Audient EVO 4 vs Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen): A Comprehensive Comparison

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface are two highly regarded options in the realm of audio interfaces, each bringing its unique features and benefits to the table.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Gen stands out with its exceptional preamps, offering ultra-low noise and high headroom, making it an excellent choice for musicians and home studio enthusiasts. Its two-input configuration includes a high-quality mic preamp with a switchable Air mode, which adds brightness and presence to recordings, and an instrument input designed to handle high-level pickups. This interface is known for its robust build quality, intuitive design, and seamless integration with popular DAWs, ensuring a smooth workflow for users. The Scarlett Solo also boasts 24-bit/192kHz converters, ensuring pristine audio quality, and it comes bundled with a comprehensive software package, including Ableton Live Lite and a suite of Focusrite’s plug-ins.
On the other hand, the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface is celebrated for its innovative features and user-friendly design. One of its standout features is the Smartgain function, which automatically sets the appropriate gain levels for your inputs, removing the guesswork and ensuring optimal recording levels. The EVO 4 also includes two EVO mic preamps, renowned for their clean and transparent sound, and JFET instrument inputs that preserve the natural tone of your instruments. Additionally, the loopback functionality allows for easy capture of computer audio, making it ideal for podcasters and streamers. The EVO 4 supports 24-bit/96kHz audio resolution, providing excellent sound quality, and its compact, modern design makes it a versatile and portable option for creators on the go.
In summary, both the Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Gen and the Audient EVO 4 offer high-quality audio performance tailored to different user needs. The Scarlett Solo excels with its superior preamps and comprehensive software bundle, catering to musicians and home studio setups. Meanwhile, the EVO 4’s Smartgain feature, loopback functionality, and portable design make it a compelling choice for podcasters, streamers, and musicians looking for ease of use and versatility.

Specifications, Advantages, and Disadvantages of Audient EVO 4 and Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen)

Audient EVO 4

Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation)

Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation)

