Audient EVO 8 vs EVO 4: Which Audio Interface is Right for You?

The Audient EVO 8 Desktop 4x4 USB Type-C Audio Interface and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface are both excellent options for audio recording and production, each offering unique features to cater to different user needs.
The EVO 8 is a more robust model, featuring four inputs and four outputs. This additional I/O capacity makes it ideal for users who need to simultaneously record multiple instruments or microphones, making it a great choice for bands, podcasters with multiple guests, and small studio setups. The EVO 8 maintains Audient's high-quality preamps and converters, ensuring pristine audio capture and playback. It also includes the innovative Smartgain feature, which automatically adjusts the gain levels for optimal recording settings. The EVO 8's USB Type-C connectivity ensures fast and reliable data transfer, with low latency performance.
On the other hand, the Audient EVO 4 is designed for users who require a more streamlined setup. It offers two inputs and two outputs, making it perfectly suited for solo musicians, vocalists, and podcasters who don’t need as many simultaneous recording channels. Like the EVO 8, it also features Audient’s renowned preamps and converters, along with the Smartgain functionality. Its compact design and USB-C interface make it highly portable, allowing users to easily take their recording setup on the go.
Both interfaces are equipped with loopback functionality, making them suitable for live streaming and content creation. They also share a user-friendly software suite that provides easy control over all aspects of the recording process. The key difference lies in the number of inputs and outputs, with the EVO 8 offering greater flexibility for more complex recording scenarios, while the EVO 4 provides a more compact and straightforward solution for simpler setups.
In summary, the Audient EVO 8 is ideal for users who need more I/O options and a versatile recording setup, while the EVO 4 is perfect for those looking for a high-quality, portable interface with fewer input and output requirements. Both models offer excellent audio performance, intuitive features, and reliable connectivity, making them standout choices in their respective categories.

