Audient EVO 4 vs RODE AI-1: Comprehensive USB-C Audio Interface Comparison

The RODE AI-1 and the Audient EVO 4 are both highly regarded USB-C audio interfaces, each offering unique features tailored to different user needs. Below is a detailed comparison to help potential buyers make an informed decision.
The RODE AI-1 is a compact and straightforward audio interface designed with simplicity and high-quality performance in mind. It features a single combo jack input that supports both XLR and 1/4" connections, allowing for versatile input options such as microphones and instruments. The AI-1 delivers pristine audio quality with a high-resolution 24-bit/96kHz conversion rate, ensuring professional-grade recordings. It also includes a balanced 1/4" output for studio monitors and a high-quality headphone amplifier for zero-latency monitoring. The AI-1 is known for its durability and user-friendly design, making it an excellent choice for podcasters, musicians, and voice-over artists looking for a plug-and-play experience without sacrificing sound quality.
On the other hand, the Audient EVO 4 offers a more feature-rich package with a focus on innovation and ease of use. This interface includes two combo jack inputs, allowing for dual mic/instrument recording simultaneously. It also boasts a high-resolution 24-bit/96kHz conversion rate, ensuring clear and detailed audio capture. One of the standout features of the EVO 4 is its Smartgain function, which automatically adjusts input levels to prevent clipping and distortion, making it ideal for beginners and professionals who want a hassle-free setup. Additionally, the EVO 4 provides a loopback function, which is particularly useful for live streaming and podcasting, allowing users to capture computer audio alongside their microphones. The interface also includes a high-quality headphone amplifier and balanced 1/4" outputs for studio monitors, ensuring comprehensive monitoring options.
In conclusion, both the RODE AI-1 and the Audient EVO 4 are excellent USB-C audio interfaces, each with its own strengths. The RODE AI-1 excels in simplicity and build quality, making it perfect for users who need a reliable, high-quality interface with minimal setup. The Audient EVO 4, with its additional inputs, Smartgain feature, and loopback functionality, offers more versatility and user-friendly features, catering to a broader range of recording scenarios and user experience levels. Depending on your specific needs and preferences, either of these interfaces could be a great addition to your recording setup.

