Mackie CR4-XBT vs PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT: Which Studio Monitor is Right for You?

The Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker and the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT Studio Monitor Speaker are both excellent choices for those seeking quality audio monitoring. The Mackie CR4-XBT features a sleek and professional design with a classic black finish, making it a stylish addition to any studio setup. It boasts a power output of 50 watts and includes a 4-inch polypropylene-coated woofer and a 0.75-inch silk dome tweeter, delivering a balanced and clear sound. With built-in Bluetooth capability, these speakers allow for wireless streaming from any Bluetooth-enabled device, providing flexibility and convenience in audio playback.

On the other hand, the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT Studio Monitor Speaker offers a slightly different approach. It includes a 4.5-inch Kevlar low-frequency driver and a 1-inch silk dome tweeter, providing a slightly broader sound range. The ERIS 4.5BT also features a 50-watt power output and includes Bluetooth connectivity for seamless wireless audio streaming. What sets the ERIS 4.5BT apart is its acoustic tuning controls, allowing users to adjust the high and low frequencies, making it ideal for customizing the sound to fit the specific acoustics of the room.

Both speakers cater to a wide range of user needs, from casual listeners to professional audio engineers. While the Mackie CR4-XBT offers a straightforward, user-friendly experience with its classic design and reliable sound, the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT provides additional control for those who wish to fine-tune their audio experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two may come down to personal preference regarding design and the level of control one desires over their audio output.

In this comprehensive comparison, we will delve into the specifications, advantages, and disadvantages of the Mackie CR4-XBT and PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT studio monitor speakers. Our detailed analysis will guide you through every aspect of these products, helping you make an informed decision based on their unique features and performance metrics.

In-Depth Comparison of Mackie CR4-XBT and PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT

Mackie CR4-XBT

PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 85% of users found the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker to offer great value for the price, citing its competitive pricing compared to similar models from other brands. Users appreciated the balance between affordability and performance, mentioning that it provided a high-quality sound experience without breaking the bank. 15% of users were dissatisfied with the purchase value, feeling that the speakers did not meet their expectations in terms of performance relative to the price. Some users felt that they could find better options with more features or better sound quality for a slightly higher investment. 85% Sound Quality 80% of users were satisfied with the sound quality of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, praising its clear and balanced audio output. Many users highlighted the crisp highs and robust lows, which they found suitable for both casual listening and more critical audio work. 20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, noting that they experienced issues such as a lack of depth in the bass or muddiness in the midrange. These users often compared the speakers to higher-end models, suggesting that the CR4-XBT fell short in delivering a professional-grade audio experience. 80% Build Quality 75% of users were pleased with the build quality of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker. They noted the sturdy construction and durable materials used, which gave them confidence in the longevity and reliability of the product. 25% of users were not satisfied with the build quality, citing issues such as flimsy materials or poor assembly. Some users reported that the speakers felt less robust than expected, with concerns over long-term durability. 75% Design 90% of users appreciated the design of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, with many complimenting its sleek and modern aesthetic. The compact size and stylish appearance made it a popular choice for users looking to enhance their workspace without sacrificing functionality. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the design, mainly due to personal preference or specific aesthetic tastes. A few users mentioned that they found the design too simplistic or not in line with their desired look for studio equipment. 90% Ease of Use 88% of users found the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker easy to use, highlighting the straightforward setup process and intuitive controls. The Bluetooth connectivity was particularly praised for its convenience and ease of use. 12% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the ease of use, encountering difficulties during setup or connectivity issues. Some users reported challenges with integrating the speakers into their existing systems, which affected their overall experience. 88% Connectivity Options 82% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options offered by the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, appreciating the inclusion of Bluetooth functionality alongside traditional wired connections. This flexibility was seen as a significant advantage. 18% of users were dissatisfied with the connectivity options, primarily due to occasional connectivity dropouts or limited input options that didn't meet their specific needs. Some users felt that additional ports or more reliable wireless performance could enhance the speaker's versatility. 82% Portability 70% of users were satisfied with the portability of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, noting that its compact size made it relatively easy to move and fit into different spaces. Users appreciated the balance between size and sound output. 30% of users were dissatisfied with the portability, mentioning that the speakers were heavier or bulkier than expected for their needs. Some users were looking for a more lightweight option for frequent transportation or temporary setups. 70% Bass Response 78% of users found the bass response of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker to be satisfactory, enjoying the depth and punchiness of the low frequencies for both music and multimedia applications. 22% of users were dissatisfied with the bass response, feeling that it lacked the power or clarity needed for their audio requirements. Some users noted that the bass was either too weak or overly pronounced, affecting the overall balance of the sound. 78% Midrange Clarity 77% of users were satisfied with the midrange clarity of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, appreciating the detailed sound reproduction that made vocals and instruments stand out. 23% of users were dissatisfied with the midrange clarity, finding it lacking in precision or muddled at times. These users often compared the speakers to other models that offered more pronounced and clearer midrange frequencies. 77% High Frequency Detail 76% of users were pleased with the high-frequency detail provided by the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, noting the crisp and clear treble that enhanced their listening experience. 24% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the high-frequency detail, observing harshness or sibilance in the treble range. Some users felt that the highs lacked the smoothness and refinement found in more expensive monitors. 76% Volume Range 81% of users were satisfied with the volume range of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, finding it adequate for both near-field monitoring and casual listening in small to medium-sized rooms. 19% of users were dissatisfied with the volume range, feeling that the speakers did not reach the desired loudness or distorted at higher volumes. These users often sought more power for larger spaces or more dynamic sound environments. 81% Durability 74% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, mentioning that the speakers withstood regular use without showing signs of wear or performance degradation. 26% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the durability, noting issues such as components breaking or malfunctioning after a short period. These users were concerned about the long-term reliability of the product. 74% Warranty and Support 72% of users were satisfied with the warranty and support offered by Mackie, finding the customer service responsive and helpful in resolving any issues they encountered with the CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker. 28% of users were dissatisfied with the warranty and support, citing delays in service or inadequate assistance in addressing their concerns. Some users felt that the warranty terms were not as comprehensive as those offered by other brands. 72% Size and Fit 79% of users found the size and fit of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker to be ideal for their workspaces, appreciating the compact design that allowed for easy placement on desks or shelves. 21% of users were dissatisfied with the size and fit, finding the speakers too large for their setups or not easily accommodated in their existing arrangements. Some users wished for more flexibility in placement options. 79% Setup Instructions 83% of users were satisfied with the setup instructions provided with the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, finding them clear and easy to follow, which facilitated a smooth installation process. 17% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the setup instructions, feeling that they were too brief or lacked detail. These users often had to seek additional help or resources to complete the setup. 83% Aesthetic Appeal 87% of users were pleased with the aesthetic appeal of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, enjoying the modern and professional look that complemented various interior styles. 13% of users were dissatisfied with the aesthetic appeal, feeling that the design was too plain or did not match their personal taste. Some users desired more color or design options. 87% Bluetooth Stability 68% of users were satisfied with the Bluetooth stability of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, experiencing reliable wireless connections for their audio streaming needs. 32% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the Bluetooth stability, encountering frequent dropouts or connection issues. These users felt that the wireless performance was inconsistent and detracted from their overall experience. 68% Power Consumption 84% of users were satisfied with the power consumption of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, noting its energy efficiency and low power draw during operation. 16% of users were dissatisfied with the power consumption, primarily due to concerns about the lack of power-saving features or higher-than-expected energy use when idle. 84% Frequency Range 75% of users were satisfied with the frequency range of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, finding it sufficient for their listening and production needs. 25% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the frequency range, feeling that it did not cover the full spectrum needed for professional audio work. Some users noted gaps or roll-offs in certain frequency areas. 75% Overall Satisfaction 80% of users reported overall satisfaction with the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, appreciating the combination of sound quality, design, and price that met their expectations. 20% of users were not entirely satisfied overall, due to specific performance issues or unmet expectations compared to other high-end options. These users often sought improvements in sound quality or additional features. 80%	Purchase Value 85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT Studio Monitor Speaker. Many users found that the combination of sound quality, Bluetooth connectivity, and affordability made it a worthwhile investment. They appreciated the balance between price and performance, noting that the speakers delivered clear, accurate audio with a robust build that justified the cost. 15% of users felt dissatisfied with the purchase value, often due to comparing it with higher-end models. These users believed that for the price, the speaker should offer more advanced features or a more premium sound profile, particularly when using Bluetooth, which could sometimes lead to minor audio quality degradation. 85% Sound Quality 90% of users were impressed with the sound quality of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, highlighting its ability to deliver clear, precise audio suitable for both casual listening and more serious studio work. Users appreciated the flat frequency response, which is ideal for mixing and monitoring music, as it provides an accurate representation of the audio being played. 