Detailed Specifications and Comparative Review

Audient EVO 4

Audient EVO 8

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 85% of users found the purchase value of the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface to be excellent. They praised its affordability compared to other interfaces offering similar quality and features. The combination of professional-grade sound and user-friendly interface made the EVO 4 a worthwhile investment for both beginners and experienced users. 15% of users felt dissatisfied, mainly due to expectations of more advanced features at a similar price point. Some users compared it to higher-tier audio interfaces and found the EVO 4 lacking in certain premium functionalities. 85% Quality of Materials 80% of users appreciated the build quality of the Audient EVO 4, noting its sturdy construction and durability. The materials used in its design were considered robust, ensuring longevity and consistent performance over time. 20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the materials, describing them as feeling somewhat 'plasticky' or less premium than expected. These users anticipated a more metallic finish and felt the interface could be more resistant to wear and tear. 80% Ease of Use 90% of users lauded the EVO 4 for its ease of use, highlighting the intuitive layout and straightforward setup process. The Smartgain feature was particularly praised for simplifying the recording process, making it accessible even for those new to audio interfaces. 10% of users found the learning curve steeper than anticipated, especially when integrating the device with certain DAWs or when seeking to maximize its potential features. This minority felt that initial setup instructions could be more comprehensive. 90% Sound Quality 92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality delivered by the Audient EVO 4. They noted the clarity and precision in audio capture, attributing these qualities to the high-quality preamps and converters. The interface was often compared favorably to more expensive models. 8% of users expressed dissatisfaction, pointing out occasional background noise or interference in specific recording environments. These users expected a completely noise-free experience and suggested that the noise floor could be improved. 92% Portability 88% of users were pleased with the portability of the EVO 4, finding its compact design and lightweight nature perfect for mobile recording setups. This portability was a major plus for users who needed to work in various locations. 12% of users felt the interface could be even more compact for easier transport in smaller bags or cases. Additionally, some mentioned that while the device was portable, the accompanying cables could be more travel-friendly. 88% Driver Stability 82% of users reported stable and reliable performance from the EVO 4's drivers, noting minimal dropouts or latency issues during recording sessions. The drivers were generally easy to install and provided consistent results across different systems. 18% of users encountered stability issues, such as occasional disconnections or compatibility problems with specific operating systems. These users suggested improvements in firmware updates to address these concerns. 82% Customer Support 78% of users found the customer support for Audient products, including the EVO 4, to be responsive and helpful. Many appreciated the prompt responses and effective solutions provided by the support team. 22% of users were dissatisfied, citing slow response times and unresolved issues. Some users felt that the support team could be more knowledgeable about technical problems specific to the EVO 4. 78% Design Aesthetics 86% of users appreciated the sleek and modern design of the EVO 4. The minimalist aesthetic and easy-to-read controls were particularly appealing, making the interface a visually attractive addition to any studio setup. 14% of users were less impressed with the design, finding it somewhat plain or lacking distinctive features that make it stand out. They suggested more customizable options or color variations to enhance its visual appeal. 86% Feature Set 84% of users were satisfied with the feature set of the EVO 4, especially the innovative Smartgain function and loopback capabilities. These features were highly valued by podcasters and streamers for their convenience and functionality. 16% of users felt that the feature set could be expanded. Some expected additional inputs or outputs and more advanced routing options, which they believed would enhance the interface's versatility and appeal. 84% Integration with DAWs 87% of users reported seamless integration of the EVO 4 with various DAWs, highlighting the ease of setting up and using the interface with popular software like Ableton Live and Logic Pro. The compatibility across multiple platforms was a significant benefit. 13% of users faced challenges with DAW integration, noting occasional issues with recognition or configuration settings. These users suggested that more detailed guidance or tutorials could assist in resolving such problems. 87% Latency 89% of users were happy with the low latency performance of the EVO 4, praising its ability to deliver real-time monitoring without noticeable delay. This capability was crucial for live recording and streaming applications. 11% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older systems or during high-demand tasks. They recommended optimization options or settings adjustments to further reduce latency. 89% Durability 81% of users felt confident in the durability of the EVO 4, mentioning the solid construction and resilience of the device under regular use. This durability was a key factor in their positive long-term experience. 19% of users questioned the device's longevity, citing concerns over the durability of knobs and connectors. They suggested improvements in the build quality of these components to enhance overall durability. 81% Setup Process 88% of users found the setup process of the EVO 4 straightforward and quick, allowing them to start recording within minutes. The simplicity of connecting and configuring the device was a major convenience for users. 12% of users experienced difficulties during setup, often related to driver installation or configuration with their computer systems. They recommended clearer instructions or more detailed setup guides to assist new users. 88% Headphone Output Quality 85% of users praised the quality of the headphone output, noting the clear and accurate sound reproduction. This aspect was particularly important for monitoring and mixing tasks. 15% of users felt the headphone output could be improved, mentioning issues like insufficient volume levels or slight distortion at higher volumes. They suggested enhancements to the amplifier quality for better performance. 85% Microphone Preamp Quality 91% of users were impressed with the microphone preamp quality, which provided clean and transparent sound capture with minimal noise. This feature was highly valued by musicians and vocalists for its professional-level performance. 9% of users were less satisfied, citing specific instances of noise or interference in certain environments. They suggested that further refinement in preamp design could mitigate these issues. 91% USB-C Connectivity 93% of users appreciated the USB-C connectivity, which ensured fast data transfer and reliable power delivery. This modern connection standard was a key advantage for users with newer devices. 7% of users encountered connectivity issues, often related to incompatible cables or ports. They recommended clearer compatibility information and potentially including a USB-C to USB-A adapter. 93% Loopback Functionality 86% of users found the loopback functionality of the EVO 4 extremely useful, especially for podcasting and live streaming. This feature allowed for easy routing of audio from different sources, enhancing the flexibility of the interface. 14% of users struggled with configuring loopback settings, experiencing difficulties in achieving the desired audio routing. They suggested more detailed instructions or user support for this feature. 86% Compatibility with Operating Systems 84% of users were satisfied with the operating system compatibility of the EVO 4, highlighting its smooth operation on both Windows and macOS platforms. The plug-and-play nature was a significant convenience for many users. 16% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with Linux systems or during updates to newer OS versions. They recommended expanding support and providing more frequent driver updates. 84% Control Knob Functionality 82% of users valued the functionality of the control knob, which allowed for precise adjustments and easy navigation of settings. The tactile feel and responsiveness were often highlighted as positive aspects. 18% of users felt the control knob could be improved, noting occasional issues with responsiveness or durability. They suggested enhancements to the knob's design for a smoother user experience. 82% Overall Satisfaction 88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Audient EVO 4, citing its combination of high-quality sound, user-friendly features, and reliable performance as key factors in their positive experience. The interface met or exceeded expectations for most users. 12% of users were less satisfied overall, often due to specific issues like driver stability or feature limitations that impacted their experience. They recommended addressing these concerns to improve the product's appeal. 88%	Purchase Value 85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Audient EVO 8, citing that it offers a great balance between price and features. Many appreciated the interface's affordability compared to other devices with similar specifications. Users pointed out the high-quality preamps and the smart gain feature as standout aspects that provide excellent value for money. 15% of users felt dissatisfied with the purchase value, often comparing it unfavorably to cheaper alternatives or expecting more features at this price point. Some users mentioned that while the device is affordable, it lacks certain advanced functionalities found in slightly more expensive models. 85% Quality of Materials 80% of users expressed satisfaction with the quality of materials used in the Audient EVO 8. They appreciated the robust build and the sleek, modern design. Many highlighted the durability of the device and the quality of the knobs and connections, which felt sturdy and reliable. 20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of materials, noting that the plastic components felt less premium than expected. Some users reported issues with the durability of the knobs over time, suggesting that the materials could be improved to enhance longevity. 80% Ease of Use 90% of users were highly satisfied with how easy the Audient EVO 8 is to use, praising its intuitive design and straightforward setup process. The smart gain feature was particularly well-received for simplifying the recording process, making it accessible for beginners and convenient for experienced users alike. 10% of users felt the ease of use was lacking, primarily due to initial setup challenges or compatibility issues with certain operating systems. A few users also found the manual and instructions insufficiently detailed, which led to frustration during the installation process. 90% Audio Quality 95% of users were extremely satisfied with the audio quality provided by the Audient EVO 8, with many praising the clarity and detail it delivers. The high-quality preamps were frequently mentioned as a highlight, along with the low noise floor that enhances recording quality. 5% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the audio quality, often due to specific issues like background noise or interference that they encountered. Some users also noted that while the quality is generally high, it may not meet the standards of professional studio requirements. 95% Portability 75% of users were satisfied with the portability of the Audient EVO 8, appreciating its compact size and lightweight design, which makes it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions or live performances. 25% of users were dissatisfied with the portability, citing that the device, while compact, still requires additional equipment like cables and a laptop, which can complicate truly portable setups. Some users desired a more integrated solution. 75% Connectivity Options 85% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options offered by the Audient EVO 8. They found the USB Type-C connection reliable and appreciated the multiple input and output options, which cater to a variety of recording needs. 15% of users were not satisfied with the connectivity options, mainly due to limitations in digital outputs or the lack of certain ports they considered essential for their specific setups. Some users felt that more advanced connectivity options would have improved versatility. 85% Software Integration 80% of users were satisfied with the software integration, finding it seamless with most digital audio workstations (DAWs). Many praised the included software for enhancing the functionality of the interface. 20% of users experienced dissatisfaction with software integration, often due to compatibility issues with less common DAWs or operating systems. Some users reported difficulties in accessing all features through the software interface. 80% Customer Support 70% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Audient, noting prompt responses and helpful guidance during troubleshooting. Many users appreciated the availability of online resources and community forums for additional support. 30% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses or inadequate solutions to their issues. Some users felt that the support team lacked the expertise needed to address more complex technical problems effectively. 70% Durability 75% of users expressed satisfaction with the durability of the Audient EVO 8, mentioning that it withstood regular use without significant wear and tear. Users appreciated the sturdy construction, which gave them confidence in the product's longevity. 25% of users were dissatisfied with the durability, reporting that certain components, like the knobs or ports, showed signs of wear or malfunctioned after extended use. Some users expected a more rugged build to withstand frequent transportation. 75% Versatility 85% of users appreciated the versatility of the Audient EVO 8, noting its ability to handle various recording scenarios from podcasts to music production. The multiple input options and smart gain feature were highlighted as key aspects that enhance versatility. 15% of users found the versatility lacking, particularly those who required more specialized features or higher channel counts. Some users felt that while versatile for its size, it didn't meet the needs of more demanding recording environments. 85% Latency Performance 90% of users were impressed with the low latency performance of the Audient EVO 8, which ensured smooth recording and monitoring experiences. Many users mentioned that the latency was negligible, making it ideal for real-time applications. 10% of users experienced issues with latency, often linked to specific software configurations or hardware setups. Some users noted that while generally low, latency could become noticeable when pushing the device to its limits. 90% Aesthetic Design 80% of users were pleased with the aesthetic design of the Audient EVO 8, appreciating its modern and sleek appearance. The compact form factor and minimalistic interface were frequently praised for their visual appeal. 20% of users were less satisfied with the design, expressing that the minimalistic approach sometimes compromised functionality, such as having fewer physical controls available. Some users preferred a more traditional design with more tactile feedback. 80% User Manual Clarity 70% of users found the user manual to be clear and helpful, providing adequate information for setup and operation. Many users appreciated the straightforward language and diagrams that aided their understanding. 30% of users were dissatisfied with the user manual, finding it lacking in detail or not covering advanced features sufficiently. Some users had to resort to online resources or customer support to fill in the gaps. 70% Driver Stability 85% of users reported satisfaction with the stability of the drivers for the Audient EVO 8, noting that they experienced few to no crashes or glitches during operation. Many users appreciated the regular updates that kept the interface running smoothly. 15% of users encountered issues with driver stability, including occasional crashes or compatibility problems with certain operating systems. Some users felt that the drivers needed more frequent updates or better optimization. 85% Smart Gain Feature 95% of users were thrilled with the smart gain feature, which made setting levels easy and efficient. Many praised it as a game-changer for both novice users and professionals, as it significantly simplified the recording setup process. 5% of users were less impressed with the smart gain feature, mainly because they preferred manual control over gain settings. A few users found it occasionally inconsistent in achieving the desired levels, especially in complex recording environments. 95% Size and Weight 80% of users were satisfied with the size and weight of the Audient EVO 8, finding it compact and lightweight enough for easy transportation, which is ideal for users with limited workspace or those who travel frequently. 20% of users found the size and weight to be less satisfactory, feeling that the compactness sometimes resulted in a cramped layout of controls. Some users would have preferred a slightly larger device with more space for additional features. 80% Included Software 75% of users appreciated the included software, which added value to the Audient EVO 8 by enhancing its functionality. Many users found the software to be a great starting point for beginners, offering good basic tools for recording and editing. 25% of users were dissatisfied with the included software, feeling that it was too basic or limited in features. Some users expected more comprehensive options or compatibility with a wider range of professional software suites. 75% Preamp Quality 90% of users were impressed with the preamp quality of the Audient EVO 8, highlighting the clean and transparent sound it delivers. Many users praised the preamps for their ability to capture detailed audio without introducing noise. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the preamp quality, noting that while generally high, it occasionally fell short in very demanding recording situations. Some users compared it unfavorably to more expensive, high-end preamps. 90% Compatibility with DAWs 85% of users reported good compatibility with a wide range of DAWs, appreciating the seamless integration and plug-and-play functionality. Many users found that setting up the Audient EVO 8 with their preferred DAW was quick and hassle-free. 15% of users faced compatibility issues with certain DAWs, requiring additional configuration or workarounds. Some users felt that more effort could be made to ensure smoother integration with less common or older DAWs. 85% Noise Floor 90% of users were satisfied with the low noise floor of the Audient EVO 8, which contributed to clear and pristine recordings. Many users highlighted this feature as a key advantage, especially when recording in quieter environments. 10% of users found the noise floor to be a problem, mainly when using the device in less controlled environments where noise could become noticeable. Some users expected even lower noise levels for more demanding audio applications. 90% Overall Performance 88% of users were satisfied with the overall performance of the Audient EVO 8, praising its reliability, excellent audio quality, and user-friendly features. Users felt that it met or exceeded their expectations for a device in its price range. 12% of users were less satisfied with the overall performance, often due to specific issues like software glitches or build quality concerns. Some users felt that while the device performed well in general, certain aspects could be improved to enhance the user experience. 88% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

