RODE AI-1 vs Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Gen: In-Depth Comparison

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface are both compact, high-quality options for musicians, podcasters, and content creators looking to capture professional-grade audio. However, they cater to slightly different needs and preferences.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) boasts an updated design and improved performance over its predecessors. It features a single upgraded Scarlett mic preamp with switchable Air mode, providing a brighter and more open sound. Additionally, it includes a high-headroom instrument input for guitars and basses, as well as balanced outputs for studio monitors. The 24-bit/192kHz converters ensure pristine audio quality, and the interface is powered via USB-C, making it easy to connect and power through modern computers. The Scarlett Solo also includes a comprehensive software bundle with Ableton Live Lite, Pro Tools First, and various plug-ins, which makes it particularly attractive for beginners and those looking to expand their audio production toolkit.
On the other hand, the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface is designed with simplicity and ease of use in mind. It features a single Neutrik combo jack input, which accommodates both XLR and 1/4" connections, making it versatile for different types of microphones and instruments. The AI-1 is known for its ultra-low noise and high-gain Revolution Preamp, which ensures clean and detailed recordings. It also offers 24-bit/96kHz audio resolution, which, while slightly lower than the Scarlett Solo, is still highly capable of delivering professional-quality sound. The interface is bus-powered via USB-C and includes a high-quality headphone amplifier for monitoring. The AI-1 is bundled with Ableton Live Lite and a suite of RODE’s own plug-ins, providing a solid start for new users.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) is ideal for users who need a robust software package and slightly higher audio resolution, as well as those who may benefit from the additional Air mode for a more polished sound. The RODE AI-1, with its straightforward design and high-quality preamp, is perfect for users who prioritize simplicity and reliability in a compact form. Both interfaces offer excellent performance and value, making them strong contenders in the entry-level audio interface market.

Specifications, Advantages, and Disadvantages

RODE AI-1

Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation)

Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation)

