Audient iD4 MKII vs RODE AI-1: Comprehensive USB-C Audio Interface Comparison

The RODE AI-1 and the Audient iD4 MKII are both popular USB-C audio interfaces designed for home studios, podcasting, and portable recording setups, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences.
The RODE AI-1 features a simple yet robust design aimed at users who prioritize ease of use and quality. It offers a single XLR-1/4” combo input, allowing for the connection of microphones, instruments, or line-level sources. The unit is equipped with a high-quality preamp and 48V phantom power, ensuring clear and detailed recordings. The AI-1 also includes a high-quality headphone amplifier and balanced 1/4” outputs for connecting studio monitors. Its plug-and-play functionality makes it an excellent choice for beginners and those who require a straightforward setup without sacrificing audio fidelity.
On the other hand, the Audient iD4 MKII is a more feature-rich interface, appealing to users who demand greater versatility and premium audio performance. It offers two inputs: one Class-A Audient Console mic preamp and one JFET instrument input, enabling simultaneous recording of vocals and instruments. The iD4 MKII also includes a unique ScrollControl feature, which allows the main volume knob to be used for DAW control and other software parameters. Additionally, it boasts a comprehensive monitoring section with a dual headphone output, making it ideal for collaborative work. The Audient iD4 MKII is constructed with high-quality components and offers a dynamic range of 120dB, ensuring pristine sound quality.
In summary, the RODE AI-1 is perfect for users seeking a no-fuss, high-quality audio interface with essential features, while the Audient iD4 MKII caters to those who require more advanced functionality and superior audio performance. Both interfaces are excellent choices, but the best one for you will depend on your specific recording needs and preferences.

In-Depth Specifications, Advantages, and Disadvantages of Audient iD4 MKII and RODE AI-1