85% of users found the purchase value of the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface to be excellent. They praised its affordability compared to other interfaces offering similar quality and features. The combination of professional-grade sound and user-friendly interface made the EVO 4 a worthwhile investment for both beginners and experienced users.

15% of users felt dissatisfied, mainly due to expectations of more advanced features at a similar price point. Some users compared it to higher-tier audio interfaces and found the EVO 4 lacking in certain premium functionalities.

85%
Quality of Materials

80% of users appreciated the build quality of the Audient EVO 4, noting its sturdy construction and durability. The materials used in its design were considered robust, ensuring longevity and consistent performance over time.

20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the materials, describing them as feeling somewhat 'plasticky' or less premium than expected. These users anticipated a more metallic finish and felt the interface could be more resistant to wear and tear.

80%
Ease of Use

90% of users lauded the EVO 4 for its ease of use, highlighting the intuitive layout and straightforward setup process. The Smartgain feature was particularly praised for simplifying the recording process, making it accessible even for those new to audio interfaces.

10% of users found the learning curve steeper than anticipated, especially when integrating the device with certain DAWs or when seeking to maximize its potential features. This minority felt that initial setup instructions could be more comprehensive.

90%
Sound Quality

92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality delivered by the Audient EVO 4. They noted the clarity and precision in audio capture, attributing these qualities to the high-quality preamps and converters. The interface was often compared favorably to more expensive models.

8% of users expressed dissatisfaction, pointing out occasional background noise or interference in specific recording environments. These users expected a completely noise-free experience and suggested that the noise floor could be improved.

92%
Portability

88% of users were pleased with the portability of the EVO 4, finding its compact design and lightweight nature perfect for mobile recording setups. This portability was a major plus for users who needed to work in various locations.

12% of users felt the interface could be even more compact for easier transport in smaller bags or cases. Additionally, some mentioned that while the device was portable, the accompanying cables could be more travel-friendly.

88%
Driver Stability

82% of users reported stable and reliable performance from the EVO 4's drivers, noting minimal dropouts or latency issues during recording sessions. The drivers were generally easy to install and provided consistent results across different systems.

18% of users encountered stability issues, such as occasional disconnections or compatibility problems with specific operating systems. These users suggested improvements in firmware updates to address these concerns.

82%
Customer Support

78% of users found the customer support for Audient products, including the EVO 4, to be responsive and helpful. Many appreciated the prompt responses and effective solutions provided by the support team.

22% of users were dissatisfied, citing slow response times and unresolved issues. Some users felt that the support team could be more knowledgeable about technical problems specific to the EVO 4.

78%
Design Aesthetics

86% of users appreciated the sleek and modern design of the EVO 4. The minimalist aesthetic and easy-to-read controls were particularly appealing, making the interface a visually attractive addition to any studio setup.

14% of users were less impressed with the design, finding it somewhat plain or lacking distinctive features that make it stand out. They suggested more customizable options or color variations to enhance its visual appeal.

86%
Feature Set

84% of users were satisfied with the feature set of the EVO 4, especially the innovative Smartgain function and loopback capabilities. These features were highly valued by podcasters and streamers for their convenience and functionality.