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 85% of users found the purchase value of the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface to be excellent. They praised its affordability compared to other interfaces offering similar quality and features. The combination of professional-grade sound and user-friendly interface made the EVO 4 a worthwhile investment for both beginners and experienced users. 15% of users felt dissatisfied, mainly due to expectations of more advanced features at a similar price point. Some users compared it to higher-tier audio interfaces and found the EVO 4 lacking in certain premium functionalities. 85% Quality of Materials 80% of users appreciated the build quality of the Audient EVO 4, noting its sturdy construction and durability. The materials used in its design were considered robust, ensuring longevity and consistent performance over time. 20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the materials, describing them as feeling somewhat 'plasticky' or less premium than expected. These users anticipated a more metallic finish and felt the interface could be more resistant to wear and tear. 80% Ease of Use 90% of users lauded the EVO 4 for its ease of use, highlighting the intuitive layout and straightforward setup process. The Smartgain feature was particularly praised for simplifying the recording process, making it accessible even for those new to audio interfaces. 10% of users found the learning curve steeper than anticipated, especially when integrating the device with certain DAWs or when seeking to maximize its potential features. This minority felt that initial setup instructions could be more comprehensive. 90% Sound Quality 92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality delivered by the Audient EVO 4. They noted the clarity and precision in audio capture, attributing these qualities to the high-quality preamps and converters. The interface was often compared favorably to more expensive models. 8% of users expressed dissatisfaction, pointing out occasional background noise or interference in specific recording environments. These users expected a completely noise-free experience and suggested that the noise floor could be improved. 92% Portability 88% of users were pleased with the portability of the EVO 4, finding its compact design and lightweight nature perfect for mobile recording setups. This portability was a major plus for users who needed to work in various locations. 12% of users felt the interface could be even more compact for easier transport in smaller bags or cases. Additionally, some mentioned that while the device was portable, the accompanying cables could be more travel-friendly. 88% Driver Stability 82% of users reported stable and reliable performance from the EVO 4's drivers, noting minimal dropouts or latency issues during recording sessions. The drivers were generally easy to install and provided consistent results across different systems. 18% of users encountered stability issues, such as occasional disconnections or compatibility problems with specific operating systems. These users suggested improvements in firmware updates to address these concerns. 82% Customer Support 78% of users found the customer support for Audient products, including the EVO 4, to be responsive and helpful. Many appreciated the prompt responses and effective solutions provided by the support team. 22% of users were dissatisfied, citing slow response times and unresolved issues. Some users felt that the support team could be more knowledgeable about technical problems specific to the EVO 4. 78% Design Aesthetics 86% of users appreciated the sleek and modern design of the EVO 4. The minimalist aesthetic and easy-to-read controls were particularly appealing, making the interface a visually attractive addition to any studio setup. 14% of users were less impressed with the design, finding it somewhat plain or lacking distinctive features that make it stand out. They suggested more customizable options or color variations to enhance its visual appeal. 86% Feature Set 84% of users were satisfied with the feature set of the EVO 4, especially the innovative Smartgain function and loopback capabilities. These features were highly valued by podcasters and streamers for their convenience and functionality. 16% of users felt that the feature set could be expanded. Some expected additional inputs or outputs and more advanced routing options, which they believed would enhance the interface's versatility and appeal. 84% Integration with DAWs 87% of users reported seamless integration of the EVO 4 with various DAWs, highlighting the ease of setting up and using the interface with popular software like Ableton Live and Logic Pro. The compatibility across multiple platforms was a significant benefit. 13% of users faced challenges with DAW integration, noting occasional issues with recognition or configuration settings. These users suggested that more detailed guidance or tutorials could assist in resolving such problems. 87% Latency 89% of users were happy with the low latency performance of the EVO 4, praising its ability to deliver real-time monitoring without noticeable delay. This capability was crucial for live recording and streaming applications. 11% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older systems or during high-demand tasks. They recommended optimization options or settings adjustments to further reduce latency. 89% Durability 81% of users felt confident in the durability of the EVO 4, mentioning the solid construction and resilience of the device under regular use. This durability was a key factor in their positive long-term experience. 19% of users questioned the device's longevity, citing concerns over the durability of knobs and connectors. They suggested improvements in the build quality of these components to enhance overall durability. 81% Setup Process 88% of users found the setup process of the EVO 4 straightforward and quick, allowing them to start recording within minutes. The simplicity of connecting and configuring the device was a major convenience for users. 12% of users experienced difficulties during setup, often related to driver installation or configuration with their computer systems. They recommended clearer instructions or more detailed setup guides to assist new users. 88% Headphone Output Quality 85% of users praised the quality of the headphone output, noting the clear and accurate sound reproduction. This aspect was particularly important for monitoring and mixing tasks. 15% of users felt the headphone output could be improved, mentioning issues like insufficient volume levels or slight distortion at higher volumes. They suggested enhancements to the amplifier quality for better performance. 85% Microphone Preamp Quality 91% of users were impressed with the microphone preamp quality, which provided clean and transparent sound capture with minimal noise. This feature was highly valued by musicians and vocalists for its professional-level performance. 9% of users were less satisfied, citing specific instances of noise or interference in certain environments. They suggested that further refinement in preamp design could mitigate these issues. 91% USB-C Connectivity 93% of users appreciated the USB-C connectivity, which ensured fast data transfer and reliable power delivery. This modern connection standard was a key advantage for users with newer devices. 7% of users encountered connectivity issues, often related to incompatible cables or ports. They recommended clearer compatibility information and potentially including a USB-C to USB-A adapter. 93% Loopback Functionality 86% of users found the loopback functionality of the EVO 4 extremely useful, especially for podcasting and live streaming. This feature allowed for easy routing of audio from different sources, enhancing the flexibility of the interface. 14% of users struggled with configuring loopback settings, experiencing difficulties in achieving the desired audio routing. They suggested more detailed instructions or user support for this feature. 86% Compatibility with Operating Systems 84% of users were satisfied with the operating system compatibility of the EVO 4, highlighting its smooth operation on both Windows and macOS platforms. The plug-and-play nature was a significant convenience for many users. 16% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with Linux systems or during updates to newer OS versions. They recommended expanding support and providing more frequent driver updates. 84% Control Knob Functionality 82% of users valued the functionality of the control knob, which allowed for precise adjustments and easy navigation of settings. The tactile feel and responsiveness were often highlighted as positive aspects. 18% of users felt the control knob could be improved, noting occasional issues with responsiveness or durability. They suggested enhancements to the knob's design for a smoother user experience. 82% Overall Satisfaction 88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Audient EVO 4, citing its combination of high-quality sound, user-friendly features, and reliable performance as key factors in their positive experience. The interface met or exceeded expectations for most users. 12% of users were less satisfied overall, often due to specific issues like driver stability or feature limitations that impacted their experience. They recommended addressing these concerns to improve the product's appeal. 88%	Purchase Value 85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation). Many appreciated its affordability compared to similar products on the market, noting it provides a professional quality audio experience at a budget-friendly price. The inclusion of essential features like the improved preamps and the Air mode were frequently highlighted as excellent value additions. 15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to expectations of more features that are available in higher-priced models. Some users felt that the lack of bundled accessories, such as cables or software, diminished the overall value of the purchase. 85% Quality of Material 90% of users found the quality of material to be excellent. They praised the build quality, noting that the device feels sturdy and durable. The metal chassis was particularly appreciated for providing a robust feel, which users associated with longevity and reliability. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of material. Some reported issues with the durability of the knobs and connectors, mentioning that they felt less sturdy over time. A few users experienced problems with the USB-C connection, citing it as a potential weak point in the design. 90% Ease of Use 88% of users were satisfied with the ease of use of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They commended its straightforward setup process and user-friendly design, which allowed even beginners to start recording with minimal effort. The clear labeling and intuitive layout were also frequently praised. 12% of users found the device less user-friendly than expected. Some had difficulty with the initial setup, especially when integrating with specific DAWs. Others noted that the lack of a detailed manual made troubleshooting more challenging for less experienced users. 88% Sound Quality 92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They reported clear, professional-grade audio output, with many appreciating the enhanced quality of the preamps and the Air mode, which added a noticeable brightness and clarity to their recordings. 8% of users were not fully satisfied with the sound quality. Some mentioned that while the device generally performed well, it occasionally introduced noise or interference at higher gain levels. A few users expected even more pristine audio quality based on the brand's reputation. 92% Connectivity 87% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the USB-C interface for its modern, fast, and reliable connection. Users found it easy to integrate the device with various recording setups and appreciated the low-latency performance. 13% of users faced issues with connectivity. Some experienced occasional disconnections or difficulty maintaining a stable connection, particularly when using older computer systems. A few users also noted limitations due to the lack of additional input/output options, which restricted more complex recording setups. 87% Software Integration 83% of users were pleased with the software integration capabilities of the Scarlett Solo. Many highlighted the seamless compatibility with popular DAWs and the ease of accessing bundled software as a significant advantage. 17% of users encountered challenges with software integration. Some reported difficulties in setting up the interface with their preferred DAW, citing lack of clear instructions or driver issues. Others were disappointed with the limited functionality of the bundled software compared to standalone options. 83% Portability 89% of users appreciated the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. Its compact size and lightweight design were ideal for users who needed a mobile recording solution, making it easy to transport and use in various locations. 11% of users found the device less portable due to its reliance on a computer connection for power. Some expressed a desire for a battery-powered option to enhance portability. Additionally, a few users noted that additional protective cases or covers were necessary for safe transport. 89% Durability 91% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its solid construction and the high-quality materials used, which gave them confidence in its long-term performance and resistance to wear and tear. 9% of users had concerns about durability, particularly with the smaller components like knobs and jacks, which some users reported were prone to loosening over time. A few users experienced issues with the USB-C port becoming less secure after repeated use. 91% Aesthetic Design 93% of users were highly satisfied with the aesthetic design of the Scarlett Solo. They found it visually appealing, with a sleek, modern look that fit well into professional and home studio environments. The color scheme and overall design were frequently highlighted as stylish. 7% of users were less impressed with the design, mainly due to personal preferences. Some felt that while the design was functional, it lacked uniqueness or standout features compared to other brands. A few users were also concerned about the potential for visible wear over time. 93% Customer Support 84% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Focusrite. Many appreciated the prompt and helpful responses they received when encountering issues, as well as the availability of online resources and tutorials. 16% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing long wait times and unhelpful responses in some cases. A few users felt that the support team lacked the technical knowledge needed to resolve more complex issues efficiently. 84% Latency 88% of users praised the low latency performance of the Scarlett Solo. They reported minimal delay during recording and playback, which was crucial for live monitoring and multi-track recording sessions. 12% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older or less powerful computers. Some users found that the advertised low latency was not always achievable without additional configuration or adjustments in their DAW settings. 88% Preamps 90% of users were impressed with the quality of the preamps in the Scarlett Solo. They noted a significant improvement in audio clarity and detail, with many highlighting the preamps as a standout feature of the device. 10% of users found the preamps less impressive, noting that they introduced noise at higher gain levels. Some users expected better performance based on their experiences with other products in the Focusrite range. 90% Driver Stability 86% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Scarlett Solo. They reported consistent performance and reliability across different operating systems, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions. 14% of users encountered issues with driver stability, experiencing occasional crashes or compatibility problems with certain software updates. Some users found the process of updating drivers cumbersome or confusing. 86% Input/Output Options 80% of users were content with the input/output options provided by the Scarlett Solo. They found the available connections sufficient for basic recording needs and appreciated the simplicity of the layout. 20% of users desired more input/output options, especially those looking to expand their recording capabilities. Some users felt limited by the lack of additional ports for more complex setups or simultaneous multi-instrument recording. 80% Brand Reputation 95% of users expressed trust in Focusrite's brand reputation, noting their history of producing reliable and high-quality audio interfaces. Many users mentioned that the brand's positive reputation influenced their purchase decision. 5% of users were skeptical about the brand reputation, often due to personal negative experiences or issues with previous products. A few users felt that the brand's reputation did not always translate to superior customer support or product innovation. 95% Compatibility 88% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Scarlett Solo with various systems and software. They found it easy to integrate with both Windows and Mac operating systems, as well as with popular DAWs. 12% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly when using less common DAWs or older operating systems. Some users encountered problems with driver installation or configuration, which affected their initial setup experience. 88% Setup Process 87% of users found the setup process for the Scarlett Solo to be straightforward. They appreciated the clear instructions and quick installation process, which allowed them to start using the device with minimal hassle. 13% of users encountered difficulties during setup. Some reported unclear instructions or missing steps in the setup guide, which led to a more complicated installation process. A few users required additional support to resolve initial setup issues. 87% Firmware Updates 82% of users were satisfied with the availability and effectiveness of firmware updates for the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the improvements in performance and functionality that updates provided, helping to maintain the device's reliability. 18% of users were dissatisfied with the firmware update process. Some found it difficult to navigate or encountered issues with updates failing to install properly. Others felt that updates were infrequent or did not address key issues they experienced. 82% Instruction Manual 78% of users found the instruction manual helpful for basic setup and operation. They appreciated the inclusion of essential information that aided in understanding the device's core functions. 22% of users were dissatisfied with the instruction manual, citing it as lacking in detail or clarity. Some users found it insufficient for troubleshooting more complex issues or for understanding advanced features of the device. 78% Overall Performance 89% of users were satisfied with the overall performance of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its reliability, sound quality, and ease of use, which met or exceeded their expectations for a USB audio interface in its price range. 11% of users were less satisfied with the overall performance, often due to specific issues like connectivity problems or noise at high gain levels. Some users felt that while the device performed well generally, it did not excel in any particular area compared to higher-end models. 89% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