Detailed Specifications, Advantages, and Disadvantages

Audient EVO 4

RODE AI-1

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews
Purchase Value 85% of users found the purchase value of the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface to be excellent. They praised its affordability compared to other interfaces offering similar quality and features. The combination of professional-grade sound and user-friendly interface made the EVO 4 a worthwhile investment for both beginners and experienced users. 15% of users felt dissatisfied, mainly due to expectations of more advanced features at a similar price point. Some users compared it to higher-tier audio interfaces and found the EVO 4 lacking in certain premium functionalities. 85% Quality of Materials 80% of users appreciated the build quality of the Audient EVO 4, noting its sturdy construction and durability. The materials used in its design were considered robust, ensuring longevity and consistent performance over time. 20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the materials, describing them as feeling somewhat 'plasticky' or less premium than expected. These users anticipated a more metallic finish and felt the interface could be more resistant to wear and tear. 80% Ease of Use 90% of users lauded the EVO 4 for its ease of use, highlighting the intuitive layout and straightforward setup process. The Smartgain feature was particularly praised for simplifying the recording process, making it accessible even for those new to audio interfaces. 10% of users found the learning curve steeper than anticipated, especially when integrating the device with certain DAWs or when seeking to maximize its potential features. This minority felt that initial setup instructions could be more comprehensive. 90% Sound Quality 92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality delivered by the Audient EVO 4. They noted the clarity and precision in audio capture, attributing these qualities to the high-quality preamps and converters. The interface was often compared favorably to more expensive models. 8% of users expressed dissatisfaction, pointing out occasional background noise or interference in specific recording environments. These users expected a completely noise-free experience and suggested that the noise floor could be improved. 92% Portability 88% of users were pleased with the portability of the EVO 4, finding its compact design and lightweight nature perfect for mobile recording setups. This portability was a major plus for users who needed to work in various locations. 12% of users felt the interface could be even more compact for easier transport in smaller bags or cases. Additionally, some mentioned that while the device was portable, the accompanying cables could be more travel-friendly. 88% Driver Stability 82% of users reported stable and reliable performance from the EVO 4's drivers, noting minimal dropouts or latency issues during recording sessions. The drivers were generally easy to install and provided consistent results across different systems. 18% of users encountered stability issues, such as occasional disconnections or compatibility problems with specific operating systems. These users suggested improvements in firmware updates to address these concerns. 82% Customer Support 78% of users found the customer support for Audient products, including the EVO 4, to be responsive and helpful. Many appreciated the prompt responses and effective solutions provided by the support team. 22% of users were dissatisfied, citing slow response times and unresolved issues. Some users felt that the support team could be more knowledgeable about technical problems specific to the EVO 4. 78% Design Aesthetics 86% of users appreciated the sleek and modern design of the EVO 4. The minimalist aesthetic and easy-to-read controls were particularly appealing, making the interface a visually attractive addition to any studio setup. 14% of users were less impressed with the design, finding it somewhat plain or lacking distinctive features that make it stand out. They suggested more customizable options or color variations to enhance its visual appeal. 86% Feature Set 84% of users were satisfied with the feature set of the EVO 4, especially the innovative Smartgain function and loopback capabilities. These features were highly valued by podcasters and streamers for their convenience and functionality. 16% of users felt that the feature set could be expanded. Some expected additional inputs or outputs and more advanced routing options, which they believed would enhance the interface's versatility and appeal. 84% Integration with DAWs 87% of users reported seamless integration of the EVO 4 with various DAWs, highlighting the ease of setting up and using the interface with popular software like Ableton Live and Logic Pro. The compatibility across multiple platforms was a significant benefit. 13% of users faced challenges with DAW integration, noting occasional issues with recognition or configuration settings. These users suggested that more detailed guidance or tutorials could assist in resolving such problems. 87% Latency 89% of users were happy with the low latency performance of the EVO 4, praising its ability to deliver real-time monitoring without noticeable delay. This capability was crucial for live recording and streaming applications. 11% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older systems or during high-demand tasks. They recommended optimization options or settings adjustments to further reduce latency. 89% Durability 81% of users felt confident in the durability of the EVO 4, mentioning the solid construction and resilience of the device under regular use. This durability was a key factor in their positive long-term experience. 19% of users questioned the device's longevity, citing concerns over the durability of knobs and connectors. They suggested improvements in the build quality of these components to enhance overall durability. 81% Setup Process 88% of users found the setup process of the EVO 4 straightforward and quick, allowing them to start recording within minutes. The simplicity of connecting and configuring the device was a major convenience for users. 12% of users experienced difficulties during setup, often related to driver installation or configuration with their computer systems. They recommended clearer instructions or more detailed setup guides to assist new users. 88% Headphone Output Quality 85% of users praised the quality of the headphone output, noting the clear and accurate sound reproduction. This aspect was particularly important for monitoring and mixing tasks. 15% of users felt the headphone output could be improved, mentioning issues like insufficient volume levels or slight distortion at higher volumes. They suggested enhancements to the amplifier quality for better performance. 85% Microphone Preamp Quality 91% of users were impressed with the microphone preamp quality, which provided clean and transparent sound capture with minimal noise. This feature was highly valued by musicians and vocalists for its professional-level performance. 9% of users were less satisfied, citing specific instances of noise or interference in certain environments. They suggested that further refinement in preamp design could mitigate these issues. 91% USB-C Connectivity 93% of users appreciated the USB-C connectivity, which ensured fast data transfer and reliable power delivery. This modern connection standard was a key advantage for users with newer devices. 7% of users encountered connectivity issues, often related to incompatible cables or ports. They recommended clearer compatibility information and potentially including a USB-C to USB-A adapter. 93% Loopback Functionality 86% of users found the loopback functionality of the EVO 4 extremely useful, especially for podcasting and live streaming. This feature allowed for easy routing of audio from different sources, enhancing the flexibility of the interface. 14% of users struggled with configuring loopback settings, experiencing difficulties in achieving the desired audio routing. They suggested more detailed instructions or user support for this feature. 86% Compatibility with Operating Systems 84% of users were satisfied with the operating system compatibility of the EVO 4, highlighting its smooth operation on both Windows and macOS platforms. The plug-and-play nature was a significant convenience for many users. 16% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with Linux systems or during updates to newer OS versions. They recommended expanding support and providing more frequent driver updates. 84% Control Knob Functionality 82% of users valued the functionality of the control knob, which allowed for precise adjustments and easy navigation of settings. The tactile feel and responsiveness were often highlighted as positive aspects. 18% of users felt the control knob could be improved, noting occasional issues with responsiveness or durability. They suggested enhancements to the knob's design for a smoother user experience. 82% Overall Satisfaction 88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Audient EVO 4, citing its combination of high-quality sound, user-friendly features, and reliable performance as key factors in their positive experience. The interface met or exceeded expectations for most users. 12% of users were less satisfied overall, often due to specific issues like driver stability or feature limitations that impacted their experience. They recommended addressing these concerns to improve the product's appeal. 88%	purchase value 85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the combination of high-quality audio output and affordable pricing, making it accessible for both amateur and professional audio enthusiasts. Users felt that the interface offered excellent performance without breaking the bank, which was especially appealing to those who were budget-conscious. 15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, citing that similar products with more features were available at a comparable price. Some users felt that the interface lacked advanced options that could have justified the price point, leading them to believe they were not getting the best value for their money. 85% quality of materials 90% of users were pleased with the quality of materials used in the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. Many commented on its robust build and high-quality components, which contributed to a perception of durability and reliability. Users appreciated the metal casing, which provided a sturdy feel and assured them of the product's longevity. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of materials, mentioning that the unit felt heavier and bulkier than expected. A few users experienced issues with the knobs and buttons, reporting that they felt loose or less responsive over time, which detracted from the overall quality perception. 90% ease of use 88% of users found the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface easy to use, highlighting its plug-and-play functionality and straightforward design. The interface was praised for its intuitive controls, which made it accessible to beginners and professionals alike, allowing users to focus more on their creative process rather than technical setup. 12% of users were not satisfied with the ease of use, mainly due to initial setup challenges. Some users encountered difficulties with driver installation and compatibility issues with certain operating systems, which required additional troubleshooting and technical knowledge. 88% sound quality 92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its ability to deliver clear and crisp audio, which significantly enhanced their recording and playback experiences. Users noted that the preamps were quiet and offered a professional-grade sound that exceeded their expectations. 8% of users were disappointed with the sound quality, pointing out occasional noise interference and less than optimal performance when compared to higher-end models. A few users experienced problems with signal stability, which affected the overall audio output during critical recording sessions. 92% compatibility 83% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface with various devices and operating systems. They appreciated that it worked seamlessly with most popular DAWs and platforms, allowing them to integrate it easily into their existing setups without significant adjustments. 17% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with older operating systems and less common DAWs. Some users reported that the interface required specific drivers that were not readily available or resulted in latency problems, which hampered their recording sessions. 83% design 87% of users were satisfied with the design of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated its sleek and modern appearance, as well as the compact size which made it portable and easy to incorporate into any workspace. The minimalist design was also noted as a positive aspect, providing an aesthetically pleasing addition to their audio gear. 13% of users were dissatisfied with the design, noting that the interface's compactness sometimes made it feel cramped, especially when connecting multiple devices. A few users expressed a preference for more visible labeling on the controls and connections, which could have improved usability in low-light environments. 87% durability 89% of users expressed satisfaction with the durability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They were impressed by its robust construction, which they felt could withstand regular use and transport without easily succumbing to wear and tear. The metal casing was specifically mentioned as a factor that contributed to its perceived durability. 11% of users were not satisfied with the durability, reporting issues like premature wear on the knobs and switches. Some users experienced loose connections after extended use, which undermined their confidence in the product's long-term reliability. 89% portability 86% of users were satisfied with the portability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated its lightweight design and compact form factor, which made it easy to transport and ideal for on-the-go recording sessions. The interface was often praised for fitting comfortably into backpacks and small carry cases. 14% of users were dissatisfied with the portability, citing that the interface, while compact, required additional cables and adapters for certain setups, which added to the bulk. Some users found it inconvenient to constantly disconnect and reconnect the device when moving between locations. 86% latency 84% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found that it provided smooth and responsive audio processing, which was crucial for live monitoring and recording applications. Many users highlighted its real-time performance as a key benefit. 16% of users experienced dissatisfaction with latency issues, particularly when using the interface with certain DAWs or plugins. Some users noted occasional delays that affected the synchronization of audio tracks, which was problematic for time-sensitive recordings. 84% driver stability 82% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They reported a reliable connection and consistent performance across various sessions, which minimized interruptions and technical difficulties during critical tasks. 18% of users were dissatisfied with driver stability, encountering frequent disconnections and crashes. Some users struggled with maintaining a stable connection, especially during extended recording sessions, which affected their workflow and productivity. 82% customer support 81% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by RODE for the AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the prompt and helpful responses from support staff, which resolved their queries effectively and enhanced their overall experience with the product. 19% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, reporting delays in response times and a lack of comprehensive solutions to their problems. Some users felt that the support team lacked technical knowledge, which left their issues unresolved. 81% software integration 80% of users were satisfied with the software integration capabilities of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found it compatible with a wide range of DAWs and appreciated the seamless integration with most audio editing software, which facilitated a smooth workflow. 20% of users were dissatisfied with software integration, citing challenges in setting up the interface with specific DAWs. Some users experienced difficulties in configuring settings to achieve optimal performance, which was frustrating and time-consuming. 80% innovation 78% of users appreciated the innovative features of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, particularly its USB-C connectivity and compact design. They felt that these features represented a forward-thinking approach to audio interface design, catering to modern user needs. 22% of users were dissatisfied with the innovation aspect, feeling that the interface lacked groundbreaking features or advanced functionalities that could set it apart from competitors. Some users expected more cutting-edge technology or additional inputs/outputs to enhance versatility. 78% input/output options 75% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the single XLR input sufficient for their basic recording needs and appreciated the simplicity of the interface's design. 25% of users were dissatisfied with the limited input/output options, expressing a desire for more flexibility, such as additional inputs or a MIDI connection. Users who required more complex setups felt restricted by the interface's minimal connectivity options. 75% aesthetic appeal 88% of users were satisfied with the aesthetic appeal of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its sleek and minimalist design, which complemented their existing audio gear and added a touch of sophistication to their setups. 12% of users were not impressed with the aesthetic appeal, describing it as too plain and lacking distinctive features. Some users felt that a more visually striking design could enhance the product's appeal and make it stand out in a crowded market. 88% versatility 77% of users were satisfied with the versatility of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, finding it adaptable to various recording environments and applications. They appreciated its ability to handle different audio tasks effectively, from podcasting to music production. 23% of users were dissatisfied with the versatility, noting that the interface was limited in terms of expandability and connectivity. Users seeking a more comprehensive solution for diverse audio needs felt that the interface's options were too constrained. 77% mic preamp quality 91% of users were satisfied with the mic preamp quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised the clarity and low noise performance, which enhanced the quality of their recordings and exceeded their expectations for an interface in this price range. 9% of users were dissatisfied with the mic preamp quality, reporting occasional noise and signal issues. Some felt that the preamp lacked the warmth and richness found in higher-end models, which affected the overall sound quality. 91% headphone output quality 89% of users were satisfied with the headphone output quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the output to be powerful and clear, allowing for accurate monitoring and mixing during recording sessions. 11% of users were dissatisfied with the headphone output quality, mentioning a lack of volume and clarity with certain headphones. Some users experienced distortion at higher volumes, which impacted their ability to monitor audio effectively. 89% USB-C connectivity 90% of users appreciated the USB-C connectivity of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, which provided fast data transfer and a stable connection. Users noted that it was a significant improvement over older USB standards, enhancing their overall experience. 10% of users were dissatisfied with the USB-C connectivity, mainly due to compatibility issues with older devices or the need for additional adapters. Some users found it inconvenient to upgrade their existing setups to accommodate the new standard. 90% build quality 93% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its sturdy construction and premium materials, which gave them confidence in the product's durability and long-term use. 7% of users expressed concerns about the build quality, reporting minor defects or inconsistencies in the finish. Some users experienced issues with the durability of certain components, such as the knobs and switches, which affected their overall satisfaction. 93% Show More

