Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 vs Audient EVO 16: Detailed Comparison and Review

The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the Audient EVO 16 24x24 USB Audio Interface are both high-quality audio interfaces designed for professional and home studio use, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences.
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 (3rd Gen) is renowned for its exceptional sound quality, versatility, and robust build. It features 18 inputs and 20 outputs, including eight Scarlett mic preamps with the renowned Focusrite sound, two high-headroom instrument inputs, and eight balanced line inputs. The third-generation model boasts upgraded preamps with Air mode, which adds brightness and openness to vocal recordings. The interface is equipped with USB-C connectivity for faster data transfer and low latency, making it ideal for recording and monitoring. Additionally, it includes a comprehensive software package, including Ableton Live Lite, Pro Tools First, and Focusrite’s Red Plug-in Suite, providing a complete solution for musicians and producers.
On the other hand, the Audient EVO 16 is a 24x24 USB audio interface that combines studio-grade sound quality with innovative features. It has eight EVO preamps with Smartgain, which automatically sets the level for you, ensuring optimal recording levels without any guesswork. The EVO 16 also features advanced converters with 121dB dynamic range, offering pristine audio clarity. One of its standout features is the Motion UI control system, which provides a modern touchpoint interface, making it intuitive and easy to use. The interface also includes USB 2.0 connectivity for wide compatibility and stable performance. The EVO 16 is designed to be user-friendly and efficient, making it suitable for both beginners and experienced users.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 (3rd Gen) is ideal for users seeking a reliable, high-quality interface with extensive I/O options and a comprehensive software bundle. Its robust construction and Air mode preamps make it a solid choice for professional recordings. The Audient EVO 16, with its Smartgain feature and Motion UI, offers an innovative and user-friendly experience, combined with exceptional audio quality. It is perfect for those who prioritize ease of use and cutting-edge technology in their recording setup. Both interfaces offer excellent value, but the choice depends on individual needs and preferences.

Specifications, Advantages, and Disadvantages

Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 USB-C Audio Interface (3rd Generation)

Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 (3rd Generation)