RODE AI-1

Audient iD4 MKII

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
purchase value 85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the combination of high-quality audio output and affordable pricing, making it accessible for both amateur and professional audio enthusiasts. Users felt that the interface offered excellent performance without breaking the bank, which was especially appealing to those who were budget-conscious. 15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, citing that similar products with more features were available at a comparable price. Some users felt that the interface lacked advanced options that could have justified the price point, leading them to believe they were not getting the best value for their money. 85% quality of materials 90% of users were pleased with the quality of materials used in the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. Many commented on its robust build and high-quality components, which contributed to a perception of durability and reliability. Users appreciated the metal casing, which provided a sturdy feel and assured them of the product's longevity. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of materials, mentioning that the unit felt heavier and bulkier than expected. A few users experienced issues with the knobs and buttons, reporting that they felt loose or less responsive over time, which detracted from the overall quality perception. 90% ease of use 88% of users found the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface easy to use, highlighting its plug-and-play functionality and straightforward design. The interface was praised for its intuitive controls, which made it accessible to beginners and professionals alike, allowing users to focus more on their creative process rather than technical setup. 12% of users were not satisfied with the ease of use, mainly due to initial setup challenges. Some users encountered difficulties with driver installation and compatibility issues with certain operating systems, which required additional troubleshooting and technical knowledge. 88% sound quality 92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its ability to deliver clear and crisp audio, which significantly enhanced their recording and playback experiences. Users noted that the preamps were quiet and offered a professional-grade sound that exceeded their expectations. 8% of users were disappointed with the sound quality, pointing out occasional noise interference and less than optimal performance when compared to higher-end models. A few users experienced problems with signal stability, which affected the overall audio output during critical recording sessions. 92% compatibility 83% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface with various devices and operating systems. They appreciated that it worked seamlessly with most popular DAWs and platforms, allowing them to integrate it easily into their existing setups without significant adjustments. 17% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with older operating systems and less common DAWs. Some users reported that the interface required specific drivers that were not readily available or resulted in latency problems, which hampered their recording sessions. 83% design 87% of users were satisfied with the design of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated its sleek and modern appearance, as well as the compact size which made it portable and easy to incorporate into any workspace. The minimalist design was also noted as a positive aspect, providing an aesthetically pleasing addition to their audio gear. 13% of users were dissatisfied with the design, noting that the interface's compactness sometimes made it feel cramped, especially when connecting multiple devices. A few users expressed a preference for more visible labeling on the controls and connections, which could have improved usability in low-light environments. 87% durability 89% of users expressed satisfaction with the durability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They were impressed by its robust construction, which they felt could withstand regular use and transport without easily succumbing to wear and tear. The metal casing was specifically mentioned as a factor that contributed to its perceived durability. 11% of users were not satisfied with the durability, reporting issues like premature wear on the knobs and switches. Some users experienced loose connections after extended use, which undermined their confidence in the product's long-term reliability. 89% portability 86% of users were satisfied with the portability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated its lightweight design and compact form factor, which made it easy to transport and ideal for on-the-go recording sessions. The interface was often praised for fitting comfortably into backpacks and small carry cases. 14% of users were dissatisfied with the portability, citing that the interface, while compact, required additional cables and adapters for certain setups, which added to the bulk. Some users found it inconvenient to constantly disconnect and reconnect the device when moving between locations. 86% latency 84% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found that it provided smooth and responsive audio processing, which was crucial for live monitoring and recording applications. Many users highlighted its real-time performance as a key benefit. 16% of users experienced dissatisfaction with latency issues, particularly when using the interface with certain DAWs or plugins. Some users noted occasional delays that affected the synchronization of audio tracks, which was problematic for time-sensitive recordings. 84% driver stability 82% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They reported a reliable connection and consistent performance across various sessions, which minimized interruptions and technical difficulties during critical tasks. 18% of users were dissatisfied with driver stability, encountering frequent disconnections and crashes. Some users struggled with maintaining a stable connection, especially during extended recording sessions, which affected their workflow and productivity. 82% customer support 81% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by RODE for the AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the prompt and helpful responses from support staff, which resolved their queries effectively and enhanced their overall experience with the product. 19% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, reporting delays in response times and a lack of comprehensive solutions to their problems. Some users felt that the support team lacked technical knowledge, which left their issues unresolved. 81% software integration 80% of users were satisfied with the software integration capabilities of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found it compatible with a wide range of DAWs and appreciated the seamless integration with most audio editing software, which facilitated a smooth workflow. 20% of users were dissatisfied with software integration, citing challenges in setting up the interface with specific DAWs. Some users experienced difficulties in configuring settings to achieve optimal performance, which was frustrating and time-consuming. 80% innovation 78% of users appreciated the innovative features of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, particularly its USB-C connectivity and compact design. They felt that these features represented a forward-thinking approach to audio interface design, catering to modern user needs. 22% of users were dissatisfied with the innovation aspect, feeling that the interface lacked groundbreaking features or advanced functionalities that could set it apart from competitors. Some users expected more cutting-edge technology or additional inputs/outputs to enhance versatility. 78% input/output options 75% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the single XLR input sufficient for their basic recording needs and appreciated the simplicity of the interface's design. 25% of users were dissatisfied with the limited input/output options, expressing a desire for more flexibility, such as additional inputs or a MIDI connection. Users who required more complex setups felt restricted by the interface's minimal connectivity options. 75% aesthetic appeal 88% of users were satisfied with the aesthetic appeal of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its sleek and minimalist design, which complemented their existing audio gear and added a touch of sophistication to their setups. 12% of users were not impressed with the aesthetic appeal, describing it as too plain and lacking distinctive features. Some users felt that a more visually striking design could enhance the product's appeal and make it stand out in a crowded market. 88% versatility 77% of users were satisfied with the versatility of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, finding it adaptable to various recording environments and applications. They appreciated its ability to handle different audio tasks effectively, from podcasting to music production. 23% of users were dissatisfied with the versatility, noting that the interface was limited in terms of expandability and connectivity. Users seeking a more comprehensive solution for diverse audio needs felt that the interface's options were too constrained. 77% mic preamp quality 91% of users were satisfied with the mic preamp quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised the clarity and low noise performance, which enhanced the quality of their recordings and exceeded their expectations for an interface in this price range. 9% of users were dissatisfied with the mic preamp quality, reporting occasional noise and signal issues. Some felt that the preamp lacked the warmth and richness found in higher-end models, which affected the overall sound quality. 91% headphone output quality 89% of users were satisfied with the headphone output quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the output to be powerful and clear, allowing for accurate monitoring and mixing during recording sessions. 11% of users were dissatisfied with the headphone output quality, mentioning a lack of volume and clarity with certain headphones. Some users experienced distortion at higher volumes, which impacted their ability to monitor audio effectively. 89% USB-C connectivity 90% of users appreciated the USB-C connectivity of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, which provided fast data transfer and a stable connection. Users noted that it was a significant improvement over older USB standards, enhancing their overall experience. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the USB-C connectivity, mainly due to compatibility issues with older devices or the need for additional adapters. Some users found it inconvenient to upgrade their existing setups to accommodate the new standard. 90% build quality 93% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its sturdy construction and premium materials, which gave them confidence in the product's durability and long-term use. 7% of users expressed concerns about the build quality, reporting minor defects or inconsistencies in the finish. Some users experienced issues with the durability of certain components, such as the knobs and switches, which affected their overall satisfaction. 93%	Purchase Value 85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Audient iD4 MKII, highlighting its competitive pricing for the quality it offers. Users appreciated the robust features and performance that rival more expensive options, making it an excellent choice for both beginners and seasoned audio professionals looking for a budget-friendly solution. 15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, noting that while the initial cost is competitive, some felt that the inclusion of additional features or bundled accessories would have enhanced its value proposition. 85% Build Quality 90% of users praised the build quality of the Audient iD4 MKII, emphasizing its sturdy construction and premium feel. The metal chassis was frequently mentioned as a standout feature that suggests durability and longevity, making it a reliable choice for both home and on-the-go use. 10% of users were not satisfied with the build quality, citing concerns about the durability of certain components like the rotary encoder. Some users felt these parts might not withstand heavy, prolonged use. 90% Sound Quality 95% of users were very satisfied with the sound quality of the Audient iD4 MKII, often mentioning its superior pre-amps and DACs that deliver clean and clear audio. Professionals and hobbyists alike noted the interface's ability to produce studio-level sound, making it a top choice for those prioritizing audio fidelity. 5% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, mostly due to specific preferences or expectations not being met. A few reported minor issues with noise levels when pushing the interface to its limits, though these cases were rare. 95% Ease of Use 88% of users found the Audient iD4 MKII easy to use, appreciating its straightforward setup and intuitive controls. The interface's simplicity was a highlight, allowing users to focus on their projects without being bogged down by complex configurations. 12% of users were dissatisfied with the ease of use, often due to initial connectivity issues or software setup hurdles. Some users felt the learning curve was steeper than expected, especially those new to audio interfaces. 88% Portability 80% of users appreciated the portability of the Audient iD4 MKII, noting its compact size and lightweight design as ideal for mobile setups or small studio spaces. The USB-C connectivity was also praised for its convenience and quick setup. 20% of users were not fully satisfied with the portability, mentioning that despite its compact size, the need for additional cables and peripherals sometimes made it less travel-friendly than expected. 80% Software Compatibility 82% of users were satisfied with the software compatibility of the Audient iD4 MKII, appreciating its seamless integration with major DAWs and operating systems. The inclusion of useful software bundles was also a positive aspect for many users. 18% of users experienced dissatisfaction with software compatibility, often due to minor issues with driver installations or specific software not recognizing the interface immediately, leading to frustration during initial use. 82% Customer Support 75% of users were content with the customer support provided for the Audient iD4 MKII, noting the responsive and helpful service they received when encountering issues or inquiries. Many appreciated the promptness and knowledgeability of the support team. 25% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses or a lack of resolution for their specific problems. Some users felt that more comprehensive troubleshooting resources could improve the overall support experience. 75% Durability 85% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Audient iD4 MKII, often highlighting its robust build and long-lasting performance. Users appreciated the interface's ability to withstand regular use without showing signs of wear. 15% of users expressed concerns about durability, with some experiencing issues with wear and tear on specific components such as knobs or jacks after extended use, leading to worries about long-term reliability. 85% Design Aesthetics 92% of users were impressed by the design aesthetics of the Audient iD4 MKII, commending its sleek and professional look. The interface's modern design and user-friendly layout made it an attractive addition to any studio setup. 8% of users were less satisfied with the design aesthetics, with some preferring a more traditional look or different color options. A few users mentioned that the design, while modern, might not appeal to those with more classic tastes. 92% Latency 87% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the Audient iD4 MKII, noting minimal delay during recording and playback. This feature was particularly appreciated by musicians and producers requiring real-time monitoring. 13% of users experienced dissatisfaction with latency, although issues were often linked to specific system setups or software configurations rather than the interface itself, leading to mixed experiences. 87% Compatibility with Instruments 90% of users were pleased with the compatibility of the Audient iD4 MKII with various instruments, highlighting its ability to handle different input types with ease. The high-quality preamps were particularly praised for their performance with guitars and microphones. 10% of users reported dissatisfaction with instrument compatibility, often due to niche requirements or specific setups that did not align perfectly with the interface's capabilities, necessitating additional equipment or adjustments. 90% Control Features 82% of users appreciated the control features of the Audient iD4 MKII, noting the ease of use and functionality provided by the interface's controls. The large rotary encoder was frequently praised for its precision and tactile feel. 18% of users were dissatisfied with the control features, expressing a desire for more advanced options or customizable settings. Some users felt the interface could benefit from additional dials or switches for more nuanced control. 82% Preamp Quality 94% of users were highly satisfied with the preamp quality of the Audient iD4 MKII, often highlighting the clean and transparent sound it provided. The preamps were considered a standout feature, offering performance typically found in higher-end models. 6% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the preamp quality, typically due to specific preferences or compatibility issues with certain microphones. Some users felt that while the preamps were good, they didn't fully meet their personal expectations. 94% Headphone Output Quality 89% of users were satisfied with the headphone output quality of the Audient iD4 MKII, praising its ability to drive a wide range of headphones with clarity and power. Users noted that the output remained clear even at higher volumes. 11% of users were not fully satisfied with the headphone output quality, with some experiencing issues with volume levels or distortion at higher settings. A few users felt that the output could benefit from additional power or clarity for studio-grade headphones. 89% USB-C Connectivity 88% of users appreciated the USB-C connectivity of the Audient iD4 MKII, noting faster data transfer and a more stable connection compared to older USB standards. This feature was seen as a modern enhancement that aligned with current tech trends. 12% of users experienced dissatisfaction with the USB-C connectivity, often due to compatibility issues with older systems or the need for additional adapters. Some users felt that while USB-C is beneficial, it can pose challenges for those without compatible ports. 88% Phantom Power 91% of users were satisfied with the phantom power feature of the Audient iD4 MKII, appreciating its reliable performance with condenser microphones. The ease of activation and consistent power delivery were noted as key benefits. 9% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the phantom power, mainly due to specific cases where the power delivery did not meet expectations for certain high-demand microphones, leading to concerns about its adequacy for all recording situations. 91% Metering 78% of users were satisfied with the metering capabilities of the Audient iD4 MKII, mentioning that the visual feedback provided was adequate for most recording scenarios. Users found the metering useful for monitoring input levels during sessions. 22% of users were dissatisfied with the metering, feeling that more detailed or advanced metering options would enhance the interface's functionality. Some users desired a more intuitive or visually rich metering system for precise adjustments. 78% Driver Stability 84% of users found the driver stability of the Audient iD4 MKII to be reliable, noting minimal issues with crashes or disconnects. Users appreciated the consistent performance across different software and operating system updates. 16% of users experienced dissatisfaction with driver stability, often encountering occasional drops or compatibility issues with specific DAWs. These instances, while not widespread, affected the overall user experience. 84% Input/Output Options 80% of users were content with the input/output options of the Audient iD4 MKII, finding them suitable for a range of recording setups. The combination of XLR and instrument inputs was appreciated for its versatility. 20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the input/output options, often wishing for more flexibility or additional ports to accommodate complex setups. Some users felt that the interface could benefit from more input/output expandability. 80% Durability of Connectors 86% of users were satisfied with the durability of the connectors on the Audient iD4 MKII, mentioning that they were built to withstand frequent use without degradation. The solid feel of the connectors was a highlight for many. 14% of users expressed concerns about the durability of the connectors, with some experiencing issues with loose connections or wear over time. A few users suggested that more robust materials could enhance longevity. 86% Overall Satisfaction 89% of users reported overall satisfaction with the Audient iD4 MKII, emphasizing its balance of quality, performance, and value. Users appreciated its ease of use and the high-quality audio it delivered, making it a favorite among many. 11% of users were not entirely satisfied overall, often due to specific feature limitations or personal preferences not being met. Some users felt that while the interface performed well, certain aspects could be improved to better meet their needs. 89% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