85% of users found the purchase value of the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface to be excellent. They praised its affordability compared to other interfaces offering similar quality and features. The combination of professional-grade sound and user-friendly interface made the EVO 4 a worthwhile investment for both beginners and experienced users.

15% of users felt dissatisfied, mainly due to expectations of more advanced features at a similar price point. Some users compared it to higher-tier audio interfaces and found the EVO 4 lacking in certain premium functionalities.

85%
Quality of Materials

80% of users appreciated the build quality of the Audient EVO 4, noting its sturdy construction and durability. The materials used in its design were considered robust, ensuring longevity and consistent performance over time.

20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the materials, describing them as feeling somewhat 'plasticky' or less premium than expected. These users anticipated a more metallic finish and felt the interface could be more resistant to wear and tear.

80%
Ease of Use

90% of users lauded the EVO 4 for its ease of use, highlighting the intuitive layout and straightforward setup process. The Smartgain feature was particularly praised for simplifying the recording process, making it accessible even for those new to audio interfaces.

10% of users found the learning curve steeper than anticipated, especially when integrating the device with certain DAWs or when seeking to maximize its potential features. This minority felt that initial setup instructions could be more comprehensive.

90%
Sound Quality

92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality delivered by the Audient EVO 4. They noted the clarity and precision in audio capture, attributing these qualities to the high-quality preamps and converters. The interface was often compared favorably to more expensive models.

8% of users expressed dissatisfaction, pointing out occasional background noise or interference in specific recording environments. These users expected a completely noise-free experience and suggested that the noise floor could be improved.

92%
Portability

88% of users were pleased with the portability of the EVO 4, finding its compact design and lightweight nature perfect for mobile recording setups. This portability was a major plus for users who needed to work in various locations.

12% of users felt the interface could be even more compact for easier transport in smaller bags or cases. Additionally, some mentioned that while the device was portable, the accompanying cables could be more travel-friendly.

88%
Driver Stability

82% of users reported stable and reliable performance from the EVO 4's drivers, noting minimal dropouts or latency issues during recording sessions. The drivers were generally easy to install and provided consistent results across different systems.

18% of users encountered stability issues, such as occasional disconnections or compatibility problems with specific operating systems. These users suggested improvements in firmware updates to address these concerns.