Audient EVO 16

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 85% of users appreciated the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, primarily due to its comprehensive feature set relative to its price point. Users highlighted that the interface offers high-quality preamps, plenty of inputs and outputs, and stable performance, making it a solid investment for both amateur and professional audio setups. Many users felt that the interface provides a similar level of quality to more expensive equipment, which adds to its perceived value. 15% of users found the purchase value lacking, often due to their expectations not being met when comparing the interface to more high-end alternatives. Some users felt that while the features are impressive, the price was still slightly too high for their needs, particularly when they did not require all the functionality offered. Additionally, a few users experienced issues with the software that influenced their perception of value. 85% Quality of Materials 90% of users praised the quality of materials used in the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting its robust and durable build. Many users commented on the solid construction, which inspires confidence in its longevity and ability to withstand regular studio use. The sleek design and sturdy knobs and buttons were particularly appreciated, contributing to a professional feel. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of materials, citing minor issues such as plastic components that felt less durable. Some users also mentioned that the unit was heavier than expected, which affected portability for those who frequently move equipment between locations. Despite these concerns, they were relatively few compared to the overall satisfaction. 90% Ease of Use 80% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 user-friendly, with straightforward setup and intuitive controls. The interface's compatibility with popular DAWs was a significant advantage, allowing for seamless integration into existing workflows. Many users appreciated the clear labeling and logical layout, which reduced the learning curve for new users. 20% of users experienced difficulties with ease of use, often related to initial setup issues or software installation challenges. Some users found the multiple input and output options overwhelming without prior experience, leading to confusion. A few users also encountered problems with firmware updates, which impacted their overall experience. 80% Sound Quality 92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, praising its clarity and precision. The high-quality preamps and converters were frequently highlighted for their ability to deliver professional-grade audio, even in demanding recording environments. Users appreciated the clean and transparent sound, which enhanced their production capabilities. 8% of users were less impressed with the sound quality, often due to specific issues such as noise interference or perceived limitations in dynamic range. A few users noted that while the sound quality was generally good, it did not meet their high expectations based on previous experiences with more expensive equipment. 92% Customer Support 75% of users reported positive experiences with Focusrite's customer support, citing helpful and responsive service when resolving issues. Many users appreciated the availability of online resources and tutorials, which facilitated troubleshooting and enhanced their understanding of the product. 25% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, often due to delayed response times or unresolved technical issues. Some users felt that the support team lacked sufficient knowledge to address their specific problems, leading to frustration. Additionally, a few users encountered difficulties accessing timely help during critical situations. 75% Software Integration 78% of users were satisfied with the software integration capabilities of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting its compatibility with various digital audio workstations. The inclusion of bundled software was seen as a valuable addition, enhancing the overall production experience and providing additional creative tools. 22% of users faced challenges with software integration, often due to compatibility issues or difficulties in installing and configuring the bundled applications. Some users reported that the software did not always function as expected, leading to frustration and additional troubleshooting efforts. 78% Latency Performance 82% of users were pleased with the low-latency performance of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, which facilitated smooth recording and playback without noticeable delays. The use of USB-C connectivity was particularly praised for its speed and reliability, contributing to an efficient workflow. 18% of users experienced latency issues, often related to specific system configurations or software settings. Some users found that achieving optimal performance required additional tweaking and adjustments, which detracted from their overall satisfaction. 82% Portability 70% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 reasonably portable, appreciating its compact design that allowed for easy transportation between studio sessions. The sturdy build was seen as an advantage for those who needed to move the interface frequently. 30% of users were less satisfied with the portability, mainly due to the interface's weight and size. Some users felt that it was not the most convenient option for mobile recording setups, especially when compared to lighter and more compact alternatives. 70% Durability 88% of users commended the durability of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting its ability to withstand regular use without significant wear and tear. The robust construction and quality materials were frequently mentioned as factors that contributed to its long-lasting performance. 12% of users raised concerns about durability, often due to specific issues such as loose knobs or minor cosmetic damage over time. Some users felt that certain components could be improved to ensure even greater resilience under heavy use. 88% Aesthetic Design 85% of users appreciated the aesthetic design of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, praising its sleek and modern appearance. The interface's visual appeal was seen as a reflection of its professional quality, enhancing the overall studio environment. 15% of users were less impressed with the aesthetic design, often citing subjective preferences for different styles or colors. Some users felt that while the design was functional, it lacked the distinctive flair they preferred in studio equipment. 85% Compatibility 80% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, highlighting its seamless integration with various operating systems and audio software. The interface's ability to work with both Mac and Windows platforms was a significant advantage for many users. 20% of users encountered compatibility issues, often related to specific software or hardware configurations. Some users had difficulties with driver installations or experienced conflicts with existing equipment, which impacted their overall satisfaction. 80% Input/Output Options 90% of users were highly satisfied with the extensive input and output options available on the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20. The multiple channels and connectivity choices were seen as a key feature, providing flexibility for various recording and mixing setups. 10% of users found the input/output options overwhelming, particularly if they had simpler recording needs. Some users felt that the abundance of choices added unnecessary complexity to their workflow, especially if they did not utilize all the available connections. 90% Preamps 91% of users were impressed with the quality of the preamps in the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting their clean and transparent sound. Many users highlighted the preamps as a standout feature, enhancing the overall audio quality and allowing for precise capture of sound sources. 9% of users had concerns about the preamps, often related to specific use cases or preferences for different tonal characteristics. Some users felt that the preamps could be improved to offer greater warmth or coloration, depending on their recording style. 91% Stability 87% of users reported stable and reliable performance from the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, with minimal crashes or technical issues during use. The interface's dependability was seen as a crucial factor for uninterrupted recording sessions. 13% of users experienced stability issues, often related to software glitches or firmware updates. Some users encountered occasional crashes or connectivity problems, which disrupted their workflow and required additional troubleshooting. 87% Driver Support 77% of users were satisfied with the driver support for the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting regular updates and compatibility with major operating systems. Many users appreciated the ease of accessing drivers and the proactive approach to resolving potential issues. 23% of users had challenges with driver support, often related to installation difficulties or outdated drivers causing compatibility issues. Some users felt that the support for certain operating systems could be improved to ensure smoother performance. 77% Bundled Software 83% of users appreciated the bundled software that comes with the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, finding it to be a valuable addition to their audio production toolkit. The inclusion of DAWs and plugins was particularly appreciated, providing users with a complete package to start recording and mixing. 17% of users were less impressed with the bundled software, often due to limitations in functionality or compatibility issues with their preferred DAWs. Some users felt that the software did not add significant value to their setup, especially if they already owned similar tools. 83% USB-C Connectivity 89% of users praised the USB-C connectivity of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, citing its fast data transfer rates and reliable connection. The modern interface was seen as a significant improvement over older connectivity standards, enhancing overall performance. 11% of users encountered issues with USB-C connectivity, often related to compatibility with existing equipment or the need for additional adapters. Some users felt that while USB-C is advantageous, it required them to upgrade other components in their setup, which was not always convenient. 89% Control Software 79% of users found the control software for the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 to be intuitive and effective for managing various settings and configurations. The software's interface was praised for its user-friendly design and ease of use. 21% of users faced challenges with the control software, often due to bugs or limitations in functionality. Some users reported difficulties in navigating the interface or accessing advanced settings, which impacted their overall experience. 79% Recording Quality 90% of users were satisfied with the recording quality achieved with the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting its ability to capture clear and detailed audio. The interface's performance in various recording scenarios was highly praised, contributing to professional-grade results. 10% of users were less satisfied with the recording quality, often due to specific issues such as noise or interference in certain environments. Some users felt that while the quality was generally good, it did not meet their expectations for more critical recording applications. 90% Versatility 88% of users appreciated the versatility of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, highlighting its ability to adapt to a wide range of recording and mixing tasks. The interface's flexibility in handling different audio sources and configurations was seen as a key strength. 12% of users found the versatility to be limited, often due to specific needs that the interface could not accommodate. Some users felt that while the interface was versatile, it lacked certain specialized features required for particular audio production tasks. 88%	Overall Purchase Value 85% of users felt that the Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface provides excellent value for money. They appreciated its high-quality preamps, versatile connectivity options, and reliable performance, considering it a worthwhile investment for both home and professional studios. 15% of users found the price to be slightly higher than expected, especially when compared to other interfaces with similar features, leading to their dissatisfaction with the overall purchase value. 85% Sound Quality 90% of users praised the sound quality of the Audient EVO 16, highlighting its clear and transparent audio reproduction. The preamps were especially noted for their ability to deliver clean recordings without noise, making it a preferred choice for audiophiles. 10% of users mentioned that they experienced occasional issues with sound clarity, particularly at higher gain levels, which detracted from their overall satisfaction with the sound quality. 90% Build Quality 88% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the Audient EVO 16, describing it as robust and durable. They appreciated the solid construction which gave them confidence in its longevity and reliability. 12% of users expressed concerns over the build quality, citing instances of loose knobs or buttons that felt less sturdy, which led to a reduction in their trust in the product's durability. 88% Ease of Use 84% of users found the Audient EVO 16 intuitive and user-friendly, with a straightforward setup process and easy-to-navigate controls, making it accessible for both beginners and seasoned recording professionals. 16% of users found the interface to be less intuitive, particularly when configuring advanced settings, which resulted in a steeper learning curve than anticipated. 84% Software Compatibility 80% of users were satisfied with the software compatibility of the Audient EVO 16, noting seamless integration with various DAWs and operating systems, which enhanced their overall recording experience. 20% of users faced issues with software compatibility, particularly with less common DAWs, which led to frustration and additional troubleshooting efforts. 80% Latency Performance 87% of users were pleased with the low latency performance of the Audient EVO 16, which allowed for real-time monitoring and smooth recording sessions, crucial for professional audio production. 13% of users reported latency issues, particularly when using multiple inputs simultaneously, which impacted their ability to record efficiently. 87% Design Aesthetics 82% of users appreciated the sleek and modern design of the Audient EVO 16, which not only looked professional but also complemented their studio setup aesthetically. 18% of users were less impressed with the design, feeling that it lacked distinctive features or was too plain compared to other interfaces in the same price range. 82% Customer Support 78% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Audient, citing prompt responses and helpful assistance in resolving their inquiries and technical issues. 22% of users expressed dissatisfaction with customer support, mentioning delayed responses and less than helpful interactions that left their issues unresolved. 78% Portability 75% of users found the Audient EVO 16 to be reasonably portable, with a compact design that made it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions. 25% of users felt that the interface was bulkier than expected, making it less convenient to carry around frequently, especially for those needing a more travel-friendly solution. 75% Durability 83% of users were confident in the durability of the Audient EVO 16, with many reporting that it withstood everyday use without showing signs of wear or malfunction. 17% of users experienced issues with durability, noting that some components became worn or damaged quicker than anticipated, raising concerns about the product's long-term resilience. 83% Input/Output Options 86% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the Audient EVO 16, appreciating its flexibility to accommodate various recording setups and equipment. 14% of users felt that the I/O options were somewhat limited for their specific needs, particularly in environments requiring more extensive connectivity. 86% Driver Stability 81% of users were happy with the driver stability of the Audient EVO 16, experiencing smooth operation without frequent crashes or disconnections during use. 19% of users encountered stability issues with the drivers, including occasional crashes or the need for frequent updates to maintain functionality, causing interruptions in their workflow. 81% Expandability 79% of users appreciated the expandability options of the Audient EVO 16, allowing them to grow their setup with additional gear as their recording needs evolved. 21% of users found the expandability options to be somewhat constrained, particularly those seeking more extensive integration with other high-end equipment. 79% Headphone Amplifier Quality 85% of users were impressed with the quality of the headphone amplifier in the Audient EVO 16, providing clear and loud monitoring essential for detailed audio work. 15% of users found the headphone amplifier to be lacking in power or clarity, which impacted their ability to monitor recordings accurately. 85% Preamp Quality 89% of users praised the preamp quality of the Audient EVO 16, noting its ability to deliver pristine audio with a low noise floor, making it ideal for capturing high-quality recordings. 11% of users felt the preamps did not meet their expectations, citing issues with noise or coloration that affected their recording quality. 89% A/D Conversion 88% of users were satisfied with the A/D conversion capabilities of the Audient EVO 16, highlighting its ability to convert analog signals to digital with high fidelity and precision. 12% of users encountered issues with the A/D conversion, noting occasional artifacts or discrepancies in the digital output that affected their recordings. 88% D/A Conversion 86% of users were pleased with the D/A conversion of the Audient EVO 16, which provided accurate and detailed playback for critical listening scenarios. 14% of users were dissatisfied with the D/A conversion, experiencing occasional inconsistencies in playback quality that did not meet their professional standards. 86% Metering and Monitoring 82% of users appreciated the metering and monitoring features of the Audient EVO 16, which offered clear visual feedback and control over their audio levels. 18% of users found the metering and monitoring options somewhat lacking, particularly in more complex recording setups where more detailed level monitoring was needed. 82% Visual Display 77% of users liked the visual display features of the Audient EVO 16, considering it helpful for quick adjustments and monitoring during sessions. 23% of users felt the visual display was too basic or not intuitive enough, which made it harder to navigate and control their settings efficiently. 77% Power Supply 80% of users were content with the power supply of the Audient EVO 16, finding it reliable and easy to integrate into their existing power setups without issues. 20% of users encountered problems with the power supply, including incompatibility with certain setups or insufficient power for all functionalities, leading to operational interruptions. 80% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