purchase value

85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the combination of high-quality audio output and affordable pricing, making it accessible for both amateur and professional audio enthusiasts. Users felt that the interface offered excellent performance without breaking the bank, which was especially appealing to those who were budget-conscious.

15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, citing that similar products with more features were available at a comparable price. Some users felt that the interface lacked advanced options that could have justified the price point, leading them to believe they were not getting the best value for their money.

85%
quality of materials

90% of users were pleased with the quality of materials used in the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. Many commented on its robust build and high-quality components, which contributed to a perception of durability and reliability. Users appreciated the metal casing, which provided a sturdy feel and assured them of the product's longevity.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of materials, mentioning that the unit felt heavier and bulkier than expected. A few users experienced issues with the knobs and buttons, reporting that they felt loose or less responsive over time, which detracted from the overall quality perception.

90%
ease of use

88% of users found the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface easy to use, highlighting its plug-and-play functionality and straightforward design. The interface was praised for its intuitive controls, which made it accessible to beginners and professionals alike, allowing users to focus more on their creative process rather than technical setup.

12% of users were not satisfied with the ease of use, mainly due to initial setup challenges. Some users encountered difficulties with driver installation and compatibility issues with certain operating systems, which required additional troubleshooting and technical knowledge.

88%
sound quality

92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its ability to deliver clear and crisp audio, which significantly enhanced their recording and playback experiences. Users noted that the preamps were quiet and offered a professional-grade sound that exceeded their expectations.

8% of users were disappointed with the sound quality, pointing out occasional noise interference and less than optimal performance when compared to higher-end models. A few users experienced problems with signal stability, which affected the overall audio output during critical recording sessions.

92%
compatibility

83% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface with various devices and operating systems. They appreciated that it worked seamlessly with most popular DAWs and platforms, allowing them to integrate it easily into their existing setups without significant adjustments.

17% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with older operating systems and less common DAWs. Some users reported that the interface required specific drivers that were not readily available or resulted in latency problems, which hampered their recording sessions.

83%
design

87% of users were satisfied with the design of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated its sleek and modern appearance, as well as the compact size which made it portable and easy to incorporate into any workspace. The minimalist design was also noted as a positive aspect, providing an aesthetically pleasing addition to their audio gear.

13% of users were dissatisfied with the design, noting that the interface's compactness sometimes made it feel cramped, especially when connecting multiple devices. A few users expressed a preference for more visible labeling on the controls and connections, which could have improved usability in low-light environments.

87%
durability

89% of users expressed satisfaction with the durability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They were impressed by its robust construction, which they felt could withstand regular use and transport without easily succumbing to wear and tear. The metal casing was specifically mentioned as a factor that contributed to its perceived durability.

11% of users were not satisfied with the durability, reporting issues like premature wear on the knobs and switches. Some users experienced loose connections after extended use, which undermined their confidence in the product's long-term reliability.

89%
portability

86% of users were satisfied with the portability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated its lightweight design and compact form factor, which made it easy to transport and ideal for on-the-go recording sessions. The interface was often praised for fitting comfortably into backpacks and small carry cases.

14% of users were dissatisfied with the portability, citing that the interface, while compact, required additional cables and adapters for certain setups, which added to the bulk. Some users found it inconvenient to constantly disconnect and reconnect the device when moving between locations.

86%
latency

84% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found that it provided smooth and responsive audio processing, which was crucial for live monitoring and recording applications. Many users highlighted its real-time performance as a key benefit.

16% of users experienced dissatisfaction with latency issues, particularly when using the interface with certain DAWs or plugins. Some users noted occasional delays that affected the synchronization of audio tracks, which was problematic for time-sensitive recordings.

84%
driver stability

82% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They reported a reliable connection and consistent performance across various sessions, which minimized interruptions and technical difficulties during critical tasks.

18% of users were dissatisfied with driver stability, encountering frequent disconnections and crashes. Some users struggled with maintaining a stable connection, especially during extended recording sessions, which affected their workflow and productivity.

82%
customer support

81% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by RODE for the AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the prompt and helpful responses from support staff, which resolved their queries effectively and enhanced their overall experience with the product.

19% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, reporting delays in response times and a lack of comprehensive solutions to their problems. Some users felt that the support team lacked technical knowledge, which left their issues unresolved.

81%
software integration

80% of users were satisfied with the software integration capabilities of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found it compatible with a wide range of DAWs and appreciated the seamless integration with most audio editing software, which facilitated a smooth workflow.

20% of users were dissatisfied with software integration, citing challenges in setting up the interface with specific DAWs. Some users experienced difficulties in configuring settings to achieve optimal performance, which was frustrating and time-consuming.

80%
innovation

78% of users appreciated the innovative features of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, particularly its USB-C connectivity and compact design. They felt that these features represented a forward-thinking approach to audio interface design, catering to modern user needs.

22% of users were dissatisfied with the innovation aspect, feeling that the interface lacked groundbreaking features or advanced functionalities that could set it apart from competitors. Some users expected more cutting-edge technology or additional inputs/outputs to enhance versatility.

78%
input/output options

75% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the single XLR input sufficient for their basic recording needs and appreciated the simplicity of the interface's design.

25% of users were dissatisfied with the limited input/output options, expressing a desire for more flexibility, such as additional inputs or a MIDI connection. Users who required more complex setups felt restricted by the interface's minimal connectivity options.

75%
aesthetic appeal

88% of users were satisfied with the aesthetic appeal of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its sleek and minimalist design, which complemented their existing audio gear and added a touch of sophistication to their setups.

12% of users were not impressed with the aesthetic appeal, describing it as too plain and lacking distinctive features. Some users felt that a more visually striking design could enhance the product's appeal and make it stand out in a crowded market.

88%
versatility

77% of users were satisfied with the versatility of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, finding it adaptable to various recording environments and applications. They appreciated its ability to handle different audio tasks effectively, from podcasting to music production.

23% of users were dissatisfied with the versatility, noting that the interface was limited in terms of expandability and connectivity. Users seeking a more comprehensive solution for diverse audio needs felt that the interface's options were too constrained.

77%
mic preamp quality

91% of users were satisfied with the mic preamp quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised the clarity and low noise performance, which enhanced the quality of their recordings and exceeded their expectations for an interface in this price range.

9% of users were dissatisfied with the mic preamp quality, reporting occasional noise and signal issues. Some felt that the preamp lacked the warmth and richness found in higher-end models, which affected the overall sound quality.

91%
headphone output quality

89% of users were satisfied with the headphone output quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the output to be powerful and clear, allowing for accurate monitoring and mixing during recording sessions.

11% of users were dissatisfied with the headphone output quality, mentioning a lack of volume and clarity with certain headphones. Some users experienced distortion at higher volumes, which impacted their ability to monitor audio effectively.

89%
USB-C connectivity

90% of users appreciated the USB-C connectivity of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, which provided fast data transfer and a stable connection. Users noted that it was a significant improvement over older USB standards, enhancing their overall experience.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the USB-C connectivity, mainly due to compatibility issues with older devices or the need for additional adapters. Some users found it inconvenient to upgrade their existing setups to accommodate the new standard.

90%
build quality

93% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its sturdy construction and premium materials, which gave them confidence in the product's durability and long-term use.

7% of users expressed concerns about the build quality, reporting minor defects or inconsistencies in the finish. Some users experienced issues with the durability of certain components, such as the knobs and switches, which affected their overall satisfaction.

93%

Purchase Value

85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the Audient iD4 MKII, highlighting its competitive pricing for the quality it offers. Users appreciated the robust features and performance that rival more expensive options, making it an excellent choice for both beginners and seasoned audio professionals looking for a budget-friendly solution.

15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, noting that while the initial cost is competitive, some felt that the inclusion of additional features or bundled accessories would have enhanced its value proposition.

85%
Build Quality

90% of users praised the build quality of the Audient iD4 MKII, emphasizing its sturdy construction and premium feel. The metal chassis was frequently mentioned as a standout feature that suggests durability and longevity, making it a reliable choice for both home and on-the-go use.