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
purchase value 85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the combination of high-quality audio output and affordable pricing, making it accessible for both amateur and professional audio enthusiasts. Users felt that the interface offered excellent performance without breaking the bank, which was especially appealing to those who were budget-conscious. 15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, citing that similar products with more features were available at a comparable price. Some users felt that the interface lacked advanced options that could have justified the price point, leading them to believe they were not getting the best value for their money. 85% quality of materials 90% of users were pleased with the quality of materials used in the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. Many commented on its robust build and high-quality components, which contributed to a perception of durability and reliability. Users appreciated the metal casing, which provided a sturdy feel and assured them of the product's longevity. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of materials, mentioning that the unit felt heavier and bulkier than expected. A few users experienced issues with the knobs and buttons, reporting that they felt loose or less responsive over time, which detracted from the overall quality perception. 90% ease of use 88% of users found the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface easy to use, highlighting its plug-and-play functionality and straightforward design. The interface was praised for its intuitive controls, which made it accessible to beginners and professionals alike, allowing users to focus more on their creative process rather than technical setup. 12% of users were not satisfied with the ease of use, mainly due to initial setup challenges. Some users encountered difficulties with driver installation and compatibility issues with certain operating systems, which required additional troubleshooting and technical knowledge. 88% sound quality 92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its ability to deliver clear and crisp audio, which significantly enhanced their recording and playback experiences. Users noted that the preamps were quiet and offered a professional-grade sound that exceeded their expectations. 8% of users were disappointed with the sound quality, pointing out occasional noise interference and less than optimal performance when compared to higher-end models. A few users experienced problems with signal stability, which affected the overall audio output during critical recording sessions. 92% compatibility 83% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface with various devices and operating systems. They appreciated that it worked seamlessly with most popular DAWs and platforms, allowing them to integrate it easily into their existing setups without significant adjustments. 17% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with older operating systems and less common DAWs. Some users reported that the interface required specific drivers that were not readily available or resulted in latency problems, which hampered their recording sessions. 83% design 87% of users were satisfied with the design of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated its sleek and modern appearance, as well as the compact size which made it portable and easy to incorporate into any workspace. The minimalist design was also noted as a positive aspect, providing an aesthetically pleasing addition to their audio gear. 13% of users were dissatisfied with the design, noting that the interface's compactness sometimes made it feel cramped, especially when connecting multiple devices. A few users expressed a preference for more visible labeling on the controls and connections, which could have improved usability in low-light environments. 87% durability 89% of users expressed satisfaction with the durability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They were impressed by its robust construction, which they felt could withstand regular use and transport without easily succumbing to wear and tear. The metal casing was specifically mentioned as a factor that contributed to its perceived durability. 11% of users were not satisfied with the durability, reporting issues like premature wear on the knobs and switches. Some users experienced loose connections after extended use, which undermined their confidence in the product's long-term reliability. 89% portability 86% of users were satisfied with the portability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated its lightweight design and compact form factor, which made it easy to transport and ideal for on-the-go recording sessions. The interface was often praised for fitting comfortably into backpacks and small carry cases. 14% of users were dissatisfied with the portability, citing that the interface, while compact, required additional cables and adapters for certain setups, which added to the bulk. Some users found it inconvenient to constantly disconnect and reconnect the device when moving between locations. 86% latency 84% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found that it provided smooth and responsive audio processing, which was crucial for live monitoring and recording applications. Many users highlighted its real-time performance as a key benefit. 16% of users experienced dissatisfaction with latency issues, particularly when using the interface with certain DAWs or plugins. Some users noted occasional delays that affected the synchronization of audio tracks, which was problematic for time-sensitive recordings. 84% driver stability 82% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They reported a reliable connection and consistent performance across various sessions, which minimized interruptions and technical difficulties during critical tasks. 18% of users were dissatisfied with driver stability, encountering frequent disconnections and crashes. Some users struggled with maintaining a stable connection, especially during extended recording sessions, which affected their workflow and productivity. 82% customer support 81% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by RODE for the AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the prompt and helpful responses from support staff, which resolved their queries effectively and enhanced their overall experience with the product. 19% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, reporting delays in response times and a lack of comprehensive solutions to their problems. Some users felt that the support team lacked technical knowledge, which left their issues unresolved. 81% software integration 80% of users were satisfied with the software integration capabilities of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found it compatible with a wide range of DAWs and appreciated the seamless integration with most audio editing software, which facilitated a smooth workflow. 20% of users were dissatisfied with software integration, citing challenges in setting up the interface with specific DAWs. Some users experienced difficulties in configuring settings to achieve optimal performance, which was frustrating and time-consuming. 80% innovation 78% of users appreciated the innovative features of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, particularly its USB-C connectivity and compact design. They felt that these features represented a forward-thinking approach to audio interface design, catering to modern user needs. 22% of users were dissatisfied with the innovation aspect, feeling that the interface lacked groundbreaking features or advanced functionalities that could set it apart from competitors. Some users expected more cutting-edge technology or additional inputs/outputs to enhance versatility. 78% input/output options 75% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the single XLR input sufficient for their basic recording needs and appreciated the simplicity of the interface's design. 25% of users were dissatisfied with the limited input/output options, expressing a desire for more flexibility, such as additional inputs or a MIDI connection. Users who required more complex setups felt restricted by the interface's minimal connectivity options. 75% aesthetic appeal 88% of users were satisfied with the aesthetic appeal of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its sleek and minimalist design, which complemented their existing audio gear and added a touch of sophistication to their setups. 12% of users were not impressed with the aesthetic appeal, describing it as too plain and lacking distinctive features. Some users felt that a more visually striking design could enhance the product's appeal and make it stand out in a crowded market. 88% versatility 77% of users were satisfied with the versatility of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, finding it adaptable to various recording environments and applications. They appreciated its ability to handle different audio tasks effectively, from podcasting to music production. 23% of users were dissatisfied with the versatility, noting that the interface was limited in terms of expandability and connectivity. Users seeking a more comprehensive solution for diverse audio needs felt that the interface's options were too constrained. 77% mic preamp quality 91% of users were satisfied with the mic preamp quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised the clarity and low noise performance, which enhanced the quality of their recordings and exceeded their expectations for an interface in this price range. 9% of users were dissatisfied with the mic preamp quality, reporting occasional noise and signal issues. Some felt that the preamp lacked the warmth and richness found in higher-end models, which affected the overall sound quality. 91% headphone output quality 89% of users were satisfied with the headphone output quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the output to be powerful and clear, allowing for accurate monitoring and mixing during recording sessions. 11% of users were dissatisfied with the headphone output quality, mentioning a lack of volume and clarity with certain headphones. Some users experienced distortion at higher volumes, which impacted their ability to monitor audio effectively. 89% USB-C connectivity 90% of users appreciated the USB-C connectivity of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, which provided fast data transfer and a stable connection. Users noted that it was a significant improvement over older USB standards, enhancing their overall experience. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the USB-C connectivity, mainly due to compatibility issues with older devices or the need for additional adapters. Some users found it inconvenient to upgrade their existing setups to accommodate the new standard. 90% build quality 93% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its sturdy construction and premium materials, which gave them confidence in the product's durability and long-term use. 7% of users expressed concerns about the build quality, reporting minor defects or inconsistencies in the finish. Some users experienced issues with the durability of certain components, such as the knobs and switches, which affected their overall satisfaction. 93%	Purchase Value 85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation). Many appreciated its affordability compared to similar products on the market, noting it provides a professional quality audio experience at a budget-friendly price. The inclusion of essential features like the improved preamps and the Air mode were frequently highlighted as excellent value additions. 15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to expectations of more features that are available in higher-priced models. Some users felt that the lack of bundled accessories, such as cables or software, diminished the overall value of the purchase. 85% Quality of Material 90% of users found the quality of material to be excellent. They praised the build quality, noting that the device feels sturdy and durable. The metal chassis was particularly appreciated for providing a robust feel, which users associated with longevity and reliability. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of material. Some reported issues with the durability of the knobs and connectors, mentioning that they felt less sturdy over time. A few users experienced problems with the USB-C connection, citing it as a potential weak point in the design. 90% Ease of Use 88% of users were satisfied with the ease of use of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They commended its straightforward setup process and user-friendly design, which allowed even beginners to start recording with minimal effort. The clear labeling and intuitive layout were also frequently praised. 12% of users found the device less user-friendly than expected. Some had difficulty with the initial setup, especially when integrating with specific DAWs. Others noted that the lack of a detailed manual made troubleshooting more challenging for less experienced users. 88% Sound Quality 92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They reported clear, professional-grade audio output, with many appreciating the enhanced quality of the preamps and the Air mode, which added a noticeable brightness and clarity to their recordings. 8% of users were not fully satisfied with the sound quality. Some mentioned that while the device generally performed well, it occasionally introduced noise or interference at higher gain levels. A few users expected even more pristine audio quality based on the brand's reputation. 92% Connectivity 87% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the USB-C interface for its modern, fast, and reliable connection. Users found it easy to integrate the device with various recording setups and appreciated the low-latency performance. 13% of users faced issues with connectivity. Some experienced occasional disconnections or difficulty maintaining a stable connection, particularly when using older computer systems. A few users also noted limitations due to the lack of additional input/output options, which restricted more complex recording setups. 87% Software Integration 83% of users were pleased with the software integration capabilities of the Scarlett Solo. Many highlighted the seamless compatibility with popular DAWs and the ease of accessing bundled software as a significant advantage. 17% of users encountered challenges with software integration. Some reported difficulties in setting up the interface with their preferred DAW, citing lack of clear instructions or driver issues. Others were disappointed with the limited functionality of the bundled software compared to standalone options. 83% Portability 89% of users appreciated the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. Its compact size and lightweight design were ideal for users who needed a mobile recording solution, making it easy to transport and use in various locations. 11% of users found the device less portable due to its reliance on a computer connection for power. Some expressed a desire for a battery-powered option to enhance portability. Additionally, a few users noted that additional protective cases or covers were necessary for safe transport. 89% Durability 91% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its solid construction and the high-quality materials used, which gave them confidence in its long-term performance and resistance to wear and tear. 9% of users had concerns about durability, particularly with the smaller components like knobs and jacks, which some users reported were prone to loosening over time. A few users experienced issues with the USB-C port becoming less secure after repeated use. 91% Aesthetic Design 93% of users were highly satisfied with the aesthetic design of the Scarlett Solo. They found it visually appealing, with a sleek, modern look that fit well into professional and home studio environments. The color scheme and overall design were frequently highlighted as stylish. 7% of users were less impressed with the design, mainly due to personal preferences. Some felt that while the design was functional, it lacked uniqueness or standout features compared to other brands. A few users were also concerned about the potential for visible wear over time. 93% Customer Support 84% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Focusrite. Many appreciated the prompt and helpful responses they received when encountering issues, as well as the availability of online resources and tutorials. 16% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing long wait times and unhelpful responses in some cases. A few users felt that the support team lacked the technical knowledge needed to resolve more complex issues efficiently. 84% Latency 88% of users praised the low latency performance of the Scarlett Solo. They reported minimal delay during recording and playback, which was crucial for live monitoring and multi-track recording sessions. 12% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older or less powerful computers. Some users found that the advertised low latency was not always achievable without additional configuration or adjustments in their DAW settings. 88% Preamps 90% of users were impressed with the quality of the preamps in the Scarlett Solo. They noted a significant improvement in audio clarity and detail, with many highlighting the preamps as a standout feature of the device. 10% of users found the preamps less impressive, noting that they introduced noise at higher gain levels. Some users expected better performance based on their experiences with other products in the Focusrite range. 90% Driver Stability 86% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Scarlett Solo. They reported consistent performance and reliability across different operating systems, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions. 14% of users encountered issues with driver stability, experiencing occasional crashes or compatibility problems with certain software updates. Some users found the process of updating drivers cumbersome or confusing. 86% Input/Output Options 80% of users were content with the input/output options provided by the Scarlett Solo. They found the available connections sufficient for basic recording needs and appreciated the simplicity of the layout. 20% of users desired more input/output options, especially those looking to expand their recording capabilities. Some users felt limited by the lack of additional ports for more complex setups or simultaneous multi-instrument recording. 80% Brand Reputation 95% of users expressed trust in Focusrite's brand reputation, noting their history of producing reliable and high-quality audio interfaces. Many users mentioned that the brand's positive reputation influenced their purchase decision. 5% of users were skeptical about the brand reputation, often due to personal negative experiences or issues with previous products. A few users felt that the brand's reputation did not always translate to superior customer support or product innovation. 95% Compatibility 88% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Scarlett Solo with various systems and software. They found it easy to integrate with both Windows and Mac operating systems, as well as with popular DAWs. 12% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly when using less common DAWs or older operating systems. Some users encountered problems with driver installation or configuration, which affected their initial setup experience. 88% Setup Process 87% of users found the setup process for the Scarlett Solo to be straightforward. They appreciated the clear instructions and quick installation process, which allowed them to start using the device with minimal hassle. 13% of users encountered difficulties during setup. Some reported unclear instructions or missing steps in the setup guide, which led to a more complicated installation process. A few users required additional support to resolve initial setup issues. 87% Firmware Updates 82% of users were satisfied with the availability and effectiveness of firmware updates for the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the improvements in performance and functionality that updates provided, helping to maintain the device's reliability. 18% of users were dissatisfied with the firmware update process. Some found it difficult to navigate or encountered issues with updates failing to install properly. Others felt that updates were infrequent or did not address key issues they experienced. 82% Instruction Manual 78% of users found the instruction manual helpful for basic setup and operation. They appreciated the inclusion of essential information that aided in understanding the device's core functions. 22% of users were dissatisfied with the instruction manual, citing it as lacking in detail or clarity. Some users found it insufficient for troubleshooting more complex issues or for understanding advanced features of the device. 78% Overall Performance 89% of users were satisfied with the overall performance of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its reliability, sound quality, and ease of use, which met or exceeded their expectations for a USB audio interface in its price range. 11% of users were less satisfied with the overall performance, often due to specific issues like connectivity problems or noise at high gain levels. Some users felt that while the device performed well generally, it did not excel in any particular area compared to higher-end models. 89% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