10% of users pointed out some dissatisfaction with the sound quality, particularly in terms of bass response. They felt that the low-end frequencies were not as pronounced as they would like, especially for genres that rely heavily on bass. This led some users to consider additional subwoofers to complement the setup. 90% Connectivity Options 88% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options provided by the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, praising the inclusion of Bluetooth as a modern, convenient feature. The availability of both wireless and wired connections allowed for flexible integration into various audio setups, catering to different user needs and preferences. 12% of users expressed dissatisfaction with connectivity options, mainly citing occasional Bluetooth connectivity issues. Some users experienced intermittent disconnections or difficulty pairing with certain devices, which impacted their overall experience when relying on wireless audio streaming. 88% Build Quality 92% of users were pleased with the build quality of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, noting its sturdy construction and high-quality materials. Users appreciated the sleek, professional design that not only enhanced their workspace aesthetics but also withstood regular use without signs of wear and tear. 8% of users were not entirely satisfied with the build quality, reporting minor issues such as surface scratches or finish imperfections upon delivery. These instances were relatively rare but affected the perception of quality for those affected. 92% Ease of Setup 93% of users found the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT easy to set up, with clear instructions and straightforward controls that allowed them to get started quickly. Many users appreciated the plug-and-play nature of the speakers, which made integrating them into existing audio setups hassle-free. 7% of users encountered difficulties during setup, often related to connecting the speakers via Bluetooth. These users found the pairing process less intuitive than expected, leading to some initial frustration before achieving a stable connection. 93% Design Aesthetics 87% of users were satisfied with the design aesthetics of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, complimenting its modern look that fit well into both home and professional studio environments. The compact size and clean lines were particularly appreciated by those with limited desk space. 13% of users were less impressed with the design, stating that it lacked the visual appeal of more expensive, stylish speakers. Some users felt the design was too basic and preferred options with more artistic or unique design elements. 87% Customer Service 82% of users reported positive experiences with customer service, highlighting responsive and helpful support when they encountered issues or had questions about their speakers. The majority felt that their concerns were addressed promptly and effectively. 18% of users were dissatisfied with customer service, mentioning delayed responses or unsatisfactory resolutions to their problems. These users felt that the support experience did not match the quality of the product itself, leading to frustration. 82% Durability 89% of users were satisfied with the durability of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, noting that the speakers remained in good working condition even after extensive use. Users appreciated the robust design that seemed built to last, which contributed to their confidence in the product's longevity. 11% of users expressed concerns about the durability, with some reporting issues like loose components or wear on the speaker grills over time. These users felt that while generally reliable, the speakers could benefit from improved quality control. 89% Weight and Portability 84% of users were satisfied with the weight and portability of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, noting that the speakers were easy to move and reposition without being too bulky. This made them suitable for users who needed to frequently change their setup or transport the speakers between locations. 16% of users felt that the speakers were heavier than expected, which could be inconvenient for those with very limited space or who needed to move them often. Some users preferred lighter alternatives that offered similar audio quality. 84% Versatility 86% of users appreciated the versatility of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, using them for a range of activities from music production to casual listening and gaming. The ability to handle different audio sources and environments made them a flexible choice for diverse audio needs. 14% of users felt the speakers lacked versatility, particularly when it came to adapting to different acoustic environments. Some users had trouble achieving optimal sound without additional acoustic treatment or equalization, limiting their perceived flexibility. 86% Volume Level 88% of users were satisfied with the volume level capabilities of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, finding them powerful enough for both small studio spaces and personal listening. Users noted that the speakers could deliver clear sound at high volumes without significant distortion. 12% of users were not entirely satisfied with the volume output, particularly in larger spaces where the speakers struggled to fill the room with sound. These users felt that while adequate for personal use, the speakers were not as powerful as they had hoped for more extensive applications. 88% Bluetooth Performance 79% of users were satisfied with the Bluetooth performance, appreciating the convenience of wireless connectivity for casual listening. Many users found the range and connection stability suitable for their needs, adding flexibility to their audio setup. 21% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the Bluetooth performance, citing issues such as latency, occasional dropouts, or difficulty in pairing with certain devices. These problems affected the overall user experience, particularly for those who relied heavily on wireless audio. 79% Frequency Response 91% of users were satisfied with the frequency response of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, praising its ability to provide a balanced and accurate representation of audio. This made them particularly popular among users involved in audio mixing and production, where precision is crucial. 9% of users noted some dissatisfaction with the frequency response, particularly at the extreme low end. These users felt that the bass could be more pronounced, which was a drawback for those who preferred a fuller sound profile. 91% Input Options 87% of users appreciated the variety of input options available on the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, including RCA, TRS, and Bluetooth. This versatility allowed users to easily connect multiple devices and switch between them with minimal hassle. 13% of users were dissatisfied with the input options, feeling that they could be more comprehensive. Some users preferred additional digital input options or more advanced connectivity features to better integrate with modern audio equipment. 87% Warranty 80% of users were satisfied with the warranty provided with the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, feeling assured by the coverage offered in case of defects or issues. The warranty was seen as a positive aspect that added value to the purchase. 20% of users were not satisfied with the warranty terms, citing limitations and exclusions that they felt should be addressed. These users believed that the warranty could be more comprehensive or offer longer coverage to better protect their investment. 80% Bass Quality 83% of users were satisfied with the bass quality of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, noting that it was adequate for most listening needs and provided a clear, punchy sound without overwhelming other frequencies. 17% of users felt that the bass quality was lacking, particularly those who enjoyed bass-heavy music genres. These users desired deeper, more resonant bass and sometimes opted to add a subwoofer to enhance the overall sound experience. 83% Treble Clarity 92% of users were pleased with the treble clarity of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, reporting crisp and clear high frequencies that added detail and depth to their audio. This clarity was particularly appreciated by users involved in music production and critical listening. 8% of users found the treble clarity to be less than ideal, sometimes describing it as slightly harsh or piercing at higher volumes. These users felt that the treble could benefit from a smoother, more refined sound profile. 92% Midrange Performance 90% of users were satisfied with the midrange performance of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, highlighting its ability to reproduce vocals and instruments with clarity and accuracy. This made the speakers a popular choice for mixing and monitoring tasks where midrange detail is crucial. 10% of users found the midrange performance lacking, sometimes perceiving it as slightly recessed or overshadowed by other frequencies. These users felt that the midrange could be more pronounced to better balance the overall sound. 90% Compatibility with Audio Equipment 86% of users were happy with the compatibility of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT with various audio equipment, noting that they integrated seamlessly into different setups without issues. The wide range of input options facilitated easy connections with mixers, interfaces, and other devices. 14% of users encountered compatibility issues, particularly with older or less common audio equipment. Some users needed additional adapters or interfaces to achieve the desired connectivity, which added complexity to their setup. 86% Power Efficiency 84% of users were satisfied with the power efficiency of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, noting that they could maintain high performance without excessive energy consumption. Users appreciated this aspect for both cost savings and environmental considerations. 16% of users felt that the power efficiency could be improved, particularly when using the speakers at higher volumes for extended periods. Some users noted a slight increase in energy consumption compared to other models, which affected their overall satisfaction. 84% Overall Satisfaction 88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, praising its combination of sound quality, design, and functionality. Many users felt that the speakers offered excellent value for money and met or exceeded their expectations in most areas. 12% of users were not fully satisfied overall, often due to specific issues such as Bluetooth performance or bass response. These users felt that while the speakers were generally good, they fell short in certain areas that were important to them. 88% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