16% of users felt that the feature set could be expanded. Some expected additional inputs or outputs and more advanced routing options, which they believed would enhance the interface's versatility and appeal.

84%
Integration with DAWs

87% of users reported seamless integration of the EVO 4 with various DAWs, highlighting the ease of setting up and using the interface with popular software like Ableton Live and Logic Pro. The compatibility across multiple platforms was a significant benefit.

13% of users faced challenges with DAW integration, noting occasional issues with recognition or configuration settings. These users suggested that more detailed guidance or tutorials could assist in resolving such problems.

87%
Latency

89% of users were happy with the low latency performance of the EVO 4, praising its ability to deliver real-time monitoring without noticeable delay. This capability was crucial for live recording and streaming applications.

11% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older systems or during high-demand tasks. They recommended optimization options or settings adjustments to further reduce latency.

89%
Durability

81% of users felt confident in the durability of the EVO 4, mentioning the solid construction and resilience of the device under regular use. This durability was a key factor in their positive long-term experience.

19% of users questioned the device's longevity, citing concerns over the durability of knobs and connectors. They suggested improvements in the build quality of these components to enhance overall durability.

81%
Setup Process

88% of users found the setup process of the EVO 4 straightforward and quick, allowing them to start recording within minutes. The simplicity of connecting and configuring the device was a major convenience for users.

12% of users experienced difficulties during setup, often related to driver installation or configuration with their computer systems. They recommended clearer instructions or more detailed setup guides to assist new users.

88%
Headphone Output Quality

85% of users praised the quality of the headphone output, noting the clear and accurate sound reproduction. This aspect was particularly important for monitoring and mixing tasks.

15% of users felt the headphone output could be improved, mentioning issues like insufficient volume levels or slight distortion at higher volumes. They suggested enhancements to the amplifier quality for better performance.

85%
Microphone Preamp Quality

91% of users were impressed with the microphone preamp quality, which provided clean and transparent sound capture with minimal noise. This feature was highly valued by musicians and vocalists for its professional-level performance.

9% of users were less satisfied, citing specific instances of noise or interference in certain environments. They suggested that further refinement in preamp design could mitigate these issues.

91%
USB-C Connectivity

93% of users appreciated the USB-C connectivity, which ensured fast data transfer and reliable power delivery. This modern connection standard was a key advantage for users with newer devices.

7% of users encountered connectivity issues, often related to incompatible cables or ports. They recommended clearer compatibility information and potentially including a USB-C to USB-A adapter.

93%
Loopback Functionality

86% of users found the loopback functionality of the EVO 4 extremely useful, especially for podcasting and live streaming. This feature allowed for easy routing of audio from different sources, enhancing the flexibility of the interface.

14% of users struggled with configuring loopback settings, experiencing difficulties in achieving the desired audio routing. They suggested more detailed instructions or user support for this feature.

86%
Compatibility with Operating Systems

84% of users were satisfied with the operating system compatibility of the EVO 4, highlighting its smooth operation on both Windows and macOS platforms. The plug-and-play nature was a significant convenience for many users.

16% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with Linux systems or during updates to newer OS versions. They recommended expanding support and providing more frequent driver updates.

84%
Control Knob Functionality

82% of users valued the functionality of the control knob, which allowed for precise adjustments and easy navigation of settings. The tactile feel and responsiveness were often highlighted as positive aspects.

18% of users felt the control knob could be improved, noting occasional issues with responsiveness or durability. They suggested enhancements to the knob's design for a smoother user experience.

82%
Overall Satisfaction

88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Audient EVO 4, citing its combination of high-quality sound, user-friendly features, and reliable performance as key factors in their positive experience. The interface met or exceeded expectations for most users.

12% of users were less satisfied overall, often due to specific issues like driver stability or feature limitations that impacted their experience. They recommended addressing these concerns to improve the product's appeal.

88%

Purchase Value

85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Audient EVO 8, citing that it offers a great balance between price and features. Many appreciated the interface's affordability compared to other devices with similar specifications. Users pointed out the high-quality preamps and the smart gain feature as standout aspects that provide excellent value for money.

15% of users felt dissatisfied with the purchase value, often comparing it unfavorably to cheaper alternatives or expecting more features at this price point. Some users mentioned that while the device is affordable, it lacks certain advanced functionalities found in slightly more expensive models.

85%
Quality of Materials

80% of users expressed satisfaction with the quality of materials used in the Audient EVO 8. They appreciated the robust build and the sleek, modern design. Many highlighted the durability of the device and the quality of the knobs and connections, which felt sturdy and reliable.

20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of materials, noting that the plastic components felt less premium than expected. Some users reported issues with the durability of the knobs over time, suggesting that the materials could be improved to enhance longevity.

80%
Ease of Use

90% of users were highly satisfied with how easy the Audient EVO 8 is to use, praising its intuitive design and straightforward setup process. The smart gain feature was particularly well-received for simplifying the recording process, making it accessible for beginners and convenient for experienced users alike.

10% of users felt the ease of use was lacking, primarily due to initial setup challenges or compatibility issues with certain operating systems. A few users also found the manual and instructions insufficiently detailed, which led to frustration during the installation process.

90%
Audio Quality

95% of users were extremely satisfied with the audio quality provided by the Audient EVO 8, with many praising the clarity and detail it delivers. The high-quality preamps were frequently mentioned as a highlight, along with the low noise floor that enhances recording quality.

5% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the audio quality, often due to specific issues like background noise or interference that they encountered. Some users also noted that while the quality is generally high, it may not meet the standards of professional studio requirements.

95%
Portability

75% of users were satisfied with the portability of the Audient EVO 8, appreciating its compact size and lightweight design, which makes it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions or live performances.

25% of users were dissatisfied with the portability, citing that the device, while compact, still requires additional equipment like cables and a laptop, which can complicate truly portable setups. Some users desired a more integrated solution.

75%
Connectivity Options

85% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options offered by the Audient EVO 8. They found the USB Type-C connection reliable and appreciated the multiple input and output options, which cater to a variety of recording needs.

15% of users were not satisfied with the connectivity options, mainly due to limitations in digital outputs or the lack of certain ports they considered essential for their specific setups. Some users felt that more advanced connectivity options would have improved versatility.

85%
Software Integration

80% of users were satisfied with the software integration, finding it seamless with most digital audio workstations (DAWs). Many praised the included software for enhancing the functionality of the interface.

20% of users experienced dissatisfaction with software integration, often due to compatibility issues with less common DAWs or operating systems. Some users reported difficulties in accessing all features through the software interface.

