped with a USB-C host connection, ensuring compatibility with modern computers. The Scarlett 2i2 is compatible with both macOS and Windows without specifying version limitations, while the EVO 4 supports macOS 10.7.5 or later and Windows 7 or later (32-/64-bit).
Power requirements for both devices are met through USB bus power, but the Scarlett 2i2 also mentions the option for a USB power adapter (not included), providing an alternative power source if needed.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers higher maximum sampling rates and more defined input types, whereas the Audient EVO 4 provides versatile combo inputs and broader OS compatibility. Both interfaces are robust options for audio recording and production, catering to different priorities and workflows.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 96 kHz	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	2
Input Level Adjustment
2x Automatic 1x Knob	2x Knob
Expansion Slots

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface share several similarities but also exhibit key differences in their specifications. Both devices offer 2 analog inputs and 2 analog outputs, making them suitable for a variety of audio recording and playback needs. Additionally, they both support USB-C connectivity, ensuring fast and reliable data transfer.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 stands out with its higher maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit, compared to the Audient EVO 4's maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz at 24-bit. This higher sampling rate in the Scarlett 2i2 can provide superior audio fidelity, which may be crucial for users requiring the highest possible sound quality. Both interfaces feature 2 microphone inputs; however, Focusrite does not specify if these are preamps, whereas the Audient EVO 4 explicitly states the presence of 2 preamps.
In terms of input level adjustment, the Scarlett 2i2 uses 2 dedicated knobs for manual adjustment, offering precise control over input levels. The Audient EVO 4, on the other hand, incorporates 2 automatic level adjustment features along with 1 manual knob, providing a blend of convenience and control that may appeal to users who prefer a more streamlined setup process.
Neither the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 nor the Audient EVO 4 includes built-in DSP or expansion slots, which means that users will need to rely on external software or hardware for additional processing capabilities and cannot expand their interface's functionality through expansion cards. The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 also does not have a built-in microphone, a specification shared with the Audient EVO 4.
Overall, while both audio interfaces offer comparable basic functionality, the Scarlett 2i2's higher sampling rate and manual input level adjustments may appeal to users seeking more traditional and high-fidelity recording capabilities. In contrast, the Audient EVO 4's automatic level adjustments and integrated preamps provide a modern, user-friendly approach that might be more attractive to those looking for ease of use.

Signal Processing
Gain/Trim Range
Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs: 58 dB	Mic/Line Inputs: Up to +69 dB Hi-Z Inputs: 62 dB

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface offer distinct features tailored to different user needs. Comparing their gain/trim range, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 provides a broader range with mic/line inputs offering up to +69 dB and Hi-Z inputs at 62 dB. In contrast, the Audient EVO 4's mic/line/Hi-Z inputs offer a gain/trim range of 58 dB, which, while sufficient for many applications, is narrower than that of the Scarlett 2i2.
Examining the additional features, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 does not include specifications for a pad, high-pass filter, or specific solo/mute functionalities. On the other hand, the Audient EVO 4 clearly states the absence of a pad and high-pass filter. However, it compensates with a convenient mute feature available per input channel and for the master, enabling users to control their audio inputs and outputs more dynamically.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) excels with its higher gain/trim range, catering to users requiring more flexibility in their input levels, while the Audient EVO 4 provides essential mute functionality and a straightforward interface, despite its lower gain/trim range and absence of pad and high-pass filter features.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Phantom Power
48 V ± 4 V, Selectable On/Off (Selectable on Individual Inputs)	48 V, Selectable On/Off
Digital Audio I/O

Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0	USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)
	1x USB-C (Power Input)
Sync I/O