85% of users found the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker to offer great value for the price, citing its competitive pricing compared to similar models from other brands. Users appreciated the balance between affordability and performance, mentioning that it provided a high-quality sound experience without breaking the bank.

15% of users were dissatisfied with the purchase value, feeling that the speakers did not meet their expectations in terms of performance relative to the price. Some users felt that they could find better options with more features or better sound quality for a slightly higher investment.

85%
Sound Quality

80% of users were satisfied with the sound quality of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, praising its clear and balanced audio output. Many users highlighted the crisp highs and robust lows, which they found suitable for both casual listening and more critical audio work.

20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the sound quality, noting that they experienced issues such as a lack of depth in the bass or muddiness in the midrange. These users often compared the speakers to higher-end models, suggesting that the CR4-XBT fell short in delivering a professional-grade audio experience.

80%
Build Quality

75% of users were pleased with the build quality of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker. They noted the sturdy construction and durable materials used, which gave them confidence in the longevity and reliability of the product.

25% of users were not satisfied with the build quality, citing issues such as flimsy materials or poor assembly. Some users reported that the speakers felt less robust than expected, with concerns over long-term durability.

75%
Design

90% of users appreciated the design of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, with many complimenting its sleek and modern aesthetic. The compact size and stylish appearance made it a popular choice for users looking to enhance their workspace without sacrificing functionality.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the design, mainly due to personal preference or specific aesthetic tastes. A few users mentioned that they found the design too simplistic or not in line with their desired look for studio equipment.

90%
Ease of Use

88% of users found the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker easy to use, highlighting the straightforward setup process and intuitive controls. The Bluetooth connectivity was particularly praised for its convenience and ease of use.

12% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the ease of use, encountering difficulties during setup or connectivity issues. Some users reported challenges with integrating the speakers into their existing systems, which affected their overall experience.