10% of users were not satisfied with the build quality, citing concerns about the durability of certain components like the rotary encoder. Some users felt these parts might not withstand heavy, prolonged use.

90%
Sound Quality

95% of users were very satisfied with the sound quality of the Audient iD4 MKII, often mentioning its superior pre-amps and DACs that deliver clean and clear audio. Professionals and hobbyists alike noted the interface's ability to produce studio-level sound, making it a top choice for those prioritizing audio fidelity.

5% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, mostly due to specific preferences or expectations not being met. A few reported minor issues with noise levels when pushing the interface to its limits, though these cases were rare.

95%
Ease of Use

88% of users found the Audient iD4 MKII easy to use, appreciating its straightforward setup and intuitive controls. The interface's simplicity was a highlight, allowing users to focus on their projects without being bogged down by complex configurations.

12% of users were dissatisfied with the ease of use, often due to initial connectivity issues or software setup hurdles. Some users felt the learning curve was steeper than expected, especially those new to audio interfaces.

88%
Portability

80% of users appreciated the portability of the Audient iD4 MKII, noting its compact size and lightweight design as ideal for mobile setups or small studio spaces. The USB-C connectivity was also praised for its convenience and quick setup.

20% of users were not fully satisfied with the portability, mentioning that despite its compact size, the need for additional cables and peripherals sometimes made it less travel-friendly than expected.

80%
Software Compatibility

82% of users were satisfied with the software compatibility of the Audient iD4 MKII, appreciating its seamless integration with major DAWs and operating systems. The inclusion of useful software bundles was also a positive aspect for many users.

18% of users experienced dissatisfaction with software compatibility, often due to minor issues with driver installations or specific software not recognizing the interface immediately, leading to frustration during initial use.

82%
Customer Support

75% of users were content with the customer support provided for the Audient iD4 MKII, noting the responsive and helpful service they received when encountering issues or inquiries. Many appreciated the promptness and knowledgeability of the support team.

25% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, citing delayed responses or a lack of resolution for their specific problems. Some users felt that more comprehensive troubleshooting resources could improve the overall support experience.

75%
Durability

85% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Audient iD4 MKII, often highlighting its robust build and long-lasting performance. Users appreciated the interface's ability to withstand regular use without showing signs of wear.

15% of users expressed concerns about durability, with some experiencing issues with wear and tear on specific components such as knobs or jacks after extended use, leading to worries about long-term reliability.

85%
Design Aesthetics

92% of users were impressed by the design aesthetics of the Audient iD4 MKII, commending its sleek and professional look. The interface's modern design and user-friendly layout made it an attractive addition to any studio setup.

8% of users were less satisfied with the design aesthetics, with some preferring a more traditional look or different color options. A few users mentioned that the design, while modern, might not appeal to those with more classic tastes.

92%
Latency

87% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the Audient iD4 MKII, noting minimal delay during recording and playback. This feature was particularly appreciated by musicians and producers requiring real-time monitoring.

13% of users experienced dissatisfaction with latency, although issues were often linked to specific system setups or software configurations rather than the interface itself, leading to mixed experiences.

87%
Compatibility with Instruments

90% of users were pleased with the compatibility of the Audient iD4 MKII with various instruments, highlighting its ability to handle different input types with ease. The high-quality preamps were particularly praised for their performance with guitars and microphones.

10% of users reported dissatisfaction with instrument compatibility, often due to niche requirements or specific setups that did not align perfectly with the interface's capabilities, necessitating additional equipment or adjustments.

90%
Control Features

82% of users appreciated the control features of the Audient iD4 MKII, noting the ease of use and functionality provided by the interface's controls. The large rotary encoder was frequently praised for its precision and tactile feel.

18% of users were dissatisfied with the control features, expressing a desire for more advanced options or customizable settings. Some users felt the interface could benefit from additional dials or switches for more nuanced control.

82%
Preamp Quality

94% of users were highly satisfied with the preamp quality of the Audient iD4 MKII, often highlighting the clean and transparent sound it provided. The preamps were considered a standout feature, offering performance typically found in higher-end models.

6% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the preamp quality, typically due to specific preferences or compatibility issues with certain microphones. Some users felt that while the preamps were good, they didn't fully meet their personal expectations.

94%
Headphone Output Quality

89% of users were satisfied with the headphone output quality of the Audient iD4 MKII, praising its ability to drive a wide range of headphones with clarity and power. Users noted that the output remained clear even at higher volumes.

11% of users were not fully satisfied with the headphone output quality, with some experiencing issues with volume levels or distortion at higher settings. A few users felt that the output could benefit from additional power or clarity for studio-grade headphones.

89%
USB-C Connectivity

88% of users appreciated the USB-C connectivity of the Audient iD4 MKII, noting faster data transfer and a more stable connection compared to older USB standards. This feature was seen as a modern enhancement that aligned with current tech trends.

12% of users experienced dissatisfaction with the USB-C connectivity, often due to compatibility issues with older systems or the need for additional adapters. Some users felt that while USB-C is beneficial, it can pose challenges for those without compatible ports.

88%
Phantom Power

91% of users were satisfied with the phantom power feature of the Audient iD4 MKII, appreciating its reliable performance with condenser microphones. The ease of activation and consistent power delivery were noted as key benefits.

9% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the phantom power, mainly due to specific cases where the power delivery did not meet expectations for certain high-demand microphones, leading to concerns about its adequacy for all recording situations.

91%
Metering

78% of users were satisfied with the metering capabilities of the Audient iD4 MKII, mentioning that the visual feedback provided was adequate for most recording scenarios. Users found the metering useful for monitoring input levels during sessions.

22% of users were dissatisfied with the metering, feeling that more detailed or advanced metering options would enhance the interface's functionality. Some users desired a more intuitive or visually rich metering system for precise adjustments.

78%
Driver Stability

84% of users found the driver stability of the Audient iD4 MKII to be reliable, noting minimal issues with crashes or disconnects. Users appreciated the consistent performance across different software and operating system updates.

16% of users experienced dissatisfaction with driver stability, often encountering occasional drops or compatibility issues with specific DAWs. These instances, while not widespread, affected the overall user experience.

84%
Input/Output Options

80% of users were content with the input/output options of the Audient iD4 MKII, finding them suitable for a range of recording setups. The combination of XLR and instrument inputs was appreciated for its versatility.