82%
Customer Support

78% of users found the customer support for Audient products, including the EVO 4, to be responsive and helpful. Many appreciated the prompt responses and effective solutions provided by the support team.

22% of users were dissatisfied, citing slow response times and unresolved issues. Some users felt that the support team could be more knowledgeable about technical problems specific to the EVO 4.

78%
Design Aesthetics

86% of users appreciated the sleek and modern design of the EVO 4. The minimalist aesthetic and easy-to-read controls were particularly appealing, making the interface a visually attractive addition to any studio setup.

14% of users were less impressed with the design, finding it somewhat plain or lacking distinctive features that make it stand out. They suggested more customizable options or color variations to enhance its visual appeal.

86%
Feature Set

84% of users were satisfied with the feature set of the EVO 4, especially the innovative Smartgain function and loopback capabilities. These features were highly valued by podcasters and streamers for their convenience and functionality.

16% of users felt that the feature set could be expanded. Some expected additional inputs or outputs and more advanced routing options, which they believed would enhance the interface's versatility and appeal.

84%
Integration with DAWs

87% of users reported seamless integration of the EVO 4 with various DAWs, highlighting the ease of setting up and using the interface with popular software like Ableton Live and Logic Pro. The compatibility across multiple platforms was a significant benefit.

13% of users faced challenges with DAW integration, noting occasional issues with recognition or configuration settings. These users suggested that more detailed guidance or tutorials could assist in resolving such problems.

87%
Latency

89% of users were happy with the low latency performance of the EVO 4, praising its ability to deliver real-time monitoring without noticeable delay. This capability was crucial for live recording and streaming applications.

11% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older systems or during high-demand tasks. They recommended optimization options or settings adjustments to further reduce latency.

89%
Durability

81% of users felt confident in the durability of the EVO 4, mentioning the solid construction and resilience of the device under regular use. This durability was a key factor in their positive long-term experience.

19% of users questioned the device's longevity, citing concerns over the durability of knobs and connectors. They suggested improvements in the build quality of these components to enhance overall durability.

81%
Setup Process

88% of users found the setup process of the EVO 4 straightforward and quick, allowing them to start recording within minutes. The simplicity of connecting and configuring the device was a major convenience for users.

12% of users experienced difficulties during setup, often related to driver installation or configuration with their computer systems. They recommended clearer instructions or more detailed setup guides to assist new users.

88%
Headphone Output Quality

85% of users praised the quality of the headphone output, noting the clear and accurate sound reproduction. This aspect was particularly important for monitoring and mixing tasks.

15% of users felt the headphone output could be improved, mentioning issues like insufficient volume levels or slight distortion at higher volumes. They suggested enhancements to the amplifier quality for better performance.

85%
Microphone Preamp Quality

91% of users were impressed with the microphone preamp quality, which provided clean and transparent sound capture with minimal noise. This feature was highly valued by musicians and vocalists for its professional-level performance.

9% of users were less satisfied, citing specific instances of noise or interference in certain environments. They suggested that further refinement in preamp design could mitigate these issues.

91%
USB-C Connectivity

93% of users appreciated the USB-C connectivity, which ensured fast data transfer and reliable power delivery. This modern connection standard was a key advantage for users with newer devices.

7% of users encountered connectivity issues, often related to incompatible cables or ports. They recommended clearer compatibility information and potentially including a USB-C to USB-A adapter.

93%
Loopback Functionality

86% of users found the loopback functionality of the EVO 4 extremely useful, especially for podcasting and live streaming. This feature allowed for easy routing of audio from different sources, enhancing the flexibility of the interface.

14% of users struggled with configuring loopback settings, experiencing difficulties in achieving the desired audio routing. They suggested more detailed instructions or user support for this feature.

86%
Compatibility with Operating Systems

84% of users were satisfied with the operating system compatibility of the EVO 4, highlighting its smooth operation on both Windows and macOS platforms. The plug-and-play nature was a significant convenience for many users.

16% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with Linux systems or during updates to newer OS versions. They recommended expanding support and providing more frequent driver updates.

84%
Control Knob Functionality

82% of users valued the functionality of the control knob, which allowed for precise adjustments and easy navigation of settings. The tactile feel and responsiveness were often highlighted as positive aspects.

18% of users felt the control knob could be improved, noting occasional issues with responsiveness or durability. They suggested enhancements to the knob's design for a smoother user experience.

82%
Overall Satisfaction

88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Audient EVO 4, citing its combination of high-quality sound, user-friendly features, and reliable performance as key factors in their positive experience. The interface met or exceeded expectations for most users.

12% of users were less satisfied overall, often due to specific issues like driver stability or feature limitations that impacted their experience. They recommended addressing these concerns to improve the product's appeal.

88%

Purchase Value

85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation). Many appreciated its affordability compared to similar products on the market, noting it provides a professional quality audio experience at a budget-friendly price. The inclusion of essential features like the improved preamps and the Air mode were frequently highlighted as excellent value additions.

15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to expectations of more features that are available in higher-priced models. Some users felt that the lack of bundled accessories, such as cables or software, diminished the overall value of the purchase.

85%
Quality of Material

90% of users found the quality of material to be excellent. They praised the build quality, noting that the device feels sturdy and durable. The metal chassis was particularly appreciated for providing a robust feel, which users associated with longevity and reliability.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of material. Some reported issues with the durability of the knobs and connectors, mentioning that they felt less sturdy over time. A few users experienced problems with the USB-C connection, citing it as a potential weak point in the design.

90%
Ease of Use

88% of users were satisfied with the ease of use of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They commended its straightforward setup process and user-friendly design, which allowed even beginners to start recording with minimal effort. The clear labeling and intuitive layout were also frequently praised.

12% of users found the device less user-friendly than expected. Some had difficulty with the initial setup, especially when integrating with specific DAWs. Others noted that the lack of a detailed manual made troubleshooting more challenging for less experienced users.