88%
Connectivity Options

82% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options offered by the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, appreciating the inclusion of Bluetooth functionality alongside traditional wired connections. This flexibility was seen as a significant advantage.

18% of users were dissatisfied with the connectivity options, primarily due to occasional connectivity dropouts or limited input options that didn't meet their specific needs. Some users felt that additional ports or more reliable wireless performance could enhance the speaker's versatility.

82%
Portability

70% of users were satisfied with the portability of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, noting that its compact size made it relatively easy to move and fit into different spaces. Users appreciated the balance between size and sound output.

30% of users were dissatisfied with the portability, mentioning that the speakers were heavier or bulkier than expected for their needs. Some users were looking for a more lightweight option for frequent transportation or temporary setups.

70%
Bass Response

78% of users found the bass response of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker to be satisfactory, enjoying the depth and punchiness of the low frequencies for both music and multimedia applications.

22% of users were dissatisfied with the bass response, feeling that it lacked the power or clarity needed for their audio requirements. Some users noted that the bass was either too weak or overly pronounced, affecting the overall balance of the sound.

78%
Midrange Clarity

77% of users were satisfied with the midrange clarity of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, appreciating the detailed sound reproduction that made vocals and instruments stand out.

23% of users were dissatisfied with the midrange clarity, finding it lacking in precision or muddled at times. These users often compared the speakers to other models that offered more pronounced and clearer midrange frequencies.

77%
High Frequency Detail

76% of users were pleased with the high-frequency detail provided by the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, noting the crisp and clear treble that enhanced their listening experience.

24% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the high-frequency detail, observing harshness or sibilance in the treble range. Some users felt that the highs lacked the smoothness and refinement found in more expensive monitors.

76%
Volume Range

81% of users were satisfied with the volume range of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, finding it adequate for both near-field monitoring and casual listening in small to medium-sized rooms.

19% of users were dissatisfied with the volume range, feeling that the speakers did not reach the desired loudness or distorted at higher volumes. These users often sought more power for larger spaces or more dynamic sound environments.

81%
Durability

74% of users were satisfied with the durability of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, mentioning that the speakers withstood regular use without showing signs of wear or performance degradation.

26% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the durability, noting issues such as components breaking or malfunctioning after a short period. These users were concerned about the long-term reliability of the product.

74%
Warranty and Support

72% of users were satisfied with the warranty and support offered by Mackie, finding the customer service responsive and helpful in resolving any issues they encountered with the CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker.

28% of users were dissatisfied with the warranty and support, citing delays in service or inadequate assistance in addressing their concerns. Some users felt that the warranty terms were not as comprehensive as those offered by other brands.

72%
Size and Fit

79% of users found the size and fit of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker to be ideal for their workspaces, appreciating the compact design that allowed for easy placement on desks or shelves.

21% of users were dissatisfied with the size and fit, finding the speakers too large for their setups or not easily accommodated in their existing arrangements. Some users wished for more flexibility in placement options.

79%
Setup Instructions

83% of users were satisfied with the setup instructions provided with the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, finding them clear and easy to follow, which facilitated a smooth installation process.

17% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the setup instructions, feeling that they were too brief or lacked detail. These users often had to seek additional help or resources to complete the setup.

83%
Aesthetic Appeal

87% of users were pleased with the aesthetic appeal of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, enjoying the modern and professional look that complemented various interior styles.

13% of users were dissatisfied with the aesthetic appeal, feeling that the design was too plain or did not match their personal taste. Some users desired more color or design options.

87%
Bluetooth Stability

68% of users were satisfied with the Bluetooth stability of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, experiencing reliable wireless connections for their audio streaming needs.

32% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the Bluetooth stability, encountering frequent dropouts or connection issues. These users felt that the wireless performance was inconsistent and detracted from their overall experience.

68%
Power Consumption

84% of users were satisfied with the power consumption of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, noting its energy efficiency and low power draw during operation.

16% of users were dissatisfied with the power consumption, primarily due to concerns about the lack of power-saving features or higher-than-expected energy use when idle.

84%
Frequency Range

75% of users were satisfied with the frequency range of the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, finding it sufficient for their listening and production needs.

25% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the frequency range, feeling that it did not cover the full spectrum needed for professional audio work. Some users noted gaps or roll-offs in certain frequency areas.

75%
Overall Satisfaction

80% of users reported overall satisfaction with the Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker, appreciating the combination of sound quality, design, and price that met their expectations.

20% of users were not entirely satisfied overall, due to specific performance issues or unmet expectations compared to other high-end options. These users often sought improvements in sound quality or additional features.