purchase value

85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the combination of high-quality audio output and affordable pricing, making it accessible for both amateur and professional audio enthusiasts. Users felt that the interface offered excellent performance without breaking the bank, which was especially appealing to those who were budget-conscious.

15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, citing that similar products with more features were available at a comparable price. Some users felt that the interface lacked advanced options that could have justified the price point, leading them to believe they were not getting the best value for their money.

85%
quality of materials

90% of users were pleased with the quality of materials used in the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. Many commented on its robust build and high-quality components, which contributed to a perception of durability and reliability. Users appreciated the metal casing, which provided a sturdy feel and assured them of the product's longevity.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of materials, mentioning that the unit felt heavier and bulkier than expected. A few users experienced issues with the knobs and buttons, reporting that they felt loose or less responsive over time, which detracted from the overall quality perception.

90%
ease of use

88% of users found the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface easy to use, highlighting its plug-and-play functionality and straightforward design. The interface was praised for its intuitive controls, which made it accessible to beginners and professionals alike, allowing users to focus more on their creative process rather than technical setup.

12% of users were not satisfied with the ease of use, mainly due to initial setup challenges. Some users encountered difficulties with driver installation and compatibility issues with certain operating systems, which required additional troubleshooting and technical knowledge.

88%
sound quality

92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its ability to deliver clear and crisp audio, which significantly enhanced their recording and playback experiences. Users noted that the preamps were quiet and offered a professional-grade sound that exceeded their expectations.

8% of users were disappointed with the sound quality, pointing out occasional noise interference and less than optimal performance when compared to higher-end models. A few users experienced problems with signal stability, which affected the overall audio output during critical recording sessions.