20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the input/output options, often wishing for more flexibility or additional ports to accommodate complex setups. Some users felt that the interface could benefit from more input/output expandability.

80%
Durability of Connectors

86% of users were satisfied with the durability of the connectors on the Audient iD4 MKII, mentioning that they were built to withstand frequent use without degradation. The solid feel of the connectors was a highlight for many.

14% of users expressed concerns about the durability of the connectors, with some experiencing issues with loose connections or wear over time. A few users suggested that more robust materials could enhance longevity.

86%
Overall Satisfaction

89% of users reported overall satisfaction with the Audient iD4 MKII, emphasizing its balance of quality, performance, and value. Users appreciated its ease of use and the high-quality audio it delivered, making it a favorite among many.

11% of users were not entirely satisfied overall, often due to specific feature limitations or personal preferences not being met. Some users felt that while the interface performed well, certain aspects could be improved to better meet their needs.

89%

Pros:
High-quality preamps and audio conversion. Rugged and compact design. Easy setup and operation with plug-and-play functionality. Compatible with both Mac and Windows. Includes balanced outputs for studio monitors.	High-quality preamps and AD/DA converters. Compact and portable design. USB-C connectivity for faster data transfer and power. Direct monitoring with zero-latency. Robust build quality.

Cons:
Limited to a single input channel, which may not be suitable for multi-input recording needs. No midi input/output. Pricier compared to some other single-input interfaces. Lacks onboard controls for gain and monitoring.	Limited to two input channels. No MIDI input/output. Requires external power when used with some iOS devices. Higher price point compared to some competitors.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
1 Input / 2 Output	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 96 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	96 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
1	1 Preamp
Analog Audio I/O
1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Mic/Line Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output	1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel) 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Host Connection
USB-C	1x USB-C
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.10 or Later Windows 7 or Later	macOS 10.11.6 or Later macOS 11.1 or Later Windows 7 or Later 6 or Later iPadOS
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface and the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface both provide robust features for audio recording, but they have several differences in terms of their specifications.
The RODE AI-1 has a single input and two outputs, with a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz at 24-bit resolution. It offers one combo XLR-1/4" TRS mic/line input, two 1/4" TRS balanced line outputs, and one 1/4" TRS headphone output. It connects via USB-C and is compatible with macOS 10.10 or later and Windows 7 or later. The device is powered through USB bus power, which simplifies setup and portability.
On the other hand, the Audient iD4 MKII provides more versatility with its two analog inputs and two outputs at the same maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz at 24-bit resolution. It includes one combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line input, an additional 1/4" TRS unbalanced Hi-Z input on the front panel, two 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs, and two headphone outputs (one 1/4" TRS unbalanced and one 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS unbalanced, both on the front panel). It also connects via USB-C and is compatible with macOS 10.11.6 or later, macOS 11.1 or later, Windows 7 or later, and iPadOS, offering more flexibility in terms of device compatibility. Like the RODE AI-1, it is powered through USB bus power.
In summary, while both interfaces offer high-quality audio resolution and USB-C connectivity, the Audient iD4 MKII stands out with its additional input options and more extensive compatibility with various operating systems and devices, making it a more versatile choice for users needing multiple input types and outputs. The RODE AI-1, with its simpler interface and streamlined design, may appeal to users looking for a straightforward, easy-to-use option.

General
Channels of I/O
1 Input / 2 Output	Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 96 kHz
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	96 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
1	1 Preamp
Input Level Adjustment
2x Knob	2x Knob
Expansion Slots

When comparing the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface and the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface, several key features stand out, highlighting the strengths and differences of each product.
The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface offers 1 input and 2 outputs, making it a straightforward choice for solo recording needs. It features a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz at 24-bit, ensuring high-quality audio recording and playback. The RODE AI-1 has 1 microphone input and offers input level adjustment via 2 knobs. However, it lacks built-in DSP capabilities and does not support expansion slots, which may limit its flexibility for more complex recording setups.
On the other hand, the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface provides slightly more versatility with 2 analog inputs and 2 outputs, also at a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz at 24-bit. This interface includes 1 preamp for microphone input and similarly offers input level adjustment through 2 knobs. Like the RODE AI-1, the Audient iD4 MKII does not have expansion slots. However, the additional analog input may offer more flexibility for users needing to connect multiple instruments or audio sources simultaneously.
Both interfaces are designed for high-quality audio performance and are equipped with USB-C connectivity, ensuring compatibility with modern computer systems. The choice between the two may come down to the specific input/output requirements and whether the user needs the additional analog input provided by the Audient iD4 MKII.

Signal Processing
Gain/Trim Range
Inputs: 0 to 45 dB	Mic/Hi-Z Inputs: 58 dB Hi-Z Inputs: 40 dB
High-Pass Filter

Solo/Mute
	Mute per Master

The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface offers a gain/trim range of 0 to 45 dB for its inputs. This range is suitable for various recording scenarios, providing flexibility for different microphone sensitivities and instrument levels. However, it lacks a high-pass filter feature, which could be a downside for users looking for basic frequency control directly on the interface. Additionally, the RODE AI-1 does not include solo or mute functionalities, which might be a limitation for users needing more nuanced control during recording and monitoring.
In contrast, the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface delivers a gain/trim range of 58 dB for mic/Hi-Z inputs and 40 dB for Hi-Z inputs, offering a broader range for different recording needs. Similar to the RODE AI-1, the Audient iD4 MKII does not feature a high-pass filter. However, it does include a mute function per master, providing users with a bit more control over their outputs. This feature can be particularly useful during live monitoring and recording sessions, allowing for quick muting when needed.
Overall, while both interfaces share some similarities, such as the absence of a high-pass filter, the Audient iD4 MKII provides a wider gain range and additional mute functionality, which might make it more appealing to users seeking more control and versatility in their audio interface.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Mic/Line Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output	1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel) 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output (Front Panel)
Phantom Power
48 V	48 V ± 4 V, Selectable On/Off
Digital Audio I/O

Host Connection
USB-C	1x USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
Not Specified by Manufacturer	USB 3.0 / 3.1/3.2 Gen 1
USB (Non-Host)