80%

Purchase Value

85% of users expressed satisfaction with the purchase value of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT Studio Monitor Speaker. Many users found that the combination of sound quality, Bluetooth connectivity, and affordability made it a worthwhile investment. They appreciated the balance between price and performance, noting that the speakers delivered clear, accurate audio with a robust build that justified the cost.

15% of users felt dissatisfied with the purchase value, often due to comparing it with higher-end models. These users believed that for the price, the speaker should offer more advanced features or a more premium sound profile, particularly when using Bluetooth, which could sometimes lead to minor audio quality degradation.

85%
Sound Quality

90% of users were impressed with the sound quality of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, highlighting its ability to deliver clear, precise audio suitable for both casual listening and more serious studio work. Users appreciated the flat frequency response, which is ideal for mixing and monitoring music, as it provides an accurate representation of the audio being played.

10% of users pointed out some dissatisfaction with the sound quality, particularly in terms of bass response. They felt that the low-end frequencies were not as pronounced as they would like, especially for genres that rely heavily on bass. This led some users to consider additional subwoofers to complement the setup.

90%
Connectivity Options

88% of users were satisfied with the connectivity options provided by the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, praising the inclusion of Bluetooth as a modern, convenient feature. The availability of both wireless and wired connections allowed for flexible integration into various audio setups, catering to different user needs and preferences.

12% of users expressed dissatisfaction with connectivity options, mainly citing occasional Bluetooth connectivity issues. Some users experienced intermittent disconnections or difficulty pairing with certain devices, which impacted their overall experience when relying on wireless audio streaming.

88%
Build Quality

92% of users were pleased with the build quality of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, noting its sturdy construction and high-quality materials. Users appreciated the sleek, professional design that not only enhanced their workspace aesthetics but also withstood regular use without signs of wear and tear.

8% of users were not entirely satisfied with the build quality, reporting minor issues such as surface scratches or finish imperfections upon delivery. These instances were relatively rare but affected the perception of quality for those affected.

92%
Ease of Setup

93% of users found the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT easy to set up, with clear instructions and straightforward controls that allowed them to get started quickly. Many users appreciated the plug-and-play nature of the speakers, which made integrating them into existing audio setups hassle-free.

7% of users encountered difficulties during setup, often related to connecting the speakers via Bluetooth. These users found the pairing process less intuitive than expected, leading to some initial frustration before achieving a stable connection.

93%
Design Aesthetics

87% of users were satisfied with the design aesthetics of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, complimenting its modern look that fit well into both home and professional studio environments. The compact size and clean lines were particularly appreciated by those with limited desk space.

13% of users were less impressed with the design, stating that it lacked the visual appeal of more expensive, stylish speakers. Some users felt the design was too basic and preferred options with more artistic or unique design elements.

87%
Customer Service

82% of users reported positive experiences with customer service, highlighting responsive and helpful support when they encountered issues or had questions about their speakers. The majority felt that their concerns were addressed promptly and effectively.

18% of users were dissatisfied with customer service, mentioning delayed responses or unsatisfactory resolutions to their problems. These users felt that the support experience did not match the quality of the product itself, leading to frustration.

82%
Durability

89% of users were satisfied with the durability of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, noting that the speakers remained in good working condition even after extensive use. Users appreciated the robust design that seemed built to last, which contributed to their confidence in the product's longevity.

11% of users expressed concerns about the durability, with some reporting issues like loose components or wear on the speaker grills over time. These users felt that while generally reliable, the speakers could benefit from improved quality control.

89%
Weight and Portability

84% of users were satisfied with the weight and portability of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, noting that the speakers were easy to move and reposition without being too bulky. This made them suitable for users who needed to frequently change their setup or transport the speakers between locations.

16% of users felt that the speakers were heavier than expected, which could be inconvenient for those with very limited space or who needed to move them often. Some users preferred lighter alternatives that offered similar audio quality.

84%
Versatility

86% of users appreciated the versatility of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, using them for a range of activities from music production to casual listening and gaming. The ability to handle different audio sources and environments made them a flexible choice for diverse audio needs.

14% of users felt the speakers lacked versatility, particularly when it came to adapting to different acoustic environments. Some users had trouble achieving optimal sound without additional acoustic treatment or equalization, limiting their perceived flexibility.

86%
Volume Level

88% of users were satisfied with the volume level capabilities of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, finding them powerful enough for both small studio spaces and personal listening. Users noted that the speakers could deliver clear sound at high volumes without significant distortion.

12% of users were not entirely satisfied with the volume output, particularly in larger spaces where the speakers struggled to fill the room with sound. These users felt that while adequate for personal use, the speakers were not as powerful as they had hoped for more extensive applications.