92%
compatibility

83% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface with various devices and operating systems. They appreciated that it worked seamlessly with most popular DAWs and platforms, allowing them to integrate it easily into their existing setups without significant adjustments.

17% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with older operating systems and less common DAWs. Some users reported that the interface required specific drivers that were not readily available or resulted in latency problems, which hampered their recording sessions.

83%
design

87% of users were satisfied with the design of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated its sleek and modern appearance, as well as the compact size which made it portable and easy to incorporate into any workspace. The minimalist design was also noted as a positive aspect, providing an aesthetically pleasing addition to their audio gear.

13% of users were dissatisfied with the design, noting that the interface's compactness sometimes made it feel cramped, especially when connecting multiple devices. A few users expressed a preference for more visible labeling on the controls and connections, which could have improved usability in low-light environments.

87%
durability

89% of users expressed satisfaction with the durability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They were impressed by its robust construction, which they felt could withstand regular use and transport without easily succumbing to wear and tear. The metal casing was specifically mentioned as a factor that contributed to its perceived durability.

11% of users were not satisfied with the durability, reporting issues like premature wear on the knobs and switches. Some users experienced loose connections after extended use, which undermined their confidence in the product's long-term reliability.

89%
portability

86% of users were satisfied with the portability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated its lightweight design and compact form factor, which made it easy to transport and ideal for on-the-go recording sessions. The interface was often praised for fitting comfortably into backpacks and small carry cases.

14% of users were dissatisfied with the portability, citing that the interface, while compact, required additional cables and adapters for certain setups, which added to the bulk. Some users found it inconvenient to constantly disconnect and reconnect the device when moving between locations.

86%
latency

84% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found that it provided smooth and responsive audio processing, which was crucial for live monitoring and recording applications. Many users highlighted its real-time performance as a key benefit.

16% of users experienced dissatisfaction with latency issues, particularly when using the interface with certain DAWs or plugins. Some users noted occasional delays that affected the synchronization of audio tracks, which was problematic for time-sensitive recordings.

84%
driver stability

82% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They reported a reliable connection and consistent performance across various sessions, which minimized interruptions and technical difficulties during critical tasks.

18% of users were dissatisfied with driver stability, encountering frequent disconnections and crashes. Some users struggled with maintaining a stable connection, especially during extended recording sessions, which affected their workflow and productivity.

82%
customer support

81% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by RODE for the AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the prompt and helpful responses from support staff, which resolved their queries effectively and enhanced their overall experience with the product.

19% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, reporting delays in response times and a lack of comprehensive solutions to their problems. Some users felt that the support team lacked technical knowledge, which left their issues unresolved.

81%
software integration

80% of users were satisfied with the software integration capabilities of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found it compatible with a wide range of DAWs and appreciated the seamless integration with most audio editing software, which facilitated a smooth workflow.

20% of users were dissatisfied with software integration, citing challenges in setting up the interface with specific DAWs. Some users experienced difficulties in configuring settings to achieve optimal performance, which was frustrating and time-consuming.

80%
innovation

78% of users appreciated the innovative features of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, particularly its USB-C connectivity and compact design. They felt that these features represented a forward-thinking approach to audio interface design, catering to modern user needs.

22% of users were dissatisfied with the innovation aspect, feeling that the interface lacked groundbreaking features or advanced functionalities that could set it apart from competitors. Some users expected more cutting-edge technology or additional inputs/outputs to enhance versatility.

78%
input/output options

75% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the single XLR input sufficient for their basic recording needs and appreciated the simplicity of the interface's design.

25% of users were dissatisfied with the limited input/output options, expressing a desire for more flexibility, such as additional inputs or a MIDI connection. Users who required more complex setups felt restricted by the interface's minimal connectivity options.

75%
aesthetic appeal

88% of users were satisfied with the aesthetic appeal of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its sleek and minimalist design, which complemented their existing audio gear and added a touch of sophistication to their setups.

12% of users were not impressed with the aesthetic appeal, describing it as too plain and lacking distinctive features. Some users felt that a more visually striking design could enhance the product's appeal and make it stand out in a crowded market.

88%
versatility

77% of users were satisfied with the versatility of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, finding it adaptable to various recording environments and applications. They appreciated its ability to handle different audio tasks effectively, from podcasting to music production.

23% of users were dissatisfied with the versatility, noting that the interface was limited in terms of expandability and connectivity. Users seeking a more comprehensive solution for diverse audio needs felt that the interface's options were too constrained.

77%
mic preamp quality

91% of users were satisfied with the mic preamp quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised the clarity and low noise performance, which enhanced the quality of their recordings and exceeded their expectations for an interface in this price range.

9% of users were dissatisfied with the mic preamp quality, reporting occasional noise and signal issues. Some felt that the preamp lacked the warmth and richness found in higher-end models, which affected the overall sound quality.

91%
headphone output quality

89% of users were satisfied with the headphone output quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the output to be powerful and clear, allowing for accurate monitoring and mixing during recording sessions.

11% of users were dissatisfied with the headphone output quality, mentioning a lack of volume and clarity with certain headphones. Some users experienced distortion at higher volumes, which impacted their ability to monitor audio effectively.

89%
USB-C connectivity

90% of users appreciated the USB-C connectivity of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, which provided fast data transfer and a stable connection. Users noted that it was a significant improvement over older USB standards, enhancing their overall experience.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the USB-C connectivity, mainly due to compatibility issues with older devices or the need for additional adapters. Some users found it inconvenient to upgrade their existing setups to accommodate the new standard.

90%
build quality

93% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its sturdy construction and premium materials, which gave them confidence in the product's durability and long-term use.

7% of users expressed concerns about the build quality, reporting minor defects or inconsistencies in the finish. Some users experienced issues with the durability of certain components, such as the knobs and switches, which affected their overall satisfaction.

93%

Purchase Value

85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation). Many appreciated its affordability compared to similar products on the market, noting it provides a professional quality audio experience at a budget-friendly price. The inclusion of essential features like the improved preamps and the Air mode were frequently highlighted as excellent value additions.