User Rating Based on Analysis of Reviews

Purchase Value

85% of users found the purchase value of the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface to be excellent. They praised its affordability compared to other interfaces offering similar quality and features. The combination of professional-grade sound and user-friendly interface made the EVO 4 a worthwhile investment for both beginners and experienced users.

15% of users felt dissatisfied, mainly due to expectations of more advanced features at a similar price point. Some users compared it to higher-tier audio interfaces and found the EVO 4 lacking in certain premium functionalities.

85%
Quality of Materials

80% of users appreciated the build quality of the Audient EVO 4, noting its sturdy construction and durability. The materials used in its design were considered robust, ensuring longevity and consistent performance over time.

20% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the materials, describing them as feeling somewhat 'plasticky' or less premium than expected. These users anticipated a more metallic finish and felt the interface could be more resistant to wear and tear.

80%
Ease of Use

90% of users lauded the EVO 4 for its ease of use, highlighting the intuitive layout and straightforward setup process. The Smartgain feature was particularly praised for simplifying the recording process, making it accessible even for those new to audio interfaces.

10% of users found the learning curve steeper than anticipated, especially when integrating the device with certain DAWs or when seeking to maximize its potential features. This minority felt that initial setup instructions could be more comprehensive.

90%
Sound Quality

92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality delivered by the Audient EVO 4. They noted the clarity and precision in audio capture, attributing these qualities to the high-quality preamps and converters. The interface was often compared favorably to more expensive models.

8% of users expressed dissatisfaction, pointing out occasional background noise or interference in specific recording environments. These users expected a completely noise-free experience and suggested that the noise floor could be improved.

92%
Portability

88% of users were pleased with the portability of the EVO 4, finding its compact design and lightweight nature perfect for mobile recording setups. This portability was a major plus for users who needed to work in various locations.