80%
Customer Support

70% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Audient, noting prompt responses and helpful guidance during troubleshooting. Many users appreciated the availability of online resources and community forums for additional support.

30% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses or inadequate solutions to their issues. Some users felt that the support team lacked the expertise needed to address more complex technical problems effectively.

70%
Durability

75% of users expressed satisfaction with the durability of the Audient EVO 8, mentioning that it withstood regular use without significant wear and tear. Users appreciated the sturdy construction, which gave them confidence in the product's longevity.

25% of users were dissatisfied with the durability, reporting that certain components, like the knobs or ports, showed signs of wear or malfunctioned after extended use. Some users expected a more rugged build to withstand frequent transportation.

75%
Versatility

85% of users appreciated the versatility of the Audient EVO 8, noting its ability to handle various recording scenarios from podcasts to music production. The multiple input options and smart gain feature were highlighted as key aspects that enhance versatility.

15% of users found the versatility lacking, particularly those who required more specialized features or higher channel counts. Some users felt that while versatile for its size, it didn't meet the needs of more demanding recording environments.

85%
Latency Performance

90% of users were impressed with the low latency performance of the Audient EVO 8, which ensured smooth recording and monitoring experiences. Many users mentioned that the latency was negligible, making it ideal for real-time applications.

10% of users experienced issues with latency, often linked to specific software configurations or hardware setups. Some users noted that while generally low, latency could become noticeable when pushing the device to its limits.

90%
Aesthetic Design

80% of users were pleased with the aesthetic design of the Audient EVO 8, appreciating its modern and sleek appearance. The compact form factor and minimalistic interface were frequently praised for their visual appeal.

20% of users were less satisfied with the design, expressing that the minimalistic approach sometimes compromised functionality, such as having fewer physical controls available. Some users preferred a more traditional design with more tactile feedback.

80%
User Manual Clarity

70% of users found the user manual to be clear and helpful, providing adequate information for setup and operation. Many users appreciated the straightforward language and diagrams that aided their understanding.

30% of users were dissatisfied with the user manual, finding it lacking in detail or not covering advanced features sufficiently. Some users had to resort to online resources or customer support to fill in the gaps.

70%
Driver Stability

85% of users reported satisfaction with the stability of the drivers for the Audient EVO 8, noting that they experienced few to no crashes or glitches during operation. Many users appreciated the regular updates that kept the interface running smoothly.

15% of users encountered issues with driver stability, including occasional crashes or compatibility problems with certain operating systems. Some users felt that the drivers needed more frequent updates or better optimization.

85%
Smart Gain Feature

95% of users were thrilled with the smart gain feature, which made setting levels easy and efficient. Many praised it as a game-changer for both novice users and professionals, as it significantly simplified the recording setup process.

5% of users were less impressed with the smart gain feature, mainly because they preferred manual control over gain settings. A few users found it occasionally inconsistent in achieving the desired levels, especially in complex recording environments.

95%
Size and Weight

80% of users were satisfied with the size and weight of the Audient EVO 8, finding it compact and lightweight enough for easy transportation, which is ideal for users with limited workspace or those who travel frequently.

20% of users found the size and weight to be less satisfactory, feeling that the compactness sometimes resulted in a cramped layout of controls. Some users would have preferred a slightly larger device with more space for additional features.

80%
Included Software

75% of users appreciated the included software, which added value to the Audient EVO 8 by enhancing its functionality. Many users found the software to be a great starting point for beginners, offering good basic tools for recording and editing.

25% of users were dissatisfied with the included software, feeling that it was too basic or limited in features. Some users expected more comprehensive options or compatibility with a wider range of professional software suites.

75%
Preamp Quality

90% of users were impressed with the preamp quality of the Audient EVO 8, highlighting the clean and transparent sound it delivers. Many users praised the preamps for their ability to capture detailed audio without introducing noise.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the preamp quality, noting that while generally high, it occasionally fell short in very demanding recording situations. Some users compared it unfavorably to more expensive, high-end preamps.

90%
Compatibility with DAWs

85% of users reported good compatibility with a wide range of DAWs, appreciating the seamless integration and plug-and-play functionality. Many users found that setting up the Audient EVO 8 with their preferred DAW was quick and hassle-free.

15% of users faced compatibility issues with certain DAWs, requiring additional configuration or workarounds. Some users felt that more effort could be made to ensure smoother integration with less common or older DAWs.

85%
Noise Floor

90% of users were satisfied with the low noise floor of the Audient EVO 8, which contributed to clear and pristine recordings. Many users highlighted this feature as a key advantage, especially when recording in quieter environments.

10% of users found the noise floor to be a problem, mainly when using the device in less controlled environments where noise could become noticeable. Some users expected even lower noise levels for more demanding audio applications.

90%
Overall Performance

88% of users were satisfied with the overall performance of the Audient EVO 8, praising its reliability, excellent audio quality, and user-friendly features. Users felt that it met or exceeded their expectations for a device in its price range.

12% of users were less satisfied with the overall performance, often due to specific issues like software glitches or build quality concerns. Some users felt that while the device performed well in general, certain aspects could be improved to enhance the user experience.

88%

Pros:
High-quality preamps with 58dB gain range. Smartgain feature for automatic level adjustment. Compact and portable design. USB-C connectivity for fast data transfer. Low latency performance. User-friendly interface with LED metering.	High-quality preamps with 58dB gain range for clean recordings. Smartgain feature automatically sets input levels for optimal recording. USB Type-C connectivity for fast and reliable data transfer. Compact and portable design, ideal for mobile recording setups. User-friendly interface with easy-to-use controls.