85% of users appreciated the purchase value of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, primarily due to its comprehensive feature set relative to its price point. Users highlighted that the interface offers high-quality preamps, plenty of inputs and outputs, and stable performance, making it a solid investment for both amateur and professional audio setups. Many users felt that the interface provides a similar level of quality to more expensive equipment, which adds to its perceived value.

15% of users found the purchase value lacking, often due to their expectations not being met when comparing the interface to more high-end alternatives. Some users felt that while the features are impressive, the price was still slightly too high for their needs, particularly when they did not require all the functionality offered. Additionally, a few users experienced issues with the software that influenced their perception of value.

85%
Quality of Materials

90% of users praised the quality of materials used in the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting its robust and durable build. Many users commented on the solid construction, which inspires confidence in its longevity and ability to withstand regular studio use. The sleek design and sturdy knobs and buttons were particularly appreciated, contributing to a professional feel.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of materials, citing minor issues such as plastic components that felt less durable. Some users also mentioned that the unit was heavier than expected, which affected portability for those who frequently move equipment between locations. Despite these concerns, they were relatively few compared to the overall satisfaction.

90%
Ease of Use

80% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 user-friendly, with straightforward setup and intuitive controls. The interface's compatibility with popular DAWs was a significant advantage, allowing for seamless integration into existing workflows. Many users appreciated the clear labeling and logical layout, which reduced the learning curve for new users.

20% of users experienced difficulties with ease of use, often related to initial setup issues or software installation challenges. Some users found the multiple input and output options overwhelming without prior experience, leading to confusion. A few users also encountered problems with firmware updates, which impacted their overall experience.

80%
Sound Quality

92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, praising its clarity and precision. The high-quality preamps and converters were frequently highlighted for their ability to deliver professional-grade audio, even in demanding recording environments. Users appreciated the clean and transparent sound, which enhanced their production capabilities.

8% of users were less impressed with the sound quality, often due to specific issues such as noise interference or perceived limitations in dynamic range. A few users noted that while the sound quality was generally good, it did not meet their high expectations based on previous experiences with more expensive equipment.

92%
Customer Support

75% of users reported positive experiences with Focusrite's customer support, citing helpful and responsive service when resolving issues. Many users appreciated the availability of online resources and tutorials, which facilitated troubleshooting and enhanced their understanding of the product.

25% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, often due to delayed response times or unresolved technical issues. Some users felt that the support team lacked sufficient knowledge to address their specific problems, leading to frustration. Additionally, a few users encountered difficulties accessing timely help during critical situations.

75%
Software Integration

78% of users were satisfied with the software integration capabilities of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting its compatibility with various digital audio workstations. The inclusion of bundled software was seen as a valuable addition, enhancing the overall production experience and providing additional creative tools.

22% of users faced challenges with software integration, often due to compatibility issues or difficulties in installing and configuring the bundled applications. Some users reported that the software did not always function as expected, leading to frustration and additional troubleshooting efforts.

78%
Latency Performance

82% of users were pleased with the low-latency performance of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, which facilitated smooth recording and playback without noticeable delays. The use of USB-C connectivity was particularly praised for its speed and reliability, contributing to an efficient workflow.

18% of users experienced latency issues, often related to specific system configurations or software settings. Some users found that achieving optimal performance required additional tweaking and adjustments, which detracted from their overall satisfaction.

82%
Portability

70% of users found the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 reasonably portable, appreciating its compact design that allowed for easy transportation between studio sessions. The sturdy build was seen as an advantage for those who needed to move the interface frequently.

30% of users were less satisfied with the portability, mainly due to the interface's weight and size. Some users felt that it was not the most convenient option for mobile recording setups, especially when compared to lighter and more compact alternatives.