12% of users felt the interface could be even more compact for easier transport in smaller bags or cases. Additionally, some mentioned that while the device was portable, the accompanying cables could be more travel-friendly.

88%
Driver Stability

82% of users reported stable and reliable performance from the EVO 4's drivers, noting minimal dropouts or latency issues during recording sessions. The drivers were generally easy to install and provided consistent results across different systems.

18% of users encountered stability issues, such as occasional disconnections or compatibility problems with specific operating systems. These users suggested improvements in firmware updates to address these concerns.

82%
Customer Support

78% of users found the customer support for Audient products, including the EVO 4, to be responsive and helpful. Many appreciated the prompt responses and effective solutions provided by the support team.

22% of users were dissatisfied, citing slow response times and unresolved issues. Some users felt that the support team could be more knowledgeable about technical problems specific to the EVO 4.

78%
Design Aesthetics

86% of users appreciated the sleek and modern design of the EVO 4. The minimalist aesthetic and easy-to-read controls were particularly appealing, making the interface a visually attractive addition to any studio setup.

14% of users were less impressed with the design, finding it somewhat plain or lacking distinctive features that make it stand out. They suggested more customizable options or color variations to enhance its visual appeal.

86%
Feature Set

84% of users were satisfied with the feature set of the EVO 4, especially the innovative Smartgain function and loopback capabilities. These features were highly valued by podcasters and streamers for their convenience and functionality.

16% of users felt that the feature set could be expanded. Some expected additional inputs or outputs and more advanced routing options, which they believed would enhance the interface's versatility and appeal.

84%
Integration with DAWs

87% of users reported seamless integration of the EVO 4 with various DAWs, highlighting the ease of setting up and using the interface with popular software like Ableton Live and Logic Pro. The compatibility across multiple platforms was a significant benefit.

13% of users faced challenges with DAW integration, noting occasional issues with recognition or configuration settings. These users suggested that more detailed guidance or tutorials could assist in resolving such problems.

87%
Latency

89% of users were happy with the low latency performance of the EVO 4, praising its ability to deliver real-time monitoring without noticeable delay. This capability was crucial for live recording and streaming applications.

11% of users experienced latency issues, particularly when using older systems or during high-demand tasks. They recommended optimization options or settings adjustments to further reduce latency.

89%
Durability

81% of users felt confident in the durability of the EVO 4, mentioning the solid construction and resilience of the device under regular use. This durability was a key factor in their positive long-term experience.

19% of users questioned the device's longevity, citing concerns over the durability of knobs and connectors. They suggested improvements in the build quality of these components to enhance overall durability.

81%
Setup Process

88% of users found the setup process of the EVO 4 straightforward and quick, allowing them to start recording within minutes. The simplicity of connecting and configuring the device was a major convenience for users.

12% of users experienced difficulties during setup, often related to driver installation or configuration with their computer systems. They recommended clearer instructions or more detailed setup guides to assist new users.

88%
Headphone Output Quality

85% of users praised the quality of the headphone output, noting the clear and accurate sound reproduction. This aspect was particularly important for monitoring and mixing tasks.

15% of users felt the headphone output could be improved, mentioning issues like insufficient volume levels or slight distortion at higher volumes. They suggested enhancements to the amplifier quality for better performance.

85%
Microphone Preamp Quality

91% of users were impressed with the microphone preamp quality, which provided clean and transparent sound capture with minimal noise. This feature was highly valued by musicians and vocalists for its professional-level performance.

9% of users were less satisfied, citing specific instances of noise or interference in certain environments. They suggested that further refinement in preamp design could mitigate these issues.

91%
USB-C Connectivity

93% of users appreciated the USB-C connectivity, which ensured fast data transfer and reliable power delivery. This modern connection standard was a key advantage for users with newer devices.

7% of users encountered connectivity issues, often related to incompatible cables or ports. They recommended clearer compatibility information and potentially including a USB-C to USB-A adapter.

93%
Loopback Functionality

86% of users found the loopback functionality of the EVO 4 extremely useful, especially for podcasting and live streaming. This feature allowed for easy routing of audio from different sources, enhancing the flexibility of the interface.

14% of users struggled with configuring loopback settings, experiencing difficulties in achieving the desired audio routing. They suggested more detailed instructions or user support for this feature.

86%
Compatibility with Operating Systems

84% of users were satisfied with the operating system compatibility of the EVO 4, highlighting its smooth operation on both Windows and macOS platforms. The plug-and-play nature was a significant convenience for many users.

16% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with Linux systems or during updates to newer OS versions. They recommended expanding support and providing more frequent driver updates.

84%
Control Knob Functionality

82% of users valued the functionality of the control knob, which allowed for precise adjustments and easy navigation of settings. The tactile feel and responsiveness were often highlighted as positive aspects.

18% of users felt the control knob could be improved, noting occasional issues with responsiveness or durability. They suggested enhancements to the knob's design for a smoother user experience.

82%
Overall Satisfaction

88% of users expressed overall satisfaction with the Audient EVO 4, citing its combination of high-quality sound, user-friendly features, and reliable performance as key factors in their positive experience. The interface met or exceeded expectations for most users.

12% of users were less satisfied overall, often due to specific issues like driver stability or feature limitations that impacted their experience. They recommended addressing these concerns to improve the product's appeal.

88%

purchase value

85% of users were satisfied with the purchase value of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the combination of high-quality audio output and affordable pricing, making it accessible for both amateur and professional audio enthusiasts. Users felt that the interface offered excellent performance without breaking the bank, which was especially appealing to those who were budget-conscious.

15% of users expressed dissatisfaction with the purchase value, citing that similar products with more features were available at a comparable price. Some users felt that the interface lacked advanced options that could have justified the price point, leading them to believe they were not getting the best value for their money.

85%
quality of materials

90% of users were pleased with the quality of materials used in the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. Many commented on its robust build and high-quality components, which contributed to a perception of durability and reliability. Users appreciated the metal casing, which provided a sturdy feel and assured them of the product's longevity.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the quality of materials, mentioning that the unit felt heavier and bulkier than expected. A few users experienced issues with the knobs and buttons, reporting that they felt loose or less responsive over time, which detracted from the overall quality perception.