88%
Bluetooth Performance

79% of users were satisfied with the Bluetooth performance, appreciating the convenience of wireless connectivity for casual listening. Many users found the range and connection stability suitable for their needs, adding flexibility to their audio setup.

21% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the Bluetooth performance, citing issues such as latency, occasional dropouts, or difficulty in pairing with certain devices. These problems affected the overall user experience, particularly for those who relied heavily on wireless audio.

79%
Frequency Response

91% of users were satisfied with the frequency response of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, praising its ability to provide a balanced and accurate representation of audio. This made them particularly popular among users involved in audio mixing and production, where precision is crucial.

9% of users noted some dissatisfaction with the frequency response, particularly at the extreme low end. These users felt that the bass could be more pronounced, which was a drawback for those who preferred a fuller sound profile.

91%
Input Options

87% of users appreciated the variety of input options available on the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, including RCA, TRS, and Bluetooth. This versatility allowed users to easily connect multiple devices and switch between them with minimal hassle.

13% of users were dissatisfied with the input options, feeling that they could be more comprehensive. Some users preferred additional digital input options or more advanced connectivity features to better integrate with modern audio equipment.

87%
Warranty

80% of users were satisfied with the warranty provided with the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, feeling assured by the coverage offered in case of defects or issues. The warranty was seen as a positive aspect that added value to the purchase.

20% of users were not satisfied with the warranty terms, citing limitations and exclusions that they felt should be addressed. These users believed that the warranty could be more comprehensive or offer longer coverage to better protect their investment.

80%
Bass Quality

83% of users were satisfied with the bass quality of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, noting that it was adequate for most listening needs and provided a clear, punchy sound without overwhelming other frequencies.

17% of users felt that the bass quality was lacking, particularly those who enjoyed bass-heavy music genres. These users desired deeper, more resonant bass and sometimes opted to add a subwoofer to enhance the overall sound experience.

83%
Treble Clarity

92% of users were pleased with the treble clarity of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, reporting crisp and clear high frequencies that added detail and depth to their audio. This clarity was particularly appreciated by users involved in music production and critical listening.

8% of users found the treble clarity to be less than ideal, sometimes describing it as slightly harsh or piercing at higher volumes. These users felt that the treble could benefit from a smoother, more refined sound profile.

92%
Midrange Performance

90% of users were satisfied with the midrange performance of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, highlighting its ability to reproduce vocals and instruments with clarity and accuracy. This made the speakers a popular choice for mixing and monitoring tasks where midrange detail is crucial.

10% of users found the midrange performance lacking, sometimes perceiving it as slightly recessed or overshadowed by other frequencies. These users felt that the midrange could be more pronounced to better balance the overall sound.

90%
Compatibility with Audio Equipment

86% of users were happy with the compatibility of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT with various audio equipment, noting that they integrated seamlessly into different setups without issues. The wide range of input options facilitated easy connections with mixers, interfaces, and other devices.

14% of users encountered compatibility issues, particularly with older or less common audio equipment. Some users needed additional adapters or interfaces to achieve the desired connectivity, which added complexity to their setup.

86%
Power Efficiency

84% of users were satisfied with the power efficiency of the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, noting that they could maintain high performance without excessive energy consumption. Users appreciated this aspect for both cost savings and environmental considerations.

16% of users felt that the power efficiency could be improved, particularly when using the speakers at higher volumes for extended periods. Some users noted a slight increase in energy consumption compared to other models, which affected their overall satisfaction.

84%
Overall Satisfaction

88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, praising its combination of sound quality, design, and functionality. Many users felt that the speakers offered excellent value for money and met or exceeded their expectations in most areas.

12% of users were not fully satisfied overall, often due to specific issues such as Bluetooth performance or bass response. These users felt that while the speakers were generally good, they fell short in certain areas that were important to them.

88%

Pros:
Bluetooth connectivity allows for wireless streaming from devices. Compact size is ideal for small spaces or home studios. Front panel features a headphone jack and volume control for easy access. Offers good sound quality with decent bass response for its size. Affordable price point for budget-conscious buyers.	Bluetooth connectivity for wireless streaming. Compact size suitable for small spaces. Accurate sound reproduction with Kevlar low-frequency transducers. Includes both balanced and unbalanced inputs for versatile connectivity. Front-panel volume control for easy adjustments.