Cons:
Limited to two input channels. Plastic construction may feel less durable. No MIDI input/output. Requires USB-C compatible devices for optimal performance.	Limited to 4 inputs and 4 outputs, which might not be enough for larger setups. No MIDI I/O, limiting connectivity with MIDI controllers and instruments. Plastic construction might not be as durable as metal alternatives. No onboard DSP for real-time effects processing. Requires external power supply, which can limit portability.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 96 kHz	Analog: 4 Inputs / 4 Outputs at 96 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	96 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	4 Preamps
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	4x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input (Pin 2 Hot) 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 4x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output (Tip Hot) 2x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output
Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.7.5 or Later Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit) 6 or Later	macOS 10.7.5 or Later Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit)
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

The Audient EVO 8 Desktop 4x4 USB Type-C Audio Interface and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface are both high-quality audio interfaces designed to meet the needs of musicians and audio engineers. However, they differ significantly in their specifications and capabilities.
The Audient EVO 8 offers a more extensive channel configuration with 4 inputs and 4 outputs, making it ideal for users who require multiple input sources simultaneously. It features 4 microphone preamps, providing versatility for recording various instruments or vocalists. Additionally, the EVO 8 supports a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz / 24-Bit and includes a variety of analog audio I/O options: 4x combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line inputs, a 1/4" TS unbalanced Hi-Z input, and 4x 1/4" TRS balanced line outputs. The device also features dual 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone outputs for monitoring. It connects via USB-C and is compatible with macOS 10.7.5 or later and Windows 7 or later (32-/64-Bit), with power supplied through USB bus power.
In contrast, the Audient EVO 4 is more compact with 2 inputs and 2 outputs, catering to users who need a simpler setup. It comes equipped with 2 microphone preamps and also supports a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz / 24-Bit. The audio I/O includes 2x combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line inputs, a 1/4" TS unbalanced Hi-Z input, 2x 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs, and a 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output. Like the EVO 8, it connects via USB-C and is compatible with macOS 10.7.5 or later and Windows 7 or later (32-/64-Bit) as well. It also relies on USB bus power for operation.
In summary, the choice between the Audient EVO 8 and the Audient EVO 4 largely depends on the user's needs for input and output channels. The EVO 8 provides a more robust solution for multi-channel recording, while the EVO 4 offers a streamlined option for those who require fewer connections.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 96 kHz	Analog: 4 Inputs / 4 Outputs at 96 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	96 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	4 Preamps
Input Level Adjustment
2x Automatic 1x Knob	4x Automatic 1x Knob
Expansion Slots

The Audient EVO 8 and EVO 4 USB-C audio interfaces cater to different needs in the realm of audio recording and production.
Starting with the Audient EVO 8, this desktop interface offers a robust configuration with 4 analog inputs and 4 outputs, making it ideal for users who require multiple channels for recording instruments or vocals. It features 4 microphone preamps, enabling simultaneous recording of several audio sources with high-quality sound. The EVO 8 also supports a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz at 24-bit, ensuring that the audio fidelity is maintained during recordings. Input level adjustment is facilitated through automatic gain control for all four inputs, along with a straightforward single knob for manual adjustments, which enhances user convenience.
On the other hand, the Audient EVO 4 presents a more compact option with 2 analog inputs and 2 outputs, catering primarily to solo artists or small setups. This model is equipped with 2 microphone preamps, allowing for high-quality recordings of vocals or instruments, albeit with fewer simultaneous inputs compared to the EVO 8. Like its counterpart, the EVO 4 also supports a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz at 24-bit. For input level adjustments, it features automatic gain control for both inputs alongside a single knob for manual fine-tuning, providing an intuitive interface for users.
In summary, the choice between the Audient EVO 8 and EVO 4 largely hinges on the user's recording needs. The EVO 8 is designed for more extensive setups with its additional channels and preamps, while the EVO 4 serves as a more streamlined solution for those who require fewer inputs without compromising on quality.

Signal Processing
Pad

Gain/Trim Range
Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs: 58 dB	Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs: 58 dB
High-Pass Filter

Solo/Mute
Mute per Input Channel, Master	Mute per Input Channel, Master

The Audient EVO 8 Desktop 4x4 USB Type-C Audio Interface and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface share several similarities, particularly in terms of their specifications and functionalities. Both interfaces do not feature a pad, which may be a consideration for users who require an additional level of gain attenuation before hitting the preamps.
In terms of gain and trim range, both the EVO 8 and EVO 4 offer a robust range of 58 dB for mic, line, and Hi-Z inputs, allowing for versatility in capturing various audio sources with sufficient headroom. This makes them well-suited for a range of recording applications, from vocals to instruments.
Neither model includes a high-pass filter, which could be a limitation for users looking to eliminate low-frequency rumble or unwanted noise in their recordings. However, both devices do provide mute functionality on a per-input channel basis and for the master output, giving users control over their monitoring and recording environment.
Overall, while the Audient EVO 8 and EVO 4 share almost identical specifications in these key areas, the primary distinction lies in their input/output capabilities and form factor, with the EVO 8 designed as a more expansive 4x4 interface compared to the 2x2 configuration of the EVO 4. This makes the EVO 8 a better choice for users needing more inputs and outputs for their recording setups.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	4x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input (Pin 2 Hot) 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 4x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output (Tip Hot) 2x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output
Phantom Power
48 V ± 4 V, Selectable On/Off (Selectable on Individual Inputs)	48 V ± 4 V, Selectable On/Off (Selectable on Individual Inputs)
Phantom Power Current
10 mA per Channel	10 mA per Channel
Digital Audio I/O

Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0	USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)

Sync I/O

Network I/O

MIDI I/O

The Audient EVO 8 and EVO 4 USB audio interfaces cater to different user needs with their unique specifications and features. The EVO 8 Desktop 4x4 USB Type-C Audio Interface provides a more extensive range of analog audio inputs and outputs compared to the EVO 4. Specifically, the EVO 8 includes 4 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line inputs and an additional 1/4" TS unbalanced Hi-Z input. In contrast, the EVO 4 offers only 2 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line inputs and a single 1/4" TS unbalanced Hi-Z input. This makes the EVO 8 a more suitable choice for users requiring multiple mic inputs or those working in collaborative environments.
When it comes to output options, the EVO 8 boasts 4 balanced line outputs and 2 unbalanced headphone outputs, allowing for greater flexibility in routing audio. The EVO 4, on the other hand, is equipped with 2 balanced monitor outputs and a single unbalanced headphone output. This difference in output capabilities makes the EVO 8 more versatile for studio setups that necessitate multiple output paths.
Both interfaces offer 48 V phantom power, selectable on individual inputs, with a current of 10 mA per channel, ensuring compatibility with a range of condenser microphones. In terms of connectivity, both the EVO 8 and EVO 4 utilize a USB-C host connection and adhere to the USB 2.0 protocol, providing reliable performance and compatibility with various devices. However, neither interface includes digital audio I/O, sync I/O, network I/O, or MIDI I/O options, which may limit their functionality for some users.
In summary, the choice between the Audient EVO 8 and EVO 4 ultimately depends on the user's specific requirements. The EVO 8 is ideal for those needing more inputs and outputs for complex audio tasks, while the EVO 4 is a compact solution for simpler setups with fewer input needs.