88%
Sound Quality

92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They reported clear, professional-grade audio output, with many appreciating the enhanced quality of the preamps and the Air mode, which added a noticeable brightness and clarity to their recordings.

8% of users were not fully satisfied with the sound quality. Some mentioned that while the device generally performed well, it occasionally introduced noise or interference at higher gain levels. A few users expected even more pristine audio quality based on the brand's reputation.

92%
Connectivity

87% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the USB-C interface for its modern, fast, and reliable connection. Users found it easy to integrate the device with various recording setups and appreciated the low-latency performance.

13% of users faced issues with connectivity. Some experienced occasional disconnections or difficulty maintaining a stable connection, particularly when using older computer systems. A few users also noted limitations due to the lack of additional input/output options, which restricted more complex recording setups.

87%
Software Integration

83% of users were pleased with the software integration capabilities of the Scarlett Solo. Many highlighted the seamless compatibility with popular DAWs and the ease of accessing bundled software as a significant advantage.

17% of users encountered challenges with software integration. Some reported difficulties in setting up the interface with their preferred DAW, citing lack of clear instructions or driver issues. Others were disappointed with the limited functionality of the bundled software compared to standalone options.

83%
Portability

89% of users appreciated the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. Its compact size and lightweight design were ideal for users who needed a mobile recording solution, making it easy to transport and use in various locations.

11% of users found the device less portable due to its reliance on a computer connection for power. Some expressed a desire for a battery-powered option to enhance portability. Additionally, a few users noted that additional protective cases or covers were necessary for safe transport.

89%
Durability

91% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its solid construction and the high-quality materials used, which gave them confidence in its long-term performance and resistance to wear and tear.

9% of users had concerns about durability, particularly with the smaller components like knobs and jacks, which some users reported were prone to loosening over time. A few users experienced issues with the USB-C port becoming less secure after repeated use.

91%
Aesthetic Design

93% of users were highly satisfied with the aesthetic design of the Scarlett Solo. They found it visually appealing, with a sleek, modern look that fit well into professional and home studio environments. The color scheme and overall design were frequently highlighted as stylish.

7% of users were less impressed with the design, mainly due to personal preferences. Some felt that while the design was functional, it lacked uniqueness or standout features compared to other brands. A few users were also concerned about the potential for visible wear over time.

93%
Customer Support

84% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Focusrite. Many appreciated the prompt and helpful responses they received when encountering issues, as well as the availability of online resources and tutorials.

16% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing long wait times and unhelpful responses in some cases. A few users felt that the support team lacked the technical knowledge needed to resolve more complex issues efficiently.

84%
Latency

88% of users praised the low latency performance of the Scarlett Solo. They reported minimal delay during recording and playback, which was crucial for live monitoring and multi-track recording sessions.

12% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older or less powerful computers. Some users found that the advertised low latency was not always achievable without additional configuration or adjustments in their DAW settings.

88%
Preamps

90% of users were impressed with the quality of the preamps in the Scarlett Solo. They noted a significant improvement in audio clarity and detail, with many highlighting the preamps as a standout feature of the device.

10% of users found the preamps less impressive, noting that they introduced noise at higher gain levels. Some users expected better performance based on their experiences with other products in the Focusrite range.

90%
Driver Stability

86% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Scarlett Solo. They reported consistent performance and reliability across different operating systems, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions.

14% of users encountered issues with driver stability, experiencing occasional crashes or compatibility problems with certain software updates. Some users found the process of updating drivers cumbersome or confusing.

86%
Input/Output Options

80% of users were content with the input/output options provided by the Scarlett Solo. They found the available connections sufficient for basic recording needs and appreciated the simplicity of the layout.

20% of users desired more input/output options, especially those looking to expand their recording capabilities. Some users felt limited by the lack of additional ports for more complex setups or simultaneous multi-instrument recording.

80%
Brand Reputation

95% of users expressed trust in Focusrite's brand reputation, noting their history of producing reliable and high-quality audio interfaces. Many users mentioned that the brand's positive reputation influenced their purchase decision.

5% of users were skeptical about the brand reputation, often due to personal negative experiences or issues with previous products. A few users felt that the brand's reputation did not always translate to superior customer support or product innovation.

95%
Compatibility

88% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Scarlett Solo with various systems and software. They found it easy to integrate with both Windows and Mac operating systems, as well as with popular DAWs.

12% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly when using less common DAWs or older operating systems. Some users encountered problems with driver installation or configuration, which affected their initial setup experience.

88%
Setup Process

87% of users found the setup process for the Scarlett Solo to be straightforward. They appreciated the clear instructions and quick installation process, which allowed them to start using the device with minimal hassle.

13% of users encountered difficulties during setup. Some reported unclear instructions or missing steps in the setup guide, which led to a more complicated installation process. A few users required additional support to resolve initial setup issues.

87%
Firmware Updates

82% of users were satisfied with the availability and effectiveness of firmware updates for the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the improvements in performance and functionality that updates provided, helping to maintain the device's reliability.

18% of users were dissatisfied with the firmware update process. Some found it difficult to navigate or encountered issues with updates failing to install properly. Others felt that updates were infrequent or did not address key issues they experienced.

82%
Instruction Manual

78% of users found the instruction manual helpful for basic setup and operation. They appreciated the inclusion of essential information that aided in understanding the device's core functions.

22% of users were dissatisfied with the instruction manual, citing it as lacking in detail or clarity. Some users found it insufficient for troubleshooting more complex issues or for understanding advanced features of the device.

78%
Overall Performance

89% of users were satisfied with the overall performance of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its reliability, sound quality, and ease of use, which met or exceeded their expectations for a USB audio interface in its price range.

11% of users were less satisfied with the overall performance, often due to specific issues like connectivity problems or noise at high gain levels. Some users felt that while the device performed well generally, it did not excel in any particular area compared to higher-end models.

89%

Pros:
High-quality preamps with 58dB gain range. Smartgain feature for automatic level adjustment. Compact and portable design. USB-C connectivity for fast data transfer. Low latency performance. User-friendly interface with LED metering.	High-quality preamps for clear sound recording. USB-C connectivity provides fast and reliable data transfer. Compact and portable design. Easy to use with straightforward controls and setup. Included software package offers great value.