15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, primarily due to expectations of more features that are available in higher-priced models. Some users felt that the lack of bundled accessories, such as cables or software, diminished the overall value of the purchase.

85%
Quality of Material

90% of users found the quality of material to be excellent. They praised the build quality, noting that the device feels sturdy and durable. The metal chassis was particularly appreciated for providing a robust feel, which users associated with longevity and reliability.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of material. Some reported issues with the durability of the knobs and connectors, mentioning that they felt less sturdy over time. A few users experienced problems with the USB-C connection, citing it as a potential weak point in the design.

90%
Ease of Use

88% of users were satisfied with the ease of use of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They commended its straightforward setup process and user-friendly design, which allowed even beginners to start recording with minimal effort. The clear labeling and intuitive layout were also frequently praised.

12% of users found the device less user-friendly than expected. Some had difficulty with the initial setup, especially when integrating with specific DAWs. Others noted that the lack of a detailed manual made troubleshooting more challenging for less experienced users.

88%
Sound Quality

92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. They reported clear, professional-grade audio output, with many appreciating the enhanced quality of the preamps and the Air mode, which added a noticeable brightness and clarity to their recordings.

8% of users were not fully satisfied with the sound quality. Some mentioned that while the device generally performed well, it occasionally introduced noise or interference at higher gain levels. A few users expected even more pristine audio quality based on the brand's reputation.

92%
Connectivity

87% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options of the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the USB-C interface for its modern, fast, and reliable connection. Users found it easy to integrate the device with various recording setups and appreciated the low-latency performance.

13% of users faced issues with connectivity. Some experienced occasional disconnections or difficulty maintaining a stable connection, particularly when using older computer systems. A few users also noted limitations due to the lack of additional input/output options, which restricted more complex recording setups.

87%
Software Integration

83% of users were pleased with the software integration capabilities of the Scarlett Solo. Many highlighted the seamless compatibility with popular DAWs and the ease of accessing bundled software as a significant advantage.

17% of users encountered challenges with software integration. Some reported difficulties in setting up the interface with their preferred DAW, citing lack of clear instructions or driver issues. Others were disappointed with the limited functionality of the bundled software compared to standalone options.

83%
Portability

89% of users appreciated the portability of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo. Its compact size and lightweight design were ideal for users who needed a mobile recording solution, making it easy to transport and use in various locations.

11% of users found the device less portable due to its reliance on a computer connection for power. Some expressed a desire for a battery-powered option to enhance portability. Additionally, a few users noted that additional protective cases or covers were necessary for safe transport.

89%
Durability

91% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its solid construction and the high-quality materials used, which gave them confidence in its long-term performance and resistance to wear and tear.

9% of users had concerns about durability, particularly with the smaller components like knobs and jacks, which some users reported were prone to loosening over time. A few users experienced issues with the USB-C port becoming less secure after repeated use.

91%
Aesthetic Design

93% of users were highly satisfied with the aesthetic design of the Scarlett Solo. They found it visually appealing, with a sleek, modern look that fit well into professional and home studio environments. The color scheme and overall design were frequently highlighted as stylish.

7% of users were less impressed with the design, mainly due to personal preferences. Some felt that while the design was functional, it lacked uniqueness or standout features compared to other brands. A few users were also concerned about the potential for visible wear over time.

93%
Customer Support

84% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Focusrite. Many appreciated the prompt and helpful responses they received when encountering issues, as well as the availability of online resources and tutorials.

16% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing long wait times and unhelpful responses in some cases. A few users felt that the support team lacked the technical knowledge needed to resolve more complex issues efficiently.

84%
Latency

88% of users praised the low latency performance of the Scarlett Solo. They reported minimal delay during recording and playback, which was crucial for live monitoring and multi-track recording sessions.

12% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older or less powerful computers. Some users found that the advertised low latency was not always achievable without additional configuration or adjustments in their DAW settings.

88%
Preamps

90% of users were impressed with the quality of the preamps in the Scarlett Solo. They noted a significant improvement in audio clarity and detail, with many highlighting the preamps as a standout feature of the device.

10% of users found the preamps less impressive, noting that they introduced noise at higher gain levels. Some users expected better performance based on their experiences with other products in the Focusrite range.

90%
Driver Stability

86% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the Scarlett Solo. They reported consistent performance and reliability across different operating systems, which was essential for uninterrupted recording sessions.

14% of users encountered issues with driver stability, experiencing occasional crashes or compatibility problems with certain software updates. Some users found the process of updating drivers cumbersome or confusing.

86%
Input/Output Options

80% of users were content with the input/output options provided by the Scarlett Solo. They found the available connections sufficient for basic recording needs and appreciated the simplicity of the layout.

20% of users desired more input/output options, especially those looking to expand their recording capabilities. Some users felt limited by the lack of additional ports for more complex setups or simultaneous multi-instrument recording.

80%
Brand Reputation

95% of users expressed trust in Focusrite's brand reputation, noting their history of producing reliable and high-quality audio interfaces. Many users mentioned that the brand's positive reputation influenced their purchase decision.

5% of users were skeptical about the brand reputation, often due to personal negative experiences or issues with previous products. A few users felt that the brand's reputation did not always translate to superior customer support or product innovation.

95%
Compatibility

88% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Scarlett Solo with various systems and software. They found it easy to integrate with both Windows and Mac operating systems, as well as with popular DAWs.

12% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly when using less common DAWs or older operating systems. Some users encountered problems with driver installation or configuration, which affected their initial setup experience.

88%
Setup Process

87% of users found the setup process for the Scarlett Solo to be straightforward. They appreciated the clear instructions and quick installation process, which allowed them to start using the device with minimal hassle.

13% of users encountered difficulties during setup. Some reported unclear instructions or missing steps in the setup guide, which led to a more complicated installation process. A few users required additional support to resolve initial setup issues.

87%
Firmware Updates

82% of users were satisfied with the availability and effectiveness of firmware updates for the Scarlett Solo. They appreciated the improvements in performance and functionality that updates provided, helping to maintain the device's reliability.