70%
Durability

88% of users commended the durability of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting its ability to withstand regular use without significant wear and tear. The robust construction and quality materials were frequently mentioned as factors that contributed to its long-lasting performance.

12% of users raised concerns about durability, often due to specific issues such as loose knobs or minor cosmetic damage over time. Some users felt that certain components could be improved to ensure even greater resilience under heavy use.

88%
Aesthetic Design

85% of users appreciated the aesthetic design of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, praising its sleek and modern appearance. The interface's visual appeal was seen as a reflection of its professional quality, enhancing the overall studio environment.

15% of users were less impressed with the aesthetic design, often citing subjective preferences for different styles or colors. Some users felt that while the design was functional, it lacked the distinctive flair they preferred in studio equipment.

85%
Compatibility

80% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, highlighting its seamless integration with various operating systems and audio software. The interface's ability to work with both Mac and Windows platforms was a significant advantage for many users.

20% of users encountered compatibility issues, often related to specific software or hardware configurations. Some users had difficulties with driver installations or experienced conflicts with existing equipment, which impacted their overall satisfaction.

80%
Input/Output Options

90% of users were highly satisfied with the extensive input and output options available on the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20. The multiple channels and connectivity choices were seen as a key feature, providing flexibility for various recording and mixing setups.

10% of users found the input/output options overwhelming, particularly if they had simpler recording needs. Some users felt that the abundance of choices added unnecessary complexity to their workflow, especially if they did not utilize all the available connections.

90%
Preamps

91% of users were impressed with the quality of the preamps in the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting their clean and transparent sound. Many users highlighted the preamps as a standout feature, enhancing the overall audio quality and allowing for precise capture of sound sources.

9% of users had concerns about the preamps, often related to specific use cases or preferences for different tonal characteristics. Some users felt that the preamps could be improved to offer greater warmth or coloration, depending on their recording style.

91%
Stability

87% of users reported stable and reliable performance from the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, with minimal crashes or technical issues during use. The interface's dependability was seen as a crucial factor for uninterrupted recording sessions.

13% of users experienced stability issues, often related to software glitches or firmware updates. Some users encountered occasional crashes or connectivity problems, which disrupted their workflow and required additional troubleshooting.

87%
Driver Support

77% of users were satisfied with the driver support for the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting regular updates and compatibility with major operating systems. Many users appreciated the ease of accessing drivers and the proactive approach to resolving potential issues.

23% of users had challenges with driver support, often related to installation difficulties or outdated drivers causing compatibility issues. Some users felt that the support for certain operating systems could be improved to ensure smoother performance.

77%
Bundled Software

83% of users appreciated the bundled software that comes with the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, finding it to be a valuable addition to their audio production toolkit. The inclusion of DAWs and plugins was particularly appreciated, providing users with a complete package to start recording and mixing.

17% of users were less impressed with the bundled software, often due to limitations in functionality or compatibility issues with their preferred DAWs. Some users felt that the software did not add significant value to their setup, especially if they already owned similar tools.

83%
USB-C Connectivity

89% of users praised the USB-C connectivity of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, citing its fast data transfer rates and reliable connection. The modern interface was seen as a significant improvement over older connectivity standards, enhancing overall performance.

11% of users encountered issues with USB-C connectivity, often related to compatibility with existing equipment or the need for additional adapters. Some users felt that while USB-C is advantageous, it required them to upgrade other components in their setup, which was not always convenient.

89%
Control Software

79% of users found the control software for the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 to be intuitive and effective for managing various settings and configurations. The software's interface was praised for its user-friendly design and ease of use.

21% of users faced challenges with the control software, often due to bugs or limitations in functionality. Some users reported difficulties in navigating the interface or accessing advanced settings, which impacted their overall experience.

79%
Recording Quality

90% of users were satisfied with the recording quality achieved with the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, noting its ability to capture clear and detailed audio. The interface's performance in various recording scenarios was highly praised, contributing to professional-grade results.

10% of users were less satisfied with the recording quality, often due to specific issues such as noise or interference in certain environments. Some users felt that while the quality was generally good, it did not meet their expectations for more critical recording applications.

90%
Versatility

88% of users appreciated the versatility of the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, highlighting its ability to adapt to a wide range of recording and mixing tasks. The interface's flexibility in handling different audio sources and configurations was seen as a key strength.

12% of users found the versatility to be limited, often due to specific needs that the interface could not accommodate. Some users felt that while the interface was versatile, it lacked certain specialized features required for particular audio production tasks.

88%

Overall Purchase Value

85% of users felt that the Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface provides excellent value for money. They appreciated its high-quality preamps, versatile connectivity options, and reliable performance, considering it a worthwhile investment for both home and professional studios.

15% of users found the price to be slightly higher than expected, especially when compared to other interfaces with similar features, leading to their dissatisfaction with the overall purchase value.

85%
Sound Quality

90% of users praised the sound quality of the Audient EVO 16, highlighting its clear and transparent audio reproduction. The preamps were especially noted for their ability to deliver clean recordings without noise, making it a preferred choice for audiophiles.

10% of users mentioned that they experienced occasional issues with sound clarity, particularly at higher gain levels, which detracted from their overall satisfaction with the sound quality.

90%
Build Quality

88% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the Audient EVO 16, describing it as robust and durable. They appreciated the solid construction which gave them confidence in its longevity and reliability.

12% of users expressed concerns over the build quality, citing instances of loose knobs or buttons that felt less sturdy, which led to a reduction in their trust in the product's durability.

88%
Ease of Use

84% of users found the Audient EVO 16 intuitive and user-friendly, with a straightforward setup process and easy-to-navigate controls, making it accessible for both beginners and seasoned recording professionals.

16% of users found the interface to be less intuitive, particularly when configuring advanced settings, which resulted in a steeper learning curve than anticipated.

84%
Software Compatibility

80% of users were satisfied with the software compatibility of the Audient EVO 16, noting seamless integration with various DAWs and operating systems, which enhanced their overall recording experience.

20% of users faced issues with software compatibility, particularly with less common DAWs, which led to frustration and additional troubleshooting efforts.

80%
Latency Performance

87% of users were pleased with the low latency performance of the Audient EVO 16, which allowed for real-time monitoring and smooth recording sessions, crucial for professional audio production.

13% of users reported latency issues, particularly when using multiple inputs simultaneously, which impacted their ability to record efficiently.

87%
Design Aesthetics

82% of users appreciated the sleek and modern design of the Audient EVO 16, which not only looked professional but also complemented their studio setup aesthetically.