Cons:
Limited to two input channels. Plastic construction may feel less durable. No MIDI input/output. Requires USB-C compatible devices for optimal performance.	Limited to 2 input channels, which may not suffice for larger setups. No MIDI input/output ports. Phantom power is not individually switchable for each input. Higher price compared to some entry-level audio interfaces. Requires a computer to function, not standalone.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 96 kHz	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	1
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.7.5 or Later Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit) 6 or Later	macOS Windows
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface cater to different user needs in terms of their input/output channels, sampling rates, and other specifications.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation) offers 2 analog input and 2 output channels at a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz with a 24-bit resolution. It provides 1 XLR 3-pin balanced microphone input and 1 unbalanced 1/4" TS line/Hi-Z input on the front panel. Additionally, it features 2 balanced 1/4" TRS monitor outputs and a 1/4" TRS headphone output on the front panel. This model supports USB-C for its host connection and is compatible with macOS and Windows operating systems. Power is supplied via USB bus power, with an optional USB power adapter that is not included.
In contrast, the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface provides 2 analog input and 2 output channels at a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz and a 24-bit resolution. It includes 2 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced microphone/line inputs and an additional unbalanced 1/4" TS Hi-Z input. For outputs, the EVO 4 features 2 balanced 1/4" TRS monitor outputs and an unbalanced 1/4" TRS headphone output. This interface also uses USB-C for host connection and is compatible with macOS 10.7.5 or later as well as Windows 7 or later (32-/64-bit). Similar to the Scarlett Solo, it is powered via USB bus power.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo offers a higher maximum sampling rate and includes a single XLR microphone input, making it suitable for solo artists or podcasters who need high-resolution audio. The Audient EVO 4, on the other hand, provides dual XLR-1/4" combo inputs, appealing to users who require more versatility in input options, albeit at a lower maximum sampling rate compared to the Scarlett Solo. Both interfaces are USB-C powered and compatible with both macOS and Windows, but the EVO 4 offers broader OS version compatibility.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 96 kHz	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	1
Input Level Adjustment
2x Automatic 1x Knob	2x Knob
Expansion Slots

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface are both high-quality options for users seeking efficient and effective audio recording solutions, each with its own set of features catering to different needs.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation) offers analog I/O channels with 2 inputs and 2 outputs, supporting a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit resolution. It includes 1 microphone input and features 2 knobs for input level adjustment. This model does not include built-in DSP or a built-in microphone and lacks expansion slots. Its design focuses on providing high-quality audio with simple, manual control over input levels.
In comparison, the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface also provides 2 analog I/O channels with 2 inputs and 2 outputs but supports a slightly lower maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz at 24-bit resolution. Unlike the Scarlett Solo, the EVO 4 comes with 2 microphone preamps and offers automatic input level adjustment in addition to a manual knob. This interface also does not include built-in DSP, a built-in microphone, or expansion slots. The automatic level adjustment feature on the EVO 4 can be particularly useful for users seeking ease of use and consistency in their recordings.
Both interfaces are designed to cater to different aspects of the recording process, with the Scarlett Solo emphasizing higher sampling rates and manual control, while the EVO 4 focuses on ease of use with automatic adjustments and additional microphone inputs.

Signal Processing
Gain/Trim Range
Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs: 58 dB	Mic/Line Inputs: Up to +69 dB Hi-Z Inputs: 62 dB

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface have distinct features that cater to different recording needs.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo's gain/trim range for mic/line inputs can go up to +69 dB, while its Hi-Z inputs offer a gain range of 62 dB. This high gain range makes it suitable for capturing a wide variety of sound sources with clarity. On the other hand, the Audient EVO 4 has a gain/trim range of 58 dB for its mic/line/Hi-Z inputs, which, while slightly lower than the Scarlett Solo, still provides ample headroom for many recording applications.
In terms of additional features, the Audient EVO 4 includes a mute function per input channel as well as a master mute, offering flexibility during live monitoring and recording sessions. This is a valuable feature for users who require quick muting capabilities. However, it lacks a pad and a high-pass filter, which might be a consideration for those looking for more advanced input control options.
Overall, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo stands out with its higher gain range, making it versatile for various recording environments, whereas the Audient EVO 4 offers useful mute functionality but with a slightly lower gain range and fewer input control features.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Phantom Power
48 V ± 4 V, Selectable On/Off (Selectable on Individual Inputs)	48 V, Selectable On/Off
Digital Audio I/O

Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0	USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)

Sync I/O

Network I/O

MIDI I/O

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface are both popular choices in the realm of USB audio interfaces, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences based on their specifications.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation) offers a streamlined analog audio I/O configuration with 1 XLR 3-pin balanced mic input, 1 unbalanced 1/4" TS line/Hi-Z input located on the front panel, 2 balanced 1/4" TRS monitor outputs, and a 1/4" TRS headphone output on the front panel. This setup is ideal for solo musicians or podcasters who require a straightforward and reliable input/output interface. The Scarlett Solo also provides 48V phantom power, which is selectable on or off, making it suitable for condenser microphones that require this feature. However, it does not support digital audio I/O, MIDI I/O, or wireless connectivity, focusing instead on simplicity and core analog functionality. The host connection is facilitated through a USB-C port, following the USB 2.0 protocol.
In contrast, the Audient EVO 4 offers a slightly more versatile analog audio I/O setup. It includes 2 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line inputs, which provide greater flexibility for different recording scenarios, alongside 1 unbalanced 1/4" TS Hi-Z input and 2 balanced 1/4" TRS monitor outputs. Additionally, it features a 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output. The EVO 4's phantom power is also selectable but can be activated individually on each input, allowing for more control over the connected devices. Like the Scarlett Solo, it does not include digital audio I/O, MIDI I/O, or wireless options but connects to the host via a USB-C port using the USB 2.0 protocol.
In summary, while both the Focusrite Scarlett Solo and the Audient EVO 4 offer robust USB-C connectivity and essential analog I/O features, the EVO 4 provides a bit more flexibility with its additional combo inputs and individual phantom power selection, catering to users who may need to connect multiple microphones or instruments simultaneously. The Scarlett Solo, on the other hand, is perfectly suited for solo artists or podcasters who prioritize a straightforward, high-quality input/output setup.