Performance
Frequency Response
Mic Inputs: 10 Hz to 40 kHz ±0.5 dB Line, Hi-Z Inputs: 10 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.5 dB A/D Converters: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB D/A Converters: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB Headphone Outputs: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB	Mic, Line Inputs: 10 Hz to 40 kHz ±0.5 dB Hi-Z Inputs: 10 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.5 dB A/D Converters: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB D/A Converters: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB Headphone Outputs: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB
Maximum Input Level
Mic Inputs: +16 dBu Hi-Z Inputs: +10 dBu	Mic/Line Inputs: +16 dBu Hi-Z Inputs: +10 dBu
Maximum Output Level
D/A Converters: +11 dBu	D/A Converters: +11 dBu Headphone Outputs: +10.1 dBu (600-Ohm Load)
Headphone Output Power
45 mW into 30 Ohms (Max) 52 mW into 60 Ohms (Max) 20 mW into 600 Ohms (Max)	45 mW into 30 Ohms (Max) 52 mW into 60 Ohms (Max) 20 mW into 600 Ohms (Max)
Impedance
Mic Inputs: > 3 Kilohms (Balanced) Line Inputs: > 10 Kilohms (Balanced) Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohm (Unbalanced)	Mic Inputs: > 3 Kilohms (Balanced) Line Inputs: > 10 Kilohms (Balanced) Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohm (Unbalanced) Line Outputs: < 100 Ohms (Balanced) Headphone Outputs: < 50 Ohms (Unbalanced)
Dynamic Range
AD/DA Converters: 113 dBA	AD/DA Converters: 113 dBA Headphone Outputs: 113 dBA
SNR
Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs: 100 dB	Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs: 100 dB
THD+N
A/D Converters: < 0.001% (1 kHz, at -1 dBFS) D/A Converters: < 0.0015% (1 kHz, at -1 dBFS) Headphone Outputs: < 0.0015% (1 kHz, at -1 dBFS) Hi-Z Inputs: < 0.3% (1 kHz) Mic/Line Inputs: < 0.0015% (1 kHz)	Mic/Line Inputs: < 0.0015% (1 kHz) Hi-Z Inputs: < 0.3% (1 kHz) D/A Converters: < 0.0015% (1 kHz, at -1 dBFS) Headphone Outputs: < 0.0015% (1 kHz, at -1 dBFS)
EIN
Mic/Line Inputs: < -128 dB	Mic/Line Inputs: < -128 dBu
CMRR
Mic/Line Inputs: > 85 dB	Mic/Line Inputs: > 85 dB (1 kHz)

The Audient EVO 8 Desktop 4x4 USB Type-C Audio Interface and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface share several specifications, but there are notable differences that cater to different user needs.
In terms of frequency response, both interfaces provide a similar range for mic inputs, from 10 Hz to 40 kHz with a tolerance of ±0.5 dB, while the Hi-Z inputs for the EVO 8 have a slightly broader response at 10 Hz to 20 kHz compared to the EVO 4. Both devices feature high-quality A/D and D/A converters, ensuring accurate audio reproduction across the same frequency range.
When it comes to maximum input levels, both models exhibit the same specifications for mic and Hi-Z inputs, with maximum levels of +16 dBu and +10 dBu respectively. However, the EVO 8 boasts additional line inputs, which may be advantageous for users requiring more flexible input options. Regarding output levels, the maximum output for D/A converters remains consistent at +11 dBu for both interfaces, ensuring reliable audio delivery.
For headphone output power, both interfaces provide similar performance with a maximum of 45 mW into 30 Ohms and 52 mW into 60 Ohms, with a lower output of 20 mW into 600 Ohms. Impedance levels for mic and Hi-Z inputs are also consistent across both models, providing balanced input options.
Dynamic range, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and total harmonic distortion plus noise (THD+N) are comparable, with both interfaces maintaining a dynamic range of 113 dBA and SNR of 100 dB for mic, line, and Hi-Z inputs. However, the EVO 4 features a slightly better THD+N rating for A/D converters at <0.001%, while the EVO 8 maintains <0.0015% for mic and line inputs, making it an excellent choice for precise recording.
In summary, the Audient EVO 8 offers enhanced input flexibility with its additional line inputs, making it suitable for users with more extensive audio routing needs. In contrast, the Audient EVO 4 provides a compact solution with high-performance specifications, ideal for simpler setups or mobile recording environments.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
Up to 96 kHz	44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 kHz
Sample Rate Conversion

Bit Depths
Up to 24-Bit	Up to 24-Bit
Latency
5 ms at 44.1 kHz (Dependent on Buffer Size, Input to Output) 4.1 ms at 96 kHz (Dependent on Buffer Size, Input to Output)	5 ms at 44.1 kHz (Dependent on Buffer Size, Input to Output) 4.1 ms at 96 kHz (Dependent on Buffer Size, Input to Output)
Sync Sources
Internal	Internal

The Audient EVO 8 Desktop 4x4 USB Type-C Audio Interface and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface offer similar features, catering to different needs within the audio production landscape. Both interfaces support a maximum sample rate of up to 96 kHz and utilize a bit depth of up to 24-Bit, ensuring high-fidelity audio capture and playback. Neither model includes sample rate conversion, maintaining a straightforward approach to audio processing.
When it comes to latency, both the EVO 8 and EVO 4 exhibit comparable performance, with latency figures of 5 ms at 44.1 kHz and 4.1 ms at 96 kHz, which is dependent on buffer size. This low latency is crucial for real-time monitoring and recording sessions, making both interfaces suitable for professional and home studio environments.
In terms of connectivity, the EVO 8 provides a more extensive input/output configuration with its 4x4 capabilities, allowing for greater flexibility in recording multiple sources simultaneously. In contrast, the EVO 4 is designed for more compact setups, making it ideal for solo artists or smaller projects. Both interfaces feature internal sync sources, ensuring stable operation and synchronization during recording and playback. Overall, the choice between the two models will largely depend on the user's specific requirements for channel count and connectivity.

Audio Storage & Playback
Memory Card Slot

When comparing the Audient EVO 8 Desktop 4x4 USB Type-C Audio Interface and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface, both models share a common feature regarding memory card slots, as neither unit includes this functionality.
The Audient EVO 8 is designed with a more extensive input and output configuration, offering a 4x4 setup that allows for greater flexibility in connecting multiple audio sources and outputs. This is particularly beneficial for users who require additional channels for recording instruments or vocals simultaneously. In contrast, the Audient EVO 4 provides a more compact 2x2 configuration, making it ideal for solo musicians or podcasters who need a straightforward interface without the added complexity of multiple inputs.
In terms of build quality, both interfaces maintain the high standards typical of Audient products, featuring a durable design and user-friendly layout. However, the EVO 8's additional features, such as more inputs and outputs, can cater to more extensive recording setups, while the EVO 4's simplicity allows for quick and easy operation, appealing to those who may be newer to audio recording or need a portable solution.
Both interfaces utilize USB-C connectivity, ensuring fast data transfer speeds and compatibility with modern devices. This commonality means that users of either model can enjoy low latency and high-quality audio performance. Ultimately, the choice between the Audient EVO 8 and the Audient EVO 4 will depend largely on the user's specific needs regarding channel count and complexity in their audio setup.