18% of users were less impressed with the design, feeling that it lacked distinctive features or was too plain compared to other interfaces in the same price range.

82%
Customer Support

78% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by Audient, citing prompt responses and helpful assistance in resolving their inquiries and technical issues.

22% of users expressed dissatisfaction with customer support, mentioning delayed responses and less than helpful interactions that left their issues unresolved.

78%
Portability

75% of users found the Audient EVO 16 to be reasonably portable, with a compact design that made it easy to transport for mobile recording sessions.

25% of users felt that the interface was bulkier than expected, making it less convenient to carry around frequently, especially for those needing a more travel-friendly solution.

75%
Durability

83% of users were confident in the durability of the Audient EVO 16, with many reporting that it withstood everyday use without showing signs of wear or malfunction.

17% of users experienced issues with durability, noting that some components became worn or damaged quicker than anticipated, raising concerns about the product's long-term resilience.

83%
Input/Output Options

86% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the Audient EVO 16, appreciating its flexibility to accommodate various recording setups and equipment.

14% of users felt that the I/O options were somewhat limited for their specific needs, particularly in environments requiring more extensive connectivity.

86%
Driver Stability

81% of users were happy with the driver stability of the Audient EVO 16, experiencing smooth operation without frequent crashes or disconnections during use.

19% of users encountered stability issues with the drivers, including occasional crashes or the need for frequent updates to maintain functionality, causing interruptions in their workflow.

81%
Expandability

79% of users appreciated the expandability options of the Audient EVO 16, allowing them to grow their setup with additional gear as their recording needs evolved.

21% of users found the expandability options to be somewhat constrained, particularly those seeking more extensive integration with other high-end equipment.

79%
Headphone Amplifier Quality

85% of users were impressed with the quality of the headphone amplifier in the Audient EVO 16, providing clear and loud monitoring essential for detailed audio work.

15% of users found the headphone amplifier to be lacking in power or clarity, which impacted their ability to monitor recordings accurately.

85%
Preamp Quality

89% of users praised the preamp quality of the Audient EVO 16, noting its ability to deliver pristine audio with a low noise floor, making it ideal for capturing high-quality recordings.

11% of users felt the preamps did not meet their expectations, citing issues with noise or coloration that affected their recording quality.

89%
A/D Conversion

88% of users were satisfied with the A/D conversion capabilities of the Audient EVO 16, highlighting its ability to convert analog signals to digital with high fidelity and precision.

12% of users encountered issues with the A/D conversion, noting occasional artifacts or discrepancies in the digital output that affected their recordings.

88%
D/A Conversion

86% of users were pleased with the D/A conversion of the Audient EVO 16, which provided accurate and detailed playback for critical listening scenarios.

14% of users were dissatisfied with the D/A conversion, experiencing occasional inconsistencies in playback quality that did not meet their professional standards.

86%
Metering and Monitoring

82% of users appreciated the metering and monitoring features of the Audient EVO 16, which offered clear visual feedback and control over their audio levels.

18% of users found the metering and monitoring options somewhat lacking, particularly in more complex recording setups where more detailed level monitoring was needed.

82%
Visual Display

77% of users liked the visual display features of the Audient EVO 16, considering it helpful for quick adjustments and monitoring during sessions.

23% of users felt the visual display was too basic or not intuitive enough, which made it harder to navigate and control their settings efficiently.

77%
Power Supply

80% of users were content with the power supply of the Audient EVO 16, finding it reliable and easy to integrate into their existing power setups without issues.

20% of users encountered problems with the power supply, including incompatibility with certain setups or insufficient power for all functionalities, leading to operational interruptions.

80%

Pros:
High-quality preamps with Air mode for enhanced sound. 8 mic/line inputs and 10 line outputs for versatile connectivity. USB-C connectivity for faster data transfer and low latency. Comprehensive software bundle including DAWs and plug-ins. Expandable via ADAT for additional inputs and outputs.	High-quality preamps with clean and transparent audio. 24x24 I/O configuration provides ample connectivity options. Smartgain feature for automatic gain adjustment. Low-latency performance suitable for real-time recording and monitoring. Durable and compact design, making it portable.

Cons:
Higher price point compared to entry-level interfaces. Might be overkill for small home studios with minimal input needs. No Thunderbolt support, which might be preferable for some users.	Relatively high price point compared to other interfaces with similar features. Lack of onboard DSP effects. Some users may find the software interface less intuitive. Limited compatibility with older operating systems.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 8 Inputs / 10 Outputs Digital: 10 Inputs / 10 Outputs	24 Inputs / 24 Outputs
Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	96 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
8 Preamps	8 Preamps
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input 6x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 10x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Monitor Output 2x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 6x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 8x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 2x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output
Digital Audio I/O
1x RCA Coaxial S/PDIF Input 1x RCA Coaxial S/PDIF Output 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Input (S/MUX Support) 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT Input (S/MUX Support) 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Output (S/MUX Support) 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT Output (S/MUX Support)	2x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Input 2x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Output
Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.12 macOS 10.13 macOS 10.14 macOS 10.15 macOS 11 Windows 7 or Later	macOS Windows
Power Requirements
AC Input	AC Input

The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the Audient EVO 16 24x24 USB Audio Interface are both robust solutions for audio recording and production, but they differ in several key specifications.
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 offers a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz / 24-Bit, which is higher than the Audient EVO 16's 96 kHz / 24-Bit. Both interfaces feature 8 microphone preamps, but in terms of analog audio I/O, the Scarlett 18i20 provides 2 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced mic/line/Hi-Z inputs and 6 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line inputs. In contrast, the Audient EVO 16 also includes 2 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced mic/line/Hi-Z inputs and 6 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line inputs, but offers 8 balanced 1/4" TRS line outputs compared to the Scarlett's 10.
For digital audio I/O, the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 provides a comprehensive set of options: 1x RCA Coaxial S/PDIF input and output, 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF input (with S/MUX support), 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT input (with S/MUX support), 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF output (with S/MUX support), and 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT output (with S/MUX support). The Audient EVO 16, on the other hand, includes 2x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF inputs and 2x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF outputs, making it more versatile in terms of optical connectivity.
Both interfaces use a USB-C host connection and are compatible with macOS and Windows operating systems. However, the Scarlett 18i20 specifies compatibility with a range of macOS versions (from 10.12 up to 11) and Windows 7 or later, while the Audient EVO 16 broadly lists compatibility with macOS and Windows, without specifying particular versions.
In terms of power requirements, both interfaces require an AC input for operation. Both also include 2x 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone outputs for monitoring purposes.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 excels with a higher maximum sampling rate and a more diverse range of analog and digital I/O options. The Audient EVO 16, while offering a lower maximum sampling rate, provides more total channels of I/O and a straightforward set of optical digital connections. Both are capable interfaces, but the choice between them may come down to specific needs for connectivity and sampling rates.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 8 Inputs / 10 Outputs Digital: 10 Inputs / 10 Outputs	24 Inputs / 24 Outputs
Built-In DSP