Performance
Frequency Response
Mic Inputs: 10 Hz to 40 kHz ±0.5 dB Line, Hi-Z Inputs: 10 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.5 dB A/D Converters: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB D/A Converters: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB Headphone Outputs: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB	XLR Mic Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB 1/4" Line Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.05 dB 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.15 dB
Maximum Input Level
Mic Inputs: +16 dBu Hi-Z Inputs: +10 dBu	XLR Mic: 9.5 dBu 1/4" Line: 22 dBu 1/4" Hi-Z: 12 dBu
Maximum Output Level
D/A Converters: +11 dBu	1/4" Line: +16 dBu
Headphone Output Power
45 mW into 30 Ohms (Max) 52 mW into 60 Ohms (Max) 20 mW into 600 Ohms (Max)	1/4": 32 mW into 33 Ohms 22 mW into 300 Ohms
Impedance
Mic Inputs: > 3 Kilohms (Balanced) Line Inputs: > 10 Kilohms (Balanced) Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohm (Unbalanced)	XLR Mic Inputs: 3 Kilohms 1/4" Line Inputs: 60 Kilohms 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohms 1/4" Line Outputs: 200 Ohms 1/4" Headphone Outputs: < 50 Ohm
Dynamic Range
AD/DA Converters: 113 dBA	XLR Mic Inputs: 113 dBA 1/4" Line Inputs: 113 dBA 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 112 dBA 1/4" Line Outputs: 120 dB 1/4" Headphone: 112 dB (at 33 Ohms) 115 dB (at 300 Ohms) Digital A/D Converters: 120 dB Digital D/A Converters: 130 dBA
THD+N
A/D Converters: < 0.001% (1 kHz, at -1 dBFS) D/A Converters: < 0.0015% (1 kHz, at -1 dBFS) Headphone Outputs: < 0.0015% (1 kHz, at -1 dBFS) Hi-Z Inputs: < 0.3% (1 kHz) Mic/Line Inputs: < 0.0015% (1 kHz)	XLR Mic Inputs: -100 dB (at Minimum Gain) 1/4" Line Inputs: -100 dB (at 8 dB Gain) 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: -80 dB (at Minimum Gain) 1/4" Line Outputs: -100 dB (at Minimum Gain) 1/4" Headphone Outputs: -97 dB (at 33 Ohms) -102 dB (at 300 Ohms) Digital A/D Converters: -110 dB Digital D/A Converters: -115 dB
EIN
Mic/Line Inputs: < -128 dB	XLR Mic Inputs: -127 dBu A-Weighted

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface both offer robust features for audio recording and production, yet they cater to slightly different needs based on their specifications.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo boasts a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz with minimal deviation across its XLR mic, 1/4" line, and 1/4" Hi-Z inputs. It offers a maximum input level of 9.5 dBu for XLR mic, 22 dBu for line inputs, and 12 dBu for Hi-Z inputs. The maximum output level for its line outputs is +16 dBu. The headphone output power is rated at 32 mW into 33 Ohms and 22 mW into 300 Ohms. The impedance for the various inputs and outputs range from 3 Kilohms for XLR mic inputs to less than 50 Ohms for headphone outputs. The dynamic range is impressive with 113 dBA for both mic and line inputs, and 120 dB for line outputs. The THD+N values are low, ensuring minimal distortion, with -100 dB for XLR mic inputs at minimum gain and -102 dB for headphone outputs at 300 Ohms. The EIN for XLR mic inputs is -127 dBu A-Weighted, indicating low noise levels.
On the other hand, the Audient EVO 4 features a wider frequency response range for mic inputs, from 10 Hz to 40 kHz, and for line and Hi-Z inputs, from 10 Hz to 20 kHz, both with ±0.5 dB accuracy. The maximum input levels are higher compared to the Scarlett Solo, with +16 dBu for mic inputs and +10 dBu for Hi-Z inputs. The maximum output level from the D/A converters is +11 dBu. The headphone output power is significantly higher, with a peak of 45 mW into 30 Ohms and 52 mW into 60 Ohms. The impedance for mic inputs is greater than 3 Kilohms, and for line inputs, it is greater than 10 Kilohms. The dynamic range for the A/D and D/A converters is 113 dBA, matching the Scarlett Solo. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for mic, line, and Hi-Z inputs is 100 dB, and the THD+N is extremely low at less than 0.001% for A/D converters and less than 0.0015% for D/A converters. The EIN for mic/line inputs is less than -128 dB, indicating very low noise performance, and the common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR) for mic/line inputs is greater than 85 dB.
In summary, both interfaces offer high-quality audio performance, but the Focusrite Scarlett Solo is known for its precise frequency response and dynamic range, while the Audient EVO 4 excels in providing a wider frequency response and higher headphone output power. The choice between the two would depend on specific needs such as higher input levels and lower noise performance versus consistent dynamic range and output levels.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
Up to 96 kHz	44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 / 176.4 / 192 kHz
Bit Depths
Up to 24-Bit	24-Bit
Sync Sources
Internal	Internal