90%
ease of use

88% of users found the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface easy to use, highlighting its plug-and-play functionality and straightforward design. The interface was praised for its intuitive controls, which made it accessible to beginners and professionals alike, allowing users to focus more on their creative process rather than technical setup.

12% of users were not satisfied with the ease of use, mainly due to initial setup challenges. Some users encountered difficulties with driver installation and compatibility issues with certain operating systems, which required additional troubleshooting and technical knowledge.

88%
sound quality

92% of users were highly satisfied with the sound quality provided by the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its ability to deliver clear and crisp audio, which significantly enhanced their recording and playback experiences. Users noted that the preamps were quiet and offered a professional-grade sound that exceeded their expectations.

8% of users were disappointed with the sound quality, pointing out occasional noise interference and less than optimal performance when compared to higher-end models. A few users experienced problems with signal stability, which affected the overall audio output during critical recording sessions.

92%
compatibility

83% of users were satisfied with the compatibility of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface with various devices and operating systems. They appreciated that it worked seamlessly with most popular DAWs and platforms, allowing them to integrate it easily into their existing setups without significant adjustments.

17% of users faced compatibility issues, particularly with older operating systems and less common DAWs. Some users reported that the interface required specific drivers that were not readily available or resulted in latency problems, which hampered their recording sessions.

83%
design

87% of users were satisfied with the design of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated its sleek and modern appearance, as well as the compact size which made it portable and easy to incorporate into any workspace. The minimalist design was also noted as a positive aspect, providing an aesthetically pleasing addition to their audio gear.

13% of users were dissatisfied with the design, noting that the interface's compactness sometimes made it feel cramped, especially when connecting multiple devices. A few users expressed a preference for more visible labeling on the controls and connections, which could have improved usability in low-light environments.

87%
durability

89% of users expressed satisfaction with the durability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They were impressed by its robust construction, which they felt could withstand regular use and transport without easily succumbing to wear and tear. The metal casing was specifically mentioned as a factor that contributed to its perceived durability.

11% of users were not satisfied with the durability, reporting issues like premature wear on the knobs and switches. Some users experienced loose connections after extended use, which undermined their confidence in the product's long-term reliability.

89%
portability

86% of users were satisfied with the portability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated its lightweight design and compact form factor, which made it easy to transport and ideal for on-the-go recording sessions. The interface was often praised for fitting comfortably into backpacks and small carry cases.

14% of users were dissatisfied with the portability, citing that the interface, while compact, required additional cables and adapters for certain setups, which added to the bulk. Some users found it inconvenient to constantly disconnect and reconnect the device when moving between locations.

86%
latency

84% of users were satisfied with the low latency performance of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found that it provided smooth and responsive audio processing, which was crucial for live monitoring and recording applications. Many users highlighted its real-time performance as a key benefit.

16% of users experienced dissatisfaction with latency issues, particularly when using the interface with certain DAWs or plugins. Some users noted occasional delays that affected the synchronization of audio tracks, which was problematic for time-sensitive recordings.

84%
driver stability

82% of users were satisfied with the driver stability of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They reported a reliable connection and consistent performance across various sessions, which minimized interruptions and technical difficulties during critical tasks.

18% of users were dissatisfied with driver stability, encountering frequent disconnections and crashes. Some users struggled with maintaining a stable connection, especially during extended recording sessions, which affected their workflow and productivity.

82%
customer support

81% of users were satisfied with the customer support provided by RODE for the AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They appreciated the prompt and helpful responses from support staff, which resolved their queries effectively and enhanced their overall experience with the product.

19% of users were dissatisfied with customer support, reporting delays in response times and a lack of comprehensive solutions to their problems. Some users felt that the support team lacked technical knowledge, which left their issues unresolved.

81%
software integration

80% of users were satisfied with the software integration capabilities of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found it compatible with a wide range of DAWs and appreciated the seamless integration with most audio editing software, which facilitated a smooth workflow.

20% of users were dissatisfied with software integration, citing challenges in setting up the interface with specific DAWs. Some users experienced difficulties in configuring settings to achieve optimal performance, which was frustrating and time-consuming.

80%
innovation

78% of users appreciated the innovative features of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, particularly its USB-C connectivity and compact design. They felt that these features represented a forward-thinking approach to audio interface design, catering to modern user needs.

22% of users were dissatisfied with the innovation aspect, feeling that the interface lacked groundbreaking features or advanced functionalities that could set it apart from competitors. Some users expected more cutting-edge technology or additional inputs/outputs to enhance versatility.

78%
input/output options

75% of users were satisfied with the input/output options available on the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the single XLR input sufficient for their basic recording needs and appreciated the simplicity of the interface's design.

25% of users were dissatisfied with the limited input/output options, expressing a desire for more flexibility, such as additional inputs or a MIDI connection. Users who required more complex setups felt restricted by the interface's minimal connectivity options.

75%
aesthetic appeal

88% of users were satisfied with the aesthetic appeal of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its sleek and minimalist design, which complemented their existing audio gear and added a touch of sophistication to their setups.

12% of users were not impressed with the aesthetic appeal, describing it as too plain and lacking distinctive features. Some users felt that a more visually striking design could enhance the product's appeal and make it stand out in a crowded market.

88%
versatility

77% of users were satisfied with the versatility of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, finding it adaptable to various recording environments and applications. They appreciated its ability to handle different audio tasks effectively, from podcasting to music production.

23% of users were dissatisfied with the versatility, noting that the interface was limited in terms of expandability and connectivity. Users seeking a more comprehensive solution for diverse audio needs felt that the interface's options were too constrained.

77%
mic preamp quality

91% of users were satisfied with the mic preamp quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised the clarity and low noise performance, which enhanced the quality of their recordings and exceeded their expectations for an interface in this price range.

9% of users were dissatisfied with the mic preamp quality, reporting occasional noise and signal issues. Some felt that the preamp lacked the warmth and richness found in higher-end models, which affected the overall sound quality.

91%
headphone output quality

89% of users were satisfied with the headphone output quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They found the output to be powerful and clear, allowing for accurate monitoring and mixing during recording sessions.