18% of users were dissatisfied with the firmware update process. Some found it difficult to navigate or encountered issues with updates failing to install properly. Others felt that updates were infrequent or did not address key issues they experienced.

82%
Instruction Manual

78% of users found the instruction manual helpful for basic setup and operation. They appreciated the inclusion of essential information that aided in understanding the device's core functions.

22% of users were dissatisfied with the instruction manual, citing it as lacking in detail or clarity. Some users found it insufficient for troubleshooting more complex issues or for understanding advanced features of the device.

78%
Overall Performance

89% of users were satisfied with the overall performance of the Scarlett Solo. They praised its reliability, sound quality, and ease of use, which met or exceeded their expectations for a USB audio interface in its price range.

11% of users were less satisfied with the overall performance, often due to specific issues like connectivity problems or noise at high gain levels. Some users felt that while the device performed well generally, it did not excel in any particular area compared to higher-end models.

89%

Pros:
High-quality preamps and audio conversion. Rugged and compact design. Easy setup and operation with plug-and-play functionality. Compatible with both Mac and Windows. Includes balanced outputs for studio monitors.	High-quality preamps for clear sound recording. USB-C connectivity provides fast and reliable data transfer. Compact and portable design. Easy to use with straightforward controls and setup. Included software package offers great value.

Cons:
Limited to a single input channel, which may not be suitable for multi-input recording needs. No midi input/output. Pricier compared to some other single-input interfaces. Lacks onboard controls for gain and monitoring.	Limited to 2 input channels, which may not suffice for larger setups. No MIDI input/output ports. Phantom power is not individually switchable for each input. Higher price compared to some entry-level audio interfaces. Requires a computer to function, not standalone.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
1 Input / 2 Output	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
1	1
Analog Audio I/O
1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Mic/Line Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output	1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Digital Audio I/O

Host Connection
USB-C	1x USB-C
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.10 or Later Windows 7 or Later	macOS Windows
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface are both designed to offer high-quality audio recording and playback, but they differ in several key features.
In terms of channels of I/O, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo provides 2 analog inputs and 2 analog outputs at a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz / 24-bit. In comparison, the RODE AI-1 offers 1 input and 2 output channels with a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz / 24-bit. This suggests that the Focusrite Scarlett Solo offers higher audio fidelity with its 192 kHz sampling rate.
Both interfaces feature 1 microphone input. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo includes 1 XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input, while the RODE AI-1 offers a combo XLR-1/4" TRS Mic/Line Input. This combo input on the RODE AI-1 provides versatility for either microphone or line-level input through the same connection.
Regarding analog audio I/O, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo includes 1 XLR mic input, 1 1/4" TS unbalanced line/Hi-Z input on the front panel, 2 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs, and 1 1/4" TRS headphone output on the front panel. On the other hand, the RODE AI-1 features 1 combo XLR-1/4" TRS mic/line input, 2 1/4" TRS balanced line outputs, and 1 1/4" TRS headphone output. This means the Focusrite Scarlett Solo offers a separate Hi-Z input for instruments, which the RODE AI-1 does not.
Neither of the interfaces includes digital audio I/O, and both connect to the host via USB-C. Regarding OS compatibility, both interfaces are compatible with macOS and Windows, with the RODE AI-1 supporting macOS 10.10 or later and Windows 7 or later, while the Focusrite Scarlett Solo supports macOS and Windows without specifying versions.
For power requirements, both interfaces are powered via USB bus power, with the Focusrite Scarlett Solo also allowing for an optional USB power adapter (not included). The RODE AI-1 relies solely on USB bus power.
In summary, while both interfaces offer robust features for a range of audio recording needs, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo stands out with its higher sampling rate and additional Hi-Z input, offering slightly more versatility for users.

General
Channels of I/O
1 Input / 2 Output	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 192 kHz
Built-In DSP

Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	192 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
1	1
Built-In Microphone

Input Level Adjustment
2x Knob	2x Knob
Expansion Slots

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface are both high-quality audio interfaces, but they offer different features that cater to varying user needs.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo provides 2 channels of analog I/O at a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz with 24-bit resolution. It features 1 microphone input and does not include built-in DSP or a built-in microphone. The device allows for input level adjustment through 2 knobs and does not offer expansion slots for additional connectivity or functionality.
On the other hand, the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface offers 1 analog input and 2 outputs at a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz with 24-bit resolution. Similar to the Scarlett Solo, it includes 1 microphone input, lacks built-in DSP, and does not feature a built-in microphone. Input level adjustment is also managed through 2 knobs, and there are no expansion slots available for further expansion.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo stands out with its higher maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz, providing more detailed audio capture, and offers an additional input channel compared to the RODE AI-1. Both devices share similar features in terms of input level adjustment and the absence of built-in DSP or microphones, making them suitable for users seeking straightforward and effective audio interfaces without additional processing capabilities.

Signal Processing
Gain/Trim Range
Inputs: 0 to 45 dB	Mic/Line Inputs: Up to +69 dB Hi-Z Inputs: 62 dB

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface both serve as high-quality solutions for audio recording and production, but they exhibit distinct differences in their specifications, particularly in the gain/trim range and additional features.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation) offers a more extensive gain/trim range, providing up to +69 dB for mic/line inputs and 62 dB for Hi-Z inputs. This wide range of gain/trim makes the Scarlett Solo versatile for a variety of microphones and instruments, accommodating both low-sensitivity mics and high-output instruments effectively. This can be particularly beneficial for users who need flexibility in handling different audio sources without requiring additional preamps.
On the other hand, the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface presents a more limited gain/trim range, with inputs ranging from 0 to 45 dB. While this may suffice for many standard recording situations, it may not offer the same level of adaptability for lower-output microphones or high-gain instruments as the Scarlett Solo. This narrower gain range could necessitate additional equipment to achieve optimal levels for certain recording scenarios.
Additionally, the RODE AI-1 lacks features such as a high-pass filter and solo/mute options, which are often useful for refining the audio signal and managing monitoring setups during recording and production. The absence of these features means that users may need to rely on external software or hardware to perform these functions, potentially complicating the recording process.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Generation) stands out with its broader gain/trim range and flexibility, making it a more versatile choice for a variety of recording needs. The RODE AI-1, while a solid interface, offers a more limited gain range and lacks additional features like high-pass filtering and solo/mute options, which could be important for some users.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Mic/Line Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output	1x XLR 3-Pin Balanced Mic Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Phantom Power
48 V	48 V, Selectable On/Off
Digital Audio I/O