Network I/O

MIDI I/O

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface are both highly-regarded options in the realm of audio interfaces, but they offer distinct features catering to different needs.
Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation)
Analog Audio I/O: The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 features 2x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Inputs and 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Inputs on the front panel, which allows for versatile input options. Additionally, it includes 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Outputs and a 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output on the front panel, designed for clear monitoring and headphone use.
Phantom Power: It provides 48 V phantom power, which is selectable on or off, suitable for powering condenser microphones.
Digital Audio I/O: The Scarlett 2i2 does not feature digital audio I/O options.
Host Connection: It connects to the host via 1x USB-C, following the USB 2.0 protocol. It also includes an additional USB-C port specifically for power input.
Additional I/O: The Scarlett 2i2 does not include Sync I/O, Network I/O, or MIDI I/O capabilities, and does not support wireless connections.
Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface
Analog Audio I/O: The Audient EVO 4 offers 2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Inputs, providing flexibility for using both microphone and line-level signals. It also has a dedicated 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input for instruments. For monitoring, it includes 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Outputs and a 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output.
Phantom Power: The EVO 4 provides 48 V phantom power with a ±4 V variance, which is selectable on or off individually for each input, offering greater control over power distribution to connected microphones.
Digital Audio I/O: Similar to the Scarlett 2i2, the EVO 4 does not feature digital audio I/O capabilities.
Host Connection: The EVO 4 also connects to the host via 1x USB-C using the USB 2.0 protocol. Unlike the Scarlett 2i2, it does not have an additional USB-C port for power input.
Additional I/O: The EVO 4 does not include Sync I/O, Network I/O, or MIDI I/O capabilities, and does not support wireless connections.
In summary, both the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) and the Audient EVO 4 offer robust, USB-C connected audio interface solutions with selectable 48 V phantom power and solid analog audio I/O configurations. The Scarlett 2i2 stands out with its dedicated USB-C power input and a higher number of balanced/unbalanced inputs, while the EVO 4 boasts individual phantom power control for each input and a dedicated Hi-Z input, catering to slightly different user preferences and needs.

Performance
Frequency Response
Mic Inputs: 10 Hz to 40 kHz ±0.5 dB Line, Hi-Z Inputs: 10 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.5 dB A/D Converters: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB D/A Converters: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB Headphone Outputs: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB	XLR Mic Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB 1/4" Line Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.05 dB 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.15 dB
Maximum Input Level
Mic Inputs: +16 dBu Hi-Z Inputs: +10 dBu	XLR Mic: 16 dBu 1/4" Line: 22 dBu 1/4" Hi-Z: 12 dBu
Maximum Output Level
D/A Converters: +11 dBu	1/4" Line: +16 dBu
Headphone Output Power
45 mW into 30 Ohms (Max) 52 mW into 60 Ohms (Max) 20 mW into 600 Ohms (Max)	1/4": 32 mW into 33 Ohms 22 mW into 300 Ohms
Impedance
Mic Inputs: > 3 Kilohms (Balanced) Line Inputs: > 10 Kilohms (Balanced) Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohm (Unbalanced)	XLR Mic Inputs: 3 Kilohms 1/4" Line Inputs: 60 Kilohms 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohms 1/4" Line Outputs: 100 Ohms 1/4" Headphone Outputs: < 50 Ohm
Dynamic Range
AD/DA Converters: 113 dBA	XLR Mic Inputs: 116 dBA 1/4" Line Inputs: 115.2 dBA 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 113 dBA 1/4" Line Outputs: 120 dB 1/4" Headphone: 112 dB (at 33 Ohms) 115 dB (at 300 Ohms) Digital A/D Converters: 120 dB Digital D/A Converters: 130 dBA
THD+N
A/D Converters: < 0.001% (1 kHz, at -1 dBFS) D/A Converters: < 0.0015% (1 kHz, at -1 dBFS) Headphone Outputs: < 0.0015% (1 kHz, at -1 dBFS) Hi-Z Inputs: < 0.3% (1 kHz) Mic/Line Inputs: < 0.0015% (1 kHz)	XLR Mic Inputs: -100 dB (at 8 dB Gain) 1/4" Line Inputs: -100 dB (at 8 dB Gain) 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: -80 dB (at Minimum Gain) 1/4" Line Outputs: -109 dB 1/4" Headphone Outputs: -99 dB (at 33 Ohms) -108 dB (at 300 Ohms) Digital A/D Converters: -110 dB Digital D/A Converters: -115 dB
EIN
Mic/Line Inputs: < -128 dB	XLR Mic Inputs: -127 dBu A-Weighted