11% of users were dissatisfied with the headphone output quality, mentioning a lack of volume and clarity with certain headphones. Some users experienced distortion at higher volumes, which impacted their ability to monitor audio effectively.

89%
USB-C connectivity

90% of users appreciated the USB-C connectivity of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface, which provided fast data transfer and a stable connection. Users noted that it was a significant improvement over older USB standards, enhancing their overall experience.

10% of users were dissatisfied with the USB-C connectivity, mainly due to compatibility issues with older devices or the need for additional adapters. Some users found it inconvenient to upgrade their existing setups to accommodate the new standard.

90%
build quality

93% of users were satisfied with the build quality of the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface. They praised its sturdy construction and premium materials, which gave them confidence in the product's durability and long-term use.

7% of users expressed concerns about the build quality, reporting minor defects or inconsistencies in the finish. Some users experienced issues with the durability of certain components, such as the knobs and switches, which affected their overall satisfaction.

93%

Pros:
High-quality preamps with 58dB gain range. Smartgain feature for automatic level adjustment. Compact and portable design. USB-C connectivity for fast data transfer. Low latency performance. User-friendly interface with LED metering.	High-quality preamps and audio conversion. Rugged and compact design. Easy setup and operation with plug-and-play functionality. Compatible with both Mac and Windows. Includes balanced outputs for studio monitors.

Cons:
Limited to two input channels. Plastic construction may feel less durable. No MIDI input/output. Requires USB-C compatible devices for optimal performance.	Limited to a single input channel, which may not be suitable for multi-input recording needs. No midi input/output. Pricier compared to some other single-input interfaces. Lacks onboard controls for gain and monitoring.

Key Specs
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 96 kHz	1 Input / 2 Output
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	96 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	1
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Mic/Line Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output
Host Connection
1x USB-C	USB-C
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.7.5 or Later Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit) 6 or Later	macOS 10.10 or Later Windows 7 or Later
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface each offer distinct features tailored for differing user needs, particularly in terms of channels of input/output, microphone inputs, analog audio I/O, and other technical specifications.
The RODE AI-1 supports 1 input and 2 outputs, with a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz at 24-bit resolution. It features one microphone input, facilitating straightforward recording setups for solo artists or podcasters. The analog audio I/O on the AI-1 includes a single combo XLR-1/4" TRS mic/line input, two 1/4" TRS balanced line outputs, and one 1/4" TRS headphone output. This interface connects via USB-C and is compatible with macOS 10.10 or later and Windows 7 or later. It is powered through USB bus power, making it a portable and convenient option for those who need a simple and effective recording solution.
In contrast, the Audient EVO 4 is more versatile, offering 2 analog inputs and 2 outputs, also supporting a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz at 24-bit resolution. It features two microphone preamps, which makes it suitable for recording multiple sources simultaneously, such as vocals and instruments. The EVO 4 includes two combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line inputs, one 1/4" TS unbalanced Hi-Z input for direct instrument recording, two 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs, and one 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output. Similar to the AI-1, it uses a USB-C connection and is compatible with macOS 10.7.5 or later and Windows 7 or later (both 32- and 64-bit). The EVO 4 is also powered via USB bus power, ensuring easy setup and mobility.
While both interfaces connect via USB-C and share similar sampling rates and bit depth, the Audient EVO 4 stands out with additional input options and dual microphone preamps, catering to more complex recording needs. The RODE AI-1, with its simpler setup, is ideal for single-user applications or those who prefer a straightforward recording interface.

General
Channels of I/O
Analog: 2 Inputs / 2 Outputs at 96 kHz	1 Input / 2 Output
Maximum Sampling Rate
96 kHz / 24-Bit	96 kHz / 24-Bit
Number of Microphone Inputs
2 Preamps	1
Input Level Adjustment
2x Automatic 1x Knob	2x Knob
Expansion Slots

The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface features 1 input and 2 output channels, catering to basic recording needs with its singular microphone input. It does not include built-in DSP, which means it lacks onboard effects and processing capabilities. The maximum sampling rate is 96 kHz at 24-bit, ensuring high-resolution audio capture. Input level adjustments are facilitated by two knobs, offering manual control over the input levels. The AI-1 does not possess built-in microphones or expansion slots.
On the other hand, the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface offers a bit more versatility with 2 analog inputs and 2 outputs at the same maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz at 24-bit. It features two microphone preamps, allowing for dual mic inputs, which is advantageous for more complex recording setups. The EVO 4 also includes automatic input level adjustment in addition to a single knob for manual control, providing greater ease of use, especially for beginners. Like the RODE AI-1, it does not have built-in microphones or expansion slots.
In summary, the RODE AI-1 is ideal for simpler, single-microphone setups with manual level control, while the Audient EVO 4 offers more flexibility with dual mic inputs, automatic level adjustment, and a slightly more user-friendly interface for those needing to handle multiple inputs.

Signal Processing
Gain/Trim Range
Mic/Line/Hi-Z Inputs: 58 dB	Inputs: 0 to 45 dB
High-Pass Filter

Solo/Mute
Mute per Input Channel, Master

The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface each offer unique features tailored to different user needs. When considering the gain/trim range, the RODE AI-1 provides a range of 0 to 45 dB for its inputs, while the Audient EVO 4 offers a more extensive gain/trim range of 58 dB for its Mic/Line/Hi-Z inputs. This wider range on the EVO 4 may appeal to users who require more gain flexibility and headroom for various recording scenarios.
Both interfaces lack a high-pass filter, which means users will need to manage low-frequency noise and rumble through other means, such as post-processing or using external hardware.
In terms of solo and mute functionalities, the RODE AI-1 does not offer these features. On the other hand, the Audient EVO 4 includes the ability to mute per input channel and also provides a master mute function. This added flexibility can be particularly useful in more complex recording and monitoring setups, allowing for greater control over individual input channels and the overall output.
Overall, the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface offers a more versatile gain/trim range and additional muting options compared to the RODE AI-1, making it potentially more suitable for users looking for enhanced control over their recording environment.