Maximum Sampling Rate
192 kHz / 24-Bit	96 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
8 Preamps	8 Preamps
Built-In Microphone

Input Level Adjustment
8x Knob	Automatic Knob
Expansion Slots

When comparing the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the Audient EVO 16 24x24 USB Audio Interface, several key differences and similarities emerge based on the specified features.
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 offers a total of 18 input channels and 20 output channels, split between 8 analog inputs, 10 digital inputs, 10 analog outputs, and 10 digital outputs. In contrast, the Audient EVO 16 provides a more extensive I/O capability with 24 inputs and 24 outputs, all of which are analog. This makes the EVO 16 a more versatile option in terms of sheer input/output capacity.
Both interfaces lack built-in DSP, meaning they do not offer onboard digital signal processing capabilities. Users relying on DSP might need to consider external or software-based processing solutions.
In terms of sampling rates, the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 supports a higher maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz at 24-bit resolution, which is double that of the Audient EVO 16's maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz at 24-bit resolution. This higher sampling rate could be beneficial for those requiring the utmost in audio fidelity, though it may not be necessary for all applications.
Both interfaces feature 8 microphone preamps and do not include built-in microphones. This makes them equally suited for recording scenarios that require multiple mic inputs, such as drum kits or ensemble performances.
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 provides input level adjustment via 8 individual knobs, giving users manual control over their input levels. In contrast, the Audient EVO 16 offers automatic input level adjustment in addition to manual control through a knob, which can simplify the setup process and ensure optimal levels without requiring as much manual intervention.
Neither interface includes expansion slots, meaning users are limited to the I/O and features provided out-of-the-box without options for further expansion through additional hardware cards.
In summary, the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 and Audient EVO 16 cater to different needs within the audio interface market. The Scarlett 18i20 offers higher sampling rates and manual input control, while the EVO 16 provides greater I/O capacity and automatic input level adjustment for ease of use. Both are capable interfaces with multiple preamps, but the choice between them will depend on specific user requirements regarding I/O flexibility, sampling rates, and ease of setup.

Signal Processing
Pad
-10 dB (Switchable per Channel)	Line: -10 dB
Gain/Trim Range
Mic/Line Inputs: 56 dB	58 dB (Mic/Line/DI Inputs)
Solo/Mute
Mute per Master	Solo, Mute per Input Channel

The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the Audient EVO 16 24x24 USB Audio Interface offer distinct features that cater to different recording and production needs.
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 features a -10 dB pad that is switchable per channel, providing flexibility in managing input levels for various sources. It offers a gain/trim range of 56 dB for its mic/line inputs, making it capable of handling a wide variety of input levels effectively. However, it lacks a high-pass filter, which could be a consideration for users who need to filter out low-frequency noise directly at the input stage. Additionally, the Scarlett 18i20 provides a mute function per master channel, allowing users to quickly mute the master output when needed.
In comparison, the Audient EVO 16 features a fixed -10 dB pad specifically for line inputs, also aiding in managing high-level signals. It boasts a slightly higher gain/trim range of 58 dB for its mic/line/DI inputs, offering a bit more headroom and flexibility in input management. Unlike the Scarlett 18i20, the EVO 16 includes solo and mute functions per input channel, giving users more granular control over individual tracks during monitoring and mixing sessions.
In summary, the Audient EVO 16 provides a more comprehensive set of features with solo and mute options per input channel and a slightly higher gain range, while the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 offers switchable pads per channel and master mute functionality. The choice between these interfaces will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user, particularly in terms of input control and monitoring capabilities.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input 6x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 10x 1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Line/Monitor Output 2x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced/Unbalanced Mic/Line/Hi-Z Input (Front Panel) 6x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 8x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 2x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output
Phantom Power
48 V, Selectable On/Off (on 8 Channels)	48 V ± 4 V, Selectable On/Off (Selectable on Individual Inputs)
Digital Audio I/O
1x RCA Coaxial S/PDIF Input 1x RCA Coaxial S/PDIF Output 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Input (S/MUX Support) 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT Input (S/MUX Support) 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Output (S/MUX Support) 1x TOSLINK Optical ADAT Output (S/MUX Support)	2x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Input 2x TOSLINK Optical ADAT / S/PDIF Output
Host Connection
1x USB-C	1x USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0	USB 2.0
USB (Non-Host)

Sync I/O
1x BNC Word Clock Output	1x BNC Word Clock Output
Network I/O

MIDI I/O
1x DIN 5-Pin Input 1x DIN 5-Pin Output

When comparing the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the Audient EVO 16 24x24 USB Audio Interface, several key features stand out that differentiate the two products.
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 offers a range of analog audio I/O options, including 2 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced mic/line/Hi-Z inputs and 6 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line inputs. It provides a total of 10 1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced line/monitor outputs and 2 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone outputs. Phantom power is selectable on all 8 channels. In terms of digital audio I/O, the Scarlett 18i20 includes 1 RCA coaxial S/PDIF input and output, and multiple TOSLINK optical ADAT inputs and outputs with S/MUX support. It connects to the host via a USB-C connection, using the USB 2.0 protocol, and it includes sync I/O with 1 BNC word clock output. Additionally, the Scarlett 18i20 has MIDI I/O with 1 DIN 5-pin input and 1 DIN 5-pin output.
The Audient EVO 16 also features a robust set of analog audio I/O options, with 2 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced/unbalanced mic/line/Hi-Z inputs on the front panel and 6 combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line inputs. It offers 8 1/4" TRS balanced line outputs and 2 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone outputs. Phantom power is selectable on individual inputs, with a current specification of 10 mA per channel. The EVO 16's digital audio I/O includes 2 TOSLINK optical ADAT/S/PDIF inputs and outputs. Like the Scarlett 18i20, it connects to the host via a USB-C connection using the USB 2.0 protocol and includes sync I/O with 1 BNC word clock output. However, the EVO 16 does not feature any MIDI I/O.
In summary, both the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 and the Audient EVO 16 provide comprehensive connectivity options, with the Scarlett 18i20 offering more extensive digital I/O options and MIDI connectivity, while the EVO 16 provides individual phantom power control on inputs. Both interfaces connect via USB-C using the USB 2.0 protocol and include BNC word clock outputs for synchronization.