Cons:
Limited power output may not be suitable for large rooms or professional studio use. Some users may find the bass response lacking without a subwoofer. Build quality may feel less robust compared to higher-end monitors. Lacks advanced features like room correction or detailed EQ adjustments.	Limited low-end response compared to larger monitors. Bluetooth can introduce latency, affecting real-time monitoring. Plastic enclosure may not be as durable as wood. Not ideal for large studio environments due to size and power limitations.

Key Specs
Monitor Type & Configuration
Active 2-Way	Active 2-Way
Total Power Output
50 W per Monitor	25 W RMS per Monitor
Tweeter
1x 0.75" / 19.1 mm Silk Dome	1x 1" / 25.4 mm Silk Dome
Woofer
1x 4" / 10.16 cm Polypropylene Cone	1x 4.5" / 11.4 cm Cone
Frequency Range
60 Hz to 20 kHz (-10 dB) 65 Hz to 20 kHz (-3 dB)	70 Hz to 20 kHz
Audio I/O
2x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Input 1x Stereo 2RCA Unbalanced Input 2x Push Terminal Unbalanced Output 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Output	2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Input 1x Stereo 2RCA Unbalanced Line Input 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Line Input 1x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output 2x Push Terminal Passive Speaker Output
Digital Audio I/O

Network I/O

Wireless
Bluetooth	Bluetooth

The Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker and the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT Studio Monitor Speaker are both active 2-way studio monitors designed for audio professionals. The Mackie CR4-XBT features a total power output of 50 W per monitor, providing a more robust sound compared to the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT, which has a total power output of 25 W RMS per monitor. This difference in power output can significantly impact the overall loudness and clarity of the sound, especially in larger spaces or during more dynamic audio playback.Show More

General
Number of Included Monitors
Stereo Pair	Stereo Pair
Enclosure
Bass-Reflex/Ported	Bass-Reflex/Ported
Total Power Output
50 W per Monitor	25 W RMS per Monitor

The Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker and the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT Studio Monitor Speaker both come as a Stereo Pair, making them suitable for a variety of audio applications. This feature ensures that users can enjoy a balanced soundstage, which is crucial for accurate audio mixing and listening experiences. Both monitors utilize a Bass-Reflex/Ported enclosure design, enhancing their low-frequency response and providing deeper bass tones.Show More

Drivers per Monitor
Tweeter
1x 0.75" / 19.1 mm Silk Dome	1x 1" / 25.4 mm Silk Dome
Woofer
1x 4" / 10.16 cm Polypropylene Cone	1x 4.5" / 11.4 cm Cone
Amplifiers
Full-Range: 50 W Peak Class-D	Full-Range: 25 W RMS Class-AB

The Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker features a 0.75" silk dome tweeter and a 4" polypropylene cone woofer, providing a well-balanced sound profile suitable for various audio applications. Its 50 W Peak Class-D amplifier ensures powerful audio output, making it a great choice for users who require higher volume levels without compromising on sound quality. The speaker is designed for those looking for an affordable yet effective solution for studio monitoring.Show More

Power
AC Input Power
100 to 240 VAC, 50/60 Hz	100 to 240 VAC, 50/60 Hz

The Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker and the PreSonus ERIS 4.5BT Studio Monitor Speaker both feature similar power requirements, with an AC Input Power of 100 to 240 VAC and a frequency of 50/60 Hz. This allows for versatility in different regions, making both speakers suitable for international use without the need for additional transformers.Show More

Physical
Color
Black	Black
Monitor Orientation
Vertical	Vertical
Dimensions (W x H x D)
6.1 x 8.9 x 8.3" / 15.5 x 22.6 x 21.1 cm (Each)	6.4 x 9.5 x 7" / 162.6 x 241.3 x 177.8 mm (Each)
Weight
10.1 lb / 4.6 kg (Pair)	2.0 lb / 0.9 kg (Each)

The Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker features a sleek black color and is designed for vertical orientation. It is constructed from MDF, providing durability and a solid sound foundation. This model has no mounting points and operates effectively within a temperature range of 32 to 104°F (0 to 40°C). The dimensions of each speaker are 6.1 x 8.9 x 8.3 inches (15.5 x 22.6 x 21.1 cm), and the overall weight for the pair is 10.1 lb (4.6 kg).Show More

Packaging Info
Package Weight
11.61 lb	12.675 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
16.8 x 11 x 9"	19.2 x 13.4 x 9.6"

The Mackie CR4-XBT Studio Monitor Speaker boasts a package weight of 11.61 lb, making it a lightweight option for those looking for portability and ease of setup. The box dimensions measure 16.8 x 11 x 9", which provides a compact design suitable for various studio spaces, ensuring it can fit comfortably on desks or shelves without taking up too much room.Show More