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface are both highly regarded devices in the audio interface market, but they come with distinct features that cater to different needs.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) boasts an impressive range of sample rates, offering options at 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, 176.4, and 192 kHz. This wide range provides flexibility for various recording scenarios, from standard CD quality to high-resolution audio. The bit depth is set at 24-bit, which is the industry standard for professional audio, ensuring high-quality sound recording and playback. The Scarlett Solo uses an internal sync source, which simplifies the setup and ensures stable operation without the need for external sync devices.
On the other hand, the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface supports sample rates up to 96 kHz, which is sufficient for most recording needs, though it does not match the higher sample rates offered by the Scarlett Solo. It also supports up to 24-bit depth, maintaining professional audio quality. The EVO 4 features a specific dBFS reference level, with inputs at +8 dBu = 0 dBFS and outputs at +11 dBu = 0 dBFS, which provides clear information for gain staging and ensures optimal signal levels. Latency is another crucial factor where the EVO 4 provides detailed specifications: 5 ms at 44.1 kHz and 4.1 ms at 96 kHz, dependent on buffer size. This low latency makes it a reliable option for real-time recording and monitoring. Similar to the Scarlett Solo, the EVO 4 uses an internal sync source, ensuring stability and simplicity during operation.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation) offers a broader range of sample rates and maintains high-quality 24-bit audio, making it suitable for various high-resolution recording needs. The Audient EVO 4, while capping at a 96 kHz sample rate, provides explicit latency details and a defined dBFS reference level, which may appeal to users who need precise control over their audio signals. Both interfaces ensure stable operation with internal sync sources, making them reliable choices for different recording environments.

Audio Storage & Playback

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.7.5 or Later Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit) 6 or Later	macOS Windows

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface both cater to different OS compatibility and user requirements, offering distinct features that may appeal to various users depending on their specific needs.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo is compatible with both macOS and Windows operating systems. Additionally, it supports mobile app compatibility exclusively with iPadOS, making it a versatile choice for users who wish to integrate it with their Apple tablets for mobile recording setups.
On the other hand, the Audient EVO 4 offers broader OS compatibility, supporting macOS 10.7.5 or later, Windows 7 or later (both 32-/64-bit), and even Linux. This makes it a more flexible option for users across different platforms. It also has specific processor requirements, needing at least an Intel processor for Mac or a 1.6 GHz Intel Core 2 or AMD processor for PC. The EVO 4 requires 1 GB of RAM and an available USB 2.0 port, which is quite standard. Additionally, an internet connection is necessary for registration and software/driver downloads, emphasizing the need for initial online setup and updates.
Both interfaces connect via USB-C, ensuring high-speed data transfer and reduced latency. However, the additional hardware requirements and the necessity for an internet connection for the Audient EVO 4 might be a consideration for users who prefer a more straightforward plug-and-play experience, which the Focusrite Scarlett Solo offers more readily.

Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface are both prominent choices in the market, offering high-quality audio performance. When comparing their power requirements, distinct differences emerge that may influence a user's decision based on their specific needs and setup preferences.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) is designed with versatile power options. It can be powered via USB bus power, which is convenient for users who need a portable and straightforward setup. Additionally, it supports a USB power adapter (not included) and an AC/DC power adapter providing 5 VDC at 900 mA. This flexibility allows users to choose the most suitable power source for their environment, whether they are in a studio or on the go. The power consumption of the Scarlett Solo is 4.5 W, indicating its efficiency in operation.
On the other hand, the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface simplifies its power requirements by relying solely on USB bus power. This design choice makes the EVO 4 extremely portable and user-friendly, as it eliminates the need for additional power adapters and reduces the number of cables required. This can be particularly advantageous for musicians and producers who need a streamlined and efficient setup, whether they are working in a home studio or traveling.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo offers flexibility with multiple power options, making it adaptable to various working conditions and preferences. The Audient EVO 4, however, emphasizes simplicity and portability with its reliance on USB bus power alone, catering to users who prioritize a minimalistic and hassle-free setup. Both interfaces are efficient in their power consumption, ensuring reliable performance for recording and producing audio.

Physical
Dimensions
5.51 x 2.64 x 2.64" / 14 x 6.71 x 6.71 cm	5.63 x 3.78 x 1.79" / 14.3 x 9.6 x 4.55 cm
Weight
12.7 oz / 360.0 g	0.8 lb / 363.0 g

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface present distinct characteristics in terms of dimensions and weight.
Starting with the dimensions, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo measures 5.63 x 3.78 x 1.79 inches (14.3 x 9.6 x 4.55 cm), which indicates a more rectangular and slightly flatter design. On the other hand, the Audient EVO 4 measures 5.51 x 2.64 x 2.64 inches (14 x 6.71 x 6.71 cm), making it more compact in terms of width and height but slightly taller in depth.
When comparing weights, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo weighs 0.8 lb (363.0 g), while the Audient EVO 4 is marginally lighter at 12.7 oz (360.0 g). This minor difference in weight might not be significant for most users, but it does show that the EVO 4 is slightly more lightweight.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo is a bit larger in width and height but has a flatter profile compared to the Audient EVO 4, which is more compact but taller. Weight-wise, both interfaces are very close, with the EVO 4 being slightly lighter.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
1.29 lb	1.305 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
6.8 x 3.85 x 3.55"	7.2 x 6.1 x 2.5"

When comparing the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface, it's clear that both products are designed to be highly portable and efficient for various audio recording needs. However, there are subtle differences in their physical specifications that may influence a user's choice.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Generation has a package weight of 1.305 lb and its box dimensions measure 7.2 x 6.1 x 2.5". This compact and lightweight design makes it easy to transport, suitable for musicians and podcasters who need a reliable interface on the go. The slightly larger box could indicate a more extensive set of accessories or a different internal layout compared to its competitor.
On the other hand, the Audient EVO 4 has a package weight of 1.29 lb and its box dimensions are 6.8 x 3.85 x 3.55". The Audient EVO 4's packaging is marginally lighter and more compact, particularly in width and height, which might make it a bit more convenient for those with limited space in their gear bag. The box's design suggests a more streamlined approach to the interface's housing and accessories.
Both interfaces use USB-C connectivity, ensuring fast data transfer and compatibility with modern computing devices. The minor differences in weight and dimensions reflect subtle variations in design philosophy, with the Scarlett Solo being slightly heavier and broader, while the EVO 4 is more compact and potentially more space-efficient. Ultimately, the choice between these two interfaces may come down to personal preference regarding size and portability, as well as the specific feature sets and performance each interface offers.