Sync I/O

Network I/O

MIDI I/O

The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface and the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface both serve as compact, high-quality solutions for professional audio recording and editing, yet they differ in their features and capabilities.
The RODE AI-1 is equipped with a single combo XLR-1/4" TRS mic/line input which allows for versatile connectivity options for microphones and line-level instruments. It offers two 1/4" TRS balanced line outputs for seamless integration with studio monitors and a 1/4" TRS headphone output for monitoring. It supports 48 V phantom power, making it compatible with condenser microphones. However, it lacks digital audio I/O, MIDI I/O, and network I/O capabilities. The AI-1 connects to the host via USB-C, but the specific host connection protocol is not specified by the manufacturer.
On the other hand, the Audient iD4 MKII provides a broader range of connectivity options. It features a single combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line input and an additional 1/4" TRS unbalanced Hi-Z input on the front panel, which is ideal for direct connection of electric guitars or other high-impedance instruments. For output, it offers two 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs, a 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output, and a 1/8" (3.5 mm) TRS unbalanced headphone output, both located on the front panel. This model also supports 48 V phantom power with a current of 10 mA per channel, selectable on or off. Similar to the RODE AI-1, it lacks digital audio I/O, MIDI I/O, and network I/O. The Audient iD4 MKII connects to the host through USB-C using the USB 3.0/3.1/3.2 Gen 1 protocol.
In summary, while both interfaces offer essential features like phantom power and USB-C connectivity, the Audient iD4 MKII stands out with its additional Hi-Z input and dual headphone outputs, providing more flexibility for different recording and monitoring setups. The RODE AI-1, however, remains a straightforward and effective choice for basic recording needs with its streamlined set of inputs and outputs.

Performance
Frequency Response
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±1 dB	A/D Converters: 10 Hz to 40 kHz ±0.5 dB D/A Converters: 10 Hz to 40 kHz ±0.1 dB Headphone Outputs: 10 Hz to 40 kHz ±0.1 dB Mic, Line Inputs: 10 Hz to 40 kHz ±0.5 dB (Min Gain) Hi-Z Inputs: 10 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.5 dB (Min Gain)
Maximum Output Level
Monitor Outputs: -6 dBu	Headphone Outputs: +5.46 Vrms (600-Ohm Load)
Headphone Output Power
24 mW into 32 Ohms 245 mW into 300 Ohms	223 mW into 30 Ohms (Max) 280 mW into 62 Ohms (Max) 100 mW into 600 Ohms (Max)
Impedance
Hi-Z Inputs: 0.9 Megohm Mic Inputs: 1.3 Kilohms	Mic Inputs: 2.8 Kilohms (Balanced) Line Inputs: > 8 Kilohms (Balanced)
Dynamic Range
104 dBu	A/D Converters: 120 dB (A-Weighted) D/A Converters: 125.5 dB (A-Weighted) Headphone Outputs: 125.5 dB (A-Weighted)
EIN
-128 dBA	Mic/Line Inputs: -129 dB A-Weighted

The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface and the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface both offer robust features for audio recording and production, but they differ significantly in several key areas.
Starting with frequency response, the RODE AI-1 offers a range of 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±1 dB, while the Audient iD4 MKII provides a broader spectrum. The iD4 MKII's A/D and D/A converters, headphone outputs, and mic/line inputs cover 10 Hz to 40 kHz, though with varying degrees of precision (±0.5 dB to ±0.1 dB). This broader frequency response of the Audient iD4 MKII points to potentially superior audio fidelity.
In terms of maximum output level, the RODE AI-1's monitor outputs are capped at -6 dBu, compared to the Audient iD4 MKII's headphone outputs which can reach +5.46 Vrms into a 600-Ohm load. This difference indicates that the Audient iD4 MKII may be more capable of driving headphones and monitors to higher volumes without distortion.
Regarding headphone output power, the RODE AI-1 can deliver 24 mW into 32 Ohms and 245 mW into 300 Ohms. On the other hand, the Audient iD4 MKII provides significantly higher output power, with 223 mW into 30 Ohms, 280 mW into 62 Ohms, and 100 mW into 600 Ohms. This makes the Audient iD4 MKII a more powerful option for users requiring strong headphone output.
The impedance specifications also reveal differences. The RODE AI-1 lists its Hi-Z input impedance at 0.9 Megohm and mic inputs at 1.3 Kilohms, whereas the Audient iD4 MKII offers higher mic input impedance at 2.8 Kilohms (balanced) and line inputs at >8 Kilohms (balanced). The higher impedance values of the Audient iD4 MKII could translate to better compatibility with a variety of microphones and instruments.
Dynamic range is another area where the Audient iD4 MKII excels, offering a dynamic range of 120 dB (A-Weighted) for A/D converters and 125.5 dB (A-Weighted) for D/A converters, and headphone outputs. In contrast, the RODE AI-1 has a dynamic range of 104 dBu. The wider dynamic range in the Audient iD4 MKII suggests a higher capacity for handling louder sounds and more nuanced audio detail.
Looking at the Equivalent Input Noise (EIN), the RODE AI-1 has an EIN of -128 dBA, whereas the Audient iD4 MKII boasts a slightly better EIN at -129 dB A-Weighted for mic/line inputs. Lower EIN values indicate lower noise levels, which is crucial for high-quality audio recordings.
Lastly, the Audient iD4 MKII provides additional specifications such as Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and Total Harmonic Distortion plus Noise (THD+N), where it demonstrates superior performance with lower THD+N values and higher SNR, contributing to cleaner and more accurate sound reproduction.
In summary, while both interfaces are capable, the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface stands out with its broader frequency response, higher output levels, greater headphone output power, higher impedance values, wider dynamic range, and lower noise levels, making it a more versatile and high-performance option compared to the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 kHz	44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 kHz
Sample Rate Conversion

Bit Depths
24-Bit	24-Bit
Latency
Zero-Latency Direct Monitoring	0.65 ms at 44.1 kHz (Dependent on Buffer Size, Input to Output) 0.31 ms at 96 kHz (Dependent on Buffer Size, Input to Output)

The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface and the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface are both capable audio interfaces, each with its own unique set of features.
The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface supports sample rates of 44.1, 48, 88.2, and 96 kHz, but it does not include sample rate conversion. It offers a bit depth of 24-bit and features zero-latency direct monitoring. The clocking for the AI-1 is internal, which helps in maintaining accurate timing for audio signals.
In comparison, the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface also supports sample rates of 44.1, 48, 88.2, and 96 kHz with no sample rate conversion. It provides the same 24-bit bit depth as the RODE AI-1. However, the iD4 MKII has a specified latency of 0.65 ms at 44.1 kHz and 0.31 ms at 96 kHz, which is dependent on buffer size and input to output configuration. The dBFS reference level for the Audient iD4 MKII is +12 dBu = 0 dBFS, and it uses internal sync sources for clocking.
In summary, both the RODE AI-1 and Audient iD4 MKII offer high-quality 24-bit audio with sample rates up to 96 kHz and lack sample rate conversion. The RODE AI-1 boasts zero-latency direct monitoring, while the Audient iD4 MKII provides very low latency figures dependent on buffer size and includes a dBFS reference level of +12 dBu = 0 dBFS. Both interfaces rely on internal clocking to ensure accurate audio timing.