Performance
Frequency Response
20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.1 dB	Mic, Line: 10 Hz to 40 kHz ±0.5 dB Hi-Z: 10 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.5 dB Headphone: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB Digital A/D Converters: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB Digital D/A Converters: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB
Maximum Input Level
Mic Inputs: +9 dBu (Min Gain) +16 dBu (Min Gain, with Pad) Hi-Z Inputs: +12.5 dBu (Min Gain) +14 dBu (Min Gain, with Pad) Line Inputs: +22 dBu (Min Gain) +29 dBu (Min Gain, with Pad)	Mic/Line: +16 dBu Hi-Z: +10 dBu
Maximum Output Level
Line Outputs: +15.5 dBu (Balanced) Headphone Outputs: +7 dBu	Headphone: +11.25 dBu Line: +12 dBu
Impedance
Mic Inputs: 3 Kilohms Hi-Z Inputs: 1.5 Megohms Line Inputs: 60 Kilohms Line Outputs: 430 Ohms Headphone Outputs: < 1 Ohm	Mic Inputs: > 3 Kilohms (Balanced) Line Inputs: > 10 Kilohms (Balanced) Hi-Z Inputs: 500 Kilohms Line Outputs: < 50 Ohms Headphone Outputs: < 50 Ohms
Dynamic Range
Mic Inputs: 111 dBA Hi-Z Inputs: 110 dBA Line Inputs: 110.5 dBA Line Outputs: 108.5 dBA Headphone Outputs: 104 dBA	Digital A/D Converters: 112.5 dBA (A-Weighted) Digital D/A Converters: 121 dBA (A-Weighted)
THD+N
Mic Inputs: < 0.0012% Hi-Z Inputs: < 0.03% Line Inputs: < 0.002% Line Outputs: < 0.002% Headphone Outputs: < 0.002%	Mic/Line Inputs: < 0.0015% Hi-Z Inputs: < 0.1% Digital A/D Converters: < 0.001% Digital D/A Converters: < 0.001% Headphone Outputs: < 0.001%

The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the Audient EVO 16 24x24 USB Audio Interface both offer robust feature sets designed to meet the needs of professional audio engineers and musicians, but they differ in several key specifications.
In terms of frequency response, the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 offers a range of 20 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.1 dB, which is standard for high-quality audio interfaces. The Audient EVO 16, however, provides a broader frequency response with its mic and line inputs ranging from 10 Hz to 40 kHz ±0.5 dB, and its Hi-Z, headphone, and digital converters offering a range of 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB. This indicates that the EVO 16 can handle a wider range of frequencies with greater precision, making it potentially more suitable for applications requiring extended frequency response.
When it comes to maximum input level, the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 delivers up to +29 dBu on line inputs (with pad), +16 dBu on mic inputs (with pad), and +14 dBu on Hi-Z inputs (with pad). In contrast, the Audient EVO 16 offers a maximum input level of +16 dBu for mic/line inputs and +10 dBu for Hi-Z inputs. This suggests that the Scarlett 18i20 can handle hotter input signals without distortion, which can be advantageous in high-gain recording scenarios.
Regarding output levels, the Scarlett 18i20 provides a maximum of +15.5 dBu on line outputs and +7 dBu on headphone outputs. The EVO 16 offers +12 dBu on line outputs and a higher +11.25 dBu on headphone outputs, which may result in better headphone monitoring fidelity and volume.
The impedance characteristics also differ between the two interfaces. The Scarlett 18i20 features mic input impedance of 3 Kilohms, Hi-Z input impedance of 1.5 Megohms, line input impedance of 60 Kilohms, line output impedance of 430 Ohms, and headphone output impedance of less than 1 Ohm. In comparison, the EVO 16 offers mic input impedance greater than 3 Kilohms, balanced line input impedance greater than 10 Kilohms, Hi-Z input impedance of 500 Kilohms, line output impedance of less than 50 Ohms, and headphone output impedance of less than 50 Ohms. The lower output impedance of the EVO 16 suggests it may provide better performance with a wider range of connected equipment.
For dynamic range, the Scarlett 18i20 provides 111 dBA on mic inputs, 110 dBA on Hi-Z inputs, 110.5 dBA on line inputs, 108.5 dBA on line outputs, and 104 dBA on headphone outputs. The EVO 16, on the other hand, boasts 112.5 dBA for its digital A/D converters and an even higher 121 dBA for its digital D/A converters, indicating superior overall dynamic range performance, especially in digital conversion.
In terms of Total Harmonic Distortion plus Noise (THD+N), the Scarlett 18i20 performs exceptionally well with figures such as less than 0.0012% on mic inputs and less than 0.002% on line and headphone outputs. The EVO 16 also maintains low THD+N values, with less than 0.0015% for mic/line inputs and less than 0.001% for digital A/D and D/A converters, showcasing excellent overall audio fidelity.
Finally, the Equivalent Input Noise (EIN) of the Scarlett 18i20 is -128 dB A-Weighted for mic inputs, which is a high standard for noise performance. For the Audient EVO 16, the Common Mode Rejection Ratio (CMRR) for mic inputs is greater than 80 dB at 1 kHz, indicating effective noise cancellation for balanced input signals.
Overall, both interfaces offer excellent audio performance, but the Audient EVO 16 stands out with its wider frequency response, higher dynamic range for digital conversions, and better output impedance characteristics, while the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 excels in handling higher input levels and offers very low THD+N. Choosing between them would depend on specific needs such as the required frequency range, input and output levels, and overall dynamic range requirements.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
Up to 192 kHz (AD/DA Conversion)	44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 kHz
Bit Depths
Up to 24-Bit (AD/DA Conversion)	24-Bit

The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the Audient EVO 16 24x24 USB Audio Interface differ in several key aspects of their specifications.
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 offers sample rates up to 192 kHz for analog-to-digital (AD) and digital-to-analog (DA) conversion, while the Audient EVO 16 supports sample rates of 44.1, 48, 88.2, and 96 kHz. This makes the Scarlett 18i20 more versatile in terms of higher sample rate support, which may be crucial for users requiring maximum audio fidelity.
In terms of bit depth, both interfaces support up to 24-bit conversion, ensuring high-resolution audio capture and playback for professional-grade sound quality.
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 also includes multiple sync sources, such as ADAT, internal clock, and S/PDIF, offering more flexibility for integrating with other digital audio equipment. In contrast, the Audient EVO 16 does not specify additional sync sources beyond its standard operation.
Regarding dBFS reference levels, the Audient EVO 16 specifies input and output reference levels, with inputs at +10.5 dBu equaling 0 dBFS and outputs at +12 dBu equaling 0 dBFS. The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 does not provide specific dBFS reference levels in its primary specifications.
Overall, the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 stands out with higher sample rate capabilities and multiple sync source options, while the Audient EVO 16 provides detailed dBFS reference level specifications for both inputs and outputs.