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.7.5 or Later Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit) 6 or Later	macOS 10.7.5 or Later Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit)
Processor Requirement
Mac: Intel PC: 1.6 GHz Intel Core 2 AMD	Mac: Intel PC: 1.6 GHz Intel Core 2
RAM Requirements
1 GB	1 GB
Required Hardware
Available USB 2.0 Port USB Cable (Included)	Available USB 2.0 Port USB Cable (Included)
Internet Connection
Required for Registration, Software/Driver Download	Required for Software/Driver Download

The Audient EVO 8 and Audient EVO 4 are both USB-C audio interfaces designed to cater to different user needs, showcasing impressive compatibility and performance features.
The Audient EVO 8 Desktop 4x4 USB Type-C Audio Interface is compatible with macOS 10.7.5 or later and Windows 7 or later (32-/64-Bit), requiring an Intel processor for Mac and a 1.6 GHz Intel Core 2 processor for PC. It mandates a minimum of 1 GB RAM and necessitates an available USB 2.0 port. The device does not support mobile device compatibility and comes with a USB cable included in the package. An internet connection is essential for downloading software and drivers.
Conversely, the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface shares similar OS compatibility with macOS 10.7.5 or later and Windows 7 or later (32-/64-Bit) and also requires an Intel processor or an AMD processor for PC users. It too requires a minimum of 1 GB RAM and an available USB 2.0 port, with a USB cable included. However, it differs slightly in that an internet connection is needed for registration as well as software and driver downloads.
In summary, both interfaces provide robust functionality and compatibility for audio recording and production. The EVO 8 offers a more extensive input/output configuration, being a 4x4 interface, while the EVO 4 is more compact, making it suitable for simpler setups. Their requirements and compatibility features are largely similar, making either choice a reliable option depending on the user's specific needs.

Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

The Audient EVO 8 Desktop 4x4 USB Type-C Audio Interface and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface share similarities in their power requirements, as both devices are powered through USB Bus Power. This feature allows for convenient connectivity without the need for an external power supply, making both interfaces highly portable and user-friendly for recording on the go.
In terms of connectivity, the Audient EVO 8 offers more extensive input/output options compared to the EVO 4. The EVO 8 provides four inputs and four outputs, making it suitable for larger recording setups or for users requiring more flexibility in their audio routing. Conversely, the EVO 4 is designed with two inputs and two outputs, which caters to smaller projects or home studios where fewer channels are sufficient.
Both interfaces incorporate the same advanced audio quality and low-latency performance that Audient is known for. They feature the EVO Interactive Audio Engine, which enhances the recording experience by providing smart gain features and easy monitoring options. However, the EVO 8's additional channels and outputs make it a more versatile option for users with broader recording needs.
In summary, while both the Audient EVO 8 and EVO 4 utilize USB Bus Power for convenience, the choice between them ultimately comes down to the number of inputs and outputs required for your specific recording applications. The EVO 8 is ideal for more complex setups, while the EVO 4 serves well for simpler, straightforward recording needs.

Physical
Dimensions
5.51 x 2.64 x 2.64" / 14 x 6.71 x 6.71 cm	7.48 x 2.76 x 2.76" / 19 x 7 x 7 cm
Weight
12.7 oz / 360.0 g	1.0 lb / 0.5 kg

The Audient EVO 8 and Audient EVO 4 audio interfaces offer distinct features tailored for different user needs while maintaining high audio quality. In terms of dimensions, the EVO 8 measures 7.48 x 2.76 x 2.76 inches (19 x 7 x 7 cm) and weighs 1.0 lb (0.5 kg), making it slightly larger and heavier than the EVO 4, which measures 5.51 x 2.64 x 2.64 inches (14 x 6.71 x 6.71 cm) and weighs 12.7 oz (360.0 g). This size difference may influence portability, with the EVO 4 being more suitable for mobile setups or tighter spaces.
When it comes to input and output capabilities, the EVO 8 offers a more extensive configuration with its 4x4 setup, allowing for four inputs and four outputs, making it ideal for larger recording sessions or more complex setups. In contrast, the EVO 4 provides a 2x2 configuration, catering to solo musicians or podcasters who require fewer inputs and outputs. This difference significantly impacts usability depending on the user’s requirements, where the EVO 8 accommodates more extensive projects, while the EVO 4 is streamlined for simplicity and efficiency.
Both interfaces utilize USB Type-C connectivity, ensuring fast data transfer and compatibility with modern devices. However, potential users should consider their specific needs in terms of input/output options and physical dimensions when choosing between the two. The Audient EVO 8 is better suited for users looking for versatility in recording multiple sources simultaneously, whereas the EVO 4 is an excellent choice for those who prefer portability and ease of use without sacrificing audio quality.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
1.29 lb	1.79 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
6.8 x 3.85 x 3.55"	9.1 x 4.2 x 3.6"

When comparing the Audient EVO 8 Desktop 4x4 USB Type-C Audio Interface and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface, notable differences arise in their specifications and dimensions, affecting their portability and usability in various settings.
The Audient EVO 8 features a package weight of 1.79 lb and box dimensions of 9.1 x 4.2 x 3.6". This slightly heavier and larger design can accommodate more input and output options, making it suitable for users requiring additional connectivity for multiple instruments or microphones. The EVO 8 is ideal for more complex setups, offering versatility for both home studios and mobile recording sessions.
In contrast, the Audient EVO 4 is more compact with a package weight of 1.29 lb and box dimensions of 6.8 x 3.85 x 3.55". This lightweight and smaller form factor enhances its portability, making it an excellent choice for musicians on the go or those with limited desk space. The EVO 4 is designed for simplicity and convenience, appealing to users who need a straightforward audio interface without compromising on quality.
Overall, the choice between the Audient EVO 8 and the Audient EVO 4 comes down to the user's specific needs regarding size, weight, and input/output capabilities. The EVO 8 caters to those requiring more extensive features, while the EVO 4 is perfect for individuals seeking a portable and user-friendly audio interface.