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.10 or Later Windows 7 or Later	macOS 10.11.6 or Later macOS 11.1 or Later Windows 7 or Later 6 or Later iPadOS

The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface and the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface both offer robust OS compatibility, but there are some differences worth noting.
The RODE AI-1 is compatible with macOS 10.10 or later and Windows 7 or later, making it flexible for a wide range of operating systems. The Audient iD4 MKII, on the other hand, supports macOS 10.11.6 or later, macOS 11.1 or later, and Windows 7 or later. In addition, the Audient iD4 MKII extends its compatibility to iPadOS, which is not mentioned for the RODE AI-1.
When it comes to processor requirements, the Audient iD4 MKII specifies that it supports both Intel and Apple M1 processors for Mac, and requires a 1.6 GHz Intel Core 2 processor for PC. The RODE AI-1 does not provide detailed processor requirements in its specifications.
In terms of RAM, the Audient iD4 MKII requires a minimum of 1 GB of RAM for operation, while the RODE AI-1 does not specify any RAM requirements.
The Audient iD4 MKII also offers mobile device compatibility, supporting both iPads and iPhones, which makes it a versatile choice for users who may want to use their audio interface with multiple types of devices. This feature is not mentioned for the RODE AI-1.
For required hardware, the Audient iD4 MKII necessitates an available USB-C port and includes a USB cable. Additionally, it requires an internet connection for registration and software/driver downloads. These hardware requirements and internet connection needs are not specified for the RODE AI-1.
In summary, while both audio interfaces offer compatibility with macOS and Windows operating systems, the Audient iD4 MKII provides more detailed requirements and extends its compatibility to iPadOS and mobile devices, making it a more versatile choice for users who need flexibility across different platforms and devices.

Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface and the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface share the same power requirement specification, which is USB Bus Power. This means that both devices are powered directly through their USB-C connections without the need for an external power supply.
The RODE AI-1 is designed as a straightforward and user-friendly audio interface, making it ideal for beginners or those looking for a simple setup. It features a single XLR-1/4" combo input, allowing for both microphone and instrument connectivity. Its compact and durable build is accompanied by a high-quality preamp, ensuring clear and clean audio recordings. The AI-1 also includes direct monitoring capabilities with zero latency, providing a reliable solution for real-time audio tracking.
On the other hand, the Audient iD4 MKII aims at delivering professional-grade audio quality with a slightly more advanced feature set. It includes two inputs: one Class-A Audient Console mic preamp and one discrete JFET instrument input, catering to a wider range of recording requirements. Additionally, the iD4 MKII offers higher-grade converters, promising superior audio fidelity with greater dynamic range and lower noise. The interface also features a ScrollControl function, which transforms the volume knob into a virtual scroll wheel for controlling various software parameters, adding a layer of versatility to its use.
In summary, while both the RODE AI-1 and the Audient iD4 MKII are powered via USB Bus Power, they cater to slightly different user needs. The RODE AI-1 focuses on simplicity and ease of use, making it suitable for beginners, whereas the Audient iD4 MKII provides enhanced audio quality and additional features that may appeal to more seasoned audio professionals.

Physical
Dimensions
4.9 x 3.9 x 1.5" / 124 x 100 x 38 mm	5.2 x 4.7 x 2.4" / 13.3 x 12 x 6 cm (Including Controls and Protrusions)
Weight
19.8 oz / 561.3 g	2.2 lb / 1.0 kg

The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface and the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface differ in several key specifications, including dimensions, weight, and additional features.
The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface measures 4.9 x 3.9 x 1.5 inches (124 x 100 x 38 mm) and weighs 19.8 oz (561.3 g). This compact and lightweight design makes it easy to transport and ideal for users who need a portable solution for audio recording and production.
In contrast, the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface has dimensions of 5.2 x 4.7 x 2.4 inches (13.3 x 12 x 6 cm), which includes controls and protrusions. It weighs significantly more at 2.2 lb (1.0 kg), providing a more robust build that might appeal to users looking for a sturdier and potentially more durable interface.
Additionally, the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface includes an anti-theft feature with a Kensington Security Slot, adding an extra layer of security for those who may use the interface in public or shared spaces. This is a feature not present in the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface.
In summary, the RODE AI-1 offers a more compact and lightweight option, while the Audient iD4 MKII provides a more substantial build with added security features, catering to different user needs and preferences.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
1.155 lb	1.92 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
7 x 5.1 x 2.55"	7.5 x 6 x 3.5"

The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface and the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface offer distinct features in terms of weight and dimensions, which could influence a user’s decision based on portability and space requirements.
The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface has a package weight of 1.155 lb, making it relatively lightweight and easy to transport. It comes in a compact box with dimensions of 7 x 5.1 x 2.55 inches, indicating a space-efficient design that is likely to fit into smaller setups or travel bags without much hassle.
On the other hand, the Audient iD4 MKII USB-C Audio Interface has a package weight of 1.92 lb, which is slightly heavier compared to the RODE AI-1. However, it still remains within a manageable range for portability. The box dimensions for the Audient iD4 MKII are 7.5 x 6 x 3.5 inches, making it slightly larger in size. This could suggest a more robust build or additional features that might require a bit more space.
In summary, the RODE AI-1 is lighter and more compact, which could be an advantage for users needing a highly portable solution. The Audient iD4 MKII, while slightly heavier and larger, might offer additional features or a more sturdy build, appealing to users who prioritize these aspects.