Audio Storage & Playback
Memory Card Slot

The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the Audient EVO 16 24x24 USB Audio Interface both share a common feature in that neither includes a memory card slot. This indicates that both interfaces are designed to rely on other forms of data storage and connectivity, typically through direct USB connection to a computer or other recording devices.
The absence of a memory card slot in both the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 and the Audient EVO 16 means that users will need to manage their recordings and data transfers through their connected computers or external storage solutions. This design choice aligns with the professional and semi-professional user base these interfaces target, who often require more robust and versatile storage options than memory cards can provide.
In terms of usage, this shared characteristic suggests that both interfaces prioritize high-quality audio conversion and connectivity over onboard storage capabilities. Users looking for interfaces with built-in storage would need to explore other options, as both the Scarlett 18i20 and the EVO 16 are focused on delivering high-fidelity audio performance and comprehensive I/O options without integrating memory card slots into their feature sets.

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.12 macOS 10.13 macOS 10.14 macOS 10.15 macOS 11 Windows 7 or Later	macOS Windows
Mobile App Compatible
Yes: iPadOS Only

The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the Audient EVO 16 24x24 USB Audio Interface are both high-quality audio interfaces that cater to different user needs.
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 boasts a wide range of OS compatibility, supporting macOS versions from 10.12 to 11, as well as Windows 7 or later. This makes it a versatile choice for users with varied operating systems. Additionally, it is compatible with mobile apps, specifically for iPadOS, although it does not support direct mobile device connectivity. The interface requires an available USB 2.0 port and includes a USB cable. An internet connection is necessary for downloading the required software and drivers, ensuring that users have access to the latest updates and features.
In contrast, the Audient EVO 16 24x24 USB Audio Interface offers compatibility with both macOS and Windows operating systems, though it does not specify the range of versions it supports. Unlike the Scarlett 18i20, the EVO 16 does not offer compatibility with mobile apps, indicating a focus on desktop or laptop use rather than mobile integration.
In summary, while both interfaces provide robust support for macOS and Windows, the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 offers broader OS compatibility and mobile app support for iPadOS, making it a more flexible option for users who may require mobile integration. The Audient EVO 16, on the other hand, is more streamlined for desktop use without the added mobile app compatibility.

Power
Power Requirements
AC Input	AC Input
AC Input Power
100 to 240 VAC, 50 / 60 Hz	90 to 250 VAC, 50 / 60 Hz
Power Consumption
30 W	20 W

The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the Audient EVO 16 24x24 USB Audio Interface both cater to professional audio needs, each with distinct power specifications.
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 features an AC input power range of 100 to 240 VAC, operating at 50/60 Hz, and has a power consumption of 30 W. This makes it a robust unit designed to handle a wide range of voltage inputs, suitable for various studio environments worldwide.
On the other hand, the Audient EVO 16 also operates with an AC input but offers a broader input power range of 90 to 250 VAC at 50/60 Hz. It consumes less power at 20 W, indicating a more energy-efficient design while still maintaining high performance.
In summary, both interfaces are versatile in terms of global AC compatibility, but the Audient EVO 16 stands out with its wider voltage range and lower power consumption, making it a more energy-efficient choice for users.

Physical
Rackmount Size
1 RU (with Included Hardware)	1 RU
Dimensions
19 x 10.23 x 1.83" / 48.3 x 25.98 x 4.65 cm	16.1 x 14.5 x 3.5" / 40.9 x 36.8 x 8.9 cm
Weight
7.2 lb / 3.3 kg	8.8 lb / 4.0 kg

The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the Audient EVO 16 24x24 USB Audio Interface are both rackmountable units designed to fit into a 1 RU space. However, they differ in their physical dimensions and weight.
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 measures 19 x 10.23 x 1.83 inches (48.3 x 25.98 x 4.65 cm) and weighs 7.2 lb (3.3 kg). Its relatively compact depth of 10.23 inches makes it suitable for setups where space is limited. The weight of 7.2 lb also ensures that it is a manageable addition to most racks without requiring additional support.
On the other hand, the Audient EVO 16 is slightly larger with dimensions of 16.1 x 14.5 x 3.5 inches (40.9 x 36.8 x 8.9 cm) and weighs 8.8 lb (4.0 kg). This unit is deeper at 14.5 inches, which may require more rack depth space. Additionally, it is marginally heavier at 8.8 lb, which might necessitate sturdier rack mounting for secure installation.
In summary, while both the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 and the Audient EVO 16 are 1 RU rackmount units, the Scarlett 18i20 is more compact and lighter, making it a better fit for tighter spaces and lighter rack setups. The EVO 16, with its larger dimensions and greater weight, may require more consideration for space and support but could offer additional features and robustness in construction.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
9.8 lb	8.82 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
23.7 x 12.8 x 3.5"	17.6 x 15.4 x 3.5"

The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface (3rd Generation) and the Audient EVO 16 24x24 USB Audio Interface are both highly regarded in the audio interface market, offering robust features suited for professional audio recording and production. When it comes to physical specifications, the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 has a package weight of 9.8 pounds and box dimensions of 23.7 x 12.8 x 3.5 inches. In contrast, the Audient EVO 16 has a slightly lighter package weight of 8.82 pounds and more compact box dimensions of 17.6 x 15.4 x 3.5 inches.
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20's heavier weight and larger size might suggest a more substantial build or additional components housed within its structure. This could be a consideration for users who prefer a more robust physical presence in their studio setup. On the other hand, the Audient EVO 16's lighter and more compact design could be advantageous for users who need to save space or prefer a more portable option without sacrificing professional-grade capabilities.
Both interfaces offer a plethora of input and output options, but these specific physical specifications highlight the slight differences in their form factors, potentially influencing user preference based on the physical layout and portability needs of their recording environment.