When comparing the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface, several key features stand out, particularly in terms of frequency response, input/output levels, headphone output power, impedance, dynamic range, THD+N, and EIN.
Frequency Response: The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers a frequency response from 20 Hz to 20 kHz across its XLR Mic, 1/4" Line, and 1/4" Hi-Z inputs with minimal deviation. The Audient EVO 4 extends this range, providing a frequency response from 10 Hz to 40 kHz for its mic inputs and 10 Hz to 20 kHz for line and Hi-Z inputs, with a slightly higher deviation of ±0.5 dB.
Maximum Input and Output Levels: The Scarlett 2i2 has a maximum input level of 16 dBu for XLR Mic, 22 dBu for 1/4" Line, and 12 dBu for 1/4" Hi-Z inputs, while its maximum output level on the 1/4" Line outputs is +16 dBu. The EVO 4 matches the maximum input level for mic inputs at +16 dBu but has a slightly lower maximum input level of +10 dBu for Hi-Z inputs. Its maximum output level for D/A converters is +11 dBu, which is lower than the Scarlett's output level.
Headphone Output Power: The headphone output power is significantly different between the two devices. The Scarlett 2i2 provides 32 mW into 33 Ohms and 22 mW into 300 Ohms, while the EVO 4 offers 45 mW into 30 Ohms, 52 mW into 60 Ohms, and 20 mW into 600 Ohms, making the EVO 4 more versatile for different headphone impedances.
Impedance: Both interfaces have similar impedance features, with the Scarlett 2i2 offering 3 Kilohms for XLR Mic Inputs, 60 Kilohms for 1/4" Line Inputs, and 1 Megohm for 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs. The Audient EVO 4’s mic inputs have over 3 Kilohms (balanced), line inputs over 10 Kilohms (balanced), and Hi-Z inputs at 1 Megohm (unbalanced).
Dynamic Range: The Scarlett 2i2 exhibits a higher dynamic range across its components, with 116 dBA for XLR Mic Inputs, 115.2 dBA for 1/4" Line Inputs, and 113 dBA for 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs. The Audient EVO 4 has a dynamic range of 113 dBA for its AD/DA converters.
THD+N: The Scarlett 2i2 shows very low THD+N values, with -100 dB for XLR Mic and 1/4" Line Inputs and -80 dB for 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs. The EVO 4 has exceptionally low THD+N values as well, with < 0.001% for A/D converters, < 0.0015% for D/A converters, and < 0.3% for Hi-Z inputs.
EIN: Both interfaces have impressive Equivalent Input Noise (EIN) values, with the Scarlett 2i2 having -127 dBu A-Weighted for XLR Mic Inputs and the EVO 4 having < -128 dB for Mic/Line Inputs.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 excels in dynamic range and low THD+N values, while the Audient EVO 4 offers a broader frequency response and higher headphone output power. Both interfaces present excellent impedance and EIN values, making them strong contenders in the USB-C audio interface market.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
Up to 96 kHz	44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 / 176.4 / 192 kHz
Bit Depths
Up to 24-Bit	24-Bit
Sync Sources
Internal	Internal

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface both offer high-quality audio performance but differ in a few key areas.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 supports a wide range of sample rates, including 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, 176.4, and 192 kHz, providing greater flexibility for various recording needs. It operates at a 24-bit depth, ensuring high-resolution audio capture. The Scarlett 2i2 uses internal sync sources, making it suitable for standalone use without requiring external synchronization.
In comparison, the Audient EVO 4 offers sample rates up to 96 kHz, which is sufficient for most professional and home studio applications but does not reach as high as the Scarlett 2i2. Like the Scarlett, the EVO 4 also operates at up to 24-bit depth, providing high-quality audio resolution. Additionally, the EVO 4 features internal sync sources and offers low latency performance, with 5 ms at 44.1 kHz and 4.1 ms at 96 kHz, depending on the buffer size, which is crucial for real-time monitoring and recording.
Both interfaces are designed to be user-friendly and portable, with USB-C connectivity ensuring fast and reliable data transfer. However, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 stands out with its broader range of sample rates, making it a more versatile choice for users who require higher sample rate options. On the other hand, the Audient EVO 4's low latency performance and clear dBFS reference levels for inputs and outputs make it an excellent choice for those who prioritize minimal delay and precise audio level management.

Audio Storage & Playback

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.7.5 or Later Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit) 6 or Later	macOS Windows

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface each offer distinct features that cater to different user needs.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) is compatible with both macOS and Windows operating systems. Additionally, it offers mobile app compatibility specifically for iPadOS. This makes it a versatile choice for users who switch between desktop and mobile setups, especially those who utilize iPads in their workflow.
In contrast, the Audient EVO 4 provides compatibility with a broader range of operating systems. It supports macOS 10.7.5 or later and Windows 7 or later (both 32-bit and 64-bit), as well as iOS 6 or later. This broader OS compatibility might be more appealing for users with older systems or those who need flexibility across various devices.
When it comes to hardware requirements, the Audient EVO 4 specifies that it needs a Mac with an Intel processor and a PC with at least a 1.6 GHz Intel Core 2 or AMD processor. It also requires 1 GB of RAM, an available USB 2.0 port, and an internet connection for registration and software/driver downloads. This detailed specification list ensures that users are well-informed about the necessary system capabilities to optimize the use of the EVO 4.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) stands out for its iPadOS compatibility, making it a good fit for mobile users. On the other hand, the Audient EVO 4 offers a broader range of OS compatibility and detailed hardware requirements, catering to a variety of system configurations and ensuring users have the necessary resources for optimal performance.

Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface both cater to the needs of musicians and podcasters looking for reliable audio interfaces with high-quality sound. However, they differ in their power requirements, which can impact their usability in various recording setups.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) offers flexibility in its power options. It can be powered via USB bus power, which is convenient for mobile recording setups and eliminates the need for an external power source. Additionally, it supports a USB power adapter (not included) and an AC/DC power adapter with a requirement of 5 VDC at 900 mA. This versatility allows users to choose between relying on their computer's USB port or using an external power source, which can provide more stable power and potentially improve performance in demanding recording situations. The Scarlett 2i2 has a power consumption of 4.5 W, ensuring efficient energy use while maintaining high-quality audio performance.
In contrast, the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface simplifies the power setup by solely relying on USB bus power. This makes the EVO 4 highly portable and easy to use, as it does not require any additional power adapters or sources. Users can simply connect it to their computer via USB-C, and it will draw the necessary power directly from the USB connection. This streamlined approach is particularly beneficial for those who need a quick and hassle-free setup, especially in mobile recording environments or for users with limited access to power outlets.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Generation) provides greater flexibility in power options, accommodating both USB bus power and external power adapters, whereas the Audient EVO 4 focuses on simplicity and portability with its exclusive reliance on USB bus power. The choice between these two interfaces may come down to the user's specific needs for flexibility and convenience in their recording setup.

Physical
Dimensions
5.51 x 2.64 x 2.64" / 14 x 6.71 x 6.71 cm	7.1 x 4.6 x 1.87" / 18 x 11.7 x 4.75 cm
Weight
12.7 oz / 360.0 g	1.3 lb / 595.0 g

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) measures 7.1 x 4.6 x 1.87 inches (18 x 11.7 x 4.75 cm) and weighs 1.3 lbs (595.0 g). This makes it slightly larger and heavier compared to the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface, which has dimensions of 5.51 x 2.64 x 2.64 inches (14 x 6.71 x 6.71 cm) and a weight of 12.7 oz (360.0 g).
In terms of portability, the Audient EVO 4 stands out due to its more compact size and lighter weight, making it more convenient for mobile recording setups or for those who frequently travel with their audio interface. On the other hand, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2, while slightly bulkier, still remains highly portable and offers robust build quality that can be beneficial in various recording environments.
Both interfaces employ USB-C connectivity, ensuring fast data transfer and compatibility with modern devices. However, the choice between these two might come down to factors such as size preference, weight considerations, and specific feature sets offered by each interface.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
1.29 lb	1.9 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
6.8 x 3.85 x 3.55"	8.2 x 7 x 2.6"

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface are both highly regarded audio interfaces, but they differ in several key aspects.
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 weighs 1.9 lb and has box dimensions of 8.2 x 7 x 2.6 inches. This indicates a slightly larger and heavier build compared to the Audient EVO 4, which has a package weight of 1.29 lb and more compact box dimensions of 6.8 x 3.85 x 3.55 inches. The Scarlett 2i2's additional weight and size might suggest a more robust construction, potentially offering a more substantial feel.
Both interfaces utilize USB-C connectivity, ensuring fast and reliable data transfer. However, the Scarlett 2i2's larger footprint may offer more physical space for additional or more spaciously arranged controls, which could be an advantage for users who prefer a more tactile interface.
In terms of packaging, the Scarlett 2i2's dimensions indicate a more extensive package, possibly containing more accessories or more protective packaging. The Audient EVO 4's compact dimensions and lighter weight make it more portable and easier to fit into tight spaces, which could be beneficial for mobile recording setups or users with limited desk space.
In summary, while the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers a slightly larger and heavier package that might imply a more durable build and potentially more included accessories, the Audient EVO 4 provides a more compact and lightweight alternative that is easier to transport and manage in smaller spaces.