Connectivity
Analog Audio I/O
2x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Balanced Mic/Line Input 1x 1/4" TS Unbalanced Hi-Z Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Monitor Output 1x 1/4" TRS Unbalanced Headphone Output	1x Combo XLR-1/4" TRS Mic/Line Input 2x 1/4" TRS Balanced Line Output 1x 1/4" TRS Headphone Output
Phantom Power
48 V ± 4 V, Selectable On/Off (Selectable on Individual Inputs)	48 V
Digital Audio I/O

Host Connection
1x USB-C	USB-C
Host Connection Protocol
USB 2.0	Not Specified by Manufacturer
USB (Non-Host)

Sync I/O

Network I/O

MIDI I/O

The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface features a single combo XLR-1/4" TRS mic/line input, making it suitable for simple recording setups requiring one microphone or line input. It includes two 1/4" TRS balanced line outputs for connecting to monitors and one 1/4" TRS headphone output. The RODE AI-1 provides 48V phantom power for condenser microphones. It connects to the host through a USB-C port, though the specific USB protocol is not detailed. There are no additional digital audio I/O, sync, network, or MIDI connections, making it a streamlined and straightforward interface designed for basic recording needs.
In comparison, the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface offers more versatility with its two combo XLR-1/4" TRS balanced mic/line inputs, which allow for more complex recording setups involving multiple microphones or line inputs. Additionally, it includes a 1/4" TS unbalanced Hi-Z input, which is ideal for connecting instruments like electric guitars directly. The EVO 4 also features two 1/4" TRS balanced monitor outputs and one 1/4" TRS unbalanced headphone output. Phantom power is available at 48V ±4V and can be individually selected for each input, with a current of 10 mA per channel. It connects to the host via USB-C with USB 2.0 protocol. Similar to the RODE AI-1, the EVO 4 lacks additional digital audio I/O, sync, network, and MIDI connections.
Overall, the Audient EVO 4 provides greater input flexibility and additional features such as individual phantom power control and Hi-Z input, making it a more versatile choice for users with more complex recording needs. The RODE AI-1, on the other hand, offers a simpler and more straightforward setup, suitable for users who require basic functionality without the need for additional inputs or controls.

Performance
Frequency Response
Mic Inputs: 10 Hz to 40 kHz ±0.5 dB Line, Hi-Z Inputs: 10 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.5 dB A/D Converters: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB D/A Converters: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB Headphone Outputs: 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB	20 Hz to 20 kHz ±1 dB
Maximum Output Level
D/A Converters: +11 dBu	Monitor Outputs: -6 dBu
Headphone Output Power
45 mW into 30 Ohms (Max) 52 mW into 60 Ohms (Max) 20 mW into 600 Ohms (Max)	24 mW into 32 Ohms 245 mW into 300 Ohms
Impedance
Mic Inputs: > 3 Kilohms (Balanced) Line Inputs: > 10 Kilohms (Balanced) Hi-Z Inputs: 1 Megohm (Unbalanced)	Hi-Z Inputs: 0.9 Megohm Mic Inputs: 1.3 Kilohms
Dynamic Range
AD/DA Converters: 113 dBA	104 dBu
EIN
Mic/Line Inputs: < -128 dB	-128 dBA

When comparing the RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface, key differences emerge regarding their specifications and performance in various aspects.
Frequency Response: - RODE AI-1: Offers a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz with a deviation of ±1 dB. - Audient EVO 4: Provides a broader frequency response, with mic inputs covering 10 Hz to 40 kHz ±0.5 dB, line and Hi-Z inputs at 10 Hz to 20 kHz ±0.5 dB, and both A/D and D/A converters and headphone outputs extending from 10 Hz to fs/2 ±0.5 dB.
Maximum Output Level: - RODE AI-1: The monitor outputs deliver a maximum output level of -6 dBu. - Audient EVO 4: D/A converters provide a higher maximum output level of +11 dBu.
Headphone Output Power: - RODE AI-1: Delivers 24 mW into 32 Ohms and 245 mW into 300 Ohms. - Audient EVO 4: Offers 45 mW into 30 Ohms (max), 52 mW into 60 Ohms (max), and 20 mW into 600 Ohms (max).
Impedance: - RODE AI-1: Hi-Z inputs have an impedance of 0.9 Megohm, while mic inputs have an impedance of 1.3 Kilohms. - Audient EVO 4: Mic inputs have an impedance greater than 3 Kilohms (balanced), line inputs greater than 10 Kilohms (balanced), and Hi-Z inputs at 1 Megohm (unbalanced).
Dynamic Range: - RODE AI-1: Features a dynamic range of 104 dBu. - Audient EVO 4: Boasts a higher dynamic range with AD/DA converters at 113 dBA.
EIN (Equivalent Input Noise): - RODE AI-1: Records an EIN of -128 dBA. - Audient EVO 4: Provides an EIN of less than -128 dB for mic/line inputs.
Additional specifications for the Audient EVO 4 include: - SNR (Signal-to-Noise Ratio): 100 dB for mic/line/Hi-Z inputs. - THD+N (Total Harmonic Distortion plus Noise): Less than 0.001% for A/D converters, less than 0.0015% for D/A converters and headphone outputs, less than 0.3% for Hi-Z inputs, and less than 0.0015% for mic/line inputs. - CMRR (Common-Mode Rejection Ratio): Greater than 85 dB for mic/line inputs.
In conclusion, while both interfaces have their strengths, the Audient EVO 4 generally offers superior specifications in terms of frequency response, maximum output level, dynamic range, and additional features like SNR and THD+N, making it a more robust choice for professionals seeking high-quality audio performance.