Host Connection
USB-C	1x USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
Not Specified by Manufacturer	USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)

Sync I/O

Network I/O

MIDI I/O

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface both offer robust solutions for connecting audio equipment to a computer, yet they differ in several key aspects.
In terms of analog audio I/O, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo provides a 1x XLR 3-pin balanced mic input and a 1x 1/4" TS unbalanced line/Hi-Z input on the front panel. It also includes 2x 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs and a 1x 1/4" TRS headphone output on the front panel. This setup is designed to cater to both vocal recording through the XLR input and instrument recording through the Hi-Z input, offering flexibility for different recording scenarios.
On the other hand, the RODE AI-1 offers a slightly different configuration. It includes a 1x combo XLR-1/4" TRS mic/line input, which supports both microphone and line-level signals in a single input. Additionally, it has 2x 1/4" TRS balanced line outputs and a 1x 1/4" TRS headphone output. The combo input on the RODE AI-1 simplifies connectivity by allowing users to plug in either an XLR or a 1/4" TRS connector into the same port.
Both interfaces provide 48V phantom power, which is essential for using condenser microphones. This feature is selectable on the Focusrite Scarlett Solo, allowing users to turn it on or off as needed.
Regarding the host connection, both devices use USB-C, ensuring fast and reliable data transfer to the host computer. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo specifies its host connection protocol as USB 2.0, while the RODE AI-1 does not specify the protocol, which may suggest a focus on ease of use rather than technical specifics.
Neither of the interfaces includes digital audio I/O, USB (non-host), Sync I/O, Network I/O, MIDI I/O, or wireless capabilities. This indicates that both interfaces are streamlined for straightforward audio recording and playback without additional digital connectivity or synchronization features.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo and the RODE AI-1 both offer essential features for high-quality audio recording through USB-C connectivity. The Scarlett Solo stands out with its dedicated mic and instrument inputs, while the RODE AI-1 offers a versatile combo input. Both provide balanced monitor outputs and headphone outputs, ensuring they can handle professional monitoring needs.

Performance
Frequency Response
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±1 dB	XLR Mic Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB 1/4" Line Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.05 dB 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 20 Hz to 20 kHz 0.15 dB
Maximum Output Level
Monitor Outputs: -6 dBu	1/4" Line: +16 dBu
Headphone Output Power
24 mW into 32 Ohms 245 mW into 300 Ohms	1/4": 32 mW into 33 Ohms 22 mW into 300 Ohms
Impedance
Hi-Z Inputs: 0.9 Megohm Mic Inputs: 1.3 Kilohms	XLR Mic Inputs: 3 Kilohms 1/4" Line Inputs: 60 Kilohms 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohms 1/4" Line Outputs: 200 Ohms 1/4" Headphone Outputs: < 50 Ohm
Dynamic Range
104 dBu	XLR Mic Inputs: 113 dBA 1/4" Line Inputs: 113 dBA 1/4" Hi-Z Inputs: 112 dBA 1/4" Line Outputs: 120 dB 1/4" Headphone: 112 dB (at 33 Ohms) 115 dB (at 300 Ohms) Digital A/D Converters: 120 dB Digital D/A Converters: 130 dBA
EIN
-128 dBA	XLR Mic Inputs: -127 dBu A-Weighted

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface both serve as essential tools for audio recording, but they have distinct differences in their specifications and performance characteristics.
In terms of frequency response, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo offers a slightly tighter range with its XLR mic inputs (20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.06 dB), 1/4" line inputs (20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.05 dB), and 1/4" Hi-Z inputs (20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.15 dB) compared to the RODE AI-1, which has a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±1 dB. This indicates that the Scarlett Solo might provide a more precise and accurate reproduction of sound across the audible spectrum.
When looking at maximum input and output levels, the Scarlett Solo supports a maximum input level of 9.5 dBu for XLR mic, 22 dBu for 1/4" line, and 12 dBu for 1/4" Hi-Z inputs. Its maximum output level for the 1/4" line is +16 dBu. In contrast, the RODE AI-1 has a maximum output level for monitor outputs of -6 dBu. This suggests that the Scarlett Solo can handle and output higher signal levels, which can be beneficial for various professional audio applications.
The headphone output power also differs significantly between the two. The Scarlett Solo provides 32 mW into 33 Ohms and 22 mW into 300 Ohms, while the RODE AI-1 offers 24 mW into 32 Ohms and a notably higher 245 mW into 300 Ohms. This makes the RODE AI-1 potentially more powerful for driving high-impedance headphones, which could be a critical factor for users requiring strong headphone output.
Regarding impedance, the Scarlett Solo has XLR mic inputs with 3 Kilohms, 1/4" line inputs with 60 Kilohms, 1/4" Hi-Z inputs with 1 Megohm, and 1/4" line outputs with 200 Ohms. The RODE AI-1, on the other hand, offers Hi-Z inputs with 0.9 Megohm and mic inputs with 1.3 Kilohms. This indicates that both interfaces are capable of handling various input sources, but the Scarlett Solo provides higher impedance options, which may affect compatibility with different microphones and instruments.
In terms of dynamic range, the Scarlett Solo excels with values such as 113 dBA for XLR mic inputs, 113 dBA for 1/4" line inputs, 112 dBA for 1/4" Hi-Z inputs, 120 dB for 1/4" line outputs, and up to 115 dB for headphone outputs at 300 Ohms. The RODE AI-1, however, has a dynamic range of 104 dBu, which is lower in comparison. This means the Scarlett Solo can capture and output a wider range of sound levels, from the quietest to the loudest, with greater detail.
Lastly, the EIN (Equivalent Input Noise) for both interfaces is quite close, with the Scarlett Solo at -127 dBu A-Weighted and the RODE AI-1 at -128 dBA. This means both interfaces offer low noise levels, ensuring clean audio recordings.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) generally offers superior technical specifications in terms of frequency response, maximum input and output levels, dynamic range, and a broader range of impedance options. The RODE AI-1, however, excels in headphone output power, making it more suitable for users requiring high headphone amplification.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 kHz	44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 / 176.4 / 192 kHz
Bit Depths
24-Bit	24-Bit