Digital Audio
Sample Rates
Up to 96 kHz	44.1 / 48 / 88.2 / 96 kHz
Sample Rate Conversion

Bit Depths
Up to 24-Bit	24-Bit
Latency
5 ms at 44.1 kHz (Dependent on Buffer Size, Input to Output) 4.1 ms at 96 kHz (Dependent on Buffer Size, Input to Output)	Zero-Latency Direct Monitoring

The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface both cater to the needs of audio recording enthusiasts and professionals, but they have distinct differences in their specifications and capabilities.
The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface supports sample rates of 44.1, 48, 88.2, and 96 kHz, and offers a bit depth of 24-bit. It features zero-latency direct monitoring, which is advantageous for real-time audio tracking without delay. The AI-1 relies on an internal clock for its timing functions, ensuring stable and accurate audio recording within its supported sample rates. However, it does not support sample rate conversion, which means the user must manually select the appropriate sample rate for their project.
On the other hand, the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface offers a broader range in terms of dBFS reference levels, with inputs at +8 dBu equating to 0 dBFS and outputs at +11 dBu equating to 0 dBFS. This enhances its flexibility when dealing with various input and output levels. The EVO 4 supports sample rates up to 96 kHz and bit depths up to 24-bit, similar to the RODE AI-1. The latency for the EVO 4 varies, with 5 ms at 44.1 kHz and 4.1 ms at 96 kHz, depending on the buffer size, which is quite low and suitable for professional use. Like the RODE AI-1, it also uses an internal sync source for clocking.
In summary, while both interfaces provide high-quality audio recording capabilities with up to 96 kHz sample rates and 24-bit depth, the RODE AI-1 emphasizes zero-latency direct monitoring and simplicity. In contrast, the Audient EVO 4 offers more detailed control over input and output levels and slightly lower latency times, making it potentially more suitable for users who need precise control over their audio levels and lower latency performance.

Compatibility
OS Compatibility
macOS 10.7.5 or Later Windows 7 or Later (32-/64-Bit) 6 or Later	macOS 10.10 or Later Windows 7 or Later

The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface are both designed to cater to the needs of musicians, podcasters, and content creators, but they do have some differences in terms of OS compatibility and hardware requirements.
The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface is compatible with macOS 10.10 or later and Windows 7 or later. It does not specify any particular processor or RAM requirements, nor does it explicitly mention the need for an internet connection for registration or software download. This makes it relatively straightforward and easy to set up, especially for users who already have compatible operating systems.
On the other hand, the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface offers a slightly broader range of OS compatibility, supporting macOS 10.7.5 or later and Windows 7 or later (both 32-/64-bit). The EVO 4 also provides specific hardware requirements: for Mac, it requires an Intel processor, and for PC, a 1.6 GHz Intel Core 2 or AMD processor. Additionally, it necessitates at least 1 GB of RAM and an available USB 2.0 port. The EVO 4 also requires an internet connection for registration and software/driver downloads, which could be an important consideration for users without consistent internet access.
Overall, both interfaces are compatible with modern operating systems, but the Audient EVO 4 offers broader compatibility with older macOS versions and provides more detailed hardware requirements. This detailed specification might be beneficial for users who need to ensure their system meets the necessary criteria for optimal performance.

Power
Power Requirements
USB Bus Power	USB Bus Power

The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface both share the convenience of USB bus power requirements, which means they draw power directly from the connected device via the USB-C port. This feature eliminates the need for an external power supply, making both interfaces highly portable and easy to set up for on-the-go recording sessions.
The RODE AI-1 is designed to be a straightforward and user-friendly audio interface, featuring a single combo jack for XLR and 1/4" inputs, a high-quality preamp, and a studio-quality headphone output. Its minimalistic design and build quality are geared towards users who need a reliable and simple solution for recording vocals and instruments.
On the other hand, the Audient EVO 4 takes a more feature-rich approach while still maintaining the simplicity of USB bus power. It includes two combo inputs, Smartgain mode for automatic gain adjustment, and a loopback function for capturing audio from your computer. The EVO 4 also offers a unique feature set aimed at podcasters, streamers, and musicians who require more versatility and control over their recordings.
In summary, while both the RODE AI-1 and Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interfaces are powered via USB bus power, they cater to slightly different user needs. The RODE AI-1 focuses on simplicity and high-quality preamps, making it ideal for straightforward recording tasks. In contrast, the Audient EVO 4 offers additional features such as Smartgain and loopback, providing more flexibility and functionality for users who need a more versatile recording solution.

Physical
Dimensions
5.51 x 2.64 x 2.64" / 14 x 6.71 x 6.71 cm	4.9 x 3.9 x 1.5" / 124 x 100 x 38 mm
Weight
12.7 oz / 360.0 g	19.8 oz / 561.3 g

The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface are both compact and portable solutions for audio recording, but they differ in terms of dimensions and weight.
The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface measures 4.9 x 3.9 x 1.5 inches (124 x 100 x 38 mm) and weighs 19.8 ounces (561.3 grams). It is relatively compact but heavier compared to the Audient EVO 4, which could be a consideration for users who prioritize portability alongside robust build quality.
On the other hand, the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface has dimensions of 5.51 x 2.64 x 2.64 inches (14 x 6.71 x 6.71 cm) and weighs 12.7 ounces (360.0 grams). Its design is slightly longer and narrower than the RODE AI-1, but it is significantly lighter, which may appeal to users who need a more portable and lightweight interface for on-the-go recording.
In summary, the RODE AI-1 is slightly more compact in terms of overall volume but heavier, while the Audient EVO 4 offers a lighter weight and a slightly more elongated form factor. Users should consider these physical characteristics based on their specific needs for portability and ease of use.

Packaging Info
Package Weight
1.29 lb	1.155 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
6.8 x 3.85 x 3.55"	7 x 5.1 x 2.55"

The RODE AI-1 USB-C Audio Interface and the Audient EVO 4 USB-C Audio Interface are two compact and functional devices designed for high-quality audio recording and playback. In terms of package weight, the RODE AI-1 comes in slightly lighter at 1.155 lb, whereas the Audient EVO 4 is marginally heavier at 1.29 lb. This slight difference in weight is unlikely to significantly affect portability for most users.
Regarding the physical dimensions of the packaging, the RODE AI-1's box measures 7 x 5.1 x 2.55 inches. In comparison, the Audient EVO 4 has a box dimension of 6.8 x 3.85 x 3.55 inches. The RODE AI-1's packaging is wider and flatter, while the Audient EVO 4's box is more compact and taller. This suggests that the RODE AI-1 might take up more surface area in storage, but the Audient EVO 4's packaging might be easier to fit into tighter spaces due to its smaller width and height.
Both interfaces offer USB-C connectivity, ensuring fast data transfer and low latency, which is crucial for professional audio recording. However, the slight differences in weight and dimensions might appeal to users with specific portability and storage needs.