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface both serve as high-quality, portable audio interfaces, but they differ in several key specifications.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) supports a wider range of sample rates, including 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, 176.4, and 192 kHz. This broad range makes it versatile for various audio production needs, from basic recordings to high-resolution audio projects. It maintains a 24-bit depth, which is standard for professional-grade audio interfaces, ensuring high-quality sound reproduction. The Scarlett Solo relies on internal sync sources for its clocking.
In contrast, the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface supports sample rates of 44.1, 48, 88.2, and 96 kHz, which, while sufficient for most recording applications, does not reach the higher sample rates available on the Scarlett Solo. Like the Scarlett Solo, it also operates at a 24-bit depth, providing professional audio quality. The RODE AI-1 includes zero-latency direct monitoring, a feature that allows real-time audio monitoring without any noticeable delay, which can be crucial for live recording situations. It also uses internal clocking for synchronization.
In summary, while both interfaces offer high-quality audio with 24-bit depth, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo provides a broader range of sample rates, making it more versatile for high-resolution audio work. The RODE AI-1, however, offers zero-latency direct monitoring, which is beneficial for real-time recording scenarios. Both interfaces are well-suited for different needs, with the Scarlett Solo being ideal for varied and high-resolution projects, and the RODE AI-1 excelling in live monitoring and straightforward recording setups.

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.10 or Later Windows 7 or Later	macOS Windows

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface both offer impressive features tailored to different user needs. One of the key differences lies in their OS compatibility. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo is compatible with both macOS and Windows operating systems, ensuring broad flexibility for users across different platforms. Additionally, it offers mobile app compatibility specifically for iPadOS, enhancing its utility for users who prefer or require mobile recording setups.
In contrast, the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface also supports both macOS and Windows operating systems but with slightly different version requirements. It is compatible with macOS 10.10 or later and Windows 7 or later, which covers a range of older and newer systems. However, the RODE AI-1 does not advertise compatibility with any mobile operating systems, which might limit its use for users looking to integrate their audio interface with mobile devices like iPads.
Both interfaces provide robust solutions for home studios and portable recording setups, but the Focusrite Scarlett Solo’s additional mobile app compatibility for iPadOS could be a significant advantage for users who require or prefer mobile recording capabilities.

Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power, USB Power Adapter (Not Included)

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface both offer USB bus power as a primary method for powering the devices. However, the Scarlett Solo provides additional flexibility with the option to use a USB power adapter, though it is not included with the unit. This allows users to potentially operate the interface in scenarios where USB bus power might not be sufficient or convenient.
In terms of power consumption, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo consumes 4.5 watts. This specification is not explicitly stated for the RODE AI-1, making it difficult to directly compare the two in this regard. The lack of detailed power consumption information for the RODE AI-1 may imply that it is optimized to run efficiently solely on USB bus power without the need for additional power adapters.
Overall, both interfaces are designed to be portable and easy to use with USB-C connectivity, but the Focusrite Scarlett Solo offers a bit more flexibility in power options, which could be a deciding factor for users with specific power requirements.

Physical
Dimensions
4.9 x 3.9 x 1.5" / 124 x 100 x 38 mm	5.63 x 3.78 x 1.79" / 14.3 x 9.6 x 4.55 cm
Weight
19.8 oz / 561.3 g	0.8 lb / 363.0 g

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface are both compact and portable solutions for audio recording, but they differ in key physical specifications.
In terms of dimensions, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo measures 5.63 x 3.78 x 1.79 inches (14.3 x 9.6 x 4.55 cm), making it slightly larger than the RODE AI-1, which measures 4.9 x 3.9 x 1.5 inches (124 x 100 x 38 mm). Despite the difference in size, both interfaces are designed to be easily portable and suitable for a range of recording environments.
When it comes to weight, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo is significantly lighter at 0.8 lb (363.0 g) compared to the RODE AI-1, which weighs 19.8 oz (561.3 g). This makes the Scarlett Solo a more lightweight option, potentially offering greater convenience for users who need to transport their audio interface frequently.
Both interfaces utilize USB-C connectivity, ensuring modern and efficient data transfer. The choice between these two might come down to the importance of portability and weight versus the specific feature set and sound characteristics each brand offers.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
1.155 lb	1.305 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
7 x 5.1 x 2.55"	7.2 x 6.1 x 2.5"

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface (4th Generation) and the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface both serve the purpose of providing high-quality audio input and output for recording and streaming applications, but they differ slightly in terms of physical specifications.
Starting with the package weight, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo weighs 1.305 lb, making it slightly heavier than the RODE AI-1, which has a package weight of 1.155 lb. This difference in weight might be a consideration for users who prioritize portability, as the RODE AI-1 is marginally lighter.
In terms of box dimensions, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo measures 7.2 x 6.1 x 2.5 inches (LxWxH). On the other hand, the RODE AI-1 is slightly more compact with dimensions of 7 x 5.1 x 2.55 inches (LxWxH). This makes the RODE AI-1 not only lighter but also smaller in width and length, which could be advantageous for users with limited space or those who prefer a more compact setup.
Overall, both audio interfaces offer robust features for audio recording and streaming, but the Focusrite Scarlett Solo is slightly heavier and larger in box dimensions compared to the more compact and lighter RODE AI-1.